Fellow developers!
The time has come to start the work on an event framework for Neo4j. In
order to do a good work at this we would get input on what requirements you
have on an event framework. We would like to get a list of use cases for
which you would use an event framework, along with the
Hi,
having an event mechanism in Neo4j is definitly a good idea. Just two
quick thoughts on that:
* consider integration into Spring's event stuff:
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#context-functionality-events
* using the proa
On 6/28/07, Johan Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From the neo4j.org website:
> """
> ...
> Neo provides:
> ...
>
>- an event framework with proactive and reactive events on
Hi,
I agree that being able to integrate with Spring's event system would be
highly useful. Although I think I would settle at "being able to integrate",
I would not like the event framework to introduce a dependency on Spring.
But I agree, it is very useful when you are using Ne
On 6/28/07, Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the neo4j.org website:
"""
...
Neo provides:
...
- an event framework with proactive and reactive events on
modification of the node space.
Actually, we haven't exposed the event framework yet in
Hi, Tobias.
That's awesome news.
A few general questions regarding an event framework for Neo4J...
- In the current implementation, there's a thread affinity for transactions.
I am guessing that this could create big challenges for "proactive" handlers
that are poten
Make it all async with an external api and it will work nicely with node.js.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Rick Bullotta <
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, Tobias.
>
> That's awesome news.
>
> A few general questions regarding an event framework
nts for an event framework for Neo4j
From: Dennis Peterson
Date: Fri, April 02, 2010 9:34 am
To: Neo user discussions
Make it all async with an external api and it will work nicely with
node.js.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Rick Bullotta <
rick.bullo...@burningsk
gt; Subject: [Neo] Requirements for an event framework for Neo4j
>
> Fellow developers!
>
> The time has come to start the work on an event framework for Neo4j. In
> order to do a good work at this we would get input on what requirements you
> have on an event framework. We would like to get
me an event with a reference to this change
> log, would seem the nicest solution.
>
> Kind regards,
> Niels Hoogeveen
>
> > From: tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com
> > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:39:25 +0200
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: [Neo] Re
#22: Update and publish the Event framework
-+--
Reporter: tobias | Owner: johans
Type: enhancement request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: neo-1.0
as.ivars...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:43:24 +0200
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo] Requirements for an event framework for Neo4j
>
> Yes. I can tick of one of the use cases on my list of expected ones.
>
> I would like some more input on this
o4j.org
> > Subject: Re: [Neo] Requirements for an event framework for Neo4j
> >
> > Yes. I can tick of one of the use cases on my list of expected ones.
> >
> > I would like some more input on this though. I'm assuming that you would
> > want proactive eve
e an event with a reference to this change log,
> would seem the nicest solution.
>
> Kind regards,
> Niels Hoogeveen
>
>> From: tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com
>> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:39:25 +0200
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Subject: [Neo] Requirements
whereas
db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.osgi.OSGiExtensionLoader - Bundle org.neo4j.lucene-index:
Service org.neo4j.graphdb.index.IndexProvider registered with implementation
org.neo4j.graphdb.index.IndexProvider[lucene
registered as OSGi service (see first line of dump). Now an
> exception comes later when registering the index. I guess this come from the
> fact that you register a service of class IndexProvider whereas
> db.index().forNodes() returns an instance o
#5: Expose event framework in API
-+--
Reporter: emil | Owner: emil
Type: enhancement request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo
service (see first line of dump). Now
> an exception comes later when registering the index. I guess this come from
> the fact that you register a service of class IndexProvider whereas
> db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
> >
> > [Framework Event
r when registering the index. I guess this come from the
>> fact that you register a service of class IndexProvider whereas
>> db.index().forNodes() returns an instance of Index.
>>
>> [Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO
>> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.osgi.OSGiExtensionLoader - B
as Jouanin
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> As shown below, exporting the implementation package is enough to make the
>>> IndexProvider registered as OSGi service (see first line of dump). Now an
>>> exception comes later when registering the index. I
oughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Nicolas Jouanin
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Peter,
> >>>
> >>> As shown below,
lotta <
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, Tobias.
>
> That's awesome news.
>
> A few general questions regarding an event framework for Neo4J...
>
> - In the current implementation, there's a thread affinity for
> transactions.
> I am guessing that
Hi Peter,
I've tried to run your test case on my forked version.
First of all, I got a Framework exception when running the test case out of the
box :
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG wrap_mvn_org.apache.lucene_lucene-core_3.1.0
- BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher]
rsion.
> First of all, I got a Framework exception when running the test case out of
> the box :
> [Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
> wrap_mvn_org.apache.lucene_lucene-core_3.1.0 - BundleEvent STARTED
> [Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.neo4j
#5: Expose event framework in API
-+--
Reporter: emil |Owner: emil
Type: enhancement request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0
Component
Based on the feedback we have received here we have created a draft of an
API for an event framework.
The semantics of the system that we have outlined are:
* There are two kinds of events - Database Lifecycle Events and Transaction
Events
* The interesting Lifecycle events are:
- "b
#22: Update and publish the Event framework
-+--
Reporter: tobias |Owner: johans
Type: enhancement request | Status: closed
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0
#5: Expose event framework in API
-+--
Reporter: emil |Owner: emil
Type: enhancement request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0-rc1
No, we are not planning to build a component for stored procedures. The
event framework could be used to build such a system though. That is: we are
not building a system for stored procedures, but we are planning a framework
that could be used to build it.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at
From the neo4j.org website:
"""
...
Neo provides:
...
- an event framework with proactive and reactive events on
modification of the node space.
- a validator framework for expressing data integrity constraints.
...
"""
These frameworks could be quite intere
Event support is a great idea.
Just in case people aren't aware of it, I've used the event bus project
http://www.eventbus.org/
with great success in that past, for in VM events. Maybe something to avoid
reinventing the wheel.
Jonny
___
N
As you say, a meta model validator is something that would sit nicely on top
of the event framework. And the plans for such a component is to not work on
it before the event framework is in place. Regarding the timeline for the
event framework it looks like we could have a first version in the
Hi everyone!
I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the framework
got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
*TransactionEventHandler*
can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will
I am using the event framework to auto-index nodes based on a special name i
give the properties: Whenever i want a property to be indexed, i append
:index= to the property-name. On afterCommit() i check all changed
properties, and re-index the values that have changed. Really simple and
smooth
Really nice, but it seems that afterCommit() never receives any data, the
TransactionData argument is always null..
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mattias Persson wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
> committed in ke
gt; > wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
> > committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
> > framework
> > got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
> >
son <
> matt...@neotechnology.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framework has been
> > committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the
> > framework
> > got quite small a
r receives any data, the
> > TransactionData argument is always null..
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mattias Persson <
> > matt...@neotechnology.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone!
> > >
> > > I'm quite pleased to announce tha
r API support.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-service - BundleEvent STARTED
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.neo4j.neo4j-osgi-bundle -
BundleEv
I don't remember the exact english name but...
are you, in fact, planning some kind of stored function (like PLSQL in
postgresql) ?
(exemple of "stored function" : BEFORE INSERT ON something FOR EACH
ROW EXECUTE someFunction() )
--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.
Hi
I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
Here is an example where I need this method:
I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
When a node/relationship changes it can trigger an action like setting
a property on another
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Mattias Persson wrote:
>
> BabuDb has a
>
> db.prefixLookup( "key|value|" )
>
> method so that's the one I'm using.
>
I wonder how well that scales. I'd like to see some performance figures from
indexing massive volumes and then doing lookup based on prefixLoo
Hi Jose,
Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
TransactionEventHandler [2] includes operations for intercepting a transaction
before it is committed.
Otherwise, to intercept the Node.delete call itself, you'd have to look into
using AOP.
Cheers,
Andreas
[1]
2010/12/14 Andreas Ronge
> Hi
>
> I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
>
> Here is an example where I need this method:
> I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
> When a node/relationship change
Laurent Laborde schrieb am 31.03.2010 um 13:52:52 (+0200):
> I don't remember the exact english name but...
> are you, in fact, planning some kind of stored function (like PLSQL in
> postgresql) ?
>
> (exemple of "stored function" : BEFORE INSERT ON something FOR EACH
> ROW EXECUTE someFunction()
ased to announce that the new event framework has been
> committed in kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT. After feedback from you guys the framework
> got quite small and cosy. Here's a summary.
>
> *TransactionEventHandler*
> can be registered at a GraphDatabaseService and will thereaf
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Atle Prange wrote:
>
> BTW.: I wrote a new IndexService using BabuDB [1]. BabuDB is really fast,
> but does not work for fulltext query. For now the IndexService is embedded
> in the Object-graph mapper i wrote [2]. Anyone is free to check it out, if
> it looks int
El 5/24/2011 9:12 AM, Andreas Kollegger escribió:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
> TransactionEventHandler [2] includes operations for intercepting a
> transaction before it is committed.
>
> Otherwise, to intercept the Node.dele
d. If you look in the
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package of the Neo4j kernel component there is
the current code for it. It is highly volatile and likely only work with the
current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework is
planned for the release after that (1.1).
Since the p
Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
others? One could have relationship types for each letter. Then a
search for the word "faster", would involve six
Node.getRelationShip(RelationshipType,Direction) c
Regarding the performance:
I have tried to tweak Babudb, but could not get any more out of it
than you did. I guess when you put 5M entries at once, there is only
so much tweaking one can do. (At least for babudb). It seems odd
though, since babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
Sorry, found the bug in my code.
It's rather difficult to debug when using the neo4j event framework
since the stack trace doesn't give you much clues of what went wrong.
It may be something that has occurred earlier that causes the problem,
like calling methods on a deleted node.
Chee
. It is highly volatile and likely only work with the
> current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework is
> planned for the release after that (1.1).
>
> Since the proper event API isn't done yet, it is still possible to come with
> suggestions to ho
ill struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
>>
>> Here is an example where I need this method:
>> I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
>> When a node/relationship changes it can trigger an action like setting
>> a pr
2010/6/16 Atle Prange :
> Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
>
> How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
> others? One could have relationship types for each letter. Then a
> search for the word "faster", would involve six
> Node.getRelatio
lso looking forward to a time where there's a good auto-indexer
(and maybe integrated with a meta model to describe what to index),
using the event framework.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
> Behalf Of Matti
oked up though, and it is of course undocumented. If you look in
the
>> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package of the Neo4j kernel component there
is
>> the current code for it. It is highly volatile and likely only work with
the
>> current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release, since a public event framework
is
&g
I know, exception can get swallowed at some point in there. I'll try to make
that better in some way.
2010/9/20 Andreas Ronge
> Sorry, found the bug in my code.
> It's rather difficult to debug when using the neo4j event framework
> since the stack trace doesn't give you
array[7-i] = (byte) (value >>> (i * 8));
}
return array;
}
private static long fastToLong( byte[] array ) throws IOException
{
long value = 0;
for ( int i = 0; i < array.length; i++ )
{
value <<= 8;
value
No, its just an index/key-value store with no
transactional capabilities other than when no exception is being thrown, the
index is updated.
Any tx handling must be impemented on top.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Tobias Ivarsson <
tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2
i
>>>
>>> I'm still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the API.
>>>
>>> Here is an example where I need this method:
>>> I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
>>> When a node/relationshi
e bug in my code.
> It's rather difficult to debug when using the neo4j event framework
> since the stack trace doesn't give you much clues of what went wrong.
> It may be something that has occurred earlier that causes the problem,
> like calling methods on a deleted node.
&
yes
:)
atle
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mattias Persson
wrote:
> 2010/6/16 Atle Prange :
>> Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index.
>>
>> How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the
>> others? One could have relationship types for each lette
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/AspectJ
[3] http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/
On May 24, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Jose Angel Inda Herrera wrote:
> El 5/24/2011 9:12 AM, Andreas Kollegger escribió:
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> Perhaps the event framework[1] would suit your purpose. The
>> Tran
still struggling with not having a Node.isDeleted() method in the
> API.
> >>>
> >>> Here is an example where I need this method:
> >>> I'm using the event framework to implemented a simple rule system.
> >>> When a node/relationship changes it
al collection to
>> hold the deleted entities a HashSet for fast lookups.
>>
>> 2010/12/15 Mattias Persson
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/12/14 Andreas Ronge
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I'm still struggling with not hav
e babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
> features. We should contact the babudb guys and ask why we see the
> results that we see.
>
> Regarding keys:
>
> Having one entry in the db for each value will give the fastest update
> speed, but will be slower for a larg
Hey,
> I'm also looking forward to a time where there's a good auto-indexer
> (and maybe integrated with a meta model to describe what to index),
> using the event framework.
Blueprints requires two indices be created on the construction of a new graph.
AutomaticI
t the
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package, but this seems to be referenced only once,
registering the event manager within the kernel config.
Do you have a timeline for the event framework? I know it is intended for
version 1.1, but working on a validator doesn't necessarily have to wait until
the final rele
hSet for fast lookups.
>> >
>> > 2010/12/15 Mattias Persson
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2010/12/14 Andreas Ronge
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm still struggling with not having a Nod
/master/src/test/java/org/neo4j/examples/osgi/Neo4jActivator.java.
I now get
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG
BuildByTinyBundlestinybundles7256886623461679180UID - FrameworkEvent ERROR
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Exception in
org.neo4j.examples.osgi.Neo4jActivator.start() of bundle
hing in the graph, f.ex. a property on a node. What exactly
do you mean by that?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Georg
>
>
> On 27.04.2010 10:15, Mattias Persson wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I'm quite pleased to announce that the new event framewo
Hi
That's interesting !
Would be cool to try to use the same API as neo4j.rb.
But I think only a small part of the neo4j.rb API would be possible to
implement using the REST API.
Example, the traversals (which is done in javascript) and
indexing/rules which uses the event framework wou
upport.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling Avalon Logger API support.
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
: Enabling JULI Logger API support.
[Framework Event Dispatcher] DEBUG org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-log
support.
>
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
> : Enabling Jakarta Commons Logging API support.
>
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-api[org.ops4j.pax.logging.internal.Activator]
> : Enabling Log4J API support.
>
org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-l
-logging-service-1.6.2.jar
> > [main] INFO org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.internal.AetherBasedResolver - Resolved
> > (org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jta_1.1_spec:jar:1.1) as
> D:\Software\De
> >
>
> elopment\SDKandLibrary\maven\repository\org\apache\geronimo\specs\geronimo-j
db, but could not get any more out of it
>> than you did. I guess when you put 5M entries at once, there is only
>> so much tweaking one can do. (At least for babudb). It seems odd
>> though, since babudb is a less complicated framework, with less
>> features. We should c
, and it is of course undocumented. If you look in
> the
>>> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.event package of the Neo4j kernel component there
> is
>>> the current code for it. It is highly volatile and likely only work with
> the
>>> current (1.0-rc) and next (1.0) release,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mattias Persson wrote:
> I tried performance of BabuDB recently. I'm not very used to key-value
> stores, but I chose this layout of the keys/values:
>
> key: key|value|id
> value: id
>
I might be missing something here, but from my interpretation, what you
but that just seems wrong. How can I do this
>> right?
>>
> I don't know what you mean by "pass data to the transaction" if it would not
> be to store something in the graph, f.ex. a property on a node. What exactly
> do you mean by that?
>
>>
>> Th
Antonis,
Just committed some bug fixes in the event framework and hopefully
this also solves the problem you experienced when using Spring. Could
you please try the latest neo4j-kernel 1.1-SNAPSHOT to see if it
works?
To answer your other question the handler is called in the same thread
and you
Tim,
I don't know enough about disambiguation algos to point you in any
special direction, but implementation-wise you could hook into the
event framework, http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Event_framework, in
order to do e.g. graph matching queries upon any modifying transaction
changing dat
Hi Emil,
guess this is because of OSGi classloading. What exactly needs to be
loaded to get the shell up?
/peter
1169 [Framework Event Dispatcher] INFO [undefined] - FrameworkEvent ERROR
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Exception in
com.waybuddies.server.database.internal.Activator.start
ail index. If the lookup returns a node you will know
that the value was not unique. If None is returned then there is no node
with that e-mail, and you can go ahead and add it.
We have been discussing exposing an event framework that could be used to
implement such a constraint system, or automatic i
2010/6/11 Tobias Ivarsson :
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mattias Persson > wrote:
>
>> I tried performance of BabuDB recently. I'm not very used to key-value
>> stores, but I chose this layout of the keys/values:
>>
>> key: key|value|id
>> value: id
>>
>
> I might be missing something he
Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
catch up read the thread "The event framework has landed".
Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
The tests first inserts 1M entries to create a base of data. After
that it makes reads and w
case)?
>>>
>>> I'd say it'd be better if the service classes could read the revision
>> from
>> the node which has the revision directly, that way you'd always get the
>> committed value. Maybe your handler could have a getRevision() method
>&g
om that revision node.
>
>
> 3. The caller should be able to pass data to the
> transaction, for now just
> the commit message. Of course I can temporarily store this
> in a node or
> attach it to the thr
2. How can I return the revision number from the
>>TransactionEventHandler so
>>
>>I can use it in the caller (my service classes in this case)?
>>
>>I'd say it'd be better if the service classes could read the
>>rev
I think the lucene test is flawed since it never returns any results in
lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
2010/6/22 Atle Prange
> Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
> catch up read the thread "The event framework has landed".
>
an
> > alternative thrid party authentication.
>
>
> There are no constraints of this sort in Neo core. Neither built into
> Neo4j.py. The easiest way to implement this is to use an index for that
> property. So each time where your code sets the e-mail property, it does
ucing-gizzard-framework-for.html
On that page they mention that FlockDb is built on top of Gizzard. I'm
having trouble figuring out just what FlockDb really adds.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Peter Neubauer <
peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Mmh,
> FlockDB seems to be fo
fast :)
>
> 2010/6/22 Atle Prange
>
>> Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
>> catch up read the thread "The event framework has landed".
>>
>> Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
>>
>> T
; 2010/6/22 Atle Prange
> >
> >> Started a new thread since the old got a bit long, if you want to
> >> catch up read the thread "The event framework has landed".
> >>
> >> Okay, i changed the tests to reflect a bit more realistic usage.
> &
23, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Mattias Persson
> > wrote:
> > > I think the lucene test is flawed since it never returns any results in
> > > lookup method. That's why it's so fast :)
> > >
> > > 2010/6/22 Atle Prange
> > >
> > >> Sta
esign_Guide
It seems weird to me that an attribute named "id" would be optional,
but anywho, I get your point. Unfortunately, there's currently no way
you can get around having to manually let the IndexService know that
an indexed property has changed. In the future, we're going to ena
st case doesn't
>> close the database, but if you remove the @Test before the first test case
>> the second one will run and succeed.
>> So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
>> what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix
as the IndexService
- use the Neo4j events framework for automatically index/update ElasticSearch
(unfortunately I don't know much about the event framework to say if
this would work or not though)
Bests,
:- alex
> cheers
> Paddy
>
>
>
> 2010/9/3 Alexandru Popescu ☀
>
e seems to work correctly, event if I don't know what's
wrong when doing it by hand on the felix framework. This need more time to
investigate.
Don't hesitate to pull code if needed.
Nicolas
Le 17 juil. 2011 à 22:06, Peter Neubauer a écrit :
> Nicolas,
> the best would be
cause in OSGiTest class the first test case doesn't
close the database, but if you remove the @Test before the first test case
the second one will run and succeed.
> So the neo4j superbundle seems to work correctly, event if I don't know
what's wrong when doing it by hand on the felix
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
