Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-11-14 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
THIS has to be one of the bugs we address ASAP.
Thanks Curry for doing the leg work on this one.
I hope the team is paying attention to this one.
This is one of the things that a new user has no hope of being aware of.

Thanks,

Tom
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-11-12 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
I was having problems with SE on Windows randomly causing crashes just by
clicking in the text are of SE.

When I switched off all the bling, I never had another crash like that. I
plan to slowly re-introduce the bling to see if I can identify which part
causes the crashes.

Regards, Bernard
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-11-10 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode



Resurrecting this thread from September because ...
now I've had a chance to go through my old bug reports,
and found the one for this Script Editor slowdown!
(It said "Pending Followup" so I just followed up on it.)

For the people here that still see bad IDE/SE performance
(and there were several: Lagi, Bob, Bernard, Andre, etc)
you can benefit from adding your CC to this bug report
and post your symptoms/setup there to help LC fix this.

Plus, I posted 7 steps that worked for myself and others;
many people have resolved this for their own computers!

BTW, I have NOT had this problem myself for 1 or 2 years;
so those steps are tried and true. (They work in MOST cases.)

Here's the bug report:

https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21604

No slowdowns on my end anymore; Windows "just works." :)
I could have simply closed the bug, but I followed up
and posted those 7 steps to help the rest of you.

Most importantly, it's NOT just a Windows issue.
(We have to avoid myths, or we can't solve problems.)
I've seen it twice on Mac myself, and others have too.
But it is MUCH more common on Windows. Rare on Mac.
Mostly due to antivirus trends, but other factors.

For the LC team, I'm not sure whether they ever
reproduced this bug or not, so I posted some tips
on maxing out disk and memory to help notice problems.

(That doesn't mean people with the IDE problems
are running a bunch of videos and downloads;
just getting closer to real-life use conditions
versus a more pristine test environment.)

Hopefully someone still having the issues
will follow up there to help get it fixed.

I don't anymore, so I'm moving on to other bugs!

One thing I forgot to mention is that LC Setup
is badly behaved on all platforms, and I've seen
literally a dozen copies of it in Task Manager;
that can also bog things down too!

I have a zero-tolerance policy for .Setup;
it is not allowed to run on my computer
except during the initial installation.

And like I say, no IDE slowdowns for 1-2 years.

(Not to be confused with IDE crashes
and bugs that completely "hang" the engine!
I'm still a combatant on those bugs.) :)

Original thread:



Best wishes,

Curry Kenworthy

Custom Software Development
"Better Methods, Better Results"
Christian LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-10-04 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I could have sired a child who was just now graduating high school! :-) 

Bob S


> On Oct 3, 2021, at 09:16 , Mark Wieder via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> On 9/30/21 7:02 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
> 
>>  - a "require" or "include" mechanism for dependencies in libraries
> 
> LOL. That request is now some 17 years old.
> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark Wieder
> ahsoftw...@gmail.com
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-10-03 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode

On 9/30/21 7:02 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:


  - a "require" or "include" mechanism for dependencies in libraries


LOL. That request is now some 17 years old.
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712


--
 Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
They're only used for uploading or editing stacks that you want to 
share. (Oh, now that I think about it, maybe also to rate a stack from 
someone else).


I thought about just removing those buttons from the plugin (IMHO, the 
upload/edit functions are fine as they are), but then I thought someone 
might spend time trying to find how to do those actions; better, I 
think, to have an obvious button which immediately tells you that the 
plugin doesn't support it.


The main reason for not including that functionality was that I felt it 
was just a bit "off" to have a plugin ask for your username/password; I 
was glad to find that there doesn't seem to much need to do that part.


Alex.

On 30/09/2021 18:50, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:

This is really nice and fast, Alex. Thanks again for doing this as I’ve always felt that LC’s 
Sample Stacks is a great and often overlooked resource save for it’s interface. I note that 
"Log In" and "Sign Up" do not work. Is there any value in those items?

Roger


On Sep 30, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
 wrote:

Hmmm ... not sure why.

Easy way : https://www.tweedly.org/Downloads/samplestacks.livecode

Or: start the IDE, and  in the toolbar (4th or so from the right) is "Sample 
Stacks".

Then

  - select "View as: List"

  - select "All" on left hand side

  - select "Sort by: Date"

  - then reverse order the sort - and it's the most recent one !!


Or - select "Plugin" in the tags column (5th one down), then type "sample" in the search 
box and hit "Go"

Alex.


On 30/09/2021 16:17, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:

This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you described.

Roger


On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
 wrote:


On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:

On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:


Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in 
there but it has the issues you list.

So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. There's an old joke about 
a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, and ask for directions from an old farmer at the 
side of the road. "Well", says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from 
here."

I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how to 
solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom line is 
that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login / register / 
upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the searching / 
browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either (very) poor 
performance or unclear UI.

In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I wrote 
a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / downloading parts, 
and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.

It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called "Sample 
Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in the usual way.

UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.

  - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the "Go" 
button was removed

- everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.

  - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
understand)

  -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized

  - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
scrolled

There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling using mousepad 
doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems to be enough to 
"revive" it.

Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.

Thanks

Alex.




(*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
This is really nice and fast, Alex. Thanks again for doing this as I’ve always 
felt that LC’s Sample Stacks is a great and often overlooked resource save for 
it’s interface. I note that "Log In" and "Sign Up" do not work. Is there any 
value in those items?

Roger

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hmmm ... not sure why.
> 
> Easy way : https://www.tweedly.org/Downloads/samplestacks.livecode
> 
> Or: start the IDE, and  in the toolbar (4th or so from the right) is "Sample 
> Stacks".
> 
> Then
> 
>  - select "View as: List"
> 
>  - select "All" on left hand side
> 
>  - select "Sort by: Date"
> 
>  - then reverse order the sort - and it's the most recent one !!
> 
> 
> Or - select "Plugin" in the tags column (5th one down), then type "sample" in 
> the search box and hit "Go"
> 
> Alex.
> 
> 
> On 30/09/2021 16:17, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:
>> This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you 
>> described.
>> 
>> Roger
>> 
>>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
 On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:
 
> Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content 
> in there but it has the issues you list.
>>> So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. 
>>> There's an old joke about a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, 
>>> and ask for directions from an old farmer at the side of the road. "Well", 
>>> says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from here."
>>> 
>>> I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how 
>>> to solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom 
>>> line is that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login 
>>> / register / upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the 
>>> searching / browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either 
>>> (very) poor performance or unclear UI.
>>> 
>>> In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I 
>>> wrote a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / 
>>> downloading parts, and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.
>>> 
>>> It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called 
>>> "Sample Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in 
>>> the usual way.
>>> 
>>> UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.
>>> 
>>>  - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the 
>>> "Go" button was removed
>>> 
>>> - everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.
>>> 
>>>  - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
>>> understand)
>>> 
>>>  -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized
>>> 
>>>  - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
>>> scrolled
>>> 
>>> There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling 
>>> using mousepad doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems 
>>> to be enough to "revive" it.
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Alex.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
>>> being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
Ah, it worked this time. I thought one might need your plugin to find your 
plugin….

Thanks,

Roger

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hmmm ... not sure why.
> 
> Easy way : https://www.tweedly.org/Downloads/samplestacks.livecode
> 
> Or: start the IDE, and  in the toolbar (4th or so from the right) is "Sample 
> Stacks".
> 
> Then
> 
>  - select "View as: List"
> 
>  - select "All" on left hand side
> 
>  - select "Sort by: Date"
> 
>  - then reverse order the sort - and it's the most recent one !!
> 
> 
> Or - select "Plugin" in the tags column (5th one down), then type "sample" in 
> the search box and hit "Go"
> 
> Alex.
> 
> 
> On 30/09/2021 16:17, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:
>> This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you 
>> described.
>> 
>> Roger
>> 
>>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
 On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:
 
> Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content 
> in there but it has the issues you list.
>>> So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. 
>>> There's an old joke about a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, 
>>> and ask for directions from an old farmer at the side of the road. "Well", 
>>> says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from here."
>>> 
>>> I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how 
>>> to solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom 
>>> line is that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login 
>>> / register / upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the 
>>> searching / browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either 
>>> (very) poor performance or unclear UI.
>>> 
>>> In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I 
>>> wrote a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / 
>>> downloading parts, and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.
>>> 
>>> It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called 
>>> "Sample Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in 
>>> the usual way.
>>> 
>>> UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.
>>> 
>>>  - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the 
>>> "Go" button was removed
>>> 
>>> - everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.
>>> 
>>>  - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
>>> understand)
>>> 
>>>  -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized
>>> 
>>>  - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
>>> scrolled
>>> 
>>> There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling 
>>> using mousepad doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems 
>>> to be enough to "revive" it.
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Alex.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
>>> being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode

Hmmm ... not sure why.

Easy way : https://www.tweedly.org/Downloads/samplestacks.livecode

Or: start the IDE, and  in the toolbar (4th or so from the right) is 
"Sample Stacks".


Then

 - select "View as: List"

 - select "All" on left hand side

 - select "Sort by: Date"

 - then reverse order the sort - and it's the most recent one !!


Or - select "Plugin" in the tags column (5th one down), then type 
"sample" in the search box and hit "Go"


Alex.


On 30/09/2021 16:17, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:

This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you described.

Roger


On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
 wrote:


On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:

On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:


Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in 
there but it has the issues you list.

So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. There's an old joke about 
a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, and ask for directions from an old farmer at the 
side of the road. "Well", says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from 
here."

I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how to 
solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom line is 
that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login / register / 
upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the searching / 
browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either (very) poor 
performance or unclear UI.

In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I wrote 
a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / downloading parts, 
and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.

It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called "Sample 
Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in the usual way.

UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.

  - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the "Go" 
button was removed

- everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.

  - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
understand)

  -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized

  - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
scrolled

There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling using mousepad 
doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems to be enough to 
"revive" it.

Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.

Thanks

Alex.




(*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
There’s an old joke about a tourist in Maine asking a local for directions and 
an old farmer says “You can’t get theya from hereya”.

Roger

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 8:17 AM, Roger Guay via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you 
> described. 
> 
> Roger
> 
>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:
>>> 
 Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content 
 in there but it has the issues you list.
>> 
>> So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. 
>> There's an old joke about a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, 
>> and ask for directions from an old farmer at the side of the road. "Well", 
>> says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from here."
>> 
>> I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how 
>> to solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom 
>> line is that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login / 
>> register / upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the 
>> searching / browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either (very) 
>> poor performance or unclear UI.
>> 
>> In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I 
>> wrote a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / 
>> downloading parts, and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.
>> 
>> It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called 
>> "Sample Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in the 
>> usual way.
>> 
>> UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.
>> 
>> - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the 
>> "Go" button was removed
>> 
>> - everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.
>> 
>> - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
>> understand)
>> 
>> -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized
>> 
>> - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
>> scrolled
>> 
>> There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling 
>> using mousepad doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems to 
>> be enough to "revive" it.
>> 
>> Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Alex.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> (*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
>> being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
This sounds absolutely wonderful, Alex, except I can’t find it as you 
described. 

Roger

> On Sep 30, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
>> On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:
>> 
>>> Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in 
>>> there but it has the issues you list.
> 
> So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. 
> There's an old joke about a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is lost, 
> and ask for directions from an old farmer at the side of the road. "Well", 
> says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from here."
> 
> I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see how 
> to solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the bottom 
> line is that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. The login / 
> register / upload features all work just fine - the problems are with the 
> searching / browsing / filtering, and are generally related to either (very) 
> poor performance or unclear UI.
> 
> In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead I 
> wrote a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / 
> downloading parts, and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.
> 
> It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's called 
> "Sample Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a plugin in the 
> usual way.
> 
> UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.
> 
>  - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so the 
> "Go" button was removed
> 
> - everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.
> 
>  - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to use or 
> understand)
> 
>  -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized
> 
>  - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged and 
> scrolled
> 
> There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling using 
> mousepad doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar seems to be 
> enough to "revive" it.
> 
> Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Alex.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted to 
> being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode


On 30/09/2021 15:02, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:

On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:

Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of 
content in there but it has the issues you list.


So I had a look at what could be done just within the IDE for revonline. 
There's an old joke about a tourist in Ireland who realizes she(*) is 
lost, and ask for directions from an old farmer at the side of the road. 
"Well", says he, "if I wanted to go there, I wouldn't start from here."


I found the revonline scripts rather complex, and I couldn't easily see 
how to solve the issues mentioned previously, in that context. And the 
bottom line is that it's not a complex problem that needs to be solved. 
The login / register / upload features all work just fine - the problems 
are with the searching / browsing / filtering, and are generally related 
to either (very) poor performance or unclear UI.


In the end, I just couldn't produce worthwhile improvements, so instead 
I wrote a plugin that handles the searching / filtering / browsing / 
downloading parts, and which omits the login/upload parts entirely.


It can be downloaded from "Sample Stacks" in the IDE toolbar (it's 
called "Sample Stacks" and is tagged as IDE and Plugin). Install as a 
plugin in the usual way.


UI is very similar to the existing IDE version - simplified a bit.

 - search box automatically (and immediately) updates as you type, so 
the "Go" button was removed


- everything happens in < 1 second, so the progress bar was removed.

 - the grid/list choice was removed (the old 'list' stye was hard to 
use or understand)


 -  tags in the left-hand box are alphabetized

 - the grid is a single long scrolling group, rather than being paged 
and scrolled


There is one issue I haven;t tracked down yet - sometimes the scrolling 
using mousepad doesn't work initially; scrolling with the scrollbar 
seems to be enough to "revive" it.


Let me know if you try it and have any problems or suggestions.

Thanks

Alex.




(*) "she" is not sexist - had it been a man he would never have admitted 
to being lost and so would never have asked the question :-)




___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-30 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode

On 06/09/2021 15:14, Kevin Miller via use-livecode wrote:


Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in 
there but it has the issues you list.

Kind regards,

Kevin


Some of these issues can easily be tackled as a community effort / 
project - but it's not clear to me how the more serious ones could be 
done without project leadership (or at least strong involvement) from LC 
Ltd. The ability to store things other than traditional stacks (e.g. 
widgets, script-only stacks, documentation pages, e-books, ...) and how 
that could be handled (or tested) on LC servers means they would need 
LCLtd to be heavily involved.


And the other half of that project (i.e. providing infrastructure 
support for library/LCS stacks) in the IDE/engine is certainly outside 
the scope of a community project. For me, this includes things like


 - standard place to keep stacks/libraries  (e.g., maybe, My 
Livecode/Libraries ?)


 - preference to change that in IDE, perhaps specialFolderPath("libraries")

 - naming scheme or convention (cf what was done for widgets)

 - a "require" or "include" mechanism for dependencies in libraries

 - integration into the dictionary (cf widgets again)

 - ability to add e.g. custom controls to the toolbar (cf widgets).

and no doubt many others that I haven't even thought of.

Without those, I think we will continue to struggle with a limited set 
of community-provided libraries and tools, compared to the rich 
ecosystem this *incredibly helpful* community should be able to provide.


But, getting my head own out of the clouds, I've had a look at this as a 
community project - see separate email.


For anyone who got this far - thanks for your patience :-),

Alex.



Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 06/09/2021, 14:11, "use-livecode on behalf of Alex Tweedly via use-livecode" 
 wrote:

 In the main thread, I mentioned that I found revOnline (aka "Sample
 Stacks"), but didn't say how or why. Here the answer to that ...

 It has:

 - no differentiation between 'libraries' and 'examples'

 - it has no support for script-only stacks, which is surely the way most
 libraries will be done nowadays.

 - a left hand scrolling box with ~90 'categories', in no particular
 order, no grouping

 - grid vs list view - list shows you a list, which is basically the same
 as a 1-wide grid rather than 2-wide, plus a larger view of some random
 other item (OK, it's not random - it simply doesn't update when it should)

 - updates when you click on the picture - but gives no cursor hint that
 you can do that

 - a drop-down list for sort order - which isn't sized adequately when
 you first open revonline

 - a 'search' box which must search something, but I don't know what.
 There is a sample stack called "Compare stack scripts", and which is
 tagged as "compare" - but isn't found if you search for "compare".

 - and I usually find things via "browser + google" (or similar) and the
 stuff in samples stacks isn't visible that way.

 H - maybe I've just found my next project :-)

 Alex.


 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-10 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode



Lagi:

> My Laptop is SSD and still the problems.
> I have the problems with or without defender on.
> I don't use third party antivirus anymore

That's 2 out of 4 common steps!
Have you disabled the SE "bling" options?

Bling is slang for flashy expensive trinkets,
such as Live Errors and Auto Complete.

(I used to disable Colorization,
but it works fine with SSD.)

BTW, it's not necessary to go without antivirus.
The problem is certain newer intensive options
you can adjust in the antivirus settings.

I don't want people to read this thread
and disable antivirus entirely; be safe!

None of this is new; I listed 6 known factors
and one more would be too much code;
LC 7+ has performance issues that have been
noted for years and are still being fixed.

(I favor shorter code, and it has many perks.
This is just one of them.)

The IDE is not a high-performance design either.
Looks like one underlying issue may improve soon!
Others can be fixed readily if the LC Team
spends more time "hands on" using IDE on Windows.
Then the more rare and exotic bugs will trigger.

Yet another LC problem on Windows is that each launch
of each version of LC may launch a new Setup process
that hangs in memory. Over time, you can end up
with a dozen or more in memory eating up resources.
Check your Task Manager and thin the crowd.

Best wishes,

Curry Kenworthy

Custom Software Development
"Better Methods, Better Results"
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-09 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Hi Lagi

I just went back and repeated my steps from a couple of days ago.

New start for IDE, new stack, pasted in the same 8,000 lines as a comment.
And this time there was no slow down. So it does look like any such
problems are less predictable than my initial test suggested. I toggled on
then off all the options in the Script Editor related to autocomplete, etc.
And no matter what state they were in made no difference.  In the light of
this unreproduceability - how can LC be expected to identify/fix this
problem?   It may not even be within their control and certainly they can't
start to spend resources investigating it if the professional programmers
using LC on Win10 can't identify a predicable pattern.

I took my 8,000 lines of text and re-started the IDE multiple times. And
then I added 50% more to the comment. It does seem that the longer the
script is the more likely that your treacle problem is going to appear.
Perhaps if you tried this you could come up with a more definite pattern
and if so, then LC could look at why it is that a 8000, 12000, 18000 line
script causes a slow down.  With 12,000 lines even switching off all the
Edit/Options made no improvement: adding a return to a line took 3 seconds
for the screen to update.

What happens if you have a 24,000 line script? Do you get a predictable
pattern? Is it always slow?  Once you get a predictable recipe then LC Ltd
have something they can work on. Personally I'd find a 12,000 line script
really hard to navigate. But until LC Ltd specify that there's a length to
how long a script can be, there's no reason why you shouldn't have 12,000
line scripts.

Yesterday my Win10 laptop totally froze. I had open only two programmes: MS
OneNote and Chrome.  Even ctrl-alt-delete did nothing. I couldn't even
bring up task manager to see what could possibly be using all the
resources. After minutes of waiting for it to respond, I went to remove
battery and power cable (normal power button is set to hibernate not power
off), and suddenly it started to respond again. When I worked in tech
support I was the star problem solver. And now I've over 20 years more
experience with computing, but these days Windows 10 leaves me scratching
my head. MS have done some great things (WSL is one of them).

In my experience the weird behaviour I experience with Win10 is much, much
rarer on a Mac (I can't remember an incident in 20 years of using a variety
of Macs). On a different Win10 machine I have a well-know SQL editor.
Whenever it asks if I want to apply an update to it and I click "no", it
crashes. It's never been updated since I installed it. But this behaviour
only started a few months ago. To me that's really weird. When something
works I don't upgrade because it works as is.

Regards, Bernard

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:59 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Hi Bernard,
>
>
> I didn't make myself clear - it can work for hours with no slowdown at
> 13,000 lines on an older computer there is just no pattern.
>
> Lagi
>
> On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 18:54, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > I pasted 8000 lines of text into Script Editor on Windows (just 1 large
> > block comment).  On typing chars take a couple of seconds to appear once
> > there is that much text.  Cut it down to 800 lines and it's fine.
> >
> > With 8000 lines switch off "live errors" and the slow typing issue is
> gone.
> >
> > I've asked Erik to try with 8000 line comment on his 32GB rig, since he
> has
> > no problems. He might have to increase the size of the text in that field
> > to 12000 or 16000, but I suspect eventually he too will get your treacle.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > When it works it works - I cut the main stack to 7000 lines and still
> get
> > > the slowdown.
> > >
> > > When it slows down its the same treacle/quicksand/molasses whether the
> > > machine is a 10th gen with 16g or an 8gig pentium - when its fast its
> > fast
> > > on both - no consistency
> > >
> > > Lagi
> > >
> > >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
>
> --
> KIndest Regards Lagi
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Bernard,


I didn't make myself clear - it can work for hours with no slowdown at
13,000 lines on an older computer there is just no pattern.

Lagi

On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 18:54, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> I pasted 8000 lines of text into Script Editor on Windows (just 1 large
> block comment).  On typing chars take a couple of seconds to appear once
> there is that much text.  Cut it down to 800 lines and it's fine.
>
> With 8000 lines switch off "live errors" and the slow typing issue is gone.
>
> I've asked Erik to try with 8000 line comment on his 32GB rig, since he has
> no problems. He might have to increase the size of the text in that field
> to 12000 or 16000, but I suspect eventually he too will get your treacle.
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > When it works it works - I cut the main stack to 7000 lines and still get
> > the slowdown.
> >
> > When it slows down its the same treacle/quicksand/molasses whether the
> > machine is a 10th gen with 16g or an 8gig pentium - when its fast its
> fast
> > on both - no consistency
> >
> > Lagi
> >
> >
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Ali Lloyd via use-livecode
One thing to check is whether you are using a fixed width font, and if not
whether you have the same performance issue with the SE when using one.

On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, 18:52 Bernard Devlin via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> I pasted 8000 lines of text into Script Editor on Windows (just 1 large
> block comment).  On typing chars take a couple of seconds to appear once
> there is that much text.  Cut it down to 800 lines and it's fine.
>
> With 8000 lines switch off "live errors" and the slow typing issue is gone.
>
> I've asked Erik to try with 8000 line comment on his 32GB rig, since he has
> no problems. He might have to increase the size of the text in that field
> to 12000 or 16000, but I suspect eventually he too will get your treacle.
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > When it works it works - I cut the main stack to 7000 lines and still get
> > the slowdown.
> >
> > When it slows down its the same treacle/quicksand/molasses whether the
> > machine is a 10th gen with 16g or an 8gig pentium - when its fast its
> fast
> > on both - no consistency
> >
> > Lagi
> >
> >
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
I pasted 8000 lines of text into Script Editor on Windows (just 1 large
block comment).  On typing chars take a couple of seconds to appear once
there is that much text.  Cut it down to 800 lines and it's fine.

With 8000 lines switch off "live errors" and the slow typing issue is gone.

I've asked Erik to try with 8000 line comment on his 32GB rig, since he has
no problems. He might have to increase the size of the text in that field
to 12000 or 16000, but I suspect eventually he too will get your treacle.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:52 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> When it works it works - I cut the main stack to 7000 lines and still get
> the slowdown.
>
> When it slows down its the same treacle/quicksand/molasses whether the
> machine is a 10th gen with 16g or an 8gig pentium - when its fast its fast
> on both - no consistency
>
> Lagi
>
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I also have seen the autocomplete stop and start working, and that on a Mac. It 
may have something to do with the length of the script. I have also seen the 
extreme slowdown issue on Windows script editor and also in the performance. 
Most of the performance hit is in the frequent saves I inserted into my code to 
compensate for an old issue where the IDE would crash to desktop. But also I 
have tested sql queries, and they are also several times slower, as is 
populating datagrids and other things. 

As I have stated, I have done timing tests on several Windows platforms and 
have posted those results in the past, so I won't go through that exercise 
again. Suffice it to say that the Mac standalone I would be willing to market 
(if my code were good enough) but I would never attempt to market a Windows 
version of my code at this point. 

Bob S


> On Sep 8, 2021, at 08:47 , Lagi Pittas via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> I did some testing using the CPU% in the task manager - i was trying to do
> some more before sending in my results.
> It looks like if it has been running for some time but the time is not
> "quantified" at the moment as I have not been working
> on my project much these last few months.
> 
> When I do NOTICE the slowdown you cabn be sure i am not imagining seeing
> characters typing 1 per second or 2 or the debugger taking ages to go to
> the next step
> or the autocomplete stopping working even after a reboot and then starting
> again for no apparent reason.
> 
> Another real slowdown is when I have the project browser open or the
> messagebox - not always to the same extent or to the same sklowdown.
> 
> I will install 6 (although if I remember 6 was fine)
> 
> Regards Lagi
> 
> On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 13:14, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
>> May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows
>> (Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same
>> applies using LC 6.7?
>> 
>> It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or
>> whether it
>> came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific
>> speed
>> issues did.
>> 
>> Ben


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Curry,

My Laptop is SSD and still the problems. , I have the problems with or
without defender on.I don't use third party antivirus anymore
as (especially with norton that customers still bloody buy)  you get lots
of eyecandy bloat and headaches - the best antivirus i have is
the one between my  ears.

Lagi

On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 14:23, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> Ben:
>
>  > It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue,
>  > or whether it came in with the switch to LC7, as we know
>  > some other Windows-specific speed issues did.
>
> Not "it". Instead a combination:
>
> 1. LC 7 Engine Performance issues.
> 2. New Windows antivirus trends affecting disk access.
> 3. Mediocre LC SE design with excessive disk access.
> 4. Lack of LC Dev Team adequate Windows use/testing.
> 5. Fewer "High Roller" or "VIP" LC users focused on Windows.
> 6. New SE "wow" features built atop Mediocre LC SE design.
> 7. Perhaps others/still unknown.
>
> Long thread(s) about this previously including one by myself.
>
> Solutions for many:
>
> 1. Only use SSD, never HDD.
> 2. Tweak antivirus, disable intensive options.
> 3. Turn off some fancy newer SE bling options.
> 4. Adequate memory, optimize PC.
>
> I've had no problems since SSD.
>
> (But yeah, it's mostly mediocre IDE design + antivirus trends,
> plus Mac is the teacher's pet and favored platform.)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Curry Kenworthy
>
> Custom Software Development
> "Better Methods, Better Results"
> LiveCode Training and Consulting
> http://livecodeconsulting.com/
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Also can I make clear that I dont think it is the size of the script.

Originally I had a 2000 line library stack and 14000 line main stack

When it works it works - I cut the main stack to 7000 lines and still get
the slowdown.

When it slows down its the same treacle/quicksand/molasses whether the
machine is a 10th gen with 16g or an 8gig pentium - when its fast its fast
on both - no consistency

Lagi

On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 13:39, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Thanks Tiemo.
>
> I think it would help LiveCode address this issue if we knew two things:
> - if this is something that changed at some point, what was that
> point
> - if this doesn't affect everyone on Windows, what are the
> relevant distinctions
>
> In relation to the first question, if someone who is experiencing the
> problem
> was able to test using
>
> https://livecodestatic.com/downloads/livecode/7_0_0/LiveCodeInstaller-7_0_0-Windows.exe
> and
>
> https://livecodestatic.com/downloads/livecode/6_7_11/LiveCodeCommercialInstaller-6_7_11-Windows.exe
> and confirm whether there's a dramatic difference in IDE speed, that would
> help. (Unfortunately since the licensing changes, the available installers
> for
> these old versions require someone with a commercial license.)
>
> In relation to the second, by my count four people have now reported
> harrowingly slow IDE performance on Windows. I think at least two have
> said
> it's fine for them. Could we get a catalogue of the setups which do and
> don't
> experience the issue?
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 08/09/2021 13:26, Tiemo via use-livecode wrote:
> > The response of the IDE on Windows is harrowing slow. It's definitely no
> fun and is chilling for every newbe!
> > I tried all tweaks without result.
> >
> > For me the hassle started with LC 7 (if I remember right)
> >
> > Tiemo
> >
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: use-livecode  Im Auftrag
> von Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. September 2021 14:14
> > An: Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
> > Cc: Ben Rubinstein 
> > Betreff: Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community
> Edition)
> >
> > May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows
> (Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same
> applies using LC 6.7?
> >
> > It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or
> whether it came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other
> Windows-specific speed issues did.
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:
> >> I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit
> of jank. Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a
> Mac. The worse offender is the script editor though.
> >>
> >>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
> >>> --
> >>> Scott Morrow
> >>>
> >>>> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it
> caused me to switch back to a mac...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> use-livecode mailing list
> >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> use-livecode mailing list
> >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Ben,

I did some testing using the CPU% in the task manager - i was trying to do
some more before sending in my results.
It looks like if it has been running for some time but the time is not
"quantified" at the moment as I have not been working
on my project much these last few months.

When I do NOTICE the slowdown you cabn be sure i am not imagining seeing
characters typing 1 per second or 2 or the debugger taking ages to go to
the next step
or the autocomplete stopping working even after a reboot and then starting
again for no apparent reason.

Another real slowdown is when I have the project browser open or the
messagebox - not always to the same extent or to the same sklowdown.

I will install 6 (although if I remember 6 was fine)

Regards Lagi

On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 13:14, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows
> (Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same
> applies using LC 6.7?
>
> It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or
> whether it
> came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific
> speed
> issues did.
>
> Ben
>
> On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:
> > I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit
> of jank. Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a
> Mac. The worse offender is the script editor though.
> >
> >> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
> >> --
> >> Scott Morrow
> >>
> >>> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused
> me to switch back to a mac...
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> use-livecode mailing list
> >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I don't use 6.7 anymore, but no, they do not. At least not to the degree they 
do now. 

Bob S


> On Sep 8, 2021, at 05:13 , Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows 
> (Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same 
> applies using LC 6.7?
> 
> It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or whether 
> it came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific 
> speed issues did.
> 
> Ben
> 
> On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:
>> I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit of 
>> jank. Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a 
>> Mac. The worse offender is the script editor though.
>>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
>>> --
>>> Scott Morrow
>>> 
 On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
  wrote:
 
 to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me 
 to switch back to a mac...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode



Ben:

> It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue,
> or whether it came in with the switch to LC7, as we know
> some other Windows-specific speed issues did.

Not "it". Instead a combination:

1. LC 7 Engine Performance issues.
2. New Windows antivirus trends affecting disk access.
3. Mediocre LC SE design with excessive disk access.
4. Lack of LC Dev Team adequate Windows use/testing.
5. Fewer "High Roller" or "VIP" LC users focused on Windows.
6. New SE "wow" features built atop Mediocre LC SE design.
7. Perhaps others/still unknown.

Long thread(s) about this previously including one by myself.

Solutions for many:

1. Only use SSD, never HDD.
2. Tweak antivirus, disable intensive options.
3. Turn off some fancy newer SE bling options.
4. Adequate memory, optimize PC.

I've had no problems since SSD.

(But yeah, it's mostly mediocre IDE design + antivirus trends,
plus Mac is the teacher's pet and favored platform.)

Best wishes,

Curry Kenworthy

Custom Software Development
"Better Methods, Better Results"
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode

Thanks Tiemo.

I think it would help LiveCode address this issue if we knew two things:
- if this is something that changed at some point, what was that point
- if this doesn't affect everyone on Windows, what are the relevant 
distinctions

In relation to the first question, if someone who is experiencing the problem 
was able to test using


https://livecodestatic.com/downloads/livecode/7_0_0/LiveCodeInstaller-7_0_0-Windows.exe
and

https://livecodestatic.com/downloads/livecode/6_7_11/LiveCodeCommercialInstaller-6_7_11-Windows.exe
and confirm whether there's a dramatic difference in IDE speed, that would 
help. (Unfortunately since the licensing changes, the available installers for 
these old versions require someone with a commercial license.)


In relation to the second, by my count four people have now reported 
harrowingly slow IDE performance on Windows. I think at least two have said 
it's fine for them. Could we get a catalogue of the setups which do and don't 
experience the issue?


Ben


On 08/09/2021 13:26, Tiemo via use-livecode wrote:

The response of the IDE on Windows is harrowing slow. It's definitely no fun 
and is chilling for every newbe!
I tried all tweaks without result.

For me the hassle started with LC 7 (if I remember right)

Tiemo


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode  Im Auftrag von Ben 
Rubinstein via use-livecode
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. September 2021 14:14
An: Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
Cc: Ben Rubinstein 
Betreff: Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows 
(Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same 
applies using LC 6.7?

It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or whether it 
came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific speed 
issues did.

Ben

On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:

I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit of jank. 
Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a Mac. The 
worse offender is the script editor though.


On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode 
 wrote:

Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
--
Scott Morrow


On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
 wrote:

to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me to 
switch back to a mac...



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


AW: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Tiemo via use-livecode
The response of the IDE on Windows is harrowing slow. It's definitely no fun 
and is chilling for every newbe!
I tried all tweaks without result.

For me the hassle started with LC 7 (if I remember right)

Tiemo


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: use-livecode  Im Auftrag von Ben 
Rubinstein via use-livecode
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. September 2021 14:14
An: Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
Cc: Ben Rubinstein 
Betreff: Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows 
(Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same 
applies using LC 6.7?

It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or whether it 
came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific speed 
issues did.

Ben

On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:
> I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit of 
> jank. Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a Mac. 
> The worse offender is the script editor though.
> 
>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
>> --
>> Scott Morrow
>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me 
>>> to switch back to a mac...
>>
>>
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode
May I repeat my request that anyone experiencing these issues on Windows 
(Andre, Lagi, Bob), could if possible confirm whether they find the same 
applies using LC 6.7?


It would be good to understand if this has always been an issue, or whether it 
came in with the switch to LC7, as we know some other Windows-specific speed 
issues did.


Ben

On 08/09/2021 11:17, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:

I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit of jank. 
Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a Mac. The 
worse offender is the script editor though.


On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode 
 wrote:

Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
--
Scott Morrow


On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
 wrote:

to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me to 
switch back to a mac...



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-08 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
I mean the script editor mostly but also the rest of the ide has a bit of jank. 
Laying out interfaces on Windows has been worse than doing it on a Mac. The 
worse offender is the script editor though.

> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:28, Scott Morrow via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
> --
> Scott Morrow
> 
>> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me to 
>> switch back to a mac...
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Scott Morrow via use-livecode
Andre, when you say “so bad” do you mean the script editor or… ?
--
Scott Morrow

> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me to 
> switch back to a mac...


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Stephen Barncard via use-livecode
;>>> who want to give it a good try.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with
> an OK
> >>>> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> >>>> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
> >>>>
> >>>> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running
> >>> on a
> >>>> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs
> like
> >>>> treacle.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
> >>> less
> >>>> than 30 minutes.
> >>>>
> >>>> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
> >>> to
> >>>> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
> >>>>
> >>>> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost -
> and
> >>>> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> >>>> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
> >>> idea
> >>>> of the lot so far)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> >>>> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
> >>>>
> >>>> Lagi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> >>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
> >>> give a
> >>>>> longer trial a shot at some point.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kevin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> >>>>> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> >>>>> use-livecode"  >>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> True, true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
> >>> around
> >>>>> but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> >>>>> programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> >>>>> supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> >>>> would
> >>>>> not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> >>> option.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ralph DiMola
> >>>>> IT Director
> >>>>> Evergreen Information Services
> >>>>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Original Message-
> >>>>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com
> ]
> >>> On
> >>>>> Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> >>>>> To: How to use LiveCode
> >>>>> Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> >>>>> non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> >>>>> download that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kevin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> >>>>> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael
> >>> Kristensen
> >>>>> via use-livecode"  of
> >>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   

Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Yes, and this is really disconcerting. Not sure how many Mac vs. PC devs there 
are for LC, but I suspect it's weighed heavily towards Mac. I think in 
retrospect, it may have been better to retain UTF-8 as an option, that is be 
able to select unicode or not in an app. But I suspect that would be a lot of 
bloat in the IDE. 

Bob S


> On Sep 7, 2021, at 12:55 , Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> to be honest, the IDE on Windows has been so bad for me that it caused me to 
> switch back to a mac...
> 
>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 09:00, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> I was wondering this too: when Lagi mentioned 'fix the IDE' I thought this 
>> might be a reference to some of a number of usabiity snags - it didn't occur 
>> to me that it was just speed.
>> 
>> I develop on a nine-year old MacBook and have never noticed a speed issue 
>> with the IDE. I wonder if it's possible that the Windows IDE has been 
>> affected by the same issue to do with manipulating quantities of text that 
>> I've been talking about on the list, which Mark W has suggested might be 
>> fixed in a release very shortly? (Seems unlikely!) But definitely seems to 
>> be something platform specific.
>> 
>> Lagi, if you're still able to access a 6.7 installer, could you confirm 
>> whether the IDE under 6.7 has the same problem on your set up? The problems 
>> with speed on Windows that I'm seeing came in after 6.7.
>> 
>> Ben


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
oday as a new person it would be off my machine in
>>> less
>>>> than 30 minutes.
>>>> 
>>>> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
>>> to
>>>> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>>>> 
>>>> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
>>>> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
>>>> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
>>> idea
>>>> of the lot so far)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
>>>> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>>>> 
>>>> Lagi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
>>> give a
>>>>> longer trial a shot at some point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
>>>>> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
>>>>> use-livecode" >>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> True, true.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
>>> around
>>>>> but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
>>>>> programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
>>>>> supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
>>>> would
>>>>> not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
>>> option.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ralph DiMola
>>>>> IT Director
>>>>> Evergreen Information Services
>>>>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com]
>>> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
>>>>> To: How to use LiveCode
>>>>> Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
>>>>> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
>>>>> non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
>>>>> download that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
>>>>> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael
>>> Kristensen
>>>>> via use-livecode" >>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi there
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community
>>> Edition
>>>>> 
>>>>> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Michael
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> KIndest Regards Lagi
>>>> ___
>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread e.beugelaar--- via use-livecode
I hv never had slowdowns with the IDE or else in Windows 10.
But my system has 32 Gb internal RAM and I use only NVMe. Fastest i7 too. No 
problems.
Its all about hardware when u develop software.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Erik Beugelaar

From: use-livecode  on behalf of Bernard 
Devlin via use-livecode 
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 7:08:09 PM
To: How to use LiveCode 
Cc: Bernard Devlin 
Subject: Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

Without knowing anything other than "the IDE is like treacle"  I loaded
various stacks in Windows to see what the complaint could possibly be about.
8 seconds for IDE to start - no treacle on opening stacks
8 seconds to open Dictionary - no treacle on searching Dictionary (given
it's loading 1000 pages of lightning-fast searchable text, I think 8
seconds isn't too bad).  I generally open it once and don't shut it until I
close LC.

So I created a new stack and pasted 8000 lines of text into the Script
Editor.  Typing in the Editor then became treacley (but not on OS X).
Switching off Edit/Options/live errors removed any speed degradation on
typing.  Assuming I've correctly identified where the issue is, the issue
is not the IDE, the issue is doing something specific with large scripts
inside the Script Editor.  That may well be the issue that Mark Waddingham
was discussing about sorting text.  The Script editor doesn't slow down
with 100s of lines.

As for general weirdness with Windows. When Windows "anti-virus" scam kicks
in every day, my laptop stops working (even trying to switch between apps
is treacley).  This is something MS have made almost impossible to disable
(I haven't found a way), and I can't set the priority low. I just have to
leave the laptop for an hour and go to do something else.  Someone trying
to save a file during this scan is likely to experience slow file saves.
I've also seen Windows Update taking large amounts of RAM.  These things
are less noticeable on my Windows desktop.

Regards, Bernard

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:15 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> It's worse than the unicode text issue. Saving stacks is from my setup 7
> to 8 times slower in Windows than on a Mac, and I have tried numerous
> Windows configurations from bare metal to VMWare servers running on a
> robust host. In discussions in the past, it seems there isn't a lot
> Livecode can do about it. The issues are with Windows itself. At least that
> was the upshot of the discussions.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Sep 3, 2021, at 06:56 , Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering this too: when Lagi mentioned 'fix the IDE' I thought
> this might be a reference to some of a number of usabiity snags - it didn't
> occur to me that it was just speed.
> >
> > I develop on a nine-year old MacBook and have never noticed a speed
> issue with the IDE. I wonder if it's possible that the Windows IDE has been
> affected by the same issue to do with manipulating quantities of text that
> I've been talking about on the list, which Mark W has suggested might be
> fixed in a release very shortly? (Seems unlikely!) But definitely seems to
> be something platform specific.
> >
> > Lagi, if you're still able to access a 6.7 installer, could you confirm
> whether the IDE under 6.7 has the same problem on your set up? The problems
> with speed on Windows that I'm seeing came in after 6.7.
> >
> > Ben
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Without knowing anything other than "the IDE is like treacle"  I loaded
various stacks in Windows to see what the complaint could possibly be about.
8 seconds for IDE to start - no treacle on opening stacks
8 seconds to open Dictionary - no treacle on searching Dictionary (given
it's loading 1000 pages of lightning-fast searchable text, I think 8
seconds isn't too bad).  I generally open it once and don't shut it until I
close LC.

So I created a new stack and pasted 8000 lines of text into the Script
Editor.  Typing in the Editor then became treacley (but not on OS X).
Switching off Edit/Options/live errors removed any speed degradation on
typing.  Assuming I've correctly identified where the issue is, the issue
is not the IDE, the issue is doing something specific with large scripts
inside the Script Editor.  That may well be the issue that Mark Waddingham
was discussing about sorting text.  The Script editor doesn't slow down
with 100s of lines.

As for general weirdness with Windows. When Windows "anti-virus" scam kicks
in every day, my laptop stops working (even trying to switch between apps
is treacley).  This is something MS have made almost impossible to disable
(I haven't found a way), and I can't set the priority low. I just have to
leave the laptop for an hour and go to do something else.  Someone trying
to save a file during this scan is likely to experience slow file saves.
I've also seen Windows Update taking large amounts of RAM.  These things
are less noticeable on my Windows desktop.

Regards, Bernard

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:15 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> It's worse than the unicode text issue. Saving stacks is from my setup 7
> to 8 times slower in Windows than on a Mac, and I have tried numerous
> Windows configurations from bare metal to VMWare servers running on a
> robust host. In discussions in the past, it seems there isn't a lot
> Livecode can do about it. The issues are with Windows itself. At least that
> was the upshot of the discussions.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Sep 3, 2021, at 06:56 , Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering this too: when Lagi mentioned 'fix the IDE' I thought
> this might be a reference to some of a number of usabiity snags - it didn't
> occur to me that it was just speed.
> >
> > I develop on a nine-year old MacBook and have never noticed a speed
> issue with the IDE. I wonder if it's possible that the Windows IDE has been
> affected by the same issue to do with manipulating quantities of text that
> I've been talking about on the list, which Mark W has suggested might be
> fixed in a release very shortly? (Seems unlikely!) But definitely seems to
> be something platform specific.
> >
> > Lagi, if you're still able to access a 6.7 installer, could you confirm
> whether the IDE under 6.7 has the same problem on your set up? The problems
> with speed on Windows that I'm seeing came in after 6.7.
> >
> > Ben
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-07 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Two words: Unicode. 

Bob S


> On Sep 2, 2021, at 15:20 , Lagi Pittas via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Sorry it's worse than I thought.It's 10th generation with 4 cores and 8
> logical processors.
> 
> Appleworks was blazingly fast on my 64K 1Mhz Apple 2  and so was Borland
> Turbo Pascal on my Microsoft Z80 card on said machine - software is going
> backwards speed wise.
> 
> Lagi
> 
> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 23:00, Tom Glod via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
>> Lagi,
>> 
>> I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
>> points needing to be addressed.
>> 
>> Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.
>> 
>> Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
>> platform?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
>>> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
>>> way
>>> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
>>> 
>>> You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
>>> and by the time they answer
>>> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
>>> 
>>> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
>>> (whichever comes first).
>>> 
>>> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
>>> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
>>> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice
>> so
>>> it will last 30 days.
>>> 
>>> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
>>> rushing.
>>> 
>>> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
>>> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
>>> who want to give it a good try.
>>> 
>>> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
>>> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
>>> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
>>> 
>>> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running
>> on a
>>> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
>>> treacle.
>>> 
>>> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
>> less
>>> than 30 minutes.
>>> 
>>> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
>> to
>>> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>>> 
>>> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
>>> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
>>> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
>> idea
>>> of the lot so far)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
>>> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>>> 
>>> Lagi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
>> give a
>>>> longer trial a shot at some point.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Kevin
>>>> 
>>>> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
>>>> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>>>> 
>>>> On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
>>>> use-livecode" >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>True, true.
>>>> 
>>>>There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
>> around
>>>> but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
>>>> programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
>>>> supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
>>> would
>>>> not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
>> option.
>>>> 
>>>>

Re: IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-07 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
It's worse than the unicode text issue. Saving stacks is from my setup 7 to 8 
times slower in Windows than on a Mac, and I have tried numerous Windows 
configurations from bare metal to VMWare servers running on a robust host. In 
discussions in the past, it seems there isn't a lot Livecode can do about it. 
The issues are with Windows itself. At least that was the upshot of the 
discussions. 

Bob S


> On Sep 3, 2021, at 06:56 , Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> I was wondering this too: when Lagi mentioned 'fix the IDE' I thought this 
> might be a reference to some of a number of usabiity snags - it didn't occur 
> to me that it was just speed.
> 
> I develop on a nine-year old MacBook and have never noticed a speed issue 
> with the IDE. I wonder if it's possible that the Windows IDE has been 
> affected by the same issue to do with manipulating quantities of text that 
> I've been talking about on the list, which Mark W has suggested might be 
> fixed in a release very shortly? (Seems unlikely!) But definitely seems to be 
> something platform specific.
> 
> Lagi, if you're still able to access a 6.7 installer, could you confirm 
> whether the IDE under 6.7 has the same problem on your set up? The problems 
> with speed on Windows that I'm seeing came in after 6.7.
> 
> Ben


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-07 Thread Heather Laine via use-livecode
Folks,

Thank you for all your input on this subject. I think everyone has now had an 
opportunity to express opinions, discuss, and understand the changes. As Kevin 
has said previously, if you have constructive ideas on how to improve our new 
model, please do send them to him direct. Naturally people here have strong 
feelings about LiveCode and the direction it should take in the future. I would 
beg that we remain polite, helpful and constructive in expressing such 
opinions. 

I think everything that needs to be said has now been said. I believe it is now 
time to return to the purpose of this list, supporting each other in using 
LiveCode. 

Warmest regards to all,

Heather

Your friendly local listmom.

Heather Laine
Customer Services Manager
LiveCode Ltd
www.livecode.com



> On 7 Sep 2021, at 08:33, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:13 AM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Another company's software I used for visual Foxpro and Delphi over the
>> years was
>> 
>> https://www.chilkatsoft.com/
>> 
>> Look at all the languages they support and livecode isn't on there [...]
>> VB.NET, VB6, VBScript, Xbase++, xHarbour, Xojo
>> 
>> The question is why Livecode isn't there?
>> 
>> Lagi
>> 
> 
> The question is: have YOU lobbied chilkat to build an interface for
> Livecode?  I did. I got no reply.
> 
> But when I bought my chilkat license (some years before I lobbied them)
> something went wrong with the payment (my bank cancelled the payment as
> "suspicious").  I got the vilest email from a company I've ever had,
> accusing me of fraud and telling me how the developer would get his own
> back.  His response is seared into my memory (I excused his awful behaviour
> by telling myself "hmm he must have had a significant number of people
> ripping him off with this software"). Despite his vile email, I arranged
> for payment with a different credit card. But when I didn't get a response
> from him re Livecode I decided I'd been too nice in excusing his bad
> behaviour.  By contrast, every email I've ever sent to LC Ltd has resulted
> in a prompt and courteous reply.
> 
> Perhaps if you spent as much time lobbying Chilkat as you spend denigrating
> LC Ltd you might find LC among the software supported by Chilkat?  I doubt
> the developer of Chilkat would allow you on his forum to repeatedly
> denigrate him and his software, criticising his company for supporting
> Filemaker than implementing something you want.
> 
> Once again, if "the opensource community", supposedly "the largest
> demographic", are not at least using their time to lobby e.g. Chilkat to
> provide a Livecode interface, then are they beneficial or are they just a
> drain?  To date the only Livecode user we know who spent time to lobby
> Chilkat is also one of those who is not a free-loader but one who has been
> a license-payer for decades.  What are the scores/hundreds of freeloaders
> doing with their time?
> 
> Regards, Bernard
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-07 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:13 AM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> Another company's software I used for visual Foxpro and Delphi over the
> years was
>
> https://www.chilkatsoft.com/
>
> Look at all the languages they support and livecode isn't on there [...]
> VB.NET, VB6, VBScript, Xbase++, xHarbour, Xojo
>
> The question is why Livecode isn't there?
>
> Lagi
>

The question is: have YOU lobbied chilkat to build an interface for
Livecode?  I did. I got no reply.

But when I bought my chilkat license (some years before I lobbied them)
something went wrong with the payment (my bank cancelled the payment as
"suspicious").  I got the vilest email from a company I've ever had,
accusing me of fraud and telling me how the developer would get his own
back.  His response is seared into my memory (I excused his awful behaviour
by telling myself "hmm he must have had a significant number of people
ripping him off with this software"). Despite his vile email, I arranged
for payment with a different credit card. But when I didn't get a response
from him re Livecode I decided I'd been too nice in excusing his bad
behaviour.  By contrast, every email I've ever sent to LC Ltd has resulted
in a prompt and courteous reply.

Perhaps if you spent as much time lobbying Chilkat as you spend denigrating
LC Ltd you might find LC among the software supported by Chilkat?  I doubt
the developer of Chilkat would allow you on his forum to repeatedly
denigrate him and his software, criticising his company for supporting
Filemaker than implementing something you want.

Once again, if "the opensource community", supposedly "the largest
demographic", are not at least using their time to lobby e.g. Chilkat to
provide a Livecode interface, then are they beneficial or are they just a
drain?  To date the only Livecode user we know who spent time to lobby
Chilkat is also one of those who is not a free-loader but one who has been
a license-payer for decades.  What are the scores/hundreds of freeloaders
doing with their time?

Regards, Bernard
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Actually their link is not correct - press on the extras icon - Monkeybread
does some awesome addons
and keeps them upto date.

Some are included put some go way past both the builtin XOJO and LC
"widgets"


Another company's software I used for visual Foxpro and Delphi over the
years was

https://www.chilkatsoft.com/

Look at all the languages they support and livecode isn't on there - they
still support Foxpro which hasn't been developed for 15 years.


ASP, C, C++, C++ Builder, C#, DataFlex, dBase, Delphi, Electron, Excel,
FoxPro,

Java, Mono, Node.js, Objective-C, Perl, PHP, PowerBuilder, PowerShell,
PureBasic, Python, Ruby, SQL, Swift, Tcl,

VB.NET, VB6, VBScript, Xbase++, xHarbour, Xojo

The question is why Livecode isn't there?

Lagi




On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 19:54, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> On 06/09/2021 19:07, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
> > The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a
> > "working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up
> on.
> Not sure that's the "biggest" - but yes, I agree it looks unloved.
> > Look at the addons created for XOJO  - and XOJO makes money on those
> >
> >
> > https://xojo.com/store/
> > https://www.monkeybreadsoftware.de/
>
> I see a lot of add-ons (for an awful lot of money) for things that come
> built-in with Livecode.
>
> (tongue in cheek) Maybe LCLtd should have the same add-ons page as Xojo,
> but each of them says
>
> "$0   already included"
>
> Alex.
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Actually I wasn't particularly addressing you. For one thing, I'll wager
you've got hundreds of posts on the Forum.

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:09 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> My biggest "whine" is not the ending of the open source initiative - it's
> the fact that OUR biggest competitors (XOJO and B4X) have non expiring
> licences and at least a non time limited "trial" version.
>
>
Xojo and B4X are not my competitors. I am not LC Ltd. If you think these
technologies are so interchangeable I don't know why you're persisting with
the one that runs "like treacle".  I don't have a license for either of
those Basics.  And if you see them as "our competitors", why fund the
competition.  Very strange IMO.  LC fits into my philosophy of software
design at a specific location (I have never even tried to run it inside a
webserver, there are better technologies for that).

Your biggest whine is that the IDE "runs like treacle", even on beefy
hardware.  I asked for evidence of this, because in 20 years on non-beefy
hardware I've never seen it.  I'm still waiting to see what problem you've
got.  No-one else appears to recognize your complaint.


> Calling people parasites because they want the open source to continue (but
> with better differentiation) is not constructive.
>

People who  wanted open source to continue had 8 years of opportunities.  I
used to muse every time Panos sent out an email with "easy fixes to the
documentation"  hmm, how many of those who contribute nothing financial
to this project can even be bothered to spend some time fixing some
documentation.  Clearly most people wanted open source so they could spend
their time and money on other things than supporting the technology with
either finance or money.  Within a couple of months of InterBase opening
their source code and entirely new database project was born. Not so with
Livecode.

What word do you use for people who take and take for 8 years then have a
hissy fit when they are told they aren't getting any more freebies because
their freebies have just been a drain on resources.

The starter system is easy (very easy).
>

LC is the business of LC Ltd. It's not your business. It's not my business.
Please feel free to look back over my posts in the last 20 years to see
where I've told them how to run their business. The one time I did contact
Heather, was to draw her attention to one of the whining threads on the
Forum, and to pull from it a trio of suggestions for improvement.  But I
did this in private rather than create lots of public whining with which to
put off potential/actual users.


> The future is the kids and the only way of capturing them is to make it
> easy for them to send out a link to a program they wrote to friends and
> family to show off what they did.
>

I very much doubt this.  There are dozens of less impressive technologies
than LC for kids to learn. "Worse is better", and all that. IMO the idea
that we need to "think of the children" is a myth. I've seen this topic of
Livecode and Education discussed for 20 years.

As there are some on this list who have been around even longer than I, it
seems like we should have an answer to this question: how many people have
you encountered here or on the Forum who learned about LC through formal
schooling (school or university) and are using it in later life?  In my
case it is zero. I cannot recollect anyone on this mailing list or on the
Forum who has stated that this was their introduction to Livecode.

If it turns out that there is no such person, then there's little point in
LC Ltd worrying about the idea that this is a channel that brings in new
long-term users (as those on the Forum claim). The only reason for
providing any version aimed at those in education should be the money such
a thing would bring in as an end in itself.


> The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a
> "working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up
> on.
>

*De gustibus non est disputandum.  *I think there's very, very little wrong
with Livecode.com.  What is it that you have tried to do with their website
that you couldn't do?  Maybe you don't like the font, or the text, or the
graphics, or whatever.  But such generic criticism is of no help and is
just barking at the moon.

IMO the most important thing for them to add to the website is a few short
(hi-res) videos showing some apps being developed in LC.  That was one of
the few *specific and constructive points* I made (in private) to Heather.

Regards, Bernard
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread prothero--- via use-livecode
Folks:
I’ve been following this thread and have a few thoughts I decided to share.

Interestingly, I don’t see Android support for XOJO. Hmm….

In my case (I have a Commercial license), I am really happy that version 10 of 
LC will be improving the web software. I’ve been thinking about diving into 
that realm, but have a couple of projects I’m pecking away at, for now. I also 
like the idea of improving the access and documentation of code libraries. 
Seems odd that audio recording is still not supported on Apple OS’s.

I’ve programmed in several languages, including Fortran, Pascal, Basic, 
Hypercard and Lingo (maybe others I’ve forgotten about). For me, the “English 
Language” coding claim is over-sold (“put 3 into x” vs "x=3” doesn’t thrill me 
either way). Once I get beyond the “Hello World” part of LC, it goes well 
beyond English language. If thens, Switch, for next, global, arrays, etc are 
common in all languages. To do anything beyond elementary requires digging into 
the docs. However, the multi-platform, iOS, Android capabilities and the 
fabulous way interface items (buttons, fields, etc) are easily built, is huge. 
I also appreciate that the app building procedures have gotten a bit more 
straightforward, with community help. I love that I can load an iOS app 
directly onto my phone for testing.

I use Livecode for my personal projects and one that is pretty big that I give 
away for free. It’s one of my hobbies and a way to, in a small way, pay back 
for the significant money I received from the National Science Foundation to 
develop educational software and strategies during my pre-retirement years. I’m 
happy to pay for my perpetual commercial license. I’m interested in education. 
I’d love to see a well documented framework that can be built on, that connects 
livecode projects to course management systems and has options that can be 
included to perform basic classroom tasks. Education would be the focus.

Best to all livecoders,

Bill Prothero

> On Sep 6, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/09/2021 19:07, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
>> The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a
>> "working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up on.
> Not sure that's the "biggest" - but yes, I agree it looks unloved.
>> Look at the addons created for XOJO  - and XOJO makes money on those
>> 
>> 
>> https://xojo.com/store/
>> https://www.monkeybreadsoftware.de/
> 
> I see a lot of add-ons (for an awful lot of money) for things that come 
> built-in with Livecode.
> 
> (tongue in cheek) Maybe LCLtd should have the same add-ons page as Xojo, but 
> each of them says
> 
>"$0   already included"
> 
> Alex.
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

William A. Prothero, Ph.D.
University of California, Santa Barbara Dept. of Earth Sciences (Emeritus)
Santa Barbara, CA. 93105
http://earthlearningsolutions.org/


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode


On 06/09/2021 19:07, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:

The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a
"working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up on.

Not sure that's the "biggest" - but yes, I agree it looks unloved.

Look at the addons created for XOJO  - and XOJO makes money on those


https://xojo.com/store/
https://www.monkeybreadsoftware.de/


I see a lot of add-ons (for an awful lot of money) for things that come 
built-in with Livecode.


(tongue in cheek) Maybe LCLtd should have the same add-ons page as Xojo, 
but each of them says


   "$0   already included"

Alex.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Bernard,

I could be called one of the whiners but I have paid my indy licence since
the kickstarter and the business Upgrade (until a year ago - Incase I
needed it - I didnt).

My biggest "whine" is not the ending of the open source initiative - it's
the fact that OUR biggest competitors (XOJO and B4X) have non expiring
licences and at least a non time limited "trial" version.

B4X went open source not too long ago and only charges for the IOS version
and a nice donate $10, $20, $40, $100 on each page.

No people can't be bothered to get in-touch to pay unless some itch was
just scratched - Have sent money for free stuff that I have used only once
when they got me out of a sticky situation..
I use paypal whenever I can so I don't have to get involved with entering
CVS or other "screening" make it easy and people will pay - "Don't make me
think".

Calling people parasites because they want the open source to continue (but
with better differentiation) is not constructive.

I think they should have open sourced the Linux , Windows and NOT the
mobile and only allowed sqlite in the open source versions.

You can do everything but when you want to get serious you have to pay.

If the Mobile was (of teh top of my head) priced like Xojo and the "lite"
version two without expiring so it is in livecodes interests to add value
yearly rather than fix old or regressive bugs
then people would renew yearly if there was a discount for an unbroken
subscription.

The starter system is easy (very easy)

The full lite version (windows, Mac or Linux)  with a limited binary size -
big enough for kids and schools to write useful programs but not so you
could write a full sales purchase nominal ledger
(see BBC Basic for  windows)

You could have not a nag screen but a text link in the bottom right corner
with a link to a page saying 50% discount (or whatever) for first year.

The suggestion Kevin gave that people would share stacks to run ignores the
fact that somebody wants the banana (the App/stack) and must install the
Gorilla (2G installer).

Anybody who would bother is the type who doesn't value their time so isn't
going to buy anything however cheap.

The future is the kids and the only way of capturing them is to make it
easy for them to send out a link to a program they wrote to friends and
family to show off what they did.
Make the binary big enough so that a side scroller can be written but such
that they would have to balance internal and external graphics.

A arter system does can be limited to 1 printer,  output to 1 pdf file per
session/ run / 18-20MB windows binary (at least it should be able to run
many of the programs written as games on the samples site)

But the biggest "limitation" and the best advert is the link to livecode
on the screen for a gui project and a 3 to 5 second popup for a
console type program.

The biggest error livecode has made all these years is not creating a
"working" storefront that doesn't look like it has been totally given up on.

Look at the addons created for XOJO  - and XOJO makes money on those


https://xojo.com/store/
https://www.monkeybreadsoftware.de/

I still prefer livecode for a lot of reasons but I could easily jump ship
(as I have non expiring licenses for both of these ) two of which I
purchased this year - just because.

Regards lagi


On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 16:05, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:08 PM Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > We have dabbled with a number of low cost /entry level offerings in the
> > past. There used to be a starter kit that allowed only a certain number
> of
> > lines of code per object. We had non-standalone building products e.g.
> > DreamCard/revMedia. None of these models have worked well for a long list
> > of reasons - indeed they caused huge issues for us. This problem is much
> > harder to solve than you might think. Will we continue to refine our
> entry
> > level offering? Yes definitely. Specific suggestions in this area are
> > welcome, particularly directly to me rather than on here.
> >
>
> Those of us who've been around since the days of Metacard knew this. It was
> precisely why I haven't chimed in with "what LC should do", because I know
> they've been prepared to evaluate so many different approaches.  Many years
> ago the Ambassador from Fourthworld said: "it's their company to run, I
> concentrate on running my business". I tried weeks ago saying that to
> whiners on the forum, but it made no difference.  Even after Kevin posted
> the remarks below days ago, they are still playing CEO (as Andre so pithily
> puts it).
>
> To those who were repeatedly whining I pointed out: we don't have the data
> that LC Ltd has, they know what has worked/failed, they know what marketing
> has worked/failed; and they have more interest in the success of LC than
> any of us customers have, so we should respect that and support 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:08 PM Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> We have dabbled with a number of low cost /entry level offerings in the
> past. There used to be a starter kit that allowed only a certain number of
> lines of code per object. We had non-standalone building products e.g.
> DreamCard/revMedia. None of these models have worked well for a long list
> of reasons - indeed they caused huge issues for us. This problem is much
> harder to solve than you might think. Will we continue to refine our entry
> level offering? Yes definitely. Specific suggestions in this area are
> welcome, particularly directly to me rather than on here.
>

Those of us who've been around since the days of Metacard knew this. It was
precisely why I haven't chimed in with "what LC should do", because I know
they've been prepared to evaluate so many different approaches.  Many years
ago the Ambassador from Fourthworld said: "it's their company to run, I
concentrate on running my business". I tried weeks ago saying that to
whiners on the forum, but it made no difference.  Even after Kevin posted
the remarks below days ago, they are still playing CEO (as Andre so pithily
puts it).

To those who were repeatedly whining I pointed out: we don't have the data
that LC Ltd has, they know what has worked/failed, they know what marketing
has worked/failed; and they have more interest in the success of LC than
any of us customers have, so we should respect that and support them in it.

Some of the whiners won't listen to reason. I got to the point where I gave
up trying to debate these issues, for no sooner had I reasoned why some
claim they'd made was wrong and a week later they were back making the same
claim.  It is annoying to see people who've never sold so much as a piece
of fruit constantly running down the company whose products they use.

LC is a very unusual development tool, virtually in a class of its own.
Communicating this uniqueness (and why the unique properties are so
important) to novices and even very experienced developers is a challenge.
With Xojo or B4X you can say "this is a cross-platform relative of Visual
Basic", and people who've had even a little programming experience in the
past 30 years will understand what they are dealing with. These days I'd
guess that 95% of Apple users don't even know the meaning of "Hypercard" or
"Applescript".  There's simply no frame of reference.  Twenty years ago I
gave a programming colleague a copy of The Hypercard Book and the Metacard
starter kit. With book in hand she said she couldn't get her head around
Metacard and gave up (and she'd been using RAD tools for a decade).  I got
her to try Revolution a year or two later, and she still couldn't
understand it.  She ended up becoming a Filemaker developer.  I've come to
the conclusion that the only option is videos that demonstrate apps being
constructed, this might at least appeal at a superficial level. I can't
think of another way to start to indicate what the tool is like. I think
this might be worth some investment.  In fact, in a discussion recently I
cited the idea of a high quality video showing Andre's calculator example.
I think I wrote to Heather about this some weeks ago.

Regards, Bernard
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Keith Martin via use-livecode
> On Sep 6, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> I’m happy paying for my license because I can see the value LC provides me, 
> and how my money directly affects their ability to output quality stuff. I 
> love FOSS, but I’d rather have a healthy LC Ltd around with the resources to 
> keep building amazing goodies.

As the meme goes: This!
This is bottom line stuff: the health of the company is paramount. If that 
fails we all lose.

k
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-06 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
Upgrading this could be a very useful project. There is a lot of content in 
there but it has the issues you list.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 06/09/2021, 14:11, "use-livecode on behalf of Alex Tweedly via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

In the main thread, I mentioned that I found revOnline (aka "Sample 
Stacks"), but didn't say how or why. Here the answer to that ...

It has:

- no differentiation between 'libraries' and 'examples'

- it has no support for script-only stacks, which is surely the way most 
libraries will be done nowadays.

- a left hand scrolling box with ~90 'categories', in no particular 
order, no grouping

- grid vs list view - list shows you a list, which is basically the same 
as a 1-wide grid rather than 2-wide, plus a larger view of some random 
other item (OK, it's not random - it simply doesn't update when it should)

- updates when you click on the picture - but gives no cursor hint that 
you can do that

- a drop-down list for sort order - which isn't sized adequately when 
you first open revonline

- a 'search' box which must search something, but I don't know what. 
There is a sample stack called "Compare stack scripts", and which is 
tagged as "compare" - but isn't found if you search for "compare".

- and I usually find things via "browser + google" (or similar) and the 
stuff in samples stacks isn't visible that way.

H - maybe I've just found my next project :-)

Alex.


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing"
> twice so
> > > it will last 30 days.
> > >
> > > This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it
> without
> > > rushing.
> > >
> > > The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> > > customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps
> those
> > > who want to give it a good try.
> > >
> > > You can also put a nag screen at the start of any executable with an 
OK
> > > button link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> > > brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
> > >
> > > But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running
> on a
> > > 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7 processor and it STILL runs like
> > > treacle.
> > >
> > > If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
> less
> > > than 30 minutes.
> > >
> > > You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
> to
> > > schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
> > >
> > > It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost -
> and
> > > some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> > > student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
> idea
> > > of the lot so far)
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> > > stupid and not workable suggestions?.
> > >
> > > Lagi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
> give a
> > > > longer trial a shot at some point.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > > >
> > > > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > > > use-livecode"  > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
    > > > >
> > > > True, true.
> > > >
> > > > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > > > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any 
other
> > > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> > > would
> > > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> option.
> > > >
> > > > Ralph DiMola
> > > > IT Director
> > > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > > > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > > > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > > > download that.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > > >
> > > > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> > > > via use-livecode"  of
> > > > use-livecode@lists.

Sample stacks / revOnline [was: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition]

2021-09-06 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
In the main thread, I mentioned that I found revOnline (aka "Sample 
Stacks"), but didn't say how or why. Here the answer to that ...


It has:

- no differentiation between 'libraries' and 'examples'

- it has no support for script-only stacks, which is surely the way most 
libraries will be done nowadays.


- a left hand scrolling box with ~90 'categories', in no particular 
order, no grouping


- grid vs list view - list shows you a list, which is basically the same 
as a 1-wide grid rather than 2-wide, plus a larger view of some random 
other item (OK, it's not random - it simply doesn't update when it should)


- updates when you click on the picture - but gives no cursor hint that 
you can do that


- a drop-down list for sort order - which isn't sized adequately when 
you first open revonline


- a 'search' box which must search something, but I don't know what. 
There is a sample stack called "Compare stack scripts", and which is 
tagged as "compare" - but isn't found if you search for "compare".


- and I usually find things via "browser + google" (or similar) and the 
stuff in samples stacks isn't visible that way.


H - maybe I've just found my next project :-)

Alex.


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode

+1    Yes, speculation is fun, but probably not very useful :-)

On 06/09/2021 12:20, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote:

Let’s take a step back for a second and realise as a community we lack many 
things that other programming language communities have. We do have a very 
healthy mailing list, forum, and occasional conference. We’re all friends, and 
many of us have known each other for decades. Those are things that many, if 
not most, programming language communities do not have. And yet we have not 
fostered many of the ancillary things that most communities do.

* We have very few open source projects in the community, and the ones we have 
have very few contributors.
And I don't think they're well known, or advertised as willing (eager) 
to have new contributors.

* We have not build anything like a package manager to help us share code 
around. The IDE built-in extension store, and code sharing features are 
extremely simple.


Yes, we need a package manager and helpful conventions (where are 
libraries found to download, where do they reside on your system, how do 
they 'require' other libraries, etc. )


Re "The IDE built-in ...": Do you mean "sample stacks" ?
Or is there another extensions store and code sharing feature I've missed?

If it is "sample stacks" then I would 100% disagree about it being easy 
to use. But I'll put those comments in a separate email so it doesn't 
obscure the point here.



* We don’t have an ecosystem of tools and libraries around. We have some tools 
and some libraries.
* We don’t have many people writing blogs, making videos, writing books, and 
fostering the community.
* There are very few services and companies besides LiveCode Ltd offering 
products to the community.






The question is, who here wants to build stuff?


I think that having a package manager, and some infrastructure would be 
a huge step towards encouraging many people to build stuff. I do believe 
that the effort that went into LC Ltd supporting widgets (store, naming 
convention, add to toolbar, integrate to docs, ...) could, even should, 
be applied to script-only libraries and stacks. Or - we find some way to 
do that as part under Livecode.org


I know I have a few libraries that I could make public - but I'd be much 
happier, and more likely to finish up doing it - if there were some 
guidelines or support for how libraries should be placed, documented, etc.


revdocs - is that still around somewhere ?

Or is there a better alternative ?

Thanks,

Alex.


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
+1



> Am 06.09.2021 um 13:20 schrieb Andre Garzia via use-livecode 
> :
> 
> Don’t know how many people here remember that they tried that approach with 
> Dreamcard. I really like it, but in the end it didn’t work for the company. I 
> see many members here in the list saying “what should be done”, “what would 
> have worked”, and I wanted to remember every one that while speculation is 
> fun and a healthy practice, it is not necessarily a representation of truth. 
> We don’t know what could have worked, very few people here know the day to 
> day managing of LiveCode Ltd to judge what are their best options. What 
> people here can do is lobby from the user’s point of view, and yet I see a 
> ton of people “playing CEO with these emails”, that is not productive IMHO.
> 
> Let’s take a step back for a second and realise as a community we lack many 
> things that other programming language communities have. We do have a very 
> healthy mailing list, forum, and occasional conference. We’re all friends, 
> and many of us have known each other for decades. Those are things that many, 
> if not most, programming language communities do not have. And yet we have 
> not fostered many of the ancillary things that most communities do. 
> 
> * We have very few open source projects in the community, and the ones we 
> have have very few contributors.
> * We have not build anything like a package manager to help us share code 
> around. The IDE built-in extension store, and code sharing features are 
> extremely simple.
> * We don’t have an ecosystem of tools and libraries around. We have some 
> tools and some libraries.
> * We don’t have many people writing blogs, making videos, writing books, and 
> fostering the community. 
> * There are very few services and companies besides LiveCode Ltd offering 
> products to the community.
> 
> 
> All items mentioned above are important regardless if LiveCode Community 
> Edition is around or not. Without those things, it is very hard for any FOSS 
> initiative to blossom. Without those things, it is very hard to make a 
> programming language community feel vibrant and alive. We had eight years of 
> LC Community Edition, and as a community we haven’t really cared to nurture 
> it. Very few people contributed patches. We all loved having it, we were just 
> not putting enough care into it. And that is how FOSS dies.
> 
> What is most important is that the Community Edition was not the on-ramp path 
> to attract new users and then lead them towards a commercial license. What 
> happened was the opposite, Community users stayed with the Community Edition 
> and many paying users migrated to the FOSS offer. If the business model of LC 
> was different, if they had structured it all differently, maybe it could have 
> worked, but that is just speculation, we don’t know it might have failed in 
> such manner that LC Ltd would be dead.
> 
> What I do know, and I know quite a lot about programming language 
> communities, is that without more than just a mailing list and forum, you 
> can’t have a vibrant community. Without a community that feels engaging and 
> alive, you don’t get new users.
> 
> I’m happy paying for my license because I can see the value LC provides me, 
> and how my money directly affects their ability to output quality stuff. I 
> love FOSS, but I’d rather have a healthy LC Ltd around with the resources to 
> keep building amazing goodies. We as a community can build all the cool stuff 
> around the proprietary language, there is a ton of things we could have that 
> would make this a more lively place. 
> 
> The question is, who here wants to build stuff? 
> 
> A
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-06 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
Don’t know how many people here remember that they tried that approach with 
Dreamcard. I really like it, but in the end it didn’t work for the company. I 
see many members here in the list saying “what should be done”, “what would 
have worked”, and I wanted to remember every one that while speculation is fun 
and a healthy practice, it is not necessarily a representation of truth. We 
don’t know what could have worked, very few people here know the day to day 
managing of LiveCode Ltd to judge what are their best options. What people here 
can do is lobby from the user’s point of view, and yet I see a ton of people 
“playing CEO with these emails”, that is not productive IMHO.

Let’s take a step back for a second and realise as a community we lack many 
things that other programming language communities have. We do have a very 
healthy mailing list, forum, and occasional conference. We’re all friends, and 
many of us have known each other for decades. Those are things that many, if 
not most, programming language communities do not have. And yet we have not 
fostered many of the ancillary things that most communities do. 

* We have very few open source projects in the community, and the ones we have 
have very few contributors.
* We have not build anything like a package manager to help us share code 
around. The IDE built-in extension store, and code sharing features are 
extremely simple.
* We don’t have an ecosystem of tools and libraries around. We have some tools 
and some libraries.
* We don’t have many people writing blogs, making videos, writing books, and 
fostering the community. 
* There are very few services and companies besides LiveCode Ltd offering 
products to the community.


All items mentioned above are important regardless if LiveCode Community 
Edition is around or not. Without those things, it is very hard for any FOSS 
initiative to blossom. Without those things, it is very hard to make a 
programming language community feel vibrant and alive. We had eight years of LC 
Community Edition, and as a community we haven’t really cared to nurture it. 
Very few people contributed patches. We all loved having it, we were just not 
putting enough care into it. And that is how FOSS dies.

What is most important is that the Community Edition was not the on-ramp path 
to attract new users and then lead them towards a commercial license. What 
happened was the opposite, Community users stayed with the Community Edition 
and many paying users migrated to the FOSS offer. If the business model of LC 
was different, if they had structured it all differently, maybe it could have 
worked, but that is just speculation, we don’t know it might have failed in 
such manner that LC Ltd would be dead.

What I do know, and I know quite a lot about programming language communities, 
is that without more than just a mailing list and forum, you can’t have a 
vibrant community. Without a community that feels engaging and alive, you don’t 
get new users.

I’m happy paying for my license because I can see the value LC provides me, and 
how my money directly affects their ability to output quality stuff. I love 
FOSS, but I’d rather have a healthy LC Ltd around with the resources to keep 
building amazing goodies. We as a community can build all the cool stuff around 
the proprietary language, there is a ton of things we could have that would 
make this a more lively place. 

The question is, who here wants to build stuff? 

A
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
Let’s get this conundrum worked out:

1. If I have Mac or Windows machine
2. If I download “Livecode 9.6.4 Standard ”
3. And I pay $300.00 for an annual license
4. I can build for Desktop for Windows, Linux, iOS iPhone, Android
5. Minus Premium features
6. For one year + plus the upgrades that occur in that year.
7
Now,

1. I have a Mac or Windows machine
2. If I buy $9.90 per month
3. If I can *still* download “Livecode 9.6.4 Standard ”
4. I can build for Desktop for Windows, Linux, iOS iPhone, Android
5. But, I will forgo any upgrades that occur in that year.
6. If I built, in one month time, a standalone the works iOS iPhone and 
Android. It will be good for Apple and Google
7. But I stop subscription that means, the standalone stops working

What is complicated about that? OR can we clarify?

The HTML “thingy” is not addressed.

So I have a “permanent, Business License, all features included,” but I want to 
buy a license for co-workers that live, for example, in California. $300.00 is 
cheap.


Svasti Astu – Be Well
Brahmanathaswami

Get SivaSiva.app – It free!
https://www.himalayanacademy.com/view/sivasiva



On 9/5/21, 2:32 AM, "use-livecode"  
wrote:
Hi Folks,

This seems headed for trouble again if we're not careful.

We must avoid repeating the same history:

1. Added work for LC Ltd without compensation*
2. Buggy struggling main product due to #1
3. Overcomplicating things
4. Burdening those who pay with the extra expense
5. *Added work for ourselves without compensation;
(That was the previous "bright idea" remember?)

Cutting out the free Community version is a smart move.
$10/mo hobby is pretty darn cheap. Everyone can afford that.

(Some end-clients want OSS, but only half of those know why.
The other half are only repeating something they heard.)

A demo is beneficial, and calendar-time-limited demos suck.
Thus, unlimited-calendar-time demo could be the way to go.
10-line scripts suck too. Non-standalone might be the way.

But as Alex said:

> You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone
> to install and run the stacks you create.

Yep. Even easier than your example; no plugin necessary.
A shortcut to your stack, and it launches the IDE.
Not that much different from a full desktop app.
I could make it near enough to please most users.
Then we're still encouraging nonpayment for LC.
So we need an additional limitation.

But now we're
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
I must admit, that i totally agree with you.



> Am 05.09.2021 um 17:35 schrieb Bernard Devlin via use-livecode 
> :
> 
> .
> 
> Largest user demographic? Free-loaders who contributed no money but plenty
> of baseless whining?
> 
> So many protest poverty but I'm 100% certain they spend more every year
> than the cost of an annual license fee on plenty of other things. Some of
> us paid for a license for years in order to fund something we believed in
> and wanted to see thrive, even though that meant having to forego stuff
> that the free-loaders would instead be spending their money on. FWIW my
> health problems have made it difficult for me to do any work that required
> keeping regular hours or even being able to keep appointments. Yet I'd
> bought licenses for 18 years before I bought a lifetime license (I still
> have unused licenses in my account, at one point in the last few years I
> had three concurrent licenses).  When I hear "can't afford" I translate it
> into "I prioritise my spending differently".  "If I don't make any
> financial contribution to LC Ltd I can get a new iPhone" - that kind of
> thing.  I just sacrificed other things in order to keep supporting LC.
> 
> When they had their free toys taken away the rampant hostility from the
> free-loaders shows what little value they brought.  Some of those whining
> free-loaders have barely made 80 posts on the Forum in the past 8 years.
> Despite being a continuous license payer, despite my health problems, I
> freely gave hundreds of hours of help to people on the Forum. Some of them
> are saying "if LC Ltd had had a donate button, I'd have sent them some
> money". Yeah, right - contacting LC Ltd and asking how they could
> contribute financially was beyond their abilities.
> 
> In 25 years on the internet, I've never before seen such a collection of
> valueless people as these whiners (they wouldn't be tolerated in any other
> business or open source community).  Most of the users of the Community
> edition are of so little value that they can't even be bothered to take
> part in the Forum and provide support to other users! When I look at the
> whiners compared to how few posts they even made on the Forum, I'm filled
> with disgust.  Have they no shame? They contribute neither time nor money.
> 
> It's simple. Those who aren't parasites will decide to start contributing
> financially. Those who are parasites will go away, and live off some other
> community - and the absence of parasites will be beneficial. If just one of
> those who isn't a parasite takes out a standard license it will take him
> nearly 20 years to contribute as much financially as I have _since_ the
> "community" edition was launched. People like me could have simply stopped
> paying and used "the free edition" too, and this situation would have come
> about much sooner. If it turns out all of those who used the Community
> edition were parasites, what has LC Ltd lost if they vanish?
> 
> Parasite might sound like a strong word, but what word do you use for
> someone who takes, takes, takes but never gives back, contributing nothing
> else than to make an organism weaker?
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Over on the Forum I've seen several of the whiners criticising the lifetime
licenses - people who have paid a tiny fraction of what we've paid (if
they've paid anything at all)!  I suspect their baseless criticisms have
cost more than any of the whiners have paid in license fees. If I ran the
Forum the baseless whiners would be told to "stop whining or leave". I know
of dozens of people banned from social media for things far less offensive
than are said about LC Ltd on their own forum.

I rarely delete emails and just went back through mine. I'd been a license
payer for more than a decade before I got a lifetime offer. But I couldn't
afford it until I got the offer again, some 5 years later.  Even then the
lifetime license cost me more than I'd paid in the previous 18 years
combined, so I had to think hard about it (not sure if I will be around in
18 years). And though there were some years of future license banked in my
LC account, I didn't quibble and say "can I have a discount for the years
I've already paid in advance".  I think if I had done that LC Ltd would
have taken that into account, because that's how they roll.  But to me it
felt mean-spirited to ask for a discount. Which is why I think LC Ltd have
been very magnanimous to those who say they can't afford a license. My
self-respect wouldn't let me be one of those people.

I have no expectation of LC Ltd listening to Dan's suggestion, as the one
thing that stands out from watching Kevin for 20 years is that he does his
utmost to be honourable. If the majority of those free-loaders had any
honour, we wouldn't be having any of this discussion.

I hoped that the open source initiative would have seen positive
contributions, but that didn't happen.  I'll come back in a year and see if
they've even managed to compile the existing code.

Regards, Bernard


On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 5:16 PM Rick Harrison via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> So you want the company to break more promises, even to the lifetimers?
>
> A lot of the lifetimers have spent a lot of money on licenses before
> deciding to invest in lifetime licenses.  I don’t think you want to be
> ticking off what is probably the company's most loyal base.
> It’s a recipe for disaster!
>
> Just my 2 cents for the day.
>
> Rick
>
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Rick Harrison via use-livecode
Hi Dan,

So you want the company to break more promises, even to the lifetimers?

A lot of the lifetimers have spent a lot of money on licenses before
deciding to invest in lifetime licenses.  I don’t think you want to be
ticking off what is probably the company's most loyal base.  
It’s a recipe for disaster!

Just my 2 cents for the day.

Rick

> On Sep 5, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Dan Brown via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> If revenue is the root of livecodes
> problems then I don't  see why a small demographic of lifetimers is exempt
> from an update in policy that seeks to increase the paying subscription
> count

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On the flip side, if there's only a small demographic then the loss of that 
revenue would be minimal and the company would retain its honorable reputation.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On September 5, 2021 8:57:33 AM Dan Brown via use-livecode 
 wrote:.

 I don't  see why a small demographic of lifetimers is exempt
from an update in policy that seeks to increase the paying subscription
count





___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
I'm sure Kevin etc. doesn't share my view on this. But here it is. Get your
popcorn.

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 2:56 PM Dan Brown via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> It can't  be any more harmful than abruptly pulling the rug from under the
> feet of your largest user demographic. If revenue is the root of livecodes
> problems then I don't  see why a small demographic of lifetimers is exempt
> from an update in policy that seeks to increase the paying subscription
> count


Largest user demographic? Free-loaders who contributed no money but plenty
of baseless whining?

So many protest poverty but I'm 100% certain they spend more every year
than the cost of an annual license fee on plenty of other things. Some of
us paid for a license for years in order to fund something we believed in
and wanted to see thrive, even though that meant having to forego stuff
that the free-loaders would instead be spending their money on. FWIW my
health problems have made it difficult for me to do any work that required
keeping regular hours or even being able to keep appointments. Yet I'd
bought licenses for 18 years before I bought a lifetime license (I still
have unused licenses in my account, at one point in the last few years I
had three concurrent licenses).  When I hear "can't afford" I translate it
into "I prioritise my spending differently".  "If I don't make any
financial contribution to LC Ltd I can get a new iPhone" - that kind of
thing.  I just sacrificed other things in order to keep supporting LC.

When they had their free toys taken away the rampant hostility from the
free-loaders shows what little value they brought.  Some of those whining
free-loaders have barely made 80 posts on the Forum in the past 8 years.
Despite being a continuous license payer, despite my health problems, I
freely gave hundreds of hours of help to people on the Forum. Some of them
are saying "if LC Ltd had had a donate button, I'd have sent them some
money". Yeah, right - contacting LC Ltd and asking how they could
contribute financially was beyond their abilities.

In 25 years on the internet, I've never before seen such a collection of
valueless people as these whiners (they wouldn't be tolerated in any other
business or open source community).  Most of the users of the Community
edition are of so little value that they can't even be bothered to take
part in the Forum and provide support to other users! When I look at the
whiners compared to how few posts they even made on the Forum, I'm filled
with disgust.  Have they no shame? They contribute neither time nor money.

It's simple. Those who aren't parasites will decide to start contributing
financially. Those who are parasites will go away, and live off some other
community - and the absence of parasites will be beneficial. If just one of
those who isn't a parasite takes out a standard license it will take him
nearly 20 years to contribute as much financially as I have _since_ the
"community" edition was launched. People like me could have simply stopped
paying and used "the free edition" too, and this situation would have come
about much sooner. If it turns out all of those who used the Community
edition were parasites, what has LC Ltd lost if they vanish?

Parasite might sound like a strong word, but what word do you use for
someone who takes, takes, takes but never gives back, contributing nothing
else than to make an organism weaker?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
 > I'd also get rid of any existing lifetime
 > and lock in licenses (sorry, time to clean house)

That would clean house all right! Hand grenade style.
We'd be getting to the point of serious self-harm.

It can't  be any more harmful than abruptly pulling the rug from under the
feet of your largest user demographic. If revenue is the root of livecodes
problems then I don't  see why a small demographic of lifetimers is exempt
from an update in policy that seeks to increase the paying subscription
count

On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 15:32 Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This seems headed for trouble again if we're not careful.
>
> We must avoid repeating the same history:
>
> 1. Added work for LC Ltd without compensation*
> 2. Buggy struggling main product due to #1
> 3. Overcomplicating things
> 4. Burdening those who pay with the extra expense
> 5. *Added work for ourselves without compensation;
> (That was the previous "bright idea" remember?)
>
> Cutting out the free Community version is a smart move.
> $10/mo hobby is pretty darn cheap. Everyone can afford that.
>
> (Some end-clients want OSS, but only half of those know why.
> The other half are only repeating something they heard.)
>
> A demo is beneficial, and calendar-time-limited demos suck.
> Thus, unlimited-calendar-time demo could be the way to go.
> 10-line scripts suck too. Non-standalone might be the way.
>
> But as Alex said:
>
>  > You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone
>  > to install and run the stacks you create.
>
> Yep. Even easier than your example; no plugin necessary.
> A shortcut to your stack, and it launches the IDE.
> Not that much different from a full desktop app.
> I could make it near enough to please most users.
> Then we're still encouraging nonpayment for LC.
> So we need an additional limitation.
>
> But now we're getting into bad ideas...
>
> Terry:
>
>  > what if only licensed versions of LC could produce
>  > and run distributable/shareable stacks while the free version
>  > could only run stacks produced by that particular instance of the app?
>
> That's getting nowhere. Two separate communities to support
> (plus the sucky problem of Community-can't-run-this-stack)
> so extra work for free, and it's begging to be gamed.
>
> I can probably still make a great "app" experience.
> This repeats all or most of the old problems,
> and even discourages using the $10 version.
>
> Worse still...
>
> Dan:
>
>  > Introduce breaking changes when it's necessary
>  > to move the language forward
>
> We tried "cut off the old hair" memes already, remember?
> That was part of the open source breathless refactoring excitement.
> Result: twice the bugs with a quarter of the performance for years.
> Plus tons of added work for us and our clients to update stacks.
>
> Some people went out of business, others used tons of time or money.
> Many of these misguided repeating memes simply need to die!
> Better to kill a meme than to see more people get hurt.
>
> LC is not an OS. Breaking changes have been a major pain in the rear.
> Almost as bad as the extra bugs and performance problems.
>
> To have a future, we need a firm stable foundation to build upon.
> Not encouraging an ever-shifting mire. Recompiles, yes. Rewrites, no.
> If maintaining is not easier in LC, people will go use other tools.
> We've seen that already. We need to learn from experience.
>
> Likewise...
>
>  > I'd also get rid of any existing lifetime
>  > and lock in licenses (sorry, time to clean house)
>
> That would clean house all right! Hand grenade style.
> We'd be getting to the point of serious self-harm.
>
> This one is not so bad, though:
>
>  > Nag screen with 5-10 second timeout in IDE and standalones
>
> Nix the standalones; free should be noncompiling, at least for desktop.
> But nags can be useful. And a possible mobile solution,
> but it would have to be combined with one more limitation.
>
> Today's users are quite willing to tolerate some nags.
> If LC Free competes against its own $10 version, nobody wins.
> We're back to a buggy underfunded main product.
>
> I've been too sick (good old Delta) to follow the whole thread,
> just read the last few messages, and will probably not be able
> to follow the rest of the discussion for a while either.
> This post is all I can muster.
>
> But let's learn from the old mistakes, eh?
> Many things which sound great ... aren't.
> Repeating them makes things ... worse.
> Let's not nuke ourselves again in the process. :)
>
> Happy coding, and hopefully I'll be back in action after a few days.
> Hoping this doesn't head right off the cliff while I'm down sick!
> Wish I could give this the full attention it deserves
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Curry Kenworthy
>
> Custom Software Development
> "Better Methods, Better Results"
> LiveCode Training and Consulting
> http://livecodeconsulting.com/
>
> ___
> use-livecode 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
Worse still...

Dan:

 > Introduce breaking changes when it's necessary
 > to move the language forward

We tried "cut off the old hair" memes already, remember?

I would argue that retaining legacy functionality and behaviours whilst
trying to modernise or improve a language introduces bugs and is a drain on
resources. Hence why nearly every successful language has had to bite the
bullet at points and break compatibility in order to move forward. That
didn't happen during the refactor (it probably should have). Maintaining a
stable code base whilst still supporting 10 year old stacks hasn't worked





On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 15:32 Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This seems headed for trouble again if we're not careful.
>
> We must avoid repeating the same history:
>
> 1. Added work for LC Ltd without compensation*
> 2. Buggy struggling main product due to #1
> 3. Overcomplicating things
> 4. Burdening those who pay with the extra expense
> 5. *Added work for ourselves without compensation;
> (That was the previous "bright idea" remember?)
>
> Cutting out the free Community version is a smart move.
> $10/mo hobby is pretty darn cheap. Everyone can afford that.
>
> (Some end-clients want OSS, but only half of those know why.
> The other half are only repeating something they heard.)
>
> A demo is beneficial, and calendar-time-limited demos suck.
> Thus, unlimited-calendar-time demo could be the way to go.
> 10-line scripts suck too. Non-standalone might be the way.
>
> But as Alex said:
>
>  > You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone
>  > to install and run the stacks you create.
>
> Yep. Even easier than your example; no plugin necessary.
> A shortcut to your stack, and it launches the IDE.
> Not that much different from a full desktop app.
> I could make it near enough to please most users.
> Then we're still encouraging nonpayment for LC.
> So we need an additional limitation.
>
> But now we're getting into bad ideas...
>
> Terry:
>
>  > what if only licensed versions of LC could produce
>  > and run distributable/shareable stacks while the free version
>  > could only run stacks produced by that particular instance of the app?
>
> That's getting nowhere. Two separate communities to support
> (plus the sucky problem of Community-can't-run-this-stack)
> so extra work for free, and it's begging to be gamed.
>
> I can probably still make a great "app" experience.
> This repeats all or most of the old problems,
> and even discourages using the $10 version.
>
> Worse still...
>
> Dan:
>
>  > Introduce breaking changes when it's necessary
>  > to move the language forward
>
> We tried "cut off the old hair" memes already, remember?
> That was part of the open source breathless refactoring excitement.
> Result: twice the bugs with a quarter of the performance for years.
> Plus tons of added work for us and our clients to update stacks.
>
> Some people went out of business, others used tons of time or money.
> Many of these misguided repeating memes simply need to die!
> Better to kill a meme than to see more people get hurt.
>
> LC is not an OS. Breaking changes have been a major pain in the rear.
> Almost as bad as the extra bugs and performance problems.
>
> To have a future, we need a firm stable foundation to build upon.
> Not encouraging an ever-shifting mire. Recompiles, yes. Rewrites, no.
> If maintaining is not easier in LC, people will go use other tools.
> We've seen that already. We need to learn from experience.
>
> Likewise...
>
>  > I'd also get rid of any existing lifetime
>  > and lock in licenses (sorry, time to clean house)
>
> That would clean house all right! Hand grenade style.
> We'd be getting to the point of serious self-harm.
>
> This one is not so bad, though:
>
>  > Nag screen with 5-10 second timeout in IDE and standalones
>
> Nix the standalones; free should be noncompiling, at least for desktop.
> But nags can be useful. And a possible mobile solution,
> but it would have to be combined with one more limitation.
>
> Today's users are quite willing to tolerate some nags.
> If LC Free competes against its own $10 version, nobody wins.
> We're back to a buggy underfunded main product.
>
> I've been too sick (good old Delta) to follow the whole thread,
> just read the last few messages, and will probably not be able
> to follow the rest of the discussion for a while either.
> This post is all I can muster.
>
> But let's learn from the old mistakes, eh?
> Many things which sound great ... aren't.
> Repeating them makes things ... worse.
> Let's not nuke ourselves again in the process. :)
>
> Happy coding, and hopefully I'll be back in action after a few days.
> Hoping this doesn't head right off the cliff while I'm down sick!
> Wish I could give this the full attention it deserves
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Curry Kenworthy
>
> Custom Software Development
> "Better Methods, Better Results"
> LiveCode Training and 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode



Hi Folks,

This seems headed for trouble again if we're not careful.

We must avoid repeating the same history:

1. Added work for LC Ltd without compensation*
2. Buggy struggling main product due to #1
3. Overcomplicating things
4. Burdening those who pay with the extra expense
5. *Added work for ourselves without compensation;
(That was the previous "bright idea" remember?)

Cutting out the free Community version is a smart move.
$10/mo hobby is pretty darn cheap. Everyone can afford that.

(Some end-clients want OSS, but only half of those know why.
The other half are only repeating something they heard.)

A demo is beneficial, and calendar-time-limited demos suck.
Thus, unlimited-calendar-time demo could be the way to go.
10-line scripts suck too. Non-standalone might be the way.

But as Alex said:

> You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone
> to install and run the stacks you create.

Yep. Even easier than your example; no plugin necessary.
A shortcut to your stack, and it launches the IDE.
Not that much different from a full desktop app.
I could make it near enough to please most users.
Then we're still encouraging nonpayment for LC.
So we need an additional limitation.

But now we're getting into bad ideas...

Terry:

> what if only licensed versions of LC could produce
> and run distributable/shareable stacks while the free version
> could only run stacks produced by that particular instance of the app?

That's getting nowhere. Two separate communities to support
(plus the sucky problem of Community-can't-run-this-stack)
so extra work for free, and it's begging to be gamed.

I can probably still make a great "app" experience.
This repeats all or most of the old problems,
and even discourages using the $10 version.

Worse still...

Dan:

> Introduce breaking changes when it's necessary
> to move the language forward

We tried "cut off the old hair" memes already, remember?
That was part of the open source breathless refactoring excitement.
Result: twice the bugs with a quarter of the performance for years.
Plus tons of added work for us and our clients to update stacks.

Some people went out of business, others used tons of time or money.
Many of these misguided repeating memes simply need to die!
Better to kill a meme than to see more people get hurt.

LC is not an OS. Breaking changes have been a major pain in the rear.
Almost as bad as the extra bugs and performance problems.

To have a future, we need a firm stable foundation to build upon.
Not encouraging an ever-shifting mire. Recompiles, yes. Rewrites, no.
If maintaining is not easier in LC, people will go use other tools.
We've seen that already. We need to learn from experience.

Likewise...

> I'd also get rid of any existing lifetime
> and lock in licenses (sorry, time to clean house)

That would clean house all right! Hand grenade style.
We'd be getting to the point of serious self-harm.

This one is not so bad, though:

> Nag screen with 5-10 second timeout in IDE and standalones

Nix the standalones; free should be noncompiling, at least for desktop.
But nags can be useful. And a possible mobile solution,
but it would have to be combined with one more limitation.

Today's users are quite willing to tolerate some nags.
If LC Free competes against its own $10 version, nobody wins.
We're back to a buggy underfunded main product.

I've been too sick (good old Delta) to follow the whole thread,
just read the last few messages, and will probably not be able
to follow the rest of the discussion for a while either.
This post is all I can muster.

But let's learn from the old mistakes, eh?
Many things which sound great ... aren't.
Repeating them makes things ... worse.
Let's not nuke ourselves again in the process. :)

Happy coding, and hopefully I'll be back in action after a few days.
Hoping this doesn't head right off the cliff while I'm down sick!
Wish I could give this the full attention it deserves

Best wishes,

Curry Kenworthy

Custom Software Development
"Better Methods, Better Results"
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Richmond via use-livecode

Dreamweaver, RevMedia . . . absolutely no need to do any thinking
whatsoever . . . it has all happened before.

On 5.09.21 10:42, Terry Judd via use-livecode wrote:

Not sure how this would work - but what if only licensed versions of LC could 
produce and run distributable/shareable stacks while the free version could 
only run stacks produced by that particular instance of the app?

On 5/9/21, 3:57 pm, "use-livecode on behalf of J. Landman Gay via use-livecode" 
 wrote:

 You wouldn't necessarily even need that much. Tell them to install the free
 version and open your stack from the File menu. It isn't an app but they'd
 have all the capabilities.
 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 On September 4, 2021 7:53:43 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
  wrote:



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
There will always be a subset of people that will circumvent paying for
software. I'm not convinced an endless battle trying to prevent misuse is
worth the cost of hampering the onboarding experience for new customers.
Unless you've cornered the market you really can't afford to be user
hostile.

Personally would keep it simple and have 3 licenses with no platform
restrictions

- Evaluation license (free)
Nag screen with 5-10 second timeout in IDE and standalones (show periodic
nag screens if the gui is hidden etc)

- Discounted license ( $80 ish, 1 full version cycle)
For non commercial use

- Commercial license (1 full version cycle)
For commercial use


I'd also get rid of any existing lifetime and lock in licenses (sorry, time
to clean house)

And I wouldn't advertise or offer any special behind the scenes deals with
support (sorry, that will just antagonise the paying user base)

Introduce breaking changes when it's necessary to move the language forward

On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 08:57 J. Landman Gay via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> You wouldn't necessarily even need that much. Tell them to install the
> free
> version and open your stack from the File menu. It isn't an app but they'd
> have all the capabilities.
> --
> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> On September 4, 2021 7:53:43 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
>  wrote:
>
> > On 04/09/2021 15:36, David Bovill via use-livecode wrote:
> >> So the question here is why not do the same here - keep a
> free-to-develop
> >> “trial version” without the compilation framework and tools. I’m
> curious to
> >> the reasoning. The cynic in me would say that the assumption is that
> there
> >> are too few developers in this (non-game) market who would need the
> >> compilation / stand-alone-builder functions - so while game developers
> and
> >> companies might pay for commercial Unity 3D licenses - that is not true
> for
> >> Livecode developers? I don’t / like / buy that argument - so I would
> love
> >> to here good reasons or not adopting a Unity 3D style licensing model?
> >
> > I'm not familiar with Unity - so I'll answer just from a LC perspective
> > (and in many ways just reinforce what Kevin said in his response to your
> > original suggestion).
> >
> > The problem with a free, no-app-builder version is that you can do so
> > much with it.
> >
> > You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone to install and run the
> > stacks you create.
> >
> > 0. Either create your stack as a plugin, or create a plugin which gives
> > a menu of apps to run.
> >
> > Then instruct your users to:
> >
> > 1. Install LC (free-to-develop). LC's installation process is almost
> > hands-free.
> >
> > 2. download/run a simple installer script or shell script which will put
> > a stack into the (default location for) the plugins folder.
> >
> > 3. Run the IDE.
> >
> > 4. Follow the 3-click instructions to change the setting to start this
> > plugin when LC starts up.
> >
> > and you're done. It's not 100% as simple to install as a built app, but
> > it's not rocket science.
> >
> > And provided your stacks don't involve the menu system, users will
> > probably not even notice that they're in the IDE. Design your app to
> > look like it was "mobile-first" with its own menu built-in and 95% of
> > your users would be happy.
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-05 Thread Terry Judd via use-livecode
Not sure how this would work - but what if only licensed versions of LC could 
produce and run distributable/shareable stacks while the free version could 
only run stacks produced by that particular instance of the app?

On 5/9/21, 3:57 pm, "use-livecode on behalf of J. Landman Gay via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

You wouldn't necessarily even need that much. Tell them to install the free 
version and open your stack from the File menu. It isn't an app but they'd 
have all the capabilities.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On September 4, 2021 7:53:43 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
 wrote:



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-04 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
You wouldn't necessarily even need that much. Tell them to install the free 
version and open your stack from the File menu. It isn't an app but they'd 
have all the capabilities.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On September 4, 2021 7:53:43 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode 
 wrote:



On 04/09/2021 15:36, David Bovill via use-livecode wrote:
So the question here is why not do the same here - keep a free-to-develop 
“trial version” without the compilation framework and tools. I’m curious to 
the reasoning. The cynic in me would say that the assumption is that there 
are too few developers in this (non-game) market who would need the 
compilation / stand-alone-builder functions - so while game developers and 
companies might pay for commercial Unity 3D licenses - that is not true for 
Livecode developers? I don’t / like / buy that argument - so I would love 
to here good reasons or not adopting a Unity 3D style licensing model?


I'm not familiar with Unity - so I'll answer just from a LC perspective
(and in many ways just reinforce what Kevin said in his response to your
original suggestion).

The problem with a free, no-app-builder version is that you can do so
much with it.

You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone to install and run the
stacks you create.

0. Either create your stack as a plugin, or create a plugin which gives
a menu of apps to run.

Then instruct your users to:

1. Install LC (free-to-develop). LC's installation process is almost
hands-free.

2. download/run a simple installer script or shell script which will put
a stack into the (default location for) the plugins folder.

3. Run the IDE.

4. Follow the 3-click instructions to change the setting to start this
plugin when LC starts up.

and you're done. It's not 100% as simple to install as a built app, but
it's not rocket science.

And provided your stacks don't involve the menu system, users will
probably not even notice that they're in the IDE. Design your app to
look like it was "mobile-first" with its own menu built-in and 95% of
your users would be happy.

Alex.



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode





___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-04 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode


On 04/09/2021 15:36, David Bovill via use-livecode wrote:

So the question here is why not do the same here - keep a free-to-develop 
“trial version” without the compilation framework and tools. I’m curious to the 
reasoning. The cynic in me would say that the assumption is that there are too 
few developers in this (non-game) market who would need the compilation / 
stand-alone-builder functions - so while game developers and companies might 
pay for commercial Unity 3D licenses - that is not true for Livecode 
developers? I don’t / like / buy that argument - so I would love to here good 
reasons or not adopting a Unity 3D style licensing model?


I'm not familiar with Unity - so I'll answer just from a LC perspective 
(and in many ways just reinforce what Kevin said in his response to your 
original suggestion).


The problem with a free, no-app-builder version is that you can do so 
much with it.


You can make it easy (or even trivial) for anyone to install and run the 
stacks you create.


0. Either create your stack as a plugin, or create a plugin which gives 
a menu of apps to run.


Then instruct your users to:

1. Install LC (free-to-develop). LC's installation process is almost 
hands-free.


2. download/run a simple installer script or shell script which will put 
a stack into the (default location for) the plugins folder.


3. Run the IDE.

4. Follow the 3-click instructions to change the setting to start this 
plugin when LC starts up.


and you're done. It's not 100% as simple to install as a built app, but 
it's not rocket science.


And provided your stacks don't involve the menu system, users will 
probably not even notice that they're in the IDE. Design your app to 
look like it was "mobile-first" with its own menu built-in and 95% of 
your users would be happy.


Alex.



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-04 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
 a
> > > student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
> idea
> > > of the lot so far)
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> > > stupid and not workable suggestions?.
> > >
> > > Lagi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
> give a
> > > > longer trial a shot at some point.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > > >
> > > > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > > > use-livecode"  > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > True, true.
> > > >
> > > > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > > > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> > > would
> > > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> option.
> > > >
> > > > Ralph DiMola
> > > > IT Director
> > > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > > > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > > > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > > > download that.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > > >
> > > > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> > > > via use-livecode"  of
> > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi there
> > > >
> > > > I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > > >
> > > > That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > > subscription preferences:
> > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > > subscription preferences:
> > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > > subscription preferences:
> > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > > subscription preferences:
> > > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > KIndest Regards Lagi
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tom Glod
> > Founder & Developer
> > MakeShyft R.D.A (www.makeshyft.com)
> > Mobile:647.562.9411
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
Tom Glod
Founder & Developer
MakeShyft R.D.A (www.makeshyft.com)
Mobile:647.562.9411
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-04 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
evelop Yourself
> > >
> > > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > > use-livecode"  > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > True, true.
> > >
> > > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> > would
> > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
> > >
> > > Ralph DiMola
> > > IT Director
> > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > >
> > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > > download that.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > >
> > > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> > > via use-livecode"  > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > >
> > > That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > KIndest Regards Lagi
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
>
> --
> Tom Glod
> Founder & Developer
> MakeShyft R.D.A (www.makeshyft.com)
> Mobile:647.562.9411
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-03 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
ld be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
> around
> > > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any
> other
>     > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter.
> I
> > would
> > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> option.
> > >
> > > Ralph DiMola
> > > IT Director
> > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: use-livecode [mailto:
> use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > >
> > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a
> free
> > > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > > download that.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > >
> > > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael
> Kristensen
> > > via use-livecode"  behalf of
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community
> Edition
> > >
> > > That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
> your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > KIndest Regards Lagi
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
>
> --
> Tom Glod
> Founder & Developer
> MakeShyft R.D.A (www.makeshyft.com)
> Mobile:647.562.9411
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
Tom Glod
Founder & Developer
MakeShyft R.D.A (www.makeshyft.com)
Mobile:647.562.9411
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-03 Thread Drs Mark Schonewille via use-livecode

In one word: DreamCard! :D

Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk
KvK 50277553
VAT NL002099948B21
https://ecxtalk.nl
https://www.nt2.nu

Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner
http://www3.economy-x-talk.com/file.php?node=programming-livecode-for-the-real-beginner

Op 2-9-2021 om 15:49 schreef Michael Kristensen via use-livecode:

Hi there

I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

Michael



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-03 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
What I liked about your email to me Tom was that it was extremely specific. You 
had just a handful of issues you considered absolutely key and offered to Zoom 
to show that to me. I look forward to scheduling that once I finish getting 
unburried __ 

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 22:59, "use-livecode on behalf of Tom Glod via use-livecode" 
 wrote:

Lagi,

I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
points needing to be addressed.

Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.

Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
platform?



On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
> way
> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
>
>  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
> and by the time they answer
> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
>
> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
> (whichever comes first).
>
> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
> it will last 30 days.
>
> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
> rushing.
>
> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
> who want to give it a good try.
>
> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
>
> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on 
a
> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
> treacle.
>
> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in 
less
> than 30 minutes.
>
> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>
> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid 
idea
> of the lot so far)
>
>
> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>
> Lagi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give 
a
> > longer trial a shot at some point.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >
> > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > use-livecode"  > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > True, true.
> >
> > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> would
> > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
> >
> > Ralph DiMola
> > IT Director
> > Evergreen Information Services
> >     rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > To: How to use LiveCode
> > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community E

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-03 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
There are some good suggestions here around the Lagi, thank you. We will 
certainly be exploring ways to make that experience just right in the coming 
days.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 22:33, "use-livecode on behalf of Lagi Pittas via use-livecode" 
 wrote:

Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the way
so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.

 You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
and by the time they answer
you get cheesed off and remove the  program.

The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
(whichever comes first).

This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
for 6 months but it times out anyway.
Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
it will last 30 days.

This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
rushing.

The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
who want to give it a good try.

You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).

But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on a
16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
treacle.

If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in less
than 30 minutes.

You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.

It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid idea
of the lot so far)


Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
stupid and not workable suggestions?.

Lagi







On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give a
> longer trial a shot at some point.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> True, true.
>
> There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I would
> not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
>
> Ralph DiMola
> IT Director
> Evergreen Information Services
> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> download that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> via use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubsc

IDE performance (Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition)

2021-09-03 Thread Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode
obile would be a non-starter. I

would

not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an

option.


 Ralph DiMola
 IT Director
 Evergreen Information Services
 rdim...@evergreeninfo.net


 -Original Message-
 From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com]

On

Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
 Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
 To: How to use LiveCode
     Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
 Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

 Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
download that.

 Kind regards,

 Kevin

 Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
 LiveCode: Develop Yourself

 On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael

Kristensen

via use-livecode"  wrote:

 Hi there

 I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community

Edition


 That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

 Michael

 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




--
KIndest Regards Lagi
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
vilian to install a
> > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> > would
> > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> option.
> > >
> > > Ralph DiMola
> > > IT Director
> > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> > >
> > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > > download that.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > >
> > > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael
> Kristensen
> > > via use-livecode"  > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community
> Edition
> > >
> > > That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > KIndest Regards Lagi
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
>>
But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on a
16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
treacle.
<<

As I don't recognize this experience can you put a video of your experience
on the cloud?  I don't run on hardware anything like as beefy as you have.
The only machine I've got where LC is slow is one where Windows itself is
really slow (a 4yo laptop).  On my two Apple machines (M1 and Intel, the
latter is 5yo) it is not "like treacle", neither is it slow on my i5
Windows machine.

It's a bit hard for LC Ltd to identify and fix something if it's only found
in some odd cases.

Regards, Bernard






On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
> way
> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
>
>  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
> and by the time they answer
> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
>
> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
> (whichever comes first).
>
> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
> it will last 30 days.
>
> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
> rushing.
>
> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
> who want to give it a good try.
>
> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
>
> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on a
> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
> treacle.
>
> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in less
> than 30 minutes.
>
> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>
> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid idea
> of the lot so far)
>
>
> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>
> Lagi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give a
> > longer trial a shot at some point.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >
> > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > use-livecode"  > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > True, true.
> >
> > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> would
> > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
> >
> > Ralph DiMola
> > IT Director
> > Evergreen Information Services
> > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > To: How to use LiveCode
> > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >
> > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > download that.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >
> > On 02/09/20

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Tom,

I have mentioned the IDE problem how many times in the last 3 years and
nothing has come of it.

They have been fixated on getting bought out by Apple or Claris (LCFM is on
the Filemaker store) but I bet Apple has been stringing them along and
learning their IP to bring out their own
to compete with flutter. because of Flutter.

I could be totally wrong but apple and microsoft have done it more than once

https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-regulation/stealing-health-apple-watch-328647
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FSm61dM_nM
https://www.sriplaw.com/can-apple-steal-my-iphone-app-ideas-and-get-away-with-it/

Lagi

On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 23:01, Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> I literally begged. LOL
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:59 PM Tom Glod  wrote:
>
> > Lagi,
> >
> > I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
> > points needing to be addressed.
> >
> > Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.
> >
> > Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
> > platform?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
> >> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
> >> way
> >> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
> >>
> >>  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
> >> and by the time they answer
> >> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
> >>
> >> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6
> months
> >> (whichever comes first).
> >>
> >> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without
> exiting
> >> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
> >> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice
> so
> >> it will last 30 days.
> >>
> >> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it
> without
> >> rushing.
> >>
> >> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> >> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
> >> who want to give it a good try.
> >>
> >> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an
> OK
> >> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> >> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
> >>
> >> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running
> on
> >> a
> >> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
> >> treacle.
> >>
> >> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
> >> less
> >> than 30 minutes.
> >>
> >> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
> to
> >> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
> >>
> >> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost -
> and
> >> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> >> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
> >> idea
> >> of the lot so far)
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> >> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
> >>
> >> Lagi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
> give
> >> a
> >> > longer trial a shot at some point.
> >> >
> >> > Kind regards,
> >> >
> >> > Kevin
> >> >
> >> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> >> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >> >
> >> > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> >> > use-livecode"  >> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > True, true.
> >> >
> >> > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
> around
> >> > 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Sorry it's worse than I thought.It's 10th generation with 4 cores and 8
logical processors.

Appleworks was blazingly fast on my 64K 1Mhz Apple 2  and so was Borland
Turbo Pascal on my Microsoft Z80 card on said machine - software is going
backwards speed wise.

Lagi

On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 23:00, Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Lagi,
>
> I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
> points needing to be addressed.
>
> Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.
>
> Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
> platform?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
> > something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
> > way
> > so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
> >
> >  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
> > and by the time they answer
> > you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
> >
> > The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
> > (whichever comes first).
> >
> > This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
> > for 6 months but it times out anyway.
> > Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice
> so
> > it will last 30 days.
> >
> > This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
> > rushing.
> >
> > The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> > customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
> > who want to give it a good try.
> >
> > You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
> > button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> > brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
> >
> > But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running
> on a
> > 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
> > treacle.
> >
> > If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
> less
> > than 30 minutes.
> >
> > You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"
> to
> > schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
> >
> > It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
> > some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> > student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
> idea
> > of the lot so far)
> >
> >
> > Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> > stupid and not workable suggestions?.
> >
> > Lagi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well
> give a
> > > longer trial a shot at some point.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> > >
> > > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > > use-livecode"  > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > True, true.
> > >
> > > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack
> around
> > > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> > would
> > > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an
> option.
> > >
> > > Ralph DiMola
> > > IT Director
> > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kris

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
I literally begged. LOL

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:59 PM Tom Glod  wrote:

> Lagi,
>
> I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
> points needing to be addressed.
>
> Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.
>
> Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
> platform?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
>> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
>> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
>> way
>> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
>>
>>  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
>> and by the time they answer
>> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
>>
>> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
>> (whichever comes first).
>>
>> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
>> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
>> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
>> it will last 30 days.
>>
>> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
>> rushing.
>>
>> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
>> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
>> who want to give it a good try.
>>
>> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
>> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
>> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
>>
>> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on
>> a
>> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
>> treacle.
>>
>> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in
>> less
>> than 30 minutes.
>>
>> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
>> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>>
>> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
>> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
>> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid
>> idea
>> of the lot so far)
>>
>>
>> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
>> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>>
>> Lagi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>
>> > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give
>> a
>> > longer trial a shot at some point.
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
>> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>> >
>> > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
>> > use-livecode" > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > True, true.
>> >
>> > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
>> > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
>> > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
>> > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
>> would
>> > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
>> >
>> > Ralph DiMola
>> > IT Director
>> > Evergreen Information Services
>> > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>> >
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com]
>> On
>> > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
>> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
>> > To: How to use LiveCode
>> > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
>> > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>> >
>> > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
>> > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
>> > download that.
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Kevin
>> 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Lagi,

I wrote to Kevin earlier and gave the exact same advice. those exact 2
points needing to be addressed.

Give long trial, fix the most obvious IDE issues ASAP.

Without those two things how is any new developer going to join the
platform?



On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:34 PM Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
> something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the
> way
> so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.
>
>  You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
> and by the time they answer
> you get cheesed off and remove the  program.
>
> The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
> (whichever comes first).
>
> This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
> for 6 months but it times out anyway.
> Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
> it will last 30 days.
>
> This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
> rushing.
>
> The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
> customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
> who want to give it a good try.
>
> You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
> button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
> brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).
>
> But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on a
> 16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
> treacle.
>
> If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in less
> than 30 minutes.
>
> You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
> schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.
>
> It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
> some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
> student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid idea
> of the lot so far)
>
>
> Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
> stupid and not workable suggestions?.
>
> Lagi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give a
> > longer trial a shot at some point.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >
> > On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> > use-livecode"  > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > True, true.
> >
> > There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> > but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> > programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> > supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I
> would
> > not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
> >
> > Ralph DiMola
> > IT Director
> >     Evergreen Information Services
> > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> > Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> > To: How to use LiveCode
> > Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> > Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >
> > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> > non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> > download that.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> > LiveCode: Develop Yourself
> >
> > On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> > via use-livecode"  > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there
> >
> > I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >
> > That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Trials of 14 days or even 30 days are a waste of time. I can install
something and use it for a couple of days - then life / work gets in the way
so It sits on the computer for 31 days and then times out.

 You then have to waste your time and the companies to get an extension,
and by the time they answer
you get cheesed off and remove the  program.

The BEST trial is the one that lasts for 30 actual executions or 6 months
(whichever comes first).

This stops the clever  SOD who decides to keep it running without exiting
for 6 months but it times out anyway.
Even better if he keeps it on for 2 days it counts as "executing" twice so
it will last 30 days.

This means I have 30 days over a 6 month period to really test it without
rushing.

The people who would game the system are the people who won't be loyal
customer anyway, so not giving a worthwhile trial period handicaps those
who want to give it a good try.

You can also put a  nag screen  at the start of any executable with an OK
button  link to a special discounted price - free marketing (what a
brilliant Idea, why didn't I think of it?).

But the best way of selling it is to FIX the bloody IDE - I am running on a
16G 1 year Old 8th Generation CoreI7  processor and it  STILL runs like
treacle.

If I downloaded it today as a new person it would be off my machine in less
than 30 minutes.

You could also use this as your "marketing" system by "giving it away"  to
schools for nothing and without the trial period but the nag screen.

It can then be used by the students to learn programming at no cost - and
some of the students parent might pony up for a paid for version at a
student price (with no expiring standalones of cours - the most stupid idea
of the lot so far)


Anyway Kevin, have I/we wastedour time again putting out these cranky,
stupid and not workable suggestions?.

Lagi







On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 15:55, Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give a
> longer trial a shot at some point.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via
> use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> True, true.
>
> There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around
> but you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a
> programming IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other
> supporting files, SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I would
> not dismiss this out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
>
> Ralph DiMola
> IT Director
> Evergreen Information Services
> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free
> non-app building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just
> download that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen
> via use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-l

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Kevin,

Keeping a short trial gives the impression of a lack of confidence in the
platforms ability to prove and provide its value.

a 90 day trial would allow people to really dive in, to start on their
project, and help to ensure that decisions are not rushed.

I just can't see how a short trial works better for livecode.  It literally
forces people to decide, and when they are forced to decide, that may put
the company on the losing end.

Let the platform prove its value to the user.

60 or 90 days projects confidence.10 days does not.

Just my 2 cents on that..

Thanks,

Tom



On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 1:28 PM Keith Clarke via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> I came to Livecode from lightweight website hackery - cobbling together
> HTML & CSS as a non-coder (using W3schools guidance for every live of
> javascript). I was (and still am) relieved by the higher-level English-like
> language of Livecode.
>
> None of the (dozens of) utilities I’ve created for my personal & small
> business use have ever needed to move beyond the IDE - or a single card for
> that matter. The Livecode IDE has become a personal toolbelt item for me.
>
> If the Livecode team can keep this ‘personal toolbelt’ IDE concept
> available to students for free (and home users for little) - the way
> Microsoft does with Office - could bring through the next generation of
> paying developers. But one doesn’t reach the long-term without passing
> through the short-term. So, meanwhile, they need to do what they must to
> keep the ship afloat and the crew inspired.
>
> Just my tuppence-worth.
> Best,
> Keith
>
> > On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:50, Roger Guay via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like a very cool idea to me, but I’m sure it’s complicated! I
> trust LC to do what’s best for its future.
> >
> > Roger
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 2, 2021, at 7:34 AM, Keith Martin via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think this is (potentially) an excellent idea. Running stacks is more
> important in education use than building standalones, and the knowledge
> that a standalone CAN be made by simply ’trading up’ to a paid-for version
> of LC might be an interesting sell. But I would be surprised if this sort
> of thing hasn’t already been considered.
> >>
> >> k
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:20, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This is a good idea. I sometimes use the IDE to do a quickie text
> >>> manipulation task. A couple of buttons and some text file/db
> processing and
> >>> BOOM! It's done in the fraction of the time of other languages. I have
> now
> >>> done some text chunk coding that highlights many of LCs features. I
> can now
> >>> buy a platform or two If I want to expand the IDE to building
> distributable
> >>> apps.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph DiMola
> >>> IT Director
> >>> Evergreen Information Services
> >>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> Behalf
> >>> Of Michael Kristensen via use-livecode
> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 9:50 AM
> >>> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >>> Cc: Michael Kristensen
> >>> Subject: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >>>
> >>> Hi there
> >>>
> >>> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> >>>
> >>> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> >>>
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> use-livecode mailing list
> >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription
> >>> preferences:
> >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> use-livecode mailing list
> >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> use-livecode mailing list
> >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> >
> > ___
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
Tom Glod
Founder & Developer
MakeShyft R.D.A 

Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
I came to Livecode from lightweight website hackery - cobbling together HTML & 
CSS as a non-coder (using W3schools guidance for every live of javascript). I 
was (and still am) relieved by the higher-level English-like language of 
Livecode. 

None of the (dozens of) utilities I’ve created for my personal & small business 
use have ever needed to move beyond the IDE - or a single card for that matter. 
The Livecode IDE has become a personal toolbelt item for me.

If the Livecode team can keep this ‘personal toolbelt’ IDE concept available to 
students for free (and home users for little) - the way Microsoft does with 
Office - could bring through the next generation of paying developers. But one 
doesn’t reach the long-term without passing through the short-term. So, 
meanwhile, they need to do what they must to keep the ship afloat and the crew 
inspired.

Just my tuppence-worth.
Best,
Keith   

> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:50, Roger Guay via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Sounds like a very cool idea to me, but I’m sure it’s complicated! I trust LC 
> to do what’s best for its future.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
>> On Sep 2, 2021, at 7:34 AM, Keith Martin via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is (potentially) an excellent idea. Running stacks is more 
>> important in education use than building standalones, and the knowledge that 
>> a standalone CAN be made by simply ’trading up’ to a paid-for version of LC 
>> might be an interesting sell. But I would be surprised if this sort of thing 
>> hasn’t already been considered.
>> 
>> k
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:20, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is a good idea. I sometimes use the IDE to do a quickie text
>>> manipulation task. A couple of buttons and some text file/db processing and
>>> BOOM! It's done in the fraction of the time of other languages. I have now
>>> done some text chunk coding that highlights many of LCs features. I can now
>>> buy a platform or two If I want to expand the IDE to building distributable
>>> apps.
>>> 
>>> Ralph DiMola
>>> IT Director
>>> Evergreen Information Services
>>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
>>> Of Michael Kristensen via use-livecode
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 9:50 AM
>>> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Cc: Michael Kristensen
>>> Subject: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>>> 
>>> Hi there
>>> 
>>> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>>> 
>>> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>>> 
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
>>> preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
A web only version however that allowed you to learn and experiment with the 
language and develop free and open source server side code would not suffer 
this limitation. You would not be able to use that to build apps.

There are options to retain open source community versions that do not 
canabalise the app making aspect of the business.

    Schedule a call with me
On 2 Sep 2021, 15:31 +0100, Kevin Miller via use-livecode 
, wrote:
> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app 
> building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via 
> use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
That’s an interesting idea.

I’m wondering if a bit of terminology is helpful here - there seem to be two 
distinct things that have been put together previously - community and open 
source.

The needs of the two are not always aligned - especially with LiveCode where an 
easy to use well documented and low cost community edition is not necessarily 
the sane as an open source software that might be quite geeky.

For me it makes more sense for LiveCode LTD to focus on easy to use products 
that are packaged for community and commercial use, while the open source 
aspect fits the needs of more specialised developers.

We could achieve both, that is your proposal for a non-app building open source 
version for easy introduction and learning of the language and something 
developers would find interesting to work on - if the focus was on the core of 
the language that runs on the server.

That way there can be a web experience which is accessible, but you would want 
to buy the commercial edition if you wanted to develop apps and leverage more 
advanced tools.

    Schedule a call with me
On 2 Sep 2021, 14:51 +0100, Michael Kristensen via use-livecode 
, wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
I don't know how much of a difference the compiling/building makes. While
it is true that anyone who wants to "run an app" (even that's obviously
incorrect, since stacks <> apps) can just download the free version, there
is no way for that author to protect the source. Is that enough of an
incentive for someone to pay up - so they can build an app instead of
distributing an unlocked stack? I don't know. Will cutting them off from
tsNet, or building/distributing mobile/server/web matter? Again, dunno.
I am curious to know how much business any firm generates from either a
trial or from a free version - like how many people take a flier and then
decide to pay up as a result. My hunch is that more people grow from a free
version to a paid version than grow from a free trial to a paid version. I
think free trials are more like test drives.
At any rate, I'm hoping that LC can make money.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:52 AM Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> True, true.
>
> There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around but
> you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a programming
> IDE and explain how to run the stack along with any other supporting files,
> SW or plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I would not dismiss this
> out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.
>
> Ralph DiMola
> IT Director
> Evergreen Information Services
> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On
> Behalf Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
> Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app
> building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via
> use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
   and did a little diving.
And God said, "This is good."
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
We *are* considering the length of the trial actively, we may well give a 
longer trial a shot at some point.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 15:51, "use-livecode on behalf of Ralph DiMola via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

True, true.

There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around but 
you would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a programming IDE 
and explain how to run the stack along with any other supporting files, SW or 
plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I would not dismiss this 
out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.

Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net


-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf 
Of Kevin Miller via use-livecode
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
To: How to use LiveCode
Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
    Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app 
building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

Hi there

I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

Michael

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


RE: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
True, true.

There could be a small group of programmers that pass a stack around but you 
would not be able to convince/teach a civilian to install a programming IDE and 
explain how to run the stack along with any other supporting files, SW or 
plug-ins... Mobile would be a non-starter. I would not dismiss this 
out-of-hand. A 90 day free IDE could also be an option.

Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net


-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of 
Kevin Miller via use-livecode
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 10:31 AM
To: How to use LiveCode
Cc: Kevin Miller; Michael Kristensen
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app 
building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

Hi there

I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

Michael

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
Sounds like a very cool idea to me, but I’m sure it’s complicated! I trust LC 
to do what’s best for its future.

Roger


> On Sep 2, 2021, at 7:34 AM, Keith Martin via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> I think this is (potentially) an excellent idea. Running stacks is more 
> important in education use than building standalones, and the knowledge that 
> a standalone CAN be made by simply ’trading up’ to a paid-for version of LC 
> might be an interesting sell. But I would be surprised if this sort of thing 
> hasn’t already been considered.
> 
> k
> 
> 
>> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:20, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> This is a good idea. I sometimes use the IDE to do a quickie text
>> manipulation task. A couple of buttons and some text file/db processing and
>> BOOM! It's done in the fraction of the time of other languages. I have now
>> done some text chunk coding that highlights many of LCs features. I can now
>> buy a platform or two If I want to expand the IDE to building distributable
>> apps.
>> 
>> Ralph DiMola
>> IT Director
>> Evergreen Information Services
>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
>> Of Michael Kristensen via use-livecode
>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 9:50 AM
>> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Cc: Michael Kristensen
>> Subject: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>> 
>> Hi there
>> 
>> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>> 
>> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
Everyone who needs to run an app can download an old installer to run (and
build) it right now. There will always be a subset of people looking to
game a given system but thinking in the positive, a non committal download
that doesn't allow builds is a great way to reduce friction

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:31 PM Kevin Miller via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app
> building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Develop Yourself
>
> On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via
> use-livecode"  use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
>
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Keith Martin via use-livecode
I think this is (potentially) an excellent idea. Running stacks is more 
important in education use than building standalones, and the knowledge that a 
standalone CAN be made by simply ’trading up’ to a paid-for version of LC might 
be an interesting sell. But I would be surprised if this sort of thing hasn’t 
already been considered.

k


> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:20, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> This is a good idea. I sometimes use the IDE to do a quickie text
> manipulation task. A couple of buttons and some text file/db processing and
> BOOM! It's done in the fraction of the time of other languages. I have now
> done some text chunk coding that highlights many of LCs features. I can now
> buy a platform or two If I want to expand the IDE to building distributable
> apps.
> 
> Ralph DiMola
> IT Director
> Evergreen Information Services
> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
> Of Michael Kristensen via use-livecode
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 9:50 AM
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Cc: Michael Kristensen
> Subject: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> 
> Hi there
> 
> I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition
> 
> That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.
> 
> Michael
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Kevin Miller via use-livecode
Thanks for the constructive suggestion. Unfortunately with a free non-app 
building version, everyone who needs to run an app can just download that.

Kind regards,

Kevin

Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Develop Yourself

On 02/09/2021, 14:49, "use-livecode on behalf of Michael Kristensen via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

Hi there

I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

Michael

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


RE: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

2021-09-02 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
This is a good idea. I sometimes use the IDE to do a quickie text
manipulation task. A couple of buttons and some text file/db processing and
BOOM! It's done in the fraction of the time of other languages. I have now
done some text chunk coding that highlights many of LCs features. I can now
buy a platform or two If I want to expand the IDE to building distributable
apps.

Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net

-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Michael Kristensen via use-livecode
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2021 9:50 AM
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Cc: Michael Kristensen
Subject: Suggestion: Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

Hi there

I suggest that there could be a Non-Appbuilding Community Edition

That would be for personal use, and to learn coding.

Michael

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode