Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread jorge
Hi:

It would be about the amount memory assigned in Calc (Menu: Tools-
Options - Memory)

Regards,

Jorge Rodríguez 

El lun, 04-08-2014 a las 22:25 -0500, Gregory Forster escribió:
 Hi,
 
  I haven't been on this users group for over two years, primarily 
 because everything worked great, until now.  I have an inconsistent and 
 not often issue with Calc.  Well, it's more annoying than anything else, 
 because I can easily correct it, but it shouldn't be.  Calc does weird 
 things now and then.  I was creating an elaborate spreadsheet file 
 consisting of 13 worksheets to record my wife's and mine different Roth 
 and Traditional IRAs vested in Mutual Funds.  Each worksheet shows the 
 DATE, transaction DESCRIPTION, DEBIT, CREDIT, share PRICE, SHAREs 
 obtained, share BALANCE, $ AMOUNT (share PRICE * share BALANCE), 
 percentage of gain or loss both yearly and per investment, all in 
 separate columns.  Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a cell, and 
 press the Enter or Down Arrow key.  My calculation will disappear and a 
 ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to check 
 a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will 
 disappear and a : will reside in that cell.  Sometimes, I'll just move 
 an arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever 
 I move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key.
 
  As I said, these issues are very inconsistent.  They may not happen 
 for days, then after a few days, they may happen several times, then 
 intermittent, or not at all.  This all started in early July.  I ran 
 anti-malware scanners, anti-virus scanners, cleaned the registry, and 
 defragged.  I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs 4). I have 
 LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3 (which I am  
 currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever version used.
 
  I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he 
 reasoned (the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with 
 one or more simultaneous running programs.  I have installed some new 
 software, some with start up files.  Those software programs were not 
 really all that important, so I deleted them, the registry entries, and 
 any start up files.  However, the IRA spreadsheet file is all done, and 
 I don't know if I'll still have those issue until I start another 
 spreadsheet project.
 
  This is all done on an HP Probook 440 G1 14 notebook with a Jan 
 2014 UEFI, an Intel dual core I3 2.4Ghz Haswell, 4GB DDR3L, and Windows 
 7 64 bit home premium purchased late last March.
 
  My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?  Does my 
 reasoning sound feasible? Any ideas?
 
 Greg
 
 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com
 
 

-- 
Atentamente,

Jorge Rodríguez


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] question

2014-08-05 Thread Tomáš Matýs
Hi,
I am just curious when you update your google+ account, because last
massege is there from january. Maybe there is some problem with the
connection.

with the best regards,
Tomáš Matýs

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Brian Barker

At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:
I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc 
does weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a 
calculation in a cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My 
calculation will disappear and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I 
may randomly highlight a cell to check a formula, then when I press 
a directional arrow, my calculation will disappear and a : will 
reside in that cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an arrow key, or the 
mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever I move will 
highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all 
started in early July. [...] I changed different versions of 
LibreOffice (vs 4). I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 
4.1.2, and 4.0.3 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same 
issues with whichever version used.


I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned 
(the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one 
or more simultaneous running programs.


What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is 
improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for 
anyone else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? 
Perhaps you should sack your tech.



My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.


Does my reasoning sound feasible?


Nope.


Any ideas?


If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, 
it is very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on 
the particular application.

o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially 
those for the keyboard).

o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period to test.
o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing 
the trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this 
is possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a 
period. Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its 
sensitivity to test.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Sum of multiple cells substring

2014-08-05 Thread Daniel R. Miguel

Hi again,
I modified the formula to suit my spreadsheet to 
{=SUM(IF(LEFT(B46:AE46,2)=OT,VALUE(MID(B46:AE46,3,99)),0))}. It works 
beautifully but, in some instances it will render an Err:502.

One of said instances is this:
OT8 	HF8 	OT8 	OT2 	OT1 	OT0,5 	OT8 	OT8 	OT8 	OT5 	OT6 	OT5 	OT6 
OT5 	OT5 	OT8 	OT5 	OT6 	OT3 	OT8 	OT8 	OT4 	OT8 	OT8 	OT5 	OT1 	OT5 
OT4 	OT8 	OT8



Is the HF8 the one to blame?

Thanks again.

El 05/08/2014 a las #4, Brian Barker escribió:

At 17:38 04/08/2014 +0200, Daniel R. Miguel wrote:
I have a table with cells that may contain OTnum, so it might contain 
OT0.5, OT1, OT2, OT2.5 et cetera. I would want to sum the number 
substring of all the cells in a row, so for example if I have this row:

AlanOT0,5FOT1FVOT2FF   VOT3
I would have another column with the total sum of OT:
AlanOT0,5FOT1FVOT2FF   VOT3 6,5
(OT3+OT2+OT1+OT0.5)


Suppose those eleven items are cells A1 to K1. In the result cell, enter
=SUM(IF(LEFT(B1:K1,2)=OT,VALUE(MID(B1:K1,3,99)),0))
But don't press Enter or click the green tick mark; instead press 
Ctrl+Shift+Enter to render it an array formula. You will see that the 
entire formula displayed in the Input Line has been surrounded by 
braces - { } - but note that you cannot achieve the same result by 
typing these yourself.


You will presumably need to copy this formula down a column. If so, 
you appear to be able to achieve the correct result by copying the 
formula from the first cell and pasting it into others (even 
wholesale) or by using Edit | Fill, but not by dragging the fill handle.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker





--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Sum of multiple cells substring

2014-08-05 Thread Daniel R. Miguel

Hello again!

I realized the error was that the decimal point is a , (we are using 
Spanish localization), so changing the , for a . decimal point did the 
trick.


Once again, thank you a lot.
El 05/08/2014 a las #4, Daniel R. Miguel escribió:

Hi again,
I modified the formula to suit my spreadsheet to 
{=SUM(IF(LEFT(B46:AE46,2)=OT,VALUE(MID(B46:AE46,3,99)),0))}. It 
works beautifully but, in some instances it will render an Err:502.

One of said instances is this:
OT8 	HF8 	OT8 	OT2 	OT1 	OT0,5 	OT8 	OT8 	OT8 	OT5 	OT6 	OT5 	OT6 
OT5 	OT5 	OT8 	OT5 	OT6 	OT3 	OT8 	OT8 	OT4 	OT8 	OT8 	OT5 	OT1 
OT5 	OT4 	OT8 	OT8



Is the HF8 the one to blame?

Thanks again.

El 05/08/2014 a las #4, Brian Barker escribió:

At 17:38 04/08/2014 +0200, Daniel R. Miguel wrote:
I have a table with cells that may contain OTnum, so it might 
contain OT0.5, OT1, OT2, OT2.5 et cetera. I would want to sum the 
number substring of all the cells in a row, so for example if I have 
this row:

AlanOT0,5FOT1FVOT2FF   V OT3
I would have another column with the total sum of OT:
AlanOT0,5FOT1FVOT2FF   V OT3 6,5
(OT3+OT2+OT1+OT0.5)


Suppose those eleven items are cells A1 to K1. In the result cell, enter
=SUM(IF(LEFT(B1:K1,2)=OT,VALUE(MID(B1:K1,3,99)),0))
But don't press Enter or click the green tick mark; instead press 
Ctrl+Shift+Enter to render it an array formula. You will see that the 
entire formula displayed in the Input Line has been surrounded by 
braces - { } - but note that you cannot achieve the same result by 
typing these yourself.


You will presumably need to copy this formula down a column. If so, 
you appear to be able to achieve the correct result by copying the 
formula from the first cell and pasting it into others (even 
wholesale) or by using Edit | Fill, but not by dragging the fill handle.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker







--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Perhaps try renaming your User Profile?  Sudden change in behavior or weird
wonkiness might be down to something going wonky in the User Profile;
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile

Renaming the profile means you can still get back to it if it doesn't fix
things so it's a good way to get back to factory defaults.
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)



On 5 August 2014 07:58, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:

 At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:

 I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc does
 weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a
 cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will disappear
 and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to
 check a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will
 disappear and a : will reside in that cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an
 arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever I
 move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all
 started in early July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice
 (vs 4). I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3
 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever
 version used.


 I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned (the
 same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one or more
 simultaneous running programs.


 What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is
 improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for anyone
 else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? Perhaps you should
 sack your tech.


  My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


 I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.


  Does my reasoning sound feasible?


 Nope.

  Any ideas?


 If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, it is
 very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on the
 particular application.
 o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
 o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
 o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
 o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially those
 for the keyboard).
 o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period to
 test.
 o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing the
 trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this is
 possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a period.
 Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its sensitivity to test.

 I trust this helps.

 Brian Barker



 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
 unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Wolfgang Keller
 A database like MySQL and mariadb cache the updates and then write
 them to disk every 1/2 to full second (or however configured).  Seems
 like a good idea.

I wouldn't consider MySQL and its descendents as good references for
data integrity.
 
 So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to give
 the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file
 based, single file or multiple files.

That would only confuse most end users.

The point is that the developers should make the most reasonable
choice - Which is imho obviously to use exclusively an external
client-server RDBMS.

And since the driver for PostgreSQL already comes with LO that's the
best choice. PostgreSQL is legendary for its robustness. Besides
shipping with a reasonable default configuration for home use and
being perfectly scalable up to a multi-master cluster of mainframes.

The developers should rather focus their limited resources on fixing
bugs with the Base client side (forms, reports, etc.).

 Yes, I know that you can link to other back-end db's, but LO Base
 doesn't create those db's - that has to be done ahead of time by
 someone that is skilled with the particular db.

With PgAdmin (which comes with PostgreSQL) it's as simple as creating a
new document with LO.

Sincerely,

Wolfgang

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Wolfgang Keller
 As I recall, at the time of the release of OpenOffice2, it had to be
 like Access 

Braindead.

 - but of course, as Sun was mainly running the show, that
 meant that it had to be multi-OS, thus Java based

Bullshit. There are plenty of cross-platform RDBMSes that are not
implemented in this grotesque proprietary abomination that Java is.

 and a fairly simple, drop-in piece of code with an appropriate
 licence. One would do well to remember that at the time, the internal
 Sun Base development team only comprised about 3 members of staff
 working full-time on the project, thus resources were painfully
 limited.

Just yet another argument in favor of just providing a driver for a
client-server RDBMS.

Sincerely,

Wolfgang

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Rob Jasper

Op 4 aug. 2014, om 20:23 heeft Jean-Francois Nifenecker het volgende geschreven:

 Le 04/08/2014 18:59, dave boland a écrit :
 
 I'm getting a little confused.  My understanding is that there are
 really two issues here.  One is that LO Base is RAM resident - all
 updates are held in RAM until saved by the user, or the program is
 closed.  Correct?  If so, this situation will expose the user to data
 loss between saves.  
 
 There are two components here: the DB engine (eg HSQLDB) and the
 front-end (ie LO-Base).
 In embedded mode, running Base stats the DB engine and opens the wanted
 database. In this situation, yes, database updates are set to ram until
 the database is saved, either voluntarily or when Base is shut down.
 
 And yes, any flaw in *any* piece of software running while Base and the
 DB also run, can create DB loss.
 
It is important to separate embedded and incore. They are completely 
different things.
The important thing is that embedded means that the dbms is not independent of 
the application... That said, the db crashes when the app crashes and vice 
versa.

So, if a database runs 'as a service', listening to any incoming requests and 
serving them, then the database is separate. Yes, of course it can crash, but 
it should be impossible for the user or application to be the cause. 

Generally, for any dbms it should be top priority to keep data consistent. A 
dbms should be crash resistant, in that a transaction either is committed or is 
not, and not in any bogus state in between. 

In core, on the other hand means that (part of) the data is kept in core. That 
does not mean the db is not crash resistant, though.
Oracle incore database (used to be Times Ten and now an option) does keep the 
data in core, but saves all change actions in a redo-log. Upon restarting after 
a crash the redo-log is executed so the database is back in the latest 
committed state. The same process is used for backup procedures.
So, in that case one has the speed of incore, while the persistency of disk 
based. 

 
 The other issue is that LO Base uses an embedded database, which means
 that the data files and the GUI, reports, etc. are combined into one
 file that can be corrupted.  The suggestion is to use a split system
 where the data files are separate from the other files.  Correct?  If
 so, at best, the data may be a little safer, but forms, queries, etc.
 can still be corrupted.
 
 Yes, this is what split-mode is all about.
 
 
 A database like MySQL and mariadb cache the updates and then write them
 to disk every 1/2 to full second (or however configured).  Seems like a
 good idea.
 
 So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to give
 the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file based,
 single file or multiple files.  Would that be difficult to do?
 
 WRT HSQL it's just a couple settings away:
 
 (1) in LO global settings (Tools/Options, Advanced page) specify where
 the external HSQLDB engine is stored (Class Path button)
   - Add archive: points to the hsqldb.jar
   - Add Folder: points to the directory where hsqldb.jar is stored
 (lib dir)
 
   Then make sure to check the test button
 
   These setings are stored in the user profile /config directory.
 
 (2) in Base, DB creation wizard
   - at step 1 : select JDBC database
   - at step 2 : specify the DB address settings
  Datasource URL :
 hsqldb:file:d:/somedir/mybase/basetest;default_schema=true;shutdown=true;hsqldb.default_table_type=cached;get_column_name=false
  JDBC Driver class: org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver
 
   Test with the Test Class button.
 
   These settings are stored in the RegistryModifications.xcu file.
 
 
 To me, the main difficulty lies in the backup of these settings (config
 dir and RegistryModifications.xcu and the .odb file), so that you may
 change PC without hassle. Unless I'm missing the obvious, it is not the
 case currently.
 
 -- 
 Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
 


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Jon Harringdon
Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:

  So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to give
  the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file
  based, single file or multiple files.
 
 That would only confuse most end users.

Hear, hear.

 The point is that the developers should make the most reasonable
 choice

This mindset will not help LO broaden its user base. Users (even if most
are apparently deemed stupid by some) should be in the driving seat and
not some anonymous developers.

Pip Coburn writes this about the tech industry: I believe that users
are always in charge and that supply is a necessary but not sufficient
condition for commercial success. Companies and products geared toward
this holistic user orientation will succeed at far greater rates than
those stuck in a supplier-oriented mind-set. As far as I'm concerned
that hits the nail squarely on the head.

And as to confusing users with complex choices... a well-designed system
can be simple for simple needs and complex for complex needs.

One-size-fits-all rarely fits anyone.

IMHO etc.

Jon

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
+1

I think Base nearly does do the best way around.  The only problem is that
the easiest thing, the embedded database, is currently dangerously broken.
 The devs appear to be addressing that although, obviously, they can't fix
the whole thing all at one go.  The first step seems reasonably well chosen
to get the main bulk away from java.

I'm sure Java didn't used to be so awful.  It seems to have nose-dived
since Oracle took over but maybe that is preparation for monetising it and
that is a reasonable thing for a profit-making company to want to do.

It's like the story of the scorpion and the fox crossing a river.  The
scorpion stings the fox and as they both sink the fox asks why.  The
scorpion replies that it's his nature to sting and he can't help it.  So
can we really blame a profit-making company from attempting to subvert a
free product it owns in order to later be able to sell an enterprise or
professional version?

It's a shame openJava can't escape and gather a huge community as
LibreOffice did back when OpenOffice was owned by Oracle.


Base currently allows users to start of by using an internal back-end and
then move it to an external tool when they are ready.  [shrugs]  Seems a
good plan to me.
Regards from
Tom :)




On 5 August 2014 13:33, Jon Harringdon jonathan.harring...@virgin.net
wrote:

 Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:

   So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to give
   the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file
   based, single file or multiple files.
 
  That would only confuse most end users.

 Hear, hear.

  The point is that the developers should make the most reasonable
  choice

 This mindset will not help LO broaden its user base. Users (even if most
 are apparently deemed stupid by some) should be in the driving seat and
 not some anonymous developers.

 Pip Coburn writes this about the tech industry: I believe that users
 are always in charge and that supply is a necessary but not sufficient
 condition for commercial success. Companies and products geared toward
 this holistic user orientation will succeed at far greater rates than
 those stuck in a supplier-oriented mind-set. As far as I'm concerned
 that hits the nail squarely on the head.

 And as to confusing users with complex choices... a well-designed system
 can be simple for simple needs and complex for complex needs.

 One-size-fits-all rarely fits anyone.

 IMHO etc.

 Jon

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Jon Harringdon
Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think Base nearly does do the best way around.  The only problem is that
 the easiest thing, the embedded database, is currently dangerously broken.
  The devs appear to be addressing that although, obviously, they can't fix
 the whole thing all at one go.  The first step seems reasonably well chosen
 to get the main bulk away from java.
 
 I'm sure Java didn't used to be so awful.  It seems to have nose-dived
 since Oracle took over but maybe that is preparation for monetising it and
 that is a reasonable thing for a profit-making company to want to do.

My criticism was not at all directed specifically against Base as I
don't know the first thing about it. It was rather directed against the
idea that developers know better than users. They rarely, if ever, do,
IMHO.

Users have a zillion creative ways of (mis-)using a product, many of
them undreamt-of by its developers. So the more user choice and less
developer diktat a product exhibits, the better it is, in general.

I avoid Java as much as I possibly can (read: always) but my argument
has nothing whatsoever to do with Java.

Jon

 
 On 5 August 2014 13:33, Jon Harringdon jonathan.harring...@virgin.net
 wrote:
 
  Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
 
So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to give
the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file
based, single file or multiple files.
  
   That would only confuse most end users.
 
  Hear, hear.
 
   The point is that the developers should make the most reasonable
   choice
 
  This mindset will not help LO broaden its user base. Users (even if most
  are apparently deemed stupid by some) should be in the driving seat and
  not some anonymous developers.
 
  Pip Coburn writes this about the tech industry: I believe that users
  are always in charge and that supply is a necessary but not sufficient
  condition for commercial success. Companies and products geared toward
  this holistic user orientation will succeed at far greater rates than
  those stuck in a supplier-oriented mind-set. As far as I'm concerned
  that hits the nail squarely on the head.
 
  And as to confusing users with complex choices... a well-designed system
  can be simple for simple needs and complex for complex needs.
 
  One-size-fits-all rarely fits anyone.
 
  IMHO etc.
 
  Jon
 
  --
  To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
  Problems?
  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
  Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
  List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
  All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
  deleted
 
 

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Schema in Calc

2014-08-05 Thread Paul
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:45:20 +0200
Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Le 31/07/2014 00:08, Paul a écrit :
  Just out of interest, why would a db driver come into play? This is
  a spreadsheet we're talking about.
  
  The mention of db schema was merely to ask why Calc doesn't have
  something like it.
  
 
 How else would one obtain the schema in the first place ? 

I believe one of us is misunderstanding things. My understanding is
that the OP didn't actually want a database schema, he just wanted
something similar for normal spreadsheets.

So basically, create normal spreadsheet from scratch, develop it over
time to do some fancy calculations on multiple worksheets (or maybe
even only one). Then, sometime later, want to make changes, but
being unsure of what effects those changes will have in terms of other
formulae relying on cells you want to modify, you would like some sort
of outline of how all the data in the spreadhseet interacts.

At no point in this is a database ever introduced. The word schema
makes one think of a database, but I think the OP only used it to say he
wanted something like it. He doesn't actually want a database schema.

Now for spreadsheets, as they store unstructured data whereas databases
store structured data, a schema-like outline would be well-nigh
impossible to generate. But some sort of filterable listing of formulae
would help a lot with the above scenario, and is what I have proposed.

I think this should be a feature request for Calc, personally.

Paul

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Schema in Calc

2014-08-05 Thread Pat Brown
Thank you, Paul. I have followed the convolutions of the discussion with
interest but you have more clearly presented what I tried to say in the
beginning. After much of the discussion I now see many of the difficulties
involved but I will follow your suggestion and see if I can phrase this
clearly enough to present it as a Calc feature request.
  I must express my thanks to all who contributed. It is this type of
interaction that can lead to a more useful product.

Paddy


On 5 August 2014 16:15, Paul paulste...@afrihost.co.za wrote:

 On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:45:20 +0200
 Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:

  Le 31/07/2014 00:08, Paul a écrit :
   Just out of interest, why would a db driver come into play? This is
   a spreadsheet we're talking about.
  
   The mention of db schema was merely to ask why Calc doesn't have
   something like it.
  
 
  How else would one obtain the schema in the first place ?

 I believe one of us is misunderstanding things. My understanding is
 that the OP didn't actually want a database schema, he just wanted
 something similar for normal spreadsheets.

 So basically, create normal spreadsheet from scratch, develop it over
 time to do some fancy calculations on multiple worksheets (or maybe
 even only one). Then, sometime later, want to make changes, but
 being unsure of what effects those changes will have in terms of other
 formulae relying on cells you want to modify, you would like some sort
 of outline of how all the data in the spreadhseet interacts.

 At no point in this is a database ever introduced. The word schema
 makes one think of a database, but I think the OP only used it to say he
 wanted something like it. He doesn't actually want a database schema.

 Now for spreadsheets, as they store unstructured data whereas databases
 store structured data, a schema-like outline would be well-nigh
 impossible to generate. But some sort of filterable listing of formulae
 would help a lot with the above scenario, and is what I have proposed.

 I think this should be a feature request for Calc, personally.

 Paul

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] eWeek.com top stories for today - LO 4.3 is top story

2014-08-05 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster


In today's e-newsletter from eWeek.com  The TOP STORIES -- August 05, 
2014 [listed 5 stories] has a LibreOffice 4.3 story as the top one in 
their list.  The newsletter was actually the eWEEK.com Storage Report 
e-newsletter, but still it is nice that their top story was about 
LibreOffice 4.3.




LibreOffice 4.3 Office Suite Enhances User Experience
http://ct.eweek.com/r/?id=h1b1fe35,90a5294,91953d8dni=151671444rni=24058757p1=08052014

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] question

2014-08-05 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster

On 08/05/2014 02:51 AM, Tomáš Matýs wrote:

Hi,
I am just curious when you update your google+ account, because last
massege is there from january. Maybe there is some problem with the
connection.

with the best regards,
 Tomáš Matýs



Who's google+ account?
LibreOffice's or someone else's?


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] question

2014-08-05 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello there,

On 5 août 2014 17:38:29 CEST, Kracked_P_P---webmaster 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 08/05/2014 02:51 AM, Tomáš Matýs wrote:
 Hi,
 I am just curious when you update your google+ account, because last
 massege is there from january. Maybe there is some problem with the
 connection.

 with the best regards,
  Tomáš Matýs


Who's google+ account?
LibreOffice's or someone else's?


Several people including me man the page and most of all, the G+ community. 
What page are you looking at?

Best,

Charles.


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread William W. Austin
On 2014-08-05 06:02:12, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
  As I recall, at the time of the release of OpenOffice2, it had to 
 be
  like Access 
 
 Braindead.
 
  - but of course, as Sun was mainly running the show, that
  meant that it had to be multi-OS, thus Java based
 
 Bullshit. There are plenty of cross-platform RDBMSes that are not
 implemented in this grotesque proprietary abomination that Java is.
 
  and a fairly simple, drop-in piece of code with an appropriate
  licence. One would do well to remember that at the time, the
 internal
  Sun Base development team only comprised about 3 members of staff
  working full-time on the project, thus resources were painfully
  limited.
 
 Just yet another argument in favor of just providing a driver for a
 client-server RDBMS.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Wolfgang
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
 unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/
 Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot 
 be
 deleted
 
 



-- 
william w. austin aire...@att.net
life is just another phase i'm going through. this time, anyway ...


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Schema in Calc

2014-08-05 Thread dave boland


On Tue, Aug 5, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Paul wrote:
 On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:45:20 +0200
 Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Le 31/07/2014 00:08, Paul a écrit :
   Just out of interest, why would a db driver come into play? This is
   a spreadsheet we're talking about.
   
   The mention of db schema was merely to ask why Calc doesn't have
   something like it.
   
  
  How else would one obtain the schema in the first place ? 
 
 I believe one of us is misunderstanding things. My understanding is
 that the OP didn't actually want a database schema, he just wanted
 something similar for normal spreadsheets.

Actually, the OP (me) started with Calc database because changes are
easy.  Changes are still under way (field names, new fields, etc.), so
I'm using Base to access Calc, which gives me queries.

The next step is a real db, but I'm still sorting that out.  I'm not
interested in RAM-resident, embedded for reasons pointed out in this
thread.  As the db requirements become more clear (size, number of
users, structure), I'll decide.  Could it be a future version of Base? 
Possibly, depending on how it progresses over the rest of the year.  I'm
looking for robust, good performance, reliable, and stright forward
setup (not necessarly easy, but not requiring a db phd).

Dave,
-- 
  dave boland
  dbola...@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster
Thank you. Come to think of it, I can switch the touch-pad off. When 
cells were highlighted, I did alternately keep pressing the shift keys,  
That cleared that up. This notepad does have a spill resistant keyboard 
where there is a mylar film under the keys.

On 8/5/2014 1:58 AM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:
I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc does 
weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a calculation 
in a cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will 
disappear and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly 
highlight a cell to check a formula, then when I press a directional 
arrow, my calculation will disappear and a : will reside in that 
cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an arrow key, or the mouse to move 
from one cell to another and wherever I move will highlight as if I 
was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all started in early 
July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs 4). I 
have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3 (which I 
am currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever 
version used.


I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned 
(the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one or 
more simultaneous running programs.


What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is 
improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for 
anyone else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? 
Perhaps you should sack your tech.



My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.


Does my reasoning sound feasible?


Nope.


Any ideas?


If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, it 
is very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on the 
particular application.

o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially 
those for the keyboard).
o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period 
to test.
o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing 
the trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this is 
possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a 
period. Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its 
sensitivity to test.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker

.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster

I played with that also.  Thank you.

On 8/5/2014 1:32 AM, jorge wrote:

Hi:

It would be about the amount memory assigned in Calc (Menu: Tools-
Options - Memory)

Regards,

Jorge Rodríguez

El lun, 04-08-2014 a las 22:25 -0500, Gregory Forster escribió:

Hi,

  I haven't been on this users group for over two years, primarily
because everything worked great, until now.  I have an inconsistent and
not often issue with Calc.  Well, it's more annoying than anything else,
because I can easily correct it, but it shouldn't be.  Calc does weird
things now and then.  I was creating an elaborate spreadsheet file
consisting of 13 worksheets to record my wife's and mine different Roth
and Traditional IRAs vested in Mutual Funds.  Each worksheet shows the
DATE, transaction DESCRIPTION, DEBIT, CREDIT, share PRICE, SHAREs
obtained, share BALANCE, $ AMOUNT (share PRICE * share BALANCE),
percentage of gain or loss both yearly and per investment, all in
separate columns.  Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a cell, and
press the Enter or Down Arrow key.  My calculation will disappear and a
;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to check
a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will
disappear and a : will reside in that cell.  Sometimes, I'll just move
an arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever
I move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key.

  As I said, these issues are very inconsistent.  They may not happen
for days, then after a few days, they may happen several times, then
intermittent, or not at all.  This all started in early July.  I ran
anti-malware scanners, anti-virus scanners, cleaned the registry, and
defragged.  I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs 4). I have
LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3 (which I am
currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever version used.

  I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he
reasoned (the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with
one or more simultaneous running programs.  I have installed some new
software, some with start up files.  Those software programs were not
really all that important, so I deleted them, the registry entries, and
any start up files.  However, the IRA spreadsheet file is all done, and
I don't know if I'll still have those issue until I start another
spreadsheet project.

  This is all done on an HP Probook 440 G1 14 notebook with a Jan
2014 UEFI, an Intel dual core I3 2.4Ghz Haswell, 4GB DDR3L, and Windows
7 64 bit home premium purchased late last March.

  My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?  Does my
reasoning sound feasible? Any ideas?

Greg

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com





---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster
I do use LO on my desktop.  However, I do not use it as extensively.  My 
son also has it on his laptop, but does not use it very extensively.


Greg

On 8/4/2014 11:46 PM, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:

Hi,

Le 05/08/2014 05:25, Gregory Forster a écrit :

Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a cell, and
press the Enter or Down Arrow key.  My calculation will disappear and a
;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to check
a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will
disappear and a : will reside in that cell.  Sometimes, I'll just move
an arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever
I move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key.

As your problems seem to arise while using the keyboard (the mouse
symptom seems related to the shift key being seen as pressed), I'm
wondering if your laptop keyboard has no problem.

Did you test LO and your spreadsheet on some other hardware?




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: the release 4.3 in PPA launchpad

2014-08-05 Thread NoOp
On 08/03/2014 03:27 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
 В письме от 2 августа 2014 09:57:15 пользователь Kracked_P_P---webmaster 
 написал:
 On 08/02/2014 06:25 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
  Hi,
  The setup from PPA is deemed more important in Ubuntu user community 
 than
  setup from *.deb files. A lot of people have already gotten used to setup
  LibreOffice from PPA
  https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa . But release 4.3
  is not available over there up to now. This brings up the question: Will
  new release be uploaded? And, when it can be expected? As far as I know,
  Rico Tzschichholz is moderator of the PPA in launchpad.net. Thank you.
 
 I had the PPA setup, but I removed it.  I prefer to decide which version
 of LO it have installed.  PPAs, like Repositories, seems to make me feel
 that I am not in control of which version I use. I kept getting the
 message that I need to update/upgrade to a different version with the
 PPAs and Repositories seem to, most of the time, remove the version I am
 using and install an earlier one.
 
 Now that I am not upgrading my desktop from Linux Mint 16 to 17, due to
 a dependency issue that causes two printers not to produce the proper
 coloring when printing photos and image, I am not getting an updates
 anymore.  So I do not have that problem.
 
 For now, I would rather install the exact version of LO via the terminal
 than use a PPA.  That is just my opinion.  For many, it is more
 convenient for the PPAs to do the work for them.  So, when I decide to
 go from 4.2.5 to 4.3.x, I will install it myself.  I have not tested
 4.3.0.x on any system.  I prefer to test it out on a system that is not
 my production and default one till the version is tested on a Win7
 and/or Ubuntu-based boot of my laptop.
 
 In my opinion, PPA gives more freedom to install and upgrade, and not only 
 makes installation easier in the system. This can be viewed in the direction 
 apt-get, aptitude and Sinaptic for Deb-based OS. There are excellent articles 
 on their use that enables having the maximum choice in their package system

Congrats to the LibbreOffice Packaging team... however the average
user on this list should *read*  and understand the full contents of the
'PPA description' prior to adding to their sources.list. Examples:

quote
PPA description

LibreOffice test builds and backports
...
Most of the packages in this PPA have only experienced minor testing --
in fact it is the place to enable a wider audience to test packages
before they are published into the distro proper. In general, this PPA
is _not_ for the average user to install without a closer look (if it
would be, its packages would be in the main repositories). OTOH, it is
_way_ _better_ to use packages from this PPA than using the *.deb files
that The Document Foundation provides upstream, which are intentionally
build against a very old baseline for maximum compatibility. So, _if_
you want to be on the bleeding edge, do it here, not with upstream *.debs.
/quote

Also be aware that if you are using Ubuntu 12.04.x (Precise) the PPA
contains a slew of additional packages which may, or may not, affect the
standard released versions of those packages on your existing system.

Sample:

accessodf   0.1-4ubuntu1~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (2014-04-05)
boost1.54   1.54.0-2ubuntu3~precise1Rico Tzschichholz (2014-02-01)
clucene-core2.3.3.4-2~precise1  Rico Tzschichholz (2012-09-01)
dh-exec 0.12~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (2014-02-01)
dh-python   1.20140128-1ubuntu8~ctools1 Scott Moser (3 hours ago)
doxygen 1.8.7-2~precise1Rico Tzschichholz (3 hours ago)
glew1.10.0-3~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (3 hours ago)
graphite2   1.2.4-1ubuntu1~precise1 Rico Tzschichholz (2014-02-01)

Disclaimer: I've nothing against using the PPA - I have not as I install
the .deb packages directly from LO instead.

 management. However, this topic is not for this list, but for a discussion in 
 an user community of particular OS.

You've brought up the question regarding the PPA here instead of asking at:

For questions and bugs with software in this PPA please contact
LibreOffice Packaging.
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice
  https://answers.launchpad.net/~libreoffice
Questions for LibreOffice Packaging
“LibreOffice Packaging” team
Questions

So I think it worthwhile to point out the PPA (Personal Package Archive)
'heads-up' here.


 
 Meanwhile, LO 4.3 realise is in the PPA now 
 https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-4-3 
 
 Thanks!
 



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] [ODF 1.2 compatibility] Re: UK Government adopts Open Document Format

2014-08-05 Thread NoOp
On 08/04/2014 01:21 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
 Following on from previous threads, this is good news for LibreOffice:
 
 Government documents will use what are known as open standards for
 document formats. Word processor files will be saved with “.odt”
 suffixes, rather than “.doc”.
 
 https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2014/07/22/making-things-open-making-things-better/
 
 
 

Wow! Excellent stuff. Now for an LO user specific question...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-for-government/sharing-or-collaborating-with-government-documents
states that ODF 1.2 is prefered and will be used ( also see:
http://standards.data.gov.uk/meeting/technical-standards-panel-meeting-17-march-2014
). So LO 4.1 default is set to ODF 1.2 Extended (recommened), however
there are these ODF 1.2 options to choose from
(Tools|Options|Load/Save|General[Default file format and ODF settings]):

ODF 1.2
ODF 1.2 Extended (compat mode)
ODF 1.2 Extended (recommened)

Does anyone know:
1. What the difference is between 'ODF 1.2 Extended (compat mode)' and
'ODF 1.2 Extended (recommened)'?
2. If using 'ODF 1.2 Extended (recommened)' will cause issues with the
UK Gov 'ODF 1.2'?

Where is Dennis E. Hamilton when you need him? :-)
http://orcmid.com/blog/2010/02/worst-nightmare-opendocument-format.asp


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 05/08/2014 12:02, Wolfgang Keller a écrit :

 
 Bullshit. There are plenty of cross-platform RDBMSes that are not
 implemented in this grotesque proprietary abomination that Java is.
 

My comment, or Sun's decision ?
How many of those cross-platform RDBMs were :

- available in 2004 (when the decision was made to upgrade the OOo1 Base
iteration to something new) ?

- didn't require masses of developer investment time and resources to
integrate into the codebase ?

- ran on OSX, Windows and Linux ?

- weren't Java based ?

- could be made to run in a single file and be portable across various
OSes ?



Personally, I always regretted the demise of the way database
functionality was set up in OOo1.

Alex



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: the release 4.3 in PPA launchpad

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Thats an interesting list of add-ons/Extensions or additional packages.  Is
there any easy clue as to what they do?  I personally suspect they do add
something positive to LibreOffice and might consider adding them to my
upstream install of LO.
Regards from
Tom :)




On 5 August 2014 20:12, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 On 08/03/2014 03:27 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
  В письме от 2 августа 2014 09:57:15 пользователь Kracked_P_P---webmaster
  написал:
  On 08/02/2014 06:25 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
   Hi,
   The setup from PPA is deemed more important in Ubuntu user community
  than
   setup from *.deb files. A lot of people have already gotten used to
 setup
   LibreOffice from PPA
   https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa . But release
 4.3
   is not available over there up to now. This brings up the question:
 Will
   new release be uploaded? And, when it can be expected? As far as I
 know,
   Rico Tzschichholz is moderator of the PPA in launchpad.net. Thank
 you.
 
  I had the PPA setup, but I removed it.  I prefer to decide which version
  of LO it have installed.  PPAs, like Repositories, seems to make me feel
  that I am not in control of which version I use. I kept getting the
  message that I need to update/upgrade to a different version with the
  PPAs and Repositories seem to, most of the time, remove the version I am
  using and install an earlier one.
 
  Now that I am not upgrading my desktop from Linux Mint 16 to 17, due to
  a dependency issue that causes two printers not to produce the proper
  coloring when printing photos and image, I am not getting an updates
  anymore.  So I do not have that problem.
 
  For now, I would rather install the exact version of LO via the terminal
  than use a PPA.  That is just my opinion.  For many, it is more
  convenient for the PPAs to do the work for them.  So, when I decide to
  go from 4.2.5 to 4.3.x, I will install it myself.  I have not tested
  4.3.0.x on any system.  I prefer to test it out on a system that is not
  my production and default one till the version is tested on a Win7
  and/or Ubuntu-based boot of my laptop.
 
  In my opinion, PPA gives more freedom to install and upgrade, and not
 only
  makes installation easier in the system. This can be viewed in the
 direction
  apt-get, aptitude and Sinaptic for Deb-based OS. There are excellent
 articles
  on their use that enables having the maximum choice in their package
 system

 Congrats to the LibbreOffice Packaging team... however the average
 user on this list should *read*  and understand the full contents of the
 'PPA description' prior to adding to their sources.list. Examples:

 quote
 PPA description

 LibreOffice test builds and backports
 ...
 Most of the packages in this PPA have only experienced minor testing --
 in fact it is the place to enable a wider audience to test packages
 before they are published into the distro proper. In general, this PPA
 is _not_ for the average user to install without a closer look (if it
 would be, its packages would be in the main repositories). OTOH, it is
 _way_ _better_ to use packages from this PPA than using the *.deb files
 that The Document Foundation provides upstream, which are intentionally
 build against a very old baseline for maximum compatibility. So, _if_
 you want to be on the bleeding edge, do it here, not with upstream *.debs.
 /quote

 Also be aware that if you are using Ubuntu 12.04.x (Precise) the PPA
 contains a slew of additional packages which may, or may not, affect the
 standard released versions of those packages on your existing system.

 Sample:

 accessodf   0.1-4ubuntu1~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (2014-04-05)
 boost1.54   1.54.0-2ubuntu3~precise1Rico Tzschichholz
 (2014-02-01)
 clucene-core2.3.3.4-2~precise1  Rico Tzschichholz (2012-09-01)
 dh-exec 0.12~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (2014-02-01)
 dh-python   1.20140128-1ubuntu8~ctools1 Scott Moser (3 hours ago)
 doxygen 1.8.7-2~precise1Rico Tzschichholz (3 hours ago)
 glew1.10.0-3~precise1   Rico Tzschichholz (3 hours ago)
 graphite2   1.2.4-1ubuntu1~precise1 Rico Tzschichholz
 (2014-02-01)

 Disclaimer: I've nothing against using the PPA - I have not as I install
 the .deb packages directly from LO instead.

  management. However, this topic is not for this list, but for a
 discussion in
  an user community of particular OS.

 You've brought up the question regarding the PPA here instead of asking at:

 For questions and bugs with software in this PPA please contact
 LibreOffice Packaging.
 https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice
   https://answers.launchpad.net/~libreoffice
 Questions for LibreOffice Packaging
 “LibreOffice Packaging” team
 Questions

 So I think it worthwhile to point out the PPA (Personal Package Archive)
 'heads-up' here.


 
  Meanwhile, LO 4.3 realise is in the PPA now
  

Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
A Reply to all goes to the whole mailing list and can cover multiple
issues.

I'm glad to hear that playing with the keys did the trick!  Fantastic
answer!

I'm not on the GnuCash mailing list.  Well, i might have posted once or
twice several years ago but i doubt that is remembered!  Still it's good to
be reminded that there LibreOffice fits neatly into a wider eco-system of
office apps.

Renaming the User Profile is marginally better than deleting it.  It means
you can easily return things to the way they were.  It's a good plan to
create a copy of a User Profile that does work so that if trouble strikes
then you have a back-up that you can return to!  (i rarely remember until
after it's too late)

Anyway congrats on success with the ingenious answer!
Regards from
Tom :)






On 5 August 2014 18:02, Gregory Forster fgre...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thank you. Come to think of it, I can switch the touch-pad off. When cells
 were highlighted, I did alternately keep pressing the shift keys,  That
 cleared that up. This notepad does have a spill resistant keyboard where
 there is a mylar film under the keys.
 On 8/5/2014 1:58 AM, Brian Barker wrote:

 At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:

 I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc does
 weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a
 cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will disappear
 and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to
 check a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will
 disappear and a : will reside in that cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an
 arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever I
 move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all
 started in early July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice
 (vs 4). I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3
 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever
 version used.

 I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned
 (the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one or more
 simultaneous running programs.


 What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is
 improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for anyone
 else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? Perhaps you should
 sack your tech.

  My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


 I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.

  Does my reasoning sound feasible?


 Nope.

  Any ideas?


 If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, it is
 very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on the
 particular application.
 o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
 o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
 o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
 o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially those
 for the keyboard).
 o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period to
 test.
 o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing the
 trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this is
 possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a period.
 Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its sensitivity to test.

 I trust this helps.

 Brian Barker

 .



 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
 unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster

Thanks Tom,

Actually, I deleted the user profile a few times and started over 
from scratch.  BTW, are you the same that's on the Gnucash usergroup 
emails now and then?


Greg

On 8/5/2014 3:35 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Perhaps try renaming your User Profile?  Sudden change in behavior or 
weird wonkiness might be down to something going wonky in the User 
Profile;

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile

Renaming the profile means you can still get back to it if it doesn't 
fix things so it's a good way to get back to factory defaults.

Good luck and regards from
Tom :)



On 5 August 2014 07:58, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com 
mailto:b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:


At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:

I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...]
Calc does weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I
complete a calculation in a cell, and press the Enter or Down
Arrow key. My calculation will disappear and a ;6 will appear
in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to check a
formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation
will disappear and a : will reside in that cell. Sometimes,
I'll just move an arrow key, or the mouse to move from one
cell to another and wherever I move will highlight as if I was
holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all started in early
July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs
4). I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and
4.0.3 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same
issues with whichever version used.


I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he
reasoned (the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict
issues with one or more simultaneous running programs.


What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is
improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for
anyone else? And why would that behaviour change in early July?
Perhaps you should sack your tech.


My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.


Does my reasoning sound feasible?


Nope.

Any ideas?


If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one
application, it is very easy to blame a more general problem with
your computer on the particular application.
o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially
those for the keyboard).
o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient
period to test.
o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm
grazing the trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't
believe this is possible, so get someone else to watch as you use
the system for a period. Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or
reducing its sensitivity to test.

I trust this helps.

Brian Barker



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org

mailto:users%2bunsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
cannot be deleted






---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster
Woops, I meant to click the spell-check and not the send.  That all 
explains well for the unexplained highlighting, but what about the 
random ;6 (semi-colon and the number six) at times, or the random : 
(colon) at times, replacing cell contents by just pressing a directional 
arrow key.  That,  I can't  figure out.  No, I won't sack my tech (he's 
my son - we work together). It ONLY happens with LO Calc, not Impress, 
or Writer, or Base, or any other program.  In fact, I extensively use 
Gnucash.  I am the Treasurer, Financial Accountant and do the payroll 
for church and also use Gnucash for personal finance records - No problems.


However, you did give me ideas and reminders.   I've always been very 
passionate about backups and keeping your hard drive clean from malware, 
viruses, rootkits, etc. of which we also nag our clients about..  I 
forgot about keeping the keyboard clean.  Thank you.


Greg

On 8/5/2014 1:58 AM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:
I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc does 
weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a calculation 
in a cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will 
disappear and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly 
highlight a cell to check a formula, then when I press a directional 
arrow, my calculation will disappear and a : will reside in that 
cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an arrow key, or the mouse to move 
from one cell to another and wherever I move will highlight as if I 
was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all started in early 
July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs 4). I 
have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3 (which I 
am currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever 
version used.


I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned 
(the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one or 
more simultaneous running programs.


What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is 
improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for 
anyone else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? 
Perhaps you should sack your tech.



My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.


Does my reasoning sound feasible?


Nope.


Any ideas?


If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, it 
is very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on the 
particular application.

o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially 
those for the keyboard).
o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period 
to test.
o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing 
the trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this is 
possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a 
period. Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its 
sensitivity to test.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker

.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

2014-08-05 Thread arakish
It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.

What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version Release
Candidate, the proven stable version Stable, the unstable beta-tester
version Beta?

It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of
being different.  Is not Libre Office already different?  Yes, it is a fork
from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.

Stick with the standards.  This fresh and still horse hoowhee is just
that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.

As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download
page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse
hoowhee.

Just stick with what almost everyone already knows.  Quit trying to be new
and gritty.  It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence.

rmfr



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base questions

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I was kinda agreeing with you, hence the +1.  I think people kinda
understood what you meant and i suspect other people agree with you too.
The devs sometimes have great plans and good ideas and then users do some
crazy things.  It's difficult to anticipate what users will find difficult
and what is going to be easier for them to understand.

I've really enjoyed this thread.  Some amusing and enlightening posts.
Thanks and regards from


On 5 August 2014 14:56, Jon Harringdon jonathan.harring...@virgin.net
wrote:

 Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:

  I think Base nearly does do the best way around.  The only problem is
 that
  the easiest thing, the embedded database, is currently dangerously
 broken.
   The devs appear to be addressing that although, obviously, they can't
 fix
  the whole thing all at one go.  The first step seems reasonably well
 chosen
  to get the main bulk away from java.
 
  I'm sure Java didn't used to be so awful.  It seems to have nose-dived
  since Oracle took over but maybe that is preparation for monetising it
 and
  that is a reasonable thing for a profit-making company to want to do.

 My criticism was not at all directed specifically against Base as I
 don't know the first thing about it. It was rather directed against the
 idea that developers know better than users. They rarely, if ever, do,
 IMHO.

 Users have a zillion creative ways of (mis-)using a product, many of
 them undreamt-of by its developers. So the more user choice and less
 developer diktat a product exhibits, the better it is, in general.

 I avoid Java as much as I possibly can (read: always) but my argument
 has nothing whatsoever to do with Java.

 Jon

 
  On 5 August 2014 13:33, Jon Harringdon jonathan.harring...@virgin.net
  wrote:
 
   Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
  
 So I come back to my suggestion earlier today - LO Base needs to
 give
 the user the opportunity to specify what they want - RAM or file
 based, single file or multiple files.
   
That would only confuse most end users.
  
   Hear, hear.
  
The point is that the developers should make the most reasonable
choice
  
   This mindset will not help LO broaden its user base. Users (even if
 most
   are apparently deemed stupid by some) should be in the driving seat and
   not some anonymous developers.
  
   Pip Coburn writes this about the tech industry: I believe that users
   are always in charge and that supply is a necessary but not sufficient
   condition for commercial success. Companies and products geared toward
   this holistic user orientation will succeed at far greater rates than
   those stuck in a supplier-oriented mind-set. As far as I'm concerned
   that hits the nail squarely on the head.
  
   And as to confusing users with complex choices... a well-designed
 system
   can be simple for simple needs and complex for complex needs.
  
   One-size-fits-all rarely fits anyone.
  
   IMHO etc.
  
   Jon
  
   --
   To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
   Problems?
   http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
   Posting guidelines + more:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
   List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
   All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
   deleted
  
  


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Gregory Forster

Hi Tom:)

I was so  sure you were on the Gnucash site, oh well.  I don't know 
anymore weird things are still going on.  My elaborate spreadsheet is 
complete.   I'll just have to wait to do another fancy spreadsheet.  
However, I DID vacuum, with brush, my keyboard.


Greg

On 8/5/2014 5:14 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I think the comment about sacking your tech support was meant as a 
joke.  I think we kinda assume people who reach this mailing-list 
probably ARE the tech support.  I'm sure everyone makes amusing 
blunders at times.  Easier to laugh about it after recovery!


Wrt keyboards i can never figure out why so many paper-clips still 
getting trapped in there when i haven't even used any in about 10 
years.  Maybe my coat-hangers regress into paper-clips as i never have 
enough of them.


Is there still a problem with some weird things still going on?  It 
sounded like you had solved the issues ..

Regards from
Tom :)






On 5 August 2014 18:22, Gregory Forster fgre...@gmail.com 
mailto:fgre...@gmail.com wrote:


Woops, I meant to click the spell-check and not the send.  That
all explains well for the unexplained highlighting, but what about
the random ;6 (semi-colon and the number six) at times, or the
random : (colon) at times, replacing cell contents by just
pressing a directional arrow key.  That,  I can't  figure out.
 No, I won't sack my tech (he's my son - we work together). It
ONLY happens with LO Calc, not Impress, or Writer, or Base, or any
other program.  In fact, I extensively use Gnucash.  I am the
Treasurer, Financial Accountant and do the payroll for church and
also use Gnucash for personal finance records - No problems.

However, you did give me ideas and reminders.   I've always been
very passionate about backups and keeping your hard drive clean
from malware, viruses, rootkits, etc. of which we also nag our
clients about..  I forgot about keeping the keyboard clean.  Thank
you.

Greg


On 8/5/2014 1:58 AM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:

I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc.
[...] Calc does weird things now and then. [...]
Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a cell, and press
the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will disappear
and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly
highlight a cell to check a formula, then when I press a
directional arrow, my calculation will disappear and a :
will reside in that cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an
arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another
and wherever I move will highlight as if I was holding
down the Shift key. [...]  This all started in early July.
[...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice (vs 4).
I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and
4.0.3 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same
issues with whichever version used.

I discussed the issues and history with another tech and
he reasoned (the same as I) that LO was having memory
conflict issues with one or more simultaneous running
programs.


What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions -
is improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but
not for anyone else? And why would that behaviour change in
early July? Perhaps you should sack your tech.

My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.

Does my reasoning sound feasible?


Nope.

Any ideas?


If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one
application, it is very easy to blame a more general problem
with your computer on the particular application.
o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics
(especially those for the keyboard).
o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a
sufficient period to test.
o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm
grazing the trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't
believe this is possible, so get someone else to watch as you
use the system for a period. Try temporarily disabling the
trackpad or reducing its sensitivity to test.

I trust this helps.

Brian Barker

.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!
Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues

2014-08-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think the comment about sacking your tech support was meant as a joke.  I
think we kinda assume people who reach this mailing-list probably ARE the
tech support.  I'm sure everyone makes amusing blunders at times.  Easier
to laugh about it after recovery!

Wrt keyboards i can never figure out why so many paper-clips still getting
trapped in there when i haven't even used any in about 10 years.  Maybe my
coat-hangers regress into paper-clips as i never have enough of them.

Is there still a problem with some weird things still going on?  It sounded
like you had solved the issues ..
Regards from
Tom :)






On 5 August 2014 18:22, Gregory Forster fgre...@gmail.com wrote:

 Woops, I meant to click the spell-check and not the send.  That all
 explains well for the unexplained highlighting, but what about the random
 ;6 (semi-colon and the number six) at times, or the random : (colon) at
 times, replacing cell contents by just pressing a directional arrow key.
  That,  I can't  figure out.  No, I won't sack my tech (he's my son - we
 work together). It ONLY happens with LO Calc, not Impress, or Writer, or
 Base, or any other program.  In fact, I extensively use Gnucash.  I am the
 Treasurer, Financial Accountant and do the payroll for church and also use
 Gnucash for personal finance records - No problems.

 However, you did give me ideas and reminders.   I've always been very
 passionate about backups and keeping your hard drive clean from malware,
 viruses, rootkits, etc. of which we also nag our clients about..  I forgot
 about keeping the keyboard clean.  Thank you.

 Greg


 On 8/5/2014 1:58 AM, Brian Barker wrote:

 At 22:25 04/08/2014 -0500, Gregory Forster wrote:

 I have an inconsistent and not often issue with Calc. [...] Calc does
 weird things now and then. [...] Sometimes, I complete a calculation in a
 cell, and press the Enter or Down Arrow key. My calculation will disappear
 and a ;6 will appear in the cell. Or I may randomly highlight a cell to
 check a formula, then when I press a directional arrow, my calculation will
 disappear and a : will reside in that cell. Sometimes, I'll just move an
 arrow key, or the mouse to move from one cell to another and wherever I
 move will highlight as if I was holding down the Shift key. [...]  This all
 started in early July. [...] I changed different versions of LibreOffice
 (vs 4). I have LO 4.3.0, 4.2.5, 4.2.2, 4.1.4, 4.1.3, 4.1.2, and 4.0.3
 (which I am currently using).  I still had the same issues with whichever
 version used.

 I discussed the issues and history with another tech and he reasoned
 (the same as I) that LO was having memory conflict issues with one or more
 simultaneous running programs.


 What, you mean that LibreOffice - in many different versions - is
 improperly sharing memory with other programs for you but not for anyone
 else? And why would that behaviour change in early July? Perhaps you should
 sack your tech.

  My questions are: Has anyone else experienced the same?


 I doubt it - at least, not as a problem with the software.

  Does my reasoning sound feasible?


 Nope.

  Any ideas?


 If you spend a lot of time on one project or using one application, it is
 very easy to blame a more general problem with your computer on the
 particular application.
 o Try draining the spilt coffee from your keyboard.
 o Try shaking the biscuit crumbs from your keyboard.
 o Try poking out the cat hairs from your keyboard.
 o Try running your computer manufacturer's diagnostics (especially those
 for the keyboard).
 o Try attaching an external keyboard and using for a sufficient period to
 test.
 o Does your notebook have a trackpad? Is your thumb or palm grazing the
 trackpad as you move your fingers about? You won't believe this is
 possible, so get someone else to watch as you use the system for a period.
 Try temporarily disabling the trackpad or reducing its sensitivity to test.

 I trust this helps.

 Brian Barker

 .



 ---
 This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
 protection is active.
 http://www.avast.com


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
 unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

2014-08-05 Thread J. Van Brimmer
+1
 On Aug 5, 2014 6:42 PM, arakish rmfrun...@gmail.com wrote:

 It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.

 What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version Release
 Candidate, the proven stable version Stable, the unstable beta-tester
 version Beta?

 It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of
 being different.  Is not Libre Office already different?  Yes, it is a fork
 from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.

 Stick with the standards.  This fresh and still horse hoowhee is just
 that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.

 As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download
 page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse
 hoowhee.

 Just stick with what almost everyone already knows.  Quit trying to be new
 and gritty.  It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence.

 rmfr



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

2014-08-05 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi,
The problem we have: We do not have one release branch as Firefox has, we have 
two... Users should use and find bugs on the Fresh version in order to make 
thee fresh, which will be renamed to stable after 6M.
So how to say you can use the feature packed fresh? It is not an RC it is an 
tested final release
So yes, we have a different model, so we need different names then the standard 
:)

On 06. August 2014 06:47:59 MESZ, J. Van Brimmer jerry...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
 On Aug 5, 2014 6:42 PM, arakish rmfrun...@gmail.com wrote:

 It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.

 What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version
Release
 Candidate, the proven stable version Stable, the unstable
beta-tester
 version Beta?

 It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake
of
 being different.  Is not Libre Office already different?  Yes, it is
a fork
 from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.

 Stick with the standards.  This fresh and still horse hoowhee is
just
 that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.

 As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the
download
 page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the
horse
 hoowhee.

 Just stick with what almost everyone already knows.  Quit trying to
be new
 and gritty.  It just shows me your stupidity instead of your
intelligence.

 rmfr



 --
 View this message in context:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

2014-08-05 Thread john herron


Thoroughly agree!
+1

jdh

On 08/06/2014 06:47 AM, J. Van Brimmer wrote:

+1
  On Aug 5, 2014 6:42 PM, arakish rmfrun...@gmail.com wrote:


It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.

What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version Release
Candidate, the proven stable version Stable, the unstable beta-tester
version Beta?

It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of
being different.  Is not Libre Office already different?  Yes, it is a fork
from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.

Stick with the standards.  This fresh and still horse hoowhee is just
that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.

As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download
page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse
hoowhee.

Just stick with what almost everyone already knows.  Quit trying to be new
and gritty.  It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence.

rmfr



--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted





--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

2014-08-05 Thread Pikov Andropov
Florian Reisinger wrote on 8/6/2014 1:22 AM:
 Hi,
 The problem we have: We do not have one release branch as Firefox has, we 
 have two... Users should use and find bugs on the Fresh version in order to 
 make thee fresh, which will be renamed to stable after 6M.
 So how to say you can use the feature packed fresh? It is not an RC it is 
 an tested final release
 So yes, we have a different model, so we need different names then the 
 standard :)

What are the differences between the two branches?

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted