On 6/28/07, Johan Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/07, Tobias Ivarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the neo4j.org website:
...
Neo provides:
...
- an event framework with proactive and reactive events on
modification of the node space.
Actually, we haven't exposed
On 6/28/07, Tobias Ivarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the neo4j.org website:
...
Neo provides:
...
- an event framework with proactive and reactive events on
modification of the node space.
Actually, we haven't exposed the event framework yet in the new API.
But we'll try to get
Hi,
having an event mechanism in Neo4j is definitly a good idea. Just two
quick thoughts on that:
* consider integration into Spring's event stuff:
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#context-functionality-events
* using the proactive
Event support is a great idea.
Just in case people aren't aware of it, I've used the event bus project
http://www.eventbus.org/
with great success in that past, for in VM events. Maybe something to avoid
reinventing the wheel.
Jonny
___
Neo mailing
Based on the feedback we have received here we have created a draft of an
API for an event framework.
The semantics of the system that we have outlined are:
* There are two kinds of events - Database Lifecycle Events and Transaction
Events
* The interesting Lifecycle events are:
- before
...@neotechnology.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:43:24 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] Requirements for an event framework for Neo4j
Yes. I can tick of one of the use cases on my list of expected ones.
I would like some more input on this though. I'm assuming that you would
...@burningskysoftware.com wrote:
Hi, Tobias.
That's awesome news.
A few general questions regarding an event framework for Neo4J...
- In the current implementation, there's a thread affinity for
transactions.
I am guessing that this could create big challenges for proactive
handlers
seem the nicest solution.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:39:25 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo] Requirements for an event framework for Neo4j
Fellow developers!
The time has come to start the work on an event
whereas
db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.osgi.OSGiExtensionLoader - Bundle org.neo4j.lucene-index:
Service org.neo4j.graphdb.index.IndexProvider registered with implementation
org.neo4j.graphdb.index.IndexProvider[lucene
I don't remember the exact english name but...
are you, in fact, planning some kind of stored function (like PLSQL in
postgresql) ?
(exemple of stored function : BEFORE INSERT ON something FOR EACH
ROW EXECUTE someFunction() )
--
Laurent ker2x Laborde
Sysadmin DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/
No, we are not planning to build a component for stored procedures. The
event framework could be used to build such a system though. That is: we are
not building a system for stored procedures, but we are planning a framework
that could be used to build it.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010
Hi
I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger an action like setting
a property on another node
Laurent Laborde schrieb am 31.03.2010 um 13:52:52 (+0200):
I don't remember the exact english name but...
are you, in fact, planning some kind of stored function (like PLSQL in
postgresql) ?
(exemple of stored function : BEFORE INSERT ON something FOR EACH
ROW EXECUTE someFunction() )
I
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
BabuDb has a
db.prefixLookup( key|value| )
method so that's the one I'm using.
I wonder how well that scales. I'd like to see some performance figures from
indexing massive volumes and then doing lookup
Hi Peter,
I've tried to run your test case on my forked version.
First of all, I got a Framework exception when running the test case out of the
box :
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG wrap_mvn_org.apache.lucene_lucene-core_3.1.0
- BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
version.
First of all, I got a Framework exception when running the test case out of
the box :
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
wrap_mvn_org.apache.lucene_lucene-core_3.1.0 - BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.neo4j.lucene-index - FrameworkEvent
ERROR
As you say, a meta model validator is something that would sit nicely on top
of the event framework. And the plans for such a component is to not work on
it before the event framework is in place. Regarding the timeline for the
event framework it looks like we could have a first version
a service of class IndexProvider whereas
db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.osgi.OSGiExtensionLoader - Bundle
org.neo4j.lucene-index: Service org.neo4j.graphdb.index.IndexProvider
registered with implementation
the
IndexProvider registered as OSGi service (see first line of dump). Now an
exception comes later when registering the index. I guess this come from the
fact that you register a service of class IndexProvider whereas
db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO
the IndexProvider registered as OSGi service (see first line of dump). Now
an exception comes later when registering the index. I guess this come from
the fact that you register a service of class IndexProvider whereas
db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
[Framework Event
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will thereafter
wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService
Persson
matt...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW.: I wrote a new IndexService using BabuDB [1]. BabuDB is really fast,
but does not work for fulltext query. For now the IndexService is embedded
in the Object-graph mapper i wrote [2]. Anyone is free to check it out,
Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
others? One could have relationship types for each letter. Then a
search for the word faster, would involve six
Node.getRelationShip(RelationshipType,Direction)
2010/12/14 Andreas Ronge andreas.ro...@gmail.com
Hi
I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger
Hi Jose,
Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
TransactionEventHandler [2] includes operations for intercepting a transaction
before it is committed.
Otherwise, to intercept the Node.delete call itself, you'd have to look into
using AOP.
Cheers,
Andreas
[1] http
El 5/24/2011 9:12 AM, Andreas Kollegger escribió:
Hi Jose,
Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
TransactionEventHandler [2] includes operations for intercepting a
transaction before it is committed.
Otherwise, to intercept the Node.delete call itself, you'd have
. If you look in the
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package of the Neo4j kernel component there is
the current code for it. It is highly volatile and likely only work with the
current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework is
planned for the release after that (1.1).
Since the proper
receives any data, the
TransactionData argument is always null..
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mattias Persson
matt...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After
event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will thereafter recieve
diffs of modifications made in each transaction
Sorry, found the bug in my code.
It's rather difficult to debug when using the neo4j event framework
since the stack trace doesn't give you much clues of what went wrong.
It may be something that has occurred earlier that causes the problem,
like calling methods on a deleted node.
Cheers
Andreas
volatile and likely only work with the
current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework is
planned for the release after that (1.1).
Since the proper event API isn't done yet, it is still possible to come with
suggestions to how you would want it to work. Do you want
No, its just an index/key-value store with no
transactional capabilities other than when no exception is being thrown, the
index is updated.
Any tx handling must be impemented on top.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Tobias Ivarsson
tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29,
2010/6/16 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com:
Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
others? One could have relationship types for each letter. Then a
search for the word faster, would involve six
yes
:)
atle
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mattias Persson
matt...@neotechnology.com wrote:
2010/6/16 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com:
Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
others? One could
Hey,
I'm also looking forward to a time where there's a good auto-indexer
(and maybe integrated with a meta model to describe what to index),
using the event framework.
Blueprints requires two indices be created on the construction of a new graph.
AutomaticIndexVertex
AutomaticIndexEdge
Regarding the performance:
I have tried to tweak Babudb, but could not get any more out of it
than you did. I guess when you put 5M entries at once, there is only
so much tweaking one can do. (At least for babudb). It seems odd
though, since babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger an action like setting
a property on another node.
That node
...@gmail.com
Hi
I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger an action like setting
a property on another node
/AspectJ
[3] http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/
On May 24, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Jose Angel Inda Herrera wrote:
El 5/24/2011 9:12 AM, Andreas Kollegger escribió:
Hi Jose,
Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
TransactionEventHandler [2] includes operations for intercepting
soon there.
I'm also looking forward to a time where there's a good auto-indexer
(and maybe integrated with a meta model to describe what to index),
using the event framework.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf
in
the
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package of the Neo4j kernel component there
is
the current code for it. It is highly volatile and likely only work with
the
current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework
is
planned for the release after that (1.1).
Since the proper
only work with
the
current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework
is
planned for the release after that (1.1).
Since the proper event API isn't done yet, it is still possible to come
with
suggestions to how you would want it to work. Do you want events to be
fired
at the
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package, but this seems to be referenced only once,
registering the event manager within the kernel config.
Do you have a timeline for the event framework? I know it is intended for
version 1.1, but working on a validator doesn't necessarily have to wait until
the final release of 1.1
I know, exception can get swallowed at some point in there. I'll try to make
that better in some way.
2010/9/20 Andreas Ronge andreas.ro...@jayway.se
Sorry, found the bug in my code.
It's rather difficult to debug when using the neo4j event framework
since the stack trace doesn't give you
/12/14 Andreas Ronge andreas.ro...@gmail.com
Hi
I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the
API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger
-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-service - BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.neo4j.neo4j-osgi-bundle -
BundleEvent STARTED
Opening database in embedded
Antonis,
Just committed some bug fixes in the event framework and hopefully
this also solves the problem you experienced when using Spring. Could
you please try the latest neo4j-kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT to see if it
works?
To answer your other question the handler is called in the same thread
and you
babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
features. We should contact the babudb guys and ask why we see the
results that we see.
Regarding keys:
Having one entry in the db for each value will give the fastest update
speed, but will be slower for a large number of nodes with the same
tried to tweak Babudb, but could not get any more out of it
than you did. I guess when you put 5M entries at once, there is only
so much tweaking one can do. (At least for babudb). It seems odd
though, since babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
features. We should contact the babudb
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
I tried performance of BabuDB recently. I'm not very used to key-value
stores, but I chose this layout of the keys/values:
key: key|value|id
value: id
I might be missing something here, but from my
Hi
That's interesting !
Would be cool to try to use the same API as neo4j.rb.
But I think only a small part of the neo4j.rb API would be possible to
implement using the REST API.
Example, the traversals (which is done in javascript) and
indexing/rules which uses the event framework would
Tim,
I don't know enough about disambiguation algos to point you in any
special direction, but implementation-wise you could hook into the
event framework, http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Event_framework, in
order to do e.g. graph matching queries upon any modifying transaction
changing database
to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will thereafter recieve
diffs of modifications made
/master/src/test/java/org/neo4j/examples/osgi/Neo4jActivator.java.
I now get
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
BuildByTinyBundlestinybundles7256886623461679180UID - FrameworkEvent ERROR
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Exception in
org.neo4j.examples.osgi.Neo4jActivator.start() of bundle
no way
you can get around having to manually let the IndexService know that
an indexed property has changed. In the future, we're going to enable
hooking an IndexService into the event framework and then
declaratively specify property keys that it should watch and reindex.
But for now, you're going
Hmm...it's trivial to implement just user-followers in a relational db
directly. Sounds like what they're mainly doing is just adding an easy
partitioning layer. But they just released partitioning as a separate
project, Gizzard:
http://engineering.twitter.com/2010/04/introducing-gizzard-framework
if it would not
be to store something in the graph, f.ex. a property on a node. What exactly
do you mean by that?
Thanks and best regards,
Georg
On 27.04.2010 10:15, Mattias Persson wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1
that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will thereafter recieve
diffs of modifications made in each
do you mean by that?
Thanks and best regards,
Georg
On 27.04.2010 10:15, Mattias Persson wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event
framework has been
by that?
Thanks and best regards,
Georg
On 27.04.2010 10:15, Mattias Persson wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event
framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from
[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling Avalon Logger API support.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-service
- BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event
]
: Enabling Avalon Logger API support.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-service
- BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG [bundle@6
[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling Avalon Logger API support.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-service
- BundleEvent
. If the lookup returns a node you will
know
that the value was not unique. If None is returned then there is no node
with that e-mail, and you can go ahead and add it.
We have been discussing exposing an event framework that could be used to
implement such a constraint system, or automatic indexing
, but if you remove the @Test before the first test case
the second one will run and succeed.
So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need more
time to investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed
index/update ElasticSearch
(unfortunately I don't know much about the event framework to say if
this would work or not though)
Bests,
:- alex
cheers
Paddy
2010/9/3 Alexandru Popescu ☀ the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
On Friday, September 3, 2010, rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com
ElasticSearch
(unfortunately I don't know much about the event framework to say if
this would work or not though)
Bests,
:- alex
cheers
Paddy
2010/9/3 Alexandru Popescu ☀ the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
On Friday, September 3, 2010, rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com
be cool to try to use the same API as neo4j.rb.
But I think only a small part of the neo4j.rb API would be possible to
implement using the REST API.
Example, the traversals (which is done in javascript) and
indexing/rules which uses the event framework would be impossible to
implement (?)
/Andreas
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create a base of data. After
that it makes reads and writes 1000
I think the lucene test is flawed since it never returns any results in
lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i
fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create a base of data. After
that it makes reads and writes 1000
is flawed since it never returns any results in
lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed
to work correctly, event if I don't know what's
wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need more time to
investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed.
Nicolas
Le 17 juil. 2011 à 22:06, Peter Neubauer a écrit :
Nicolas,
the best would be to be able to emulate
does contain the tinybundles jar?
Best regards,
James
2011/7/20 Peter Neubauer neubauer.pe...@gmail.com:
Yup,
have pulled and can see it. Thanks! Will ask the Toni for a way to
cleanly shut down the framework so we can get both tests working.
/peter
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Peter
remove the @Test before the first test case
the second one will run and succeed.
So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need more
time to investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed.
Nicolas
...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
That's interesting !
Would be cool to try to use the same API as neo4j.rb.
But I think only a small part of the neo4j.rb API would be possible to
implement using the REST API.
Example, the traversals (which is done in javascript) and
indexing/rules which uses the event
Avi,
we are in the process to get out a nicer base framework for
transactional index creation, and an index provider for redis.
Meanwhile, if you want, you could look into the BerkelyDB index that I
tried to cook together (no guarantees there),
https://github.com/peterneubauer/bdb-index and see
in
lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage
returns any results
in
lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange atle.pra...@gmail.com
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create a base of data. After
that it makes
do not see that as
avoidable.
I think (or hope) that for automatic indexes, the criteria for how a node
qualifies for indexing would be defined by the developer, hopefully with
code, so it can be very general and flexible. For example, I guess that
whenever a node is added to the graph, an event
to schema-creep
into the Neo4j kernel.
Having configurable event handlers that allow for automatic indexing, while
maintaining the possibility to manually maintain indices sounds like a
reasonable solution.
Over the last year I have dedicated many hours to create my own schema
driven CMS
repository does contain the tinybundles jar?
Best regards,
James
2011/7/20 Peter Neubauer neubauer.pe...@gmail.com:
Yup,
have pulled and can see it. Thanks! Will ask the Toni for a way to
cleanly shut down the framework so we can get both tests working.
/peter
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11
superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need more
time to investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed.
Nicolas
Le 17 juil. 2011 à 22:06, Peter Neubauer a écrit :
Nicolas,
the best would be to be able
case doesn't
close the database, but if you remove the @Test before the first test
case
the second one will run and succeed.
So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need
more
time to investigate
doesn't
close the database, but if you remove the @Test before the first
test case
the second one will run and succeed.
So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't
know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This
need more
time to investigate
,
James
2011/7/20 Peter Neubauer neubauer.pe...@gmail.com:
Yup,
have pulled and can see it. Thanks! Will ask the Toni for a way to
cleanly shut down the framework so we can get both tests working.
/peter
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Peter Neubauer
neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
the second one will run and succeed.
So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't
know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This
need more
time to investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed.
Nicolas
Le 17 juil. 2011 à 22:06, Peter
long, if you want
to
catch up read the thread The event framework has landed.
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create a base of data.
After
that it makes reads and writes 1000 entries a thousand times
Hi ,
Thanks Andreas Kollegger and Rick Bullotta,
i am using vaadin framework. but the issue is.how to build a tree using
nodes. becouse we are selecting nodes form different levels of the graph
based on some conditions . then i have to merge child node with if the
parent nodes are available
happens HERE.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Emil Dombagolla
em...@hsenidoutsourcing.com wrote:
Hi ,
Thanks Andreas Kollegger and Rick Bullotta,
i am using vaadin framework. but the issue is.how to build a tree using
nodes. becouse we are selecting nodes form different levels of the graph
,
Thanks Andreas Kollegger and Rick Bullotta,
i am using vaadin framework. but the issue is.how to build a tree using
nodes. becouse we are selecting nodes form different levels of the graph
based on some conditions . then i have to merge child node with if the
parent nodes are available
\classes
Thu Aug 11 12:05:17 PDT 2011: Class Path:
C:\Users\Michael\blueprints-graph-cytoscapeMaster\target\test-classes;C:\Users\Michael\blueprints-graph-cytoscapeMaster\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\workspace\api-parent\model-api\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\.m2\repository\org\cytoscape\event
between index-util and the Neo4j
kernel in the future, at least by bundling them up together in a
convenience assembly (see above) and by using an event framework for
keeping indexes in sync with the node space.
Again it might be just to do with the name but I would not expect to
have
program, say
make it networking chat program or something that would create a 3D object;
the tooling should be able to say interpret the graph and create what it
says, I guess in a way it would be like an accessibility framework whatever
this means heh, like 1-to-1 mapping between java code and graph
\target\test-classes;C:\Users\Michael\blueprints-graph-cytoscapeMaster\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\workspace\api-parent\model-api\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\.m2\repository\org\cytoscape\event-api\3.0.0-alpha6-SNAPSHOT\event-api-3.0.0-alpha6-SNAPSHOT.jar;C:\Users\Michael\.m2\repository\org
PDT 2011: Class Path:
C:\Users\Michael\blueprints-graph-cytoscapeMaster\target\test-classes;C:\Users\Michael\blueprints-graph-cytoscapeMaster\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\workspace\api-parent\model-api\target\classes;C:\Users\Michael\.m2\repository\org\cytoscape\event-api\3.0.0-alpha6-SNAPSHOT
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
