Il 06/11/2013 00:09, Kracked_P_P---webmaster ha scritto:
On 11/05/2013 05:27 PM, jonathon wrote:
On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why do you think you need a 64bit version?
Because one is running a 64 bit operating system.
jonathon
Yes, I am running several 64-bit Windows systems,
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:51 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-11-05 7:47 AM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Still having the same issue on:
Version: 4.1.1.2
Build ID: 410m0(Build:2)
Why would you
Il 06/11/2013 11:45, Tom Davies ha scritto:
Hi :)
Of course 32bit version can run on a 64bit OS. So it means the 1
version is able to run on a wider range of machines. If there was to be
a 64bit version it would need the machine and the OS to also be 64bit
but the 32bit version can run on any
Hi :)
Of course 32bit version can run on a 64bit OS. So it means the 1 version
is able to run on a wider range of machines. If there was to be a 64bit
version it would need the machine and the OS to also be 64bit but the 32bit
version can run on any combination.
OTH almost all newer machines
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:13 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:51 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-11-05 7:47 AM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org
wrote:
Still having the same issue on:
Don Myers:
Some of the things Microsoft has done are chronicled here in a report
to the European Commission a number of years ago:
One cannot hold in a smile while reading that whine. In particular, the
Wordstar case of 'shell namespace extensions', which a text processor (Even
MS Office
Urmas wrote:
So you've just made that malarkey up? Wow.
He is correct in saying MS did a lot of things to cripple competition.
That AARD code was one. They also used hidden API as was revealed when
Borland sued them and more. They have a very long history of playing
dirty, up to and including
On 2013-11-05 5:27 PM, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why do you think you need a 64bit version?
Because one is running a 64 bit operating system.
Then you don't understand how these things work...
Pretty much all 64bit Operating Systems
James Knott:
That AARD code was one. They also used hidden API as was revealed when
Borland sued them and more.
'AARD code' was not in any retail version of Windows. It is fake.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
The strange thing is that LO 4.0.5 on the same system shows both Calibri and
Calibri Light in the drop down. 4.1.3.2 shows only Calibri so something
changed in 4.1.3.2. G.
On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:56 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 11/05/2013 05:21 PM, c...@intergate.com wrote:
On 11/05/2013 06:51 PM, Pedro wrote:
krackedpress wrote
The next thing people will insist on is LO being designed to run on all
2, 4, 6, or even 8 cores of the CPU at the same time to make it even
faster.
Do you really think it makes sense that Calc and Base are not prepared to
use all the
On 11/05/2013 08:21 PM, c...@intergate.com wrote:
Quoting NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
On 11/05/2013 06:53 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
23:00:26 -0800
On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from Cliff
2013/11/6 Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To be honest, number crunching on a GPU is better than a CPU, since GPUs
were designed to number crunch. Look at the newer CUDA and ATI GPU
cards. They have 32, 64, 128, 512, or more cores or streams. There
is a movement to
On 11/05/2013 05:15 PM, jonathon wrote:
n 11/05/2013 02:01 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Can I just add these lines to that file?
draw:color draw:name=Gold 1 draw:color=#FFD700/
draw:color draw:name=Gold 2 draw:color=#EEC900/
draw:color draw:name=Gold 3 draw:color=#CDAD00/
On 11/06/2013 11:18 AM, Gabriel Risterucci wrote:
2013/11/6 Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To be honest, number crunching on a GPU is better than a CPU, since GPUs
were designed to number crunch. Look at the newer CUDA and ATI GPU
cards. They have 32, 64, 128, 512, or
I will try to put the question again:
I am trying to find out if there is a hyphenation module for LibreOffice for
the Chinese language (traditional and/or simplyfied). Can any of you direct me
towards someone who can answer this question?
Thanks in advance
Per Larsen
-Original
2013/11/6 Per Hyttel Larsen p...@ccieurope.com
I will try to put the question again:
I am trying to find out if there is a hyphenation module for LibreOffice
for the Chinese language (traditional and/or simplyfied). Can any of you
direct me towards someone who can answer this question?
Urmas wrote:
James Knott:
That AARD code was one. They also used hidden API as was revealed when
Borland sued them and more.
'AARD code' was not in any retail version of Windows. It is fake.
Well, you 'd better thel that to the guys at DR-DOS and also those in
the antitrust case, as
Per Hyttel Larsen:
I am trying to find out if there is a hyphenation module for LibreOffice for
the Chinese language (traditional and/or simplyfied). Can any of you direct
me towards someone who can answer this question?
There cannot be a hyphenation module for Chinese language, as the
Hi,
Kracked_P_P---webmaster schrieb:
[..]
I could work on creating a standard.soc file that contains all of
these colors. I have just over 500 color names and hex codes, though
100 are levels of gray.
If someone would like a text file list of these colors, I can send them
a copy.
I may, when
2013/11/6 Urmas davian...@gmail.com
Per Hyttel Larsen:
I am trying to find out if there is a hyphenation module for LibreOffice
for the Chinese language (traditional and/or simplyfied). Can any of you
direct me towards someone who can answer this question?
There cannot be a hyphenation
On 11/6/2013 12:59 PM, Urmas wrote:
James Knott:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
Quote:
Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1
It's a myth.
But they didn't remove it and it could always be reenabled by changing a
single byte of machine code.
--
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:44:11AM +0700, Urmas wrote:
Paul:
Microsoft, as the developers of the
OS, put code in their OS to capture the Ctrl+J key combination, and not
pass it on to the foreground application. However, they also put in
code to allow an application to request that the key
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote:
James Knott:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
Quote:
Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1
It's a myth.
What is a myth, that Microsoft disabled the AARD code? :P
The AARD code is
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote:
James Knott:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AARD_code
Quote:
Microsoft disabled the AARD code for the final release of Windows 3.1
It's a myth.
Do you actually work for mickeyshaft seems that way you are backing them
If he's not being paid by MS, he should be...
But he's a well known troll around these parts, move along folks.
Unless there's useful info in the response, then it's worth spreading.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:02:55 +
P NIKOLIC p.nikol...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:59:33 +0700
On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 11/05/2013 08:21 PM, c...@intergate.com wrote:
Quoting NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
On 11/05/2013 06:53 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
In Libreoffice Base The Form Design window, I was trying to get it where
the cursor starts in the first field. Right now it is in the top left
corner at start up (data entry) like it is when I go into form edit
mode. In exploring ways to do this I had clicked on an icon called
Automatic
Hi.
I am trying to find and replace some text with regex in calc. Can anyone
help with how I make it non-greedy.
I tried \([:digit:].*?[:digit:]\) in place of \([:digit:].*[:digit:]\)
but both are greedy. When the following (12-34-23) cat (233) is in a
selected cell it replaces both instances
\([:digit:].*?[:digit:]\)
works as non-greedy for me (two replacements), and just .* as greedy (1
repl.) for your example.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines
At 16:55 07/11/2013 +1300, Steve Edmonds wrote:
I am trying to find and replace some text with regex in calc. Can
anyone help with how I make it non-greedy.
I think the answer is that you don't: you must find a way of
constructing a suitable expression despite such expressions being greedy.
El 2013-11-05 05:51 p.m., Pedro escribió:
krackedpress wrote
The next thing people will insist on is LO being designed to run on all
2, 4, 6, or even 8 cores of the CPU at the same time to make it even
faster.
Do you really think it makes sense that Calc and Base are not prepared to
use all
Greetings
Is there a list of willing helpers.
Thanks in advance.
Bill
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
On 2013-11-07 18:23, Brian Barker wrote:
At 16:55 07/11/2013 +1300, Steve Edmonds wrote:
I am trying to find and replace some text with regex in calc. Can
anyone help with how I make it non-greedy.
I think the answer is that you don't: you must find a way of
constructing a suitable
At 19:55 07/11/2013 +1300, Steve Edmonds wrote:
On 2013-11-07 18:23, Brian Barker wrote:
At 16:55 07/11/2013 +1300, Steve Edmonds wrote:
I am trying to find and replace some text with regex in calc. Can
anyone help with how I make it non-greedy.
I think the answer is that you don't: you must
Hi
Your supposedly non-greedy match is definitely non-greedy here. I have
to hit Replace twice on your example input.
What version of LibreOffice are you using? Non-greedy matches are
supported only from 4.0 upwards. So if you are still on 3.x line, then
you are out of luck (or simply upgrade,
36 matches
Mail list logo
