Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3/4/13 in writer table
On 03/05/2013 06:32 AM, william drescher wrote: On 3/4/2013 12:01 PM, upscope wrote: On Monday, March 04, 2013 10:09:52 AM bill wrote: I have a writer document with a table. The first col is formatted as date, but when I enter today ( 3/4/13 ) the 3/4 is formatted as a small 3/4th. I checked the col formatting and it really is date (MM/DD/YY) Any thoughts or suggestions ? Is it a col. or a table. it is a column in a table in a writer document. Are you using Table--Number Format --Date to select the format of the date? yes bill If the column is in Calc then you may need to make the 3/4/13 cell into a text or date cell first. Format Cells Numbers Category Text or Format Cells Numbers Category Date Format - the first option depending if you want it to be a date or text cell -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Thesaurus is a dictionary of synonyms or real thesaurus
On 03/04/2013 04:12 AM, András Csányi wrote: Dear All, I would like to ask some help regarding thesaurus in Libreoffice. I'm a librarian an whenever I hear that there is thesaurus in the Libreoffice I cannot decide whether this is a dictionary of the synonyms or a real thesaurus used by librarians. Here you can read about what the thesaurus is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus Thanks in advance, András Here is the definition of thesaurus according to your link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus - A thesaurus is a reference work that lists words grouped together according to similarity of meaning (containing synonyms and sometimes antonyms), in contrast to a dictionary, which contains definitions and pronunciations. The one[s] I have installed, with 4.0.0, shows similar terms. For belly it shows several types of nouns and verb replacements for that word/term. I also know that there are adjectives and adverbs listed for some words. These may be listed by other thesaurus systems as synonym, derivatives, kind of, kinds, and parts. I have even seen the term of domain listed under the term relatives. So, we have the synonyms and other relatives. As for antonyms, well I have not looked at a lot of words in the thesaurus system/file[s] I use, but we are dependent on others to create these for us. Actually, my book thesaurus is a Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus and I do not see antonyms listed for the words I looked at. As far as I know, most of the dictionary and thesaurus options are based on the WordNet and Hunspell format and offerings. We rely on these free offerings, and others, to be able to have language aids included in LibreOffice. SO, please tell us what is used by a librarian/library as a reference thesaurus. I would like to know. What do you mean by real thesaurus used by librarians. Also, I use an offline dictionary[definitions] and thesaurus called Artha that I use on my Ubuntu/Linux and Windows systems. This is free, like LibreOffice. I looked up many words using it, over the past few years, and I do not remember if it showed and antonyms. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] has anyone seen page scaling option in LO printing?
I was wondering. . . Has anyone seen the page scaling option when printing within LO? This is a needed option that is shown within the printing options for non-LO packages. The scaling options are: None, Shrink to Printing Area, and Fit to Printing Area. It is a part of the Page Handling tab when I print the PDF version of the document from the Ubuntu default viewer I need this option to be set to None when I print brochures and other documents that are formatted to the page with folded panels. So has anyone seen this option printing within LO for your printing? I normally set it to shrink to printing area to deal with the header/footer lines when printing a web page to a PDF file using CUPS-PDF printing optionwith Firefox. So it is a pain to set it to none for a brochure testprint via the System/Administration/Printing option/menu, and then set it back again for my normal printing. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Thesaurus is a dictionary of synonyms or real thesaurus
On 03/04/2013 11:23 AM, doug wrote: On 03/04/2013 04:12 AM, András Csányi wrote: Dear All, I would like to ask some help regarding thesaurus in Libreoffice. I'm a librarian an whenever I hear that there is thesaurus in the Libreoffice I cannot decide whether this is a dictionary of the synonyms or a real thesaurus used by librarians. Here you can read about what the thesaurus is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus Thanks in advance, András If you want a real thesaurus, install Artha. It's a very good dictionary (for meanings, not pronunciation) and a real thesaurus. Its only fault, as I see it, is that it considers all words very rare--and it's rarely right on that score! --doug I do not see many antonyms listed. I just wonder what is meant by a real thesaurus used by librarians. To be honest, my printed book thesaurus does not show much more than LO's thesaurus or Athra's thesaurus information . -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Impress remote under windows
Sometimes it is needed to know if things are needing the experimental features option checked to get it to work. I was told to do that to get the solution to an issue, once, but the solution was not part of those features. So, it is nice you found the issue, but it would be nice to know what is needing that option to work. On 03/03/2013 07:12 PM, Boyi Chen wrote: Solved. Just enable experimental feature in Options. Sorry about my carelessness. On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Boyi Chen fts...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using LibreOffice RC 4.0.1.2 for windows and Impress Remote 1.0.4, but when I tried using impress remote on Android, it can't connect to my laptop. The problem is impress not listen on TCP 1599, but still listen on UDP 1598. Anyone has a suggestion to resolve it? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinctsetoffonts?
That is why I have Web Of Trust install on all of my browsers. It is free and works very well. It will rate the sites, when googling, to help you keep out of the nasty sights. I only go to sites listed as green. http://www.fontspace.com/ http://www.dafont.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/ These are the first three green ones I have gone to in the past. Of course, it is always nice to scan any file you download, just to be on the safe side. On 02/26/2013 10:14 PM, anne-ology wrote: Thanks. In order to avoid these nasty viruses, I tend to avoid many of these 'finds' through the search engines ;-) On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.comwrote: One of my favorite free fonts is OFL Sorts Mill Goudy from http://www.** theleagueofmoveabletype.com/ http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/. It comes in both TrueType and OpenType formats. I've found I prefer the TrueType as it displays better on my screen. Both print very nicely. There are other free fonts at the website that you might enjoy. One thing I learned the hard way is that free font files sometimes come complete with viruses, so I would be fairly careful about obtaining free fonts online. Virgil From: anne-ology Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:16 PM To: Webmaster Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinctsetoffonts? I guess it'd be asking too much for you to share your script-fonts with me ;-) I've been missing them so ... ... ... you could DropBox them - http://db.tt/QBTMH08Z On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them] Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files. Every so often I do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e. handwriting, holiday, etc.]. The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are sorted by name. There are many, many, free font sites out there. Some better than others. Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like letters made out of bones, or rope, or look like wood. That sort of thing, when I need something I do not have. I have a large collection of handwriting ones. Alway want to find better ones for different types of documents. I currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, calligraphy, and brush type. On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote: and how does one acquire these nice fonts? I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be replaced by these odd-character ones, which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language ;-) On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not. I have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010. The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to the /fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any choice. One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to say I do not want them. Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, but it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550 fonts to my Windows font folder. That was a vector graphic package back in the Win XP days. What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the packages can access them. I did that with the LO fonts including the DejaVu ones. On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous. When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying something along the lines of Installing font or words to that effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows is notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task. My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem regardless of my method of installation. However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a couple of really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder of the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not other programs. Virgil
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?
I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them] Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files. Every so often I do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e. handwriting, holiday, etc.]. The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are sorted by name. There are many, many, free font sites out there. Some better than others. Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like letters made out of bones, or rope, or look like wood. That sort of thing, when I need something I do not have. I have a large collection of handwriting ones. Alway want to find better ones for different types of documents. I currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, calligraphy, and brush type. On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote: and how does one acquire these nice fonts? I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be replaced by these odd-character ones, which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language ;-) On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not. I have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010. The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to the /fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any choice. One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to say I do not want them. Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, but it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550 fonts to my Windows font folder. That was a vector graphic package back in the Win XP days. What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the packages can access them. I did that with the LO fonts including the DejaVu ones. On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous. When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying something along the lines of Installing font or words to that effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows is notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task. My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem regardless of my method of installation. However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a couple of really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder of the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not other programs. Virgil snip -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?
Well . . . . I have over 1.5 GB of those fonts in the handwriting, script, and brush folder. If you really want to look for specific fonts, you might want to try the free font sites. Many of those have a large number of these types of fonts. All you have to do it look and choose. Uploading takes hours and hours. One DVD in size takes about 10 hours to upload. So, look at those free fonts sites first. Then if you really want to get MY Collection, we can talk. On 02/26/2013 03:16 PM, anne-ology wrote: I guess it'd be asking too much for you to share your script-fonts with me ;-) I've been missing them so ... ... ... you could DropBox them - http://db.tt/QBTMH08Z On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them] Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files. Every so often I do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e. handwriting, holiday, etc.]. The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are sorted by name. There are many, many, free font sites out there. Some better than others. Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like letters made out of bones, or rope, or look like wood. That sort of thing, when I need something I do not have. I have a large collection of handwriting ones. Alway want to find better ones for different types of documents. I currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, calligraphy, and brush type. On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote: and how does one acquire these nice fonts? I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be replaced by these odd-character ones, which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language ;-) On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not. I have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010. The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to the /fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any choice. One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to say I do not want them. Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, but it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550 fonts to my Windows font folder. That was a vector graphic package back in the Win XP days. What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the packages can access them. I did that with the LO fonts including the DejaVu ones. On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous. When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying something along the lines of Installing font or words to that effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows is notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task. My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem regardless of my method of installation. However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a couple of really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder of the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not other programs. Virgil snip -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: setting paper size
I just tried my Canon MG6220 with User 5.5 by 8.5 and it worked fine on LO 4.0.0.3. I used Portrait as well. I tried it with a Ubuntu 64-bit system. I cold fire up my Win7 laptop and try it, but it worked on this Linux system. On 02/26/2013 04:00 PM, edo1 wrote: Nah, I rather think after seeing your results that it's just that my ip2600 is too old a printer to be able to talk to LO. As I can work around that, I'm happy - edo1 steveedmonds wrote On 2013-02-27 09:24, edo1 wrote: I figured out my problem with page sizes after we discussed the problem here, so I thought I report what I've found. LO and my Canon IP 2600 printer talk to each other fine in Vista x 64 as long as I choose a paper size that's registered in LO; LO won't recognize a custom-size page that I create. For example, LO doesn't recognize my custom half sheet of 5.5 x 8.5. The closest I can come is to select the registered A5 sheet (5.83 x 8.27). I have to do this in both LO versions 3 and 4. While my old sun/oracle OpenOffice was able to recognize custom sizes and it's a bother not to have that convenience in LO, I guess this doesn't rise to the level of a bug. - edo1 Hi. I just tried from LO 3.6.3 using page size USER and setting my page size and it prints ok on a half sheet. My printer is a Ricoh postscript printer. So may be it is a bug you have. Steve -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@.libreoffice Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/setting-paper-size-tp4033383p4040333.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setof fonts?
I was always taught to use the install procedure. It use to be that you can have fonts in that folder, but not being used by you system. I am glad that that as been removed. It is alway good to looks at the fonts with a font viewer just before you install them, so you make sure they are the ones you want. I have accidentally installed a bunch of fonts that were not useful to me, when I was dealing with XP and Vista systems on a regular basis. Now I use Ubuntu on my desktop first and Win XP and Win7 on laptops, as needed. On 02/25/2013 01:21 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: When I install fonts to my Win7 computer, I just copy the font files to the C:\windows\fonts folder using Windows Explorer. I've never had a problem doing it this way. Virgil -Original Message- From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:48 PM To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setof fonts? For Win7 systems - you can see them through Control Panel All Control Panel Items Fonts which was on the left hand side of the window. Now you can delete the fonts by right clicking on it and using the delete option[s]. To install fonts, you must have the font setting to NOT make a link to the font. That is always trouble. So from there, you just have a list of fonts in a working folder and right click on the font[s] you want to install and use the install option. That is how I do this. The only issue is you will need to know what fonts all of you packages use so you do not delete any needed ones. For myself, I have over 200 items listed on my Win7 laptop and over 500 font files in my .fonts folder on my Ubuntu desktop. On 02/25/2013 12:29 PM, anne-ology wrote: yikes ;-( and the proper way for WIN7 would be ??? ;-) I was just about to check into finding more then plopping them in; now I'll wait for further instructions. yep ... I think this 'glorified typewriter' is making me 'feel stupider stupider' ... On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:25 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: For the Windows users, and the Linux users, you really should use the font install procedures. For Windows, there should be a font listing in its Control Panel and a way to install fonts there. For Ubuntu users, all you have to do in click on the font and it should open the font installation window with the install button. That way you can see the font before you install it. I like that better than dumping the font into the hidden .fonts folder. This is mostly the fonts you install after the fact and not ones installed by the OS. If you are never going to use any non-English language, then do this. . . Open LibreOffice and scroll down the list of fonts in the font drop-box in the formatting toolbar. Look at the fonts that have a name on the left and glyphs on the right. This will show for dinbats and icon based fonts. ALSO it will show you glyphs for the non-English/non-Latin style of fonts. Think Arabic or an Asian language. At that point, write down all of the font names that have these fonts you do not want. Then go to a package that has a font viewer and search for the fonts, if the is no file name that matches. I have a bunch of fonts like that. To be honest, there are other places that hold the fonts for Ubuntu, so you will have to search for then. BE CAREFUL not to remove any folders or delete them permanently since you might have removed a needed for for one of your packages. My install of Ubuntu has many Middle Eastern and Asian fonts installed by default, even though I use English for my language. I may remove most of them someday, but it will be a slow process so I do not make any mistakes. If you use Ubuntu, use the Software Center and look at the font packages installed. Then remove those that are not part of your language, like India or Arabic for English. On 02/23/2013 08:23 PM, anne-ology wrote: Thanks!!! On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 02/23/2013 07:40 PM, anne-ology wrote: Thank you for responding; but I haven't the foggiest idea what you've said. the font directory of the distro ??? ... AAMOF ??? I would really enjoy getting rid of all those 'junk' fonts ... and finding then dropping in the good ones; but I haven't a clue as to how to so do. ok, it's probably some simple step to locate these then drop them into whatever folder ... but 'the more I learn of these glorified typewriters, the stupider I feel' ;-) ;-) ;-) AAMOF=as a matter of fact You will find a bunch of directories labelled fonts. You want one that has a list of fonts showing as subdirectories. In my distro (pclos) they're in /usr/share: [doug@linux1 fonts]$ ls -la total 184 drwxr-xr-x 17 root
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?
I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not. I have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010. The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to the /fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any choice. One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to say I do not want them. Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, but it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550 fonts to my Windows font folder. That was a vector graphic package back in the Win XP days. What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the packages can access them. I did that with the LO fonts including the DejaVu ones. On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous. When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying something along the lines of Installing font or words to that effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows is notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task. My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem regardless of my method of installation. However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a couple of really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder of the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not other programs. Virgil snip -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?
I think part of the problem is that LO does place fonts in a folder that is not the system's font folder. So if the user has some DejaVu fonts already installed, LO may use its version of fonts over the ones the user installed. Also there would be some fonts in the LO list that are not in the font list for any other package. One problem may be that LO cannot install the fonts in the different distro's font folders. Windows-based, DEB-based, RPM-based, Mac-based, systems all have different ways of installing fonts. So it may be hard to get the font installation for each OS or distro of Linux to work properly. Still, there are issues with package loading up a Windows systems with all the different fonts that they want and not the user choice of fonts. Some packages require a specific font for their operation, and do not use the default system fonts. That can be a problem for users to reduce the number of fonts in their font folder[s]. Ubuntu hides many fonts in their /usr/share/fonts/ folder system. I see Type 1 fonts listed and I do not know why Ubuntu would need Type 1 fonts now that TTF and OTF fonts are the standard font format. But, I will not remove them since they were installed for a reason. The only installed fonts the system installed are the ones that were designed for Asian, India, and Arabic type of language fonts. As for the closeness between versions of Windows, or Linux, it all depends on the desktop environment and where/how they store the system values. Windows tends to change the placement of program and user data with every new version. The only thing that seems to change between a Ubuntu or Debian based distro is the desktop environment. For our windows users, that is the way the display show all of the needed items to do the work. Think the visual differences between XP, Vista, Win7, and the pain of Win8. Think of how you use the Start Button or task bar items. Linux has many different display types. Ubuntu can have its display look many different ways. My Ubuntu 12.04 can use the tile based Unity, or other desktop environments like KDE, MATE, Cinnamon, or a variety of others to change the look and feel of the desktop, making it look like different OSs, even though it is the same OS but different ways of seeing and using things. I personally have Unity, KDE and MATE installed for my Ubuntu 12.04 system. On 02/24/2013 03:22 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I think Win7 and Xp are so different from each other that each would qualify as a separate distro. They are a bit like 2 distros from different families. It's not even as close as Mint or Ubuntu to Debian. Errr, the answer was Win7 but i think that was given later in this thread. Regards from Tom :) From: Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Sunday, 24 February 2013, 0:45 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts? distro: the operating system on your computer (Windows, Linux, OS X, etc.) AAMOF: as far as my other fonts The latter is a guess but it seems logical. So, if you would tell us one more time, what is your operating system. That will tell us the location of your font folder or folders. --Dan On 02/23/2013 07:40 PM, anne-ology wrote: Thank you for responding; but I haven't the foggiest idea what you've said. the font directory of the distro ??? ... AAMOF ??? I would really enjoy getting rid of all those 'junk' fonts ... and finding then dropping in the good ones; but I haven't a clue as to how to so do. ok, it's probably some simple step to locate these then drop them into whatever folder ... but 'the more I learn of these glorified typewriters, the stupider I feel' ;-) ;-) ;-) On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 02/23/2013 06:22 PM, anne-ology wrote: Then how does one get these new ones into the programs for use? As you quoted me before, you weren't reading what I said: put the ffonts in the font directory of your distro. they should then be available for any program on the machine, including LO. That's just what I did on the Mint installation. AAMOF, I deleted all the crap fonts that were on the machine--Liberation and a whole batch of Asian fonts in languages I couldn't even recognize-- and just dumped in a whole directory of usable fonts--probably True-Type, supplied on another distro that wasn't so damned PC. --doug On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:30 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote: I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the operating system, or at least some of the fonts. I'll explain my problem. If I have a look at Character Map
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?
wrote: On 02/23/2013 06:22 PM, anne-ology wrote: Then how does one get these new ones into the programs for use? As you quoted me before, you weren't reading what I said: put the ffonts in the font directory of your distro. they should then be available for any program on the machine, including LO. That's just what I did on the Mint installation. AAMOF, I deleted all the crap fonts that were on the machine--Liberation and a whole batch of Asian fonts in languages I couldn't even recognize-- and just dumped in a whole directory of usable fonts--probably True-Type, supplied on another distro that wasn't so damned PC. --doug On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:30 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote: I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the operating system, or at least some of the fonts. I'll explain my problem. If I have a look at Character Map to find a character that I want (let's say it is an aeroplane), I can find it in the Webdings font (Unicode 00d2, or Ò). See screenshot 1: http://nabble.**documentfoundation.org/file/** n4039236/Character_Map.png http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Character_Map.png But when I use that character in Libre Office and set the font to Webdings, it shows a different character, specifically an in-box. See screenshot 2: http://nabble.** documentfoundation.org/file/**n4039236/Libre_Office_** characters.png http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Libre_Office_characters.png Note that not all characters do this. For example, the first 52 characters (A-Z and a-z) are correct. I would like to know how to solve this discrepancy, so that I can search for characters in Character Map (or an equivalent program) and then use them in Libre Office. (I have tried an alternative program, Specimen Font Viewer, and it shows the same thing as Character Map.) I am using Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit, fully updated) with Libre Office 4.0.0.3 (installed directly from the Libre Office website). Thank you. My 12.04 shows a list of fonts at /opt/libreoffice4.0/share/**fonts/truetype/ They are mostly DejaVu and Liberation fonts but there are others listed as well. I made sure the fonts listed there were also listed in the /.fonts/ hidden folder. that way I had the same fonts for all my packages. I was recently looking at Mint, a derivative of Ubuntu, and I was appalled at the paucity of fonts. Liberation is ugly! You need to find a good set of True-Type fonts and install them. Then you can have, for example, Times-Roman. And most of the odd-ball ones that you might use once in your life-time. I copied the entire fonts directory from PCLOS and replaced the one in Mint. But I think you can get True-Type from Microsoft, free. Not sure how you do that--Google's your friend. --doug -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes
On 02/21/2013 04:01 AM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2013-02-20 21:33, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : On 02/20/2013 05:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote: At 14:36 20/02/2013 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote: Europe A4 size Perhaps that should be everywhere-in-the-world-except-the-United-States-and-Canada A4 size. Brian Barker I do not know about the rest of the world. I knew that Europe tend to use A4. Why USA and Canada uses letter size when the rest use A4, who knows. Here is a short history on it: http://www.serif.com/blog/a-quick-history-on-a4-and-letter-paper-sizes/ Canada follows the US for obvious reasons. IMO, I would rather follow with the A4 and metric sizes, we should all be following the metric sizing. Cheers, Marc The USA had a movement towards Metric, but it failed big-time. We are using more metric in manufacturing, but for use in the home or business, people grew up learning the English system of feet/inches, pounds/ounces, cup/gallon, instead of all of the base-ten metric measurements. Yes, if we taught our kids from the early ages to use metric along with what we use now, maybe we can get them to be more use to the metric system so we can move to it someday as an equal to our current system. Of course, business use letter size paper, letter size storage, letter size presentation devices to hold their letter size paper, and the list goes on and on. All those things that are based on the letter size paper and cannot fit the A4 size paper will have to be replaced so they can fit both sizes - as a standard size - before business will be thinking about using A4 regularly. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?
On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote: I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the operating system, or at least some of the fonts. I'll explain my problem. If I have a look at Character Map to find a character that I want (let's say it is an aeroplane), I can find it in the Webdings font (Unicode 00d2, or Ò). See screenshot 1: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Character_Map.png But when I use that character in Libre Office and set the font to Webdings, it shows a different character, specifically an in-box. See screenshot 2: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Libre_Office_characters.png Note that not all characters do this. For example, the first 52 characters (A-Z and a-z) are correct. I would like to know how to solve this discrepancy, so that I can search for characters in Character Map (or an equivalent program) and then use them in Libre Office. (I have tried an alternative program, Specimen Font Viewer, and it shows the same thing as Character Map.) I am using Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit, fully updated) with Libre Office 4.0.0.3 (installed directly from the Libre Office website). Thank you. My 12.04 shows a list of fonts at /opt/libreoffice4.0/share/fonts/truetype/ They are mostly DejaVu and Liberation fonts but there are others listed as well. I made sure the fonts listed there were also listed in the /.fonts/ hidden folder. that way I had the same fonts for all my packages. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes
On 02/21/2013 12:11 PM, James Knott wrote: webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: The USA had a movement towards Metric, but it failed big-time. It failed because Ronald Regan canceled Jimmy Carter's plans to move to it. Economicsis the key. We do have most things in the grocery store listing both English and Metric measurements. That is for economics as well, since these items would not need different package designs for the regions of the world that speak English and use metric. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes
On 02/21/2013 12:32 PM, steveedmonds wrote: They use a page margin of 0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around them. This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option active that shrinks to fit page, or similar. The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3 column/panel brochure/flier. I have made many brochures over the past year with LO using this margin setup. It might work for you. krackedpress wrote Here are two brochure templates. Since Tom had some questions about margins and such for hand folded brochures, here are the templates I use, or at least the letter size one. They use a page margin of 0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around them. This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option active that shrinks to fit page, or similar. The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3 column/panel brochure/flier. I have made many brochures over the past year with LO using this margin setup. It might work for you. Hi. I also add a fine tick line a couple of mm (1/8) long right at the edge of the paper in the centre of each column break, top and bottom, as folding guides. Really fine and if necessary gray so they can just be seen. Steve I have made some folding guides before. Use some dotted line that is really light gray and not long. I made sure there was one on top and on the bottom of the page so the folder could use them to line up the edge. For LO, I would use Separator line the dotted line 0.25pt width 35% Centered Gray 10% or something similar if I was printing in bw or a color that matches the color of the paper. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?
On 02/21/2013 05:58 PM, John Talbut wrote: On 21/02/13 19:07, Paddy Landau wrote: jowyta wrote Webdings is a M$ font, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webdings and is not Unicode. Yes, the font is not Unicode; the font is merely the way to display a character. The character is Ò (Unicode D2), but the Webdings font displays it as an aeroplane rather than as a capital O with an accent on top. The Webdings font is installed on my machine. Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question; why is Libre Office using the wrong character for the font? I think it is a question of what you define as wrong. LibreOffice uses Unicode and will correctly display Unicode characters in any font that includes the character. The allocation of character codes to Webdings does not seem to be consistent and I have been unable to find an authoritative list. I have Webdings installed (it comes with ttf-mscorefonts via Debian). In my case the Ò character also displays as an inbox tray character using Webdings, the Webding aeroplane character code does not seem to display anything in other fonts. So I think the answer to this question is that what LibreOffice displays depends on which Webdings font you have installed on your machine. The font is not part of LibreOffice. I think the answer to solving the discrepancy is to stick to Unicode fonts which should be consistent across all systems. I have seen this issue with same font name but different font. I have two fonts that call themselves Garamond but look different side by side. Then there are the fonts that are touted to be the same, with the same file name, but are different depending on where it came from or even the version from the same font designer. That is why I have over 100,000 of them and many with the same name. Now, if you really need a character glyph, that is not a letter, to be the same between systems, make it an image and use that and not a font. 99 times out of 100, the receiver of the document will not have your specialty font installed or even the same version installed, so their document will look different. That is why I never send editable documents to a person that I know might not have the EXACT font[s] that I am using. I do not even use Export to PDF, but CUPS-PDF. I know CUPS-PDF will embed the font but I do not know if Export to PDF will embed the more specialty ones. I just have not compared all my fonts since 3.4 days with a system that does not have my core 400+ font files - most versions/styles of/for font names like DejaVu and other ones that I may use a lot and the others are very specialty ones that are used for decorative needs. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letterand A4 sizes
I use inches, but I have used cm when I needed to create a drawing that used a scale of say 1 cm per foot or some other thing that was large and needed to fit on a letter size paper, like a building 's network layout to scale. Try making a building the size of a football field [American-football or soccer-football] onto one letter size page. But, whenever I work with printed documents and not drawings, I use inches. I am use to doing it. The people I deal with are use to it. If I was going to use picas or any other measurement, they would not understand me. I have had laid printing type before so I use to deal with typesetting, but that was in the 70's and long before a computer was smaller than a refrigerator and not a desktop item. Now with desktop publishing and all that comes with it, typesetting concepts seem to no longer be something businesses are willing to deal with. Even professional printer hardly ever use a printing press that uses hand laid type anymore. It is all computer based and transfered to printing plates via laser and photo methods. SO like most I know, I use whatever is easiest for me to deal with. I know of some people that use metric for most of their work, and they live within a mile or three from me in New York State USA and our inch/foot/yard system. The same goes with software. I have not learned draw, yet, since I use other vector-graphics package for too many years to stop now and relearn another free package to do the same. I use Inkscape for Windows and Linux, and before that I used Corel Draw. So, if you prefer to use picas, points, or some other measurement, then that is what works the best for you and no one can say their's would be the measurement method over yours. There are too many people that believe that, even if they can be proven wrong. But, I also define web page fonts by points instead of any other size measurement in my style sheets [.css]. But that is not what was asked. On 02/21/2013 06:19 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote: Let me shift gears slightly. What measurement unit do y'all use in your Writer rulers and margin/spacing settings. I've set mine to use Picas, which is a traditional unit of measurement for typesetting. It's equal to 1/6 inch and provides for very tight control of a document. Do others use Picas? If not, what are you using? Virgil -Original Message- From: Virgil Arrington Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:46 PM To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letterand A4 sizes Children throughout the world can do it. Even you could! You'll never do it until you determine to do so; the only problem is that you haven't yet tried. You're absolutely right, I haven't tried, because I've had no reason to. My system has worked for me (and my fellow Americans) for my entire 57 years on Earth. Until it stops working, I'm quite happy to keep using it. I guess my point is that having something better isn't necessarily enough motivation to produce change. I fully agree that the metric system is better than the English. But, my English system works. I fully and accurately measure things every day with it, and I effectively communicate those measurements to others. Until it stops working, I have little motivation to change. Virgil -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] no longer can erase the .config/libreoffice files and get them remade
I had some problems with LO4 and I just did the erase/removal of the /libreoffice/ in the .config folder. Well it caused these two errors, even after I reinstalled LO 4. We use to just rename the .libreoffice folder, but not it is in the .config folder. When I renamed the /libreoffice/ folder [which has both /3 and /4 folders] and restarted LO4, I got the following errors. Then I reinstalled LO4 [64-bit DEB] and I still got the errors. Something is not right here. Error loading BASIC of document file:///home/timothy/.config/libreoffice/4/user/basic/Standard/script.xlb/: General Error. General input/output error. Error loading BASIC of document file:///home/timothy/.config/libreoffice/4/user/basic/Standard/dialog.xlb/: General Error. General input/output error. -- By-the-way can I remove the .libreoffice folder since LO now has its stuff in the .config folder system? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes
Here are two brochure templates. Since Tom had some questions about margins and such for hand folded brochures, here are the templates I use, or at least the letter size one. They use a page margin of 0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around them. This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option active that shrinks to fit page, or similar. The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3 column/panel brochure/flier. I have made many brochures over the past year with LO using this margin setup. It might work for you. US Letter size http://libreoffice-na.us/brochure-template-1.ott Europe A4 size http://libreoffice-na.us/brochure-template-1--a4.ott If someone want me to, I can make them a bit better and with instructions on how to use them for the different folding styles. Then they can be placed into the Template Center. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: another funny one from ZdNet
On 02/20/2013 04:19 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 02/20/2013 02:52 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:18:44PM +0600, Urmas wrote: The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments have a hilarious amount of FUD in them. One wonders if they have ever even tried either MSO or LO. Most people who own StarOffice or many of its forks don't use it. They just open and print documents with it. If someone tried to actually use it as a word processor, he would find some of 5+ years old bugs and lack of features much earlier. Nowadays there is no free alternative to MS Office suite and costly third-party utilities: spellchecker, bibliography/formula editors and so on. That's a hilarious statement from someone posting to a list dedicated to a free alternative to MS Office. When was the last version released? Are you talking about release of StarOffice or LO? No free alternative to MSO? No spell checkers, etc.? Something is not right somewhere. LO is touted as THE best alternative to MSO. How many spell checking dictionaries do you want? 200+ is my last count, with about 20 localized Spanish ones. My own American English one has over 797,000 words in it. Grammar checkers are the problem, though. No one makes one that works well for all its users. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes
On 02/20/2013 05:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote: At 14:36 20/02/2013 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote: Europe A4 size Perhaps that should be everywhere-in-the-world-except-the-United-States-and-Canada A4 size. Brian Barker I do not know about the rest of the world. I knew that Europe tend to use A4. Why USA and Canada uses letter size when the rest use A4, who knows. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Any plans to incorporate anything from the Lotus Symphony UI?
On 02/19/2013 11:56 AM, Joel Madero wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:44 AM, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote: Hello, I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony UI code to AOO... Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the ribbon in MSO, but would love to see the UI with a decent facelift/refresh... As far as I know there are no such plans. Best Regards, Joel The only thing I heard about this, in the past, was the possibilityof adding Tabbed documents, like you find in browsers using new tab or new window. Adding that might take a lot of work. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes
sorry, should not have popped off like that. Going to a major doctor appointment in an hour or so. I tried to darken the skin, but no matter how dark I make it, it does not look good with light/white text - unless I go very dark. Will make it into a theme and see if it gets approved. On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White text. It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop. So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the default black text. OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and get it approved. Then use that one. On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the other. I put correct in single quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes
You have to define it during the submission process. You give it a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and accent colors for menu text. I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the designer chose the wrong color for the user. I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for the light background. Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that will look good with some colored text. I test my persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them. I do not know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later. Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for your system. My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but a user on this list stated it was not working for them. SO, I decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using white text instead of black. Sorry this does not help you. For me there are a lot of themes out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where the text color was not standing out enough to use. On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so, how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background. On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White text. It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop. So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the default black text. OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and get it approved. Then use that one. On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the other. I put correct in single quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRIl7aAAoJEIefqZ0kni1dCYkP+wXX6+3bpUaZos64bjwiOSUR 3wT5nYfXci8bleCgTF4EJqLJheb4GtETJIVa3Yg01OIAhGKXW+cXT23S2x2RkFo8 3imWG4ecErEa+Se/OWrceeRJSp3ivORVTFXETjXmp0YMUZS4bHH+cxHVYp16npj7 eqZcpna4dwLJAg0K+sGaUcqMG/q2E1E6bVMPWzYtyko50S7FR5qOwgWiNeeZ9hWE tSJ2R/tefSyxI2baFM6cMoXm8IQFI65q8qbLwGkNypK3A8TH4nZ++urBBYttdFCN O04/uVthQR2o+5FT5y1u/AXDGTk6hBHS6nxaO+V2Rq4m31fh+dfPgB+o+IKJLvqw CDS6Z5YKa/oaCqIGeusu2Fj7VH4WKmveU8eTiBdMaj5RD1cvTYuvuvDVfxYFZmhb YzldkiYlLhON1XQ+9tcNU5OKltUbpWVFfLfVxnyZLJdi/3wpk++XtxbBzhBkN7/m bJnCGrmBEboEyELcGNrkQ+X4zuY3GKFPdg5fHFqIgrWBta45AeqsOlBlZlgOvkpD lqBa3TRiEpVJMYjSkgprVFgzXhkzBoKp+IJES8vmLqSbjr2PJFvLQKTdToRep/QN d2W8C2SzL88ri185iwIzcX4f13rAI8cXNSo15F0N6UHJeGSSmCtcUrMWaMeEjXr/ 9V0T35afXW03WevRN7HY =H/GQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes
Edit: Just noticed that LibreOffice does not use the defined text coloring. I do not know where you can change the font color of the menus. So, I wonder why LO is not using the persona/theme menu colors. Since LO's menu text color is black, you will have to use the lighter colored themes. On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: You have to define it during the submission process. You give it a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and accent colors for menu text. I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the designer chose the wrong color for the user. I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for the light background. Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that will look good with some colored text. I test my persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them. I do not know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later. Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for your system. My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but a user on this list stated it was not working for them. SO, I decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using white text instead of black. Sorry this does not help you. For me there are a lot of themes out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where the text color was not standing out enough to use. On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so, how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background. On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White text. It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop. So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the default black text. OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and get it approved. Then use that one. On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the other. I put correct in single quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRIl7aAAoJEIefqZ0kni1dCYkP+wXX6+3bpUaZos64bjwiOSUR 3wT5nYfXci8bleCgTF4EJqLJheb4GtETJIVa3Yg01OIAhGKXW+cXT23S2x2RkFo8 3imWG4ecErEa+Se/OWrceeRJSp3ivORVTFXETjXmp0YMUZS4bHH+cxHVYp16npj7 eqZcpna4dwLJAg0K+sGaUcqMG/q2E1E6bVMPWzYtyko50S7FR5qOwgWiNeeZ9hWE tSJ2R/tefSyxI2baFM6cMoXm8IQFI65q8qbLwGkNypK3A8TH4nZ++urBBYttdFCN O04/uVthQR2o+5FT5y1u/AXDGTk6hBHS6nxaO+V2Rq4m31fh+dfPgB+o+IKJLvqw CDS6Z5YKa/oaCqIGeusu2Fj7VH4WKmveU8eTiBdMaj5RD1cvTYuvuvDVfxYFZmhb YzldkiYlLhON1XQ+9tcNU5OKltUbpWVFfLfVxnyZLJdi/3wpk++XtxbBzhBkN7/m bJnCGrmBEboEyELcGNrkQ+X4zuY3GKFPdg5fHFqIgrWBta45AeqsOlBlZlgOvkpD lqBa3TRiEpVJMYjSkgprVFgzXhkzBoKp+IJES8vmLqSbjr2PJFvLQKTdToRep/QN d2W8C2SzL88ri185iwIzcX4f13rAI8cXNSo15F0N6UHJeGSSmCtcUrMWaMeEjXr/ 9V0T35afXW03WevRN7HY =H/GQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes
Yes, they defined the text to be white, but LibreOffice does not use that color definition, or something like that. LO does not use the footer image, either, is seems. On 02/18/2013 01:57 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmm, I thought it was something in the original skin I've seen it referenced that determined the text color. I use the same persona for Firefox, Thunderbird and LO 4.0. In Firefox and Thunderbird the text in question is white, but in LO it's black. Just for your info, its Star Trek by lolodetahiti. On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: You have to define it during the submission process. You give it a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and accent colors for menu text. I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the designer chose the wrong color for the user. I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for the light background. Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that will look good with some colored text. I test my persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them. I do not know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later. Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for your system. My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but a user on this list stated it was not working for them. SO, I decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using white text instead of black. Sorry this does not help you. For me there are a lot of themes out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where the text color was not standing out enough to use. On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so, how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background. On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White text. It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop. So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the default black text. OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and get it approved. Then use that one. On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the other. I put correct in single quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes
Yes, the Star Trek theme/persona has defined the color of the menu text to white [or there about] and LibreOffice does not pick up the specified font color. IT might be fixed for the next version, but I would think someone will need to make a bug report for it. Maybe then it can be officially addressed as a bug. On 02/18/2013 02:08 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I had replied to your prior post before reading this one so sorry if it comes across a little weird. I did find the link to the specific persona/theme if you want to check it out: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/star-trek-182292/ On 02/18/2013 12:44 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Edit: Just noticed that LibreOffice does not use the defined text coloring. I do not know where you can change the font color of the menus. So, I wonder why LO is not using the persona/theme menu colors. Since LO's menu text color is black, you will have to use the lighter colored themes. On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: You have to define it during the submission process. You give it a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and accent colors for menu text. I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the designer chose the wrong color for the user. I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for the light background. Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that will look good with some colored text. I test my persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them. I do not know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later. Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for your system. My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but a user on this list stated it was not working for them. SO, I decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using white text instead of black. Sorry this does not help you. For me there are a lot of themes out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where the text color was not standing out enough to use. On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so, how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background. On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White text. It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop. So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the default black text. OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and get it approved. Then use that one. On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the other. I put correct in single quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0 Persona/Themes
I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0. http://libreoffice-na.us/libreoffice-reptile-skin-1--lo40-clip.jpg Here are the current Firefox Persona/Themes with the key word of LibreOffice. https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0 I like patterns and other things. So I am working on those right now. If I had some good graphics and photos that might work well as design for LO themes, I might do them as well. I could use some constructive comments though. We all could. Designing a Persona/Theme for Firefox is one thing, but making one that was created for LiberOffice is a different thing. Do we want it to have LibreOffice show as a text image there or just some nice graphics or images? I would be nice to know what our users like for color schemes or background ideas. There are Green, Blue, Orange, Purple, and Yellow colors specified in the Branding Wiki. I am working on green ideas, since I choose a green themed desktop. But if there are others who would prefer Blues or other branded colors, I could work on them. Since LibreOffice does not have any Mascot, but there were ideas on that a while back, I may try my had at that type of image. But it really is up to the users of LO 4.0 to decide what they would like. Actually having you Firefox browser have an LO themed background image for its menu system, would be a form of advertising, it may not be for every one. Let all of us, who want to create these Persona/Themes for LibreOffice [and Firefox], know what you would like to see from use as themes and artwork. -- By the way, it would be easier for people to design these themes, if there was a way to test them like you can do on the Firefox browser. Just a thought. Right now we have to design them and submit them to Firefox for approval. It the new design it too close to one of your other designs or someones else's, it will be rejected. My green rough paper with the LO text was approved, but to just have that background and not text was not since it was too much like the text version. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4
On 02/13/2013 11:31 PM, C. H. D. wrote: Hello! I did not find pixels in LibreOffice: Tools - Options - LibreOffice Draw - General - Unit of measurement That was why I used cm instead. Thanks. Regards, C. H. D. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ snip https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/demo_create This is Firefox's site that walks you through the creation of Persona designs. Since LibreOffice uses their Persona guidelines, currently, I am going by their information. They describe using a header image of 3000 pixels wide by 200 pixels high. The footer size is 3000 pixels by 100 pixels. They also have a file size limit of no more than 300KB for the images [total size of the two combined, I believe]. Now here it the sticking point. Draw seems to want you to create pages, not specific images, like Corel Draw and Inkscape. You must be able to create a specific image size, in pixels, and I do not know how to do that in Draw. I just looked - There is a Pixel definition in the File Export using the exporting to a JPG format. There you can take your design and make it the correct pixel size. All you have to do it make the image proportional to the needed pixel size. Make your page/image be in centimeters and use a box 300 by 20 cm in size for your design area. Then export it to the 3000 by 200 pixels. - - - - What I did when I created a felt texture Persona was this: I created a page wide design using all of the filters and texture-fills that Inkscape has. I played around with them till I got a background image that I liked. That was using vector graphics way of making designs, the way Inkscape and Draw does. Then I exported the design to a bitmap image that is pixel based, like photos are. I made sure it was exported to be at least 3000 pixels wide and 200 high. Then I used a package, like GIMP, Paint Shop Pro, or Photoshop, to do some editing of the image to get the final design to be EXACTLY the 3000 pixel width and the 200 and 100 pixel high required for the Firefox specifications for a Persona. At that point I tested the Persona design, to make sure it did look well and was not interfering with the header and footer menu and icons. If you want to use it for LibreOffice 4.0.x and/or Firefox, you test the design[s] and tweak them before you decide they are working well for you. At that point, currently, you can go through the posting process to get your Persona listed in the Firefox Gallery. It is a simple process. I have asked the question about the approval process and a gallery placement within a LibreOffice page, like we have fore templates and extensions. We need approval if we use the official logo[s] for LibreOffice and TDF. So, look into the Person design specifications on Firefox's page. See if there is a way to create and export an image to a specific pixel size. Since I have not learned how to use Draw properly, I do not know this process. - - - - I use Corel Draw and Inkscape for my vector graphics images and Paint Shop Pro [5] and GIMP for the bitmap/pixel editing work. I use Ubuntu/Linux for my default OS on my desktop that I do most of my work. I use Inkscape and GIMP on them. I do use a Win7 and a Win XP/pro laptop[s] that I have Corel Draw, Inkscape, Paint Shop Pro [5] and GIMP installed on them. I have been using specific packages for specific design processes. Since I have used Paint Shop Pro 5 [and other] for many year before I looked into using any Linux system, I find it easier to use it for some image editing needs. Since I now use Linux for my desktop, I have been learning how it use GIMP for these editing processes. To be honest, right now, I do not know much about Draw's abilities and how to use it properly. It seems to be a vector graphics editor. It would be nice if I learned that package well enough to use it for that, but I know other vector graphic package much better and therefore easier for me to do the needed design work. I have been using some packages since they came out in the Windows 95/98 and XP days. You use what it easier for you to use. Maybe I will take the time to learn how to use Draw as well as I know the other packages, but that is not for the near future. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Strange fonts on my Windows system
On 02/14/2013 05:33 AM, William Drago wrote: All, I have a bunch of fonts on my Windows system that have weird names like cmbx6 Regular, cmdunh10 Regular, cmsltt10 Regular... Did these come with LibreOffice and if so what are they for? Also, why such cryptic names? Thanks, Bill They are system fonts, or so I have been told. Some packages and utilities withinthe Windows system may be using them for displaying text. The Command Line could use them. Some of the windowtext menu and titles displayed may use them. If these fonts were not installed by you, but are shown in you font list, DO NOT REMOVE them. If they are used by Windows or its utilities, you may have a big problem on your hands. I accidentally removed a font that I thought I did not need from an XP system. I did not know that that font name [several fonts styles] was used by Windows. I really had some weird looking menu texts till I fixed the problem. There are a lot of fonts that are installed by Windows, or Linux, that is used only by the system and was not intended to be used as a font in a normal document created by Writer or other package. Even though all of these extra fonts are listed in the font menus, I just avoid them and not delete/uninstall them. You may never know what fonts are being used by the OS or a package. I do know that some packages install specific fonts on your Windows [and Linux] system to be used as their default font[s] in their packages in one way or another. LibreOffice has a set of fonts. When I type in LibreOffice in my Linux package manager I get fonts-opensymbol 2:102.2+LibO. . . listed in the search for LibreOffice. For me, there are many, many fonts that are listed in my font list in Writer, to choose from. Many of them were placed there by Ubuntu [or Windows] when it was installed or one of the packages I installed afterwards. These fonts are not ones I would use in my documents, but I accept that they are there and I should not delete them, no matter how weird they look or are names. I have over 400 fonts and their styles listed in my Writer font drop down option. Many are there as core fonts I use for various projects, and may were placed there when I installed Ubuntu 12.04, MATE desktop environment, and all of the various packages I installed and use. Even though it makes is a pain to go through all of these extra fonts I may never use in a document or project, I will not risk deleting them. I learned this the hard way. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4
In the Persona instructions on the Firefox page that help you through the process, they tell you the exact size of the image files. Also, there are some example download images files to start the process as well. I looked into this last month. What I would do is download the image files they use as examples and then use them. These files are shown in pixels not inches or any other measurement. That is best. On 02/13/2013 03:00 AM, C. H. D. wrote: Hello! Great to share how to make Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4! It is very hard to measure the size of the image to be used in a Firefox Persona. Feel free to learn more about that: Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 http://youtu.be/AZeZzxN83HE After trying many times, I got the right size of the image and submitted the Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4. http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0 For your information, in LibreOffice Draw: Header image Width: 82.00cm or 32.28 Height: 5.52cm or 2.17 Footer image Width: 82.00cm or 32.28 Height: 2.77cm or 1.09 The gradient background is recommended. Regards, C. H. D. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4
Just created a Felt style of a background with the text of LibreOffice. I submitted it and there are 44 in the queue for review. The header was 3000px by 200 px The footer was 3000px by 100px all according to their web page. https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/demo_create Simple and easy. On 02/13/2013 03:00 AM, C. H. D. wrote: Hello! Great to share how to make Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4! It is very hard to measure the size of the image to be used in a Firefox Persona. Feel free to learn more about that: Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 http://youtu.be/AZeZzxN83HE After trying many times, I got the right size of the image and submitted the Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4. http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0 For your information, in LibreOffice Draw: Header image Width: 82.00cm or 32.28 Height: 5.52cm or 2.17 Footer image Width: 82.00cm or 32.28 Height: 2.77cm or 1.09 The gradient background is recommended. Regards, C. H. D. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
On 02/12/2013 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-02-10 10:27 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I do not like all that typing. What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and unarchive it. Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO. That way you do not need to type all of the characters of the folder's name. Never heard of 'tab-completion'? Try hitting the tab key after typing one or two characters of the folder name and see what happens... Never heard of this. Never know of the Tab completion in the Terminal. Does it work with the Terminal that is in GNOME, MATE, Unity, KDE? How about the one that comes with openSUSE and other non-Ubuntu systems. I have been told that Debian and Ubuntu is growing apart so some distros are showing both Ubuntu-based and Debian-based versions. What happens when you have two folders that are similar characters, except some difference? LibreOffice-4.0-installsvs. LibreOffice-3.6-installs? You would have to make sure you go out till the difference? I tend to unarchive all of the downloaded file for my version at the same time. For me, that is just the main install and the help pack. /To be honest, I never really got into doing all that much with the terminal. I prefer to use a GUI to do the work. There are a very large amount of things that the terminal can do that I do not know of, or how to do those things that might help me once and a while. I just never bought or download and GOODand easy to understand reference to what you can do in the terminal. Of course, there are different ways to do things in a Ubuntu/Debian system than you would do the same thing in a openSUSE or RPM system. Different commands and such. // // //I have tried things that others say work for the, but does not work in my install of Ubuntu. That is one reason I have a laptop that has a partition that I use to test new versions of Ubuntu and desktop environments. I do not want to upgrade my 5 TB production desktop and then find that something is not right. I did the upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 on the laptop and it worked fine, but totally crashed on my desktop causing me to need to wipe the system and do a fresh install. I really did not want to have to reinstall all of the packages over again, but in the end I had no choice to do so and move my data files from my external backup drive. That took days to complete./ SO I do not experiment with things on the Terminal, or almost never. I would love to experiment and see about creating a script that would automate the install of LO from an earlier versionusing something like sh libre-update.run and then have it do the removal of the older version and install the newer one. I could place it in the folderthat contains the DEBS folder so it will be version independent. But, if I do something wrong, how bad will it go wrong? So right now I am not going toexperiment that way. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request
On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, John R. Sowden wrote: I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but improvement is an ongoing process. For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be nice to: 1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under tools/options. 2) allow us, in the recent menu, to right click and set certain files to 'permanent' so they will not fifo off the stack. An asterisk (blue?) could act as a visual flag. John I remember seeing some packages that allow you to define the number of recent documents are kept in the queue. I never seen the permanent one, but that would be an interesting thing to have. That way, if you are actively working on editing and updating documents on a regular basis, you do not have them removed from the recent list because you were required to do some other more pressing and time sensitive work. I wonder how it might be done. Also, it would be nice to be able to clear the list from time to time to keep other users of a shared system from snooping into what work you are doing for others. I knows this might dealt with only using user accounts that point to user only folders, but I have worked at places where you did not have that ability of keeping your work away from the other users of the system. Even if you used thumbdrives to store the data files, the other users could access the list of files you worked on. Wiping work history would be a good thing for some. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Changing the LibreOffice icons (Linux)
On 02/12/2013 03:29 PM, IBBoard wrote: I don't know if this is the best place (I couldn't see a developer mailing list outside the internal-focused ones) but here goes. I use LibreOffice on openSUSE Linux. I've got a custom icon set that replaces the application icons for LibreOffice. This works fine for launcher icons, but once the program is running (e.g. I'm editing a file in LO Writer) then the current app icon and the Alt-Tab app switcher use the original icons (upscaled horribly from about 24x24 to 64x64). As best as I can tell, Gnome is honouring the _NET_WM_ICON property of the window, which does show the old style icons when you query it with xprop. I'm not talking about the toolbar icons, which I know there are multiple themes that I can select from, but the actual launcher icon, and the one that Gnome Shell uses to show you which app is running. Is it possible to either a) get LibreOffice to use my theme's icons for _NET_WM_ICON or b) replace some files pre-build, and if so, which ones? I've got an account that already has some repackaged software on the openSUSE Build Service (OBS), so I'm not afraid of patching packages, if that is the only option :) Thanks. Maybe the solution is to include other icon sizes, like 24x24 and 64x64, or maybe larger ones, for those systems that might need or use them. Small, medium, large, and extra-large, icons might work for those who are on systems where you can change the icon size. I think Win7 has only two icon sizes to choose from. I do not remember seeing that option in my Ubuntu/MATE install, though. It could be there and I never seen where the option resides. So, maybe there might be a need for icon sizes other than the two being used already. Debian install[s] show icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png\ icon16x16=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png Could there be an icon24x24 and icon64x64 added to the desktop-integration system? How many systems would work with more than just the default two sizes? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] How can I create a certificate border?
On 02/11/2013 10:22 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: Hi Is there a way to create an elaborate border in LibreOffice/Draw? I'd like to create a certficate. I tried searching for freely-licensed templates for this and didn't find any. Thanks in advance for any help with this. F. Fabian Not finding certificate borders is weird. Last year I need some and I found a lot. This one has a few template background images. http://all-free-download.com/free-vector/free-certificate-template.html Some will require you to print to PDF file and then use Draw to import it to create a JPG background image. But there are solutions. I also have found some in places like OpenClipart.org and other sites. Sometimes there are listed under borders. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
The only typing I do is the cd Lib cd DEBS sudo dpkg -i *.deb cd desktop-integration sudo dpkg -i *.deb[using up arrow till I get to that command] No long folder or file names if you unpack the folder/files via the GUI file manager and archive package, then rename the folder to Lib. I do the same thing for the help packs. I do as little typing as I can. On 02/11/2013 12:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) You don't need to do all that typing anyway. Just press the tab key a few times and the terminal cleverly works out what you are aiming for. It takes a bit of working out how it works at first but it's a real boon once you get used to it. Renaming is not a bad idea though as it clarifies exactly what is what. I thnk it inspired those old mobile phones that had predictive texting wy before smart-phones arrived. Hmmm, thinking about it i wonder what OS they were running! ;) Unfortunately the phones version of predictive text was quite a bit different and a bit of a pita for a lot of people. Dunno how often my phone called my best buddy a cow! This has beena great thread! Thanks all :) It's given me a lot to try out. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 3:27 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb I do not like all that typing. What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and unarchive it. Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO. That way you do not need to type all of the characters of the folder's name. I also do not use the desktop as the storage place fore the unarchived folder[s]. I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager to remove the LO packages from the previous version that was installed. Works well for me. Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] where the dpkg command is needed. Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to run them. That is what I try to do. The only time I do not is when I have a launcher icon to work with on my desktop. I prefer to use the GUI more than the terminal anyways. Easier on my fingers and my typing skills after 3 strokes. So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as I can remember to do/use. On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote: Tom, I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on three machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No issues installing or using it. The bug that made some functions in Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!! *Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:* Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop. Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you the folder LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb Run the following terminal commands to install it: 1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.* 2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb 3. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb 4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the different components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply drag the icons for them over to where you wish to have them in the launcher bar. If you install it in this manner using the official Document Foundation version, and you type libreoffice in the command line, I get the following: The program 'libreoffice' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install libreoffice-common An install as shown above does not have any repository from which it originated. Therefore there aren't any updates, which I understand. If it showed up as an installed program, Ubuntu would try to update the LibreOffice with its own version which would lead to a royal mess!! I did not get a message saying there is a missing package like you did. Don On 02/10/2013 09:59 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Tom I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it. On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice from the command-line by typing in libreoffice I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was missing a package called something like libreoffice-common when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration folders i found there was one! I'm sure it's been there in previous releases?! However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it. So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
I now have the terminal commands in a text document. I keep forgetting the remove command's text. So I just use the package manager to remove the previous version. Maybe there could be a sh libre-update.run type of command made and placed in the archived folder one level up from the DEBS folder. Then all someone needs to so is run one command in the terminal that would do everything else. Make it generic so it would not need changing for every version. Do the same for the RPM installs. How easy would it be then? run one command that will do everything for you so it would not take any other typing, except your password, to get the Linux versions installed. Windows users get one double clicking of the file, plus the custom install options, to install LO. Have a simple single line command to remove the old version of LO and install the new one would be really nice. Still, some Linux users would not like that. It would make my life easier sometimes. On 02/11/2013 12:50 PM, Don C. Myers wrote: Hi All, A simple copy and paste works really well!! No typing necessary. Just make sure you have the file saved as a .txt that you open with GEdit. When I was new to Linux (Ubuntu) and didn't understand anything about what the system was really doing or about the file structure, OpenOffice was updated, and it wasn't going to be included for Ubuntu users until the next update, which was three or 4 months down the road. I ran across this method as a way to update my OpenOffice without waiting. The same thing took place with the next OpenOffice release. Again I found the updated instructions on the Internet. I still use this as it is easy to update computers. I've installed Ubuntu on about 23 or so. It is also easy for a new person to Ubuntu since they don't have to understand changing directories, etc. Simple extract the download to the desktop, and then copy and paste the three commands into the terminal. Don On 02/11/2013 12:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) You don't need to do all that typing anyway. Just press the tab key a few times and the terminal cleverly works out what you are aiming for. It takes a bit of working out how it works at first but it's a real boon once you get used to it. Renaming is not a bad idea though as it clarifies exactly what is what. I thnk it inspired those old mobile phones that had predictive texting wy before smart-phones arrived. Hmmm, thinking about it i wonder what OS they were running! ;) Unfortunately the phones version of predictive text was quite a bit different and a bit of a pita for a lot of people. Dunno how often my phone called my best buddy a cow! This has beena great thread! Thanks all :) It's given me a lot to try out. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 3:27 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb I do not like all that typing. What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and unarchive it. Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO. That way you do not need to type all of the characters of the folder's name. I also do not use the desktop as the storage place fore the unarchived folder[s]. I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager to remove the LO packages from the previous version that was installed. Works well for me. Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] where the dpkg command is needed. Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to run them. That is what I try to do. The only time I do not is when I have a launcher icon to work with on my desktop. I prefer to use the GUI more than the terminal anyways. Easier on my fingers and my typing skills after 3 strokes. So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as I can remember to do/use. On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote: Tom, I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on three machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No issues installing or using it. The bug that made some functions in Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!! *Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:* Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop. Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you the folder LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb Run the following terminal commands to install it: 1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.* 2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb 3. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb 4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the different components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
On 02/11/2013 01:43 PM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2013-02-11 12:50, Don C. Myers a écrit : Hi All, A simple copy and paste works really well!! No typing necessary. Just make sure you have the file saved as a .txt that you open with GEdit. When I was new to Linux (Ubuntu) and didn't understand anything about what the system was really doing or about the file structure, OpenOffice was updated, and it wasn't going to be included for Ubuntu users until the next update, which was three or 4 months down the road. I ran across this method as a way to update my OpenOffice without waiting. The same thing took place with the next OpenOffice release. Again I found the updated instructions on the Internet. I still use this as it is easy to update computers. I've installed Ubuntu on about 23 or so. It is also easy for a new person to Ubuntu since they don't have to understand changing directories, etc. Simple extract the download to the desktop, and then copy and paste the three commands into the terminal. Don This I also agree with as well. If the scripts fit for everyone. However, there is no sense making installing LibreOffice (the downloaded files) sound so complicated for Linux. You don't really need to know much about installing .deb's or .rpm's other than to right-click and the files and picking the right choices. That's all. In fact, if you are just installing one .deb or .rpm, on most systems, you just have to double-click on the .deb or .rpm file and it will call up the distro's installer. It's just that simple. Just like it is done on Windows. Cheers, Marc The only reason you cannot double click any of the .deb files in the install's DEBS folder is the fact that you need to make sure they are all run due to the file dependency issues. They have to be run in a certain order, sort of. It would be nice to have a double-click script that could be run that way that will run all of the .deb file in the folder, but it is not as easy as that, or that single double-clicking file/script might have been created by now. So far, needing the terminal to install packages [not all] is a problem for some users who want to switch from Windows. Also, sometimes the double-clicked package installs do not even make a menu or desktop launcher icon, so you have to go into the bin or other folder and create your own launcher icon. I had to do that for the Canon Scanning package. It was /usr/bin/scangearmp and how many new users to Linux would know how to create a launcher or where the command was stored? More people might move over to Linux if package were easier to install on Ubuntu, Mint, and others. We all got spoiled on doing a double-click on the install file [.exe or .msi] and it will place the package icon in the menu system [Start] and place a launch icon on the desktop for ease of use. Yes, we got spoiled, but it was easier. I do not know how to add the Canon Scan Gear package to the Ubuntu Applications menu. Wish I did. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
On 02/11/2013 05:59 PM, Marc Paré wrote: Hi Tim, Le 2013-02-11 14:04, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : So far, needing the terminal to install packages [not all] is a problem for some users who want to switch from Windows. Also, sometimes the double-clicked package installs do not even make a menu or desktop launcher icon, so you have to go into the bin or other folder and create your own launcher icon. I had to do that for the Canon Scanning package. It was /usr/bin/scangearmp and how many new users to Linux would know how to create a launcher or where the command was stored? Not sure about the other deb software, but we do supply this in our packages, it's in the main packagage-desktop integration -libreoffice4.0-freedesktop-menus-4.0.0-103.noarch. I am not sure if the Ubuntu's Unity adheres to the standard, but Gnome and KDE do. As for getting it on your desktop, grab it and drop on your desktop, you normally get prompted if you want a copy, link. Cheers, Marc The one that is in Ubuntu is named - libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb This is the menu guide I think for Debian desktop-integration. ?package(libreoffice-writer):needs=X11 section=Apps/Editors\ title=LibreOffice 4.0 Writer command=libreoffice4.0 -writer\ hints=Word Processors\ kderemove=y\ icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png\ icon16x16=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png This is for the RPM version you have. There are 3 different ones in the RPM desktop-integration package. ?package(libreoffice4.0-writer): needs=x11 section=Office/Wordprocessors icon=libreoffice4.0-writer.png title=LibreOffice 4.0 Writer longtitle=LibreOffice 4.0 Word Processing Component command=libreoffice4.0 -writer mimetypes=application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-template,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-web,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-master,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer.template,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer.global,application/vnd.stardivision.writer,application/msword,application/vnd.ms-word,application/x-doc,application/rtf kde_opt=InitialPreference=100 startup_notify=true The problem is not getting it on my desktop or panel, but to get a listing in the Applications menu when the package does not list the package in say Applications/Office where it should be listed, but not. I know how to make a launcher icon on the desktop for my Canon Scanner package, but not how to get it in the /Office menu or the /Graphics menu where it should belong. The Canon scanning system will not work with XSane, like my Epson scanner does [since I went to Ubuntu 12.04/12.10]. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
On 02/11/2013 06:14 PM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2013-02-11 17:01, Dan Lewis a écrit : All well and good, but the simple way that you suggest will present problems for the newcomer on Debian OS's. The desktop-integration file will not install if the LO that came with the OS install CD remains: it must be removed. Without doing this, you can not right click on a file and select a LO version to open the file. We used to use Synaptic to remove an installed program or install a program from the Ubuntu repositories. A few years ago Ubuntu no longer included this package manager when it went to using the Unity desktop. (Synaptic was a part of the gnome desktop package.) In its place, Ubuntu introduced the Ubuntu Software Center. It appears that programs can also be removed using it, but only if they came from the Ubuntu repositories. Right now I have LO 3.6.5.2 and 4.0.0.3 installed from the website. Neither of these are listed in Ubuntu Software Center, so it can not be used to remove them. I just checked out your first paragraph. What you wrote does not work for installing LO in Ubuntu. (It probably will not work for any of the Debian OS's, but I only have Ubuntu and can not check the others.) The only thing that works is to think about the specific steps that must be followed and determine how to do them either on the command line or using a script. You may want to call these convoluted, but at least they work. --Dan Thanks for the information Dan. I will install Ubuntu on a spare box and test these out. I for one am for simplifying the notes on the .rpm section and adding a more simplified intallation routine of the 4 steps which do work for users who install the most used default managers as Gnome or KDE managers. We should also try to find a visual installation routine for our Ubuntu users. The vast majority of users are just interested in using the software. Is some wish to install the latest and the bleeding edge versions, we need to make it an easy install. We are looking for more contributors in all of our teams and especially QA. IMO, we should try to get our betas/rc's into the hands of users interested in QA who actually use LibreOffice in a productive way. The installation barrier should not become such a burden that such users would cringe at the very thought of installing these pre-release versions. When doing QA, users are often installing newer version of LibreOffice in a very short order of time. Cheers, Marc I think we need to make it as easy as possible for our users [ Windows/Mac/Linux ] to install the newest version of LO to replace the older ones. I really think it is not Windows vs. Linux, but how we can make it easy for all users, no matter what OS they use. MS has an installer build into the .msi package. We need to do something like that for Linux. HP has a package like sh hplip-3.11.3a.run that is run in the terminal that walks you through the install process for the Linux printing. There are a lot of complex things going on, including a make option in there. How easy would it be to create something like that? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
Tom I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it. On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice from the command-line by typing in libreoffice I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was missing a package called something like libreoffice-common when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration folders i found there was one! I'm sure it's been there in previous releases?! However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it. So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i wanted to try to collect error reports and stuff (ie never). Regards from Tom :) -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb
I do not like all that typing. What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and unarchive it. Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO. That way you do not need to type all of the characters of the folder's name. I also do not use the desktop as the storage place fore the unarchived folder[s]. I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager to remove the LO packages from the previous version that was installed. Works well for me. Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] where the dpkg command is needed. Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to run them. That is what I try to do. The only time I do not is when I have a launcher icon to work with on my desktop. I prefer to use the GUI more than the terminal anyways. Easier on my fingers and my typing skills after 3 strokes. So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as I can remember to do/use. On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote: Tom, I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on three machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No issues installing or using it. The bug that made some functions in Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!! *Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:* Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop. Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you the folder LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb Run the following terminal commands to install it: 1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.* 2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb 3. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb 4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the different components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply drag the icons for them over to where you wish to have them in the launcher bar. If you install it in this manner using the official Document Foundation version, and you type libreoffice in the command line, I get the following: The program 'libreoffice' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install libreoffice-common An install as shown above does not have any repository from which it originated. Therefore there aren't any updates, which I understand. If it showed up as an installed program, Ubuntu would try to update the LibreOffice with its own version which would lead to a royal mess!! I did not get a message saying there is a missing package like you did. Don On 02/10/2013 09:59 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Tom I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it. On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice from the command-line by typing in libreoffice I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was missing a package called something like libreoffice-common when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration folders i found there was one! I'm sure it's been there in previous releases?! However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it. So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i wanted to try to collect error reports and stuff (ie never). Regards from Tom :) -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote: On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote: On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more common font used by publishing houses. I would look into changing the fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use. Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and serif styles? Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows, MacOSX, and Linux OS installs? Or are you asking if there is a font set that can be installed on them? Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents in the other systems. The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have installedon there. If you want your document to work on their systems, with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their documents. Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document could be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged. AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available for both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac. There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be installed on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not worry about an equivalents. The key would be dealing with fonts that are already installed by others, so they do not need to install a new one. Here is a free site http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/ They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats. So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used for Windows, Linux, and MacOSX. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
Original Message Subject:Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:52 +0100 From: Claude Fiefel claude.fie...@orange.fr To: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com un conseil prenez donc un traducteur en français for me finish libre office ok Le 8 févr. 2013 à 14:53, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com a écrit : On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote: On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote: On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more common font used by publishing houses. I would look into changing the fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use. Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and serif styles? Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows, MacOSX, and Linux OS installs? Or are you asking if there is a font set that can be installed on them? Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents in the other systems. The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have installedon there. If you want your document to work on their systems, with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their documents. Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document could be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged. AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available for both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac. There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be installed on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not worry about an equivalents. The key would be dealing with fonts that are already installed by others, so they do not need to install a new one. Here is a free site http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/ They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats. So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used for Windows, Linux, and MacOSX. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org mailto:users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
The French email to me was the second emain [different addresses] that had the tag like that looked like they used an iPad to send it. It decided to forward it to the list so someone who might know what should be done with the emails. On 02/08/2013 10:02 AM, sun shine wrote: On 08/02/13 14:54, Tom Davies wrote: HI :) The French website is here http://fr.libreoffice.org/ and their wiki is here https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page/fr but i don't understand enough to find the equivalent of this page http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Regards from Tom :) From: Dries Feys dries.f...@tvh.com To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk Cc: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com; LibreO - Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 14:42 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning I'm willing to take contact with him. Can anyone give me the links to the french lists unsubscribe info? Met vriendelijke groeten, Salutations distinguées, Kind Regards, DRIES FEYS CORPORATE SERVICES • Specialist Software Developer On 8 February 2013 15:40, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi :) I am not sure what the French chap was saying. Anyone know? Can anyone help? The problem for me is trying to guess which fonts other people have on their machines. I carefully installed the font called Ubuntu and it's derivatives (bold, and so on) on all my colleagues machine's and my various bosses. So it's ok for use inside our offices and for printing but when i need to send it outside it gets tricky. So i generally stick to the MS fonts that 'everyone' has for documents that are going out. It would be nice to have a slightly nicer version of some of them and the screen-fonts used in Xp and Win7 but although Tim at Kracked Press has tried to help me i still find it a bit of a pain as i have to walk around and install on each separate machine. There must be some faster route but i don't know it yet. Regards from Tom :) From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com To: LibreO - Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 14:23 Subject: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning Original Message Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:52 +0100 From: Claude Fiefel claude.fie...@orange.fr To: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com un conseil prenez donc un traducteur en français for me finish libre office ok Le 8 févr. 2013 à 14:53, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com a écrit : On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote: On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote: On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more common font used by publishing houses. I would look into changing the fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use. Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and serif styles? Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows, MacOSX, and Linux OS installs? Or are you asking if there is a font set that can be installed on them? Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents in the other systems. The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have installedon there. If you want your document to work on their systems, with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their documents. Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document could be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged. AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available for both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac. There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be installed on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not worry about an equivalents. The key would be dealing with fonts that are already installed by others, so they do not need to install a new one. Here is a free site http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/ They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats. So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used for Windows, Linux, and MacOSX. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting
Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas
There are a lot of persona[s] I have tried for Firefox that did not work for me. Same will go for LO 4.0.0. There is some easy instructions on the FF site to help people create your own persona[s]. I may be creating a version myself, specifically working for LO 4.0.0. If I do, I will place it on the FF so if you search for LibreOffice, you will find it. The hardest thing is deciding what you want the top menu bar to look like and doing the image editing. After that it is a very simple process. So simple, that there many thousands of them out there. On 02/08/2013 10:23 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) The girl/lady reading the script has used LibreOffice a couple of times but really had no idea how to do the things she was reading about and still doesn't know. To be fair neither do i but she has a nice voice so i might listen to it enough to work out what it's about. It might even help me with my work as i use a CMS (one i find a bit of a pita tbh) quite frequently. The main point is that if articles are promoting the CMIS thing then it would be sensible if they gave a link to further info about it and all i know is that video. So, i am trying to give the link in the comments section in some of the articles Italo gave us links to. It's interesting to hear about a 2minute rule. I guessed at 3 minutes a couple of months ago so it's good to know i wasn't tooo far off. Hopefully for that video, people watching will mostly be advanced users ready to commit to the full 5mins and the nice voice might help keep them focused. Regards from Tom :) From: C. H. D. webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk To: LibreOffice User Support Mailing List users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 15:04 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas Hello! I have just watched the video provided: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2bbnyAjMeMfeature=youtu.be I think this video is tidy. (I have not used CMIS.) The voice is nice. I think I have kept my video as short as about two minutes. I think people will not have the patience. (Most people I know do not have patience.) I also feel that two minutes is the key. If a video is longer than that, then the process must be very long. Very serious users will spend more than two minutes on watching such a long video. If I need to use CMIS tomorrow (being very nervous), I will need to know how to do it as soon as possible. I suggest giving the audience the most important steps first. The link mentioned is for more advanced users, I believe. Regards, C. H. D. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 寄件人︰ Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk 收件人︰ C. H. D. webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk 傳送日期︰ 2013年02月8日 (週五) 1:03 PM 主題︰ Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas Hi :) Nicely done :) Have you sent it to the documentation mailing list? They might be interested in putting it on their page of video tutorials. Btw have you seen this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2bbnyAjMeMfeature=youtu.be that uses an unusual sound-track and a minimalist voice to help keep people's attention? I've seen a lot of YouTube HowTos that have sound-tracks that quickly get very out-dated by choosing music that is very fashionable but that lacks class. I don't like the particular piece of music in that link i just gave but i do like the way that it's unusual enough that people are unlikely to have heard it before and certainly not enough to get tired of it. Also a lot of times videos have constant chatter going on, often without really adding adding anything useful. Lots of umm and ahh and Here you can see that i am doing or As you can see. The constant flow of words makes it difficult to translate and yet keep the timings good. What i really liked about the voice in the link i gave was that the speaking parts were short and distinct so that when it was translated from Danish into English the chap was able to chop up Pamela's voice and place the comments in exactly the right places. So, Pamela only had to leave decent pauses between statements. She didn't have to get the pauses exactly right because Leif was going to chop up the voice-audio and place the parts appropriately to fit the video and the music. I think the only thing missing is an srt file under the video so that people could download the srt and the video in order to see the subtitles. Alternatively just some way people could get the script in some other text format. Either way something for blind users to be able to get through their screen-readers. Anyway i really just wondered what you thought of the link. Have you done a lot of these sorts of things? Yours looked like you knew what you were doing. If you do write a script i might be able to get Pamela or another lady to read it for you as long as the script was quite short and
Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote: On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more common font used by publishing houses. I would look into changing the fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use. Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and serif styles? Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows, MacOSX, and Linux OS installs? Or are you asking if there is a font set that can be installed on them? If the first, then not likely, since Windows changes it default installed fonts for every version and last I knew MAC did not have the same font names as Windows. Not if you want to install a font on Windows, MacOSX, and Linux, well that is different. I do not know if MacOSX will install TTF fonts, or OTF type, but I know that there are font sites where you can find fonts listing both MAC and Windows versions. Linux should be able to install TTF and OTF fonts like Windows, at least my Ubuntu/Linux does. So, all you have to do is find a font that works on MAC and Windows, and it should work for Linux. Then you just install them on all three platforms. Well, that said, there is a harder way. Go through all of the documentation on which fonts are installed with which versions of Windows and MAC. Then look at chart that list which fonts on MAC are the same as the ones on Windows, but have different names of the MAC system. Then go from there. I do not have MAC, but I have a core set of fonts that I make sure are installed on my Windows andLinux systems. THEN, if I need to send documents out to others, I embed the fonts in those documents. Most PDF printer drivers, like CUPS-PDF [Linux] and doPDF [Windows] will embed the fonts used into the file so the viewer of the document will see it the way you wanted it to be. The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have installedon there. If you want your document to work on their systems, with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their documents. LO, well their PDF exportation system was working on embedding all the fonts, instead of just some. I do not know how far along it is but it is not the easiest thing to do. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 4.0 Unity Integration in Ubuntu 12.04
On 02/07/2013 10:59 AM, Paddy Landau wrote: Jay Lozier wrote Paddy Landau wrote According to the New Features page ... Unity Integration is built in. Sadly, this is not working for me. Did you install LO manually? ... cd desktop-integration ... The installation process is now completed, and you should have icons for all the LibreOffice applications in your desktop's Applications/Office menu. Thank you for your reply, but this was not what I was referring to. I was referring to the Unity menu-bar integration. If you look at the New Features page https://www.libreoffice.org/download/4-0-new-features-and-fixes , about halfway down (under the title GUI), you will see a screen-shot of the Unity Integration. Since my last posting, I have been informed that perhaps it may not work in Ubuntu versions prior to the current Alpha version (13.04), so perhaps it will not work in 12.04? There has been a lot of updates lately for 12.04, even some Unity ones. I run MATE instead of Unity. Maybe 12.10 works better. I am running it on my testing laptop [but with MATE as well], but run 12.04/MATE for my default desktop system. I do see the Unity Integration box you are referring to. My question seem to be what it the current state of the Unity Integration for the 12.04/12.10 versions. How much has been changed between 3.6.5 and 4.0.0 that affected the integration, other than the addition of persona to the UI? I wonder why the integration will not work with 12.xx since that it the current version of Ubuntu? It what you was given was true, why would they work on doing the work on the OS version that is not even out? Does not make sense. I waited a long time before I went from 10.04 LTS to 12.04LTS, just before 12.10 came out. So if the next LTS is 14.04LTS, then there will be a lot of Ubuntu users [Unity or others] that will be still using 12.xx for another year or so. Now work for 12.xx, does not make sense. It needs to work and not make you wait till 13.04 or later. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 4.0 Unity Integration in Ubuntu 12.04
Why not make sure that the version of LO work for the current Long-Term-Support version of Ubuntu Unity? I do not use Unity, since I do not like it. But There will be a lot of Unity users who will want LO to work with their 12.04LTS version till the next LTS comes out. I did not use 11.04/11.10 but waited till 12.04LTS. Is there any way to make sure that LO works with 12.04LTS, 12.10, 13.04, and then 13.10? Right now, articles state Mint Linux [MATE or Cinnamon] is more popular than Ubuntu/Unity [and the other desktop environments for it]. But if we turn off some of our Linux users, then where will it stop after that? I use Ubuntu, but I hate Unity so I do not use it. BUT, many people love Unity and those people are most likely LO users and really would be upset if the specific Unity menu system will not work with LO. On 02/07/2013 01:40 PM, Paddy Landau wrote: krackedpress wrote … How much has been changed between 3.6.5 and 4.0.0 that affected the integration, other than the addition of persona to the UI? … I wonder why the integration will not work with 12.xx since that it the current version of Ubuntu? … why would they work on doing the work on the OS version that is not even out? Good questions, and I think I know the answers. Canonical tends to freeze applications for a specific version, releasing updated versions only if needed for security. Firefox, Chromium and Thunderbird are the only exceptions due to their unusual release mechanisms. I believe that there have been large changes to the core code of Unity between 12.04 and 12.10, and further changes to 13.04. So, that could explain it: Canonical created package lo-menubar for Unity, but it works (badly) only on LibreOffice 3.5 if I remember correctly. It does not work on later versions, and indeed conflicts with them. krackedpress wrote So if the next LTS is 14.04LTS, then there will be a lot of Ubuntu users [Unity or others] that will be still using 12.xx for another year or so. Now work for 12.xx, does not make sense. It needs to work and not make you wait till 13.04 or later. Well, that's Canonical's way. You can either upgrade every six months to a new Ubuntu version, or stick with the LTS. The structure is there to cater for the home users who like to keep up-to-date (non-LTS) and the business and corporate users who prefer longer-term stability (LTS). I tend to stick with the LTS for stability, but because I use Libre Office extensively, I prefer to keep Libre Office updated especially when earlier versions have bugs. Conclusion: Given all the comments that have been given on this thread (and some more that I received off-list), I believe we can conclude that it won't work before 13.04. I'll just have to wait for 14.04 before using the Unity Integration. Fortunately, it is not a big deal. We can live with it. Thank you everyone for your responses — they have been helpful. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-4-0-Unity-Integration-in-Ubuntu-12-04-tp4035137p4035233.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more common font used by publishing houses. I would look into changing the fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use. I am a font guy, or use to be. I have collected over 14 GB of font files, but I have a core set of fonts that I place on every system that I own. These are the ones I use the most over the years. Right now, I am reading a hard cover book that has a different font than the paper-back font of the previous version in that series. The kerneling and line spacing is much different than the paperback books. So, with that in mind, you will need to know what the publication will look like and use the best font that works for it. If a publisher uses a specific set of fonts, use them. If not, then it is up to you to choose the best font for the document. I sometimes take a paragraph and repeat it over and over again and then make each paragraph a different font. I then take it to friends who help me decide which font works the best for them. After that, I take the final choices and make 2-3 page examples of the text with those fonts at the size and page format that the document will be published. Then which one is best, I use. Professionals tend to do something like this and then stick with a small core of fonts that work the best for their publications and their different page size. Since each proportional font is a little different and their kerneling aspect seems to be different from others, you mush go through some process to select the best font for your documents. There are thousands of fonts that look like Times Roman, each just a little different. Once you find and test the fonts, you then keep the best ones for your work. The hard part is the testing of each of them to get the best ones. That is why I suggested asking the publisher[s], if possible, which font[s] they prefer to use, since they would have done such visual font tests before and chosen the best ones. On 02/05/2013 04:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I think LaTeX is far more sophisticated for proper professional printing. My guess would be that commercial publishing houses convert from Writer or Word into LaTeX (or something) and then perhaps reapply formatting. Kerning is the least of the problems when you look at a document created in Word. Even so-called Desktop Publishing tools such as Publisher tend to mangle things quite badly. The quality of documents created with Writer is far far higher but it's still unlikely to compete with proper DTP tools such as LaTeX. As a work-around it might be worth trying out a few different fonts and see which bothers you the least. Most people don't notice the other prolific problems created by MSO, let alone kerning or other spacing issues. It is always possible that someone on this list has some clever way of dealing with kerning or even avoiding it. I have a feeling there is a way so poking around in the Format menu might be useful. So, i really am hoping we do get a better answer here Regards from Tom :) From: e-letter inp...@gmail.com To: users users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 8:13 Subject: [libreoffice-users] character kerning Readers, The classic text 'lorem ipsum...' shows how kerning of characters in writer is poor (compared to LaTeX anyway): Lorem ipsum dolor sit _amet_, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad _minim_ _veniam_, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. If the text above is copied into writer, for a font such as 'liberation serif', examples of poor character kerning are indicated by the underscore (_) character. Any way to improve this? -- LO35413 -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0
Many months ago, there was a notification that MSO2013 changed their XML formatting from a loose to a strict version of the format. I do not remember the exact wording but they stated that MSO2010 may not read MSO2013 files correctly. So that makes 3 releases of MSO on Windows that are not compatible with MS's own XML based formats. EVERY time they release a new version, since 2007, they require the user to buy the new version to be compatible. They there is the big hike in buying their office suite, since renting will give MS more income from the same user. You get a lower up-front cost but a higher total cost when you rent MSO. All this incompatibility is just a scheme to increase their income. As for rendering differences between different versions of Windows, XP through Win7, yes MS admits that as well. Between different font bundles and differences in how the OS does it rendering, I do not know what the differences are, but I have seen the differences myself sometimes. I ran XP/pro and Vista. Now I have XP/pro and Win7/pro. Yes, sometimes documents look a little different between the two MS OSs. Since I use Ubuntu/Linux for my main desktop, and I have not bought a MSO package since 2003, I rarely have to deal with working with MSO myself, which I enjoy. On 02/05/2013 09:10 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Only MS Office 2007 and 2010 are available on Mac. They are re-named as 2008 and 2011 but basically are pretty much the same. However there are compatibility issues with documents produced on one platform and then viewed on the other. Documents produced with 2007 don't always look at all right on 2010 let alone 2011. If produced in 2010 on Win Xp then even MS admits they wont look right on 2010 on Win7, nor Win8. Their idea of 'compatibility' is that everyone must be using the same version on the same OS. Also while a student may not be considered to need various different parts of MSO it is still often claimed that moving away from MSO might be a bad idea for them because it means doing without those apps that are not even included in their version of MSO. Then there are tons of other bundles that each lack different parts of the whole suite. Again the missing parts are used as reasons why people can't migrate away from MSO. I have just been helping 2 students on courses that are allegedly trying to teach about computers and the Access module parts were particularly tricky as they didn't have Access at home despite having bought the version of MSO that the colleges recommended. So many different bundles = so much confusion. Rtf is no longer being actively developed. Also, as is typical of MS formats, it fails to be compatible between different programs or even same programs on different OSes, let alone different platforms. I've never yet met any office worker using Biff. Almost all serious servers run non-MS platforms. Somewhere around 1%. Mostly it's small company servers but again they tend to go with unix-based platforms because of security issues. Mobile devices seem to almost entirely run non-MS. The Slate's sales have been appallingly lower than estimated. The only person i know of that has run a Windows phone found it started crashing after just 2 weeks and at best is suffering slowdowns already. All the 3rd party tools for reading documents that are in MS formats tend to be better at displaying LibreOffice documents because it's usually their native format too. Regards from Tom :) From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 14:07 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0 Tom Davies: On the other hand MS Office still does not support many features of LibreOffice yet either. Like custom toolbar backgrounds? I think people can live without those. For example the Student's version of MSO doesn't include Publisher or Access. Why does a student need Publisher? Why does they need Access when they can have the real SQL server for free? Plus their default formats ... only really work on desktop machines. Both BIFF and RTF are trivially parsed and can be used on servers as well. Will MSO ever catch up on security or cross-platform compatibility? There are third-party solutions which handle Office documents on mobile devices. The two only desktop platforms, Windows and MacOSX are both using MSO. What compatibility? -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?
Re: [libreoffice-users] spelling + grammar checker in writer
I believe there has been some work on the Spell Checking system since then, but I could be wrong. I use to use the OOo extension that changed to a different system, but I stopped doing that in the 3.5.x series/line. To be honest, you might see some improvements with the 3.6.5 version of the Debian installs. There are some items in the ToolsOptions section about how and what is used for the spell checking. You might want to play around with those settings to see if things improve for you. Words with numbers and Capitals lettering are listed there in the options for spell checking. Depending on what is installed on your system, the options may be different than mine. I came from OOo 1.x era for my first non-MSO package since I switch to MSO-95. I started using LO with its first offering. - - Your description of the killing of manual formatting is something I have never seen. You are saying that you have formatted words in things like Bold, Italic, and other text and paragraph formatting styles, and the spell checking system is changing them as its works? Weird. I would be upset as well. Since 3.5.3 is old for a LO version, maybe you should download and install the 3.6.5 Debian version of LO from the web pages. If the problem still is there than it is a matter for the developers need to deal with through the bug process. Sometimes the renaming of the .libreoffice hidden folder will help, since it resets the user profile, which sometimes gets messed up and caused some weird errors. Sometimes weird printer errors are caused by the profile being corrupted in some manner. Sometimes checking or unchecking options in the ToolsOptions menus might fix the issue. It did for a weird duplex problem for some printers. Since the issue you are having has been with the OOo/LO projects for that long, you might want to make a list of all of the extensions and add-ons you are using and then including that with a bug report to the devs. As I stated, I use to use a OOo extension that worked with the spell checking system and modified it for more options than OOo and LO had in those early days. Now I do not. I really hope the developers, via the bug reporting system, can help you. On 02/04/2013 01:58 AM, Walther Koehler wrote: Am Samstag, 2. Februar 2013 schrieb webmaster-Kracked_P_P: On 02/02/2013 07:30 AM, Walther Koehler wrote: Hello web-m, hello list, Thank you for your reply. I am using / have been using different Linux Debian Versions and OO from 2.* on up to LO 3.5.3 and I have seen no different behaviour in the grammar and spelling checker. If I insert/delete a letter outside the red marking, the next word to be corrected ist only partially marked red. i.e. cONFUXION (capitals = red marked) LO might offer as a better replacement confusion, clicking on change gives cconfusion A paragraph might be formatted as standard. Some words are in addition hard formatted as bold. As soon as I do some manual correction outside the red-marked words, the checker starts over checking that paragraph an killing all hard formats. Walther Hi folks, I am using the spelling and grammar checker quite often. However, there are some nasty drawbacks (in all versions of OO and LO I know): - any manual correction outside the (red marked) word will result in either reevaluation of the whole paragraph, loss of hard formats in that paragraph and/or a shift in the red mark of the follwing words to be corrected. This means, the red formatted text might cover only part of the word to be corrected. Thus, correction will fail. Yours Walther I have not i\encountered this partial covering of the word with the red markings. Please tell up which version of LibreOffice you are using and what is you Operating System. The correction that fails - do you mean the failure of the spell checking system to correctly pick up the word, or are you talking about failure to pick up the grammar issues? Loss of hard formatting in the paragraph? could you give an example please. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggests
On 02/03/2013 07:58 AM, Roberta wrote: Can you make libreoffice's interface more similar to the office 2013 one's? Another thing... why doesn't artwork work on writer??? If LO gets too similar to MSO's user interface, then MS could take TDF to court for infringements to their look and feel of their office packages. Their pocked change is in the millions of dollars for legal fees to push any company away from looking too much like what they do. MS and Apple have patented things like finger movements. The pinch and page turning movements are patented by Apple so if they wanted, they could take EVERY tablet company to court to prevent them from using it. MS has patents like that. They could claim it and take a small company to court and break that company with legal fees. MS has done that before. SO I do not want LO to look like MSO. Actually I do not like MSO's ribbon look and feel. I do not like MS Win8's tablet icon style of desktop, just like I do not like Unity's look and feel for Ubuntu [kept Ubuntu but switched to MATE d.e.]. The user interface designers did a lot of work to make it easy to use and to stay away from anything that might make a different office package company fee like we stoletheir designs. --- The artwork on Writer? Are you talking about MSO's clipart system? Patented, I believe. If the individual clipart file are not working with Writer, well that is a different question all together. Give us an example of the file mime type [.jpg, .png, .pic, .gif, .tif, and others] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/CheatSheets This is not finished, but on that page you will see a list of image file types that LO uses. Many of the older file types are no longer used my most of the market. I have some old Corel Draw clipart that I am converting over to other formats soLO, GIMP, and other image working package can deal with them. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] spelling + grammar checker in writer
On 02/02/2013 07:30 AM, Walther Koehler wrote: Hi folks, I am using the spelling and grammar checker quite often. However, there are some nasty drawbacks (in all versions of OO and LO I know): - any manual correction outside the (red marked) word will result in either reevaluation of the whole paragraph, loss of hard formats in that paragraph and/or a shift in the red mark of the follwing words to be corrected. This means, the red formatted text might cover only part of the word to be corrected. Thus, correction will fail. Yours Walther I have not i\encountered this partial covering of the word with the red markings. Please tell up which version of LibreOffice you are using and what is you Operating System. The correction that fails - do you mean the failure of the spell checking system to correctly pick up the word, or are you talking about failure to pick up the grammar issues? Loss of hard formatting in the paragraph? could you give an example please. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
On 02/02/2013 01:01 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: Bug fdo#60177 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60177 resolved as invalid after successful installation and printer function. Anyone experiencing similar printer configuration issue on LibreOffice for Windows upgrade to 4.0.0.3 RC3, i.e. Print dialogs show no printers, please capture installation log and user profile and reopen this bug to post them. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4034001.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Maybe you should let people know how to capture that log. If I know how to do it, after I had the problem, I would have given it to the bug reporting process. I have been installing LO since its earliest days and no not know how to capture the log wile doing a normal install, not a command line install like I finally did to get it working. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
Lets make it easier for people than dealing with a bug report process. Make it a place where you will find info to save or get before you make a bug report. I had to make an account to get into the bug reporting system. How many people do you want to do that and then search for answers? On 02/02/2013 06:38 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I think https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport already has something about how to get an strace or something in Windows. Perhaps somewhere in that page would be good. Regards from Tom :) From: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Saturday, 2 February 2013, 22:30 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER Tim, Good idea. I'll poke around on the Wiki's and see if I can find a good spot to insert it. Of course folks would then need to realize they'd need to look in the Wiki to get the information on how to capture a log of the install if they're having problems with a Windows installation. Suspect it will go under the how-to submit a bug Wiki content. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4034029.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop. It will not show anyprinters at all. Claims there is noneis installed. 4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not. This is a Show Stopper. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
On 02/01/2013 03:44 PM, Joel Madero wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop. It will not show anyprinters at all. Claims there is noneis installed. 4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not. This is a Show Stopper. Crap, can you open a bug report on free desktop. Our QA team will investigate. Best Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com mailto:jmadero@gmail.com Never opened a bug report before, if I remember correctly. Do you want me to send you a screen clip of what it looks like off list? I have not installed .3 on any Ubuntu systems yet, but will go back to .2 for Win7. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
On 02/01/2013 03:48 PM, Joel Madero wrote: Never opened a bug report before, if I remember correctly. Do you want me to send you a screen clip of what it looks like off list? I have not installed .3 on any Ubuntu systems yet, but will go back to .2 for Win7. I believe you ;) We just need a bug report so we can escalate this immediately. https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/ BSA is pretty straight forward to report. You can send me a screenshot if you want, I'll take a look. Best Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com mailto:jmadero@gmail.com Bug Reported print dialog screen photo added 4.0.0.2 reinstalled over top of .3, needed to do the repair since it would not run after the initial install of .2 over .3. After I did the repair 4.0.0.2 works fine and prints fine. Whatever the bug is, it happened when during the .3 changes. I have NOT, tried 4.0.0.3 or .2 on any other OS besides Win7 64-bit. I only have Win7 [64-bit], WinXP[32-bit], Ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 64-bit and 10.04 32-bit. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
Well, I installed .2 back over .3 and the printers were there - same profile unless 4.0.0.2 resets the profile when installed. Just installed .3 on a WinXP laptop. Did not get the problem. Got notice that is is not a show stopper, but major high, since it could not be duplicated. Since you said it was already reported before I did today, then I must not be the only one that gets this error with Win7. On 02/01/2013 05:27 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: Its already been posted as fdo#60177 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60177 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4033822.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER
On 02/01/2013 07:09 PM, Dave Barton wrote: webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop. It will not show anyprinters at all. Claims there is noneis installed. 4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not. This is a Show Stopper. Just installed 4.0.0.3 over 4.0.0.2 on a Win 7 laptop and printing works perfectly. Sorry mine did not. XP install over 3.6.4 worked fine though. have gone back to .2 and will do a command line install in the morning [or so] and see about it then. One thing though, my laptop told me I could not uninstall .3 since I was not the administrator, even though I did a clean install of Win7 and I am the only user account ever created on it. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 3.6.5 come out the same week as MSO 2013.
On 01/29/2013 09:41 AM, Urmas wrote: It is weird that a version of LO comes out the same week as the newest MSO after a 3 year wait between versions. I am glad LibreOffice does not make you wait 2 or 3 years between versions. And I would be glad if LO ever obtain the feature parity with MSO 2003. But apparently it requires actual work instead of bumping version numbers. Although this thread, which I started is not for the MSO/LO debate, I will rebut you comment. This debate will be better to have its own thread, like many others in the past about this same subject of parity of features. The big issue I have with that statement is - if LibreOffice was to have the same features that MSO has, then it would be a massive bloated software. The figures I have been given is that 99% of MSO's features are used by less than 1% of its users. Maybe one day LibreOffice will have an extended version with all of the features MSO has, but that is unlikely. Well, LO could have these features. They could be done by the extensions idea. That is what it was created for. It gives developers the ability to create more functions for LO to be added as needed. I have seen something in the lists that make me believe that the 4.0.x line will make it easier to add these extended functions to LO. The original concept, IMHO, is that LibreOffice was never going to be a clone of MSO. TDF did not want to push the developers to make LO have all of the functions that makes MSO a bloated and slower package to start up. The last time I used MSO, it took almost 5 minutes to start up completely to the point where I could edit the text. LibreOffice does this in a few seconds on the same system. ALSO, if you have all of those functions, then you will need to deal with all of them when you do a big UI modification or other base code modification, to make sure it all works properly. That is one reason why MSO takes years between versions. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] a LibreOffice 4 article
LibreOffice 4.0: The big changes will be under the hood Summary: There's a new major version of open-source LibreOffice office suite on its way, but developers, not end-users, will be the ones who will notice the real changes. Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols for Linux and Open Source | January 27, 2013 -- 21:12 GMT (13:12 PST) http://www.zdnet.com/libreoffice-4-0-the-big-changes-will-be-under-the-hood-710383/ -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Drop Caps Character Style in Writer
On 01/27/2013 02:07 PM, Kevin O'Brien wrote: I was working on understanding Character Styles in Writer, and it seems mostly straightforward. But I noticed that the Drop Caps style does not seem to do anything at all. Is that a bug or am I misunderstanding something here? Thanks, What are you trying to do? subscript of a smaller sized character or do the same with a full size character? Uncheck the Automatic box next to the Raise/lower by box. The full size character will lower the given persentage with the Subscript option checked. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Drop Caps Character Style in Writer
On 01/27/2013 03:35 PM, Brian Barker wrote: At 14:07 27/01/2013 -0500, Kevin O'Brien wrote: I was working on understanding Character Styles in Writer, and it seems mostly straightforward. But I noticed that the Drop Caps style does not seem to do anything at all. Is that a bug or am I misunderstanding something here? I'm guessing here, but I think I can see its usefulness. You set drop caps as a property of your paragraph or paragraph style, of course. You may not wish the dropped cap to have the same character style as the rest of the paragraph text. So the Drop Caps tab of the Paragraph or Paragraph Style dialogue gives you the opportunity to select a separate character style to be applied to the dropped caps themselves. I'm guessing that the Drop Caps character style is provided as a convenient style to use for this purpose: you can select it in the paragraph or paragraph style properties and then set the character properties that you want in the Drop Caps character style. You could alternatively create your own character style(s), of course. But that's true of all the predefined styles. I trust this helps. Brian Barker I have seen this done with books. the take the first character of the first paragraph of a chapter and use a larger or different font style of character. They have been doing this thing since the early days of printing. Some people call this type of thing illumination or something like that. Many times the that first character is in color or some really fancy font style [as we call it now]. There are some really interesting things that can be done with Writer and its font/text styling, but I know only a few of them. Sometimes it is easier for me to do it with graphic images or changing the font, but sometimes it is harder that way. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Printing Envelopes
I use Ubuntu 12.04 and a HP Laserjet 2300dn I have add three different drivers to test out for that printer. Did the same for an Epson inkjet. I have [my text name for description] the following drivers. I do not remember which HP/Linux defaults to for this printer. HP Laserjet 2300 Foomatic Postscript HP Laserjet 2300 hpijs PL3 HP Laserjet 2300 CUPS Gutenprint lsb3.2-v5.27 Each of these show different options in the printing dialogs. Also each seems to have a different quality of printing of the sample test page with text and graphics. I chose the CUPS Gutenprint, since it seems the best print quality and the better print options for this duplexing printer. As for the Envelope, does your printer have an envelope tray? Or do you use the manual tray that centers the paper from letter to postcard widths? I have one HP printer that does not center the envelopes, and it uses an envelope feeder tray that is left justified to the printer face of the page. My Epson also uses a left justified, but the Canon uses the centered. I do think that the pstoraster is the issue though. You need to find a better driver, either a newer one from HP or try the CUPS Gutenprint driver. I have no idea what that pstoraster filter/driver could be. Slackware is RPM, correct? Also is 13.1 the newest? Did the envelope printing work in 12.x or 11.x? Every time Ubuntu's update manager system downloads and installs a new hplip, CUPS, or other printer file/driver upgrade, I seem to need to delete and reinstall my printers. They never seem to fully work properly after an automatic upgrade download/install. Sometimes I loose the connection to those network printers and it acts like they do not exist. SO, long winded statement . . . Please try downloading the newest hplip/driver installer script from the HP/Linux page. http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-LaserJet_5 Full List of HP printers http://www.openprinting.org/printers/manufacturer/HP/ NOTE: Before I buy a new or re-manufactured printer, I first look for Ubuntu/Debian drivers and how much the ink/toner will cost me. The non-OEM toner for this laser printer costs about $35 shipped when the HP's original one is over $120. Had to look far and wide for the Canon inkjet printer. Canon USA does not support or have Linux drivers, but Canon UK does. The Epson inkjet has a driver in the OpenPrinting.org list[s]. The Canon ink costs $180+ for 2 full sets, while a good non-OEM 2 full sets cost about $35 with shipping included. The Canon uses - Black, Big Black, Gray, Yellow, Magenta, Cyan. The Epson uses - Black, Yellow, Magenta, Light Magenta, Cyan, Light Cyan. So you see it is impo0rtant to find out how much it will cost a person to get the ink/toner. On 01/24/2013 10:21 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote: Rich, I am using CUPS with my HP Laserjet 8150DN and I have no trouble printing #10 envelopes in LO. So, it is possible. pstoraster is a printer driver that converts Postscript to rastor, the printer page. That implies that you are not using the Laserjet's Postscript emulation (missing option?), which would not need the pstoraster conversion. CUPS has several driver options to select from, such as Foomatic, Gutenprint, or in my printer's case, a CUPS driver (HP Laserjet 8150 Series Postscript (en)). You may try adding the same printer as a different name using different drivers to experiment with. I see on my Slackware 12.2 Linux CUPS that there are only Gutenprint or Foomatic drivers for the LJ5. However, HP has produced more then one model 5 over the years, so I am not sure which one you have. Here is a place I go for Linux printer information: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting http://www.openprinting.org/printers When I select the HP Laserjet 5, the result says it works perfectly. It also says you should be using the hplip (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) driver. Hope this helps. Girvin Herr Rich Shepard wrote: Running LO-3.5.5.3 on Slackware-13.1. The envelope template was built for a COM10 size envelope in 2003 using whatever version of OO.o was then current. Worked fine then; hasn't since OO.o was supplanted by LO. Time to fix this problem. The page size is set for a COM10 US business envelope. When I try printing it (paper size is commercial 10 and paper orientation is landscape mode), the HP LaserJet 5 sits with nothing to print. When I check the CUPS jobs tab I see this error message: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstoraster failed. If I print to a disk file I can print the resulting .pdf to a letter size page, but not to an envelope. Any thoughts on this? Rich -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines +
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: calendar project - should i use writer or calc
I suggest that if you take the mini monthly date calendar and make them images, then it might be worth while to make a Writer template for Writer's text options over Calc. I have printed out many calendars, both Calc based and Writer based, but if you are going to be making one for yourself, you will have to decide which one is easier for you. Having cell, row, column, formatting options are easier to work with in Calc. If you are going to fill out the calendar with a lot of text formatting options that are not in Calc, then you will need to use Writer. If you are going to fill in info in the template for a e-calendar or daily schedule, and then print it out, that might change your decision. I have seem a lot of calendar templates out there, daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly. The big choice is how much space you need to fill in for scheduled events. For a daily and weekly one, there are templates out there that are similar to the Day Planner style that you can buy at the office supply stores. I mostly use a monthly calendar that I place on my refrigerator, a schedule text-window on my desktop, and a cheap weekly schedule book I bought at an office supply store that I carry around with me. On 01/24/2013 12:22 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Generally i would agree with Dan, having seen the photos. However i would normally try a Calendar program such as Google-calendar. They wouldn't produce it exactly the same though. Regards from Tom :) From: Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Cc: martin.kas...@campus-24.com Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2013, 17:15 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: calendar project - should i use writer or calc Having viewed your links, I think the Writer would be a better choice. --Dan On 01/24/2013 12:11 PM, anne-ology wrote: I think you meant to send this to the list, so am forwarding this on to them. As for me, I haven't a clue as to how to use the calc program ;-) From: Martin Kaspar martin.kas...@campus-24.com Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM Subject: calendar project - should i use writer or calc To: lagin...@gmail.com hello dear anne, hope you are fine. currently i am working on the layout of a calendar for the new year 2013 - i want to create a diary to print it out. well i found a template that was designed in calc *question: *should / could i design a layout for the whole year with the calc programme or sould i use writer for it ...? http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/7days_in_line.jpg http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/7_days_in_line_writer.jpg note: i want to add some texts 365 x textblocks should be added - Losungen - ( from the Site; http://www.losungen.de ) see the data: a: http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/losungen_template.jpg well how to proceed should i use calc or writer to do the job love to hear from you greetings matze -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Now using LibreOffice: Need help with files created in OpenOffice...
On 01/23/2013 06:26 PM, John Bentham wrote: Hello, I recently upgraded my OS from Kubuntu 8.04 with OpenOffice 2.4 to Kubuntu 12.04 with LibreOffice. Unfortunately, when I open a file in LibreOffice that was created in OpenOffice, the text on one page now flows over to a second page. My laptop has LibreOffice, and I compared all line spacing, margin settings. etc. to the same document on another desktop that still has OpenOffice 2.4 installed.All settings look identical. In fact, I am comparing the same document using a flash drive to go between systems. Has anyone had a similar problem?How do I resolve this without reformatting the entire document? I'll be happy to send screen shots, if that will help. I had this problem with the OOo 3.0 with LO 3.3. The problem then was the default fonts. LO installs some fonts and uses them for the defaults. Are the fonts you are using in the .fonts hidden folder? I have heard than some systems had OOo and LO fonts installed in other folders than the .fonts folder, including the .libreoffice/3/user/fonts folder. I keep that folder empty and only use the font files in the.fonts folder. OOo may have a similar package defined folder where it places some of the fonts, like LO does. There seems to be some differences in some fonts that seem to have the same name. I use Ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 with the MATE desktop environment instead of the KDE desktop environment, but I have that option installed if I want to open Ubuntu using the KDE d.e.. KDE's System Settings - Font Management utility will group your fonts into System and Personal fonts. My used document fonts tend to alway be listed on the Personal font list and not the System font list. There are a lot of fonts in the System font list I never used and many were installed by Ubuntu 12.04 that were not installed with 10.04. Then things change again with 12.10. ALSO, even if the font that is displayed on the font drop down menu for the document, does not mean you actually have that font installed in the laptop. If you create a document with Al Heavenly for the text, then place it on a flash drive and open it with a different laptop, the font name of Al Heavenly willshow in the document even though the second laptop does not have that font installed. It shows the font that is tagged with the text and does not have than font grayed-out or other indicator that you do not have it installed. So have you checked your font folder[s] to make sure the font is installed in bothsystems? I tend toinstall a set of fonts on all my systems so I do not have this problem. When you have over 100,000 [14 GB] of font files on your system, with a few hundred installed at any one time, it can be a problem to make sure you have the needed fonts installed for a document, if you keep changing which fonts are installed on your system. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...
That unplugging does not work when you deal with a laptop though. The sudo command only works with a Linux install, or live media. That is why I liked the rescue disk. You did not need to deal with commands. All you had to do was boot it up and press a button or three. The rest was automatic. as for the thread title. . . . MS was really expecting big income from their Win8 OS and their Win8 tablet. There seems not to be much less upgrade sales that they predicted. There tablet failed to catch any real market share. MSO-2013 is coming out soon, but the info I have read stated that it was optimized to work with Win8 and its touch abilities. How it will work with XP, Vista, Win7, or even Win8 with non-touch displays will be the key. Also their XML .docx file format [and the others] is not compatible to the 2007 or 2010 XML abilities so a .docx file created with 2013 has a very good chance not to be readable within 2007 or 2010. They do this deliberately to force users to upgrade to their new office product[s]. This was never a good idea in a good economy, but even worse in todays economic conditions where businesses cannot afford the new pricing scheme that MSO uses now. I have read reports showing that MS profits are less and less each quarter [on average]. I have not read how much their failed tablet has cost them though. Still, their profits are greater than most business out there. The desktop/laptop market is slowing as the tablet market is taking more of its market share, but the tablet sales are slowing as well. It is the economic conditions, and users for personal and business systems do not have the capital to buy as much tech as they once did. As long as there is a product like LibreOffice that is developing better and better filters to read/write MSO formats, I will not be buying any MSO products for the foreseeable future. If MS creates a more sensible Windows 9 OS, I may think about upgrading my Win7 laptop to it one day, but not Win8. As long as I can use Ubuntu, or other Linux OS, for my needs, I will prefer to use it. I will have one Windows OS to deal with the required Windows hardware and software - like defragging external drives. My TV and blu-ray devices do not support non-Windows disk formats so I will still need those large externals to be NTFS and defragged by Windows from time to time. Then there are the Windows-only software packages/utilities that deal with special features of my multi-function printers, like their printing of a printable CD/DVD media's label; or a Windows-only USB video capture device. On 01/21/2013 08:37 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Yes, installing a new Windows alongside an existing one still does over-write the Mbr and hides all previous versions of Windows as well as any other OSes you have. It doesn't matter if the newer version is on a different physical drive or on an external drive or anything else. One trick is to physically unplug the drive with the Mbr you want to save and then install the newer Windows on it's own drive. it will overwrite the Mbr on it's drive but will leave the unplugged drive's Mbr alone. Then when you plug in the old drive then hopefully you can set the bios to boot the old drive first. Of course this means the old drive is unaware of the new install so you'll need to run something like sudo update-grub from you old GnuLinux distro. Regards form Tom :) *From:* webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com *To:* LibreO - Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org *Sent:* Tuesday, 22 January 2013, 0:39 *Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ... Maybe you should give the URL for the Linux-based boot repair disk [.iso file download]. I do not remember it it. I have two different disk type/names. boot-repair-disk.iso - 355 MB ubuntu-secure-remix-12.10-32-bit.iso - 787 MB ubuntu-secure-remix-12.10-64-bit.iso - 797.1 MB I think I used the boot-repair-disk version since all you had to do was choose your OS version/type you are using. I think I remember correctly that there was only 4 buttons to choose from once the disk/OS booted up. My Dell laptop had 32-bit Vista even though 64-bit Vista was out and working. Too cheap maybe to include it, since it cost us more for the 64-bit version back then. I just upgraded that dual boot laptop 64-bit Win7 professional from 32-bit Vista and 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10 from 12.04 version. Win7/pro killed the dual booting till I ran the repair disk. I tend to use the Ubuntu boot for the testing of the newest version of Ubuntu [10.04 to 10.10 to 11.04 to 11.10 to 12.04 to 12.10] before I upgrade it on my production desktop. I upgraded the Vista to Win7/pro [64-bit] so I can have a working 64-bit Windows OS on one of my systems
Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...
The problem most people I know has with ME was drivers. The big 2 reasons why I went from Vistas to Win7 were: 1) external drive issues, 2) support for newer hardware [driver] and software. It also helped going from 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7. I still have an XP laptop, but there are more and more hardware and software that wants at least Vista to run, or does not run well on XP. The only reason to upgrade to Win8, to me, is the advanced touch options, as long as you have a touch display though. My only touch display is on my Android tablet and that will be the case for the foreseeable future. On 01/22/2013 11:19 AM, Steven Shelton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/21/2013 4:55 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Typically Windows seem to have 1 bad version followed by 1 good one and then the next is bad. Vista was apparently so bad that many people said they upgraded from Vista back to Xp. Even though that was a backwards step many considered it an upgrade. Win7 was quite good. Before Xp was Millenium which was generally considered so appalling that people are more likely to have heard of Win98. So, people might be expecting Win8 to be another dead OS. As an aside--and apropos to nothing--I actually liked Windows ME. It fixed some networking problems I'd had with Win 98, and I never understood why people always dogged on it so much. It worked great for me. Vista, on the other hand, needed to be scraped from my boot from the moment I had a computer running it. I was more than happy to upgrade to Win 7 (although, to be honest, I still think XP was the best version of Windows ever produced and I still run it on my computers when I have the option). I've only had the smallest amount of time on Windows 8, but it seems apallingly bad and I have no plans to EVER put it on any of my systems. - -- Steven Shelton -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD+u/sACgkQXUonIzCvpdOS5gCePjvdLBMFteYPZqeJJur6X1zR P7IAn0DUuSYcXAAZNbz6eYBCfZjZSNDA =1zKn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...
The trick is to find the old style PATA laptop drives, or at least one that is larger than what is currently in my system. As for doing swapping of parts, my oldest laptop I currently have requires you to remove the keyboard to access things like the memory module. I bought two 1GB mods. and I had to give up replacing one since it was under the keyboard and the instructions given my the manual to access parts below the keyboard was totally wrong and does not work at all. So I must keep the 256MB in that one and forget about getting two mods. installed. The drive was in too tight to remove safely. At least the Optical drive was only two screws, since I have had to replace it twice during the warranty time. I know one Win7 laptop my friend has that used two drives to give him more space than other systems have. I would love to replace my oldest laptop's drive larger than the current 80GB and my dual booting one needs a larger one than the 160GB drive. Having Win7 and Ubuntu 12.10.MATE on one small drive, does not leave much room for larger data files. I rather not buy an external mobile drive that was made to be used with laptops. I rather not have to make sure that an external one is hauled around in a bag with the laptop, packing and unpacking, etc.. It would be much safer to have the data internally to the system. On 01/22/2013 03:16 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote: Webmaster, Not always true. My HP laptop, admittedly old, has a hard drive that can be removed fairly easily with a screwdriver. The trick is to have a spare drive and mounting frame to install. Girvin Herr webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: That unplugging does not work when you deal with a laptop though. snip -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...
On 01/21/2013 10:41 AM, anne-ology wrote: ... maybe not, but this makes me wonder why they were promoting this new OS and now are plugging a how-to re. it ;-) http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/get-free-book-windows-8-microsoft-press.htm?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmosbest+%28Gizmo%27s+Best-ever+Freeware%29 As for me, I'm very thankful there's LO, and with such a great help-list of fellow users :-) The articles I have read seem to tell Win7 users to forget to upgrade to Win8 if you do not have a touch screen. MS's tablet has had low sales figures, much lower than expected or the hype would let you believe. So, giving tech people a free e-book about Win8 is a way for them to promote that OS. I have heard from a few business users where they took their Win8 upgrade and degrade it back to XP or Win7. So maybe MS needs to convince the business users to buy the Win8 upgrade or even new Win8 systems, instead of upgrading to, and/or buying, systems with, Win7. I just upgraded 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7/pro instead of the cheaper priced Win8 deal. I have it on a laptop that is a dual boot for 64-bit Win7/pro and 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10 [with MATE desktop environment]. That upgrade killed the dual booting so I need to use the repair disk. The way I have read seems to be that Win8 would do something with that laptop where it would not be able to dual even after the boot fixing disk. I use the laptop for my main Windows laptop and the Ubuntu boot is where I test out the new version[s] of the OS before I install it onto my main production desktop. I hate the Unity desktop for Ubuntu, so why would I buy Win8 with the same type of desktop tile look and feel. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...
bad version followed by 1 good one and then the next is bad. Vista was apparently so bad that many people said they upgraded from Vista back to Xp. Even though that was a backwards step many considered it an upgrade. Win7 was quite good. Before Xp was Millenium which was generally considered so appalling that people are more likely to have heard of Win98. So, people might be expecting Win8 to be another dead OS. However there is also often quite strong resistance to new things. Especially to new versions of Windows. people have just about become familiar with the older one and don't like the newer ways of doing things and the fact that it's difficult to find things or work out how to deal with issues that they had just learned how to solve on the previous. With GnuLinux it doesn't matter what changes happen to the DE you can always modify it or even just install the old one on your new OS. Regards from Tom :) *From:* webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com *To:* users@global.libreoffice.org *Sent:* Monday, 21 January 2013, 16:34 *Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ... On 01/21/2013 10:41 AM, anne-ology wrote: ... maybe not, but this makes me wonder why they were promoting this new OS and now are plugging a how-to re. it ;-) http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/get-free-book-windows-8-microsoft-press.htm?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmosbest+%28Gizmo%27s+Best-ever+Freeware%29 As for me, I'm very thankful there's LO, and with such a great help-list of fellow users :-) The articles I have read seem to tell Win7 users to forget to upgrade to Win8 if you do not have a touch screen. MS's tablet has had low sales figures, much lower than expected or the hype would let you believe. So, giving tech people a free e-book about Win8 is a way for them to promote that OS. I have heard from a few business users where they took their Win8 upgrade and degrade it back to XP or Win7. So maybe MS needs to convince the business users to buy the Win8 upgrade or even new Win8 systems, instead of upgrading to, and/or buying, systems with, Win7. I just upgraded 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7/pro instead of the cheaper priced Win8 deal. I have it on a laptop that is a dual boot for 64-bit Win7/pro and 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10 [with MATE desktop environment]. That upgrade killed the dual booting so I need to use the repair disk. The way I have read seems to be that Win8 would do something with that laptop where it would not be able to dual even after the boot fixing disk. I use the laptop for my main Windows laptop and the Ubuntu boot is where I test out the new version[s] of the OS before I install it onto my main production desktop. I hate the Unity desktop for Ubuntu, so why would I buy Win8 with the same type of desktop tile look and feel. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: missing dialog option in Win7 install?
On 01/19/2013 06:46 PM, NoOp wrote: On 01/19/2013 06:43 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I just noticed a difference in the Tools Options LibreOffice General options in the 3.6.4 versions. With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs. With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs section is missing. I do not know if it is missing in my Windows installs for earlier versions of LO, since I updated all my Windows systems to 3.6.4 last month. I know, for Ubuntu, I need to click that check box in order to get LO to print duplex pages properly for my Epson Artisan 810 printer. With that option, both my HP Laserjet 2300dn and Canon MG6220 [inkjet] printers are duplexing properly as well. I am running Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit OS with MATE desktop environment and Win7/pro 64-bit systems[plus Ubuntu 10.04 and Win XP/pro] So my Linux system show it, but my Windows systems do not. It there a reason that DEB installs need that option and Windows do not? Probably for the same reason that you don't have spadmin in Windows versions... (CUPS etc). ... Well there should be no difference with the print dialogs between versions. Are you going to use the systems default print dialogs or the package's? Checking the box does not change the print dialogs used for LO. It is always LO's dialogs instead of the one that the other packages use. So either way, it uses a different print dialog than the Ubuntu/Debian default print dialog used by packages like Firefox or GIMP. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: missing dialog option in Win7 install?
On 01/20/2013 12:13 PM, Luuk wrote: On 19-01-2013 15:43, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I just noticed a difference in the Tools Options LibreOffice General options in the 3.6.4 versions. With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs. With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs section is missing. i just upgraded my Windows7 to Libreoffice 3.6.4.3 (from 3.6.1) This setting did exist in 3.6.1 And it no longer there in 3.6.4.3 Enabling 'experimatal features' does not resolve this.. That is the thing, why is it needed for Ubuntu/Debian installs when it was removed for Windows? I run Ubuntu 64-bit 12.04 for my main desktop with Ubuntu 64-bit 12.10 / 64-bit Win7/pro on my dual boot main laptop. I also use 32-bit Ubuntu and WinXP/pro on other desktops and laptops. Right now all of my systems have 3.6.4 installed. Next week 3.6.5 is due to come out. I may test 4.0.0 on my dual booting laptop when it comes out. I tend to use the Ubuntu boot to test out the newest versions of Ubuntu before it goes onto my desktop [where I am typing from, that has 5-TB of storage - maybe more coming in a few months] I wonder if it will be in the 4.0.0 version. I needed to check that print dialog option to get my Epson printer to print duplex pages properly. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] missing dialog option in Win7 install?
On 01/19/2013 01:40 PM, Joel Madero wrote: On 01/19/2013 06:43 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I just noticed a difference in the Tools Options LibreOffice General options in the 3.6.4 versions. With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs. With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs section is missing. I do not know if it is missing in my Windows installs for earlier versions of LO, since I updated all my Windows systems to 3.6.4 last month. I know, for Ubuntu, I need to click that check box in order to get LO to print duplex pages properly for my Epson Artisan 810 printer. With that option, both my HP Laserjet 2300dn and Canon MG6220 [inkjet] printers are duplexing properly as well. I am running Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit OS with MATE desktop environment and Win7/pro 64-bit systems[plus Ubuntu 10.04 and Win XP/pro] So my Linux system show it, but my Windows systems do not. It there a reason that DEB installs need that option and Windows do not? As I said, I just noticed that check box option missing on my Windows install. Try enabling experimental features, I vaguely remember this conversation before. Best Regards, Joel Experimental features? Why would it be an experimental feature in one OS version and not in the other? I do not have either Windows or Ubuntu versions' experimental features box checked. I do not want any experimental feature turned on either. All I know it that Ubuntu's 64-bit install has it while Windows [64-bit Win7] does not have that option. Yes, there has been threads about duplexing issues before. All I had to do was to check that Use LibreOffice dialogs for Print dialogs, and it solved the problem that was not solved since I first bought my Epson Artisan printer, over 1.5 years ago. No one, as far as I remember, talked about this option. But if it is only in the Linux, or Debian, installs and the people who were all using Windows, then they would not have known about the solution. Now, with a new duplexing Canon inkjet printer, I did not even try printing without it on the new one. By-the-way, The Epson Artisan printer is now half dead with its ink pads near end of life. Would cost more to replace them than replacing the actual printer. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird Address Book as Data Source
On 01/18/2013 11:59 AM, Alex Thurgood wrote: On 01/15/2013 03:15 AM, David Burleigh wrote: Hi David, It is very nice that the new 4.0 release includes support for the Thunderbird address book as a data source for mail merges, but it seems to only recognize the Personal Address Book and not any other address books defined in Thunderbird. Is there any way to get it to recognize additional address books defined within Thunderbird? As far as I know, this is a current limitation of the addressbook, but it is either being worked on at the moment, or will be at a later date. The devs are also trying to get group lists read properly, I think, because these don't currently import properly (apparently, but I haven't tried). Alex Why do you want both Personaladdress book and Collected ones? I would say that Thunderbird wanted them to be different so you, the user, can choose which address you collected by returning theemail that would go in your personally used address book. MOST of the collected addresses in its list are one-time-only emails. If they are not, then it is up to me to move them over. I see no reason why someone would want an outside package to access the collected emails address for people you may never deal with again and combine it with your personal emails you chose to keep separate from the collected ones. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-documentation] I joined recently. How can I help?
I did not remember seeing the 3rd chapter for the Base section, the last time I looked at the list. That was less than two weeks ago. On 01/14/2013 03:46 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On 01/14/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) The docs team is currently working on 2 sets of documentation for Base. A full guide and a short(ish) handbook (this latter is being translated from the German one). Dan has just completed 2 chapters for the full guide but the team would appreciate anyone that can spare a bit of time to review the 2 chapters https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications#LibreOffice_Base_Guide Regards from Tom :) Pardon me, if I am being a little picky: the link you gave has 3 chapters listed (chapter 1 is published, and chapters 2 and 3 are only drafts). I must have slipped the third chapter in without anyone noticing it. --Dan From: Dan Lewis Completing the Base Handbook might be a good idea also. Completing it would be nice. Chapter 5 discusses queries. This is the link where this can be gotten. http://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/base-handbook/drafts My personal thinking is that chapters 2 and 3 might be easier to review for someone who has limited experience with Base because they deal with the basics. The later chapters of the Base Handbook discuss the more complex parts of Base. A working knowledge of Base is helpful for them. I'm thinking that the earlier chapters have already received reviews and at least some proofreading. Below is the link where my chapters can be gotten. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications So, here are a couple of choices that need someone to do some work on. --Dan -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Base: Changing restoring (Default) font
On 01/11/2013 09:28 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote: Greetings, I am running Base in LO 3.6.4.3. In a form, I am trying to change the (Default) font without any progress. I do not know where this (Default) font setting is located and the styles icon on the toolbar, along with the font window on the toolbar are grayed out if I have a control selected. They are not grayed out if I do not have any control selected and then I can change the Default style font to another font. However, when I select a control, the control properties dialog still has (Default) selected and the font displayed in the control is not the font I changed to in the style dialog. Does anyone know where to set the font assigned to the (Default) font? Second, related question: Once the control's font is changed in the control properties dialog to something other than (Default), how does one get it back to (Default)? The (Default) option is not available in the font selection dialog. Thanks in advance. Girvin Herr Tools Options LibreOffice Writer Basic Fonts (Western) It shows: Default Heading List Cation Index You can change the font name and size. Just make sure you press the Default buttonif you want to change the default font so it will be the new one next time you open LibreOffice. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Would it be OK to have an Urban dictionary words. . .
I was looking at some articles and one mentioned the Urban Dictionary. This seems to be a list of English Language Slang words and phrases. Would that be something that would be useful as a add on dictionary to LibreOffice? It would not take too much of an effort to make the dictionary, just some days of time to get the word into a list. So, would it be something that English users of LO use or would it be just a novelty? For abit of time, that dictionary was on the IBM Watson supercomputer, but it kept using too much street language in improper moments. Since LO is for kids to adults, students to business people, well there are a lot of different types and style of speech out there. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Would it be OK to have an Urban dictionary words. . .
On 01/12/2013 11:35 AM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 01/12/2013 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I was looking at some articles and one mentioned the Urban Dictionary. This seems to be a list of English Language Slang words and phrases. Would that be something that would be useful as a add on dictionary to LibreOffice? It would not take too much of an effort to make the dictionary, just some days of time to get the word into a list. So, would it be something that English users of LO use or would it be just a novelty? For abit of time, that dictionary was on the IBM Watson supercomputer, but it kept using too much street language in improper moments. Since LO is for kids to adults, students to business people, well there are a lot of different types and style of speech out there. Interesting idea. I personally do not need an Urban Dictionary but the concept of a specialist (technical/medical/scientific) dictionary is appealing. In either case I would include it as an optional extension for the user to install. It will be an .oxt extension/dictionary. It will be listed as an add on option in the extension center so it is very optional. As for specialist dictionaries, well I been wanting to create science, mathematics, and other specialized word lists that will end up in their very own dictionaries. It would be great to have dictionaries that have the correctly spelled words used in the various science and technicalcourses that are taught in the universities and are part of the field of work for these scienceand technical people. Would be good to have them for our Educational users. All I need is the source documents that are professionally done or published, that do not cost me any money to buy or join like professional journals do. But the difficulty to is finding the correctly spelled words online or in a downloadable document. I have created a Python script that takes HTML files and converts them into a word list [set of lists]. I use the same scriptto take any text file and make it into a set of lists of words. With online sources, I can cut/paste the text into LO and then make the word lists. It can be easy or hard, depending on how much trouble it is to deal with the original online text. Any professionally created document for their field of study should have a 99.% of the words correctly spelled. One error in a 100,000words or so is a good statistic. I have found misspelled words in printed text books and other documents like that. Noone is perfectthough. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] portable, mobile printers and a more
On 01/10/2013 12:45 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 01/10/2013 11:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Does anyone use or know of good portable/mobile printers to carry with you when you have to work-on-the-move? I have already asked at LinuxQuestions but many of my company's outreach workers use Windows. Anyway, here's the LQ thread ... http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/mobile-printers-4175444990/ We are hoping to prepare a funding application detailing how much it would cost to provide 1 outreach workers with a tablet and a printer and then we can show how much we need for all of them or how many we could make do with. Obviously it takes a long time for funders to respond and even if successful the money takes even longer to arrive so i'm not looking for cheapest one-off deals. I'm looking for reasonably reliable models and manufacturers and then i can look-up how much they cost. I've had a lot of questions about printers generally this year and they always seem to be a pita to look after. So, on LQ i am hoping to start a poll to find which manufacturer people prefer. Unfortunately i can only think of a very few; Hewlett Packard, Cannon, Brother, Oki and Ricoh. I feel like i am missing some very obvious ones. If you can think of any please can you let me know in this thread or at LQ http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/how-to-set-up-a-poll-here-at-lq-to-see-which-printer-company-people-prefer-4175445008/ Any suggestions? Regards from Tom :) I guess the obvious question is what type ( and size - no. of pages) of documents will users print? This will influence what options are reasonable. Another issue is are they stationary when they are working such as at a client's office all day(s) or they constantly moving during the day - my concern is weight and size. For the former you might get by with a small, cheap inkjet printer readily available at Walmart in the US. For the latter, I do not have any good ideas particularly if it must be battery powered. Option two is to create and email a pdf document. I went to Amazon.com and entered mobile printer. There were a lot of hits, with many not mobile printers. There were some at about $200, but the good ones were around $500 +/-. Some of them included batteries or you could get battery packs for them. I read one that had a car 12 volt lighter plugin option. Yes, the key is what you want to use it for. The second it the price you can pay. For me the third is the price for the ink. I always check the ink costs for OEM and non-OEM cartridges, and printer drivers for Linux [DEBs]. I could get a good price on the printer but the ink could be very high, or you cannot get the needed OS drivers. I just ordered a Canon printer to replace my Epson [ink pads are at end of life and cost too much to get the replaced]. The USA and Canadian sites did not have Linux drivers, but the UK, AU, and Asian [English pages] sites did. The OEM ink for a full 2 sets would be around $150 to $180, while an non-OEM ink vendor would charge about $30 +/- for the same number of ink cartridges. So if you are looking for a mobile printer, or any one, you should do a lot of looking at models for specifications you want/need, ink pricing, and needed drivers and other software it has. For me, the prices of the truly mobile printers are way beyond what I can play. For a professional sales or marketing individual, they may need to pay the price so they can print off the needed paperwork to be signed by their new clients. For printer names - Kodak and Epson are not listed. They may have mobile printer lines that might work. How mobile is needed? Batteries or wall plug. Work in car, in a spare office, or client's office? How many pages [auto duplex needed?] needed to be printed out. The weight of the printer and its physical size. Laptop or tablet/smartphone printing capabilities [yes you can print from iPads and some tablets now] -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] crash recovery odd behavior
I have not had the problem with 3.6.4, but when I did, Cancel sometimes worked and sometimes did not. On 01/10/2013 07:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) Have you tried the Cancel button when you get that recovery dialogue pop-up box? Cancel usually clears them. I often find that documents it worries might have been corrupted are actually completely fine. Regards from Tom :) From: Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.com To: cpaul...@alumni.middlebury.edu Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013, 21:55 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] crash recovery odd behavior On 10/01/2013, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote: LO crashed ( I think I ran out of battery on my laptop) with 3 documents open. When re-opening some time later, 3 documents failed recovery. I had probably trashed the files b/c I didn't need them any more, but not sure. In any case, these 3 files keep coming up as having been improperly closed every time I open LO. They of course fail each time. I've looked for a setting to clear out the list of files that crashed, but can't find it. Is this by design? If so, can I somehow clear out the file list so it opens normally? Thanks, Carl -- Carl Paulsen -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Collate print option not working - Solved for Epson Printers
Background: There has been a number of threads about duplex problems printing from LO. On an Ubuntu 64-bit 10.04 and 12.04 OS, an Epson Artisan 810 printer would not duplex, while the HP 2300dn laser would, when printing from LO Writer. The Artisan will print duplex using the default PDF reader or all of the other packages installed in the Ubuntu computer. Solution: Here is the solution that was made for the Artisan printer. First I installed 3 different drivers for the printer to see if any of these would solve the problem: 1] epson-inkjet-printer 1.0.0-1lsb3.2 (Seiko Epson Corporation LSB 3.2) 2] epson-inkjet-printer-escpr 1.2.2-1lsb3.2 (Seiko Epson Corporation LSB 3.2 3] CUPS+Gutenprint (OpenPrinting LSB 3.2) v5.2.7 None of them would print duplex by default using LO. I went to the Options - LibreOffice - Print section and there was nothing there to help. Then I started to go through all of the options. There was one option I did not try Options - LibreOffice - General Print dialogs Use LibreOffice dialogs This checkbox is not checked by default. I decided to try it. Well, it worked. Why using the default setting does not work, I do not know. Why LO does not use the default Print dialogs [for Ubuntu and Windows XP/Vista] like all the other packages do, I do not know. You would think that if one printer works with the duplexing, the other would as well. If LO used the default/standard printing dialogs, would it work, maybe. Also for the print driver options: the #2 driver - Escpr driver does not have any duplex option. #1 and #2 do not have any resolution options other than 300 by 300 DPI, while #3 has many, many DPI resolution options. the CUPS+Gutenberg - OpenPrinting - driver seems to have the best color results for all three printer drivers. SO the default in the General dialog does not work for printing duplex for several printers, mine included. Why I did not check this box before? I was told, when LO first came out, to use the defaults and not use the LO dialogs for Load/Save and Printing. Well, it was a simple fix. Whether it would work for the other printers that have duplexing issues, I do not know. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
On 12/21/2012 01:46 PM, RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO wrote: Me too for you and all Regards, Jorge Rodríguez - Mensaje original - De: Eliane Domingos de Sousa elianedomin...@libreoffice.org Para: users@global.libreoffice.org Enviados: Viernes, 21 de Diciembre 2012 7:59:50 Asunto: [libreoffice-users] Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Hi all, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! A git for you TDF, thanks for all you do for us! http://blog.pt-br.libreoffice.org/2012/12/21/feliz-natal-e-prospero-2013/ From Brazilian LibreOffice Community!!! Best That tree would make a good image to be placed on next year'sLibreOffice.org's opening page. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] huge print jobs for MS Publisher Imagesetter printer
On 12/20/2012 09:34 AM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 12/20/2012 08:12 AM, Anna Martynova wrote: Hello. I noticed a strange thing in Windows version of Libre Office. When I print to printer that is configured with driver MS Publisher Imagesetter, sometimes print files are really huge. For testing purpose I used Print to file option. For example I attached a 13 kilobyte odt file that turns into 48 megabytes print file. It contains several lines of letters and numbers, and then broken link to image (copied from web browser). If I print this document to another printer (with different driver, for example, HP LaserJet 2050) the size of print jobs is quite reasonable (less than 1 megabyte). Is it normal behavior? Have anyone else noticed that? We met with it when we were trying to understand why printing from Libre Office takes so much time in RDP terminal session. :) (We had files that produced even 250 Mb of print data, of course it took much time to send it to terminal client's printer). Thanks in advance. Anna What is the default system printer? MS Publisher is part of the MSO office suite and is available in the more expensive versions. I have no idea what the MS Publisher Imagesetter is for unless it is doing something like converting other MSO formats to MS Publisher format much like various Print to PDF converters work. If my guess is correct then I am not surprised that it garbled other file formats. I had a big graphic map of regional railroad lines. I created a high res PDF file to be printed on a plotter at 3 foot by 4 foot. It would not render. I never did get any large format prints from the professional equipment. BUT, I took that same file and printed it out to an inkjet printer and it printed file, thought it took a long time to do the processing the data to be sent via the USB cable to the inkjet. Saying that, it could be the massive amount of data that the Imagesetter needs to do its job, vs. what an HP printer [bw or color] would need. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Windows 8 Compatibility - More Info
Right now libreoffice has 12 out of 13 votes for compatible The Documentation Foundation has 4 out of 4 votes. To be honest, do you really think that MS would list competition in their compatibility reports? Nearly half of my major packages were not reported in their Win7 compatibility report, the last time I ran it. Plus it told me a couple of packages were not compatible when the software companies advertise it works for XP through Win7. Have not tried the Win8, since I will not buy it. I should buy Win7, if possible next month for upgrading my 32-bit Vista [dual boot with Ubuntu] to Win7 64-bit. On 12/17/2012 12:49 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I wanted to check on the Access Violation that Tony experienced to see it was an easily reproducible situation for a Windows 8 installation of LibreOffice. Before doing that, I installed LibreOffice 3.6.4 on a Windows XP SP3 system. I then ran the Windows 8 Upgrade advisor. The upgrade advisor did not include LibreOffice in its report, neither as compatible or incompatible. However, there was a link to web resources for checking on applications not covered in Upgrade Advisor reports. After nosing around, I was led to here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/win8/CompatCenter/ProductViewerWithDefaultFilters?TempOsid=win8Locale=en-usTextSearch=LibreOffice There is a Compatibility Center where reports about particular applications are crowd-sourced. (Note that only major versions are identified.) The dual listing for LibreOffice Version 3 is because TDF is identified as the brand in one source, and libreoffice in another. The same Community Discussion backs up both, though. To see how this works, I voted on the TDF entry. I was unable to specify version 3.6 (only 3.3 and 3.5 are listed), nor was I asked for details. Interesting but not totally satisfying. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 13:39 To: 'Jay Lozier'; users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: RE: Windows 8 Compatibility (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: 0xc005 error in RPCRT4.dll from soffice.bin) Jay, I agree. There are two kinds of compatibility for Windows 8. First, desktop compatibility is essentially the same as for Windows 7. There is more room for gradual upgrade to integrate more smoothly, including on x64 machines with Atom processors, solid-state drives, and storage in the cloud. I think UX features will also adjust and improve, but that will be relatively gradual. [ ... ] -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO not starting after install
On 12/13/2012 09:30 AM, David Moeser wrote: Windows 7 professional 64 bit installed LO successfully try to open LO error message |--- LibreOffice 3.6 - Fatal Error --- The program cannot be started. The service manageris not available. (cannot open /URE/services.rdb: 21) Start setup application to repair the installationfrom CD, or the folder containing the installation packages. --- OK --- tried repair, install as administrator no help LO will not start after install | By chance do you have a Java Runtime installed? If not, install one and then try it again. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before release
4.0.0.x should not be rolled out before Feb 4th. BUT, if testers and the developers can fix more within the RC1 and RC2, then there will less for fixing for the 4.0.1 version. As for OSs, there needs to be a lot more, a lot of different OS and system setups than before, if we want to really do a big testing and fix session. Windows XP, Vista, Win7 and Win8 Touch systems for Windows Linux Ubuntu and 2 other, different .deb mainstream OS packages 3 or more different .rpm installed package OSs MacOSX PPC Intel I do not know about Mac, but we need as many different configurations for Windows and Linux as we can. I do remember something about problems with Netbooks in the past due to their weird screen size and aspect ratio. Then there is the new touch needs with the newest Win8 systems. How much smaller it the total install of LO vs. the space needed to install Word '13 and Excel '13 [or 2010, or 2007] ? These new touch laptops/netbooks/convertables may have much less resources than a typical laptop. So install size might be worth looking into for marketing towards these systems. ALSO maybe we can do something to the download system that does not default to 4.0.0.x over the 3.6.5 version. Give the choice upfront and not the relatively smaller text for change of system or version than the big green buttons. Since it is no longer a 3.6.x to 3.7.x change, but a 3.6.x to 4.0.0 change, it needs to be well thought out on how it is presented. It the 4.0.0 going to be stating for early adopters like the graph has stated all this time on the Release Plan page? [the graph still shows 3.7] We do not want new users to be defaulted to 4.0.0.x if there are any issues that would turn them off, that would not be there within the 3.6.5 version. We do not need any bad press with a major version change that this will look like to new users. I may be blowing smoke asking this, but it would be better than defaulting to 4.0.0.x for all users, if the new users could try 3.6.5 before trying a #.0.0 version. Ultra-Stable is now wording we want to avoid, since it could be ultra-stable for most but there can be almost show-stopper issues that do not affect the stability. On 12/13/2012 07:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I am really impressed that people are already taking part. Nicely done Paolo! It should be fun and will be good. Lets try to get the 4.0.0 ultra stable earlier in it's cycle so we can use and roll it out sooner. I hope to test-drive it a bit on 3 different types of machines and on 3 different OSes. I recommend making a back-up copy of your user-profile. Copypaste is a good way to do that. wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/UserProfile I think i'm going to do straight installs wiping out the current versions of LO on those machines. After testing i can reinstall the older version that everyone in the office is on and copy back the old user-profiles. If you can do a parallel install instead then that would probably be a much better way. Good luck and happy hunting all! Regards from Tom :) From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com To: Paolo Debortoli paolo_debort...@yahoo.com Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012, 20:50 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before release On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Paolo Debortoli paolo_debort...@yahoo.com wrote: i think everything is working well at the moment. i have found very marginal problems with LO until now. i just suggested time ago that LO should include an automatic crash report (such as ms office, firefox and other software), which can be enabled or disabled by the user in the software settings (or which asks every time: do you want to send this information?) and which should send in a database some information (eg operating system, software version, type of document, type of operation and so on) every time it notices a crash in the software (for example in my case LO crashed more times trying to open .docx documents). This could make much easier to compile lists of bugs and issues. I'll bring this up during QA call to see if it's been discussed. Thanks for the suggestion :) Regards, Joel From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:30 PM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before release On 12/13/2012 07:09 AM, webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk wrote: I think an office suite should be stable. So, I think to emphasize the importance of quality assurance is vital. May I suggest adding a step checking if the office suite starts properly? LibreOffice should support most hardware and software configurations. If it does not start in one case, please postpone and stop the release. I'm one of the people really involved with QA and
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3,5,5,3: Odd miror-image landscape diff with LO 3.4.5
I wonder if it would change again with the 3.6.4 version. Are you using the Mageia repository version of LO or the LO site download? Manual feed, or tray feed? I know that LO can have some printer setting issues that other software [like default PDF reader] do not. My problem is duplexing. Would the Envelope feeding be a similar issue? Also, why do you need to use left or right side of the feeder? My HP laser printers use a center-feeding option for envelopes. On 12/13/2012 08:42 PM, anne-ology wrote: Odd that the printer settings should change - On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Maurice Batey maur...@bcs.org.uk wrote: I have a 'long-envelope' file that I use fpr printing out envelopes with my address on the left and an addressee box on the right. Using LO 3.4.5 under Mandriva 2010.2 I insert the blank envelope on the RIGHT-hand side of the printer (HP5150) paper feed. Works fine. Using LO 3.5.5.3 under Mageia-2 and the same envelope file, I have to insert the blank envelope on the LEFT-hand side of the same printer's paper feed. Not a problem, but can anyone suggest an explanation for the difference, please? -- /\/\aurice (Retired in Surrey, UK) Registered Linux User #487649 -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system
I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads, installs, and updates, a list of packages for you. I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed. This statement is what worries me though: No Clicking Next, Next, Next Ninite fully automates installers offscreen. See what you think. http://ninite.com/ -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system
On 12/12/2012 09:57 AM, Joel Madero wrote: On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads, installs, and updates, a list of packages for you. I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed. This statement is what worries me though: No Clicking Next, Next, Next Ninite fully automates installers offscreen. See what you think. http://ninite.com/ When I used Windows years ago I used to ninite quite frequently, it's just a small installer that then pulls the individual installers and then goes through them automatically, pretty functional. Regards, Joel What I do not like it the statements that makes me feel that I have no control of how the packages are installed. I always do a custom install of packages to make sure I only install things I want. For LO, I make sure I install only the languages and dictionaries I want. There are some packages that has a default of adding toolbars and other things to other packages, like browsers, that are not acceptable to my point of view. I never heard of this Ninite so I did not know about how much trust I would give it. Also, does Windows LO still need a JRE installed BEFORE it gets installed? Use to be yes. If such a auto install system tries to install LO with no JRE installed first, then problems. . . . -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system
On 12/12/2012 11:02 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: On 12-12-12 10:10 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 12/12/2012 09:57 AM, Joel Madero wrote: On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads, installs, and updates, a list of packages for you. I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed. This statement is what worries me though: No Clicking Next, Next, Next Ninite fully automates installers offscreen. See what you think. http://ninite.com/ When I used Windows years ago I used to ninite quite frequently, it's just a small installer that then pulls the individual installers and then goes through them automatically, pretty functional. Regards, Joel What I do not like it the statements that makes me feel that I have no control of how the packages are installed. I always do a custom install of packages to make sure I only install things I want. For LO, I make sure I install only the languages and dictionaries I want. There are some packages that has a default of adding toolbars and other things to other packages, like browsers, that are not acceptable to my point of view. It's extremely useful to build new Windows systems (ie mass installs). It's not free open source though. I never heard of this Ninite so I did not know about how much trust I would give it. Also, does Windows LO still need a JRE installed BEFORE it gets installed? Use to be yes. If such a auto install system tries to install LO with no JRE installed first, then problems. . . . So don't use it. Use one of the free open source alternatives, testit/file a bug report to help fix/test it: http://alternativeto.net/software/ninite/?license=opensource F. I have a list of software that I prefer to install on Windows systems [even though I prefer Linux]. That list included LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, and a few Image/Graphics software, Then I add the security software that I prefer to use. That service does not include much of what I would add to a new system or suggest to users for their systems. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A Tale of Two Office Suites
On 12/11/2012 05:02 AM, Pedro wrote: NoOp wrote I wonder what office suites you are using. Neither LO or AOO default to turning a (c) into a © - (C) does. But guess what? Microft Word does it for both... (c) and (C). Next... So, based on this small detail you insinuate that the user is lying and ignore all the rest of the message... That is exactly the kind of support that people need on a User mailing list! Please think about this: Don't say/write everything that you think, but think everything that you say/write Are you using this extension? Compose Special Characters - extension - Compose Special Characters lets you type two or three characters and use a keyboard shortcut to convert them into a single accented or special character. You can also compose unicode characters using its 4 character unicode value. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS Office MacIntosh to Libre Writer Windows
On 12/10/2012 01:36 PM, bsn wrote: Hi Miroslaw I needed some delay to check what software my friend had used : it was Pages , and I was using LO 3.5 Thx to your advice, I've installed LO 3.6.4.3 and the problem has disappeared. I now can read the Mac docs. Thanks to you, and thx also to everybody that has spent time to reply Bruno From: Mirosław Zalewski [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:21 PM To: bsn Subject: Re: MS Office MacIntosh to Libre Writer Windows On 27/11/2012 at 18:47, bsn [hidden email] wrote: Recently a guy sent me a doc created on a Mac. It is impossible to open it . LO opens a small window (ASCII filter options) and converts the doc to a unreadable scribble. Perhaps he created it using Apple Pages? Then you have encountered #53909 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53909) This is fixed in LO 3.6.4-rc2, which will be released this week. Or you can wait until next week, when 3.6.4 will be officially released (it will be bit-by-bit identical to rc2, so I suggest downloading rc2 when it is ready). Or, if this is matter of life and death, you can downgrade to 3.5.4 (but not 3.5.5 or later). Why was the bug in the later versions of 3.5.x? I have not kept up with this thread, since I am not a Mac person, but I have 2 friends that are and I keep them up on the availability of the new versions. I have been using 3.5.7 till 3.6.4 came out. So would they if they took my advice. Also, this email seemed to have been delayed since you talk about 3.6.4 coming out next week, when it has been out since the 5th or 6th, and I just got this email. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites
I prefer to keep the folders for package separate, just in case there is a problem with one and I would have the other to use. I just make sure I backup all the major dot folders on my Linux systems every few days and not worry about the others except monthly. do not use both LO and AOO on the same system. On 12/10/2012 08:35 PM, VA wrote: Tom, I absolutely agree. It never occurred to me to use the Paths function to point both programs to the same template folder. It’s a great idea. I was only concerned about corruption as I’ve seen that issue come up so many times on both LO and AOO user lists, although I’ve never had the problem with mine before. Virgil From: Tom Davies Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:09 PM To: VA ; users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites Hi :) It might be easier to keep track of your back-ups if you are only backing up 1 folder rather than 2. Regards from Tom :) -- From: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2012, 0:36 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites Tom, Thanks for the tip. But, don't I run the risk of having one or both programs corrupting my user configuration? Virgil -Original Message- From: Tom Davies Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:40 PM To: RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO ; VA Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites Hi :) Perhaps try this in either Office Suite Tools - Options - Paths and set them both to read the same folders. That way all your settings should be the same regardless of which program you happen to have open at the time. I'm considering using that sort of approach to make the GnuLinux side of dual boots read the same settings as the WIndows side but i have a lot of other things to figure out first. Regards from Tom :) From: RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO jrodrigue...@cpcecr.com To: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Monday, 10 December 2012, 22:53 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites +1 agree - Mensaje original - De: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com Para: users@global.libreoffice.org Enviados: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre 2012 16:28:35 Asunto: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites I may be way out of line here, but I’m sending this post to the user lists for both LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice. I have both programs on my computer and regularly use both. Like many of you out there, I have subscribed to both user lists. I don’t know the full history behind the Libre/Oracle split, but from what I have read on various forums and lists, there is considerable emotional pain resulting from the split. The result is two different FOSS office suites. Some have pleaded for the two to combine forces. Others have noted that the competition is good for the end user as it results in more rapid development of improvements to both suites. I see both sides, but I’d like to point out one thing I have noticed in my own use of the two programs. Some computer programs are what I would call “load and use.” Programs like web browsers and mail clients, etc., require little to no configuration or customization. One can simply do productive use without much thought. I can easily bounce back and forth between Internet Explorer and Firefox, Live Mail and Thunderbird. Not so with office suites. To get the most out of my office suites, I create and edit templates, page, character and paragraph styles. I have to set the autocorrect functions of each program to my liking to prevent a (c) from turning into a ©. While it’s not essential, I tend to customize my toolbars and have created helpful macros. Effectively using an office suite requires a commitment akin to a marriage. For this reason, bouncing back and forth between two suites is counterproductive. I find myself importing and exporting settings, styles, and templates between the two programs rather than simply doing my work. Why do I put up with this inconvenience? Because each program has essential virtues over the other. For example, if I need to properly hyphenate my US English, I use LibreOffice as (to date), OpenOffice fails to properly hyphenate US English. But, if I need to create mailing lists, as I just did for Christmas cards, I use OpenOffice as its Avery 5160 template is more properly aligned than that found in LibreOffice. LibreOffice remembers my hierarchical stylelist setting, whereas OpenOffice does not, but OpenOffice more effectively supports the
Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites
On 12/10/2012 10:25 PM, VA wrote: do not use both LO and AOO on the same system. Why not? Virgil 1 - I do not use AOO [or OOo before AOO came out] since I started using LO almost 2 years ago. 2 - I do not think it is wise to use two packages that are both forks from the original OOo code base, on the same system. Yes there are procedures you can do to have both packages installed on the same system, just like you can have two versions of LO installed on the same system. Just because you can do something does not mean it is something that you should do. 3 - 1 and 2 are reasons enough. Whether or not there are people who do not believe the same way that I do, this is what I believe. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted