Re: Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777

2018-07-27 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacopo, Suraj, Ashish  and Paul, Because there is no answer, I suppose it's a Vika's oversight? Else (even w/o answers) I'll digg it... Thanks Jacques Le 09/03/2018 à 01:56, Vikas Mayur a écrit : Is there anyone who could please confirm if this is bug and a ticket need to be opened? Sorry

Re: Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777

2018-03-08 Thread Vikas Mayur
Is there anyone who could please confirm if this is bug and a ticket need to be opened? Sorry for any oversight on my side. Regards Vikas On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote: > Hi, > > I see this commit was done to fix the inconsistencies with the weight > column on the product. T

Re: Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777

2018-03-06 Thread Vikas Mayur
Hi Paul, Thanks for you reply. At least in the r1720900 (and overall OFBiz) appears to be using the product_weight other than the recalculate shipping total service where it use shipping_weight. I would be interested to know why we use product_weight in one place and shipping_weight in other. Is

Re: Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777

2018-03-06 Thread Paul Foxworthy
Hi Vikas, Does shipping_weight factor in typical packaging for shipping? So you'd use shipping weight to calculate shipping costs, but product_weight for product specification. You might order quantity twelve 420g cans of soup. 420g is the net weight of the product, but for shipping you need to fa

Shippable Weight - r1720900 - OFBIZ-6777

2018-03-06 Thread Vikas Mayur
Hi, I see this commit was done to fix the inconsistencies with the weight column on the product. The product_weight is now used instead so if I am not wrong migrating to OFBiz 16 from OFBiz 12 would require me to copy the weight column to product_weight column and everything should magically happe