Hi,
You could try to add " net.inet.carp.drop_echoed=1" to pfsense in
/etc/sysctl.conf ?
It is an old fix for VMWare and FreeBSD. I am not able to test it at the
moment but I can see it's not in the config of the latest version of
PFSense.
Maybe this will help?
Hello,
I remember reading some posts about this in the past, but I don't know if
anything came of it. Is this now possible? If so, does anybody have any
documentation on how to do this in 4.0?
Thanks,
Dan
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
Hi,
We have a 3 hosted-engine nodes setup using 2 NFS3 shares on which the
engine keeps crashing every few days.
Looking at VDSM logs, it looks like a storage problem but I'm wondering why
don't they restart the engine?
___
Users mailing list
Sorry, hit send by accident.
More details :
When I notice that the engine is down, if I type hosted-engine --vm-status
on any hosts, it hangs and then writes a bunch of stuff saying it's down.
If I type hosted-engine --vm-start on one of the hosts (Any), it just
starts and gets back to business.
On 01. 12. 2014 14:40, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Le 01/12/2014 13:23, Juan Hernández a écrit :
On 12/01/2014 12:51 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
not sure what sdk version 3.4.4 is, but according to log, latest
official for 3.4 is 3.4.1.1-1
(make you have it installed)
There are two issues here.
Matt,
In order to use CARP/VRRP in a VM you have to disable MAC spoofing prevention.
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/032839.html
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Matt ."
Date: Tuesday 12 July 2016 at 21:58
To: users
This doesn't looks really good, right ? Should I report that somewhere ?
I actually had this bug when using RHEL7 profile for a Fedora 24 (to provide
enough vram, because the default with other profiles is really lower).
[Wed Jul 13 11:00:12 2016] [ cut here ]
[Wed Jul
Hi,
could you please share also vdsm.log from your hosts and also server.log
and setup logs from /var/log/ovirt-engine/setup directory?
Thanks
Martin Perina
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We upgraded from 3.6.6 to 4.0.0 and we have a big issue since
Hi Pavel,
This is done and used without the Bond before.
Now I applied a bond it goes wrong and I'm searching but can't find a
thing about it.
2016-07-13 11:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev :
> Matt,
>
> In order to use CARP/VRRP in a VM you have to disable MAC spoofing prevention.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In oVirt-4.0 we introduced integration with metrics collectors, In [1] you
> will find a guide for utilizing your environment to retrieve visualized
> reports about hosts and vms statistics.
>
> I encourage to
On 07/13/2016 10:30 AM, Jure Kranjc wrote:
> On 01. 12. 2014 14:40, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
>> Le 01/12/2014 13:23, Juan Hernández a écrit :
>>> On 12/01/2014 12:51 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
not sure what sdk version 3.4.4 is, but according to log, latest
official for 3.4 is 3.4.1.1-1
Hello!
very nice implementation - and very good blog entry.
IMHO a very important metric should be made available: IOPS.
IOPS are a very important factor when using shared storage among a
cluster. It is a key indicator for identifying issues and performance
bottlenecks and also having a base
The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the Second
Release Candidate of oVirt 4.0.1 for testing, as of July 13th, 2016.
This is pre-release software. Please take a look at our community page[1]
to know how to ask questions and interact with developers and users.
All issues or
Hi,
In oVirt-4.0 we introduced integration with metrics collectors, In [1] you
will find a guide for utilizing your environment to retrieve visualized
reports about hosts and vms statistics.
I encourage to try that out and send us requests for additional valuable
metrics that you think vdsm
Matt,
How is CARP implemented? Is it OpenBSD?
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Matt ."
Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 12:42
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1
Hi Pavel,
This is done
As addition: I get the same result using mode=4, only when I use
multiple VLANS on the interface.
2016-07-13 15:58 GMT+02:00 Matt . :
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Thanks for your update. I also saw that the post are both online but I
> thought the second nic only advertises the mac so
In mode=1 the active interface sends traffic, but both interfaces accept
incoming traffic. Hardware switches send broadcast/multicast/unknown
destination MACs to all ports, including the passive interface. So packet sent
from the active interface can be received back from the passive interface.
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for your update. I also saw that the post are both online but I
thought the second nic only advertises the mac so the switch does not
get confused.
The issue might be that i do VRRP, so the bond is connected to two
switches, they are not stacked, only trunked as that's what VRRP
How can it lead into packet duplication when the passive should not be
active and only it's mac-address should be visible on the switch to
prevent confusion on the switch ?
For a VRRP setup on the switch there is no other option then mode=1 as
far as I know ?
2016-07-13 14:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel
> On 13 Jul 2016, at 10:36, nico...@devels.es wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We upgraded from 3.6.6 to 4.0.0 and we have a big issue since the engine
> cannot connect to hosts. In the logs all we see is this error:
4.0.1 might be a better bet. There were quite a few json-rpc issues around the
time of
20 matches
Mail list logo