on the
values set for system.vm.use.local.storage and Local storage enabled.
Of course, you need compute offering using local storage as well.
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17
compute offering that use local storage?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:20 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: More disk space for primary storage
enabled flag set to for the
Zone where the KVM hosts reside?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:08 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: More disk space for primary
Hi, All,
I found a weird situation here:
1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor
nodes.
2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server.
3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it.
4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true
and what is this /dev/vda?
Please refer blow link : I have used below link to resize my root
partition .
http://www.rootusers.com/how-to-increase-the-size-of-a-linux-lvm-by-adding-a-new-disk/
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 March 2015
Hi, All,
I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set disk
offering, the created new VM always has the same original size. For
Example, although I specified 100GB of hard disk,
the actual disk size remains ~20GB, which should come with the template
itself:
name = Large
id
of the developers might confirm...we had
discussion about weather CS will also resize partition and FS - which is I
guess not the case...
On 13 March 2015 at 16:36, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All,
I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set
disk
offering
Hi,
I found when I try to list details of the VM with name vm-1 by:
list virtualmachines name=vm-1
Cloudstack will also return me with info of another VM machine of vm-10, so
I got 2 VMs info here.
How to avoid this? Thanks.
Cheers,
Dan
are getting the result of vm-10 as
well.
You can try with UUID of the vm which gives you exact vm details you want,
http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesid=11b7032d-4c03-4fc0-a394-71d921c1e3ba
Thanks,
Harikrishna
On 04-Mar-2015, at 10:01 pm, Dan Dong dongda
volumes and not Data
Volumes
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 February 2015 20:14
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi,
I'm trying to configure VM login by SSH Key pair Authentication instead
of usrename/password on Ubuntu14.04. I'm following the document as:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/virtual_machines.html
The main part is under Creating an Instance Template that Supports SSH
Hi, All,
I found the primary storages are keep decreasing after I create and then
destroy VMs. Although the VMs are destroyed and expunged, their occupation
on primary storage seems never been released( even after weeks).
Is there a way to force releasing the disk space after a VM has been
it will list all possible options you have.
HTH
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 29 January, 2015 16:11:34
Subject: How to specify
Hi,
When I tried to deploy a new instance by cloudmonkey CLI for a customized
disk size, e.g 50GB,
how to specify the disk size?
deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=id-of-custom ...
Error 431: This disk offering requires a custom size specified
Cheers,
Dan
Hi, All,
Thanks for all the info, by recreating the template following the
document, now the newly created VMs have their IP addresses set
automatically, but the hostname still keeps the hostname of the VM from
which template is created. For CentOS, the hostname is set in the file
Hi,
When I tried to install cloudmonkey following:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI#CloudStackcloudmonkeyCLI-Usingasacommandlinetool
I found this error when running the command:
# cloudmonkey
Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module
Hi,
I found that when I create new instances from template of my own( a
centos OS), the IP address
and hostname are not set to the VM automatically, you have to login to the
VM from the UI and set them manually, then a restart will get them take
effect. Does anybody else observe the same issue?
Exactly, thanks Erik!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-01-22 12:46 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com:
If I recall correctly you'll solve that by upgrading the 'requests' python
package.
Erik
Den torsdag 22. januar 2015 skrev Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com følgende:
Hi,
When I tried
using afinity groups,
and provide MS log output...
On 2 December 2014 at 00:45, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All,
When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
by Unable
to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity
groups
Hi, All,
After create a few VMs on my KVM hosts, I found they could not see each
other although they are in the same subnet of 192.168.0.*. The route on
each of the VM is the same as:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
Hi, All,
When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
by Unable
to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity
groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them. But
each KVM host has 24 cores, 48GB RAM and 8TB of disk, the
,
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:00 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, Vadim,
Thanks for the hints. Yes, the route table looks weird, but this comes
from
routing
table is created dynamically.
Fix you network and I believe everything will work out-of-the box.
Regards,
Vadim.
From: Dan Dong [dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 17:45
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject
here otherwise we will
continue guessing.
It would be even better if you describe your network layout like on the
first picture here:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking_and_traffic.html
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda
in the setup guide? Does your hypervisor have access to
internet to be able to download template?
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: To let SSVM reach outside network
Hi, All,
I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL
of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The
SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could
not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same
security groups will allow VMs to get in touch,
if that's what you wish.
HTH
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2014 21
Hi, All,
I have a question on basic network configuration of cloudstack:
1. The Management Server--192.168.0.100
2. One KVM host-- 192.168.0.101
3. System VMs-- 192.168.0.110-192.168.0.120
3. The guest VMs--192.168.0.150-192.168.0.250
That is, they are all in the same network of 192.168.0.0/24,
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
~Rajani
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Some more info, on SSVM I can see the following routes, there is route
there, so why SSVM(eth2: 192.168.0.134) could
Hi, All,
When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
route table on SSVM:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2
and the outside.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-11 10:29 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com:
Hi, All,
When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
route table on SSVM:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 2:32 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Network setup questions.
Hi, all,
I have a simple network setup in my cloud as:
1. Management server have 2 NICs:
em2
Hi, All,
When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I logged
into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although they are
both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping outside
world. Here are my simple network settings of my cloud(1Management
192.168.0.25
2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com:
Hi, All,
When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I
logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although
they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping
Hi, all,
I have a simple network setup in my cloud as:
1. Management server have 2 NICs:
em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24
em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS
and Gateway of the cloud)
2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 3:16 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Hi, Jessica,
Yes, I used the single quote and get the value updated, but still could
Hi, Experts,
When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the
http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to
the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the
to use
near 'secstorage.allowed.internal.sites=192.168.0.0/24' at line 1
2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Experts,
When I modified the global settings for
secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Experts,
When I modified the global settings for
secstorage.allowed.internal.sites
to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the
http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back
to
the original
='secstorage.allowed.internal.sites';
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Thanks Erik, I found it, but when I
Hi,
When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone.
What does this mean and how to delete the Zone?
Cheers,
Dan
No, I will try to delete it. Thanks Motty.
2014-11-04 10:20 GMT-06:00 motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com:
Dan,
have you deleted any networks you created?
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error
Hi, All,
On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the Ready
status is No, and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
just could not see it in the My ISOs tab, do you know what's the possible
problem? Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso;.
2014-11-04 15:07 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com:
Hi, All,
On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the Ready
status is No, and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
just could not see it in the My ISOs tab, do you know what's
Hi, Experts,
After I installed cloudstack and openned the UI, why I could not see any
System VMs(0) under the Infrastructure tab? I could add
Zone-Pod-Cluster-Hosts. And the system VM has already been downloaded:
ll /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/
total 296048
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096
Yes, the zone is enabled. How to add a system VM?
2014-11-03 17:29 GMT-06:00 abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com:
Is the zone enabled? CS should create system vms once zone is enabled.
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:56 am, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Experts
vm (or console vm) probably it thinks it can not launch
thrm for some reason (you can destroy an ssvm but you cant launch it
yourself), cs management server log may have the clue about the problem...
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 3, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes
47 matches
Mail list logo
