Re: Why are locking size and position treated as one?

2010-02-05 Thread Bob Sneidar
I think your question wasn't answered because it could be taken as rhetorical. I've come across other properties that I thought ought to be on the pallette but were not. I suppose at some point, someone in a room somewhere who makes a lot more money than me has to decide that there will only be

Re: Why are locking size and position treated as one?

2010-02-05 Thread Andre Garzia
Mark, very good question, I have no answer. You can fake your locks with script if you want to decouple them. Cheers andre On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mark Swindell mdswind...@cruzio.com wrote: I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try again. Why are

Re: Why are locking size and position treated as one?

2010-02-05 Thread Devin Asay
On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mark Swindell wrote: I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try again. Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked? They seem to me to be two separate entities. I know how to get around the situation via

Re: Why are locking size and position treated as one?

2010-02-05 Thread Mark Swindell
Thanks Devin. I gave it some votes and added a plea for a change. Looks like the report has languished since 2005, v. 2.5. Perhaps others can add to it. Mark On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Devin Asay wrote: On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mark Swindell wrote: I asked this a couple of days