On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:23 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried deploying the services with the other example which uses the
> flowcontrollerand the services starts but with these errors:
>
> Deployment xml:
>
>
>
>
>
>brokerURL="tcp://localhost:**61616" prefetch="0"/
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:22 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 07:30 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Component Descriptor Editor
>>
> Hi,
>
> It is not a flow controller its an aggregate descriptor which is using the
> flow controller I just put it into flow
What client program are you using to drive the uima-as service? Anything
using sendAndReceiveCAS will only send one at a time.
Please use the runRemoteAsyncAE.sh program and specify the number of
outstanding CASes with -p. With no specification the number is 2.
Eddie
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:3
Scaling via async=false and the number of instances = 6 DOES speed the
> pipeline up by 6x, so I think the client is working correctly. It seems to
> just be an issue when the async=true. I checked in the JMX console with
> async=true and slow annotator = 6 instances and inside JMX UIMA reports
>
Is this a solid error that is easily reproduced?
The error is occurring when UIMA-AS is returning the CAS from the service.
You could add XMI serialization to file at the end of AE processing, for
the good and failing cases. If so lucky to have that serialization fail
too, could try inserting the
nt descriptor
> "Run as AS aggregate"?
>
> I found an email from a year ago online where Eddie Epstein wrote:
> "UIMA-AS will put every asynchronous component in a separate thread.Using
> the ComponentDescriptorEditor on a UIMA-AS deployment
> descriptor, marking an
a rules for modifying the annotations in my CAS. In
> both cases, serialization to file succeeded, with the second file
> containing the expected results of rule application.
>
> Unfortunately, the UIMA-AS serialization still produces the error in my
> original mail.
>
> Pr
10:21 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
> Can you share the before and after XmiCas files for a case where UIMA-AS
> service serialization failed? No confidential info please!
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Prokopis Prokopidis wrote:
>
>> No, this is
annotations.
Eddie
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 28.10.2013 13:47, Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > Assuming you would rather not share the CAS files, what I'd be looking
> for
> > is the xmi:id values changing between the before and after files. There
>
t; previously existing annotations.
>
> Are there any known modifications that cause problems?
>
> Peter
>
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Peter Klügl >wrote:
> >
> >> On 28.10.2013 13
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Neal R Lewis wrote:
> I have modeled a CasReader and CasMultiplier based on the RawTextExample
> in the duccbook, and have successfully ran the CR and CM in eclipse with a
> minimal wrapper.
Did you debug the job using one of the --all_in_one varieties, or some
ng Listener on Endpoint:
> queue://ducc.jd.queue.91 Selector: Command=2000 OR Command=2002 Broker:
> tcp://greenfairy:61617?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&closeAsync=false
> 03:53:45.290 - 1:
>
> org.apache.uima.adapter.jms.activemq.SpringContainerDeployer.doStartListeners:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Neal R Lewis wrote:
> Let's assume a pipeline like that in the Sample that contains a CR as the
> Job Driver, and the JP contains a CM, AE, and CC.
>
> If I understand correctly, the CR's getNext() returns a single Workitem
> CAS - a CAS tagged with the Workitem
Just in case you haven't considered it, version 2.4.2 has a new option for
overriding configuration parameters outside of component descriptions,
called external overrides. It is implemented via an additional settings
file. Component descriptors remain static, like code, which would work well
for P
On 05/12/13 10:04, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> I agree that it might make more sense to model our needs more directly
>> instead of trying to squeeze it into the schema we normally use for text
>> processing. But at the same time I would of course like to avoid having
>> to reimplement many of the thi
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Thomas Ginter wrote:
> It is likely then that your expansion is happening after the remote
> service is called or else is not yet big enough to be over the 100MB limit.
>
Also note that by default UIMA-AS [Java] services use a delta-CAS
interface. Only changes to
The Pear installer is part of the standard UIMA SDK, not currently included
in DUCC.
Definitely something that should be clarified in DUCC.
Thanks,
Eddie
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Bai Shen wrote:
> I've successfully set up DUCC in single user mode and run the example job
> through it.
You should not need UIMA-AS SDK installed.
Eddie
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Bai Shen wrote:
> So I need to install UIMA SDK in addition to DUCC? What about UIMA-AS?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Eddie Epstein
> wrote:
>
> > The Pear installer is p
pears and then deployed them. Then I
> was able to send a CAS to the queue and have it processed.
>
> I'm still trying to understand how all of the pieces interact and what all
> changes DUCC brings.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Eddie Epste
more machines and don't see how to use DUCC, please describe here.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Bai Shen wrote:
> Okay, I'll go ahead and redo my setup using UIMA-AS 2.4.2.
>
> How do I get DUCC to control my UIMA-AS setup?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:2
A pear is a packed UIMA analysis engine, or AE. UIMA-AS deploys services
that contain AEs. The command deployAsyncService requires a UIMA-AS
Deployment Descriptor.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Bai Shen wrote:
> I'm running the following command to deploy my pear to UIMA-AS 2.4.2.
>
> deplo
r,
> but I can't find any mention about deploying it.
>
> Is there a specific section that I should be looking at?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Eddie Epstein
> wrote:
>
> > A pear is a packed UIMA analysis engine, or AE. UIMA-AS dep
UIMA-C++ uses several libraries including APR, ICU and xercesc. Does OpenCV
drag in any of these at different version levels?
Eddie
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Peter Retzlaff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are working on a UIMA project with several C++-Analysis Engines
> (UIMA-AS 2.4 + UIMACPP 2.4
e same libs. As far as I can tell, this is not the case.
>
> Peter
>
> On 02/18/2014 02:22 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > UIMA-C++ uses several libraries including APR, ICU and xercesc. Does
> OpenCV
> > drag in any of these at different version levels?
> >
&g
Hi Mihaela,
The UimaAsynchronousEngine is designed to support multiple threads
accessing a service. The engine API object has a CAS pool size parameter
and initial CAS size parameters to support this.
>From the RunRemoteAsyncAE.java sample code:
// Add the Cas Pool Size and initial FS heap si
The job driver running the user's CR should not sent documents, only
references to documents, or preferably references to a set of documents.
Please see
http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1.0.0/duccbook.html#x1-1290008.2
Eddie
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:14 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi Reshu,
Attachments are not delivered to this mailing list.
Given that your application CR is following the guidelines,
please answer Lou's questions.
Eddie
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 01:39 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>>
A short discussion about Cas Consumers is at
http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1.0.0/duccbook.html#x1-138.3
Individual Work Items may be treated as collections. The Work Item CAS can
be used to trigger collection process complete for these collections. See
http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1
ly. It could be that the DUCC job driver is miss-handling this type
of exception.
Thanks,
Eddie
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:59 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 05:06 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Hi Reshu,
>>
>> Attachments are not delivered to this mailing lis
Are you using standard UIMA interface code to Solr? If so, which Cas
Consumer?
Taking at quick look at the source code for SolrCASConsumer, the batch and
collection process complete methods appear to do nothing.
Thanks,
Eddie
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:08 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/21/201
the paragraph "Flushing Cached Data".
Eddie
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 06:43 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Are you using standard UIMA interface code to Solr? If so, which Cas
>> Consumer?
>>
>> Tak
Would be nice to see the big picture, how the JMS services are integrated
into the full pipeline. Sounds like you have two, separate, "remote" JMS
annotators, which are being called from an aggregate on a "local" client.
And guessing that there is sofamapping on the aggregate, for the two remote
de
This sounds like what I described, C=aggregate, A and B are remote
delegates.
Anyway, unless sofamapping is used, B needs to use getView("SomeView").
commit) in
the process method after every 50 documents.
Regards
Eddie
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:35 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 11:34 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Hi Reshu,
>>
>> The collectionProcessingComplete() method in UIMA-AS has a limitation: a
>>
which are doing incremental commits.
The solution is to schedule the job in a non-preemptable class.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:22 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 01:28 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Hi Reshu,
>>
>> The Job model in DUCC is for the Collection Reader to send
There is a job specification parameter:
--process_per_item_time_max
Maximum elapsed time (in minutes) for processing one CAS.
Try setting that to something big enough.
Eddie
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:18 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 03:23 PM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
>
>>
Reshu,
Please look in the logfile of the job process. Maybe 10 minutes is still
not enough?
Eddie
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:42 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 05:36 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> There is a job specification parameter:
>> --process
Declaring a service dependency does not affect application code paths. The
job still needs to connect to the service in the normal way.
DUCC uses services dependency for several reasons: to automatically start
services when needed by a job; to not give resources to a job or service
for which a dep
Correct. Most DUCC daemons running on the head node are restartable. We
expect to complete this work so that in the case of head node failure a new
head node can automatically be started.
Currently DUCC can be configured such that no active user work is affected
if a head node goes down. However,
on
the head node are unaffected.
Eddie
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:26 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 04/01/2014 05:28 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Correct. Most DUCC daemons running on the head node are restartable. We
>> expect to complete this work so that in the case of h
the AE in a DUCC job would have such a delegate.
Eddie
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:00 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 04/01/2014 05:21 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> The
>> job still needs to connect to the service in the normal way.
>>
>> DUCC uses services depe
Reshu,
Can you zip up the logfile directory for one of these failing jobs and make
it available for download?
Eddie
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:24 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Reshu,
>>
>> Please look in the logfile of t
One approach is for the cas multiplier to put the question View in each
search CAS, using the CasCopier, and create a second view for search result
processing. Down stream annotators would then be multi-view, getting
question analysis results from one view and doing search analysis in the
other.
E
Hi Peter,
The logic is that since a sofa aware component may have one or
more input and/or output views, such a component needs to use
getView to specify which to use.
For sofa aware delegates, sofa mapping enables the delegate to
hard wire input and/or output View names in annotator code (or
ann
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Am 17.04.2014 15:01, schrieb Eddie Epstein:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > The logic is that since a sofa aware component may have one or
> > more input and/or output views, such a component needs to use
> > getView to
method. Is this a better
model for you?
Eddie
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Am 18.04.2014 15:23, schrieb Eddie Epstein:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Peter Klügl >wrote:
> >
> >> Am 17.04.2014 15:01, schrieb Eddie Epstein:
> >>
I think so too. Have created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3765to cover this work.
Eddie
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Am 22.04.2014 18:20, schrieb Peter Klügl:
> > Am 22.04.2014 18:10, schrieb Eddie Epstein:
> >> The current design
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> So my FixedParallelFlowController is a major simplification of that,
> the tradeoff is that the AEs run in parallel must be grouped in their
> own aggregate AE (again, very little overhead of that - though I'm
> not sure how it could affect e.
Hi Jeffery,
According the info at
http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.6.0/tutorials_and_users_guides.html#ugr.tug.aae.result_specification_setting
"The default Result Specification is taken from the Engine's output
Capability Specification."
So it should be possible to deploy the UIMA-AS service
Looking at a build on RHEL, jni.h was resolved with:
--with-jdk="/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/include
-I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/include/linux"
which follows the instructions in README.4src
I had built ICU [and all other dependencies] and installed it in a p
regards,
>
> Egbert
>
>
> Op dinsdag 22 juli 2014 09:30:41 schreef Eddie Epstein:
> > Looking at a build on RHEL, jni.h was resolved with:
> > --with-jdk="/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/include
> > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_
A CPE descriptor can override configuration parameters defined in any
integrated components.
Documentation a little bit below
http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.6.0/references.html#ugr.ref.xml.cpe_descriptor.descriptor.cas_processors.individual
3.6.1.2. Element
This element provides a way to overri
rily known at design time. However,
> UIMA isn’t passing it through to UimaContext presumably because it isn’t
> defined in the MyCollectionReader.xml.
>
> Hope that helps clear it up.
>
>
> On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:51, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > A CPE descriptor can override con
Hi Egbert,
The README file for UIMA-AS shows an application example with
Deploy_MeetingDetectorTAE.xml.Does that run OK for you?
Assuming yes, can you give more details about the scenario, perhaps the
explicit commands used? The descriptors used?
Eddie
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Egbert
full
> / relative path in the annotator descriptors instead of just a library
> name. Where should
> I report these feature requests?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Egbert
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:04:36 PM Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > Good to hear the build worked.
m Working Examples (or actually, not-working
> > examples) that I've constructed to pinpoint the problem.
> >
> > Commenting out line 62 (the call to setCollectionReader) 'fixes' the
> > problem. However, as you can see, the implementation o
When using deployAsyncService.sh to start a UIMA AS service, the default
Java heap size is Xmx800M. To override this, export an environment
parameter UIMA_JVM_OPTS with JVM arguments. For example:
$ export UIMA_JVM_OPTS="-Xmx6G -Xms2G"
$ deployAsyncService.sh myDeploymentDescriptor.xml
On
There is no mechanism for a uima-as client to modify the result
specification of a remote service. Since type/feature control cannot
indicate many other behavioral characteristics, like speed vs accuracy
tradeoffs, the suggested approach for dynamic control is to use dedicated
feature structures in
The $DUCC_RUNTIME tree needs to be on a shared filesystem accessible from
all machines.
For single user mode ducc_ling could be referenced from there as well.
But for multiuser setup, ducc_ling needs setuid and should be installed on
the root drive.
Eddie
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:08 AM, James B
> have successfully setup and ran my UIMA analysis engine on single user
> mode. I also followed DUCCBOOK to setup ducc_ling but I am sure how to get
> it worked on a cluster of machines.
>
> Thanks,
> Tam
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Eddie Epstein
> wrote:
t; Regards,
> Tam
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Eddie Epstein
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tam,
> >
> > In the install documentation,
> > http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1.0.0/installation.html,
> > the section "Multi-User Installation and Verific
ean 500 work items per machine?
>
> Regards,
> Tam
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a default limit of 500 work items dispatched at the same time.
> How
> > many dispatched are shown for the job?
> >
Simon,
The DUCC resource manager logs into rm.log. Did you look there for reasons
the resources are not being allocated?
Eddie
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Simon Hafner wrote:
> 4 shares total, 2 in use.
>
> 2014-11-12 5:06 GMT-06:00 Lou DeGenaro :
> > Try looking at your DUCC's web server
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Simon Hafner wrote:
> So to run effectively, I would need more memory, because the job wants
> two shares? ... Yes. With a larger node it works. What would be a
> reasonable memory size for a ducc node?
>
> Really depends on the application code. Quoting from the
DuccRawTextSpec.job specifies that each job process (JP)
run 8 analytic pipeline threads. So for this job with 100 work
items, no more than 13 JPs would ever be started.
After successful initialization of the first JP, DUCC begins scaling
up the number of JPs using doubling. During JP scale up the
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:05 AM, reshu.agarwal
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am bit confused. Why we need un-managed reservation? Suppose we give 5GB
> Memory size to this reservation. Can this RAM be consumed by any process if
> required?
>
Basically yes. See more info about "Rogue Process" in the duccb
The preferred approach is to run the analytics as a DUCC service, and have
an application driver that feeds the service instances with incoming data.
This service would be a scalable UIMA-AS service, which could have as
many instances as are needed to keep up with the load. The driver would
use the
Ooops, in this case the web server would be feeding the service directly.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
> The preferred approach is to run the analytics as a DUCC service, and have
> an application driver that feeds the service instances with incoming data.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 PM, D. Heinze wrote:
> Eddie... thanks. Yes, that sounds like I would not have the advantage of
> DUCC managing the UIMA pipeline.
>
Depends on the definition of "managing". DUCC manages the lifecycle of
analytic pipelines running as job processes and as services.
Those are the only two log files? Should be a ducc.log (probably with no
more info than on the console), and either one or both of the job driver
logfiles: jd.out.log and jobid-JD-jdnode-jdpid.log. If for some reason the
job driver failed to start, check the job driver agent log (the agent
managing
DuccCasCC component has presumably created
/home/ducc/analysis/txt.processed/5911.txt_0_processed.zip_temp and written
to it?
Did you run this sample job in something other than cluster mode?
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Simon Hafner
wrote:
> When running DUCC in cluster mode, I get "Re
-28 10:45 GMT-06:00 Eddie Epstein :
> > DuccCasCC component has presumably created
> > /home/ducc/analysis/txt.processed/5911.txt_0_processed.zip_temp and
> written
> > to it?
> I don't know, the _temp file doesn't exist anymore.
>
> > Did you run this s
on - the BaseCap -
> > so a max of 16 will be scheduled for it, subject to fair-share
> constraint.
> >
> > 17 Nov 2014 15:07:38,880 INFO RM.RmJob - */getPrjCap/* 208927 bobuser
> O 2
> > T 343171 NTh 128 TI 143171 TR 6748.601431980907 R 1.8967e-02 QR 5043 P
> 6509
>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Simon Hafner wrote:
> I've thrown some numbers at it (doubling each) and it's running at
> comfortable 125 procs. However, at about 6.1k of 6.5k items, the procs
> drop down to 30.
>
125 processes at 8 threads each = 1000 active pipelines. How CPU cores
are these
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Simon Hafner
wrote:
> 2014-11-30 7:25 GMT-06:00 Eddie Epstein :
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Simon Hafner
> wrote:
> >
> >> I've thrown some numbers at it (doubling each) and it's running at
> >> comfort
I think that is not supported directly. One could use the CasCopier to copy
the view(s) of interest to a new, empty CAS and serialize to xmi file from
that.
Eddie
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Jakob Sahlström
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm dealing with a CAS with multiple views, namely a Gold View and
Hi Reshu,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:26 AM, reshu.agarwal
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any problem if one Agent node is on Physical(Master) and one
> agent node is on virtual?
>
> I am running a job which is having avg processing timing of 20 min when I
> have configured a single machine DUCC (ph
Hi Silvestre,
An aggregate deployed with UIMA-AS can be used to run delegate annotators
in parallel, with a few restrictions.
- the aggregate must be deployed as async=true
- the parallel delegates must each be running in remote processes
- the delegates must not modify preexisting FS
As Jens
troy()
>>>> methods
>>>> in UIMA-AS are not called.
>>>> There should be some evidence in JP logs at the very end. Look for
>>>> something like this:
>>>>
>>>> Process Received a Message. Is Process target for message:tr
The CPE runs pipeline threads in parallel, not necessarily CAS processors.
In a CPE descriptor, generally all non-CasConsumer components make up the
pipeline.
Change the following line to indicate how many pipeline threads to run, and
make sure the casPoolSize is number of threads +2.
Eddie
On
Can you give more details on the overall pipeline deployment? The initial
description mentions a CPE and it mentions services. The CPE was created
before flow controllers or CasMutipliers existed and has no support of
them. Services could be Vinci services for the CPE or UIMA-AS services or
???
On
e me
> consider implementing a custom multithreaded collection processor but I
> wanted to avoid this.
>
> Hope this clarifies what I am trying to do. Cheers :)
>
> > On 24 Apr 2015, at 16:50 , Eddie Epstein wrote:
> >
> > Can you give more details on the overall pipel
UIMA-AS has example deployment descriptors using placeholders for the
broker: ${defaultBrokerURL}
If these placeholders are used and the user doesn't specify a value for the
Java property "defaultBrokerURL" then some code in UIMA-AS will use a
default value of tcp://localhost:61616. That is the onl
The simplest way of vertically scaling a Job process is to specify the
analysis pipeline using core UIMA descriptors and then using
--process_thread_count to specify how many copies of the pipeline to
deploy, each in a different thread. No use of UIMA-AS at all. Please check
out the "Raw Text Proce
process_dd. But
> How??
>
> Thanks in advanced.
>
> Reshu.
>
>
> On 05/01/2015 03:28 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> The simplest way of vertically scaling a Job process is to specify the
>> analysis pipeline using core UIMA descriptors and then using
>> --pro
Parallel-step currently only works with remote delegates. The other
approach, using CasMultipliers, allows an arbitrarily amount of parallel
processing in-process. A CM would create a separate CAS for each delegate
intended to run in parallel, and use a feature structure to hold a unique
identifier
eline instances in separate threads? UIMA-AS would do
this by specifying N instances of a synchronous top-level aggregate.
Eddie
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:56:33AM -0400, Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > Parallel-step curre
Hi Petr,
Good comments which will likely generate lots of responses.
For now please see comments on scaleout below.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> * UIMAfit is not part of core UIMA and UIMA-AS is not part of core
> UIMA. It seems to me that UIMA-AS is doing things
Hi Sergii,
The ducc_runtime tree needs to be installed on a shared filesystem
that all DUCC nodes have mounted in the same location. Just install
the ducc runtime once from the DUCC head node. All other DUCC
nodes simply need to have the mounted filesystem and common user
accounts with identical u
l the
> other
> nodes.
> Maybe it will save someone like me a couple of hours.
>
> Thanks again and cheers,
> Sergii
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Eddie Epstein
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sergii,
> >
> > The ducc_runtime tree needs to be installed on a
Hi Torsten,
The documentation says ...
public FinalStep(boolean aForceCasToBeDropped)
Creates a new FinalStep, and may indicate that a CAS should be dropped.
This can only be used for CASes that are produced internally to the
aggregate.
It is an error to attempt to drop a CAS that was p
not be dropped?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 06.09.2015, at 15:58, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > Hi Torsten,
> >
> > The documentation says ...
> >
> > public FinalStep(boolean aForceCasToBeDropped)
> >
> > Creates a new FinalStep, and may
Hi Petr
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently struggling to perform a complex flow transformation with
> UIMA. I have multiple (N) CASes with some fulltext search results.
> I chop these search results to sentences and would like to pick the top
> M sen
returned by processAndOutputNewCASes does not contain the input CAS?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 06.09.2015, at 16:21, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > FinalStep() in a CasMultiplier aggregate means to stop further flow
> > in
e do explicitly not want certain CASes to continue the processing path.
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 06.09.2015, at 17:04, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > In general the input CAS must continue down some processing path.
> > Where is it stored and what trigg
;t get why.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 06.09.2015, at 17:14, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
> > How about the filter adds a FeatureStructure indicating that the CAS
> should
> > be dropped.
> > Then when the INNER_AAE returns the CAS, the flow controller in the
>
ion with a special FeatureStructure, but
> this has the disadvantage that the consumer needs to be aware of that.
> It would be easier if some CASes could simply be dropped.
> I guess this could even be useful for flat workflows.
>
> -Torsten
>
>
> Am 06/09/15 17:31 schrie
Can the filter in the INNER_AAE modify such CASes, perhaps
by deleting data, that would result in the existing consumer
effectively ignoring them?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Zesch, Torsten
wrote:
> >The consumer does not have to be modified if the flow controller
> >drops CASes marked to b
Petr,
> > > (I'm somewhat tempted to cut my losses short (much too late) and
> > > abandon UIMA flow control altogether, using only simple pipelines and
> > > having custom glue code to connect these together, as it seems like
> > > getting the flow to work in interesting cases is a huge time s
the document text, but
> as far as I know the document text cannot be changed once it is set.
>
> Am 07/09/15 17:14 schrieb "Eddie Epstein" unter :
>
> >Can the filter in the INNER_AAE modify such CASes, perhaps
> >by deleting data, that would result in the existing
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
