Re: Better go go shell

Understood. Thanks. On 11/4/15, 12:19 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" wrote: >My goal was not to provide a jline based console on top of the existing >runtime, I've already done that in Karaf years ago, the goal was to >integrate the jline3 code base and provide new features, hence

Re: Better go go shell

Dear Guillaume, Ah, I see. You are using gogo runtime version 17.0 as a dependency. This forces everyone to update gogo runtime, and backward compatibility suffers greatly, and I am unsure of the maturity of V0.17 Do you think the use of version 16.0 or lower makes sense, as the console would

Re: Better go go shell

I've been improving JLine, Gogo Runtime and wrote a new module for JLine + Gogo, similar to gogo-shell, but with tighter integration. Feel free to have a look at it if you want. You'll have to build https://github.com/jline/jline2/tree/jline3 and

Re: Better go go shell

I always wondered why the 'fork' of gogo that's in Karaf was never contributed back into Felix? I think that it is much better in terms of usability (completion, colours) and it would be nice if it could be used by the Felix framework as well, i.e. be shipped as the default shell implementation

Re: Better go go shell

Agreed. But which way to go a) back port the Karaf one? B) the new console version by Guillaume Nodet Best Frank On 11/3/15, 2:26 PM, "David Bosschaert" wrote: >I always wondered why the 'fork' of gogo that's in Karaf was never >contributed back into Felix? I

RE: Better go go shell

} CLI docs: http://www.knopflerfish.org/releases/3.3.0/docs/bundledoc/index.html?docpage=console/index.html Regards, Renato > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:18:24 +0100 > Subject: Better go go shell > From: fr...@frankjlangel.com > To: users@felix.apache.org > > Hi, > > Are there a

Re: Better go go shell

Awesome, I try it out On 11/3/15, 1:37 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" wrote: >I've been improving JLine, Gogo Runtime and wrote a new module for JLine + >Gogo, similar to gogo-shell, but with tighter integration. >Feel free to have a look at it if you want. > >You'll have to build

Re: Better go go shell

Hi Frank I know that Guillaume is working on bunch of improvement on the shell. I don't know if it's on the Karaf Shell or Gogo Shell. Anyway, why not using Karaf for the shell ? It provides autocompletion, history, etc. Regards JB On 11/03/2015 12:18 PM, Frank Langel wrote: Hi, Are

Re: Better go go shell

Hi Guillaume, I started working on it, but realized you are using Java 1.8, and we are still on 1.7 for a while :=( Will try it once we moved. Frank On 11/3/15, 2:36 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" wrote: >The main reason is that the Karaf specific way of writing commands, on

Re: Better go go shell

Dear Guillaume, Your shell is referencing the following org.apache.felix.gogo.api.Job which I cannot find anywhere. Moreover, I cannot find org.apache.felix org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime 0.17.0-SNAPSHOT Especially not here

Re: Better go go shell

Yeah, years ago, Karaf was quite monolithic. Things have improved a lot since though. Anyway, the new module I mentioned earlier has very few dependencies: gogo-runtime, jline, gogo-jline, and jansi when running on windows. 2015-11-03 14:35 GMT+01:00 Marcel Offermans

Re: Better go go shell

I have. I tried it (some years ago) and it just about pulled in every dependency on the internet. Okay, I’m exaggerating a bit here, but at that time it needed so many dependencies that I immediately stopped using it myself. Now that might have changed, or maybe Guillaume’s new project is

Re: Better go go shell

The main reason is that the Karaf specific way of writing commands, on which completion depends, had been rejected years ago by the community. The new attempt I'm proposing has the benefit of being completely independent about how the command are actually written. You can add completion for

Re: Better go go shell

Thanks! On 11/3/15, 2:36 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" wrote: >The main reason is that the Karaf specific way of writing commands, on >which completion depends, had been rejected years ago by the community. > >The new attempt I'm proposing has the benefit of being completely