Hi all,
I learned that KVM storage live migration is only possible in some rare
cases for our setup using cloudstack 4.11.
Andrija pointed me to the steps necessary to do KVM live storage
migrations on the libvirt layer and doing the database magic
afterwards. This works well. If this is the
ne to use :)
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:52, Melanie Desaive
> wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > looks good. Just did an
> >
> > update network_offerings set service_offering_id = > offering id> where id =
> >
> > and restarted one of th
like cpus, ram?
Could gain lots of flexibility if this is safely possible.
Greetings,
Melanie
Am Montag, den 04.11.2019, 15:45 + schrieb Richard Lawley:
> There's nothing in the API or the UI. We just change it in the DB.
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 13:48, Melanie Desaive
> w
fferings with different system offerings.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 08:33, Melanie Desaive
> wrote:
> > Good morning Andrija,
> >
> > yes, I did restart mgmt. Documentation states that.
> >
> > Interestingly the documenta
Panic:
> tried restarting mgmt after tag change? Usually not required but
> might be
> for systemVMs.
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 15:21 Melanie Desaive,
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just tried to set up storage tags for System VMs, but the
> > beh
Hi all,
I just tried to set up storage tags for System VMs, but the behaviour
is not as expected. The deployment planner does not seem to take the
storage tag into account when deciding over the storage.
--
The only storage with the tag "SYSTEMV" ist "ACS-LUN-SAS-01' with id=10
mysql> select
ak bad...so can't comment there.
> You are using those as preSetup in KVM/CloudStack I guess - if it
> works,
> then all good.
> But...move on I suggest, if possible :)
>
> Best
> Andrija
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 13:16, Melanie Desaive <
> m.desa...@heinlein-s
t;we" had to use qemu/libvirt from the "oVirt" repo which
> DOES
> (DID) support storage live migration (normal EV packages from the
> Special
> Interest Group (2.12 tested) - did NOT include this...)
>
> I can send you step-by-step .docx guide for manually mimicking wha
Hi all,
I am currently doing my first steps with KVM as hypervisor for
CloudStack. I was shocked to realize that currently live volume
migration between different shared storages is not supported with KVM.
This is a feature I use intensively with XenServer.
How do you get along with this
Hi Andrija,
Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2019, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andrija Panic:
> One question though, why are you aiming to use OVS for KVM? i.e. why
> not regular/default Linux bridge?
I am more familiar with OpenVSwitch and I did have the impression that
is gives more configuration options for
Hi Andrija,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Andrija Panic:
> a) I assume you are planning on staying on single "Physical network"
> in ACS?
Yes. But actually I do have to admit, that I am not aware, how more
than one "Physical Network" could be set up for one zone and what that
Hello,
we plan to change from XenServer to KVM virtualisation for Apache
CloudStack 4.11 with advanced networking.
I am currently installing an KVM proof of concept und would like to
integrate two KVM hosts for testing as a new cluster to CloudStack.
I got some questions concerning the
Hi Fariborz,
what Hypervisor are you using? I tested the network limits for
XenServer some months ago and think to remember, that I learned there
are differences how upload and download rates are realized.
If you are interested, I could look into it once again and share my
findings with you.
Wow! Great news! Congratulations Paul!
And thanks a lot to Mike!
All my best wishes to all of you!
Am Montag, den 11.03.2019, 15:16 + schrieb Tutkowski, Mike:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As you may know, the role of VP of CloudStack (Chair of the
> CloudStack PMC) has a one-year term. My term has
ything:
>
> > SELECT id,name,dns1,dns2 FROM cloud.networks where id=207
> > id | name | dns1 | dns2 |
> > 207 | dagnet2 | 1.1.1.1 | 9.9.9.9
>
> As far as I can see there's no API call to manipulate this either.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonsteb
Hi all,
for an isolated Network: Is it possible to configure an alternative DNS
Server IP for the network through the API or GUI?
I want an individual IP from the isolated network itself to be pushed
as DNS server by the VR DHCP-server. Not the DNS servers defined for
the zone and not the VRs
Hi all,
I stumbled over an old Paper of Abhinandan Prateek for CCC Miami where
he describes how to clean up secondary Storage.
Do I get it right, that a:
mysql> select store_id,physical_size,install_path,volume_id,volumes.name
from volume_store_ref left join volumes on
uot; table was NOT updated - we had an in-house patch for this to
>update this one as well...
>
>Above I always say "manually change to some new one - and later via UI"
> -
>in order to generate proper usage records for final offering chosen -
>otherwise you can target fi
ng starting VM
> (attaching volume to VM in boot process).
>
> Let me know if I can help more.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 18:41 Melanie Desaive wrote:
>
>> Hi andrija,
>>
>> thanks a lot for your answer.
>>
>> Indeed is absolutel
)
>and later via UI/API to correct (same size) disk offering (or bigger if
>you
>want to really resize)
>
>I can try to share a patch in a non-developer, copy/paste way - in case
>you
>want to patch your ACS to support this (as explained at the begining of
>the
>email...)
Hi all,
we are currently reorganizing our SAN Setup and I would like to
introduce new storage tags on my existing volumes.
I was naively assuming to simply change the tags or offering by GUI or
API calls.
Does not seem to work. Only way to change the tags, seems to be by using
a new disk
Hi all,
do I get it right, that there is no way to limit IOPS per volume with
XenServer as hypervisor? (Using ACS 4.11)
I tried the settings to limit IO bandwidth and IOPS per volume on
hypervisor side with XenServer and only the bandwidth limitation seems
to have an effect. Seems to me, that
Hi Ivan,
Sven is a long time member of German CloudStack Usergroup, I expect him
to have a meeting in Leipzig well organized. Our Usergroup here in
Germany is quite an active bunch of people, both competent and
openminded. So I would be looking forward to join a meetup in Leipzig!
Greetings,
Am 21.06.2018 um 17:08 schrieb Daan Hoogland:
> makes sense, well let's hope all breaks soon ;)
I am sure it will break! :D
And then I will get back to you with more questions!
Thanks a lot for taking the time!
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Melanie Desaive <
> m.d
CKUP.
Looked like:
[root@acs-compute-5 ~]# /opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh checkrouter.sh
169.254.1.178
Status: BACKUP
root@r-2595-VM:~# /opt/cloud/bin/checkrouter.sh
Status: BACKUP
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Melanie Desaive <
> m.desa...@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>
urance of the problem
is attached to this email.
Greetings,
Melanie
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Melanie Desaive <
> m.desa...@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we have a recurring problem with our virtual routers. By the log
>> messages
Hi all,
we have a recurring problem with our virtual routers. By the log
messages it seems that com.cloud.agent.api.CheckRouterCommand runs into
a timeout and therefore switches to UNKNOWN.
All network traffic through the routers is still working. They can be
accessed by their link-local IP
Hi Daan,
Am 18.05.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Daan Hoogland:
> It seems that only 5 of those volumes should have been
> reported between the 16th and the 16th, correct? Can you query for events
> for those volumes in the event table? By the order of events we might be
> able to draw some conclusions.
Hi all,
I am just starting to have a first look on CloudStack Usage Service in 4.11.
Maybe I am getting something wrong, but to me it seems, that Usage
reports lists destroyed and expunged Volumes. Is that the intended
behaviour?
For an example project it lists the following records:
Hi Yiping,
Am 11.04.2018 um 23:30 schrieb Yiping Zhang:
>
> Why does CloudStack convert just a few rhel 6.x instances into HVM mode,
> while leaving most in PV mode?
> How would I force them back to PV guests?
To my understanding CloudStacks decides about the virtualiuzation mode
of a VM
Hi all,
on one of our two CloudStack instances we have an issue adding NICs to
VMs after upgrading to 4.11.0.0. On another instance the problem does
not occur after upgrade.
Before posting an issue on GitHub I would like to know if someone else
can reproduce the following problem:
Our setup:
Hi Dag,
Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues.
Those are:
Admin Dashboard System Capacity broken with German Locale #2539
problem adding new shared network NIC to VM "A NIC with this MAC address
exits for network:"
Hi all,
after upgrading to 4.11 we have the issue, that isolated nets created
with the web-UI are always created for the IP range 10.1.1.0/24 - no
matter what values are filled in the fields "Guest Gateway" and "Guest
Netmask".
Creating an isolated network with CloudMonkey works perfectly using
Sehr schön,
ich habe gerade meine Bahntickets und Hotebuchung bekommen. :)
Bin also auch beim Abendprogramm dabei.
Liebe Grüße,
Melanie
Am 26.02.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Swen - swen.io:
> Hi @all,
>
> just a reminder for the first German CloudStack Meetup this year in
> Frankfurt. Speeches will
Hi all,
I am currently trying to set up an isolated Networks with redundant
routers in CloudStack 4.9.2, but fail to solve a problem:
Any time I start a virtual machine on the isolated network the virtual
router in the master role looses its service IP on the internal network.
A simple "service
migrating? What
> hypervisor are you using?
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
>
> Swen Brüseke
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Melanie Desaive [mailto:m.desa...@heinlein-support.de]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Mai 2017 09:46
> An: users@cloud
Hi all,
does anyone know a way to abort a running storage migration without
risking corrupted data?
That information could help me a lot!
Greetings,
Melanie
--
--
Heinlein Support GmbH
Linux: Akademie - Support - Hosting
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel: 030 / 40 50 51 - 0
Fax: 030 / 40
urther in this direction.
Greetings,
Melanie
>
> On 28/03/2017, 14:48, "Melanie Desaive" <m.desa...@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> on Sunday we had an issue, because one VM was unexpetedly down. After
> starting the VM in ACS everything worked f
Hi all,
on Sunday we had an issue, because one VM was unexpetedly down. After
starting the VM in ACS everything worked fine again.
After investigating I found out the following situation:
The ACS Logs point out, that ACS received a poweroff report while the VM
was expected to be running:
---
Hi all,
my college and I are having a dispute on when cloudstack should
automatically trigger storage migrations and what options we have to
control cloudstacks behavior in terms of storage migrations.
We are operating a setup with two XenServer clusters which are combined
into one pod. Each
40 matches
Mail list logo
