Some people say that they find the RR Documentation
inaccessible and awkward to use.
I have just downloaded a really super MetaCard stack:
mcdictionary28b1.mc
it comes as a ZIP file from the Yahoo MC IDE Group:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MC_IDE/files/
and then I did the following:
1.
I was looking at the stack "internet.rev" and I noticed it called the
Rev dictionary. The command is the following
docOpenDictionaryWithFilter "*answer*"
if you want to see the keywords with "answer" in it.
Best,
Francois
Francois Chaplais
35 rue Saint-Honore
77305 Fontainebleau Cedex
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Josh Mellicker wrote:
I put up a "proof-of-concept" Revolution Online Open Dictionary.
Pretty cool Josh!
Mark Talluto
--
CANELA Software
http://www.canelasoftware.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@li
This looks great! Thanks, Josh!
Best,
Mark
On 29 Oct 2007, at 18:05, Josh Mellicker wrote:
http://revcoders.org/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscr
oops, forgot to say where it is! :-o
http://revcoders.org/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listin
I put up a "proof-of-concept" Revolution Online Open Dictionary.
Functionally it is like the MySQL & PHP open dictionaries - a simple
page per term with user comments. Users can also edit the term
definition itself.
I spent very little time, so a lot is not working yet, just thought
I'd s
One of the particular challenges in software documentation (and boy
have I experienced this) is that you have to know what something is
called before you can find it. That is often the frustation, not
that the information is missing, but because I call it something
else, I cannot access it.
H
While playing with docslib_by_bvg.rev ,I have discovered that the
dictionnary entries have a "categories" key, and, it is not empty!
actually, it oftens includes several lines, so maybe a reason why it
is not displayed in the current dict (studio 2.8.1 for me) is that it
cannot be sorted (?)
rogramming (mostly on the Mac
platform). The documentation is not going to get better without someone that is
a real writer/communicator attending to it. Blogs are fine in a particular
context, but for me, they only provide fragmentary glimpses of larger
structures. To gain the (critical) big
Light and parsimonious are too different things. The HyperCard books
are big because they are fairly exhaustive, but the exposition is
tight with well-chosen yet relatively simple examples that encourage
you to think of other uses for the commands and functions.
Mathematica has made some
Le 28 oct. 07, à 01:14, mfstuart a écrit :
Andre, BvG...
Any chance the Docu + WebNotes can be a "standalone"? - .exe file
Mark
Chances are that, if you want it to be a standalone, this will be for
use outside the IDE. This would require that
1) either the documentation
new
> server uses a different scheme for the FTP users so the old login
> can't be used.
>
> More info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
>
> Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
> just did the webnotes part. This syst
Le 27 oct. 07, à 18:31, Andre Garzia a écrit :
François,
This is something related to BvG Docu, not webnotes. The webnotes are
stored in the web, they simply don't care about any system or version
of anything. The thing that BvG Docu has a reference to my
documentation folder is because I simp
rs so the old login
> > can't be used.
> >
> > More info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
> >
> > Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
> > just did the webnotes part. This system is naive, we could
> > can't be used.
> >
> > More info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
> >
> > Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
> > just did the webnotes part. This system is naive, we could do
> > something better if
r the FTP users so the old login
can't be used.
More info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
hello from paris. I just downloaded you stack, and the same problem
keeps popping:
If I use the stack as provided, it cannot access the documentation
files because my con
w
> server uses a different scheme for the FTP users so the old login
> can't be used.
>
> More info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
>
> Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
> just did the webnotes part. This system
I wonder if what we need is some standardised format for rev doc
webnotes?
Though I lke the idea of one centralised source/repository, it will
require someone to host it and maintain it, and though Andre (with
BvG Docu-webnotes), and others (with wikis, web-pages etc.) have
kindly shown w
e info and download at: http://andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
just did the webnotes part. This system is naive, we could do
something better if we worked together.
:-D
anyway, it is a cool way to share information. There are
notes.html
Please take note that all the documentation stuff is done by BvG, I
just did the webnotes part. This system is naive, we could do
something better if we worked together.
:-D
anyway, it is a cool way to share information. There are some test
notes in there
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:23:17 +1000, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Mick Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll throw in my 2 cents worth here. After seeing the ad in a Rev
>> newsletter or some place like that, I got the Beginning Programming
>> for Dummies, and I was very, very, very d
Hello Friends,
the webnotes server is down at the moment. It will resume shortly with
enhanced abilities... since BvG called me Crazy, and I take that as a
cumpliment, I'll try to push this forward. Just let me have my dinner
and take a bath, been a long day here in Brazil.
The webnotes addon to
tive...
I like help and info as well, unfortunately help is both a Rev constant and
a message, which in the case of the message, embarrassingly the Rev IDE (at
least on my system) doesn't use to bring up the Documentation.
So 'manual' & 'man' or 'information' &
Just a small comment, from whose post I now do not recall,
How intuitive will "man" be to non-*nixophiles?
Help or Info seems more intuitive...
Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, u
On 10/27/07, Mick Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll throw in my 2 cents worth here. After seeing the ad in a Rev
> newsletter or some place like that, I got the Beginning Programming
> for Dummies, and I was very, very, very disappointed. Among other
> things it seems like whoever wrote t
I'll throw in my 2 cents worth here. After seeing the ad in a Rev
newsletter or some place like that, I got the Beginning Programming
for Dummies, and I was very, very, very disappointed. Among other
things it seems like whoever wrote the Rev parts (and they were
sparser or fewer than I e
Le 26 oct. 07, à 17:02, Luis a écrit :
'help' or 'info'?
Cheers,
Luis.
'help' is really good
Francois
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
On 26 Oct 2007, at 06:42, François Chaplais wrote:
To make things simple, a VERY nice (and IMHO, simple) improvement on
the rev online doc would by the ability to send a "doc" command with
syntax
"doc string"
where string may be anything
and which would have the same effect as typing the stri
'help' or 'info'?
Cheers,
Luis.
On 26 Oct 2007, at 15:42, Kay C Lan wrote:
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My only question is whether "doc" is the best token for us. It
seems a
bit general, perhaps hard to discern it's for Transcript dictionary
lookups.
Any sugg
Kay C Lan wrote:
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin wrote:
My only question is whether "doc" is the best token for us. It seems a
bit general, perhaps hard to discern it's for Transcript dictionary
lookups.
Any suggestions for alternatives?
manual, or the abbreviation man
I like it better than "
Le 26 oct. 07, à 13:38, Mark Smith a écrit :
Is the webnotes server up? I don't seem to be getting any of the notes
that I think exist, and posting new ones doesn't seem to be working...
Did you rebuild the database (or whaterver you may call it)? I did
because the stack could not accesst he
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My only question is whether "doc" is the best token for us. It seems a
> bit general, perhaps hard to discern it's for Transcript dictionary
> lookups.
>
> Any suggestions for alternatives?
manual, or the abbreviation man
Is the webnotes server up? I don't seem to be getting any of the
notes that I think exist, and posting new ones doesn't seem to be
working...
Best,
Mark
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscr
François Chaplais wrote:
To make things simple, a VERY nice (and IMHO, simple) improvement on
the rev online doc would by the ability to send a "doc" command with
syntax
"doc string"
where string may be anything
and which would have the same effect as typing the string in the search
field of
Le 26 oct. 07, à 05:55, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation
huh? pages? do you mean paper pages? Or do you mean the online doc? (I
do not mention the pdf which is not finished).
OK, I have just spent the night looking at DocsLib by BvG, and i'm
tire
As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free
with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;)
iPerCard?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation was authored by the
> DeVoto mentioned above, using a style guideline very similar to the one
> she used for "HyperTalk 2.2: The Book".
I was more partial to Dan's 'The Complete Book of
Kay C Lan wrote:
People shouldn't be saying the Rev Docs should be this or that. People
should be complaining that Goodman, Shafer, DeVoto, Progue et al have failed
to see the vast market of purchasers, stepped into the void to wield their
talent in the direction of Rev books.
The majority of R
On 10/26/07, Stephen Barncard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The original manuals were more than skimpy.
>
> I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
>
>
> >The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
> >elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
> >
> > Gregory
I agree with Gregory. I loved the Hypercard documentation: clear,
well-organized, concise, nice examples. I'm looking at the Hypercard Script
Language Guide right now. It's 583 pages. I wouldn't call that skimpy.
--
Regards,
Howard Bornstein
---
www.designeq.com - Hide quoted
And of course Danny Goodman.
The original manuals were more than skimpy.
I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
--
stephen barncard
--
stephen barncar
On 10/25/07, Timothy Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>
> > I learnt RR by trial and error, old HC knowledge
> > (founded on Danny goodman's EXCELLENT book...)
>
> Me too. However, in my case, my understanding and skill have not
> grown
The original manuals were more than skimpy.
I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
--
stephen barncard
s a n f r a n c i s c o
- - - - - - - - - - - -
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage yo
Le 25 oct. 07, à 23:38, François Chaplais a écrit :
A fine point here actually. I do not have access to the 2.6.1
documentation. At this second, I am considering a "buttons for
dummies" stack which, among other things, point to the Rev docs. I do
not want to go into the details of parsing the
their
documentation, this would be fine.
Anybody from runRev can attempt an answer to this issue in this mailing
list?
Very best
Francois
It is extremely simple to hive-off the Documentation
stack from 2.6.1 as a renamed stack so that 2.8.1
users could have it as a documentation s
What is missing exactly?
The dictionary is a pretty good version of a man page. Dan's book is ok at the
level of 'how to think like a computer scientist' - simple how to get
started. Very nice as far as it goes. Needs a second
edition. The pdf is ok also as a printable version of the diction
Are the docs all being redone for the 3.0 release? If they are then
maybe none of this matters. And speaking of 3.0, is there a
projected timeline for that yet?
Mark
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "How to use Revolution"
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:49 PM
Subject: The Documentation
It seems there aren't many RR users like me, at present. The majority of
discussion on the use-rev list is over my head, for instance. Most users
seem much
I agree, it does seem fairly inconsistent.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 24 Oct 2007, at 21:36, François Chaplais wrote:
revolution's documentation is bad mainly because the syntax of
Transcript has departed from the natural english approach of Bill
Atkinson to more a conventional one like function
On 10/24/07, François Chaplais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean, why this XML stuff?
While I'm not in complete agreement on how RR implemented their XML
docs, it does make a lot of sense to do it that way.
Using XML, others can reuse the documentation content in many
different
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
If RR is to go from, frankly, a niche RAD... into the killer App
it should
be (or, to be extremely corny, "the killer App
HyperCard once was")... it needs documentation that will allow
people to
follow a cognitive apprenticeship fast
On 10/25/07, Richmond Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What has not been addressed are:
A whole lot removed
Whilst everything you said is very valid if I were Danny Goodman, Dan Shafer
or David Pogue writing a book to be sold. IMO it doesn't apply to this
'dream'. I don't believe t
e not .doc)). Especially as the
documentation is bound to grow, having it all in memory is quite a
memory muncher. On the other hand, loading and unloading a stack is
quite an intensive task in rev, so having each entry as a separate
stack can't really work well either. I do not like how x
improving documention.
-
I guess one issue could be:
Can the documentation be used if the user is not online?
Not everyone will be developing while connected, for various reasons.
Perhaps the ability to download an updated section on libURL, or
arrays, or
custom properties, for use off-line.
-
questions at all -
2. Heirarchy of difficulty.
my comments on these two. The first obvious thing is that quite a
number of persons are dissatisfied with the documentation that
Revolution provides. Until now, most (if not all) the answers implied a
user community effort to provide a better doc
( e.g. educators,
professional computer programmers, pensioners who want
to try programming, and so on, ad nauseam) . . .
I sat my 11 year-old (well, now he's a 12 year-old)
down in front of my Mac mini and DC 2.6.1 and told him
to get on with things and read the documentation: he,
predictably
Planning such an effort so it will serve well into the future is difficult.
I only mention them as food for thought and not something that should delay
progress on improving documention.
-
I guess one issue could be:
Can the documentation be used if the user is not online?
Not everyone will be
Aside from the public 'notes', there should also be a private area.
Not everyone is online all the time, and some personal notes may just
be a reinterpretation of the public notes.
Should the 'online' notes be downloaded to a local DB for offline
access? Indicated by a change in border colou
On 10/24/07, Mark Swindell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Talk seems to keep coming around to a Wiki, but I'm not sure what
> advantage that has over a "perfected" BvG Docu plugin.
I'm with you Mark.
Whilst the offers to whip up some PHP, HTML and JavaScript are to be
commended, in the end it
I'm curious what others on this thread think of the BvG Docu model
with the webnotes enhancement from Andre Garzia? http://
www.runrev.com/newsletter/may/issue27/newsletter4.php
Talk seems to keep coming around to a Wiki, but I'm not sure what
advantage that has over a "perfected" BvG Docu
Perhaps it's a good idea to "take a page from" the PHP doc:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-info.php
as well as the excellent MySQL html docs.
It's like a wiki, where there's the "official" explanation at the
top, then a lot of very helpful examples, code snippets and comments
b
On Oct 23, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
I strongly agree. MySQL uses the same sort of thing and I find it
incredibly useful. However I believe that for this to last and have
credibility, it needs to be done by RunRev themselves.
I agree... but they are awfully busy folks... and mayb
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
However I believe that for this to last and have credibility, it
needs to be done by RunRev themselves.
Another plus for a plugin that mods the docs: it can be bundled,
requiring RunRev to do close to nothing to deliver it to everyone with
every install.
Users get the
On 10/24/07, Josh Mellicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's a good idea to "take a page from" the PHP doc:
>
> http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-info.php
>
> It's like a wiki, where there's the "official" explanation at the
> top, then a lot of very helpful examples, code snippet
Perhaps it's a good idea to "take a page from" the PHP doc:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-info.php
It's like a wiki, where there's the "official" explanation at the
top, then a lot of very helpful examples, code snippets and comments
below from the community on each page.
I co
Yes Peter, I believe you are correct.
The current documentation, does suffice for people like myself. But, we have
had the luxury of starting with Jeanne DeVoto's excellent help stacks,
including Richard Gaskin's primer which IMO have yet to be equaled since in
terms of ease-of use and accessibili
On 20 Oct 2007, at 12:24, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Surely the current approach is only explicable in terms of a strategy
which
says, stay in the present niche? Not that its a bad thing, of course.
Not
that it is a mistaken strategy, not at all. Just how it surely is?
Actually every program
It is clear to anyone who has read the documentation on other programming
languages that Rev is very different in its approach. There is one printed
book: Dan Shafer's. There's an incomplete pdf which, the last time I
looked, had not been extended for over a year, though the prefac
No, I'm referring to BvG, written by Björnke von Gierke and modified
by Andre Garzia, which allows for users to append the standard
documentation via webnotes, which is functionally similar to what
happens in a Wiki.
See this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--BvG-Docu-gets-an-add-on-AAG-
Maybe I'm missing something. Where is the wiki-like user interface?
Are you referring to Richmond Mathewson's wiki?
Tim
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Mark Swindell wrote:
I feel that the document structure Bjornke and Andre have crafted
offers the best of both worlds.
It makes use of the
The following are possible:
1. A link to the wiki in the RR Documentation stack.
2. A stack that could periodically download the wiki
into itself.
As RR now allows one to build functioning web-browsers
it might be a good idea to have a dedicated stack in
the UI that accesses the wiki "at eh clic
I feel that the document structure Bjornke and Andre have crafted
offers the best of both worlds.
It makes use of the official docs while integrating what is
functionally an editable, wiki-like user interface for user
extensions, clarifications, and examples. Web-based Wikis can't
match
Since you failed to use the haiku form, Dr. Miller, I will lend my aid.
User Manual
Written With Others In Mind
Who will tend to it?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manag
Timothy Miller wrote:
"Docs too terse. Experienced users comprehend. Others
struggle."
Many people have accused me of prolixity; never the
reverse :)
I am perfectly happy to supply the password for the
wiki to those who e-mail me off list and have
recognisable names - don't really want the wiki
Docs too terse. Experienced users comprehend. Others struggle.
Tim
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman
wiki ? wiki ? wiki ?
the thing is just sitting there rotting: go and get on
with it!
http://richmondsrevolution.pbwiki.com/
Sorry, chaps and chapesses, I am currently "up to my
eyes in poo" (meaning, work) so cannot attend to it.
Love, Richmond
_
http://richmondsrevolution.pbwiki.com/
Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolut
While looking for it, I came across this:
http://www.revdeveloper.com/include/wiki/rev/doku.php?id=en:porting:cross-platform_hypercard
Judy
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, User wrote:
Richmond actually set one up, and I put in a few entries (sorry, can't
remember where the wiki is... Richmond???).
Jud
Richmond actually set one up, and I put in a few entries (sorry, can't
remember where the wiki is... Richmond???).
Judy
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Mikey wrote:
we desperately need
a) a wiki
and
b) a better-organized sample project database so that six months from
now some n00b will be able to find
we desperately need
a) a wiki
and
b) a better-organized sample project database so that six months from
now some n00b will be able to find this.
and
c) A standard "you-gotta-download -this" package of tools for new rev users.
I feel a list coming on, so I'll start:
1. RevZilla
Just to make things clear, BvG Docu is originally by me, and can be
found on my website. But the web notes version is of course by Andre,
our resident web maniac...
get it while supplies last:
http://www.andregarzia.com/docuwebnotes.html
have fun
Bjoernke
On 17 Oct 2007, at 07:07, Mark Swinde
That idea could almost be called gifted given to excellent response we
normally get from the experts on this list... Jim
on 10/17/07 2:07 AM, Mark Swindell wrote:
> I think BvG is a great idea. I wish Revolution would embrace the
> idea and enhance and integrate the interface. It could really
Le 17 oct. 07, à 04:05, Kay C Lan a écrit :
Titled: [ANN] BvG Docu
Date: 16 Apr 2007
By: Björnke von Gierke
This great little App allows you to view the 2.8 docs in a different
way.
Further more the App was 'enhanced' by the wonderfully talented Andre
Garzia. Look up thread:
Titled: [ANN] B
I think BvG is a great idea. I wish Revolution would embrace the
idea and enhance and integrate the interface. It could really solve
a lot of complaints and provide a wiki-like solution for user
enhanced docs. still very much under control of the mother ship.
Mark
On Oct 16, 2007, at 7:0
On 10/17/07, François Chaplais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have
> a question here:
> there is a field labeled "Notes" in the dictionnary (vers. 2.8.1). It
> would be very nice if users could modify it to put comments etc.. Does
> somebody now of a way to do this?
>
> You may wish to look up a
François Chaplais wrote:
"version 2.6.1... looks much better organized than in
version 2.8.1"
Hmm, there is a question of licencing here; but (?) I
suppose people who own licences to 2.8.1 may in some
way be allowed access to components from 2.6.1.
It is extremely simple to hi
Le 14 oct. 07, à 22:47, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
is much maligned in RR; and, not always, needlessly .
. .
But; to find out about opening other programs from
within RR tool me
2 minutes with the Documentation (DC 2.6.1);
a lot of time would be saved by folk if they went
there first and
is much maligned in RR; and, not always, needlessly .
. .
But; to find out about opening other programs from
within RR tool me
2 minutes with the Documentation (DC 2.6.1);
a lot of time would be saved by folk if they went
there first and did a bit of lateral thinking before
they popped messages
Just a note to the person who is responsible for the documentation...
When you type "print" in the docs, you will get some information on a
very nice feature: "revPrintReport"...
But it must be a hidden feature, because all references in this part
of the docs are invisib
I can regularly make the Documentation stack fail to show items that
I'm searching for, but I don't understand what causes it. For
example, I was messing around with a stack this afternoon, and I
wanted to check something out about the substacks property. So I went
to the documenta
There it is under the Help Menu. I forgot those things were there.
Tom
On Mar 28, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Anyone? I looked and looked and couldn't find anything under:
keyboard
shortcuts
keys
Seems an obvious one. A noob asked me offline about it, and
unfortunately, I couldn't answe
Tip: You can also use several shortcuts to open an object's script.
See the Shortcuts section of the documentation for more.
But of course I can't find a "Shortcuts" section...
Tom
On Mar 28, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Anyone? I looked and looked and co
help/quick reference/shortcut reference.
Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Chipp Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Use-Revolution"
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 5:47 PM
Subject: Is there a list of the keyboard shortcuts in the documentation?
Anyone? I looked an
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Chipp Walters
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 09:48
> To: Use-Revolution
> Subject: Is there a list of the keyboard shortcuts in the
> documentation?
>
> Anyone? I looked and looked and couldn't find anythi
Chipp Walters wrote:
Anyone? I looked and looked and couldn't find anything under:
keyboard
shortcuts
keys
I'll see if I can add it to my third-party ref after I finish the list
of object messages.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database
Anyone? I looked and looked and couldn't find anything under:
keyboard
shortcuts
keys
Seems an obvious one. A noob asked me offline about it, and
unfortunately, I couldn't answer :-(
-Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
On Sep 21, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Pat Trendler wrote:
Mark,
It's in Rev Online, Learning Centre,Sample Work, Sample Scripts
Pat.
Thanks Pat. Looks like there are references in the dictionary to items
in the Cookbook that do not exist. I'll go bugzilla them.
--
Best regards,
Mark Talluto
http://www.
Mark,
It's in Rev Online, Learning Centre,Sample Work, Sample Scripts
Pat.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Talluto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Revolution use Revolution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: Cookbook l
Would some kind soul show me where to find the much talked about
"cookbook" in the documentation? I have looked in: Topics,
Dictionary, Objects, and FAQ. I am guessing it is buried in there
somewhere, but after 20 minutes of poking around, I give up.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Ma
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
