[ovirt-users] Hosts Network Management

Hi all, is it possible to set a comment at the beginning of a file for network files -> something like don't touch this anymore please? I want to configure my network stuff on the cli and not via the UI because I failed now a few times. Thx Kai -- SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer,

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

There is documentation online (and within the project). See http://ovirt.github.io/ovirt-engine-api-model/master/ There are tens of examples in the RPM (and online). See https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/tree/master/sdk/examples HTH, Y. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Fabrice Bacchella

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a different method with a different name that return a associated service, so it's not possible to have a generic like: def resolve(service, ...): id = . return service.service(id) because the generic call

Re: [ovirt-users] Problem Ovirt 4.1

Hi, What do you mean by it is not possible ? Glance is still supported as an external provider in 4.1. Can you explain what you are trying to do ? Thanks, Fred On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:21 PM, eric stam wrote: > On my Ovirt 4.1 environment, is is not possible anymore to import

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Roadmap

https://www.mail-archive.com/users@ovirt.org/msg40244.html Le 06/04/2017 à 15:29, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : There isn't any yet. We are still trying to figure it out. I would say that the general theme would be smaller releases in shorter cycles, with emphasis on higher overall quality, ease of

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > Seriously though - perhaps you could borrow code from our Ansible module? > See[1]. > If the code already exists, why it's not already in the sdk instead of having to dig throw external code ?

[ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF update error every hour

After upgrading an oVirt cluster from 3.5 to 3.6, I am getting the following error every hour: Failed to update OVF disks ce8647c6-f936-4633-8a7b-e7dcb45d8ebb, OVF data isn't updated on those OVF stores (Data Center Middle-Earth, Storage Domain equallogic). Looking in the vdsm log on

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Roadmap

There isn't any yet. We are still trying to figure it out. I would say that the general theme would be smaller releases in shorter cycles, with emphasis on higher overall quality, ease of use (UI improvements - look & feel and functionality, continue to improve documentation, especially around

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> Yes I'm starting to understand that

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:47, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > Perhaps in your case. Here[1] is an example of the ovirt system tests, which > were only partially converted (work in progress...) to v4 API. yes that really related to my use case. Another problem that I have with lack

Re: [ovirt-users] mapping shell fencing opions with gui ones for ipmilan agent

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Hello, > executing from host itself the following command it works > > [root@ov300 ~]# fence_ipmilan -P -a 10.10.193.103 -l fenceuser -A > password -L operator -S /usr/local/bin/pwd_ov300.sh -o status > Status:

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The old skd3 code is just good to be thrown away. There is no hope > thinking about "migrating code". And as it's just a

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is pointless. The old skd3 code is just good to be thrown away. There is no hope thinking about "migrating code". And as it's just a thin layer around REST calls, it's up to us to try to make something usable around that. So I

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:47, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > > > > Perhaps in your case. Here[1] is an example of the ovirt system tests, > which were only partially converted (work in

[ovirt-users] oVirt Roadmap

Hi, Does anyone know if there is a roadmap for oVirt 4.x published online any where? I can't seem to be able to find one for 4.x only for the 3.x releases. Regards John --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> Yes I'm starting to understand that

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > >> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul > > a

[ovirt-users] Problem Ovirt 4.1

On my Ovirt 4.1 environment, is is not possible anymore to import images from "external providers". In previous versions, it was possible. Is this a bug, or is there something I have to do to get this working again. I starten with a previous version of Overt 4 and in that version it was working

[ovirt-users] Separating NFS network flow

Hi, Is there a way to separate the network flow from NFS ? I know it is possible to do it with VM, display, ovirtmgmt, iSCSI, but what about NFS ? Does it use ovirtmgmt ? Thanks in advance ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org

Re: [ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF update error every hour

Chris, Make sure you have vdsm >= 4.17.35 installed. -Original Message- From: on behalf of Chris Adams Date: Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 16:29 To: "users@ovirt.org" Subject: [ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF update

Re: [ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF update error every hour

I’d suggest to update it from http://thepax.gitlab.io/ovirt36/ -Original Message- From: Chris Adams Date: Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 18:47 To: Pavel Gashev Cc: "users@ovirt.org" Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On 6 April 2017 at 18:00, Fabrice Bacchella wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a different > method with a different name that return a associated service, so it's not > possible to have a generic like: > > def resolve(service,

Re: [ovirt-users] After 3.5->3.6 upgrade, OVF update error every hour

That version of vdsm doesn't seem to be in the ovirt-3.6 repos - where would I get it? My plan is to continue upgrading to 4.0 and then 4.1. Does that version (or newer) come from 4.0+? If so, is it safe to upgrade to 4.0 with the older vdsm, or should I update vdsm first (to eliminate this

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a > different method with a different name that return a associated service, so > it's not possible to have a generic like: > > def

Re: [ovirt-users] New SAN Storage Domain: Cannot deactivate Logical Volume

Thanks Alexey, Nir/Adam/Raz - any initial thoughts about that? have you encountered that issue before? Regards, Liron On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Николаев Алексей < alexeynikolaev.p...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hi Liron, > > Well, this error appear on freshly installed oVirt hosted engine

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > Seriously though - perhaps you could borrow code from our Ansible > module? See[1]. > > > > If the code already exists, why it's not

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 20:06, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul > > a

Re: [ovirt-users] mount glusterfs from 127.0.0.1

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:33 PM, /dev/null wrote: > Jason, > > yes - thats how i am doing it. I wonder if its better to access the local > bricks > primarily for both relyability and performance/load. > > - if one node fails, it does not mean an impact if we access

Re: [ovirt-users] mount glusterfs from 127.0.0.1

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:53 AM, /dev/null wrote: > Hello all together, > > having a three node oVirt cluster for virtualization and gluster, each node > providing > bricks for a replica 3 volume, I would like to mount the volume from > 127.0.0.1 to > distribute i/o and to

Re: [ovirt-users] mount glusterfs from 127.0.0.1

Jason, yes - thats how i am doing it. I wonder if its better to access the local bricks primarily for both relyability and performance/load. - if one node fails, it does not mean an impact if we access 127.0.0.1 - if i write to 127.0.0.1 it might be faster than accessing on network host from

Re: [ovirt-users] New SAN Storage Domain: Cannot deactivate Logical Volume

Actually I was seeing something similar yesterday and I have seen very sporadic failures in this area in the past. It seems that in some cases the VG is not properly set up before we try to use it (perhaps a race with devicemapper). I wonder if adding some sleeps in BlockStorageDomain.create()

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 20:06, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> >> > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrading libguestfs to import debian VM

Hi, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:33:36 +0100 Simon Vincent wrote: > I find that running oVirt 4.1.1 I can not import any debian based VMs as > virt-v2v/libguestfs is too old. > This bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362497 > indicates that newer versions of

[ovirt-users] mapping shell fencing opions with gui ones for ipmilan agent

Hello, executing from host itself the following command it works [root@ov300 ~]# fence_ipmilan -P -a 10.10.193.103 -l fenceuser -A password -L operator -S /usr/local/bin/pwd_ov300.sh -o status Status: ON [root@ov300 ~]# But I'm unable to obtain successful test result in web admin fencing agent

Re: [ovirt-users] VM in oVirt 4 sometimes does not have proper CPU guest count

Hi all, I still have this issue and would like to know what we can do to debug this or figure out why this is happening? We are now in 4.1.0 on the engine and the host in question, and still face the same problem on some Ubuntu VMs. Thanks a lot for any pointers, Kind regards, Christophe >

[ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 4.1.1 Async release

The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the oVirt 4.1.1 Async Release, as of April 6th, 2017 Following oVirt 4.1.1 GA the oVirt team identified some bugs worth to be addressed out of the usual release cycle. For this reason an async release including these fixes has been

[ovirt-users] Upgrading libguestfs to import debian VM

I find that running oVirt 4.1.1 I can not import any debian based VMs as virt-v2v/libguestfs is too old. This bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362497 indicates that newer versions of libguestfs support importing debian and Ubuntu VMs. Are there any plans to include a newer

Re: [ovirt-users] MAC Address is already in use; several of times before Nic/MAC is acceppetd

Hi, you're the second (if I'm counting correctly) person able to reproduce this. So far we do not know what is causing this, and all tests we made so far cannot reproduce this. Previous unlucky user had problem, that he had less available macs in MAC pool, than actual nics in system. This does

[ovirt-users] SKD4

I trying to migrate my python code from sdk3 to sdk4, is there any migration doc, documentation help about that ? Even google is unable to find anything relevant about that. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra Machacek a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py , for every >

Re: [ovirt-users] for some reason ovirtnode creates unecessary vg and lvs

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:15 PM, martin chamambo > wrote: > >> I managed to configure the mail iscsi domain for my ovirt 4.1 engine and >> node , it connects to the storage initially and initialises

Re: [ovirt-users] for some reason ovirtnode creates unecessary vg and lvs

I created a vg and an lv using targetcli on a centos 7.3 host,managed to connect my ovirtengine on that Lv When I reboot my engine and nodes, the storage won't come up and when I check my storage server,the lun will have been deleted and those lvs and vg will be automatically created.I have