Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: 3/4/13 in writer table

2013-03-05 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 03/05/2013 06:32 AM, william drescher wrote:

On 3/4/2013 12:01 PM, upscope wrote:

On Monday, March 04, 2013 10:09:52 AM bill wrote:

I have a writer document with a table. The first col is formatted
as date, but when I enter today ( 3/4/13 ) the 3/4 is formatted
as a small 3/4th.

I checked the col formatting and it really is date (MM/DD/YY)

Any thoughts or suggestions ?

Is it a col. or a table.


it is a column in a table in a writer document.


Are you using  Table--Number Format --Date to select the
format of the date?

yes

bill





If the column is in Calc then you may need to make
the 3/4/13 cell into a text or date cell first.

  Format  Cells  Numbers  Category  Text
or

  Format  Cells  Numbers  Category  Date
 Format - the first option

depending if you want it to be a date or text cell




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Thesaurus is a dictionary of synonyms or real thesaurus

2013-03-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 03/04/2013 04:12 AM, András Csányi wrote:

Dear All,

I would like to ask some help regarding thesaurus in Libreoffice. I'm
a librarian an whenever I hear that there is thesaurus in the
Libreoffice I cannot decide whether this is a dictionary of the
synonyms or a real thesaurus used by librarians.

Here you can read about what the thesaurus is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus

Thanks in advance,

András



Here is the definition of thesaurus according to your link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus - A thesaurus is a reference 
work that lists words grouped together according to similarity of 
meaning (containing synonyms and sometimes antonyms), in contrast to a 
dictionary, which contains definitions and pronunciations. 


The one[s] I have installed, with 4.0.0, shows similar terms.  For 
belly it shows several types of nouns and verb replacements for that 
word/term. I also know that there are adjectives and adverbs listed for 
some words. These may be listed by other thesaurus systems as synonym, 
derivatives, kind of, kinds, and parts.  I have even seen the term of 
domain listed under the term relatives.


So, we have the synonyms and other relatives.  As for antonyms, well I 
have not looked at a lot of words in the thesaurus system/file[s] I use, 
but we are dependent on others to create these for us.  Actually, my 
book thesaurus is a Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus and I do not see 
antonyms listed for the words I looked at.


As far as I know, most of the dictionary and thesaurus options are based 
on the WordNet and Hunspell format and offerings.  We rely on these 
free  offerings, and others, to be able to have language aids included 
in LibreOffice.


SO, please tell us what is used by a librarian/library as a reference 
thesaurus.  I would like to know. What do you mean by real thesaurus 
used by librarians.


Also, I use an offline dictionary[definitions] and thesaurus called 
Artha that I use on my Ubuntu/Linux and Windows systems.  This is 
free, like LibreOffice.  I looked up many words using it, over the past 
few years, and I do not remember if it showed and antonyms.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] has anyone seen page scaling option in LO printing?

2013-03-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I was wondering. . .
Has anyone seen the page scaling option when printing within LO?

This is a needed option that is shown within the printing options for 
non-LO packages. The scaling options are:  None, Shrink to Printing 
Area, and Fit to Printing Area.  It is a part of the Page Handling tab 
when I print the PDF version of the document from the Ubuntu default 
viewer I need this option to be set to None when I print brochures 
and other documents that are formatted to the page with folded panels.


So has anyone seen this option printing within LO for your printing?

I normally set it to shrink to printing area to deal with the 
header/footer lines when printing a web page to a PDF file using 
CUPS-PDF printing optionwith Firefox.  So it is a pain to set it to 
none for a brochure testprint via the System/Administration/Printing 
option/menu, and then set it back again for my normal printing.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Thesaurus is a dictionary of synonyms or real thesaurus

2013-03-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 03/04/2013 11:23 AM, doug wrote:

On 03/04/2013 04:12 AM, András Csányi wrote:

Dear All,

I would like to ask some help regarding thesaurus in Libreoffice. I'm
a librarian an whenever I hear that there is thesaurus in the
Libreoffice I cannot decide whether this is a dictionary of the
synonyms or a real thesaurus used by librarians.

Here you can read about what the thesaurus is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesaurus

Thanks in advance,

András


If you want a real thesaurus, install Artha. It's a very good dictionary
(for meanings, not pronunciation) and a real thesaurus.  Its only
fault, as I see it, is that it considers all words very rare--and it's
rarely right on that score!

--doug



I do not see many antonyms listed.

I just wonder what is meant by a real thesaurus used by librarians.
To be honest, my printed book thesaurus does not show much more
than LO's thesaurus or Athra's thesaurus information .



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Impress remote under windows

2013-03-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Sometimes it is needed to know if things are needing the experimental 
features option checked to get it to work.


I was told to do that to get the solution to an issue, once, but the 
solution was not part of those features.


So, it is nice you found the issue, but it would be nice to know what is 
needing that option to work.



On 03/03/2013 07:12 PM, Boyi Chen wrote:

Solved. Just enable experimental feature in Options.
Sorry about my carelessness.


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Boyi Chen fts...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi,

I'm using LibreOffice RC 4.0.1.2 for windows and Impress Remote 1.0.4, but
when I tried using impress remote on Android, it can't connect to my
laptop. The problem is impress not listen on TCP 1599, but still listen on
UDP 1598. Anyone has a suggestion to resolve it?





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinctsetoffonts?

2013-02-27 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


That is why I have Web Of Trust install on all of my browsers. It is 
free and works very well.  It will rate the sites, when googling, to 
help you keep out of the nasty sights.  I only go to sites listed as 
green.


http://www.fontspace.com/

http://www.dafont.com/

http://www.1001freefonts.com/

These are the first three green ones I have gone to in the past.

Of course, it is always nice to scan any file you download, just to be 
on the safe side.



On 02/26/2013 10:14 PM, anne-ology wrote:

Thanks.

In order to avoid these nasty viruses, I tend to avoid many of these
'finds' through the search engines  ;-)



On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.comwrote:

One of my favorite free fonts is OFL Sorts Mill Goudy from http://www.**

theleagueofmoveabletype.com/ http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/.
It comes in both TrueType and OpenType formats. I've found I prefer the
TrueType as it displays better on my screen. Both print very nicely.

There are other free fonts at the website that you might enjoy.

One thing I learned the hard way is that free font files sometimes come
complete with viruses, so I would be fairly careful about obtaining free
fonts online.

Virgil




From: anne-ology
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Webmaster
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org

Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own
distinctsetoffonts?

   I guess it'd be asking too much for you to share your script-fonts
with me  ;-)

   I've been missing them so ... ... ...
   you could DropBox them - http://db.tt/QBTMH08Z



On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:


  I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them]

Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files.  Every so often I
do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e.
handwriting, holiday, etc.].  The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are
sorted by name.

There are many, many, free font sites out there.  Some better than others.
  Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like letters made
out
of bones, or rope, or look like wood.  That sort of thing, when I need
something I do not have.  I have a large collection of handwriting ones.
  Alway want to find better ones for different types of documents.  I
currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, calligraphy, and brush
type.



On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote:

  and how does one acquire these nice fonts?

I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be
replaced
by these odd-character ones,
   which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language  ;-)



On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:


  I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not. I


have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010.

The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every
time
I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to
the
/fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any
choice.  One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was
not
something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to
say I
do not want them.

Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of
their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept,
but
it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550
fonts to my Windows font folder.  That was a vector graphic package back
in
the Win XP days.

What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the
fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the
packages can access them.  I did that with the LO fonts including the
DejaVu ones.



On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:

  I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm


just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous.

When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying
something along the lines of Installing  font or words to that
effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts
does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows
is
notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task.

My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts
folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem
regardless of my method of installation.

However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to
specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a
couple of
really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder
of
the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on
purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not
other programs.

Virgil

Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?

2013-02-26 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them]

Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files.  Every so often 
I do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e. 
handwriting, holiday, etc.].  The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are 
sorted by name.


There are many, many, free font sites out there.  Some better than 
others.  Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like 
letters made out of bones, or rope, or look like wood.  That sort of 
thing, when I need something I do not have.  I have a large collection 
of handwriting ones.  Alway want to find better ones for different types 
of documents.  I currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, 
calligraphy, and brush type.



On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote:

and how does one acquire these nice fonts?
   I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be replaced
by these odd-character ones,
  which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language  ;-)



On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:



I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not.  I
have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010.

The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time
I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to the
/fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any
choice.  One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not
something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to say I
do not want them.

Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of
their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, but
it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550
fonts to my Windows font folder.  That was a vector graphic package back in
the Win XP days.

What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the
fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the
packages can access them.  I did that with the LO fonts including the
DejaVu ones.



On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:


I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm
just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous.

When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying
something along the lines of Installing  font or words to that
effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts
does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows is
notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task.

My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts
folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem
regardless of my method of installation.

However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to
specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a couple of
really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder of
the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on
purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not
other programs.

Virgil

  snip





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?

2013-02-26 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Well . . . .

I have over 1.5 GB of those fonts in the handwriting, script, and 
brush folder.


If you really want to look for specific fonts, you might want to try the 
free font sites.
Many of those have a large number of these types of fonts.  All you have 
to do it look and choose.


Uploading takes hours and hours.  One DVD in size takes about 10 hours 
to upload.


So, look at those free fonts sites first.  Then if you really want to 
get MY Collection, we can talk.



On 02/26/2013 03:16 PM, anne-ology wrote:

I guess it'd be asking too much for you to share your script-fonts
with me  ;-)

I've been missing them so ... ... ...
you could DropBox them - http://db.tt/QBTMH08Z



On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:



I use to go online to the different free font sites [googled them]

Now I have over 14 GB worth and over 100,000 font files.  Every so often I
do some more sorting to the different style and type folders [i.e.
handwriting, holiday, etc.].  The standard Serif and San-serif fonts are
sorted by name.

There are many, many, free font sites out there.  Some better than others.
  Right now I tend to look for ones for special usage, like letters made out
of bones, or rope, or look like wood.  That sort of thing, when I need
something I do not have.  I have a large collection of handwriting ones.
  Alway want to find better ones for different types of documents.  I
currently have over 10,000 handwritten, script, calligraphy, and brush type.



On 02/26/2013 01:41 PM, anne-ology wrote:


 and how does one acquire these nice fonts?
I sure would like to know why the good ones seem to be replaced
by these odd-character ones,
   which may or may not be some legitimate Asian language  ;-)



On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:


  I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not.  I

have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010.

The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every time
I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts to
the
/fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me any
choice.  One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it was not
something I expected would have any and did not give me the option to
say I
do not want them.

Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of
their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept,
but
it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 550
fonts to my Windows font folder.  That was a vector graphic package back
in
the Win XP days.

What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the
fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the
packages can access them.  I did that with the LO fonts including the
DejaVu ones.



On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:

  I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm

just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous.

When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message saying
something along the lines of Installing  font or words to that
effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the fonts
does the same thing as using the official install procedure. Windows
is
notorious for having a zillion different ways of accomplishing a task.

My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts
folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem
regardless of my method of installation.

However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to
specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a
couple of
really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in a subfolder
of
the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that Adobe does this on
purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to Adobe Reader and not
other programs.

Virgil

   snip






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: setting paper size

2013-02-26 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I just tried my Canon MG6220 with User 5.5 by 8.5 and it worked fine 
on LO 4.0.0.3.  I used Portrait as well.


I tried it with a Ubuntu 64-bit system.  I cold fire up my Win7 laptop 
and try it, but it worked on this Linux system.



On 02/26/2013 04:00 PM, edo1 wrote:

Nah, I rather think after seeing your results that it's just that my ip2600
is too old a printer to be able to talk to LO. As I can work around that,
I'm happy - edo1

steveedmonds wrote

On 2013-02-27 09:24, edo1 wrote:

I figured out my problem with page sizes after we discussed  the problem
here, so I thought I report what I've found.  LO and my Canon IP 2600
printer talk to each other fine in Vista x 64 as long as I choose a paper
size that's registered in LO; LO won't recognize a custom-size page that
I
create.  For example, LO doesn't recognize my custom half sheet of 5.5
x
8.5.  The closest I can come is to select the registered A5 sheet (5.83
x
8.27).  I have to do this in both LO versions 3 and 4.  While my old
sun/oracle OpenOffice was able to recognize custom sizes and it's a
bother
not to have that convenience in LO, I guess this doesn't rise to the
level
of a bug. - edo1

Hi. I just tried from LO 3.6.3 using page size USER and setting my page
size and it prints ok on a half sheet.
My printer is a Ricoh postscript printer. So may be it is a bug you have.
Steve


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
users+help@.libreoffice
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted





--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/setting-paper-size-tp4033383p4040333.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setof fonts?

2013-02-25 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I was always taught to use the install procedure.

It use to be that you can have fonts in that folder, but not being used 
by you system.  I am glad that that as been removed.


It is alway good to looks at the fonts with a font viewer just before 
you install them, so you make sure they are the ones you want.  I have 
accidentally installed a bunch of fonts that were not useful to me, when 
I was dealing with XP and Vista systems on a regular basis.  Now I use 
Ubuntu on my desktop first and Win XP and Win7 on laptops, as needed.



On 02/25/2013 01:21 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
When I install fonts to my Win7 computer, I just copy the font files 
to the C:\windows\fonts folder using Windows Explorer. I've never 
had a problem doing it this way.


Virgil

-Original Message- From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:48 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own 
distinct setof fonts?



For Win7 systems - you can see them through Control Panel  All Control
Panel Items  Fonts
which was on the left hand side of the window.

Now you can delete the fonts by right clicking on it and using the
delete option[s].
To install fonts, you must have the font setting to NOT make a link to
the font.  That is always trouble.
So from there, you just have a list of fonts in a working folder and
right click on the font[s] you want to install and use the install 
option.


That is how I do this.

The only issue is you will need to know what fonts all of you packages
use so you do not delete any needed ones.  For myself, I have over 200
items listed on my Win7 laptop and over 500 font files in my .fonts
folder on my Ubuntu desktop.


On 02/25/2013 12:29 PM, anne-ology wrote:

yikes  ;-(
and the proper way for WIN7 would be ???  ;-)
I was just about to check into finding more then plopping 
them in;

now I'll wait for further instructions.

yep ... I think this 'glorified typewriter' is making me 'feel
stupider  stupider' ...



On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:25 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:


For the Windows users, and the Linux users, you really should use 
the font

install procedures.

For Windows, there should be a font listing in its Control Panel and 
a way

to install fonts there.

For Ubuntu users, all you have to do in click on the font and it should
open the font installation window with the install button. That 
way you
can see the font before you install it.  I like that better than 
dumping

the font into the hidden .fonts folder.  This is mostly the fonts you
install after the fact and not ones installed by the OS.

If you are never going to use any non-English language, then do 
this. . .


Open LibreOffice and scroll down the list of fonts in the font 
drop-box in

the formatting toolbar.

Look at the fonts that have a name on the left and glyphs on the right.
  This will show for dinbats and icon based fonts.  ALSO it will 
show you

glyphs for the non-English/non-Latin style of fonts.

Think Arabic or an Asian language.

At that point, write down all of the font names that have these 
fonts you
do not want.  Then go to a package that has a font viewer and search 
for
the fonts, if the is no file name that matches.  I have a bunch of 
fonts

like that.

To be honest, there are other places that hold the fonts for Ubuntu, so
you will have to search for then.  BE CAREFUL not to remove any 
folders or
delete them permanently since you might have removed a needed for 
for one
of your packages.  My install of Ubuntu has many Middle Eastern and 
Asian
fonts installed by default, even though I use English for my 
language.  I
may remove most of them someday, but it will be a slow process so I 
do not
make any mistakes.  If you use Ubuntu, use the Software Center and 
look at
the font packages installed.  Then remove those that are not part of 
your

language, like India or Arabic for English.




On 02/23/2013 08:23 PM, anne-ology wrote:


 Thanks!!!



On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net 
wrote:


   On 02/23/2013 07:40 PM, anne-ology wrote:


 Thank you for responding;
  but I haven't the foggiest idea what you've said.

 the font directory of the distro  ???   ... AAMOF  ???

 I would really enjoy getting rid of all those 'junk' 
fonts ...

and
finding then dropping in the good ones;
  but I haven't a clue as to how to so do.

 ok, it's probably some simple step to locate these then 
drop them

into whatever folder ...
  but 'the more I learn of these glorified 
typewriters, the

stupider I feel'  ;-)   ;-)   ;-)


   AAMOF=as a matter of fact

You will find a bunch of directories labelled fonts. You want one 
that

has
a list of
fonts showing as subdirectories. In my distro (pclos) they're in
/usr/share:

[doug@linux1 fonts]$ ls -la
total 184
drwxr-xr-x  17 root

Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct setoffonts?

2013-02-25 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I have been using Windows since Win95 days, whether I liked it or not.  
I have been using Linux more than Windows since Feb 2010.


The only real problem I had with Windows and Fonts, was almost every 
time I installed a new packages, it seemed to want to add a set of fonts 
to the /fonts/ folder whether I wanted them or not. Some did not give me 
any choice.  One dumped almost 120 new fonts into that folder, and it 
was not something I expected would have any and did not give me the 
option to say I do not want them.


Yes, LibreOffice may, with some OS version, place fonts in a folder of 
their choosing and not mine or the normal place[s] where they are kept, 
but it is not as bad as some I have dealt with. One wanted to add over 
550 fonts to my Windows font folder.  That was a vector graphic package 
back in the Win XP days.


What I do, when I find these other font folders, is make sure I copy the 
fonts to a storage folder and then install them so the rest of the 
packages can access them.  I did that with the LO fonts including the 
DejaVu ones.



On 02/25/2013 05:40 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
I should have added my caveat that I claim no computer expertise. I'm 
just a weekend geek with enough knowledge to be dangerous.


When I copy fonts to my C:\Windows\Fonts folder, I get a message 
saying something along the lines of Installing  font or words to 
that effect. It may be (again I speak from ignorance) that copying the 
fonts does the same thing as using the official install procedure. 
Windows is notorious for having a zillion different ways of 
accomplishing a task.


My experience has been that fonts installed in the C:\Windows\Fonts 
folder are available system wide. Again, I've never had a problem 
regardless of my method of installation.


However, fonts installed in other folders may only be available to 
specific programs. For example, Adobe Reader comes bundled with a 
couple of really nice fonts (ex. Minion Pro), but it installs them in 
a subfolder of the Adobe Reader program. I've always suspected that 
Adobe does this on purpose so that the fonts are available *only* to 
Adobe Reader and not other programs.


Virgil


snip


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?

2013-02-24 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I think part of the problem is that LO does place fonts in a folder that 
is not the system's font folder.  So if the user has some DejaVu fonts 
already installed, LO may use its version of fonts over the ones the 
user installed.  Also there would be some fonts in the LO list that are 
not in the font list for any other package.


One problem may be that LO cannot install the fonts in the different 
distro's font folders.  Windows-based, DEB-based, RPM-based, Mac-based, 
systems all have different ways of installing fonts.  So it may be hard 
to get the font installation for each OS or distro of Linux to work 
properly.


Still, there are issues with package loading up a Windows systems with 
all the different fonts that they want and not the user choice of 
fonts.  Some packages require a specific font for their operation, and 
do not use the default system fonts.  That can be a problem for users 
to reduce the number of fonts in their font folder[s].  Ubuntu hides 
many fonts in their /usr/share/fonts/ folder system.  I see Type 1 fonts 
listed and I do not know why Ubuntu would need Type 1 fonts now that TTF 
and OTF fonts are the standard font format.  But, I will not remove 
them since they were installed for a reason.  The only installed fonts 
the system installed are the ones that were designed for Asian, India, 
and Arabic type of language fonts.


As for the closeness between versions of Windows, or Linux, it all 
depends on the desktop environment and where/how they store the system 
values.  Windows tends to change the placement of program and user 
data with every new version.  The only thing that seems to change 
between a Ubuntu or Debian based distro is the desktop environment.  For 
our windows users, that is the way the display show all of the needed 
items to do the work.  Think the visual differences between XP, Vista, 
Win7, and the pain of Win8. Think of how you use the Start Button or 
task bar items.  Linux has many different display types.  Ubuntu can 
have its display look many different ways.  My Ubuntu 12.04 can use the 
tile based Unity, or other desktop environments like KDE, MATE, 
Cinnamon, or a variety of others to change the look and feel of the 
desktop, making it look like different OSs, even though it is the same 
OS but different ways of seeing and using things.  I personally have 
Unity, KDE and MATE installed for my Ubuntu 12.04 system.



On 02/24/2013 03:22 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I think Win7 and Xp are so different from each other that each would qualify as 
a separate distro.  They are a bit like 2 distros from different families.  
It's not even as close as Mint or Ubuntu to Debian.

Errr, the answer was Win7 but i think that was given later in this thread.
Regards from
Tom :)







From: Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Sunday, 24 February 2013, 0:45
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of 
fonts?

   distro: the operating system on your computer (Windows, Linux, OS
X, etc.)
   AAMOF: as far as my other fonts
The latter is a guess but it seems logical. So, if you would tell us
one more time, what is your operating system. That will tell us the
location of your font folder or folders.

--Dan


On 02/23/2013 07:40 PM, anne-ology wrote:

  Thank you for responding;
   but I haven't the foggiest idea what you've said.

  the font directory of the distro  ???   ...  AAMOF  ???

  I would really enjoy getting rid of all those 'junk' fonts ... and
finding then dropping in the good ones;
   but I haven't a clue as to how to so do.

  ok, it's probably some simple step to locate these then drop them
into whatever folder ...
   but 'the more I learn of these glorified typewriters, the
stupider I feel'  ;-)   ;-)   ;-)



On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:

On 02/23/2013 06:22 PM, anne-ology wrote:

   Then how does one get these new ones into the programs for use?

As you quoted me before, you weren't reading what I said: put the

ffonts in the font directory of your distro.  they should then be
available for any program on the machine, including LO. That's
just what I did on the Mint installation.  AAMOF, I deleted all
the crap fonts that were on the machine--Liberation and a
whole batch of Asian fonts in languages I couldn't even recognize--
and just dumped in a whole directory of usable fonts--probably
True-Type, supplied on another distro that wasn't so damned PC.

--doug


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:

On 02/21/2013 12:30 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote:

I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the

operating system, or at least some of the fonts.

I'll explain my problem.

If I have a look at Character Map

Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?

2013-02-23 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
 wrote:

  On 02/23/2013 06:22 PM, anne-ology wrote:

 Then how does one get these new ones into the programs for use?

  As you quoted me before, you weren't reading what I said: put the

ffonts in the font directory of your distro.  they should then be
available for any program on the machine, including LO. That's
just what I did on the Mint installation.  AAMOF, I deleted all
the crap fonts that were on the machine--Liberation and a
whole batch of Asian fonts in languages I couldn't even recognize--
and just dumped in a whole directory of usable fonts--probably
True-Type, supplied on another distro that wasn't so damned PC.

--doug


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:

On 02/21/2013 12:30 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


  On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote:

   I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the

operating system, or at least some of the fonts.

I'll explain my problem.

If I have a look at Character Map to find a character that I want
(let's
say
it is an aeroplane), I can find it in the Webdings font (Unicode
00d2, or
Ò). See screenshot 1:

  http://nabble.**documentfoundation.org/file/**
n4039236/Character_Map.png
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Character_Map.png


But when I use that character in Libre Office and set the font to
Webdings,
it shows a different character, specifically an in-box. See
screenshot 2:

  http://nabble.**
documentfoundation.org/file/**n4039236/Libre_Office_**
characters.png
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Libre_Office_characters.png




Note that not all characters do this. For example, the first 52
characters
(A-Z and a-z) are correct.

I would like to know how to solve this discrepancy, so that I can
search
for
characters in Character Map (or an equivalent program) and then use
them
in
Libre Office. (I have tried an alternative program, Specimen Font
Viewer,
and it shows the same thing as Character Map.)

I am using Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit, fully updated) with Libre
Office
4.0.0.3 (installed directly from the Libre Office website).

Thank you.



   My 12.04 shows a list of fonts at

  /opt/libreoffice4.0/share/**fonts/truetype/


They are mostly DejaVu and Liberation fonts but there are others
listed as well.

I made sure the fonts listed there were also listed in the /.fonts/
hidden folder.  that way I had the same fonts for all my packages.





   I was recently looking at Mint, a derivative of Ubuntu, and I was


  appalled at the paucity of fonts. Liberation is ugly! You need to
find a
good
set of True-Type fonts and install them.  Then you can have, for
example,
Times-Roman.  And most of the odd-ball ones that you might use
once in your life-time. I copied the entire fonts directory from PCLOS
and
replaced the one in Mint. But I think you can get True-Type from
Microsoft, free. Not sure how you do that--Google's your friend.

--doug





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/21/2013 04:01 AM, Marc Paré wrote:

Le 2013-02-20 21:33, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit :

On 02/20/2013 05:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 14:36 20/02/2013 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote:

Europe A4 size


Perhaps that should be
everywhere-in-the-world-except-the-United-States-and-Canada A4 size.

Brian Barker




I do not know about the rest of the world.
I knew that Europe tend to use A4.

Why USA and Canada uses letter size when the rest use A4, who knows.



Here is a short history on it:

http://www.serif.com/blog/a-quick-history-on-a4-and-letter-paper-sizes/

Canada follows the US for obvious reasons. IMO, I would rather follow 
with the A4 and metric sizes, we should all be following the metric 
sizing.


Cheers,

Marc



The USA had a movement towards Metric, but it failed big-time.  We are 
using more metric in manufacturing, but for use in the home or business, 
people grew up learning the English system of feet/inches, 
pounds/ounces, cup/gallon, instead of all of the base-ten metric 
measurements.


Yes, if we taught our kids from the early ages to use metric along with 
what we use now, maybe we can get them to be more use to the metric 
system so we can move to it someday as an equal to our current system.  
Of course, business use letter size paper, letter size storage, letter 
size presentation devices to hold their letter size paper, and the list 
goes on and on.  All those things that are based on the letter size 
paper and cannot fit the A4 size paper will have to be replaced so they 
can fit both sizes - as a standard size - before business will be 
thinking about using A4 regularly.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/21/2013 12:01 PM, Paddy Landau wrote:

I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the operating
system, or at least some of the fonts.

I'll explain my problem.

If I have a look at Character Map to find a character that I want (let's say
it is an aeroplane), I can find it in the Webdings font (Unicode 00d2, or
Ò). See screenshot 1:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Character_Map.png

But when I use that character in Libre Office and set the font to Webdings,
it shows a different character, specifically an in-box. See screenshot 2:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Libre_Office_characters.png

Note that not all characters do this. For example, the first 52 characters
(A-Z and a-z) are correct.

I would like to know how to solve this discrepancy, so that I can search for
characters in Character Map (or an equivalent program) and then use them in
Libre Office. (I have tried an alternative program, Specimen Font Viewer,
and it shows the same thing as Character Map.)

I am using Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit, fully updated) with Libre Office
4.0.0.3 (installed directly from the Libre Office website).

Thank you.





My 12.04 shows a list of fonts at
/opt/libreoffice4.0/share/fonts/truetype/

They are mostly DejaVu and Liberation fonts but there are others 
listed as well.


I made sure the fonts listed there were also listed in the /.fonts/ 
hidden folder.  that way I had the same fonts for all my packages.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/21/2013 12:11 PM, James Knott wrote:

webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

The USA had a movement towards Metric, but it failed big-time.


It failed because Ronald Regan canceled Jimmy Carter's plans to move 
to it.


Economicsis the key.  We do have most things in the grocery store 
listing both English and Metric measurements.  That is for economics as 
well, since these items would not need different package designs for the 
regions of the world that speak English and use metric.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/21/2013 12:32 PM, steveedmonds wrote:


They use a page margin of  0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between
columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around
them.  This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option
active that shrinks to fit page, or similar.

The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3
column/panel brochure/flier.  I have made many brochures over the past
year with LO using this margin setup.  It might work for you.

krackedpress wrote

Here are two brochure templates.  Since Tom had some questions about
margins and such for hand folded brochures, here are the templates I
use, or at least the letter size one.

They use a page margin of  0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between
columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around
them.  This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option
active that shrinks to fit page, or similar.

The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3
column/panel brochure/flier.  I have made many brochures over the past
year with LO using this margin setup.  It might work for you.

Hi.
I also add a fine tick line a couple of mm (1/8) long  right at the edge of
the paper  in the centre of each column break, top and bottom, as folding
guides. Really fine and if necessary gray so they can just be seen.
Steve




I have made some folding guides before.  Use some dotted line that is 
really light gray and not long.  I made sure there was one on top and on 
the bottom of the page so the folder could use them to line up the edge.


For LO, I would use
Separator line
the dotted line
0.25pt width
35%
Centered
Gray 10%

or something similar if I was printing in bw or a color that matches 
the color of the paper.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/21/2013 05:58 PM, John Talbut wrote:

On 21/02/13 19:07, Paddy Landau wrote:

jowyta wrote

Webdings is a M$ font, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webdings
and is not Unicode.


Yes, the font is not Unicode; the font is merely the way to display a
character. The character is Ò (Unicode D2), but the Webdings font 
displays

it as an aeroplane rather than as a capital O with an accent on top.

The Webdings font is installed on my machine.

Unfortunately, this doesn't answer the question; why is Libre Office 
using

the wrong character for the font?


I think it is a question of what you define as wrong. LibreOffice 
uses Unicode and will correctly display Unicode characters in any font 
that includes the character.


The allocation of character codes to Webdings does not seem to be 
consistent and I have been unable to find an authoritative list. I 
have Webdings installed (it comes with ttf-mscorefonts via Debian).  
In my case the Ò character also displays as an inbox tray character 
using Webdings, the Webding aeroplane character code does not seem to 
display anything in other fonts.


So I think the answer to this question is that what LibreOffice 
displays depends on which Webdings font you have installed on your 
machine.  The font is not part of LibreOffice.


I think the answer to solving the discrepancy is to stick to Unicode 
fonts which should be consistent across all systems.




I have seen this issue with same font name but different font.  I have 
two fonts that call themselves Garamond but look different side by 
side.  Then there are the fonts that are touted to be the same, with the 
same file name, but are different depending on where it came from or 
even the version from the same font designer.  That is why I have over 
100,000 of them and many with the same name.


Now, if you really need a character glyph, that is not a letter, to be 
the same between systems, make it an image and use that and not a font.  
99 times out of 100, the receiver of the document will not have your 
specialty font installed or even the same version installed, so their 
document will look different.  That is why I never send editable 
documents to a person that I know might not have the EXACT font[s] that 
I am using.  I do not even use Export to PDF, but CUPS-PDF.  I know 
CUPS-PDF will embed the font but I do not know if Export to PDF will 
embed the more specialty ones.  I just have not compared all my fonts 
since 3.4 days with a system that does not have my core 400+ font 
files - most versions/styles of/for font names like DejaVu and other 
ones that I may use a lot and the others are very specialty ones that 
are used for decorative needs.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letterand A4 sizes

2013-02-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I use inches, but I have used cm when I needed to create a drawing 
that used a scale of say 1 cm per foot or some other thing that was 
large and needed to fit on a letter size paper, like a building 's 
network layout to scale.  Try making a building the size of a football 
field [American-football or soccer-football] onto one letter size page.


But, whenever I work with printed documents and not drawings, I use inches.

I am use to doing it.  The people I deal with are use to it.  If I was 
going to use picas or any other measurement, they would not understand 
me.  I have had laid printing type before so I use to deal with 
typesetting, but that was in the 70's and long before a computer was 
smaller than a refrigerator and not a desktop item. Now with desktop 
publishing and all that comes with it, typesetting concepts seem to no 
longer be something businesses are willing to deal with.  Even 
professional printer hardly ever use a printing press that uses hand 
laid type anymore.  It is all computer based and transfered to printing 
plates via laser and photo methods.


SO
like most I know, I use whatever is easiest for me to deal with. I know 
of some people that use metric for most of their work, and they live 
within a mile or three from me in New York State USA and our 
inch/foot/yard system.  The same goes with software.  I have not learned 
draw, yet, since I use other vector-graphics package for too many years 
to stop now and relearn another free package to do the same.  I use 
Inkscape for Windows and Linux, and before that I used Corel Draw.


So, if you prefer to use picas, points, or some other measurement, then 
that is what works the best for you and no one can say their's would be 
the measurement method over yours.  There are too many people that 
believe that, even if they can be proven wrong.


But, I also define web page fonts by points instead of any other size 
measurement in my style sheets [.css].  But that is not what was asked.



On 02/21/2013 06:19 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:

Let me shift gears slightly.

What measurement unit do y'all use in your Writer rulers and 
margin/spacing settings. I've set mine to use Picas, which is a 
traditional unit of measurement for typesetting. It's equal to 1/6 
inch and provides for very tight control of a document.


Do others use Picas? If not, what are you using?

Virgil

-Original Message- From: Virgil Arrington
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:46 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: brochure templates for letterand 
A4 sizes



Children throughout the world can do it. Even you could!  You'll

never do it until you determine to do so; the only problem is that
you haven't yet tried.

You're absolutely right, I haven't tried, because I've had no reason 
to. My
system has worked for me (and my fellow Americans) for my entire 57 
years on

Earth. Until it stops working, I'm quite happy to keep using it.

I guess my point is that having something better isn't necessarily 
enough
motivation to produce change. I fully agree that the metric system is 
better

than the English. But, my English system works. I fully and accurately
measure things every day with it, and I effectively communicate those
measurements to others. Until it stops working, I have little 
motivation to

change.

Virgil





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] no longer can erase the .config/libreoffice files and get them remade

2013-02-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I had some problems with LO4 and I just did the erase/removal of the 
/libreoffice/ in the .config folder.  Well it caused these two errors, 
even after I reinstalled LO 4.


We use to just rename the .libreoffice folder, but not it is in the 
.config folder.  When I renamed the /libreoffice/ folder [which has 
both /3 and /4 folders] and restarted LO4, I got the following errors.  
Then I reinstalled LO4 [64-bit DEB] and I still got the errors.  
Something is not right here.



Error loading BASIC of document 
file:///home/timothy/.config/libreoffice/4/user/basic/Standard/script.xlb/:

General Error.
General input/output error.


Error loading BASIC of document 
file:///home/timothy/.config/libreoffice/4/user/basic/Standard/dialog.xlb/:

General Error.
General input/output error.

--

By-the-way

can I remove the .libreoffice folder since LO now has its stuff in 
the .config folder system?




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes

2013-02-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Here are two brochure templates.  Since Tom had some questions about 
margins and such for hand folded brochures, here are the templates I 
use, or at least the letter size one.


They use a page margin of  0.4 inches and a 0.8 inch margin between 
columns, so each of the 3 panels will have a 0.4 inch margin around 
them.  This works as long as you make sure there is no printer option 
active that shrinks to fit page, or similar.


The margin of 0.4 inches work well for the hand folding of these 3 
column/panel brochure/flier.  I have made many brochures over the past 
year with LO using this margin setup.  It might work for you.


US Letter size
http://libreoffice-na.us/brochure-template-1.ott

Europe A4 size
http://libreoffice-na.us/brochure-template-1--a4.ott


If someone want me to, I can make them a bit better and with 
instructions on how to use them for the different folding styles. Then 
they can be placed into the Template Center.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: another funny one from ZdNet

2013-02-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/20/2013 04:19 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 02/20/2013 02:52 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:18:44PM +0600, Urmas wrote:

The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments
have a hilarious amount of FUD in them.  One wonders if they have
ever even tried either MSO or LO.

Most people who own StarOffice or many of its forks don't use it.
They just open and print documents with it. If someone tried to
actually use it as a word processor, he would find some of 5+ years
old bugs and lack of features much earlier.
Nowadays there is no free alternative to MS Office suite and costly
third-party utilities: spellchecker, bibliography/formula editors
and so on.

That's a hilarious statement from someone posting to a list dedicated to
a free alternative to MS Office.


When was the last version released?



Are you talking about release of StarOffice or LO?

No free alternative to MSO?  No spell checkers, etc.? Something is not 
right somewhere.


LO is touted as THE best alternative to MSO.  How many spell checking 
dictionaries do you want?  200+ is my last count, with about 20 
localized Spanish ones.  My own American English one has over 797,000 
words in it.  Grammar checkers are the problem, though.  No one makes 
one that works well for all its users.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] brochure templates for letter and A4 sizes

2013-02-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/20/2013 05:11 PM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 14:36 20/02/2013 -0500, Tim Lungstrom wrote:

Europe A4 size


Perhaps that should be 
everywhere-in-the-world-except-the-United-States-and-Canada A4 size.


Brian Barker




I do not know about the rest of the world.
I knew that Europe tend to use A4.

Why USA and Canada  uses letter size when the rest use A4, who knows.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Any plans to incorporate anything from the Lotus Symphony UI?

2013-02-19 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/19/2013 11:56 AM, Joel Madero wrote:

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:44 AM, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote:


On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:


Hello,

I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony UI
code to AOO...

Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the ribbon
in MSO, but would love to see the UI with a decent facelift/refresh...


As far as I know there are no such plans.


Best Regards,
Joel

The only thing I heard about this, in the past, was the possibilityof 
adding Tabbed documents, like you find in browsers using new tab or 
new window. Adding that might take a lot of work.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes

2013-02-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


sorry, should not have popped off like that.  Going to a major doctor 
appointment in an hour or so.


I tried to darken the skin, but no matter how dark I make it, it does 
not look good with light/white text - unless I go very dark.


Will make it into a theme and see if it gets approved.


On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use White 
text.


It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop.

So decide, dark background and white text or light background with the 
default black text.


OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox and 
get it approved.  Then use that one.



On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up.  I have 2 
that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot darker than the 
other.  I put correct in single quotes because i think both those 
monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images.

Regards from
Tom :)







From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 
Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes


I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design 
works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.

Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes

2013-02-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


You have to define it during the submission process.  You give it a 
name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and 
accent colors for menu text.


I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the 
designer chose the wrong color for the user.


I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for the 
light background.  Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that will 
look good with some colored text.  I test my persona/theme designs with 
Firefox before I submit them.  I do not know of a way to do that with 
LibreOffice, but maybe later.


Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them 
know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for your 
system.


My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but a 
user on this list stated it was not working for them.  SO, I decided 
to make a really dark version of the same theme and using white text 
instead of black.


Sorry this does not help you.  For me there are a lot of themes out 
there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where the 
text color was not standing out enough to use.



On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so,
how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from
Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is
to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in
the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in
Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background.


On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use
White text.

It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop.

So decide, dark background and white text or light background with
the default black text.

OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox
and get it approved.  Then use that one.


On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up.
I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot
darker than the other.  I put correct in single quotes because
i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good
for editing images. Regards from Tom :)






 From: Urmas
davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent:
Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re:
Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO
4.0.0Persona/Themes


I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona
design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.

Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable.



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=H/GQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes

2013-02-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

Edit:

Just noticed that LibreOffice does not use the defined text coloring.
I do not know where you can change the font color of the menus.

So, I wonder why LO is not using the persona/theme menu colors. Since 
LO's menu text color is black, you will have to use the lighter colored 
themes.



On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


You have to define it during the submission process.  You give it a 
name, define the header and footer images, and you define the text and 
accent colors for menu text.


I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if the 
designer chose the wrong color for the user.


I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for 
the light background.  Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds that 
will look good with some colored text.  I test my persona/theme 
designs with Firefox before I submit them.  I do not know of a way to 
do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later.


Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let them 
know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not work for 
your system.


My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's but 
a user on this list stated it was not working for them.  SO, I 
decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using 
white text instead of black.


Sorry this does not help you.  For me there are a lot of themes out 
there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others where 
the text color was not standing out enough to use.



On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so,
how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona from
Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct menu is
to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in
the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide, but in
Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the background.


On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to use
White text.

It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7 laptop.

So decide, dark background and white text or light background with
the default black text.

OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to Firefox
and get it approved.  Then use that one.


On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is set-up.
I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one is a lot
darker than the other.  I put correct in single quotes because
i think both those monitors are a bit wonky and wouldn't be good
for editing images. Regards from Tom :)






 From: Urmas
davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent:
Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re:
Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO
4.0.0Persona/Themes


I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona
design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.

Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable.



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=H/GQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes

2013-02-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Yes, they defined the text to be white, but LibreOffice does not use 
that color definition, or something like that.  LO does not use the 
footer image, either, is seems.





On 02/18/2013 01:57 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hmm, I thought it was something in the original skin I've seen it
referenced that determined the text color. I use the same persona for
Firefox, Thunderbird and LO 4.0. In Firefox and Thunderbird the text
in question is white, but in LO it's black. Just for your info, its
Star Trek by lolodetahiti.


On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

You have to define it during the submission process.  You give it
a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the
text and accent colors for menu text.

I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if
the designer chose the wrong color for the user.

I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black for
the light background.  Maybe later, I will make some backgrounds
that will look good with some colored text.  I test my
persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them.  I do not
know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later.

Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let
them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not
work for your system.

My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and another's
but a user on this list stated it was not working for them.  SO,
I decided to make a really dark version of the same theme and using
white text instead of black.

Sorry this does not help you.  For me there are a lot of themes
out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or others
where the text color was not standing out enough to use.


On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote: When you say White
text are you referring to the menu bar text? If so, how do you get
it to display in white? I'm using a persona from Firefox and I have
click on a spot where I think the correct menu is to get the drop
down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the text in the menu bar is
white so the black background doesn't hide, but in Libre the text
remains in black, so the text is lost in the background.


On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to
use White text.

It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7
laptop.

So decide, dark background and white text or light background
with the default black text.

OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to
Firefox and get it approved.  Then use that one.


On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is
set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but one
is a lot darker than the other.  I put correct in single
quotes because i think both those monitors are a bit wonky
and wouldn't be good for editing images. Regards from Tom
:)






 From: Urmas
davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject:
[libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0
Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes


I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1
Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.

Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable.







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes

2013-02-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Yes, the Star Trek theme/persona has defined the color of the menu text 
to white [or there about] and LibreOffice does not pick up the specified 
font color.


IT might be fixed for the next version, but I would think someone will 
need to make a bug report for it.  Maybe then it can be officially 
addressed as a bug.




On 02/18/2013 02:08 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I had replied to your prior post before reading this one so sorry if
it comes across a little weird. I did find the link to the specific
persona/theme if you want to check it out:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/star-trek-182292/


On 02/18/2013 12:44 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Edit:

Just noticed that LibreOffice does not use the defined text
coloring. I do not know where you can change the font color of the
menus.

So, I wonder why LO is not using the persona/theme menu colors.
Since LO's menu text color is black, you will have to use the
lighter colored themes.


On 02/18/2013 12:34 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

You have to define it during the submission process.  You give it
a name, define the header and footer images, and you define the
text and accent colors for menu text.

I do not know of any way to change the menu text in a persona if
the designer chose the wrong color for the user.

I try to use either a white color for dark backgrounds or black
for the light background.  Maybe later, I will make some
backgrounds that will look good with some colored text.  I test
my persona/theme designs with Firefox before I submit them.  I do
not know of a way to do that with LibreOffice, but maybe later.

Of course, if you can get a hold of the designer, you could let
them know that a specific theme and its menu text color did not
work for your system.

My light reptile skin worked well with my systems, and
another's but a user on this list stated it was not working for
them.  SO, I decided to make a really dark version of the same
theme and using white text instead of black.

Sorry this does not help you.  For me there are a lot of themes
out there that seemed to have dark images and dark text, or
others where the text color was not standing out enough to use.


On 02/18/2013 12:03 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:

When you say White text are you referring to the menu bar text? If
so, how do you get it to display in white? I'm using a persona
from Firefox and I have click on a spot where I think the correct
menu is to get the drop down. In Firefox and Thunderbird all of the
text in the menu bar is white so the black background doesn't hide,
but in Libre the text remains in black, so the text is lost in the
background.


On 02/18/2013 08:25 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Well, I could make it much darker, but then I would have to
use White text.

It looks good on my Ubuntu's LCD monitor, and my Win7
laptop.

So decide, dark background and white text or light
background with the default black text.

OR you could go and make a theme yourself and submit it to
Firefox and get it approved.  Then use that one.


On 02/18/2013 07:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :) I guess it depends somewhat on how your monitor is
set-up. I have 2 that are both supposedly 'correct' but
one is a lot darker than the other.  I put correct in
single quotes because i think both those monitors are a
bit wonky and wouldn't be good for editing images.
Regards from Tom :)






 From: Urmas
davian...@gmail.com To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 February 2013, 5:16 Subject:
[libreoffice-users] Re: Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0
Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0Persona/Themes


I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1
Persona design works out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.

Seriously? It's so bright that it's unusable.









--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Reptile Skin design for a 4.0.0 Persona / 33+ designs for LO 4.0.0 Persona/Themes

2013-02-17 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P



I really like how my LibreOffice Reptile Skin 1 Persona design works 
out on LibreOffice 4.0.0.


http://libreoffice-na.us/libreoffice-reptile-skin-1--lo40-clip.jpg

Here are the current Firefox Persona/Themes with the key word of 
LibreOffice.


https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0

I like patterns and other things.  So I am working on those right now.

If I had some good graphics and photos that might work well as design 
for LO themes, I might do them as well.


I could use some constructive comments though.  We all could. Designing 
a Persona/Theme for Firefox is one thing, but making one that was 
created for LiberOffice is a different thing.


Do we want it to have LibreOffice show as a text image there or just 
some nice graphics or images?


I would be nice to know what our users like for color schemes or 
background ideas.  There are Green, Blue, Orange, Purple, and Yellow 
colors specified in the Branding Wiki.  I am working on green ideas, 
since I choose a green themed desktop.  But if there are others who 
would prefer Blues or other branded colors, I could work on them.  
Since LibreOffice does not have any Mascot, but there were ideas on that 
a while back, I may try my had at that type of image.  But it really is 
up to the users of LO 4.0 to decide what they would like.


Actually having you Firefox browser have an LO themed background image 
for its menu system, would be a form of advertising, it may not be for 
every one.


Let all of us, who want to create these Persona/Themes for LibreOffice 
[and Firefox], know what you would like to see from use as themes and 
artwork.


--

By the way, it would be easier for people to design these themes, if 
there was a way to test them like you can do on the Firefox browser.  
Just a thought.  Right now we have to design them and submit them to 
Firefox for approval.  It the new design it too close to one of your 
other designs or someones else's, it will be rejected.  My green rough 
paper with the LO text was approved, but to just have that background 
and not text was not since it was too much like the text version.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4

2013-02-14 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/13/2013 11:31 PM, C. H. D. wrote:


Hello!


I did not find pixels in LibreOffice:

Tools - Options - LibreOffice Draw

- General - Unit of measurement

  
That was why I used cm instead.


Thanks.

Regards,
C. H. D.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


snip

https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/demo_create

This is Firefox's site that walks you through the creation of Persona 
designs.  Since LibreOffice uses their Persona guidelines, currently, I 
am going by their information.


They describe using a header image of 3000 pixels wide by 200 pixels high.
The footer size is 3000 pixels by 100 pixels.
They also have a file size limit of no more than 300KB for the images 
[total size of the two combined, I believe].


Now here it the sticking point.
Draw seems to want you to create pages, not specific images, like Corel 
Draw and Inkscape.  You must be able to create a specific image size, in 
pixels, and I do not know how to do that in Draw.


I just looked - There is a Pixel definition in the File  Export using 
the exporting to a JPG format.  There you can take your design and make 
it the correct pixel size.  All you have to do it make the image 
proportional to the needed pixel size. Make your page/image be in 
centimeters and use a box 300 by 20 cm in size for your design area.  
Then export it to the 3000 by 200 pixels.


- - - -

What I did when I created a felt texture Persona was this:

I created a page wide design using all of the filters and texture-fills 
that Inkscape has.  I played around with them till I got a background 
image that I liked.  That was using vector graphics way of making 
designs, the way Inkscape and Draw does.


Then I exported the design to a bitmap image that is pixel based, like 
photos are.  I made sure it was exported to be at least 3000 pixels wide 
and 200 high.


Then I used a package, like GIMP, Paint Shop Pro, or Photoshop, to do 
some editing of the image to get the final design to be EXACTLY the 3000 
pixel width and the 200 and 100 pixel high required for the Firefox 
specifications for a Persona.


At that point I tested the Persona design, to make sure it did look well 
and was not interfering with the header and footer menu and icons.  If 
you want to use it for LibreOffice 4.0.x and/or Firefox, you test the 
design[s] and tweak them before you decide they are working well for you.


At that point, currently, you can go through the posting process to get 
your Persona listed in the Firefox Gallery.  It is a simple process.


I have asked the question about the approval process and a gallery 
placement within a LibreOffice page, like we have fore templates and 
extensions.  We need approval if we use the official logo[s] for 
LibreOffice and TDF.


So, look into the Person design specifications on Firefox's page.  See 
if there is a way to create and export an image to a specific pixel 
size.  Since I have not learned how to use Draw properly, I do not know 
this process.



- - - -

I use Corel Draw and Inkscape for my vector graphics images and Paint 
Shop Pro [5] and GIMP for the bitmap/pixel editing work.  I use 
Ubuntu/Linux for my default OS on my desktop that I do most of my work.  
I use Inkscape and GIMP on them.  I do use a Win7 and a Win XP/pro 
laptop[s] that I have Corel Draw, Inkscape, Paint Shop Pro [5] and GIMP 
installed on them.  I have been using specific packages for specific 
design processes. Since I have used Paint Shop Pro 5 [and other] for 
many year before I looked into using any Linux system, I find it easier 
to use it for some image editing needs.  Since I now use Linux for my 
desktop, I have been learning how it use GIMP for these editing processes.


To be honest, right now, I do not know much about Draw's abilities and 
how to use it properly.  It seems to be a vector graphics editor.  It 
would be nice if I learned that package well enough to use it for that, 
but I know other vector graphic package much better and therefore easier 
for me to do the needed design work.  I have been using some packages 
since they came out in the Windows 95/98 and XP days.  You use what it 
easier for you to use.  Maybe I will take the time to learn how to use 
Draw as well as I know the other packages, but that is not for the near 
future.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Strange fonts on my Windows system

2013-02-14 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/14/2013 05:33 AM, William Drago wrote:

All,

I have a bunch of fonts on my Windows system that have weird names 
like cmbx6 Regular, cmdunh10 Regular, cmsltt10 Regular... Did these 
come with LibreOffice and if so what are they for? Also, why such 
cryptic names?


Thanks,
Bill



They are system fonts, or so I have been told.  Some packages and 
utilities withinthe Windows system may be using them for displaying 
text.  The Command Line could use them.  Some of the windowtext menu 
and titles displayed may use them.


If these fonts were not installed by you, but are shown in you font 
list, DO NOT REMOVE them.  If they are used by Windows or its utilities, 
you may have a big problem on your hands.  I accidentally removed a font 
that I thought I did not need from an XP system.  I did not know that 
that font name [several fonts styles] was used by Windows.  I really had 
some weird looking menu texts till I fixed the problem.


There are a lot of fonts that are installed by Windows, or Linux, that 
is used only by the system and was not intended to be used as a font 
in a normal document created by Writer or other package. Even though 
all of these extra fonts are listed in the font menus, I just avoid 
them and not delete/uninstall them.  You may never know what fonts are 
being used by the OS or a package.  I do know that some packages install 
specific fonts on your Windows [and Linux] system to be used as their 
default font[s] in their packages in one way or another.  LibreOffice 
has a set of fonts.  When I type in LibreOffice in my Linux package 
manager I get fonts-opensymbol 2:102.2+LibO. . .   listed in the 
search for LibreOffice.


For me, there are many, many fonts that are listed in my font list in 
Writer, to choose from.  Many of them were placed there by Ubuntu [or 
Windows] when it was installed or one of the packages I installed 
afterwards.  These fonts are not ones I would use in my documents, but I 
accept that they are there and I should not delete them, no matter how 
weird they look or are names.  I have over 400 fonts and their styles 
listed in my Writer font drop down option. Many are there as core 
fonts I use for various projects, and may were placed there when I 
installed Ubuntu 12.04, MATE desktop environment, and all of the various 
packages I installed and use. Even though it makes is a pain to go 
through all of these extra fonts I may never use in a document or 
project, I will not risk deleting them.  I learned this the hard way.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4

2013-02-13 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


In the Persona instructions on the Firefox page that help you through 
the process, they tell you the exact size of the image files.  Also, 
there are some example download images files to start the process as 
well.  I looked into this last month.  What I would do is download the 
image files they use as examples and then use them.  These files are 
shown in pixels not inches or any other measurement.  That is best.





On 02/13/2013 03:00 AM, C. H. D. wrote:

Hello!

Great to share how to make Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4!

It is very hard to measure the size of the image to be used in a Firefox 
Persona. Feel free to learn more about that:

Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4
http://youtu.be/AZeZzxN83HE

After trying many times, I got the right size of the image and submitted the 
Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4.

http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0


For your information, in LibreOffice Draw:

Header image
Width: 82.00cm or 32.28
Height: 5.52cm or 2.17

Footer image
Width: 82.00cm or 32.28
Height: 2.77cm or 1.09

The gradient background is recommended.

Regards,

C. H. D.

  






_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4

2013-02-13 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Just created a Felt style of a background with the text of LibreOffice.
I submitted it and there are 44 in the queue for review.

The header was 3000px by 200 px
The footer was 3000px by 100px

all according to their web page.
https://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/demo_create

Simple and easy.

On 02/13/2013 03:00 AM, C. H. D. wrote:

Hello!

Great to share how to make Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4 in LibreOffice 4!

It is very hard to measure the size of the image to be used in a Firefox 
Persona. Feel free to learn more about that:

Create Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4
http://youtu.be/AZeZzxN83HE

After trying many times, I got the right size of the image and submitted the 
Firefox Personas for LibreOffice 4.

http://www.getpersonas.com/en-US/gallery/All/search?p=libreofficesearch.x=0search.y=0


For your information, in LibreOffice Draw:

Header image
Width: 82.00cm or 32.28
Height: 5.52cm or 2.17

Footer image
Width: 82.00cm or 32.28
Height: 2.77cm or 1.09

The gradient background is recommended.

Regards,

C. H. D.

  






_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/12/2013 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:

On 2013-02-10 10:27 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

I do not like all that typing.

What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived
file and unarchive it.  Then I take the folder that is created and
rename it to Lib or LibO.  That way you do not need to type all of the
characters of the folder's name.


Never heard of 'tab-completion'?

Try hitting the tab key after typing one or two characters of the 
folder name and see what happens...




Never heard of this.  Never know of the Tab completion in the Terminal.

Does it work with the Terminal that is in GNOME, MATE, Unity, KDE?  How 
about the one that comes with openSUSE and other non-Ubuntu systems.  I 
have been told that Debian and Ubuntu is growing apart so some distros 
are showing both Ubuntu-based and Debian-based versions.


What happens when you have two folders that are similar characters, 
except some difference?

 LibreOffice-4.0-installsvs. LibreOffice-3.6-installs?
You would have to make sure you go out till the difference?

I tend to unarchive all of the downloaded file for my version at the 
same time.  For me, that is just the main install and the help pack.


   /To be honest, I never really got into doing all that much with the
   terminal.  I prefer to use a GUI to do the work. There are a very
   large amount of things that the terminal can do that I do not know
   of, or how to do those things that might help me once and a while. 
   I just never bought or download and GOODand easy to understand

   reference to what you can do in the terminal.  Of course, there are
   different ways to do things in a Ubuntu/Debian system than you would
   do the same thing in a openSUSE or RPM system.  Different commands
   and such. //
   //
   //I have tried things that others say work for the, but does not
   work in my install of Ubuntu. That is one reason I have a laptop
   that has a partition that I use to test new versions of Ubuntu and
   desktop environments.  I do not want to upgrade my 5 TB production
   desktop and then find that something is not right.  I did the
   upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 on the laptop and it worked fine, but
   totally crashed on my desktop causing me to need to wipe the system
   and do a fresh install.  I really did not want to have to reinstall
   all of the packages over again, but in the end I had no choice to do
   so and move my data files from my external backup drive.  That took
   days to complete./


SO
I do not experiment with things on the Terminal, or almost never.

I would love to experiment and see about creating a script that would 
automate the install of LO from an earlier versionusing something like 
sh libre-update.run and then have it do the removal of the older 
version and install the newer one.  I could place it in the folderthat 
contains the DEBS folder so it will be version independent. But, if I 
do something wrong, how bad will it go wrong? So right now I am not 
going toexperiment that way.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Feature Request

2013-02-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
I know this is a bad time, since 4.0 was just released, but 
improvement is an ongoing process.


For the 'recent documents' menu selection under 'file', it would be 
nice to:

1) allow us to set the number of recent documents, under tools/options.
2) allow us, in the recent menu, to right click and set certain files 
to 'permanent' so
they will not fifo off the stack.  An asterisk (blue?) could act 
as a visual flag.


John




I remember seeing some packages that allow you to define the number of 
recent documents are kept in the queue.  I never seen the permanent 
one, but that would be an interesting thing to have.  That way, if you 
are actively working on editing and updating documents on a regular 
basis, you do not have them removed from the recent list because you 
were required to do some other more pressing and time sensitive work. I 
wonder how it might be done.


Also, it would be nice to be able to clear the list from time to time to 
keep other users of a shared system from snooping into what work you 
are doing for others.  I knows this might dealt with only using user 
accounts that point to user only folders, but I have worked at places 
where you did not have that ability of keeping your work away from the 
other users of the system.  Even if you used thumbdrives to store the 
data files, the other users could access the list of files you worked 
on.  Wiping work history would be a good thing for some.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Changing the LibreOffice icons (Linux)

2013-02-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/12/2013 03:29 PM, IBBoard wrote:

I don't know if this is the best place (I couldn't see a developer
mailing list outside the internal-focused ones) but here goes.

I use LibreOffice on openSUSE Linux. I've got a custom icon set that
replaces the application icons for LibreOffice. This works fine for
launcher icons, but once the program is running (e.g. I'm editing a file
in LO Writer) then the current app icon and the Alt-Tab app switcher
use the original icons (upscaled horribly from about 24x24 to 64x64).

As best as I can tell, Gnome is honouring the _NET_WM_ICON property of
the window, which does show the old style icons when you query it with
xprop.

I'm not talking about the toolbar icons, which I know there are multiple
themes that I can select from, but the actual launcher icon, and the one
that Gnome Shell uses to show you which app is running.

Is it possible to either a) get LibreOffice to use my theme's icons for
_NET_WM_ICON or b) replace some files pre-build, and if so, which ones?

I've got an account that already has some repackaged software on the
openSUSE Build Service (OBS), so I'm not afraid of patching packages, if
that is the only option :)

Thanks.


Maybe the solution is to include other icon sizes, like 24x24 and 64x64, 
or maybe larger ones, for those systems that might need or use them.  
Small, medium, large, and extra-large, icons might work for those who 
are on systems where you can change the icon size. I think Win7 has only 
two icon sizes to choose from.  I do not remember seeing that option in 
my Ubuntu/MATE install, though.  It could be there and I never seen 
where the option resides.


So, maybe there might be a need for icon sizes other than the two being 
used already.


Debian install[s] show
icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png\
icon16x16=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png

Could there be an icon24x24 and icon64x64 added to the 
desktop-integration system?

How many systems would work with more than just the default two sizes?


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] How can I create a certificate border?

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/11/2013 10:22 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:

Hi

Is there a way to create an elaborate border in LibreOffice/Draw? I'd
like to create a certficate. I tried searching for freely-licensed
templates for this and didn't find any.

Thanks in advance for any help with this.

F.



Fabian

Not finding certificate borders is weird.  Last year I need some and I 
found a lot.


This one has a few template background images.
http://all-free-download.com/free-vector/free-certificate-template.html

Some will require you to print to  PDF file and then use Draw to import 
it to create a JPG background image.  But there are solutions.


I also have found some in places like OpenClipart.org and other sites.  
Sometimes there are listed under borders.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


The only typing I do is the

cd Lib
cd DEBS
sudo dpkg -i *.deb
cd desktop-integration
sudo dpkg -i *.deb[using up arrow till I get to that command]

No long folder or file names if you unpack the folder/files via the GUI 
file manager and archive package, then rename the folder to Lib.


I do the same thing for the help packs.

I do as little typing as I can.




On 02/11/2013 12:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
You don't need to do all that typing anyway.  Just press the tab key a few 
times and the terminal cleverly works out what you are aiming for.  It takes a 
bit of working out how it works at first but it's a real boon once you get used 
to it.  Renaming is not a bad idea though as it clarifies exactly what is what.

I thnk it inspired those old mobile phones that had predictive texting wy 
before smart-phones arrived.  Hmmm, thinking about it i wonder what OS they were running! 
;)  Unfortunately the phones version of predictive text was quite a bit different and a 
bit of a pita for a lot of people.  Dunno how often my phone called my best buddy a cow!

This has beena  great thread!  Thanks all :)  It's given me a lot to try out.
Regards from
Tom :)







From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 3:27
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb



I do not like all that typing.

What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived file and 
unarchive it.  Then I take the folder that is created and rename it to Lib or LibO.  That 
way you do not need to type all of the characters of the folder's name.  I also do not 
use the desktop as the storage place fore the unarchived folder[s].

I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager to remove 
the LO packages from the previous version that was installed.  Works well for me.

Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] where the 
dpkg command is needed.  Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was taught to go to the 
folder[s] where my files are to run them.  That is what I try to do.  The only time I do not is 
when I have a launcher icon to work with on my desktop.  I prefer to use the GUI more than the 
terminal anyways.  Easier on my fingers and my typing skills after 3 strokes.  So I do things as 
easy as I can, or easy as I can remember to do/use.




On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote:

Tom,

I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on three 
machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No issues 
installing or using it. The bug that made some functions in Base run 
unacceptably slow have been fixed!!!

*Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:*
Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop.
Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you the folder 
LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb
Run the following terminal commands to install it:
1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.*
2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb
3. sudo dpkg -i 
~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb
4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the different 
components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply drag the icons for them over to where 
you wish to have them in the launcher bar.

If you install it in this manner using the official Document Foundation 
version, and you type libreoffice in the command line, I get the following:

The program 'libreoffice' is currently not installed. You can install it by 
typing:
sudo apt-get install libreoffice-common

An install as shown above does not have any repository from which it 
originated. Therefore there aren't any updates, which I understand. If it 
showed up as an installed program, Ubuntu would try to update the LibreOffice 
with its own version which would lead to a royal mess!! I did not get a 
message saying there is a missing package like you did.

Don


On 02/10/2013 09:59 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

Tom
I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it.


On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried
installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice
from the command-line by typing in

libreoffice

I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was 
missing a package called something like


libreoffice-common

when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration
folders i found there was one!  I'm sure it's been there in previous
releases?!  However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything
then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it.


So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd
way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I now have the terminal commands in a text document.  I keep forgetting 
the remove command's text.  So I just use the package manager to 
remove the previous version.


Maybe there could be a sh libre-update.run type of command made and 
placed in the archived folder one level up from the DEBS folder.  Then 
all someone needs to so is run one command in the terminal that would do 
everything else.  Make it generic so it would not need changing for 
every version.  Do the same for the RPM installs.


How easy would it be then?  run one command that will do everything for 
you so it would not take any other typing, except your password, to get 
the Linux versions installed.  Windows users get one double clicking of 
the file, plus the custom install options, to install LO.  Have a 
simple single line command to remove the old version of LO and install 
the new one would be really nice.


Still, some Linux users would not like that.  It would make my life 
easier sometimes.



On 02/11/2013 12:50 PM, Don C. Myers wrote:

Hi All,

A simple copy and paste works really well!! No typing necessary. 
Just make sure you have the file saved as a .txt that you open with 
GEdit.


When I was new to Linux (Ubuntu) and didn't understand anything about 
what the system was really doing or about the file structure, 
OpenOffice was updated, and it wasn't going to be included for Ubuntu 
users until the next update, which was three or 4 months down the 
road. I ran across this method as a way to update my OpenOffice 
without waiting. The same thing took place with the next OpenOffice 
release. Again I found the updated instructions on the Internet. I 
still use this as it is easy to update computers. I've installed 
Ubuntu on about 23 or so. It is also easy for a new person to Ubuntu 
since they don't have to understand changing directories, etc. Simple 
extract the download to the desktop, and then copy and paste the three 
commands into the terminal.


Don


On 02/11/2013 12:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
You don't need to do all that typing anyway.  Just press the tab key 
a few times and the terminal cleverly works out what you are aiming 
for.  It takes a bit of working out how it works at first but it's a 
real boon once you get used to it.  Renaming is not a bad idea though 
as it clarifies exactly what is what.


I thnk it inspired those old mobile phones that had predictive 
texting wy before smart-phones arrived.  Hmmm, thinking about it 
i wonder what OS they were running! ;)  Unfortunately the phones 
version of predictive text was quite a bit different and a bit of a 
pita for a lot of people.  Dunno how often my phone called my best 
buddy a cow!


This has beena  great thread!  Thanks all :)  It's given me a lot to 
try out.

Regards from
Tom :)







From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 3:27
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb



I do not like all that typing.

What I do is use the default file manager and double click the 
archived file and unarchive it.  Then I take the folder that is 
created and rename it to Lib or LibO.  That way you do not need to 
type all of the characters of the folder's name.  I also do not use 
the desktop as the storage place fore the unarchived folder[s].


I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager 
to remove the LO packages from the previous version that was 
installed.  Works well for me.


Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] 
where the dpkg command is needed.  Long ago, in my mainframe days, 
I was taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to run them.  
That is what I try to do.  The only time I do not is when I have a 
launcher icon to work with on my desktop.  I prefer to use the GUI 
more than the terminal anyways.  Easier on my fingers and my typing 
skills after 3 strokes.  So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as 
I can remember to do/use.





On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote:

Tom,

I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 
on three machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so 
far. No issues installing or using it. The bug that made some 
functions in Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!!


*Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:*
Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop.
Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you 
the folder LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb

Run the following terminal commands to install it:
1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.*
2. sudo dpkg -i 
~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb
3. sudo dpkg -i 
~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb
4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the 
different components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/11/2013 01:43 PM, Marc Paré wrote:

Le 2013-02-11 12:50, Don C. Myers a écrit :

Hi All,

A simple copy and paste works really well!! No typing necessary.
Just make sure you have the file saved as a .txt that you open with 
GEdit.


When I was new to Linux (Ubuntu) and didn't understand anything about
what the system was really doing or about the file structure, OpenOffice
was updated, and it wasn't going to be included for Ubuntu users until
the next update, which was three or 4 months down the road. I ran across
this method as a way to update my OpenOffice without waiting. The same
thing took place with the next OpenOffice release. Again I found the
updated instructions on the Internet. I still use this as it is easy to
update computers. I've installed Ubuntu on about 23 or so. It is also
easy for a new person to Ubuntu since they don't have to understand
changing directories, etc. Simple extract the download to the desktop,
and then copy and paste the three commands into the terminal.

Don



This I also agree with as well. If the scripts fit for everyone. 
However, there is no sense making installing LibreOffice (the 
downloaded files) sound so complicated for Linux. You don't really 
need to know much about installing .deb's or .rpm's other than to 
right-click and the files and picking the right choices. That's all.


In fact, if you are just installing one .deb or .rpm, on most systems, 
you just have to double-click on the .deb or .rpm file and it will 
call up the distro's installer. It's just that simple. Just like it is 
done on Windows.


Cheers,

Marc


The only reason you cannot double click any of the .deb files in the 
install's DEBS folder is the fact that you need to make sure they are 
all run due to the file dependency issues.  They have to be run in a 
certain order, sort of.


It would be nice to have a double-click script that could be run that 
way that will run all of the .deb file in the folder, but it is not as 
easy as that, or that single double-clicking file/script might have been 
created by now.


So far, needing the terminal to install packages [not all] is a problem 
for some users who want to switch from Windows.  Also, sometimes the 
double-clicked package installs do not even make a menu or desktop 
launcher icon, so you have to go into the bin or other folder and 
create your own launcher icon.  I had to do that for the Canon Scanning 
package.  It was /usr/bin/scangearmp and how many new users to Linux 
would know how to create a launcher or where the command was stored?


More people might move over to Linux if package were easier to install 
on Ubuntu, Mint, and others.  We all got spoiled on doing a double-click 
on the install file [.exe or .msi] and it will place the package icon in 
the menu system [Start] and place a launch icon on the desktop for ease 
of use.  Yes, we got spoiled, but it was easier.  I do not know how to 
add the Canon Scan Gear package to the Ubuntu Applications menu.  Wish I 
did.





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/11/2013 05:59 PM, Marc Paré wrote:

Hi Tim,

Le 2013-02-11 14:04, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit :

So far, needing the terminal to install packages [not all] is a problem
for some users who want to switch from Windows.  Also, sometimes the
double-clicked package installs do not even make a menu or desktop
launcher icon, so you have to go into the bin or other folder and
create your own launcher icon.  I had to do that for the Canon Scanning
package.  It was /usr/bin/scangearmp and how many new users to Linux
would know how to create a launcher or where the command was stored?


Not sure about the other deb software, but we do supply this in our 
packages, it's in the main packagage-desktop integration 
-libreoffice4.0-freedesktop-menus-4.0.0-103.noarch. I am not sure if 
the Ubuntu's Unity adheres to the standard, but Gnome and KDE do.


As for getting it on your desktop, grab it and drop on your desktop, 
you normally get prompted if you want a copy, link.


Cheers,

Marc


The one that is in Ubuntu is named - 
libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb


This is the menu guide I think for Debian desktop-integration.

?package(libreoffice-writer):needs=X11 section=Apps/Editors\
  title=LibreOffice 4.0 Writer command=libreoffice4.0 -writer\
  hints=Word Processors\
  kderemove=y\
icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png\
icon16x16=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/libreoffice4.0-writer.png


This is for the RPM version you have.  There are 3 different ones in the 
RPM desktop-integration package.


?package(libreoffice4.0-writer): needs=x11 
section=Office/Wordprocessors icon=libreoffice4.0-writer.png 
title=LibreOffice 4.0 Writer longtitle=LibreOffice 4.0 Word 
Processing Component command=libreoffice4.0 -writer 
mimetypes=application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-template,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-web,application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-master,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer.template,application/vnd.sun.xml.writer.global,application/vnd.stardivision.writer,application/msword,application/vnd.ms-word,application/x-doc,application/rtf 
kde_opt=InitialPreference=100 startup_notify=true









The problem is not getting it on my desktop or panel, but to get a 
listing in the Applications menu when the package does not list the 
package in say Applications/Office where it should be listed, but 
not.  I know how to make a launcher icon on the desktop for my Canon 
Scanner package, but not how to get it in the /Office menu or the 
/Graphics menu where it should belong.  The Canon scanning system will 
not work with XSane, like my Epson scanner does [since I went to Ubuntu 
12.04/12.10].





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/11/2013 06:14 PM, Marc Paré wrote:

Le 2013-02-11 17:01, Dan Lewis a écrit :


All well and good, but the simple way that you suggest will present
problems for the newcomer on Debian OS's. The desktop-integration file
will not install if the LO that came with the OS install CD remains: it
must be removed. Without doing this, you can not right click on a file
and select a LO version to open the file.



We used to use Synaptic to remove an installed program or install a
program from the Ubuntu repositories. A few years ago Ubuntu no longer
included this package manager when it went to using the Unity desktop.
(Synaptic was a part of the gnome desktop package.) In its place, Ubuntu
introduced the Ubuntu Software Center. It appears that programs can also
be removed using it, but only if they came from the Ubuntu repositories.
Right now I have LO 3.6.5.2 and 4.0.0.3 installed from the website.
Neither of these are listed in Ubuntu Software Center, so it can not be
used to remove them.



I just checked out your first paragraph. What you wrote does not work
for installing LO in Ubuntu. (It probably will not work for any of the
Debian OS's, but I only have Ubuntu and can not check the others.) The
only thing that works is to think about the specific steps that must be
followed and determine how to do them either on the command line or
using a script. You may want to call these convoluted, but at least they
work.

--Dan



Thanks for the information Dan. I will install Ubuntu on a spare box 
and test these out. I for one am for simplifying the notes on the .rpm 
section and adding a more simplified intallation routine of the 4 
steps which do work for users who install the most used default 
managers as Gnome or KDE managers.


We should also try to find a visual installation routine for our 
Ubuntu users. The vast majority of users are just interested in using 
the software. Is some wish to install the latest and the bleeding edge 
versions, we need to make it an easy install.


We are looking for more contributors in all of our teams and 
especially QA. IMO, we should try to get our betas/rc's into the hands 
of users interested in QA who actually use LibreOffice in a productive 
way. The installation barrier should not become such a burden that 
such users would cringe at the very thought of installing these 
pre-release versions. When doing QA, users are often installing newer 
version of LibreOffice in a very short order of time.


Cheers,

Marc





I think we need to make it as easy as possible for our users [ 
Windows/Mac/Linux ] to install the newest version of LO to replace the 
older ones.


I really think it is not Windows vs. Linux, but how we can make it easy 
for all users, no matter what OS they use.  MS has an installer build 
into the .msi package.  We need to do something like that for Linux.


HP has a package like sh hplip-3.11.3a.run that is run in the terminal 
that walks you through the install process for the Linux printing.


There are a lot of complex things going on, including a make option in 
there.  How easy would it be to create something like that?








--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Tom
I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it.


On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried
installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice
from the command-line by typing in

libreoffice

I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because i was 
missing a package called something like


libreoffice-common

when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop integration
folders i found there was one!  I'm sure it's been there in previous
releases?!  However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything
then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it.


So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try that odd
way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried unless i 
wanted to try to collect error reports and stuff (ie never).

Regards from
Tom :)



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Installing the Deb

2013-02-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P



I do not like all that typing.

What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived 
file and unarchive it.  Then I take the folder that is created and 
rename it to Lib or LibO.  That way you do not need to type all of the 
characters of the folder's name.  I also do not use the desktop as the 
storage place fore the unarchived folder[s].


I keep forgetting the remove command so I use the package manager to 
remove the LO packages from the previous version that was installed.  
Works well for me.


Also, I tend to use the cd command to go to the proper folder[s] where 
the dpkg command is needed.  Long ago, in my mainframe days, I was 
taught to go to the folder[s] where my files are to run them.  That is 
what I try to do.  The only time I do not is when I have a launcher icon 
to work with on my desktop.  I prefer to use the GUI more than the 
terminal anyways.  Easier on my fingers and my typing skills after 3 
strokes.  So I do things as easy as I can, or easy as I can remember to 
do/use.





On 02/10/2013 01:06 PM, Don Myers wrote:

Tom,

I used the following instructions to upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on 
three machines with Ubuntu 12.10. It has worked really well so far. No 
issues installing or using it. The bug that made some functions in 
Base run unacceptably slow have been fixed!!!


*Instructions for the 64 Bit Debian Version:*
Download LibreOffice_4.0.0.3 to the desktop.
Right click on it and extract it to the desktop. This will give you 
the folder LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb

Run the following terminal commands to install it:
1. sudo apt-get remove libreoffice*.*
2. sudo dpkg -i ~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/*.deb
3. sudo dpkg -i 
~/Desktop/LibreOffice_4.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb/DEBS/desktop-integration/libreoffice4.0-debian-menus_4.0.0-103_all.deb
4. If using Unity, Open Dash, type Libre and you will see the 
different components (Writer, Calc, etc.). Simply drag the icons for 
them over to where you wish to have them in the launcher bar.


If you install it in this manner using the official Document 
Foundation version, and you type libreoffice in the command line, I 
get the following:
The program 'libreoffice' is currently not installed. You can install 
it by typing:

sudo apt-get install libreoffice-common
An install as shown above does not have any repository from which it 
originated. Therefore there aren't any updates, which I understand. If 
it showed up as an installed program, Ubuntu would try to update the 
LibreOffice with its own version which would lead to a royal 
mess!! I did not get a message saying there is a missing package 
like you did.


Don


On 02/10/2013 09:59 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


Tom
I ram the install on Linux Mint 14 and had no troubles with it.


On 02/09/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I downloaded the .Deb for Ubuntu (and others) twice yday and tried
installing it as per instructions but when i tried running LibreOffice
from the command-line by typing in

libreoffice

I got an error message saying that LibreOffice couldn't run because 
i was missing a package called something like



libreoffice-common

when i looked through all the packages in the Deb and desktop 
integration

folders i found there was one!  I'm sure it's been there in previous
releases?!  However when i double-click on a docX or odt or anything
then LibreOffice 4 does successfully open it.


So, it's a bit weird but doesn't seem to be problem unless i try 
that odd
way of opening LO in a way that i would never normally have tried 
unless i wanted to try to collect error reports and stuff (ie never).


Regards from
Tom :)








--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

2013-02-08 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote:

On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:

On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com 
wrote:

Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the
LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a 
more
common font used by publishing houses.  I would look into changing 
the

fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are
dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use.

Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and 
serif

styles?


Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows,
MacOSX, and Linux OS installs?  Or are you asking if there is a font 
set

that can be installed on them?


Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents in the
other systems.


The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have
installedon there.  If you want your document to work on their systems,
with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their 
documents.



Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document could
be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged.

AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available for 
both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac.




There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be installed on 
Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not worry about an 
equivalents.  The key would be dealing with fonts that are already 
installed by others, so they do not need to install a new one.


Here is a free site
http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/
They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats.

So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used for 
Windows, Linux, and MacOSX.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

2013-02-08 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P




 Original Message 
Subject:Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:52 +0100
From:   Claude Fiefel claude.fie...@orange.fr
To: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com



un conseil prenez donc un traducteur en français for me finish libre 
office ok
Le 8 févr. 2013 à 14:53, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com a écrit :



On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com 
mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:

On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com 
mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:

Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the
LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a 
more
common font used by publishing houses.  I would look into 
changing the

fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If you are
dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use.

Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and 
serif

styles?


Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows,
MacOSX, and Linux OS installs?  Or are you asking if there is a 
font set

that can be installed on them?


Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents in the
other systems.


The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have
installedon there.  If you want your document to work on their systems,
with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their 
documents.



Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document could
be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged.

AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available for 
both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac.




There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be installed 
on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not worry about an 
equivalents.  The key would be dealing with fonts that are already 
installed by others, so they do not need to install a new one.


Here is a free site
http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/
They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats.

So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used for 
Windows, Linux, and MacOSX.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: 
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org 
mailto:users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

2013-02-08 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


The French email to me was the second emain [different addresses] that 
had the tag like that looked like they used an iPad to send it.
It decided to forward it to the list so someone who might know what 
should be done with the emails.




On 02/08/2013 10:02 AM, sun shine wrote:

On 08/02/13 14:54, Tom Davies wrote:

HI :)
The French website is here
http://fr.libreoffice.org/
and their wiki is here
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page/fr

but i don't understand enough to find the equivalent of this page
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Regards from
Tom :)








From: Dries Feys dries.f...@tvh.com
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com; LibreO - 
Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org

Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 14:42
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

I'm willing to take contact with him.

Can anyone give me the links to the french lists  unsubscribe info?

Met vriendelijke groeten, Salutations distinguées, Kind Regards,

DRIES FEYS
CORPORATE SERVICES • Specialist Software Developer



On 8 February 2013 15:40, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Hi :)
I am not sure what the French chap was saying.  Anyone know?  Can 
anyone help?


The problem for me is trying to guess which fonts other people have 
on their machines.  I carefully installed the font called Ubuntu 
and it's derivatives (bold, and so on) on all my colleagues 
machine's and my various bosses.  So it's ok for use inside our 
offices and for printing but when i need to send it outside it gets 
tricky.  So i generally stick to the MS fonts that 'everyone' has 
for documents that are going out.



It would be nice to have a slightly nicer version of some of them 
and the screen-fonts used in Xp and Win7 but although Tim at 
Kracked Press has tried to help me i still find it a bit of a pain 
as i have to walk around and install on each separate machine.  
There must be some faster route but i don't know it yet.



Regards from

Tom :)








From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: LibreO - Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 14:23
Subject: Fwd: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning




 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:56:52 +0100
From: Claude Fiefel claude.fie...@orange.fr
To: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com



un conseil prenez donc un traducteur en français for me finish 
libre office ok



Le 8 févr. 2013 à 14:53, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com a 
écrit :



On 02/08/2013 01:26 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 02/08/2013 01:06 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 07/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com 
mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:

On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com 
mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside 
of the
LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look 
into a more
common font used by publishing houses.  I would look into 
changing the
fonts used and see which one works best for your needs. If 
you are

dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use.

Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans 
serif and serif

styles?

Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most 
Windows,
MacOSX, and Linux OS installs?  Or are you asking if there is 
a font set

that can be installed on them?

Ideally yes, otherwise a font in gnu/linux that has equivalents 
in the

other systems.


The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have
installedon there.  If you want your document to work on their 
systems,
with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their 
documents.


Understood for pdf, but for odf it would be nice if a document 
could

be distributed for editing and the font remained unchanged.

AFAIK Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman, and Courier are available 
for both Linux and Windows. I do not know the equivalents for Mac.


There are thousands of fonts that can be found that can be 
installed on Windows, Linux, and MacOSX, the exact font and not 
worry about an equivalents.  The key would be dealing with fonts 
that are already installed by others, so they do not need to 
install a new one.


Here is a free site
http://www.1001freefonts.com/ http://www.1001freefonts.com/
They show Windows and Mac downloads, but both are TTF font formats.

So if MacOSX used TTF fonts, then the same font file can be used 
for Windows, Linux, and MacOSX.





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: 
users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting

Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas

2013-02-08 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


There are a lot of persona[s] I have tried for Firefox that did not work 
for me.  Same will go for LO 4.0.0.


There is some easy instructions on the FF site to help people create 
your own persona[s].  I may be creating a version myself, specifically 
working for LO 4.0.0.  If I do, I will place it on the FF so if you 
search for LibreOffice, you will find it.


The hardest thing is deciding what you want the top menu bar to look 
like and doing the image editing.  After that it is a very simple 
process.  So simple, that there many thousands of them out there.



On 02/08/2013 10:23 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
The girl/lady reading the script has used LibreOffice a couple of times but 
really had no idea how to do the things she was reading about and still doesn't 
know.  To be fair neither do i but she has a nice voice so i might listen to it 
enough to work out what it's about.  It might even help me with my work as i 
use a CMS (one i find a bit of a pita tbh) quite frequently.

The main point is that if articles are promoting the CMIS thing then it would 
be sensible if they gave a link to further info about it and all i know is that 
video.  So, i am trying to give the link in the comments section in some of the 
articles Italo gave us links to.

It's interesting to hear about a 2minute rule.  I guessed at 3 minutes a couple 
of months ago so it's good to know i wasn't tooo far off.

Hopefully for that video, people watching will mostly be advanced users ready 
to commit to the full 5mins and the nice voice might help keep them focused.
Regards from
Tom :)








From: C. H. D. webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk
To: LibreOffice User Support Mailing List users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 15:04
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas

Hello!

I have just watched the video provided:

  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2bbnyAjMeMfeature=youtu.be


I think this video is tidy. (I have not used CMIS.) The voice is nice.


I think I have kept my video as short as about two minutes. I think people will 
not have the patience. (Most people I know do not have patience.)

I also feel that two minutes is the key. If a video is longer than that, then 
the process must be very long. Very serious users will spend more than two minutes on 
watching such a long video.

If I need to use CMIS tomorrow (being very nervous), I will need to know how to 
do it as soon as possible. I suggest giving the audience the most important 
steps first.


The link mentioned is for more advanced users, I believe.

Regards,
C. H. D.





_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _












寄件人︰ Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
收件人︰ C. H. D. webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk
傳送日期︰ 2013年02月8日 (週五) 1:03 PM
主題︰ Re: [libreoffice-users] How-to video of using Firefox Personas


Hi :)
Nicely done :)  Have you sent it to the documentation mailing list?  They might 
be interested in putting it on their page of video tutorials.

Btw have you seen this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2bbnyAjMeMfeature=youtu.be
that uses an unusual sound-track and a minimalist voice to help keep people's 
attention?

I've seen a lot of YouTube HowTos that have sound-tracks that quickly get very 
out-dated by choosing music that is very fashionable but that lacks class.  I 
don't like the particular piece of music in that link i just gave but i do like 
the way that it's unusual enough that people are unlikely to have heard it 
before and certainly not enough to get tired of it.

Also a lot of times videos have constant chatter going on, often without really 
adding
adding anything useful.  Lots of umm and ahh and Here you can see that i am doing 
or As you can see.  The constant flow of words makes it difficult to translate and yet keep the timings 
good.

What i really liked about the voice in the link i gave was that the speaking 
parts were short and distinct so that when it was translated from Danish into 
English the chap was able to chop up Pamela's voice and place the comments in 
exactly the right places.  So, Pamela only had to leave decent pauses between 
statements.  She didn't have to get the pauses exactly right because Leif was 
going to chop up the voice-audio and place the parts appropriately to fit the 
video and the music.

I think the only thing missing is an srt file under the video so that people 
could download the srt and the video in order to see the  subtitles.  
Alternatively just some way people could get the script in some other text
format.  Either way something for blind users to be able to get through their 
screen-readers.

Anyway i really just wondered what you thought of the link.  Have you done a 
lot of these sorts of things?  Yours looked like you knew what you were doing.  
If you do write a script i might be able to get Pamela or another lady to read 
it for you as long as the script was quite short and 

Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

2013-02-07 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/07/2013 01:37 AM, e-letter wrote:

On 05/02/2013, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:

Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the
LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more
common font used by publishing houses.  I would look into changing the
fonts used and see which one works best for your needs.  If you are
dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use.


Is there a cross-platform font available, in both sans serif and serif styles?



Are you asking if there is one font that is installed on most Windows, 
MacOSX, and Linux OS installs?  Or are you asking if there is a font set 
that can be installed on them?


If the first, then not likely, since Windows changes it default 
installed fonts for every version and last I knew MAC did not have the 
same font names as Windows.


Not if you want to install a font on Windows, MacOSX, and Linux, well 
that is different.  I do not know if MacOSX will install TTF fonts, or 
OTF type, but I know that there are font sites where you can find fonts 
listing both MAC and Windows versions.  Linux should be able to install 
TTF and OTF fonts like Windows, at least my Ubuntu/Linux does.


So, all you have to do is find a font that works on MAC and Windows, and 
it should work for Linux.  Then you just install them on all three 
platforms.


Well, that said, there is a harder way.
Go through all of the documentation on which fonts are installed with 
which versions of Windows and MAC. Then look at  chart that list which 
fonts on MAC are the same as the ones on Windows, but have different 
names of the MAC system.  Then go from there.


I do not have MAC, but I have a core set of fonts that I make sure are 
installed on my Windows andLinux systems.


THEN, if I need to send documents out to others, I embed the fonts in 
those documents. Most PDF printer drivers, like CUPS-PDF [Linux] and 
doPDF [Windows] will embed the fonts used into the file so the viewer of 
the document will see it the way you wanted it to be.


The problem really is not with your systems, but what others have 
installedon there.  If you want your document to work on their systems, 
with the same font and such, you must embed the fonts in their documents.


LO, well their PDF exportation system was working on embedding all the 
fonts, instead of just some.  I do not know how far along it is but it 
is not the easiest thing to do.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 4.0 Unity Integration in Ubuntu 12.04

2013-02-07 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/07/2013 10:59 AM, Paddy Landau wrote:

Jay Lozier wrote

Paddy Landau wrote

According to the  New Features page ... Unity Integration is built in.

Sadly, this is not working for me.

Did you install LO manually? ... cd desktop-integration ...

The installation process is now completed, and you should have icons for
all the LibreOffice applications in your desktop's Applications/Office
menu.

Thank you for your reply, but this was not what I was referring to. I was
referring to the Unity menu-bar integration.

If you look at the  New Features page
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/4-0-new-features-and-fixes  , about
halfway down (under the title GUI), you will see a screen-shot of the
Unity Integration.

Since my last posting, I have been informed that perhaps it may not work in
Ubuntu versions prior to the current Alpha version (13.04), so perhaps it
will not work in 12.04?


There has been a lot of updates lately for 12.04, even some Unity ones.  
I run MATE instead of Unity.  Maybe 12.10 works better.  I am running it 
on my testing laptop [but with MATE as well], but run 12.04/MATE for my 
default desktop system.


I do see the Unity Integration box you are referring to.  My question 
seem to be what it the current state of the Unity Integration for the 
12.04/12.10 versions.  How much has been changed between 3.6.5 and 4.0.0 
that affected the integration, other than the addition of persona to 
the UI?


I wonder why the integration will not work with 12.xx since that it the 
current version of Ubuntu?  It what you was given was true, why would 
they work on doing the work on the OS version that is not even out?  
Does not make sense. I waited a long time before I went from 10.04 LTS 
to 12.04LTS, just before 12.10 came out.  So if the next LTS is 
14.04LTS, then there will be a lot of Ubuntu users [Unity or others] 
that will be still using 12.xx for another year or so.  Now work for 
12.xx, does not make sense.  It needs to work and not make you wait 
till 13.04 or later.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 4.0 Unity Integration in Ubuntu 12.04

2013-02-07 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Why not make sure that the version of LO work for the current 
Long-Term-Support version of Ubuntu Unity?  I do not use Unity, since I 
do not like it.  But There will be a lot of Unity users who will want LO 
to work with their 12.04LTS version till the next LTS comes out.  I did 
not use 11.04/11.10 but waited till 12.04LTS.


Is there any way to make sure that LO works with 12.04LTS, 12.10, 13.04, 
and then 13.10?


Right now, articles state Mint Linux [MATE or Cinnamon] is more popular 
than Ubuntu/Unity [and the other desktop environments for it].  But if 
we turn off some of our Linux users, then where will it stop after 
that?  I use Ubuntu, but I hate Unity so I do not use it.  BUT, many 
people love Unity and those people are most likely LO users and really 
would be upset if the specific Unity menu system will not work with LO.



On 02/07/2013 01:40 PM, Paddy Landau wrote:

krackedpress wrote

… How much has been changed between 3.6.5 and 4.0.0 that affected the
integration, other than the addition of persona to the UI?
…
I wonder why the integration will not work with 12.xx since that it the
current version of Ubuntu?
…
why would they work on doing the work on the OS version that is not even
out?

Good questions, and I think I know the answers. Canonical tends to freeze
applications for a specific version, releasing updated versions only if
needed for security. Firefox, Chromium and Thunderbird are the only
exceptions due to their unusual release mechanisms.

I believe that there have been large changes to the core code of Unity
between 12.04 and 12.10, and further changes to 13.04. So, that could
explain it: Canonical created package lo-menubar for Unity, but it works
(badly) only on LibreOffice 3.5 if I remember correctly. It does not work on
later versions, and indeed conflicts with them.


krackedpress wrote

So if the next LTS is 14.04LTS, then there will be a lot of Ubuntu users
[Unity or others] that will be still using 12.xx for another year or so.
Now work for 12.xx, does not make sense.  It needs to work and not make
you wait till 13.04 or later.

Well, that's Canonical's way. You can either upgrade every six months to a
new Ubuntu version, or stick with the LTS. The structure is there to cater
for the home users who like to keep up-to-date (non-LTS) and the business
and corporate users who prefer longer-term stability (LTS). I tend to stick
with the LTS for stability, but because I use Libre Office extensively, I
prefer to keep Libre Office updated especially when earlier versions have
bugs.

Conclusion:

Given all the comments that have been given on this thread (and some more
that I received off-list), I believe we can conclude that it won't work
before 13.04.

I'll just have to wait for 14.04 before using the Unity Integration.
Fortunately, it is not a big deal. We can live with it.

Thank you everyone for your responses — they have been helpful.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-4-0-Unity-Integration-in-Ubuntu-12-04-tp4035137p4035233.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

2013-02-05 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Since 'liberation serif' is a font that most people outside of the 
LO/Linux world would not be using, I think you should look into a more 
common font used by publishing houses.  I would look into changing the 
fonts used and see which one works best for your needs.  If you are 
dealing with a publisher, ask which fonts they use.


I am a font guy, or use to be.  I have collected over 14 GB of font 
files, but I have a core set of fonts that I place on every system that 
I own.  These are the ones I use the most over the years.


Right now, I am reading a hard cover book that has a different font than 
the paper-back font of the previous version in that series.  The 
kerneling and line spacing is much different than the paperback books.  
So, with that in mind, you will need to know what the publication will 
look like and use the best font that works for it.  If a publisher uses 
a specific set of fonts, use them.  If not, then it is up to you to 
choose the best font for the document.  I sometimes take a paragraph and 
repeat it over and over again and then make each paragraph a different 
font.  I then take it to friends who help me decide which font works the 
best for them.  After that, I take the final choices and make 2-3 page 
examples of the text with those fonts at the size and page format that 
the document will be published.  Then which one is best, I use.


Professionals tend to do something like this and then stick with a small 
core of fonts that work the best for their publications and their 
different page size.


Since each proportional font is a little different and their kerneling 
aspect seems to be different from others, you mush go through some 
process to select the best font for your documents. There are thousands 
of fonts that look like Times Roman, each just a little different.  Once 
you find and test the fonts, you then keep the best ones for your work.  
The hard part is the testing of each of them to get the best ones.  That 
is why I suggested asking the publisher[s], if possible, which font[s] 
they prefer to use, since they would have done such visual font tests 
before and chosen the best ones.



On 02/05/2013 04:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I think LaTeX is far more sophisticated for proper professional printing.  My 
guess would be that commercial publishing houses convert from Writer or Word 
into LaTeX (or something) and then perhaps reapply formatting.  Kerning is the 
least of the problems when you look at a document created in Word.  Even 
so-called Desktop Publishing tools such as Publisher tend to mangle things 
quite badly.  The quality of documents created with Writer is far far higher 
but it's still unlikely to compete with proper DTP tools such as LaTeX.

As a work-around it might be worth trying out a few different fonts and see 
which bothers you the least.  Most people don't notice the other prolific 
problems created by MSO, let alone kerning or other spacing issues.

It is always possible that someone on this list has some clever way of dealing with 
kerning or even avoiding it.  I have a feeling there is a way so poking around in the 
Format menu might be useful.  So, i really am hoping we do get a better 
answer here
Regards from
Tom :)







From: e-letter inp...@gmail.com
To: users users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 8:13
Subject: [libreoffice-users] character kerning

Readers,

The classic text 'lorem ipsum...' shows how kerning of characters in
writer is poor (compared to LaTeX anyway):

Lorem ipsum dolor sit _amet_, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad
_minim_ _veniam_, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut
aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in
reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla
pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in
culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

If the text above is copied into writer, for a font such as
'liberation serif', examples of poor character kerning are indicated
by the underscore (_) character.

Any way to improve this?

--
LO35413

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0

2013-02-05 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Many months ago, there was a notification that MSO2013 changed their XML 
formatting from a loose to a strict version of the format.  I do not 
remember the exact wording but they stated that MSO2010 may not read 
MSO2013 files correctly.  So that makes 3 releases of MSO on Windows 
that are not compatible with MS's own XML based formats.  EVERY time 
they release a new version, since 2007, they require the user to buy the 
new version to be compatible.  They there is the big hike in buying 
their office suite, since renting will give MS more income from the same 
user. You get a lower up-front cost but a higher total cost when you 
rent MSO.  All this incompatibility is just a scheme to increase their 
income.


As for rendering differences between different versions of Windows, XP 
through Win7, yes MS admits that as well.  Between different font 
bundles and differences in how the OS does it rendering, I do not know 
what the differences are, but I have seen the differences myself 
sometimes.  I ran XP/pro and Vista.  Now I have XP/pro and Win7/pro.  
Yes, sometimes documents look a little different between the two MS 
OSs.  Since I use Ubuntu/Linux for my main desktop, and I have not 
bought a MSO package since 2003, I rarely have to deal with working with 
MSO myself, which I enjoy.



On 02/05/2013 09:10 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Only MS Office 2007 and 2010 are available on Mac.  They are re-named as 2008 
and 2011 but basically are pretty much the same.  However there are 
compatibility issues with documents produced on one platform and then viewed on 
the other.  Documents produced with 2007 don't always look at all right on 2010 
let alone 2011.  If produced in 2010 on Win Xp then even MS admits they wont 
look right on 2010 on Win7, nor Win8.  Their idea of 'compatibility' is that 
everyone must be using the same version on the same OS.

Also while a student may not be considered to need various different parts of 
MSO it is still often claimed that moving away from MSO might be a bad idea for 
them because it means doing without those apps that are not even included in 
their version of MSO.  Then there are tons of other bundles that each lack 
different parts of the whole suite.  Again the missing parts are used as 
reasons why people can't migrate away from MSO.

I have just been helping 2 students on courses that are allegedly trying to 
teach about computers and the Access module parts were particularly tricky as 
they didn't have Access at home despite having bought the version of MSO that 
the colleges recommended.  So many different bundles = so much confusion.

Rtf is no longer being actively developed.  Also,  as is typical of MS formats, 
it fails to be compatible between different programs or even same programs on 
different OSes, let alone different platforms.  I've never yet met any office 
worker using Biff.

Almost all serious servers run non-MS platforms.  Somewhere around 1%.  Mostly 
it's small company servers but again they tend to go with unix-based platforms 
because of security issues.

Mobile devices seem to almost entirely run non-MS.  The Slate's sales have been 
appallingly lower than estimated.  The only person i know of that has run a 
Windows phone found it started crashing after just 2 weeks and at best is 
suffering slowdowns already.

All the 3rd party tools for reading documents that are in MS formats  tend to 
be better at displaying LibreOffice documents because it's usually their native 
format too.
Regards from
Tom :)







From: Urmas davian...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 14:07
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0

Tom Davies:

On the other hand MS Office still does not support many features of LibreOffice 
yet either.

Like custom toolbar backgrounds? I think people can live without those.


For example the Student's version of MSO doesn't include Publisher or Access.

Why does a student need Publisher? Why does they need Access when they can have 
the real SQL server for free?


   Plus their default formats ... only really work on desktop machines.

Both BIFF and RTF are trivially parsed and can be used on servers as well.


Will MSO ever catch up on security or cross-platform compatibility?

There are third-party solutions which handle Office documents on mobile 
devices. The two only desktop platforms, Windows and MacOSX are both using MSO. 
What compatibility?


-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 

Re: [libreoffice-users] spelling + grammar checker in writer

2013-02-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I believe there has been some work on the Spell Checking system since 
then, but I could be wrong.  I use to use the OOo extension that changed 
to a different system, but I stopped doing that in the 3.5.x series/line.


To be honest, you might see some improvements with the 3.6.5 version of 
the Debian installs.


There are some items in the ToolsOptions section about how and what is 
used for the spell checking.  You might want to play around with those 
settings to see if things improve for you. Words with numbers and 
Capitals lettering are listed there in the options for spell checking.  
Depending on what is installed on your system, the options may be 
different than mine.


I came from OOo 1.x era for my first non-MSO package since I switch to 
MSO-95.  I started using LO with its first offering.


- -

Your description of the killing of manual formatting is something I 
have never seen.  You are saying that you have formatted words in things 
like Bold, Italic, and other text and paragraph formatting styles, and 
the spell checking system is changing them as its works?


Weird.  I would be upset as well.

Since 3.5.3 is old for a LO version, maybe you should download and 
install the 3.6.5 Debian version of LO from the web pages.  If the 
problem still is there than it is a matter for the developers need to 
deal with through the bug process.


Sometimes the renaming of the .libreoffice hidden folder will help, 
since it resets the user profile, which sometimes gets messed up and 
caused some weird errors.  Sometimes weird printer errors are caused 
by the profile being corrupted in some manner.  Sometimes checking or 
unchecking options in the ToolsOptions menus might fix the issue.  It 
did for a weird duplex problem for some printers.


Since the issue you are having has been with the OOo/LO projects for 
that long, you might want to make a list of all of the extensions and 
add-ons you are using and then including that with a bug report to the 
devs.  As I stated, I use to use a OOo extension that worked with the 
spell checking system and modified it for more options than OOo and LO 
had in those early days.  Now I do not.


I really hope the developers, via the bug reporting system, can help you.




On 02/04/2013 01:58 AM, Walther Koehler wrote:

Am Samstag, 2. Februar 2013 schrieb webmaster-Kracked_P_P:

On 02/02/2013 07:30 AM, Walther Koehler wrote:

Hello web-m, hello list,

Thank you for your reply.

I am using / have been using different Linux Debian Versions and OO from 2.*
on up to LO 3.5.3 and I have seen no different behaviour in the grammar and
spelling checker.

If I insert/delete a letter outside the red marking, the next word to be
corrected ist only partially marked red. i.e.
cONFUXION (capitals = red marked)
LO might offer as a better replacement confusion, clicking on change gives
cconfusion

A paragraph might be formatted as standard. Some words are in addition hard
formatted as bold. As soon as I do some manual correction outside the
red-marked words, the checker starts over checking that paragraph an killing
all hard formats.


Walther


Hi folks,

I am using the spelling and grammar checker quite often. However, there
are some nasty drawbacks (in all versions of OO and LO I know):

- any manual correction outside the (red marked) word will result in
either reevaluation of the whole paragraph, loss of hard formats in that
paragraph and/or a shift in the red mark of the follwing words to be
corrected. This means, the red formatted text might cover only part of
the word to be corrected. Thus, correction will fail.

Yours

Walther

I have not i\encountered this partial covering of the word with the
red markings.

Please tell up which version of LibreOffice you are using and what is
you Operating System.

The correction that fails - do you mean the failure of the spell
checking system to correctly pick up the word, or are you talking about
failure to pick up the grammar issues?

Loss of hard formatting in the paragraph?  could you give an example
please.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggests

2013-02-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/03/2013 07:58 AM, Roberta wrote:

Can you make libreoffice's interface more similar to the office 2013 one's?
Another thing... why doesn't artwork work on writer???



If LO gets too similar to MSO's user interface, then MS could take TDF 
to court for infringements to their look and feel of their office 
packages.  Their pocked change is in the millions of dollars for legal 
fees to push any company away from looking too much like what they do. 
MS and Apple have patented things like finger movements.  The pinch 
and page turning movements are patented by Apple so if they wanted, they 
could take EVERY tablet company to court to prevent them from using it.  
MS has patents like that. They could claim it and take a small company 
to court and break that company with legal fees.  MS has done that before.


SO
I do not want LO to look like MSO.  Actually I do not like MSO's ribbon 
look and feel.  I do not like MS Win8's tablet icon style of desktop, 
just like I do not like Unity's look and feel for Ubuntu [kept Ubuntu 
but switched to MATE d.e.].


The user interface designers did a lot of work to make it easy to use 
and to stay away from anything that might make a different office 
package company fee like we stoletheir designs.


---

The artwork on Writer? Are you talking about MSO's clipart system? 
Patented, I believe. If the individual clipart file are not working with 
Writer, well that is a different question all together. Give us an 
example of the file mime type [.jpg, .png, .pic, .gif, .tif, and others]


https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/CheatSheets
This is not finished, but on that page you will see a list of image file 
types that LO uses.  Many of the older file types are no longer used my 
most of the market.  I have some old Corel Draw clipart that I am 
converting over to other formats soLO, GIMP, and other image working 
package can deal with them.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] spelling + grammar checker in writer

2013-02-02 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/02/2013 07:30 AM, Walther Koehler wrote:

Hi folks,

I am using the spelling and grammar checker quite often. However, there are
some nasty drawbacks (in all versions of OO and LO I know):

- any manual correction outside the (red marked) word will result in either
reevaluation of the whole paragraph, loss of hard formats in that paragraph
and/or a shift in the red mark of the follwing words to be corrected. This
means, the red formatted text might cover only part of the word to be
corrected. Thus, correction will fail.

Yours

Walther



I have not i\encountered this partial covering of the word with the 
red markings.


Please tell up which version of LibreOffice you are using and what is 
you Operating System.


The correction that fails - do you mean the failure of the spell 
checking system to correctly pick up the word, or are you talking about 
failure to pick up the grammar issues?


Loss of hard formatting in the paragraph?  could you give an example 
please.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-02 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/02/2013 01:01 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:

Bug  fdo#60177 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60177
resolved as invalid after successful installation and printer function.

Anyone experiencing similar printer configuration issue on LibreOffice for
Windows upgrade to 4.0.0.3 RC3, i.e. Print dialogs show no printers, please
capture installation log and user profile and reopen this bug to post them.

Stuart



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4034001.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Maybe you should let people know how to capture that log.  If I know how 
to do it, after I had the problem, I would have given it to the bug 
reporting process.


I have been installing LO since its earliest days and no not know how to 
capture the log wile doing a normal install, not a command line 
install like I finally did to get it working.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-02 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Lets make it easier for people than dealing with a bug report process.

Make it a place where you will find info to save or get before you make 
a bug report.


I had to make an account to get into the bug reporting system. How many 
people do you want to do that and then search for answers?



On 02/02/2013 06:38 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I think
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
already has something about how to get an strace or something in Windows.  
Perhaps somewhere in that page would be good.
Regards from
Tom :)







From: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Saturday, 2 February 2013, 22:30
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW 
STOPPER

Tim,

Good idea. I'll poke around on the Wiki's and see if I can find a good spot
to insert it. Of course folks would then need to realize they'd need to look
in the Wiki to get the information on how to capture a log of the install if
they're having problems with a Windows installation.

Suspect it will go under the how-to submit a bug Wiki content.

Stuart



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4034029.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-01 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop.

It will not show anyprinters at all.  Claims there is noneis installed.

4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not.

This is a Show Stopper.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-01 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/01/2013 03:44 PM, Joel Madero wrote:




On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P 
webmas...@krackedpress.com mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:



I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop.

It will not show anyprinters at all.  Claims there is noneis
installed.

4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not.

This is a Show Stopper.


Crap, can you open a bug report on free desktop. Our QA team will 
investigate.



Best Regards,
Joel


--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com mailto:jmadero@gmail.com



Never opened a bug report before, if I remember correctly.

Do you want me to send you a screen clip of what it looks like off list?

I have not installed .3 on any Ubuntu systems yet, but will go back to 
.2 for Win7.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-01 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/01/2013 03:48 PM, Joel Madero wrote:






Never opened a bug report before, if I remember correctly.

Do you want me to send you a screen clip of what it looks like
off list?

I have not installed .3 on any Ubuntu systems yet, but will go
back to .2 for Win7.


I believe you ;) We just need a bug report so we can escalate this 
immediately.


https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/

BSA is pretty straight forward to report. You can send me a screenshot 
if you want, I'll take a look.



Best Regards,
Joel



--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com mailto:jmadero@gmail.com



Bug Reported
print dialog screen photo added

4.0.0.2 reinstalled over top of .3, needed to do the repair since it 
would not run after the initial install of .2 over .3.   After I did the 
repair 4.0.0.2 works fine and prints fine.  Whatever the bug is, it 
happened when during the .3 changes.


I have NOT, tried 4.0.0.3 or .2 on any other OS besides Win7 64-bit.
I only have
Win7 [64-bit], WinXP[32-bit],
Ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 64-bit and 10.04 32-bit.





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-01 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Well, I installed .2 back over .3 and the printers were there - same 
profile unless 4.0.0.2 resets the profile when installed.


Just installed .3 on a WinXP laptop.  Did not get the problem.

Got notice that is is not a show stopper, but major high, since it 
could not be duplicated.


Since you said it was already reported before I did today, then I must 
not be the only one that gets this error with Win7.



On 02/01/2013 05:27 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:

Its already been posted as fdo#60177

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60177





--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-0-0-3-has-no-printer-in-Win7-SHOW-STOPPER-tp4033793p4033822.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.0.0.3 has no printer in Win7 - SHOW STOPPER

2013-02-01 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 02/01/2013 07:09 PM, Dave Barton wrote:

webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

I just installed 4.0.0.3 on my Win7 laptop.

It will not show anyprinters at all.  Claims there is noneis installed.

4.0.0.2 does prints fine, but 4.0.0.3 does not.

This is a Show Stopper.


Just installed 4.0.0.3 over 4.0.0.2 on a Win 7 laptop and printing works
perfectly.



Sorry mine did not.
XP install over 3.6.4 worked fine though.
have gone back to .2 and will do a command line install in the morning 
[or so] and see about it then.


One thing though, my laptop told me I could not uninstall .3 since I was 
not the administrator, even though I did a clean install of Win7 and I 
am the only user account ever created on it.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 3.6.5 come out the same week as MSO 2013.

2013-01-29 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/29/2013 09:41 AM, Urmas wrote:
It is weird that a version of LO comes out the same week as the 
newest MSO after a 3 year wait between versions. I am glad 
LibreOffice does not make you wait 2 or 3 years between versions.


And I would be glad if LO ever obtain the feature parity with MSO 
2003. But apparently it requires actual work instead of bumping 
version numbers.





Although this thread, which I started is not for the MSO/LO debate, I 
will rebut you comment.  This debate will be better to have its own 
thread, like many others in the past about this same subject of parity 
of features.


The big issue I have with that statement is - if LibreOffice was to have 
the same features that MSO has, then it would be a massive bloated 
software. The figures I have been given is that 99% of MSO's features 
are used by less than 1% of its users.  Maybe one day LibreOffice will 
have an extended version with all of the features MSO has, but that is 
unlikely.


Well, LO could have these features. They could be done by the 
extensions idea.  That is what it was created for.  It gives 
developers the ability to create more functions for LO to be added as 
needed.  I have seen something in the lists that make me believe that 
the 4.0.x line will make it easier to add these extended functions to LO.


The original concept, IMHO, is that LibreOffice was never going to be a 
clone of MSO.  TDF did not want to push the developers to make LO have 
all of the functions that makes MSO a bloated and slower package to 
start up.  The last time I used MSO, it took almost 5 minutes to start 
up completely to the point where I could edit the text.  LibreOffice 
does this in a few seconds on the same system.  ALSO, if you have all of 
those functions, then you will need to deal with all of them when you do 
a big UI modification or other base code modification, to make sure it 
all works properly. That is one reason why MSO takes years between versions.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] a LibreOffice 4 article

2013-01-28 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P



LibreOffice 4.0: The big changes will be under the hood

Summary: There's a new major version of open-source LibreOffice office 
suite on its way, but developers, not end-users, will be the ones who 
will notice the real changes.

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols for Linux and Open Source | January 27, 
2013 -- 21:12 GMT (13:12 PST)



http://www.zdnet.com/libreoffice-4-0-the-big-changes-will-be-under-the-hood-710383/

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Drop Caps Character Style in Writer

2013-01-27 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/27/2013 02:07 PM, Kevin O'Brien wrote:
I was working on understanding Character Styles in Writer, and it 
seems mostly straightforward. But I noticed that the Drop Caps style 
does not seem to do anything at all. Is that a bug or am I 
misunderstanding something here?


Thanks,



What are you trying to do?

subscript of a smaller sized character or do the same with a full size 
character?


Uncheck the Automatic box next to the Raise/lower by box.

The full size character will lower the given persentage with the 
Subscript option checked.





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Drop Caps Character Style in Writer

2013-01-27 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/27/2013 03:35 PM, Brian Barker wrote:

At 14:07 27/01/2013 -0500, Kevin O'Brien wrote:
I was working on understanding Character Styles in Writer, and it 
seems mostly straightforward. But I noticed that the Drop Caps style 
does not seem to do anything at all. Is that a bug or am I 
misunderstanding something here?


I'm guessing here, but I think I can see its usefulness.  You set drop 
caps as a property of your paragraph or paragraph style, of course.  
You may not wish the dropped cap to have the same character style as 
the rest of the paragraph text.  So the Drop Caps tab of the Paragraph 
or Paragraph Style dialogue gives you the opportunity to select a 
separate character style to be applied to the dropped caps 
themselves.  I'm guessing that the Drop Caps character style is 
provided as a convenient style to use for this purpose: you can select 
it in the paragraph or paragraph style properties and then set the 
character properties that you want in the Drop Caps character style.


You could alternatively create your own character style(s), of 
course.  But that's true of all the predefined styles.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


I have seen this done with books. the take the first character of the 
first paragraph of a chapter and use a larger or different font style of 
character.  They have been doing this thing since the early days of 
printing.  Some people call this type of thing illumination or 
something like that.  Many times the that first character is in color or 
some really fancy font style [as we call it now].


There are some really interesting things that can be done with Writer 
and its font/text styling, but I know only a few of them.


Sometimes it is easier for me to do it with graphic images or changing 
the font, but sometimes it is harder that way.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Printing Envelopes

2013-01-25 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I use Ubuntu 12.04 and a HP Laserjet 2300dn

I have add three different drivers to test out for that printer.
Did the same for an Epson inkjet.

I have [my text name for description] the following drivers.  I do not 
remember which HP/Linux defaults to for this printer.


 HP Laserjet 2300 Foomatic Postscript
 HP Laserjet 2300 hpijs PL3
 HP Laserjet 2300 CUPS Gutenprint lsb3.2-v5.27

Each of these show different options in the printing dialogs.
Also each seems to have a different quality of printing of the sample 
test page with text and graphics.


I chose the CUPS Gutenprint, since it seems the best print quality and 
the better print options for this duplexing printer.


As for the Envelope, does your printer have an envelope tray?  Or do you 
use the manual tray that centers the paper from letter to postcard 
widths?  I have one HP printer that does not center the envelopes, and 
it uses an envelope feeder tray that is left justified to the printer 
face of the page.  My Epson also uses a left justified, but the Canon 
uses the centered.


I do think that the pstoraster is the issue though.  You need to find 
a better driver, either a newer one from HP or try the CUPS Gutenprint 
driver.  I have no idea what that pstoraster filter/driver could be.


Slackware is RPM, correct?  Also is 13.1 the newest?  Did the envelope 
printing work in 12.x or 11.x?


Every time Ubuntu's update manager system downloads and installs a new 
hplip, CUPS,  or other printer file/driver upgrade, I seem to need to 
delete and reinstall my printers.  They never seem to fully work 
properly after an automatic upgrade download/install. Sometimes I loose 
the connection to those network printers and it acts like they do not 
exist.


SO, long winded statement . . .
Please try downloading the newest hplip/driver installer script from the 
HP/Linux page.


http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html

http://www.openprinting.org/printer/HP/HP-LaserJet_5

Full List of HP printers
http://www.openprinting.org/printers/manufacturer/HP/




   NOTE:  Before I buy a new or re-manufactured printer, I first look
   for Ubuntu/Debian drivers and how much the ink/toner will cost me. 
   The non-OEM toner for this laser printer costs about $35 shipped

   when the HP's original one is over $120.  Had to look far and wide
   for the Canon inkjet printer.  Canon USA does not support or have
   Linux drivers, but Canon UK does.  The Epson inkjet has a driver in
   the OpenPrinting.org list[s]. The Canon ink costs $180+ for 2 full
   sets, while a good non-OEM 2 full sets cost about $35 with shipping
   included.  The Canon uses - Black, Big Black, Gray, Yellow, Magenta,
   Cyan.  The Epson uses - Black, Yellow, Magenta, Light Magenta, Cyan,
   Light Cyan.  So you see it is impo0rtant to find out how much it
   will cost a person to get the ink/toner.






On 01/24/2013 10:21 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:

Rich,
I am using CUPS with my HP Laserjet 8150DN and I have no trouble 
printing #10 envelopes in LO.  So, it is possible.
pstoraster is a printer driver that converts Postscript to rastor, 
the printer page.  That implies that you are not using the Laserjet's 
Postscript emulation (missing option?), which would not need the 
pstoraster conversion.  CUPS has several driver options to select 
from, such as Foomatic, Gutenprint, or in  my printer's case, a CUPS 
driver (HP Laserjet 8150 Series Postscript (en)). You may try adding 
the same printer as a different name using different drivers to 
experiment with.  I see on my Slackware 12.2 Linux CUPS that there are 
only Gutenprint or Foomatic drivers for the LJ5.  However, HP has 
produced more then one model 5 over the years, so I am not sure which 
one you have.  Here is a place I go for Linux printer information:


http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting
   http://www.openprinting.org/printers

When I select the HP Laserjet 5, the result says it works 
perfectly.  It also says you should be using the hplip (HP Linux 
Imaging and Printing) driver.

Hope this helps.
Girvin Herr



Rich Shepard wrote:
  Running LO-3.5.5.3 on Slackware-13.1. The envelope template was 
built for

a COM10 size envelope in 2003 using whatever version of OO.o was then
current. Worked fine then; hasn't since OO.o was supplanted by LO. 
Time to

fix this problem.

  The page size is set for a COM10 US business envelope. When I try 
printing
it (paper size is commercial 10 and paper orientation is landscape 
mode),
the HP LaserJet 5 sits with nothing to print. When I check the CUPS 
jobs tab

I see this error message: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstoraster failed.

  If I print to a disk file I can print the resulting .pdf to a 
letter size

page, but not to an envelope.

  Any thoughts on this?

Rich







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: calendar project - should i use writer or calc

2013-01-24 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I suggest that if you take the mini monthly date calendar and make them 
images, then it might be worth while to make a Writer template for 
Writer's text options over Calc.


I have printed out many calendars, both Calc based and Writer based, but 
if you are going to be making one for yourself, you will have to decide 
which one is easier for you.


Having cell, row, column, formatting options are easier to work with in 
Calc.  If you are going to fill out the calendar with a lot of text 
formatting options that are not in Calc, then you will need to use 
Writer.  If you are going to fill in info in the template for a 
e-calendar or daily schedule, and then print it out, that might change 
your decision.


I have seem a lot of calendar templates out there, daily, weekly, 
monthly, and yearly.  The big choice is how much space you need to fill 
in for scheduled events.


For a daily and weekly one, there are templates out there that are 
similar to the Day Planner style that you can buy at the office supply 
stores.  I mostly use a monthly calendar that I place on my 
refrigerator, a schedule text-window on my desktop, and a cheap weekly 
schedule book I bought at an office supply store that I carry around 
with me.



On 01/24/2013 12:22 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Generally i would agree with Dan, having seen the photos.  However i would 
normally try a Calendar program such as Google-calendar.  They wouldn't produce 
it exactly the same though.
Regards from
Tom :)







From: Dan Lewis elderdanle...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: martin.kas...@campus-24.com
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2013, 17:15
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: calendar project - should i use writer or 
calc

   Having viewed your links, I think the Writer would be a better
choice.

--Dan


On 01/24/2013 12:11 PM, anne-ology wrote:

  I think you meant to send this to the list,
  so am forwarding this on to them.

  As for me, I haven't a clue as to how to use the calc program  ;-)



From: Martin Kaspar martin.kas...@campus-24.com
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Subject: calendar project - should i use writer or calc
To: lagin...@gmail.com



hello dear anne,

hope you are fine.

currently i am working on the layout of a calendar for the new year 2013 -
i want to create a diary to print it out.

well i found a template that was designed in calc


*question: *should / could i design a layout for the whole year with the
calc programme
or sould i use writer for it ...?


http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/7days_in_line.jpg

http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/7_days_in_line_writer.jpg


note: i want to add some texts
365 x textblocks should be added - Losungen - ( from the Site;
http://www.losungen.de )

see the data: a:
http://www.schulcenter.org/image_uploads/losungen_template.jpg

well how to proceed

should i use calc or writer to do the job



love to hear from you
greetings

matze



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Now using LibreOffice: Need help with files created in OpenOffice...

2013-01-23 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/23/2013 06:26 PM, John Bentham wrote:

Hello,

I recently upgraded my OS from Kubuntu 8.04 with OpenOffice 2.4 to 
Kubuntu 12.04 with LibreOffice.


Unfortunately, when I open a file in LibreOffice that was created in 
OpenOffice, the text on one page now flows over to a second page.


My laptop has LibreOffice, and I compared all line spacing, margin 
settings. etc. to the same document on another desktop that still has 
OpenOffice 2.4 installed.All settings look identical.  In fact, I am 
comparing the same document using a flash drive to go between systems.


Has anyone had a similar problem?How do I resolve this without 
reformatting the entire document?


I'll be happy to send screen shots, if that will help.





I had this problem with the OOo 3.0 with LO 3.3.  The problem then was 
the default fonts.  LO installs some fonts and uses them for the defaults.


Are the fonts you are using in the .fonts hidden folder?  I have heard 
than some systems had OOo and LO fonts installed in other folders than 
the .fonts folder, including the .libreoffice/3/user/fonts folder.  
I keep that folder empty and only use the font files in the.fonts 
folder.  OOo may have a similar package defined folder where it places 
some of the fonts, like LO does. There seems to be some differences in 
some fonts that seem to have the same name.


I use Ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 with the MATE desktop environment instead 
of the KDE desktop environment, but I have that option installed if I 
want to open Ubuntu using the KDE d.e..


KDE's System Settings - Font Management utility will group your fonts 
into System and Personal fonts. My used document fonts tend to alway be 
listed on the Personal font list and not the System font list.  There 
are a lot of fonts in the System font list I never used and many were 
installed by Ubuntu 12.04 that were not installed with 10.04.  Then 
things change again with 12.10.


ALSO, even if the font that is displayed on the font drop down menu 
for the document, does not mean you actually have that font installed in 
the laptop.  If you create a document with Al Heavenly for the text, 
then place it on a flash drive and open it with a different laptop, the 
font name of Al Heavenly willshow in the document even though the 
second laptop does not have that font installed.  It shows the font that 
is tagged with the text and does not have than font grayed-out or 
other indicator that you do not have it installed.  So have you checked 
your font folder[s] to make sure the font is installed in bothsystems?


I tend toinstall a set of fonts on all my systems so I do not have this 
problem.  When you have over 100,000 [14 GB] of font files on your 
system, with a few hundred installed at any one time, it can be a 
problem to make sure you have the needed fonts installed for a document, 
if you keep changing which fonts are installed on your system.





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

2013-01-22 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


That unplugging does not work when you deal with a laptop though.

The sudo command only works with a Linux install, or live media.  That 
is why I liked the rescue disk.  You did not need to deal with 
commands.  All you had to do was boot it up and press a button or 
three.  The rest was automatic.


as for the thread title. . . .
MS was really expecting big income from their Win8 OS and their Win8 
tablet.  There seems not to be much less upgrade sales that they 
predicted.  There tablet failed to catch any real market share.  
MSO-2013 is coming out soon, but the info I have read stated that it was 
optimized to work with Win8 and its touch abilities.  How it will work 
with XP, Vista, Win7, or even Win8 with non-touch displays will be the 
key.  Also their XML .docx file format [and the others] is not 
compatible to the 2007 or 2010 XML abilities so a .docx file created 
with 2013 has a very good chance not to be readable within 2007 or 
2010.  They do this deliberately to force users to upgrade to their 
new office product[s].  This was never a good idea in a good economy, 
but even worse in todays economic conditions where businesses cannot 
afford the new pricing scheme that MSO uses now.


I have read reports showing that MS profits are less and less each 
quarter [on average].  I have not read how much their failed tablet has 
cost them though.  Still, their profits are greater than most business 
out there.  The desktop/laptop market is slowing as the tablet market is 
taking more of its market share, but the tablet sales are slowing as 
well.  It is the economic conditions, and users for personal and 
business systems do not have the capital to buy as much tech as they 
once did.


As long as there is a product like LibreOffice that is developing better 
and better filters to read/write MSO formats, I will not be buying any 
MSO products for the foreseeable future.  If MS creates a more sensible 
Windows 9 OS, I may think about upgrading my Win7 laptop to it one day, 
but not Win8.


As long as I can use Ubuntu, or other Linux OS, for my needs, I will 
prefer to use it.  I will have one Windows OS to deal with the required 
Windows hardware and software - like defragging external drives.  My TV 
and blu-ray devices do not support non-Windows disk formats so I will 
still need those large externals to be NTFS and defragged by Windows 
from time to time. Then there are the Windows-only software 
packages/utilities that deal with special features of my 
multi-function printers, like their printing of a printable CD/DVD 
media's label; or a Windows-only USB video capture device.



On 01/21/2013 08:37 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Yes, installing a new Windows alongside an existing one still does 
over-write the Mbr and hides all previous versions of Windows as well 
as any other OSes you have.  It doesn't matter if the newer version is 
on a different physical drive or on an external drive or anything else.


One trick is to physically unplug the drive with the Mbr you want to 
save and then install the newer Windows on it's own drive.  it will 
overwrite the Mbr on it's drive but will leave the unplugged drive's 
Mbr alone.  Then when you plug in the old drive then hopefully you can 
set the bios to boot the old drive first.  Of course this means the 
old drive is unaware of the new install so you'll need to run 
something like

sudo update-grub
from you old GnuLinux distro.

Regards form
Tom :)



*From:* webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
*To:* LibreO - Users Global users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, 22 January 2013, 0:39
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...


Maybe you should give the URL for the Linux-based boot repair disk
[.iso file download].  I do not remember it it.

I have two different disk type/names.

boot-repair-disk.iso - 355 MB

ubuntu-secure-remix-12.10-32-bit.iso - 787 MB
ubuntu-secure-remix-12.10-64-bit.iso - 797.1 MB

I think I used the boot-repair-disk version since all you had to
do was choose your OS version/type you are using.  I think I
remember correctly that there was only 4 buttons to choose from
once the disk/OS booted up.

My Dell laptop had 32-bit Vista even though 64-bit Vista was out
and working.  Too cheap maybe to include it, since it cost us more
for the 64-bit version back then. I just upgraded that dual boot
laptop 64-bit Win7 professional from 32-bit Vista and 64-bit
Ubuntu 12.10 from 12.04 version.  Win7/pro killed the dual booting
till I ran the repair disk.  I tend to use the Ubuntu boot for
the testing of the newest version of Ubuntu [10.04 to 10.10 to
11.04 to 11.10 to 12.04 to 12.10] before I upgrade it on my
production desktop.  I upgraded the Vista to Win7/pro [64-bit]
so I can have a working 64-bit Windows OS on one of my systems

Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

2013-01-22 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


The problem most people I know has with ME was drivers.

The big 2 reasons why I went from Vistas to Win7 were: 1) external drive 
issues, 2) support for newer hardware [driver] and software.  It also 
helped going from 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7.


I still have an XP laptop, but there are more and more hardware and 
software that wants at least Vista to run, or does not run well on XP.


The only reason to upgrade to Win8, to me, is the advanced touch 
options, as long as you have a touch display though.  My only touch 
display is on my Android tablet and that will be the case for the 
foreseeable future.



On 01/22/2013 11:19 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
  
On 1/21/2013 4:55 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Typically Windows seem to have 1 bad version followed by 1 good one and then 
the next is bad. Vista

was apparently so bad that many people said they upgraded from Vista
back to Xp. Even though that was a backwards step many considered it an
upgrade. Win7 was quite good. Before Xp was Millenium which was
generally considered so appalling that people are more likely to have
heard of Win98. So, people might be expecting Win8 to be another dead OS.


As an aside--and apropos to nothing--I actually liked Windows ME. It
fixed some networking problems I'd had with Win 98, and I never
understood why people always dogged on it so much. It worked great for me.

Vista, on the other hand, needed to be scraped from my boot from the
moment I had a computer running it. I was more than happy to upgrade to
Win 7 (although, to be honest, I still think XP was the best version of
Windows ever produced and I still run it on my computers when I have the
option). I've only had the smallest amount of time on Windows 8, but it
seems apallingly bad and I have no plans to EVER put it on any of my
systems.

- -- 
Steven Shelton


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
  
iEYEARECAAYFAlD+u/sACgkQXUonIzCvpdOS5gCePjvdLBMFteYPZqeJJur6X1zR

P7IAn0DUuSYcXAAZNbz6eYBCfZjZSNDA
=1zKn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

2013-01-22 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


The trick is to find the old style PATA laptop drives, or at least one 
that is larger than what is currently in my system.


As for doing swapping of parts, my oldest laptop I currently have 
requires you to remove the keyboard to access things like the memory 
module.  I bought two 1GB mods. and I had to give up replacing one since 
it was under the keyboard and the instructions given my the manual to 
access parts below the keyboard was totally wrong and does not work at 
all.  So I must keep the 256MB in that one and forget about getting two 
mods. installed.  The drive was in too tight to remove safely.  At least 
the Optical drive was only two screws, since I have had to replace it 
twice during the warranty time.


I know one Win7 laptop my friend has that used two drives to give him 
more space than other systems have.  I would love to replace my oldest 
laptop's drive larger than the current 80GB and my dual booting one 
needs a larger one than the 160GB drive.  Having Win7 and Ubuntu 
12.10.MATE on one small drive, does not leave much room for larger data 
files.  I rather not buy an external mobile drive that was made to be 
used with laptops.  I rather not have to make sure that an external one 
is hauled around in a bag with the laptop, packing and unpacking, etc..  
It would be much safer to have the data internally to the system.



On 01/22/2013 03:16 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:

Webmaster,
Not always true.  My HP laptop, admittedly old, has a hard drive that 
can be removed fairly easily with a screwdriver.  The trick is to have 
a spare drive and mounting frame to install.

Girvin Herr


webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


That unplugging does not work when you deal with a laptop though.


snip





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

2013-01-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/21/2013 10:41 AM, anne-ology wrote:

... maybe not, but this makes me wonder why they were promoting this
new OS and now are plugging a how-to re. it  ;-)

http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/get-free-book-windows-8-microsoft-press.htm?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmosbest+%28Gizmo%27s+Best-ever+Freeware%29

As for me, I'm very thankful there's LO, and with such a great
help-list of fellow users  :-)



The articles I have read seem to tell Win7 users to forget to upgrade to 
Win8 if you do not have a touch screen.


MS's tablet has had low sales figures, much lower than expected or the 
hype would let you believe.


So, giving tech people a free e-book about Win8 is a way for them to 
promote that OS.


I have heard from a few business users where they took their Win8 
upgrade and degrade it back to XP or Win7.  So maybe MS needs to 
convince the business users to buy the Win8 upgrade or even new Win8 
systems, instead of upgrading to, and/or buying, systems with, Win7.


I just upgraded 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7/pro instead of the cheaper 
priced Win8 deal.  I have it on a laptop that is a dual boot for 64-bit 
Win7/pro and 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10 [with MATE desktop environment].  That 
upgrade killed the dual booting so I need to use the repair disk.  The 
way I have read seems to be that Win8 would do something with that 
laptop where it would not be able to dual even after the boot fixing 
disk. I use the laptop for my main Windows laptop and the Ubuntu boot is 
where I test out the new version[s] of the OS before I install it onto 
my main production desktop.  I hate the Unity desktop for Ubuntu, so 
why would I buy Win8 with the same type of desktop tile look and feel.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

2013-01-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
 bad version followed by 1 good one 
and then the next is bad.  Vista was apparently so bad that many 
people said they upgraded from Vista back to Xp.  Even though that 
was a backwards step many considered it an upgrade. Win7 was quite 
good.  Before Xp was Millenium which was generally considered so 
appalling that people are more likely to have heard of Win98.  So, 
people might be expecting Win8 to be another dead OS.


However there is also often quite strong resistance to new things.  
Especially to new versions of Windows.  people have just about become 
familiar with the older one and don't like the newer ways of doing 
things and the fact that it's difficult to find things or work out how 
to deal with issues that they had just learned how to solve on the 
previous.  With GnuLinux it doesn't matter what changes happen to the 
DE you can always modify it or even just install the old one on your 
new OS.


Regards from
Tom :)





*From:* webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
*To:* users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Monday, 21 January 2013, 16:34
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] is MSFT running scared ...

On 01/21/2013 10:41 AM, anne-ology wrote:
... maybe not, but this makes me wonder why they were
promoting this
 new OS and now are plugging a how-to re. it  ;-)



http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/get-free-book-windows-8-microsoft-press.htm?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmosbest+%28Gizmo%27s+Best-ever+Freeware%29

As for me, I'm very thankful there's LO, and with such a
great
 help-list of fellow users  :-)


The articles I have read seem to tell Win7 users to forget to
upgrade to Win8 if you do not have a touch screen.

MS's tablet has had low sales figures, much lower than expected or
the hype would let you believe.

So, giving tech people a free e-book about Win8 is a way for them
to promote that OS.

I have heard from a few business users where they took their Win8
upgrade and degrade it back to XP or Win7. So maybe MS needs to
convince the business users to buy the Win8 upgrade or even new
Win8 systems, instead of upgrading to, and/or buying, systems
with, Win7.

I just upgraded 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Win7/pro instead of the
cheaper priced Win8 deal.  I have it on a laptop that is a dual
boot for 64-bit Win7/pro and 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10 [with MATE
desktop environment].  That upgrade killed the dual booting so I
need to use the repair disk.  The way I have read seems to be that
Win8 would do something with that laptop where it would not be
able to dual even after the boot fixing disk. I use the laptop for
my main Windows laptop and the Ubuntu boot is where I test out the
new version[s] of the OS before I install it onto my main
production desktop. I hate the Unity desktop for Ubuntu, so why
would I buy Win8 with the same type of desktop tile look and feel.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: missing dialog option in Win7 install?

2013-01-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/19/2013 06:46 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 01/19/2013 06:43 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

I just noticed a difference in the Tools  Options  LibreOffice 
General options in the 3.6.4 versions.

With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs
and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs.

With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs section
is missing.

I do not know if it is missing in my Windows installs for earlier
versions of LO, since I updated all my Windows systems to 3.6.4 last month.

I know, for Ubuntu, I need to click that check box in order to get LO to
print duplex pages properly for my Epson Artisan 810 printer. With that
option, both my HP Laserjet 2300dn and Canon MG6220 [inkjet] printers
are duplexing properly as well.

I am running Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit OS with MATE desktop environment and
Win7/pro 64-bit systems[plus Ubuntu 10.04 and Win XP/pro]  So my Linux
system show it, but my Windows systems do not.

It there a reason that DEB installs need that option and Windows do not?

Probably for the same reason that you don't have spadmin in Windows
versions... (CUPS etc).

...


Well there should be no difference with the print dialogs between 
versions.  Are you going to use the systems default print dialogs or 
the package's?  Checking the box does not change the print dialogs used 
for LO.  It is always LO's dialogs instead of the one that the other 
packages use.  So either way, it uses a different print dialog than the 
Ubuntu/Debian default print dialog used by packages like Firefox or GIMP.







--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: missing dialog option in Win7 install?

2013-01-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/20/2013 12:13 PM, Luuk wrote:

On 19-01-2013 15:43, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


I just noticed a difference in the Tools  Options  LibreOffice 
General options in the 3.6.4 versions.

With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs
and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs.

With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs section
is missing.




i just upgraded my Windows7 to Libreoffice 3.6.4.3  (from 3.6.1)
This setting did exist in 3.6.1
And it no longer there in 3.6.4.3

Enabling 'experimatal features' does not resolve this..


That is the thing, why is it needed for Ubuntu/Debian installs when it 
was removed for Windows?
I run Ubuntu 64-bit 12.04 for my main desktop with  Ubuntu 64-bit 12.10 
/ 64-bit Win7/pro on my dual boot main laptop.  I also use 32-bit Ubuntu 
and WinXP/pro on other desktops and laptops.


Right now all of my systems have 3.6.4 installed.  Next week 3.6.5 is 
due to come out.  I may test 4.0.0 on my dual booting laptop when it 
comes out.  I tend to use the Ubuntu boot to test out the newest 
versions of Ubuntu before it goes onto my desktop [where I am typing  
from, that has 5-TB of storage - maybe more coming in a few months]


I wonder if it will be in the 4.0.0 version.  I needed to check that 
print dialog option to get my Epson printer to print duplex pages properly.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] missing dialog option in Win7 install?

2013-01-19 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/19/2013 01:40 PM, Joel Madero wrote:

On 01/19/2013 06:43 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


I just noticed a difference in the Tools  Options  LibreOffice  
General options in the 3.6.4 versions.


With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs 
and the option for that is Use LibreOffice dialogs.


With my install on Windows 7 professional, that Print dialogs 
section is missing.


I do not know if it is missing in my Windows installs for earlier 
versions of LO, since I updated all my Windows systems to 3.6.4 last 
month.


I know, for Ubuntu, I need to click that check box in order to get LO 
to print duplex pages properly for my Epson Artisan 810 printer. With 
that option, both my HP Laserjet 2300dn and Canon MG6220 [inkjet] 
printers are duplexing properly as well.


I am running Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit OS with MATE desktop environment and 
Win7/pro 64-bit systems[plus Ubuntu 10.04 and Win XP/pro]  So my 
Linux system show it, but my Windows systems do not.


It there a reason that DEB installs need that option and Windows do not?

As I said, I just noticed that check box option missing on my Windows 
install.


Try enabling experimental features, I vaguely remember this 
conversation before.



Best Regards,
Joel


Experimental features?

Why would it be an experimental feature in one OS version and not in the 
other?  I do not have either Windows or Ubuntu versions' experimental 
features box checked.   I do not want any experimental feature turned on 
either.


All I know it that Ubuntu's 64-bit install has it while Windows [64-bit 
Win7] does not have that option.


Yes, there has been threads about duplexing issues before.  All I had to 
do was to check that Use LibreOffice dialogs for Print dialogs, and it 
solved the problem that was not solved since I first bought my Epson 
Artisan printer, over 1.5 years ago.  No one, as far as I remember, 
talked about this option.  But if it is only in the Linux, or Debian, 
installs and the people who were all using Windows, then they would not 
have known about the solution.


Now, with a new duplexing Canon inkjet printer, I did not even try 
printing without it on the new one.  By-the-way, The Epson Artisan 
printer is now half dead with its ink pads near end of life. Would 
cost more to replace them than replacing the actual printer.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird Address Book as Data Source

2013-01-18 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/18/2013 11:59 AM, Alex Thurgood wrote:

On 01/15/2013 03:15 AM, David Burleigh wrote:

Hi David,


It is very nice that the new 4.0 release includes support for the
Thunderbird address book as a data source for mail merges, but it seems
to only recognize the Personal Address Book and not any other address
books defined in Thunderbird. Is there any way to get it to recognize
additional address books defined within Thunderbird?


As far as I know, this is a current limitation of the addressbook, but
it is either being worked on at the moment, or will be at a later date.
The devs are also trying to get group lists read properly, I think,
because these don't currently import properly (apparently, but I haven't
tried).

Alex




Why do you want both Personaladdress book and Collected ones?  I would 
say that Thunderbird wanted them to be different so you, the user, can 
choose which address you collected by returning theemail that would go 
in your personally used address book. MOST of the collected addresses in 
its list are one-time-only emails. If they are not, then it is up to me 
to move them over.  I see no reason why someone would want an outside 
package to access the collected emails address for people you may never 
deal with again and combine it with your personal emails you chose to 
keep separate from the collected ones.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-documentation] I joined recently. How can I help?

2013-01-15 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I did not remember seeing the 3rd chapter for the Base section, the last 
time I looked at the list.  That was less than two weeks ago.



On 01/14/2013 03:46 PM, Dan Lewis wrote:

On 01/14/2013 03:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
The docs team is currently working on 2 sets of documentation for 
Base.  A full guide and a short(ish) handbook (this latter is being 
translated from the German one).  Dan has just completed 2 chapters 
for the full guide but the team would appreciate anyone that can 
spare a bit of time to review the 2 chapters
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications#LibreOffice_Base_Guide 


Regards from
Tom :)
 Pardon me, if I am being a little picky: the link you gave has 3 
chapters listed (chapter 1 is published, and chapters 2 and 3 are only 
drafts). I must have slipped the third chapter in without anyone 
noticing it.


--Dan





From: Dan Lewis

  Completing the Base Handbook might be a good idea also. 
Completing it would be nice. Chapter 5 discusses queries. This is 
the link where this can be gotten.

http://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/base-handbook/drafts

  My personal thinking is that chapters 2 and 3 might be easier 
to review for someone who has limited experience with Base because 
they deal with the basics. The later chapters of the Base Handbook 
discuss the more complex parts of Base. A working knowledge of Base 
is helpful for them. I'm thinking that the earlier chapters have 
already received reviews and at least some proofreading.

  Below is the link where my chapters can be gotten.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
   So, here are a couple of choices that need someone to do some 
work on.


--Dan








--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Base: Changing restoring (Default) font

2013-01-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/11/2013 09:28 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:

Greetings,
I am running Base in LO 3.6.4.3.  In a form, I am trying to change the 
(Default) font without any progress.  I do not know where this 
(Default) font setting is located and the styles icon on the 
toolbar, along with the font window on the toolbar are grayed out if I 
have a control selected.  They are not grayed out if I do not have any 
control selected and then I can change the Default style font to 
another font.  However, when I select a control, the control 
properties dialog still has (Default) selected and the font 
displayed in the control is not the font I changed to in the style 
dialog.  Does anyone know where to set the font assigned to the 
(Default) font?


Second, related question:  Once the control's font is changed in the 
control properties dialog to something other than (Default), how 
does one get it back to (Default)?

The (Default) option is not available in the font selection dialog.

Thanks in advance.
Girvin Herr




Tools  Options  LibreOffice Writer  Basic Fonts (Western)

It shows:
   Default
   Heading
   List
   Cation
   Index

You can change the font name and size.  Just make sure you press the 
Default buttonif you want to change the default font so it will be the 
new one next time you open LibreOffice.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Would it be OK to have an Urban dictionary words. . .

2013-01-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I was looking at some articles and one mentioned the Urban 
Dictionary.  This seems to be a list of English Language Slang words 
and phrases.


Would that be something that would be useful as a add on dictionary to 
LibreOffice?


It would not take too much of an effort to make the dictionary, just 
some days of time to get the word into a list.


So, would it be something that English users of LO use or would it be 
just a novelty?


For abit of time, that dictionary was on the IBM Watson supercomputer, 
but it kept using too much street language in improper moments.  Since 
LO is for kids to adults, students to business people, well there are a 
lot of different types and style of speech out there.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Would it be OK to have an Urban dictionary words. . .

2013-01-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/12/2013 11:35 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 01/12/2013 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


I was looking at some articles and one mentioned the Urban 
Dictionary.  This seems to be a list of English Language Slang 
words and phrases.


Would that be something that would be useful as a add on dictionary 
to LibreOffice?


It would not take too much of an effort to make the dictionary, just 
some days of time to get the word into a list.


So, would it be something that English users of LO use or would it be 
just a novelty?


For abit of time, that dictionary was on the IBM Watson 
supercomputer, but it kept using too much street language in 
improper moments.  Since LO is for kids to adults, students to 
business people, well there are a lot of different types and style of 
speech out there.



Interesting idea.

I personally do not need an Urban Dictionary but the concept of a 
specialist (technical/medical/scientific) dictionary is appealing. In 
either case I would include it as an optional extension for the user 
to install.




It will be an .oxt extension/dictionary. It will be listed as an add on 
option in the extension center so it is very optional.


As for specialist dictionaries, well I been wanting to create science, 
mathematics, and other specialized word lists that will end up in their 
very own dictionaries.  It would be great to have dictionaries that have 
the correctly spelled words used in the various science and 
technicalcourses that are taught in the universities and are part of the 
field of work for these scienceand technical people.  Would be good to 
have them for our Educational users.


All I need is the source documents that are professionally done or 
published, that do not cost me any money to buy or join like 
professional journals do.


But the difficulty to is finding the correctly spelled words online or 
in a downloadable document.  I have created a Python script that takes 
HTML files and converts them into a word list [set of lists].  I use the 
same scriptto take any text file and make it into a set of lists of 
words.  With online sources, I can cut/paste the text into LO and then 
make the word lists.  It can be easy or hard, depending on how much 
trouble it is to deal with the original online text.


Any professionally created document for their field of study should have 
a 99.% of the words correctly spelled.  One error in a 100,000words 
or so is a good statistic. I have found misspelled words in printed text 
books and other documents like that.  Noone is perfectthough.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] portable, mobile printers and a more

2013-01-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 01/10/2013 12:45 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 01/10/2013 11:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)

Does anyone use or know of good portable/mobile printers to carry 
with you when you have to work-on-the-move?  I have already asked at 
LinuxQuestions but many of my company's outreach workers use 
Windows.  Anyway, here's the LQ thread ...


http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/mobile-printers-4175444990/ 



We are hoping to prepare a funding application detailing how much it 
would cost to provide 1 outreach workers with a tablet and a printer 
and then we can show how much we need for all of them or how many we 
could make do with.  Obviously it takes a long time for funders to 
respond and even if successful the money takes even longer to arrive 
so i'm not looking for cheapest one-off deals.  I'm looking for 
reasonably reliable models and manufacturers and then i can look-up 
how much they cost.



I've had a lot of questions about printers generally this year and 
they always seem to be a pita to look after.  So, on LQ i am hoping 
to start a poll to find which manufacturer people prefer.  
Unfortunately i can only think of a very few; Hewlett Packard, 
Cannon, Brother, Oki and Ricoh.  I feel like i am missing some very 
obvious ones.  If you can think of any please can you let me know in 
this thread or at LQ
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/how-to-set-up-a-poll-here-at-lq-to-see-which-printer-company-people-prefer-4175445008/ 



Any suggestions?
Regards from
Tom :)

I guess the obvious question is what type ( and size - no. of pages) 
of documents will users print? This will influence what options are 
reasonable. Another issue is are they stationary when they are working 
such as at a client's office all day(s) or they constantly moving 
during the day - my concern is weight and size. For the former you 
might get by with a small, cheap inkjet printer readily available at 
Walmart in the US. For the latter, I do not have any good ideas 
particularly if it must be battery powered.


Option two is to create and email a pdf document.



I went to Amazon.com and entered mobile printer.  There were a lot of 
hits, with many not mobile printers.  There were some at about $200, but 
the good ones were around $500 +/-.  Some of them included batteries or 
you could get battery packs for them.  I read one that had a car 12 volt 
lighter plugin option.


Yes, the key is what you want to use it for.  The second it the price 
you can pay.


For me the third is the price for the ink.  I always check the ink costs 
for OEM and non-OEM cartridges, and printer drivers for Linux [DEBs].  I 
could get a good price on the printer but the ink could be very high, or 
you cannot get the needed OS drivers.  I just ordered a Canon printer to 
replace my Epson [ink pads are at end of life and cost too much to get 
the replaced].  The USA and Canadian sites did not have Linux drivers, 
but the UK, AU, and Asian [English pages] sites did.  The OEM ink for a 
full 2 sets would be around $150 to $180, while an non-OEM ink vendor 
would charge about $30 +/- for the same number of ink cartridges.


So if you are looking for a mobile printer, or any one, you should do a 
lot of looking at models for specifications you want/need, ink pricing, 
and needed drivers and other software it has.


For me, the prices of the truly mobile printers are way beyond what I 
can play.  For a professional sales or marketing individual, they may 
need to pay the price so they can print off the needed paperwork to be 
signed by their new clients.


For printer names - Kodak and Epson are not listed.  They may have 
mobile printer lines that might work.  How mobile is needed? 
Batteries or wall plug.  Work in car, in a spare office, or client's 
office?  How many pages [auto duplex needed?] needed to be printed out.  
The weight of the printer and its physical size.  Laptop or 
tablet/smartphone printing capabilities [yes you can print from iPads 
and some tablets now]





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] crash recovery odd behavior

2013-01-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I have not had the problem with 3.6.4, but when I did, Cancel 
sometimes worked and sometimes did not.




On 01/10/2013 07:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Have you tried the Cancel button when you get that recovery dialogue pop-up 
box?  Cancel usually clears them.  I often find that documents it worries might have been 
corrupted are actually completely fine.

Regards from
Tom :)







From: Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.com
To: cpaul...@alumni.middlebury.edu
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013, 21:55
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] crash recovery odd behavior

On 10/01/2013, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:

LO crashed ( I think I ran out of battery on my laptop) with 3 documents
open.  When re-opening some time later, 3 documents failed recovery.  I
had probably trashed the files b/c I didn't need them any more, but not
sure.  In any case, these 3 files keep coming up as having been
improperly closed every time I open LO.  They of course fail each time.
I've looked for a setting to clear out the list of files that crashed,
but can't find it.

Is this by design?  If so, can I somehow clear out the file list so it
opens normally?

Thanks,
Carl
--

Carl Paulsen





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Collate print option not working - Solved for Epson Printers

2013-01-04 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Background:

There has been a number of threads about duplex problems printing from LO.

On an Ubuntu 64-bit 10.04 and 12.04 OS, an Epson Artisan 810 printer 
would not duplex, while the HP 2300dn laser would, when printing from LO 
Writer.  The Artisan will print duplex using the default PDF reader or 
all of the other packages installed in the Ubuntu computer.


Solution:
Here is the solution that was made for the Artisan printer.



First I installed 3 different drivers for the printer to see if any of 
these would solve the problem:


1]  epson-inkjet-printer 1.0.0-1lsb3.2 (Seiko Epson Corporation LSB 3.2)
2]  epson-inkjet-printer-escpr 1.2.2-1lsb3.2 (Seiko Epson Corporation 
LSB 3.2

3]  CUPS+Gutenprint (OpenPrinting LSB 3.2) v5.2.7

None of them would print duplex by default using LO.

I went to the Options - LibreOffice - Print section and there was 
nothing there to help.

Then I started to go through all of the options.
There was one option I did not try

Options - LibreOffice - General
Print dialogs
Use LibreOffice dialogs

This checkbox is not checked by default.
I decided to try it. Well, it worked.


Why using the default setting does not work, I do not know.  Why LO does 
not use the default Print dialogs [for Ubuntu and Windows XP/Vista] like 
all the other packages do, I do not know.  You would think that if one 
printer works with the duplexing, the other would as well.  If LO used 
the default/standard printing dialogs, would it work, maybe.


Also for the print driver options:
the #2 driver - Escpr driver does not have any duplex option.

#1 and #2 do not have any resolution options other than 300 by 300 DPI, 
while #3 has many, many DPI resolution options.


the CUPS+Gutenberg - OpenPrinting - driver seems to have the best color 
results for all three printer drivers.


SO
the default in the General dialog does not work for printing duplex for 
several printers, mine included.


Why I did not check this box before?  I was told, when LO first came 
out, to use the defaults and not use the LO dialogs for Load/Save and 
Printing.


Well, it was a simple fix.  Whether it would work for the other printers 
that have duplexing issues, I do not know.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

2012-12-21 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/21/2012 01:46 PM, RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO wrote:

Me too for you and all

Regards,

Jorge Rodríguez

- Mensaje original -
De: Eliane Domingos de Sousa elianedomin...@libreoffice.org
Para: users@global.libreoffice.org
Enviados: Viernes, 21 de Diciembre 2012 7:59:50
Asunto: [libreoffice-users] Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Hi all,

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

A git for you TDF, thanks for all you do for us!
http://blog.pt-br.libreoffice.org/2012/12/21/feliz-natal-e-prospero-2013/

  From Brazilian LibreOffice Community!!!

Best



That tree would make a good image to be placed on next 
year'sLibreOffice.org's opening page.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] huge print jobs for MS Publisher Imagesetter printer

2012-12-20 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/20/2012 09:34 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:

On 12/20/2012 08:12 AM, Anna Martynova wrote:

Hello.

I noticed a strange thing in Windows version of Libre Office. When I 
print

to printer that is configured with driver MS Publisher Imagesetter,
sometimes print files are really huge. For testing purpose I used 
Print to

file option.
For example I attached a 13 kilobyte odt file that turns into 48 
megabytes

print file. It contains several lines of letters and numbers, and then
broken link to image (copied from web browser).
If I print this document to another printer (with different driver, for
example, HP LaserJet 2050) the size of print jobs is quite reasonable 
(less

than 1 megabyte).

Is it normal behavior? Have anyone else noticed that?
We met with it when we were trying to understand why printing from Libre
Office takes so much time in RDP terminal session. :) (We had files that
produced even 250 Mb of print data, of course it took much time to 
send it

to terminal client's printer).

Thanks in advance.


Anna

What is the default system printer?

MS Publisher is part of the MSO office suite and is available in the 
more expensive versions. I have no idea what the MS Publisher 
Imagesetter is for unless it is doing something like converting other 
MSO formats to MS Publisher format much like various Print to PDF 
converters work. If my guess is correct then I am not surprised that 
it garbled other file formats.





I had a big graphic map of regional railroad lines.  I created a high 
res PDF file to be printed on a plotter at 3 foot by 4 foot.  It would 
not render.  I never did get any large format prints from the 
professional equipment.  BUT, I took that same file and printed it out 
to an inkjet printer and it printed file, thought it took a long time to 
do the processing the data to be sent via the USB cable to the inkjet.


Saying that, it could be the massive amount of data that the 
Imagesetter needs to do its job, vs. what an HP printer [bw or color] 
would need.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Windows 8 Compatibility - More Info

2012-12-17 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


Right now libreoffice has 12 out of 13 votes for compatible
The Documentation Foundation has 4 out of 4 votes.

To be honest, do you really think that MS would list competition in 
their compatibility reports?  Nearly half of my major packages were 
not reported in their Win7 compatibility report, the last time I ran 
it.  Plus it told me a couple of packages were not compatible when the 
software companies advertise it works for XP through Win7.  Have not 
tried the Win8, since I will not buy it. I should buy Win7, if possible 
next month for upgrading my 32-bit Vista [dual boot with Ubuntu] to Win7 
64-bit.




On 12/17/2012 12:49 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

I wanted to check on the Access Violation that Tony experienced to see it was 
an easily reproducible situation for a Windows 8 installation of LibreOffice.

Before doing that, I installed LibreOffice 3.6.4 on a Windows XP SP3 system.  I 
then ran the Windows 8 Upgrade advisor.  The upgrade advisor did not include 
LibreOffice in its report, neither as compatible or incompatible.

However, there was a link to web resources for checking on applications not 
covered in Upgrade Advisor reports.  After nosing around, I was led to here:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/win8/CompatCenter/ProductViewerWithDefaultFilters?TempOsid=win8Locale=en-usTextSearch=LibreOffice
  
There is a Compatibility Center where reports about particular applications are crowd-sourced.  (Note that only major versions are identified.)


The dual listing for LibreOffice Version 3 is because TDF is identified as the brand in one 
source, and libreoffice in another.  The same Community Discussion backs up both, 
though.

To see how this works, I voted on the TDF entry.  I was unable to specify 
version 3.6 (only 3.3 and 3.5 are listed), nor was I asked for details.

Interesting but not totally satisfying.

  - Dennis

-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 13:39
To: 'Jay Lozier'; users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: RE: Windows 8 Compatibility (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: 
0xc005 error in RPCRT4.dll from soffice.bin)

Jay, I agree.

There are two kinds of compatibility for Windows 8.

First, desktop compatibility is essentially the same as for Windows 7.  There 
is more room for gradual upgrade to integrate more smoothly, including on x64 
machines with Atom processors, solid-state drives, and storage in the cloud.  I 
think UX features will also adjust and improve, but that will be relatively 
gradual.

[ ... ]





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO not starting after install

2012-12-13 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/13/2012 09:30 AM, David Moeser wrote:

Windows 7 professional 64 bit
installed LO successfully try to open LO error message

|---
LibreOffice  3.6  -  Fatal  Error
---
The  program cannot be started.
The  service manageris  not  available.
(cannot open /URE/services.rdb: 21)
Start  setup application to repair the installationfrom  CD, or  
the folder containing the installation packages.

---
OK
---

tried repair, install as administrator  no help
LO will not start after install

|





By chance do you have a Java Runtime installed?  If not, install one and 
then try it again.




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before release

2012-12-13 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


4.0.0.x should not be rolled out before Feb 4th.  BUT, if testers and 
the developers can fix more within the RC1 and RC2, then there will less 
for fixing for the 4.0.1 version.


As for OSs, there needs to be a lot more, a lot of different OS and 
system setups than before, if we want to really do a big testing and 
fix session.


Windows
XP, Vista, Win7 and Win8
Touch systems for Windows

Linux
Ubuntu and 2 other, different .deb mainstream OS packages
3 or more different .rpm installed package OSs

MacOSX
PPC
Intel

I do not know about Mac, but we need as many different configurations 
for Windows and Linux as we can.  I do remember something about problems 
with Netbooks in the past due to their weird screen size and aspect 
ratio.  Then there is the new touch needs with the newest Win8 systems.


How much smaller it the total install of LO vs. the space needed to 
install Word '13 and Excel '13 [or 2010, or 2007] ?  These new touch 
laptops/netbooks/convertables may have much less resources than a 
typical laptop.  So install size might be worth looking into for 
marketing towards these systems.


ALSO
maybe we can do something to the download system that does not default 
to 4.0.0.x over the 3.6.5 version.  Give the choice upfront and not the 
relatively smaller text for change of system or version than the big 
green buttons.  Since it is no longer a 3.6.x to 3.7.x change, but a 
3.6.x to 4.0.0 change, it needs to be well thought out on how it is 
presented.  It the 4.0.0 going to be stating for early adopters like 
the graph has stated all this time on the Release Plan page?  [the 
graph still shows 3.7]  We do not want new users to be defaulted to 
4.0.0.x if there are any issues that would turn them off, that would not 
be there within the 3.6.5 version.  We do not need any bad press with 
a major version change that this will look like to new users.


I may be blowing smoke asking this, but it would be better than 
defaulting to 4.0.0.x for all users, if the new users could try 3.6.5 
before trying a #.0.0 version.


Ultra-Stable is now wording we want to avoid, since it could be 
ultra-stable for most but there can be almost show-stopper issues 
that do not affect the stability.



On 12/13/2012 07:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I am really impressed that people are already taking part.  Nicely done Paolo!  
It should be fun and will be good.  Lets try to get the 4.0.0 ultra stable 
earlier in it's cycle so we can use and roll it out  sooner.  I hope to 
test-drive it a bit on 3 different types of machines and on 3 different OSes.

I  recommend making a back-up copy of your user-profile.  Copypaste is a good 
way to do that.
wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/UserProfile

I think i'm going to do straight installs wiping out the current versions of LO 
on those machines.  After testing i can reinstall the older version that 
everyone in the office is on and copy back the old user-profiles.  If you can 
do a parallel install instead then that would probably be a much better way.

Good luck and happy hunting all!
Regards from
Tom :)







From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
To: Paolo Debortoli paolo_debort...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012, 20:50
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before release

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Paolo Debortoli paolo_debort...@yahoo.com

wrote:
i think everything is working well at the moment. i have found very
marginal problems with LO until now.  i just suggested time ago that LO
should include an automatic crash report (such as ms office, firefox and
other software), which can be enabled or disabled by the user in the
software settings (or which asks every time: do you want to send this
information?) and which should send in a database some information (eg
operating system, software version, type of document, type of operation and
so on) every time it notices a crash in the software (for example in my
case LO crashed more times trying to open .docx documents).  This could
make much easier to compile lists of bugs and issues.


I'll bring this up during QA call to see if it's been discussed. Thanks for
the suggestion :)


Regards,
Joel






   From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Suggest adding one more QA step before
release

On 12/13/2012 07:09 AM, webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:

I think an office suite should be stable.

So, I think to emphasize the importance of quality assurance is vital.

May I suggest adding a step checking if the office suite starts properly?

LibreOffice should support most hardware and software configurations.

If it does not start in one case, please postpone and stop the release.

I'm one of the people really involved with QA and 

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3,5,5,3: Odd miror-image landscape diff with LO 3.4.5

2012-12-13 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I wonder if it would change again with the 3.6.4 version.
Are you using the Mageia repository version of LO or the LO site download?

Manual feed, or tray feed?

I know that LO can have some printer setting issues that other software 
[like default PDF reader] do not.  My problem is duplexing.  Would the 
Envelope feeding be a similar issue?  Also, why do you need to use left 
or right side of the feeder?  My HP laser printers use a center-feeding 
option for envelopes.



On 12/13/2012 08:42 PM, anne-ology wrote:

Odd that the printer settings should change -



On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Maurice Batey maur...@bcs.org.uk wrote:

I have a 'long-envelope' file that I use fpr printing out envelopes with

my address on the left and an addressee box on the right.

Using LO 3.4.5 under Mandriva 2010.2 I insert the blank envelope on the
RIGHT-hand side of the printer (HP5150) paper feed. Works fine.

Using LO 3.5.5.3 under Mageia-2 and the same envelope file, I have to
insert the blank envelope on the LEFT-hand side of the same printer's
paper feed.

Not a problem, but can anyone suggest an explanation  for the
difference, please?

--
/\/\aurice
 (Retired in Surrey, UK) Registered Linux User #487649





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system

2012-12-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P



I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads, 
installs, and updates, a list of packages for you.


I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed.

This statement is what worries me though:

No Clicking Next, Next, Next
Ninite fully automates installers offscreen.

See what you think.

http://ninite.com/

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system

2012-12-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/12/2012 09:57 AM, Joel Madero wrote:

On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:



I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads, 
installs, and updates, a list of packages for you.


I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed.

This statement is what worries me though:

No Clicking Next, Next, Next
Ninite fully automates installers offscreen.

See what you think.

http://ninite.com/

When I used Windows years ago I used to ninite quite frequently, it's 
just a small installer that then pulls the individual installers and 
then goes through them automatically, pretty functional.


Regards,
Joel



What I do not like it the statements that makes me feel that I have no 
control of how the packages are installed.  I always do a custom install 
of packages to make sure I only install things I want.  For LO, I make 
sure I install only the languages and dictionaries I want.  There are 
some packages that has a default of adding toolbars and other things 
to other packages, like browsers, that are not acceptable to my point of 
view.


I never heard of this Ninite so I did not know about how much trust 
I would give it.


Also, does Windows LO still need a JRE installed BEFORE it gets 
installed?  Use to be yes.  If such a auto install system tries to 
install LO with no JRE installed first, then problems. . . .




--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice is now on a auto install auto update system

2012-12-12 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/12/2012 11:02 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:

On 12-12-12 10:10 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:

On 12/12/2012 09:57 AM, Joel Madero wrote:

On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:


I got an e-zine this morning about a package that is downloads,
installs, and updates, a list of packages for you.

I fount LibreOffice 3.6.4 listed.

This statement is what worries me though:

No Clicking Next, Next, Next
Ninite fully automates installers offscreen.

See what you think.

http://ninite.com/


When I used Windows years ago I used to ninite quite frequently, it's
just a small installer that then pulls the individual installers and
then goes through them automatically, pretty functional.

Regards,
Joel


What I do not like it the statements that makes me feel that I have no
control of how the packages are installed.  I always do a custom
install of packages to make sure I only install things I want.  For
LO, I make sure I install only the languages and dictionaries I want.
There are some packages that has a default of adding toolbars and
other things to other packages, like browsers, that are not acceptable
to my point of view.

It's extremely useful to build new Windows systems (ie mass installs).
It's not free open source though.


I never heard of this Ninite so I did not know about how much
trust I would give it.

Also, does Windows LO still need a JRE installed BEFORE it gets
installed?  Use to be yes.  If such a auto install system tries to
install LO with no JRE installed first, then problems. . . .

So don't use it. Use one of the free open source alternatives,
testit/file a bug report to help fix/test it:
http://alternativeto.net/software/ninite/?license=opensource

F.
I have a list of software that I prefer to install on Windows systems 
[even though I prefer Linux].


That list included LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, and a few 
Image/Graphics software, Then I add the security software that I prefer 
to use.


That service does not include much of what I would add to a new system 
or suggest to users for their systems.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: A Tale of Two Office Suites

2012-12-11 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/11/2012 05:02 AM, Pedro wrote:

NoOp wrote

I wonder what office suites you are using. Neither LO or AOO default
to turning a (c) into a © - (C) does.

But guess what? Microft Word does it for both... (c) and (C).

Next...

So, based on this small detail you insinuate that the user is lying and
ignore all the rest of the message...

That is exactly the kind of support that people need on a User mailing list!

Please think about this: Don't say/write everything that you think, but
think everything that you say/write




Are you using this extension?

Compose Special Characters - extension - Compose Special Characters lets 
you type two or three characters and use a keyboard shortcut to convert 
them into a single accented or special character.  You can also compose 
unicode characters using its 4 character unicode value.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS Office MacIntosh to Libre Writer Windows

2012-12-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/10/2012 01:36 PM, bsn wrote:

Hi Miroslaw
I needed some delay to check what software my friend had used : it was Pages , 
and I was using LO 3.5
Thx to your advice, I've installed LO 3.6.4.3 and the problem has disappeared.
I now can read the Mac docs.
Thanks to you, and thx also to everybody that has spent time to reply

Bruno

From: Mirosław Zalewski [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:21 PM
To: bsn
Subject: Re: MS Office MacIntosh to Libre Writer Windows

On 27/11/2012 at 18:47, bsn [hidden email] wrote:


Recently a guy sent me a doc created on a Mac.
It is impossible to open it . LO opens a small window (ASCII filter
options) and converts the doc to a unreadable scribble.

Perhaps he created it using Apple Pages? Then you have encountered #53909
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53909)

This is fixed in LO 3.6.4-rc2, which will be released this week.
Or you can wait until next week, when 3.6.4 will be officially released (it will
be bit-by-bit identical to rc2, so I suggest downloading rc2 when it is
ready).

Or, if this is matter of life and death, you can downgrade to 3.5.4 (but not
3.5.5 or later).

Why was the bug in the later versions of 3.5.x?
I have not kept up with this thread, since I am not a Mac person, but I 
have 2 friends that are and I keep them up on the availability of the 
new versions.


I have been using 3.5.7 till 3.6.4 came out.  So would they if they took 
my advice.


Also, this email seemed to have been delayed since you talk about 3.6.4 
coming out next week, when it has been out since the 5th or 6th, and I 
just got this email.






--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites

2012-12-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P


I prefer to keep the folders for package separate, just in case there is 
a problem with one and I would have the other to use.


I just make sure I backup all the major dot folders on my Linux 
systems every few days and not worry about the others except monthly.


do not use both LO and AOO on the same system.

On 12/10/2012 08:35 PM, VA wrote:

Tom,

I absolutely agree. It never occurred to me to use the Paths function to point 
both programs to the same template folder. It’s a great idea.

I was only concerned about corruption as I’ve seen that issue come up so many 
times on both LO and AOO user lists, although I’ve never had the problem with 
mine before.

Virgil

From: Tom Davies
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:09 PM
To: VA ; users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites

Hi :)
It might be easier to keep track of your back-ups if you are only backing up 1 
folder rather than 2.

Regards from
Tom :)






--
   From: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com
   To: users@global.libreoffice.org
   Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2012, 0:36
   Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites


   Tom,

   Thanks for the tip.

   But, don't I run the risk of having one or both programs corrupting my user
   configuration?

   Virgil


   -Original Message-
   From: Tom Davies
   Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:40 PM
   To: RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO ; VA
   Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
   Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites

   Hi :)
   Perhaps try this in either Office Suite

   Tools - Options - Paths

   and set them both to read the same folders.  That way all your settings
   should be the same regardless of which program you happen to have open at
   the time.  I'm considering using that sort of approach to make the GnuLinux
   side of dual boots read the same settings as the WIndows side but i have a
   lot of other things to figure out first.

   Regards from
   Tom :)





   
From: RODRIGUEZ FONSECA JORGE ALBERTO jrodrigue...@cpcecr.com
   To: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com
   Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
   Sent: Monday, 10 December 2012, 22:53
   Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites
   
   +1 agree
   
   - Mensaje original -
   De: VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com
   Para: users@global.libreoffice.org
   Enviados: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre 2012 16:28:35
   Asunto: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites
   
   I may be way out of line here, but I’m sending this post to the user lists
   for both LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice. I have both programs on my
   computer and regularly use both. Like many of you out there, I have
   subscribed to both user lists.
   
   I don’t know the full history behind the Libre/Oracle split, but from what
   I
   have read on various forums and lists, there is considerable emotional pain
   resulting from the split. The result is two different FOSS office suites.
   
   Some have pleaded for the two to combine forces. Others have noted that the
   competition is good for the end user as it results in more rapid
   development
   of improvements to both suites.
   
   I see both sides, but I’d like to point out one thing I have noticed in my
   own use of the two programs. Some computer programs are what I would call
   “load and use.” Programs like web browsers and mail clients, etc., require
   little to no configuration or customization. One can simply do productive
   use without much thought. I can easily bounce back and forth between
   Internet Explorer and Firefox, Live Mail and Thunderbird.
   
   Not so with office suites. To get the most out of my office suites, I
   create
   and edit templates, page, character and paragraph styles. I have to set the
   autocorrect functions of each program to my liking to prevent a (c) from
   turning into a ©.  While it’s not essential, I tend to customize my
   toolbars
   and have created helpful macros. Effectively using an office suite requires
   a commitment akin to a marriage.
   
   For this reason, bouncing back and forth between two suites is
   counterproductive. I find myself importing and exporting settings, styles,
   and templates between the two programs rather than simply doing my work.
   
   Why do I put up with this inconvenience? Because each program has essential
   virtues over the other.
   
   For example, if I need to properly hyphenate my US English, I use
   LibreOffice as (to date), OpenOffice fails to properly hyphenate US
   English.
   
   But, if I need to create mailing lists, as I just did for Christmas cards,
   I
   use OpenOffice as its Avery 5160 template is more properly aligned than
   that
   found in LibreOffice.
   
   LibreOffice remembers my hierarchical stylelist setting, whereas OpenOffice
   does not, but OpenOffice more effectively supports the 

Re: [libreoffice-users] A Tale of Two Office Suites

2012-12-10 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P

On 12/10/2012 10:25 PM, VA wrote:

do not use both LO and AOO on the same system.

Why not?

Virgil



1 - I do not use AOO [or OOo before AOO came out] since I started using 
LO almost 2 years ago.


2 - I do not think it is wise to use two packages that are both forks 
from the original OOo code base, on the same system.  Yes there are 
procedures you can do to have both packages installed on the same 
system, just like you can have two versions of LO installed on the same 
system.  Just because you can do something does not mean it is something 
that you should do.


3 - 1 and 2 are reasons enough. Whether or not there are people who do 
not believe the same way that I do, this is what I believe.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


  1   2   3   4   5   >