Hi Jayanth,
The system VM public IP is not accessible from the KVM host machine and when I
am trying to open the console from the from GUI, it is not happening.
I created an internal network with VLAN and it is routed. The kvm and ms is
connected with its gateway and the ssvm also connected
Hello Bharath,
I don't know if this helps, but one of the other ways is to register the ISO
from the URL. You can also have a VM with a web server to host ISOs or use some
already accessible URL.
Not sure what you exactly mean by backend, but you should be able to upload
ISOs as long as your
+1
Performed the below operations, on Advanced Zone and KVM hosts.
- Register Template / ISO
- Create Isolated / Shared network
- Deploy VM (on Isolated / Shared network)
- Deploy VM with DATA disk
- Deploy VM using ISO
- VM stop / start / reboot / reinstall / live migrate / storage migration
Hi All,
Can we upload ISO from backend?
Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini
[signature_166628646]
From: Winkler Marc (ID)
Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 8:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unable to Upload ISO from local
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email
Hi Jimmy,
This feature is not available yet (others may confirm), could you open a
feature request?
-Jithin
From: Jimmy Huybrechts
Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 9:38 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Snapshot download
Hi,
While doing some last tests before production I
+1
Performed basic operations on Advanced zones and KVM hosts:
1. VM deployment on isolated networks
2. VM deployment on VPC
3. Creation of Firewall, port forward rules, LB rules
4. Migration of VM
5. Deployment of CKS cluster
Looks good to me.
Regards,
Pearl
Hi all,
+1 based on some upgrade and manual smoke testing.
Best wishes,
Vladi
From: Abhishek Kumar
Sent: 29 January 2024 08:58
To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: PMC
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.0.0
+1 (binding) based on a series of tests I've done with Advanced Zones
and VMWare.
On 2024-01-31 17:10, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
+1 (binding)
Repeated tests performed on previous RCs around Vmware to KVM migration
and KVM import/export
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Rohit Yadav
Date:
+1 (binding)
Repeated tests performed on previous RCs around Vmware to KVM migration and KVM
import/export
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2024 at 09:37
To: users , d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4
+1
Hi,
While doing some last tests before production I noticed there is no option to
download a vm snapshot (including memory if saved), now for some law
enforcement cases they will request such a snapshot with memory (after proper
warrants of course). How to download these in this case? Even if
Hi Wei
Thanks for the info, we decided to proxy the SSVM connections through a load
balancer and forward the requests on the SSL/TLS Port of the SSVM.
That works like a charm for our environment.
Cheers
Marc
ETH Zürich
Marc Winkler
ID IT Lehrlabor
HCP G38.2
Leopold-Ruzicka-Weg 4
8093 Zürich
What Kiran said, and in addition to that make sure you have the right
drivers in the VM templates (ie virtio_blk, virtio_net etc).
Virt-v2v might help here:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1353783
On 2024-01-31 12:17, Kiran Chavala wrote:
Hi Francisco
The xcp zone templates will in vhd
Hi Bharat and Marc,
I was able to reproduce the issue and verified that the PR fixes the issue (
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8264)
- Update global setting `use.https.to.upload` to `false`
- stop/start SSVM or recreate it
- upload template/iso from local
As mentioned before, it
Hi Wei and Marc,
The major issue is unable to upload ISO but when I open the console of system
vm’s, the console was not opening. I think the reason behind this is the VM
able to communicate to MS but MS can’t.
>From backend I able to login in the VM and ssvm.sh output also shared which is
Hi Francisco
The xcp zone templates will in vhd format. In order for them to work with KVM
zone they have to be in qcow2 format
You can try to use the qemu-img tool to convert them to qcow2 format
Regards
Kiran
From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada
Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 5:28 PM
To:
Good morning guys,
I have a doubt regarding a matter. If I copy all templates, such as Ubuntu
and Windows, from an XCP zone to a KVM zone, is it possible to make them
work? Or do I need to create new templates for the KVM zone?
Thank you in advance
Regards
--
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
Hi,
This is a known issue which has been resolved by
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8264
It will be included in the coming 4.19.0.0 release
-Wei
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:43, Bharat Bhushan Saini
wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>
>
> I encountered below error,
>
>
>
>POST
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for sharing the details.
I couldn't find any errors with saml in the log, below are the logs after
enabling saml. Not sure if that's saml config issue.
2024-01-29 16:57:10,499 INFO [o.a.c.s.SAML2AuthManagerImpl] (main:null)
(logid:) SAML auth plugin loaded
2024-01-29
Is the IP 10.1.10.11 the IP of the SSVM and can you reach https://10.1.10.11/
from your client device? From personal experience, if your SSVM is not
configure to use SSL/TLS, you will not be able to use the local upload feature.
This part of the documentation describes this:
Hi Marc,
I encountered below error,
POST https://10.1.10.11/upload/fe248acd-cadf-4709-bd12-bdb52e32a8dc
net::ERR_ADDRESS_UNREACHABLE
Cloudstack UI is SSL configured but SSVM is not (have to use myurl.example.com
or example.com).
Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini
[signature_845774157]
Hi Bharat
What kind of errors / messages do you have in the Console (F12 Key) of your
Browser? Do you connect through SSL to your Cloudstack Web UI and is the SSVM
configured to use TLS/SSL?
Cheers
Marc
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 11:27
To:
Hi All,
Please checkout the below logs as well,
root@s-6-VM:~# cat /var/log/cloud/cloud.out
2024-01-30 19:48:38,198 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Agent started
2024-01-30 19:48:38,218 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null)
Implementation Version is 4.18.1.0
2024-01-30
Hi all,
we are using 2 compute offerings, called offering1 and offering2. Both
offerings are "Custom constrained" with similar values for cpu and memory.
Both offerings are using the same disk offering.
The only difference is that offering1 used host tag "group1" and offering2
uses host tag
23 matches
Mail list logo
