RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread Richard
-Original Message- From: Roland Hughes [mailto:rol...@logikalsolutions.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:23 PM To: users@libreoffice.org Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken Richard, If actual IT professionals set up the server correctly, you send

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 6:08 PM, Tom Davies wrote: If rules are set-up to alienate new users then i think they are worth ignoring. Your attitude is why many people look on your posts with disdain, Tom. It also sets up a false premise. The rule is not set up to alienate new users, and as long as people

RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread Roland Hughes
] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:23 PM To: users@libreoffice.org Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken Richard, If actual IT professionals set up the server correctly, you send a COMPLETELY EMPTY MESSAGE to users+h...@libreoffice.org No SIG files, no subject

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread Gene Young
On 5/31/2011 10:09 AM, Roland Hughes wrote: Richard, Specifying Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org messages as junk/spam ON THE EMAIL SERVER will stop them from ever being downloaded! Roland As it will for rol...@logikalsolutions.com. PLONK -- Gene Young -- Unsubscribe instructions:

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/05/2011 21:42, Sigrid Carrera wrote: If you're going to a football match, you do obey the rules for the game, you don't make up your own rules, Supposedly, both rugby and Australian rules football got started that way. jonathon - -- If

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-31 Thread Tom Davies
: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/05/2011 21:42, Sigrid Carrera wrote: If you're going to a football match, you do obey the rules for the game, you don't make up your own rules, Supposedly, both rugby and Australian rules

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Joep L. Blom
On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a whole lot of trouble for doing it. Now, people who once got paid for writing a program or use Microsoft

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Roland Hughes
I don't know if you are having difficulties with your mail client, but your recent responses seem to be double posting. On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 17:19 +0200, Joep L. Blom wrote: On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tom Davies
: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a whole lot of trouble for doing it. Now, people who

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Simos Xenitellis
: Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com Sent: Mon, 30 May, 2011 16:19:09 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because when you go through a SOX audit

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tom Davies
@libreoffice.org Cc: Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com Sent: Mon, 30 May, 2011 16:19:09 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because when you go through

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 12:17 PM, Tom Davies wrote: A LOT of people top-post. Particularly normal office workers. Yeah, because they're typically a bunch of lazy bums... Most email clients seem to default to open emails at the top of the email. Not sure that's true (I know Thunderbirds default is to

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 11:42 AM, Roland Hughes wrote: Editing and/or responding within the original message is considered tampering with evidence. Rotflmao even harder! Roland, where do you get this garbage? Do you make it up as you go? Everyone is supposed to TOP POST, not only to save developer

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread planas
Hi, On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 10:42 -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: Editing and/or responding within the original message is considered tampering with evidence. Everyone is supposed to TOP POST, not only to save developer time, but to allow the legal teams to read from the bottom up on the last

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Roland Hughes
You have just demonstrated a complete lack of understanding about IT and have __obviously__ never ever found yourself in the middle of a multi-million dollar lawsuit between two massive corporations. If you had you would never speak so far out your rectal orifice in public. I have been in that

RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Richard
...@neuroweave.nl] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:19 AM To: users@libreoffice.org Cc: Roland Hughes Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because when you go

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 3:05 PM, Roland Hughes wrote: You have just demonstrated a complete lack of understanding about IT and have __obviously__ never ever found yourself in the middle of a multi-million dollar lawsuit between two massive corporations. Objection, your honor, relevancy - the one has

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 3:13 PM, planas wrote: From what I understand, top posting is generally preferred for general business communication. The problem with bottom posting is that one must scroll done to see the answer and there is a tendency to edit the text, which may be unacceptable in court.

RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Roland Hughes
- From: Joep L. Blom [mailto:jlb...@neuroweave.nl] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:19 AM To: users@libreoffice.org Cc: Roland Hughes Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: Joep, Professional IT workers never remove

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 4:22 PM, Roland Hughes wrote: Open your browser without your email client being opened and go to that Web page. Find messages from rol...@logikalsolutions.com and flag them as junk mail. There fixed that for you... And you're welcome... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tom Davies
Wow, somewhere in there i see an admittance that it is marginally easier to top-post. At last. Regards from Tom :) From: Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org To: users@libreoffice.org Sent: Mon, 30 May, 2011 19:54:50 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-30 5:10 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Wow, somewhere in there i see an admittance that it is marginally easier to top-post. At last. I don't recall anyone ever saying it wasn't *easier*... It is also *easier* to steal apples from your neighbors apple tree than it is to grow your own...

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Sigrid Carrera
Hi, On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:05:56 -0500 Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com wrote: You have just demonstrated a complete lack of understanding about IT and have __obviously__ never ever found yourself in the middle of a multi-million dollar lawsuit between two massive corporations. If

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Sigrid Carrera
Roland, On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:22:44 -0500 Roland Hughes rol...@logikalsolutions.com wrote: Richard, If actual IT professionals set up the server correctly, you send a COMPLETELY EMPTY MESSAGE to users+h...@libreoffice.org No SIG files, no subject, no message body. Given the

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Tom Davies
that didn't follow it? Regards from Tom :) From: Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com To: users@libreoffice.org Sent: Mon, 30 May, 2011 22:42:47 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken Hi, On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:05:56 -0500 Roland

RE: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken [ ... ] In your office, you can do as you want. But on this list, we have a set of rules, that everyone should take into account. And one of this rules, is to not top post, but reply *below* the paragraph your referring

Re: [libreoffice-users] OTRe: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

2011-05-30 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi, Am 30.05.2011 23:42, schrieb Sigrid Carrera: In your office, you can do as you want. But on this list, we have a set of rules, that everyone should take into account. And one of this rules, is to not top post, but reply *below* the paragraph your referring to and deleting the stuff,