What does 1.3 bring to the party?
I know there will be with the composable request processor and
commons chain integration. What other innovations are there
in the new version?
I think they also said Struts 1.3 will also be built using JDK 1.4 and
to Servlet 2.3. So during evoltion, some th
At 9:29 PM -0700 7/15/05, Wendy Smoak wrote:
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd suggest that changes between releases should be immortalized on a
Release Notes page, like the very cool one we have for 1.2.7:
* http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html
Noted. ;) Joe, is it
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd suggest that changes between releases should be immortalized on a
Release Notes page, like the very cool one we have for 1.2.7:
* http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html
Noted. ;) Joe, is it okay to take the text of your email for the n
On 7/15/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing that can save some work is that the pseudo-database part of
> MailReader is already extracted out into its own module (it's in
> apps/dao in the source tree), which can be reused "as is" like it is
> in all the other MailReader var
On 7/15/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably the biggest other thing is the "extends" mechanism which
> allows most config elements to extend others, eliminating some
> redundancies in config files. To be honest, I haven't used this much
> yet, but I can see where it would be pre
At 4:39 PM +0100 7/15/05, Pilgrim, Peter wrote:
What does 1.3 bring to the party?
I know there will be with the composable request processor and
commons chain integration. What other innovations are there
in the new version?
Probably the biggest other thing is the "extends" mechanism which
al
On 7/15/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Must... not... volunteer... time... limited... :)
>
> Seriously, I would actually be quite interested in taking this on, but
> frankly I have not yet touched Shale at all, so I'm not certain I could
> pull it off... Certainly I couldn't gu
Must... not... volunteer... time... limited... :)
Seriously, I would actually be quite interested in taking this on, but
frankly I have not yet touched Shale at all, so I'm not certain I could
pull it off... Certainly I couldn't guarantee that I'd do everything the
*right* way :)
Tell you what th
On 7/15/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/15/05, Yaroslav Novytskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources.
> > I'm very interested of how Struts Dialogs work, and will appriciate any
> > links, example
On 7/15/05, Yaroslav Novytskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
> Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources.
> I'm very interested of how Struts Dialogs work, and will appriciate any
> links, examples, docs Is this the one that will be also used in Shale?
No, i
What does 1.3 bring to the party?
I know there will be with the composable request processor and
commons chain integration. What other innovations are there
in the new version?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
>
>
> On 7/14/05, Access Denied
James Mitchell wrote:
as soon as I get back, we will roll a release, or die trying ;)
that would be greeat.
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rvices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: Releasing 1.3 [was: Re: Struts 1.2 v
Hello!
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
(imitating Donkey) Me, me, pick me! ;-)
I am currently in the process of rewriting Mail Reader with Struts
Dialogs. You would not believe how nicer it gets ;)
Can you please provide a link to (or share if they are not jet) sources.
I'm very interested of how
.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx
- Original Message - From: "netsql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By "
(imitating Donkey) Me, me, pick me! ;-)
I am currently in the process of rewriting Mail Reader with Struts
Dialogs. You would not believe how nicer it gets ;)
Michael.
On 7/14/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is high time we get something out there for 1.3, even if it n
om: "netsql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By "volunteer", are you referring
only to current Struts committers?
Anyone can edit / search bug
omiters get tired of comiting your code)
.V
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 14, 2005 6:57 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3
On 7/14/05, Access Denied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just bought and am reading
Ted, is there a list of tasks for 1.3? By "volunteer", are you referring only
to current Struts committers?
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 14, 2005 6:57 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 v 1.3
On 7/14/0
On 7/14/05, Access Denied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book, "Struts: The Complete
> Reference" (Osborne 2004), which covers 1.2. I just learned from one
> of Ted Husted's posts that 1.3 is almost ready to be released. Am I
> wasting my time and should b
At 6:21 AM -0700 7/14/05, Wendy Smoak wrote:
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No. Most of the major changes in 1.3 are 'behind the scenes' and
will not affect the way you configure and use the framework.
That didn't come out quite right. I meant that the changes in 1.3
don't *have*
Maven is for building projects, like Ant does.
Access Denied escribió:
I've seen Maven listed amongst the Apache projects and read a little.
Is it supposed to replace CVS and SVN? Is this something we should be
using routinely?
tia,
buddy
---
I've seen Maven listed amongst the Apache projects and read a little.
Is it supposed to replace CVS and SVN? Is this something we should be
using routinely?
tia,
buddy
On 7/14/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Access Denied" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I just bought and am reading
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No. Most of the major changes in 1.3 are 'behind the scenes' and will not
affect the way you configure and use the framework.
That didn't come out quite right. I meant that the changes in 1.3 don't
*have* to affect the way you configure and use the fr
From: "Access Denied" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book, "Struts: The Complete
Reference" (Osborne 2004), which covers 1.2. I just learned from one
of Ted Husted's posts that 1.3 is almost ready to be released. Am I
wasting my time and should be studying other
Alls,
I just bought and am reading James Holmes' book, "Struts: The Complete
Reference" (Osborne 2004), which covers 1.2. I just learned from one
of Ted Husted's posts that 1.3 is almost ready to be released. Am I
wasting my time and should be studying other literature?
tia,
buddy
26 matches
Mail list logo
