Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-03-01 Thread Pierre
lllact...@gmx.net wrote: We had such problems with Adobe's PDF acroread, which seemed to cause the slowing down of not only OOo 3.0.1. After removing Adobe acroread (to not come into the temptation to start it) the problems dissapeared. You only have to have Adobe's PDF Reader (acroread) to run

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-28 Thread Pierre
Richard wrote: OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters. Troll, surely? -- Pierre Worrigee, NSW, ,-._|\ / Oz \ \_,--._/ v The boys dressed themselves, hid their accoutrements, and

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-28 Thread lllact...@gmx.net
David B Teague wrote: OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start, slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter -- which appears only to suppress the splash screen. I'm hoping that 3.1.0 will be significantly better. I just has to be better. Occasionally OO.o stops

[users] Acrobat Reader (was Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish)

2009-02-28 Thread Dave Post
On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:33 AM, lllact...@gmx.net wrote: We had such problems with Adobe's PDF acroread, which seemed to cause the slowing down of not only OOo 3.0.1. After removing Adobe acroread (to not come into the temptation to start it) the problems dissapeared. You only have to have

Re: [users] Acrobat Reader (was Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish)

2009-02-28 Thread lllact...@gmx.net
Dave Post wrote: On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:33 AM, lllact...@gmx.net wrote: We had such problems with Adobe's PDF acroread, which seemed to cause the slowing down of not only OOo 3.0.1. After removing Adobe acroread (to not come into the temptation to start it) the problems dissapeared. You only

[users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread Richard
OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters. I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very slow operation, my staff are complaining

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread M Henri Day
2009/2/27 Richard judgesi...@netscape.net OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters. I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have used OOo since ver 1 but can no longer support its very

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread David B Teague
OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start, slower than 2.4, even with the QuickStarter -- which appears only to suppress the splash screen. I'm hoping that 3.1.0 will be significantly better. I just has to be better. Occasionally OO.o stops responding. Maybe a

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:36 +0100, M Henri Day wrote: 2009/2/27 Richard judgesi...@netscape.net OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters I am officially removing OOo 3 from my office 7 machines, I have

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2009/2/27 Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:36 +0100, M Henri Day wrote: 2009/2/27 Richard judgesi...@netscape.net OOo3 is the worst version ever and like Netscape ver 4 a complete disaster that will loose countless users and loyal supporters I am

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

2009-02-27 Thread Christina Godinez
I really enjoy the OO 3.0 big improvement and I have no problem.. --- On Fri, 2/27/09, Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com wrote: From: Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish. To: users@openoffice.org, awill...@whitemice.org Date: Friday, February 27