AW: CloudStack Confirmed Events - 2023

Hello Ivet, we are interested of some kind of sponsoring. We are in the middle of starting our proIO Cloud based on CloudStack and using some kind of CS for a long time now for our old cloud infrastructure. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke   proIO GmbH Kleyerstr. 79

AW: KVM with shared storage

e of years ago about a > scaleio storage driver, but I'm not sure whether there was any > movement on that or not. > > > - Si > > > > From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 4:57 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache

KVM with shared storage

Hi @all, I am evaluating KVM for our Cloudstack installation. We are using XenServer at the moment. We want to use shared storage so we can do live migration of VMs. For our KVM hosts I am using CentOS7 with standard kernel as OS and for shared storage I am evaluating ScaleIO. KVM and ScaleIO

AW: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors?

] Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 12:41 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> Betreff: Re: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors? We too was evaluating ScaleIO on XS, now we move to KVM or Hyper-V but always with ScaleIO, I don't understan

AW: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors?

Hi Alessandro, we are in the same situation with using XenServer 6.5. Besides it will not be patched XS6.5 has poor memory performance. We are in the middle of evaluating KVM with ScaleIO to get rid of XenServer in the near future. I am stuck right now on how to mount a ScaleIO volume do a KVM

AW: AW: AW: KVM storage cluster

] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2018 16:04 An: users <users@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: KVM storage cluster >From my extremely short reading on ScaleIO few months ago, they are utilizing >RAM or similar for

AW: AW: AW: KVM storage cluster

blocks than the IOPS are dropping to 11.000. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2018 15:57 An: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> Cc:

AW: AW: KVM storage cluster

freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Von: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2018 02:58 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> Betreff: Re: AW: KVM storage cluster Hi, Swen. Do you test with

AW: KVM storage cluster

I am also testing with ScaleIO on CentOS7 with KVM. With a 3 node cluster with each node has 2x 2TB SSD (Samsung PM1663a) I get 250.000 IOPS when doing a fio test (random 4k). The only problem is that I do not know how to mount the shared volume so that KVM can use it to store vms on it. Does

AW: Quick 1 Question Survey

Cloudstack Management = centos6 KVM/XEN = XenServer 6.5 SP1 Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rene Moser [mailto:m...@renemoser.net] Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. September 2017 14:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Quick 1 Question

AW: somebody experience with bare metal?

Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Harikrishna Patnala [mailto:harikrishna.patn...@accelerite.com] Gesendet: Montag, 11. September 2017 11:01 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH <s.brues...@proio.com> Betreff: Re: somebody expe

AW: cloud-set-guest-password working with systemctl

Hi Sebastian, if you want you can take a look at our preseed and sysprep configs: https://gitlab.proio.com/s.brueseke/megonacloudtemplates You can also find ready templates here: http://openvm.eu/. Thanks again to Nux. :-) Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche

AW: Free capacity calculation within ACS

Hi Ingo, did you try to work with host tags? I am not sure if this will solve it, but it is worth a try. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jochim, Ingo [mailto:ingo.joc...@bitgroup.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2017 09:48 An:

somebody experience with bare metal?

Hello, I have 2 questions and hope somebody can share his/her experience with me: 1) Does somebody have experience with bare metal servers in an advanced network environment? 2) As far as I understand the docu correctly bare metal servers will only work with Force10 switches because of

KVM evaluation

Hi, we want to give KVM a change in our CS installation. Can somebody provide his/her experience? - Which version of KVM are you using? - What host OS are you running KVM on? - What do you tweak on your KVM installations? Thank you very much for sharing this information! Mit freundlichen

AW: Creating a Cloud-Init Ready Template for CentOS7

Hi, we are using the following config for template createn via virt-install: https://gitlab.proio.com/s.brueseke/megonacloudtemplates/blob/master/CentOS/centos7.cfg But take a look at: http://dl.openvm.eu/ You can find tempates there. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen

AW: Instance with a larger disk size then Template

Hi Imran, you are talking about 3 different levels here to reach your goal of resizing a volume. First level is the volume itself. This is what you can do within CS. After that you need to extend the partition and then you need to expand the filesystem. The last to levels you need to do within

AW: Snapshot and secondary storage utilisation.

Hi Makran, please take a look at global setting "snapshot.delta.max". As far as I understand scheduled snapshots ACP is using deltas to minimize time and transferred data. So after the first snapshot has been done, the next is only a delta until you hit snapshot.delta.max. Because ACP is

AW: Recreating SystemVM's

I once did have some similar problem with my systemvms and my root cause was that in the global settings it referred to the wrong systemvm template. I am not sure if this helps you, but wanted to tell you. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

AW: How to stop running storage migration?

Hi Melanie, are you talking about a running VM or just a volume you are migrating? What hypervisor are you using? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Melanie Desaive [mailto:m.desa...@heinlein-support.de] Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Mai

AW: XenServer VM does no longer start

- Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 13:49 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: AW: XenServer VM does no longer start Hi! How can I check that? I tried starting the VM, not a single line appeared on the SMlog

AW: XenServer VM does no longer start

Hi Martin, does the volume still exist on primary storage? You can also take a look at SMlog on XenServer. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 12:27 An:

AW: Unplanned downtime

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Vibol Vireak [mailto:vibolvir...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 15:15 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: Unplanned downtime I just install cloudstack, kvm as a hypervisor with ceph primary storage. And i don't have

AW: Unplanned downtime

] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 12:11 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: Unplanned downtime Dear Swen, Well firstly I'm really appreciated your response and apologize for make u confusing my question I'm well understanding your Answer, and i just make my

AW: Unplanned downtime

Hi Vibol, I do not get you question 100%. What do you mean by unplanned hypervisor downtime? Do you mean that a hypervisor is crashing and goes down? CS has tools to restart VMs that should not be down. But you will have a downtime for VMs between crash of hypervisor and restarting the VM on

AW: Issues upgrading to XenServer 7

Hi Martin, here are my 2 cents: we do not upgrade XenServer in our CS installation at all. What we do is to move all VMs from one host, eject it from the pool and delete it from CS. After that we are doing a fresh installation of XenServer, create a new pool and add this pool as new cluster to

ApacheCon Miami

Hey guys, somebody plan to visit ApacheCon (http://us.cloudstackcollab.org/) in Miami this May? Is there a way for our community to get a special price for tickets? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft:

developing own webinterface

Hello, we want to develop our own webinterface for CS and I want to ask if somebody also did this in the past and can share the experience. Our webinterface will use API calls, but what language is the best to use for a webinterface? We use PHP a lot for our web projects, but I am not use if

AW: Public IaaS advanced zone

Hi Chiradeep, take a look at www.megona.de. Page is in German, but interface is in English too. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chirade...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 05:07 An:

AW: Template management

you are using a lot more space in your estate. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 23/01/2017, 08:35, "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" <s.brues...@proio.com> wrote: I did some testing and want to share my findings: When using local storage a way to delete old

AW: Template management

so users have a rollback point. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 19/01/2017, 14:09, "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" <s.brues...@proio.com> wrote: Hi Dag, how can I provide connection to an internal repo for all networks in my CS installation by defau

AW: Template management

On 19/01/2017, 13:31, "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" <s.brues...@proio.com> wrote: @Dag: Thanks for the confirmation and for the link. @Rene: Of course it is the user's responsibility, but we want to provide a VM with the latest updates each time you deploy a new VM. :-) I

AW: Template management

Swen On 01/19/2017 10:04 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote: > I am really interested in other solutions and workflows, so please > shoot. :-) We decided to not doing or minimize (1-2 updates per year) templates updates for "system updates" for two main reasons: 1. It is the user'

Template management

Hey guys, I have a question regarding templates and how you manage these in you CS installation. We are planning to create a new template for Debian, CentOS and Ubuntu each month to keep them up2date, because we have a short lifecycle for servers. Does anybody do the same or has other

AW: API migrateVirtualMachine does not respect affinity group assignment

We run into this "problem" too. Here are my 2 cents: API call should respect affinity groups, but it should be able for administrator to force a migration (force=true). As an administrator you cannot control (or have in mind) all affinity groups when you need to evacuate a host. At the moment

AW: AW: AW: AW: Shared Network

v On 19.10.2016 09:58, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote: > Can you please post the error mesg from management server log? > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, > > Swen > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jānis Andersons | Failiem.lv [mailto:j...@fail

AW: AW: AW: Shared Network

://serveri.failiem.lv http://files.fm http://failiem.lv mobile: +371 26606064 j...@failiem.lv On 18.10.2016 19:01, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote: > Did you used a different start ip? > > I have added the first range from x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.150 and a second from > x.x.x.151 to x.x.x.254. > vlan gate

AW: AW: Shared Network

. Problem is that I already added x.x.x.x/24 subnet -- Janis On 18.10.2016 18:47, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote: > Just add the other range to your cloudstack. > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, > > Swen > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: J

AW: Storagemigration / Primary Storages

I am not sure if the workflow is deleting a volume copied to another storage, but I know that there is a cleanup job. Take a look at global setting: storage.cleanup.interval Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephan Seitz

AW: Migrate system VMs from a cluster to another

Hi Ugo, put your hosts of the old cluster into maintenance mode and CS will start the System VMs on another cluster. There will be a short downtime. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet:

AW: snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage

freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pavan Bandarupally [mailto:pavan.bandarupa...@accelerite.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. April 2016 14:03 An: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH; users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: RE: snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage

AW: snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage

will manually trigger the GC on Xenserver which should clean up these if GC is not run for some reason) ? Regards, Pavan -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 4:05 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: AW: snapshot

AW: snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage

freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pavan Bandarupally [mailto:pavan.bandarupa...@accelerite.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. April 2016 11:17 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage Hi

snapshot cleanup on hypervisor primary storage

Hey guys, we are using CS 4.5 with XenServer 6.5 SP1 and observed a behavior with volume-snapshots that will fill up your primary storage over time: Workflow: 1. create an instance 2. create a volume-snapshot of the ROOT-disk of that instance 3. delete instance and expunge it 4. check primary

AW: Storage decommissioning

gt;> >> >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, >> >> >> >> Swen >> >> >> >> *Von:* Alessandro Caviglione [mailto:c.alessan...@gmail.com] >> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 24. März 2016 12:06 >> *An:* S.

AW: CloudStack HA

Hi Martins, you need to check XenServer logs. CS will not reboot any hypervisor. XenServer will also reboot in some situations where Dom0 has no resources (CPU, RAM) left. Which version of XS are you using? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

AW: Storage decommissioning

Hi Alessandro, moving ROOT and DATA volumes should be no problem and can be done via webinterface. Some hypervisor can do this even without downtime. What hypervisor do you use? Moving your secondary storage is difficult, because there is now automation as far as I know. But we are not using

AW: Persisting Source IP on Load Balancers

[mailto:len.bellem...@alternativenetworks.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2016 18:22 An: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH; users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: RE: Persisting Source IP on Load Balancers Thanks Swen, OK, then I suppose my next question would be, could I then terminate the SSL on the virtual router

AW: Persisting Source IP on Load Balancers

Hi Len, you need to change the LogFormat on the target servers behind the LB. If you are using apache2 do the this: 1. open your apache2 conf file 2. add "LogFormat "%{X-Forwarded-For}i %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %O" common_lb" to the LogFormat section 3. open your vhost file and swap "common" to

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

Thank you very much! :-) Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 15:29 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2016 12:32 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data Yes indeed. Put a script in /var/lib/cloud/scripts/per-boot, it will be executed

AW: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

:54 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data I am using cloud-init in the templates, but as I said I have not looked that much into it. I just let DHCP do its job. I would look at the per-boot scripts hack. :) -- Sent from

AW: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

@li.nux.ro] Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2016 11:38 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data Swen, I am not very familiar with it, but unless they have a proper module in place to deal with DHCP as they do with the hosts fil

AW: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

GmbH Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data Ah I see. Well, afaik the fqdn should be provided via DHCP, right? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "S. Brüseke - pr

AW: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2016 11:22 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: cloud-init and user-data/meta-data Hi Swen, >From that page: "local-

cloud-init and user-data/meta-data

Hi to all, I am testing cloud-init in our CS installation. I want to recreate /etc/hosts on first boot so I use "manage_etc_hosts: true". The recreation works but it looks like the fqdn is not provided by CS. As far as I understand cloud-init uses user-data/meta-data to get all needed

glibc vulnerable (CVE-2015-7547)

Hi, is the latest system vm template vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547 (https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7547)? I cannot find anything about it in the mailinglist and/or CS page. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke

overprovisioning of local storage

Hi, we are using CS 4.4.0 and it looks like we are unable to overprovisioning local storage. We configured storage.overprovisioning.factor with 4 and using ext local storage on XenServer pools. Is this a known limitation/bug? And if so does anybody know if this has been fixed in newer

AW: Working Debian template

(0) 69 739049-15 Fax: +(49) (0) 69 739049-25 Web:  www.proio.com - Support - Mail: supp...@proio.com 24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855 Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 09:43 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff

Working Debian template

Hi, does someone created a working template with Debian 7 for CS? I used http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.6/templates.html#creating-a-linux-template but still have a problem with /etc/hosts. I also tried https://gist.github.com/makuk66/6379642 and the

Problem with storage live migration

Hi, we ran into a problem with storage live migration in CLoudstack and need your help to verify this. We are using XenServer with local storage. Steps to reproduce: 1. create an instance from an ISO (not template!) on local storage 2. while instance is running migrate it to another XenServer

AW: AW: Deleting Compute Offering

a Reinstall VM operation (that recreates a VM from template) and it worked fine. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 5:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: AW: Deleting Compute Offering

AW: Deleting Compute Offering

, Somesh -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 5:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: AW: Deleting Compute Offering Hi Vadim, I am not 100% sure, but I think I was able to delete a compute offering while VMs

AW: Deleting Compute Offering

An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: Deleting Compute Offering Hello Swen, If I am not mistaken - you can't delete offering if it is used. You will get an error. First -- you must assign new offering and then remove the old one Vadim. -Original

Deleting Compute Offering

Hi, I need to delete a Compute Offering because it is using a storage tag of a primary storage which we want to get rid of in the future and I do not want users to still be able to deploy new VMs on this primary storage. Of course it is easy to delete the offering, but what will happen with

storage migration of vm on local storage

Hi, documentation is a little bit confusing about this. Is it possible in CS 4.3 (XenServer 6.2 SP! as hypervisor) to migrate a vm if this vm is on local storage without to stop the vm? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke

system VMs on local storage

Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs

AW: system VMs on local storage

, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate

AW: AW: system VMs on local storage

/28/15, 6:12 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: How do you recreate VRs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:30 An: users

enable local storage

Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS. I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which needs to run

AW: enable local storage

restart is required for local storage to be discovered for already added hosts. For new hosts it gets added at the time of adding host. On 28-May-2015, at 7:03 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added

AW: cpu overprovisioning

...@gmail.com wrote: I have not looked at the code, but that seems odd. Restarting VMs instances to update the resource usage/resource availability when changing the overprovisioning factor. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.commailto:s.brues...@proio.com

AW: cpu overprovisioning

This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit

AW: AW: cpu overprovisioning

2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor

AW: cpu overprovisioning

say instance, did you mean CS web application instance? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:16 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after

volume download link will not be deleted

Hi, we are using CS 4.3.0.2 and I think we found a bug. 1. Create a volume out of a snapshot 2. Extract (download) the volume via UI 3. Delete volume If you do this the garbage collector will not delete the symlink on secondary storage in /var/www/html/userdata/ If you do not delete the volume

AW: volume download link will not be deleted

) (0) 69 739049-25 Web: www.proio.com - Support - Mail: supp...@proio.com 24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855 Von: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. April 2015 16:20 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: volume download link

AW: Workflow for extracting a snapshot

will be downloadable forever. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. April 2015 17:05 An: Cloudstack users mailing list; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: Re: Workflow for extracting

AW: Workflow for extracting a snapshot

Tel: +(49) (0) 69 739049-15 Fax: +(49) (0) 69 739049-25 Web: www.proio.com - Support - Mail: supp...@proio.com 24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 10:33 An: users

Workflow for extracting a snapshot

Hi, can somebody tell me what the best workflow is to extract snapshots? As far as I know a direct extraction of a snapshot is not possible. The VM needs to run all the time during the extraction! Here is my workflow: 1. create snapshot of volume 2. create new volume via snapshot 3. download

[USAGE] usagetype 6 not providing virtualmachineid (CLOUDSTACK-8348)

Hello, listUsageRecords does not provide virtualmachineid with usagetype 6 (Volume), but in my opinion this is needed for correct billing an instance. API call listVolumes is providing the virtualmachineid so the information is in the system, but will not be provided by usage. What is your