Re: ssl in single nodes

2016-10-13 Thread Timothy McKernan
I was working off of the comments in the local.ini, which suggest using {couch_httpd, start_link, [https]} But your explanation makes it obvious. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > A common mistake is to use couch_httpd instead of chttpd

Re: ssl in single nodes

2016-10-13 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
A common mistake is to use couch_httpd instead of chttpd when configuring the httpsd daemon. This; {couch_httpd, start_link, [https]} will configure a new SSL-enabled listener equivalent to :5986, the node-local port. This port should not bound to anything but 127.0.0.1, so SSL-enabling it

ssl in single nodes

2016-10-13 Thread Timothy McKernan
In my last post you told me (and the docs have always been clear in this regard) to use port 5984 on my single node, 2.0.0 build. If I use Fauxton to complete the single-node setup it asks for "Port that the Node uses" and defaults to 5984. So far this is all fine. I'm using ssl nearly

Re: httpd vs chttpd, and 5984 vs 5986

2016-10-13 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Ugh, that on is on me, sorry! Best Jan -- > On 13 Oct 2016, at 19:43, Timothy McKernan wrote: > > The setup endpoint was easy to use and I have a lot more confidence that > I've set it up correctly, thanks. > > The only thing that threw me was the endpoint name and

Re: httpd vs chttpd, and 5984 vs 5986

2016-10-13 Thread Timothy McKernan
The setup endpoint was easy to use and I have a lot more confidence that I've set it up correctly, thanks. The only thing that threw me was the endpoint name and json format are incorrect in the README. I was going to fork and fix it but it looks like

[NEWS] The CouchDB weekly news for October 13 is out!

2016-10-13 Thread Jenn Turner
Hello there! The CouchDB weekly news is now live at: https://blog.couchdb.org/2016/10/13/couchdb-weekly-news-october-13-2016/ Highlights include several news posts on CouchDB 2.0, a PouchDB use case, plus a little something on LaCroix. You can help us spread the news by sharing

Re: httpd vs chttpd, and 5984 vs 5986

2016-10-13 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Timothy McKernan wrote: > > You are right, I did skip over it. I apologize for the easy miss. > > If you'll bear with me, here is what I was seeing, and why I skipped over > it: I only use ssl and was trying to automate that step (for an