Re: CloudStack India User Group 2025 – Event Details & Call for Speakers

All, Reminder - the CloudStack India User Group 2025 Meetup CFP closes in less than a week (16th June 2025). If you're interested in speaking, please submit your talk as soon as possible. For more details, please visit: https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/csiug-2025 Regards. ___

Re: Cloudstack Management + ProxySQL + MySQL (Galera) 8.0

Thanks for the sharing -Wei On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jürgen Gotteswinter wrote: > For the records, this is not related to acs. Setting the correct Mysql > version in ProxySQL helps: set mysql-server_version='8.0.40-31.1'; > > Am 15.05.25, 17:24 schrieb "Jürgen Gotteswinter" > juergen.

Re: Cloudstack Management + ProxySQL + MySQL (Galera) 8.0

For the records, this is not related to acs. Setting the correct Mysql version in ProxySQL helps: set mysql-server_version='8.0.40-31.1'; Am 15.05.25, 17:24 schrieb "Jürgen Gotteswinter" mailto:juergen.gotteswin...@mgm-tp.com.inva>LID>: Hello, I am trying to setup proxysql in front of our a

Re: Cloudstack cloud-init + Ubuntu 24.04 + XCP issue

ces Endla 16, Tallinn 10142 | www.wavecom.ee | www.facebook.com/wavecom.ee - Original Message - From: "Wei ZHOU" To: jo...@wavecom.ee.invalid Cc: "users" Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025 12:19:30 PM Subject: Re: Cloudstack cloud-init + Ubuntu 24.04 + XCP issue Hi, The Ubu

Re: Cloudstack cloud-init + Ubuntu 24.04 + XCP issue

Hi, The Ubuntu 24.04 cloud image worked fine in my testing. You may refer to the cloud-init.service and /etc/cloud configurations inside it Kind regards, Wei On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:10 AM Joann Mõndresku wrote: > Hello. > > We are in process of building templates to use in our CloudStack

RE: CloudStack Marketplace?

-party integration or similar to offer self-service functionality beyond the basics of what templates, etc. you can create in CloudStack itself. -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 12:32 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Marketplace

Re: CloudStack Marketplace?

. Regards. From: David Knuth Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 18:35 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Marketplace? Can those items be tied into/leverage Github actions/workflows? -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Re: CloudStack Marketplace?

sage- > > From: Bryan Tiang > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:19 PM > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: CloudStack Marketplace? > > > > EXTERNAL > > > > Hey David, > > > > Check our Stack

RE: CloudStack Marketplace?

ache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack Marketplace? > > EXTERNAL > > Hey David, > > Check our Stack Console. We use them for customer facing cloudstack > interface, billing etc. Theyve also got a marketplace on there you could use > which fits your ex

RE: CloudStack Marketplace?

Can those items be tied into/leverage Github actions/workflows? -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 7:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Marketplace? EXTERNAL While we don't have an explicit 'marketplace' f

Re: CloudStack Marketplace?

zAEbyi8SbM Regards. From: David Knuth Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 16:29 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Marketplace? Do you happen to have a link handy? -Original Message- From: Bryan Tiang Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:19 PM To: users@cloudsta

RE: CloudStack Marketplace?

Do you happen to have a link handy? -Original Message- From: Bryan Tiang Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:19 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Marketplace? EXTERNAL Hey David, Check our Stack Console. We use them for customer facing

Re: CloudStack Marketplace?

Is it stackconsole.io? Is the pricing affordable and reasonable from your experience? On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, 09:19 Bryan Tiang, wrote: > Hey David, > > Check our Stack Console. We use them for customer facing cloudstack > interface, billing etc. Theyve also got a marketplace on there you could >

Re: CloudStack Marketplace?

Hey David, Check our Stack Console. We use them for customer facing cloudstack interface, billing etc. Theyve also got a marketplace on there you could use which fits your expected use case. Regards, Bryan On 23 Apr 2025 at 3:57 AM +0800, David Knuth , wrote: > Good afternoon! > > I was curiou

Re: More bugs seems related to #9920 Re: CloudStack 4.20 VXLAN-EVPN - Management VXLAN generates error - Public VXLAN not advertising - Initial VMs running but Grey State for Agent State

**### Regarding the VXLAN** i found the Cloudstack does not link the Interface Loopback to the VXLAN interface, I did manually and now it propagates the routes **### On the AGENT side:** Not sure if this is just related to Ubuntu systems: there is an error on the management server every

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

I think you do not need to change agent.properties Instead, you need to set the network traffic label of each traffic type, for example cloudbr1. By default, management traffic uses cloudbr0, public and guest traffic use cloudbr1, which might not be what you use. -Wei On Friday, March 28, 2025,

More bugs seems related to #9920 Re: CloudStack 4.20 VXLAN-EVPN - Management VXLAN generates error - Public VXLAN not advertising - Initial VMs running but Grey State for Agent State

I created this one with the pictures, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10659 Pearl opened somethis similar: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9920 Which seems related to one Pearl was working, but if this is for 4.21 is unrealistic from the time line perspective for me

Re: CloudStack 4.20 VXLAN-EVPN - Management VXLAN generates error - Public VXLAN not advertising - Initial VMs running but Grey State for Agent State

Let me post a couple of outputs of a hypervisor we run: 9: vxlan100: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master cloudbr1 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 8e:7d:67:a7:c9:72 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::8c7d:67ff:fea7:c972/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft for

Re: CloudStack 4.20 VXLAN-EVPN - Management VXLAN generates error - Public VXLAN not advertising - Initial VMs running but Grey State for Agent State

I decided to reinstall everything clean again, drop the tables completely and start all over again. The management IPs I see them routed. even the ones for the s-VM and v-VM. I see them on the transport switches. The Public VXLAN is created, the Public IP address I am not able to see them an

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Team, Additionally I forgot to mention, v-154-VM [State-Running] [Agent State-Gray] s-285-VM [State-Running] [Agent State-Gray] is [Agent State-Gray] status OK, or the normal Status, being Gray dot color leads to thing is not normal. What should I check, I reread again the in

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

If I use a single Management server it works: Question with the IP addresses assigned: the initial VMs are running: v-154-VM s-285-VM I do not see the Public IP anywhere, not even advertised on vni1000 or any other, the public VNI is there was created by the system, but nothing

Re: CloudStack 4.20 IPv6 Primary Storage CEPH Initial VMs proxy, and secondary on KVM not created - Not Converting to RBD - IPv6 addresses show truncated

Op 01-04-2025 om 17:00 schreef Chi vediamo: I added 3 Monitors: 20XX:::::OO:24, 20XX:::::OO26, 20XX:::::OO:28 Have you tried using a DNS entry instead? Just to see if that works. I have never tried manual IPv6 addresses, I always use a Round Robin DNS

Re: CloudStack 4.20 IPv6 Primary Storage CEPH Initial VMs proxy, and secondary on KVM not created - Not Converting to RBD - IPv6 addresses show truncated

I added 3 Monitors: 20XX:::::OO:24, 20XX:::::OO26, 20XX:::::OO:28 and you can see on the logs the 20XX is truncated in some cases and in other cases the last HEX digits. 2025-04-01 10:52:24,628 WARN [utils.script.Script] (agentRequest-Handler-4:[]) (logid

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Op 29-03-2025 om 15:42 schreef Chi vediamo: Hello Wei, The VXLAN with EPVN is poorly documented, then I need all tthe guidance as possible from the community. There is no silver bullet here as each EVPN+VXLAN setup will differ from the other :-) Wido, please kindly allow me to use som

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Op 01-04-2025 om 13:16 schreef Chi vediamo: Hello Wido, Sorry I meant I only have cloudbr1, there is no cloudbr0 on the hypervisor On the management server on the UI interface when the VNI/VXLAN for Public is requested then I should enter vxlan://777 in your case ? Yes, for the first net

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Hello Wido, Sorry I meant I only have cloudbr1, there is no cloudbr0 on the hypervisor On the management server on the UI interface when the VNI/VXLAN for Public is requested then I should enter vxlan://777 in your case ? And for the VNI/VXLAN Range for guest leave it blank ? or ALso use a ful

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Op 01-04-2025 om 12:16 schreef Chi vediamo: Thank you Wido for jumping in, as always So far I only Have cloudbr1 as several VXLAN e-mail trails you indicated. Then I need to create the cloudbr0 with another VXLAN in addition to cloudbr1 ? cloudbr1 should have the management per the video yo

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Thank you Wido for jumping in, as always So far I only Have cloudbr1 as several VXLAN e-mail trails you indicated. Then I need to create the cloudbr0 with another VXLAN in addition to cloudbr1 ? cloudbr1 should have the management per the video you posted right? Hope you recall, should I includ

Re: CloudStack 4.20 IPv6 Primary Storage CEPH Initial VMs proxy, and secondary on KVM not created - Not Converting to RBD - IPv6 addresses show truncated

Hi, Rbd driver installed ? On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 13:05 Chi vediamo wrote: > Hello team, > > I am having the following problem, The Libvirt is unable to convert from > Secondary Storage to CEPH RBD. > > CEPH is purely IPV6, The RBD was created, There are no error on the CEPH > side. > > The Initia

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors

Hello Wei, The VXLAN with EPVN is poorly documented, then I need all tthe guidance as possible from the community. Wido, please kindly allow me to use some of your multiple answers to several members of the community as reference. As there is really not much info. Wei what you suggesting I did

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer

y 27, 2025 11:42 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; Pearl d'Silva Cc: dev Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer Hello Pearl, I did try everything even restarting the management server, it does not work any text from here /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapp/locales/en.

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer

Hello Pearl, I did try everything even restarting the management server, it does not work any text from here /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapp/locales/en.json, it is ot reflected on the web site, even after clearing cache. Also I was trying to modify the Link to github on the same page. S

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer

This is great, But I am unable to remove the Link to Github, is still there without a Text reference but still there. Tata Y. > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:31 PM, Fabricio Duarte > wrote: > > Complementing that only root admins can see this message on the footer, so if > you assign domain admin o

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer

Complementing that only root admins can see this message on the footer, so if you assign domain admin or user roles to customers, they will not be able to see it. Also good to mention that there is currently an open PR [1] that adds a runtime system to the ACS UI, allowing operators to apply t

Re: CloudStack 4.20 UI Changing Footer

Hi, Currently it isn't possible through the config.json file. However, that particular text is controlled by the following variable "label.report.bug" in the /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapp/locales/en.json file or the respective locale file. You can change the text of that label or set

Re: cloudstack cluster

I have already worked with 2 node + diskless on Storage and tested along with 3 node cloudstack cluster, which is working fine. I am trying to understand the whether *2 node cloudstack cluster *is possible or not...if you can point me to some document... On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 11:45 PM Wei ZHOU

Re: cloudstack cluster

I think you need to talk with your storage vendor -Wei On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 5:31 PM MP B wrote: > 1. I know that with 2 node, risk is higher than the 3 node, but cost is the > biggest factor...so the 3rd node can be some sort of qdevice, whether this > is possible with Cloudstack environment

Re: cloudstack cluster

1. I know that with 2 node, risk is higher than the 3 node, but cost is the biggest factor...so the 3rd node can be some sort of qdevice, whether this is possible with Cloudstack environment 2. hence 2 KVM HCI node+MGMT 3. linstor storage On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 6:55 PM Simon Weller wrote:

Re: cloudstack cluster

Can you give us more information on your use case? What type of storage are you planning to use? Are the MGMT servers going to be separate? -Si On Sat, Feb 22, 2025, 7:11 AM MP B wrote: > HI, Any help please > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:23 PM MP B wrote: > > > HI, is it possible to have

Re: cloudstack cluster

HI, Any help please On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:23 PM MP B wrote: > HI, is it possible to have a 2 node cloudstack/kvm cluster ? if yes how to > manage split brain... > > Thanks... >

Re: No isolation between VPCs Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Op 27/01/2025 om 03:42 schreef Chi vediamo: I need some additional guidance. I was following I think all emails I found: https://www.mail-archive.com/users@cloudstack.apache.org/msg38549.html https://www.mail-archiv

No isolation between VPCs Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

I need some additional guidance. I was following I think all emails I found: https://www.mail-archive.com/users@cloudstack.apache.org/msg38549.html https://www.mail-archive.com/users@cloudstack.apache.org/msg36477.html https://www.mail-archive.com/users@cloudstack.apache.org/msg38144.html

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Hello Wido Now I am confused: I am trying to go with the best practices including security, not a POC. Nor deploying everything in a box. That is actually useless to test anything. Then the Cloudbr1 initially created in each Hypervisor is the Management VNI used for the migration traffic and s

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Op 16/01/2025 om 13:04 schreef Chi vediamo: Hello Wido and community, Just to have the basics in simple terms: *To use the VXLAN in Cloudstack -* We need Management and Storage reacheable by plain L3, Correct ? Correct. Although you can also use a VNI for reaching management. You need

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Hello Wido and community, Just to have the basics in simple terms: To use the VXLAN in Cloudstack - We need Management and Storage reacheable by plain L3, Correct ? For the KVM Host initially: Option 1) At KVM, Do I need a PLAIN L3 only initially, WITH NO Initial cloudbr1/VXLAN? Yes/ NO? Op

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Op 13/01/2025 om 17:06 schreef Chi vediamo: Hello Wido, Thank you so much for taking the time to respond.: I bonded the interfaces for capacity. I would just create additional BGP sessions and use ECMP balancing for more capacity. I was following your YouTube videos and users mail. Yes

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Hello Wido, Thank you so much for taking the time to respond.: I bonded the interfaces for capacity. I was following your YouTube videos and users mail. Yes, VXLAN seems to be working now. The most dificult/radical part was the tunning of the parameres on Ubuntu 22. or should I use a different L

Re: Cloudstack VXLAN at the Host Re: EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

Op 11/01/2025 om 00:36 schreef Chi vediamo: Forgot to add Wido The Isolation should start, and should happen at the HOST running KVM, No VLANS needed at the Host, neither at the Leafs. But seems isolation is not happening! using cloudstack 4.20, maybe is a detail missing on my side. What

Re: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0

Thanks Pearl, Daan and everyone involved in the (informal) release work! Regards. From: Pearl Dsilva Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 20:49 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0 Dear CloudStack Comm

Re: Cloudstack Old Usage Data Clean Up

Hi Ammad, This table is the intermediate table to calculate the network usage. You can remove some very old records. You can get the actual time by event_time_millis, for example select FROM_UNIXTIME(event_time_millis/1000) from cloud_usage.usage_network limit 1; -Wei On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

e great if we can have the framework to allow > community > > > customise the ISOs, and allow selection of storage options during > > > installation - if it's storage agnostic we could even put this on the > > > project downloads page. > > > > > >

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

t; customise the ISOs, and allow selection of storage options during > > installation - if it's storage agnostic we could even put this on the > > project downloads page. > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

ptions during > installation - if it's storage agnostic we could even put this on the > project downloads page. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > From: Wei ZHOU > > Sent: Friday, Novem

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

en put this on the project > downloads page. > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 13:53 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance > > Looks great !! &

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

HI Ravi Kumar, I am from Linbit The md5sum for the download of the ISO is 8e8eea34c464b68d153e1cb76794f06e We are trying to put this on the download site too. Thanks & Regards Nischal On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM Ravi Kumar Tenneti wrote: > This is great news and please publish MD5 check

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

This is great news and please publish MD5 checksum also as after downloading 3.9GB, we are not sure whether the ISO image is correct or not. So, please publish the checksum details. On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 12:08, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Dear CloudStack users, > > Yesterday, LINBIT announced th

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

Hi Philipp, Thanks for this nice package, would be really helpful to build a platform quickly So, I have tried installing yesterday with 2 nic, I got stuck at "Making the LINSTOR controller service highly available" with an error...Will try again share the snap... But however as an option, wi

Re: 回复: Re: cloudstack - HA testing

2024年11月26日 20:51 | > | 收件人 | users | > | 抄送人 | users | > | 主题 | 回复: Re: cloudstack - HA testing | > Hi BPB, > > Yes, I have the same question regarding VM's HA. I have taken the > following steps: > > 1. Enabled HA in the compute offer, and now "Offer HA" is se

回复：回复: Re: cloudstack - HA testing

. 回复的原邮件 | 发件人 | 史洲洲 | | 发送日期 | 2024年11月26日 20:51 | | 收件人 | users | | 抄送人 | users | | 主题 | 回复: Re: cloudstack - HA testing | Hi BPB, Yes, I have the same question regarding VM's HA. I have taken the following steps: 1. Enabled HA in the compute offer, and now "Offer HA" is set

回复: Re: cloudstack - HA testing

ave some issues with the configuration. Still in the process of continuously seeking answers. Best regards. Leo. -原始邮件- 发件人: "MP B" (由 "szz...@163.com" 于 2024-11-26 13:57:24 转发) 发送时间: 2024-11-26 13:56:29 收件人: "users" 抄送: 主题: Re: cloudstack - HA testing how t

Re: cloudstack - HA testing

how to manually simulate the VM HA, how cloudstack trigger the vm migration to another host during a host issue On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 4:11 PM MP B wrote: > HI. How to setup HA and how to test VM HA in 3 host cluster environment.. > > Thanks in advance... > MPB >

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:16 PM Jimmy Huybrechts wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > That looks very cool actually, haven’t tested it yet but I most certainly > will :) > > How does it handle Cloudstack updates or do you need to provision new ISO’s > with updates? > We will update the ISO regularly, e.g.,

RE: CloudStack HCI Appliance

That's amazing, excited to try it. -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU Sent: 22 November 2024 13:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance Looks great !! On Friday, November 22, 2024, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Dear CloudStack users, >

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

ked, the subscribe button was there, so just from curiousity, i tried incognito mode and it did show, seems adblocker messes with the link displaying properly > > -- > Jimmy > > From: Embedd > Date: Friday, 22 November 2024 at 12:03 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

x27;s storage agnostic we could even put this on the project downloads page. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 13:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance Looks great !! On Friday, November 22, 2024, Ph

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

Looks great !! On Friday, November 22, 2024, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Dear CloudStack users, > > Yesterday, LINBIT announced the availability of its CloudStack HCI > appliance. It is a freely available ISO image. > > The ISO image contains > * AlmaLinux > * Apache CloudStack > * LINBIT's DRB

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

Hi Phil, That looks very cool actually, haven’t tested it yet but I most certainly will :) How does it handle Cloudstack updates or do you need to provision new ISO’s with updates? -- Jimmy From: Philipp Reisner Date: Friday, 22 November 2024 at 07:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

Maybe you should look better then :) As it works fine, but if you want a normal link then no.. the download button works fine. -- Jimmy From: Embedd Date: Friday, 22 November 2024 at 12:03 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance yeah too bad the download link

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

yeah too bad the download link doesnt appear...!!!

Re: CloudStack HCI Appliance

This looks really good! Best wishes Marc From: Philipp Reisner Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 7:37 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack HCI Appliance Dear CloudStack users, Yesterday, LINBIT announced the availability of its CloudStack HCI ap

RE: CloudStack is creating several PortGroups on DSwitch for the same VLAN

Hi Christian, The number after vlan ID is the bandwidth allowed, which can be set in a network offering level, compute offering level, global, etc... So it might happen that the bandwidth allowed for the network is, for example, 300mbps. But for the compute offering of a certain VM it is 200mbps

Re: Cloudstack - High Availability

lay/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2024 17:17 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cloudstack - High Availability > > I have an add

Re: Cloudstack - High Availability

-management https://www.shapeblue.com/host-ha-for-kvm-hosts-in-cloudstack/ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA Regards. From: Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2024 17:17 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: Cloudstack - High Availability

I have an additional question regarding this. When shutting down a Linux VM that has been created from a template with HA enabled, the VM restarted. Not shut down. Is this normal? On Sun, 22 Sept 2024, 10:31 MP B, wrote: > HI, How to enable vm/instance HA, I have configured ceph storage wanted t

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

Thanks a lot for your feedback, We will go with MariaDB, since we need a productive environment, and MariaDB Galera seems to work with no issues. Thank you all. I really appreciate it. Kind regards On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:38 AM Jürgen Gotteswinter wrote: > The easiest approach is to set ip_

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

The easiest approach is to set ip_nonlocal_bind to 1 and install keepalived on each node to handle the vip. Send all requests to this vip. Setting permissive mode is required. Apart from that I use the same settings as with normal Mysql sql-mode="STRICT_TRANS_TABLES,NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION,ERROR_

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

Good morning guys, I will go with mariadb, because percona +cloudstack is a nightmare. Thank you all Best regards On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:50 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Francisco, > > Active-active DB cluster setup isn't supported or possible due to the > GET_LOCK/RELEASE_LOCK limitations yo

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

Could you share your config file Juergen? I have a keepalive but in the haproxies. Kind regards On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 3:03 PM Jürgen Gotteswinter wrote: > Hello, > > i am currently also working on such a setup, like you said it causes > issues when distributing the write requests. My solution

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

Hello, i am currently also working on such a setup, like you said it causes issues when distributing the write requests. My solution is to use keepalived on each cluster node to make sure writes only go to a single node (VIP with NAT 3306 -> 127.0.0.1:3306). So far, no problems. Cheers, Jue

Re: CloudStack Compatibility with Percona XtraDB

Hi Francisco, Active-active DB cluster setup isn't supported or possible due to the GET_LOCK/RELEASE_LOCK limitations you've found. However, if you're using a MySQL router or ProxySQL or similar middleware, then you can split reads across nodes but write to only a single node at a time. Altern

Re: cloudstack translations

Hello, Piotr If you're interested in translating ACS or improving the translation, you should create a PR translating the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/ui/public/locales/en.json file in a new file inside locales (like https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blame/main/ui/public/

RE: Cloudstack Object Storage

Thanks Wei! -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 2:28 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack Object Storage It will be supported in 4.20 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8389 -Wei On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 1:25 PM Alexandru

Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster

tations you may not use > > your db cluster in active-active configuration. > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > From: Marty Godsey > > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 11:22:47 PM > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster

11:22:47 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster > > I use a Galera Cluster for my DB, which works without issue. I do not, for > other reasons, load balance. It is set to failover. Before I had to make > this change

Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster

Worth mentioning here that due to GET_LOCK limitations you may not use your db cluster in active-active configuration. Regards. From: Marty Godsey Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 11:22:47 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.19

Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster

at 1:46 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Jon, Whether

Re: Cloudstack 4.19 Behavior with MariaDB Galera Cluster

Hello Jon, Whether there will be randomness or not depends on your setup. As far as I know, there are two possible modes for the connection with Galera clusters: sequential and loadbalance. With the sequential mode, the connector will try to connect to hosts in the order in which they were de

Re: Cloudstack Managment service Self Fencing

Hello Joan, I don’t seem to understand fencing in this case, please elaborate. Does CloudStack WebUI or API show the Node_2 management server as offline? Regards, Jayanth Reddy From: Joan g Date: Monday, 27 May 2024 at 11:49 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Cloudstack Managment serv

Re: Cloudstack migration

Wei, Thanks for the confirmation - Steve On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:02 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > The qemu-kvm on rocky8 should have all the features of qemu-kvm-ev on > centos7. > > > -Wei > > On Sunday, May 12, 2024, S.Fuller wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply Rohit. Have the changes that were in t

Re: Cloudstack migration

The qemu-kvm on rocky8 should have all the features of qemu-kvm-ev on centos7. -Wei On Sunday, May 12, 2024, S.Fuller wrote: > Thanks for the reply Rohit. Have the changes that were in the -ev releases > migrated into the standard version? > > - Steve > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 5:58 PM Rohit

Re: Cloudstack migration

Thanks for the reply Rohit. Have the changes that were in the -ev releases migrated into the standard version? - Steve On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 5:58 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Steve, > > That’s correct newer EL8/EL9 don’t have the -ev releases as they aren’t > available or necessary anymore. > >

Re: Cloudstack migration

Hi Steve, That’s correct newer EL8/EL9 don’t have the -ev releases as they aren’t available or necessary anymore. Since there may not be an in place upgrade path, you can create new cluster or add new hosts and rolling migrate your hosts and VMs. Regards. Regards.

Re: CloudStack management server as a VM on KVM hypervisor

Hi Kapil, It can be done but it's not wise. You'd need to manually start the VM. We run a small Proxmox cluster to host our ACS supporting VMs: management, rabbitmq, influxdb, secondary storage nfs. Kind regards, Ruben Bosch On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:46 AM Kapil Bhuskute wrote: > Hello, > We

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

hich can be used to enforce feature that accounts are allowed to deploy X > number of VMs on one host-tag (that could related to an arch) vs deploy Y > number of VMs on others. > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > S

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

Ms on one host-tag (that could related to an arch) vs deploy Y number of VMs on others. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 21:45 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on mul

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

different clusters should be fine. maybe @Rohit Yadav can give some advice. -Wei On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > > good point Rishi, > I think you would have to separate the hardware into different > clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of > an

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

good point Rishi, I think you would have to separate the hardware into different clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of anybody doing a setup like yours. On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 6:56 PM Rishi Misra wrote: > > Can a CloudStack instance running on x86 manage deployments

Re: cloudstack-agent mismatch size

it works now, thanks so much :) On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:52 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Francisco, all, > > We've in process of publishing the new 4.18.2.0 release, due to which the > repo metadata has been changed. > > The download.cloudstack.org repo is served by CDN77 (I've purged the > cach

Re: cloudstack-agent mismatch size

Hi Francisco, all, We've in process of publishing the new 4.18.2.0 release, due to which the repo metadata has been changed. The download.cloudstack.org repo is served by CDN77 (I've purged the cache and changed caching timeout from 12hrs to 1hr) and can have caching issue around the time an e

Re: cloudstack on debian 10/11

ok quick update debian 11.9 as managemnt and host both work on 192.168.xxx.xxx address space as aio, cant seem to connect XCP-NG 8.2.0 though have to debug On Monday 15 April 2024 08:55:34 PM (+07:00), Embedded wrote: > > > > On Monday 15 April 2024 06:33:26 PM (+07:00), Wei ZHOU wrote: >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >