Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-17 Thread Keegan Witt
Actually, for Gpars, that's in the Groovy binary zip, so that's included already. On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:42 PM Keegan Witt wrote: > > I hear you. But where do you draw the line? > > There are a lot of popular libraries we also could include besides Gpars and > Scriptom (e.g. Geb, Spock,

Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-17 Thread Keegan Witt
I hear you. But where do you draw the line? There are a lot of popular libraries we also could include besides Gpars and Scriptom (e.g. Geb , Spock , groovy-wslite ,

Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-11 Thread Daniel Sun
Yep. e.g. banks usually does not allow employees access Internet. Luckily some of them will setup maven server. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html

Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-11 Thread MG
Just a general reminder: Not every company using Groovy has unrestricted internet access... :-) Cheers, mg On 11/02/2019 14:11, Keegan Witt wrote: Do folks using it really need it to be in the lib directory with all the other jars? Or could they just use Grapes/Grab? If it's truly helpful, I

RE: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-11 Thread Merlin Beedell
07 045 0528 Mob: +44 (0)7876 226865 Cryoserver: A focused, flexible email archive delivered by experts From: Keegan Witt Sent: 11 February 2019 2:24 AM To: users@groovy.apache.org Subject: Groovy file associations on Windows In addition to removing projects that are no longer developed from the Gro

Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-11 Thread Keegan Witt
Do folks using it really need it to be in the lib directory with all the other jars? Or could they just use Grapes/Grab? If it's truly helpful, I can keep it. I'm just wondering if it's overkill. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 2:19 AM Paul King I'd be inclined to keep GPars in the mix for now. It isn't

Re: Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-10 Thread Paul King
I'd be inclined to keep GPars in the mix for now. It isn't actively maintained but is still very useful in its current form and I hope to put some time into it at some stage. Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:24 PM Keegan Witt wrote: > In addition to removing projects that are no

Groovy file associations on Windows

2019-02-10 Thread Keegan Witt
In addition to removing projects that are no longer developed from the Groovy Windows installer (Gpars, Gaelyk, Scriptom, EasyB, Gant, GMock), I'm considering removing the exe files from groovy-native-launcher . These haven't been compiled in