On 08/08/12 00:11, Steve Morris wrote:
Just my 2 cents worth. Businesses with a heavy investment in office
can't migrate to LO, as LO is not a functional replacement for office
2002,
IMHO that's not true
let alone 2010. A lot of business functionality that is used from day
to day and is
Hi :)
I have forwarded this to the marketing team for them to discuss because there
are a lot of the BoD on that list. However i am far more unpopular there than
i am on this list so they will probably just ignore it as trolling or
some-such.
If, like me, you want to see LO succeed and
Felmon,
I find your attitude towards discussion worth a respect. I wish everyone would
do as you do.
I think we agree in most of points.
I would only like to comment this part:
On 07/08/2012 at 18:58, Felmon Davis dav...@union.edu wrote:
I find this an absurd criterion of proof. there are
On 07/08/2012 at 21:39, Andrew Brager apb3...@bak.rr.com wrote:
however the argument falls a bit short when he states
using translation software isn't allowed (my interpretation of his
comment without using translation software).
It's just I wouldn't believe translation provided by software
has the file possibly been made read-only or locked?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steve Morris samor...@netspace.net.auwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to reproduce spreadsheets created at work in Excel 2002 in
Libreoffice 3.6 under Linux and can't do it because pivottables and charts
Brian, the definitions you've pulled are from the legal industry ;-)
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.comwrote:
At 12:39 07/08/2012 -0700, Andrew Brager wrote:
Yet, it fails to answer my original question which is where do the words
register true
Are you sure you want to use that particular font? ...
a different one might give you the look you desire, or you could
change the size of the super-/sub-scripts ...
I've found that's the only way to get fonts to behave the way I want
them to so do ...
for the
On 08/08/2012 03:57 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 08/08/12 00:11, Steve Morris wrote:
Just my 2 cents worth. Businesses with a heavy investment in office
can't migrate to LO, as LO is not a functional replacement for office
2002,
IMHO that's not true
let alone 2010. A lot of
Thank you for reply. I did try different fonts but havent found one that
really works. The subscripts do not even proportion consistently -they do
look normal in one of my slide.
On Aug 8, 2012 9:16 AM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure you want to use that particular
Gordon, you're correct, but trying to convince many - especially
businesses - of this logic, can be next to impossible ;-)
For some reason, the training is done on MSFT machines with MSFT
programs and the idea of change is scary even if this change will protect
their machines from
Tom, well done.
Maybe those at LO will listen, but I don't know what more they could
do;
the problem probably originates from the States due to the
massive use of MSFT products ... hackers attack these ... MSFT responds
with their endless stream of fixes ... hackers
The Report Builder extension permits two types of output: a text document, and a
spreadsheet. Using LO 3.5.5.3, I can create a report selecting the layout as a
spreadsheet. When I execute the report, I only get a layout in a spreadsheet; I do not get
any data. Is there a problem here? Has
Liang, you're correct; this is a problem about which too few of us
care, I guess.
Maybe they will understand what we're saying ... and find a solution
for us ;-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Liang Wang frank0...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for reply. I did try different fonts
On 08/08/2012 10:10 AM, anne-ology wrote:
Tom, well done.
Maybe those at LO will listen, but I don't know what more they could
do;
the problem probably originates from the States due to the
massive use of MSFT products ... hackers attack these ... MSFT responds
with
I am working on a Windows desktop that has 3.4.x [.5 or .6] on it.
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This very slow removal is also
Jay, you're speaking logically; too few people today seem to think
logically - or to even think ;-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/08/2012 10:10 AM, anne-ology wrote:
Tom, well done.
Maybe those at LO will listen, but I
While I've traditionally used google translate, somehow I ended up at
Bing translate.
Bing says:
It is a remarkable admiration
So it pays to shop around.
On 8/8/2012 5:32 AM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 07/08/2012 at 21:39, Andrew Brager apb3...@bak.rr.com wrote:
however the argument falls
I have a list of measured times in [H]:MM:SS format and I would like to sum
them. If I put in a formula:
= B2+B3+B4+B5
it works, but if I try:
=Sum(B2:B5)
I get 00:00:00 as a result. What am I missing?
I have tried both LibO 3.5.5.3 and 3.6.0.4
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
On 8/7/2012 7:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 12:39 07/08/2012 -0700, Andrew Brager wrote:
Yet, it fails to answer my original question which is where do the
words register true come from, and to extend and clarify the
question - how did register true come to mean aligning baselines?
I think
teknow wrote:
I have a list of measured times in [H]:MM:SS format and I would like to sum
them. If I put in a formula:
= B2+B3+B4+B5
it works, but if I try:
=Sum(B2:B5)
I get 00:00:00 as a result. What am I missing?
I have tried both LibO 3.5.5.3 and 3.6.0.4
Thanks.
Did you format
2012/8/8 teknow teknowledg...@gmail.com:
I have a list of measured times in [H]:MM:SS format and I would like to sum
them. If I put in a formula:
= B2+B3+B4+B5
it works, but if I try:
=Sum(B2:B5)
I get 00:00:00 as a result. What am I missing?
Exactly how did you enter those time
2012/8/8 Dan elderdanle...@gmail.com:
teknow wrote:
I have a list of measured times in [H]:MM:SS format and I would like to
sum
them. If I put in a formula:
= B2+B3+B4+B5
it works, but if I try:
=Sum(B2:B5)
I get 00:00:00 as a result. What am I missing?
I have tried both LibO
On 08/08/12 15:01, anne-ology wrote:
Gordon, you're correct, but trying to convince many - especially
businesses - of this logic, can be next to impossible ;-)
The problem doesn't seem to be so much with management not wanting to
change - it seems to be with fear of the IT dept. Many
I have two questions on LibreOffice
3.6.0. First, when I go to the Macro in Calc
(Tools – Macros) the record macro function is no longer there. I
can run existing macros, I just cannot find where to create new ones.
Where do I go to create new one?
Second, in writer I used to be able to
on my dell latitude 6510, opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice
3.5:build-403 Build ID: 350m1(Build:403), font liberation serif,
printer samsung CLP-320N
using writer, when I print, sometimes and often, the first letter of a
chapter or of the table is wrong, wrong means that is an unreadable
2012/8/8 Jeff Hahn kr...@hotmail.com:
I have two questions on LibreOffice
3.6.0. First, when I go to the Macro in Calc
(Tools – Macros) the record macro function is no longer there.
I have LibreOffice 3.5.5.3 and there is no record macro option there
either. Seems that they gave up that
Record new macros.
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 21:22:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Libreoffice 3.6
From: gurus.knu...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
2012/8/8 Jeff Hahn kr...@hotmail.com:
I have two questions on LibreOffice
3.6.0. First, when I go to the Macro
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 21:22 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2012/8/8 Jeff Hahn kr...@hotmail.com:
I have two questions on LibreOffice
3.6.0. First, when I go to the Macro in Calc
(Tools – Macros) the record macro function is no longer there.
I have LibreOffice 3.5.5.3 and there is
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Jeff Hahn kr...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have two questions on LibreOffice
3.6.0. First, when I go to the Macro in Calc
(Tools – Macros) the record macro function is no longer there. I
can run existing macros, I just cannot find where to create new ones.
On 2012-08-08 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This very slow removal
On 08/08/2012 01:39 PM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 08/08/12 15:01, anne-ology wrote:
Gordon, you're correct, but trying to convince many - especially
businesses - of this logic, can be next to impossible ;-)
The problem doesn't seem to be so much with management not wanting to
Hi anne-ology,
*
*
*I just realized that the strange behavior of sub-/superscripts is caused
by the automatic adjustment of text box when you choose fit to frame.
Remove that tick and manually set the appropriate font will get everything
look good!!!*
*
*
*well, after so many diggs...*
*
*
*Liang*
Jay Lozier wrote:
When MS introduced Win95 they were well positioned to implement a good
GUI for MSOffice, they had already do it once on the Mac.
Check out Novell vs Microsoft for info on how Microsoft used hidden API
on Windows to ensure their apps worked better than the competition.
Thanks for the responses.
I'm being given an already filled-out .xlsx, but I'm not seeing a difference
if I save it to .ods.
The cells are identified as in H:MM format, but the actual measurements are
in minutes and seconds (with a few H:MM:SS sprinkled in). It's a bit
confusing because what I
On 08/08/2012 03:49 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB
2012/8/8 teknow teknowledg...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the responses.
I'm being given an already filled-out .xlsx, but I'm not seeing a difference
if I save it to .ods.
The cells are identified as in H:MM format, but the actual measurements are
in minutes and seconds (with a few H:MM:SS
95On 08/08/2012 03:59 PM, James Knott wrote:
Jay Lozier wrote:
When MS introduced Win95 they were well positioned to implement a
good GUI for MSOffice, they had already do it once on the Mac.
Check out Novell vs Microsoft for info on how Microsoft used hidden
API on Windows to ensure their
Sounds a lot like the battered wife syndrome.
steve
On 2012-08-09 02:10, anne-ology wrote:
Tom, well done.
Maybe those at LO will listen, but I don't know what more they could
do;
the problem probably originates from the States due to the
massive use of MSFT
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
Felmon,
I find your attitude towards discussion worth a respect. I wish everyone would
do as you do.
thank you! danke! Dziękuję!
I think we agree in most of points.
I would only like to comment this part:
On 07/08/2012 at 18:58, Felmon Davis
On 09/08/12 00:56, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 08/08/2012 10:10 AM, anne-ology wrote:
Tom, well done.
Maybe those at LO will listen, but I don't know what more
they could
do;
the problem probably originates from the States due to the
massive use of MSFT products ...
Back in 1973, I had was working in the US on a camera-ready book
composition, and I was given the Pocket Pal, a graphic artsproduction
handbook, from International Paper Company (10th edition (1970), 3rd
printing, rev. January 1973. (the original edition is 1934) as a
reference book for
On 08/08/12 22:52, anne-ology wrote:
has the file possibly been made read-only or locked?
No, I have these problems irrespective of whether I try to work in an
existing excel spreadsheet or have Calc create a new odf spreadsheet and
work in that. The excel spreadsheets are normally
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
The problem doesn't seem to be so much with management not wanting to change
- it seems to be with fear of the IT dept.
There are very sound reasons that businesses are conservative. Businesses
don't like change because change costs
When at home it is a case of using LO but when at work and school it is
a matter of using Mo as that is what everybody else uses.
I prefer to use LO for the simplicity that it has attached with it. I
remember being taught as a 5 year old to use MO 2003 and becoming quite
proficient in its use.
yes, I've determined all needs to be done manually ;-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Liang Wang frank0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi anne-ology,
*
*
*I just realized that the strange behavior of sub-/superscripts is caused
by the automatic adjustment of text box when you choose fit to
Tod, you're correct;
although the businesses fail to consider the cost of
safeguarding their machines;
a cost which would be considerably reduced by not using the
MSFT products.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:26 PM, T Hopkins hopl...@hillmanncarr.com wrote:
On Aug 8,
Hi Pier,
Le 2012-08-08 14:41, yahoo-pier_andreit a écrit :
on my dell latitude 6510, opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice
3.5:build-403 Build ID: 350m1(Build:403), font liberation serif, printer
samsung CLP-320N
using writer, when I print, sometimes and often, the first letter of a
chapter or
On 2012-08-09 13:00, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Pier,
Le 2012-08-08 14:41, yahoo-pier_andreit a écrit :
on my dell latitude 6510, opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice
3.5:build-403 Build ID: 350m1(Build:403), font liberation serif, printer
samsung CLP-320N
using writer, when I print, sometimes and
Hi Steve et al,
Le 2012-08-08 21:12, Steve Edmonds a écrit :
On 2012-08-09 13:00, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Pier,
Le 2012-08-08 14:41, yahoo-pier_andreit a écrit :
on my dell latitude 6510, opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice
3.5:build-403 Build ID: 350m1(Build:403), font liberation serif,
Hi,
thanks for the hints where to find the macro recorder in 3.5.5.
to me, its a very useful to tool and helped a lot, to learn how macros work.
In some cases its the only chance to get something work by use of the
dispatcher.
Please keep it in the future.
Walther
Am Mittwoch, 8. August
50 matches
Mail list logo
