Re: XenServer bond question

2016-08-30 Thread Daniel Mezentsev
ache.org Subject: XenServer bond question Hi guys, pheraps I should post this question on Citrix forum but I think that here I can find a more "practical" answer based on similar infrastructure. :) I've a CS 4.6 with XS 6.2 clusters and here's my network config: - Management + Storage: 2 NI

Re: XenServer bond question

2016-08-24 Thread Stavros Konstantaras
Hi Allessandro, In our environment with servers of 4 NICs, we configured it as following: - 1 bond for management traffic (NICs of 1Gbps) - 1 bond for storage,public & guest traffic by using VLAN separation of course (NICs of 10Gbps) In your case I would configure it as following - 1 bond for

Re: R: XenServer bond question

2016-08-23 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
I would choose (thinking about redundancy): 2 Storage + Management (one NIC is standby) 2 Guest 2 Public But the following would ensure all 6 NICs would work constantly: 1 Storage 1 Management 2 Guest 2 Public (in general) I would choose some of the 2 options above. Let's say that your

Re: R: XenServer bond question

2016-08-23 Thread Alessandro Caviglione
Since I've 6 NIC for each Server, which is the best config? 2 Management 2 Storage + Guest 2 Public ?? On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < gabr...@autonomiccs.com.br> wrote: > I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if > the storage and

Re: R: XenServer bond question

2016-08-23 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if the storage and management are suffering from low throughput. If the main focus is redundancy, keeping management + storage in a bond of 2 NICs is worth (considering that you would not have other 2 NICs free to use and

R: XenServer bond question

2016-08-23 Thread c.alessandro
Ok, so do you think that the best config is to keep management network separate from storage? If in next cluster I’ll move storage network to another bond, do you think I’ll able to use both NIC for throughput? Da: Gabriel Beims Bräscher

Re: XenServer bond question

2016-08-23 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
ad balancing, you >> can >> > have MORE 1Gb streams. >> > >> > So what your seeing is normal. >> > >> > Also do a ovs-vsctl list port and a xe bond-list params=all to make sure >> > your bonds are negotiating properly. >> > >> &g

RE: XenServer bond question

2016-08-22 Thread Marty Godsey
list port and a xe bond-list params=all to make sure your bonds are negotiating properly. Regards, Marty Godsey -Original Message- From: Alessandro Caviglione [mailto:c.alessan...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:02 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: XenServer bond

XenServer bond question

2016-08-22 Thread Alessandro Caviglione
Hi guys, pheraps I should post this question on Citrix forum but I think that here I can find a more "practical" answer based on similar infrastructure. :) I've a CS 4.6 with XS 6.2 clusters and here's my network config: - Management + Storage: 2 NIC LACP - Guest: 2 NIC LACP - Public: 2 NIC LACP