Hello all,
I'm attempting to replace a dead host in a replica 2 + arbiter gluster
setup and replace it with a new host.
I've already set up a new host (same hostname..localdomain) and got into
the cluster.
$ gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 2
Hostname: office-wx-hv3-lab-gfs
Uuid:
Hi there! I want to know what can i do with this trouble
[root@ovirt-h2-new ~]# gluster volume heal data info
Brick ovirt-h1-new.local:/gluster/ovirt_new/data
/
Status: Connected
Number of entries: 1
Brick ovirt-h2-new.local:/gluster/ovirt_new/data
/
Status: Connected
Number of entries: 1
My setup is 3 Centos 7 servers hyper-converged with a 4th stand alone engine
server. My issue is Ovirt is reading the cluster disk as 49GiB instead of 5.5
TB is should be.
One server has a 928 GB raid 5 volume, the second has a 7,7 TB raid 10 volume
and the third has a 5.5 TB raid 10 volume.
Hi all,
I have a small question. How to configure gluster to use multiple disks for
a volume?
[image: image.png]
Do I need to configure a RAID or LVM that group all disks or I can specify
the disks to use in the GUI?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Mustapha AISSAT.
Hello,
in environment in subject, I downloaded from glance repository the CentOS 8
image
CentOS 8 Generic Cloud Image v20200113.3 for x86_64 (5e35c84)
and imported as a template.
I created a vm based on it (I got the message: "In order to create a VM
from a template with a different chipset,
Hello,
I am having the following issue, it has been a few days and healing never
finishes, any ideas on how to fix the unsynced entries?
[root@host1 vmstore]# gluster vol heal vmstore info
---
Brick host1:/gluster_bricks/vmstore/vmstore
Hi,
After playing a bit with oVirt and Gluster in our pre-production environment
for the last year, we have decided to move forward with a our production design
using ovirt 4.3.7 + Gluster in a hyperconverged setup.
For this we are looking get answers to a few questions that will help out with
Hi,
I've deployed an oVirt HC starting with latest oVirt Node 4.3.6; this is my
simple network plan (FQDNs only resolves the front-end addresses):
front-end back-end
engine.ovirt192.168.110.10
node1.ovirt 192.168.110.11 192.168.210.11
Hello,
In an oVirt 4.3 cluster there are a number of gluster hooks out of
sync. When I try to resolve any of the conflicts from the engine it comes back
with operation cancelled with the error message "Error while executing action
Update Gluster Hook: Internal Engine Error"
In
Hello Community,
can someone tell me why the option cluster.choose-local was added to "Optimize
for Virt Store" ?Testing my cluster after the patching showed reduced
performance , due to relying constantly on network instead of using local NVME
brick.I have checked my older volumes and they did
Hello,
I want to deploy ovirt (hosted engine) and gluster on three servers. I
have thought about a configuration but I'm not sure that it's the most
suitable one.
All the servers have 2 ten gigabit Ethernet nic.
I read that, am besten, I must dedicate one nic for the storage and
another one
Hi,
I have my 5 ovirt nodes up and running and starting to move forward with actual
ovirt and gluster setup.
I am using gdeploy for deployment.
the play book fails saying /dev/sdb is blacklisted by filter? I am following
the blog up and running on the ovirt site.
It mentioned adding
#
Hey, been a few years since I looked at ovirt. 3 years probably and at the
time I was looking for compute and storage all in one -and was advised not to
basically. So Hyperconvergence is now a thing and want to try it out. I was
looking at the blog - up and running with ovirt 4.1, but it
While checking for some patches on one of my ovirt systems I found that
the ovirt-4.1-dependencies.repo no longer has a 3.8 version available.
I see newer versions but not sure if I just need to change the following
to point to it or upgrade to 4.2.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Edoardo Mazza wrote:
> Hi all,
> Scenario:
> 3 nodes each with 3 interfaces: 1 for management, 1 for gluster, 1 for VMs
> Management interface has it own name and its own ip (es. name = ov1, ip=
> 192.168.1.1/24), the same is for gluster
Hi all,
Scenario:
3 nodes each with 3 interfaces: 1 for management, 1 for gluster, 1 for VMs
Management interface has it own name and its own ip (es. name = ov1, ip=
192.168.1.1/24), the same is for gluster interface which has its own name
and its own ip (es. name = gluster1, ip= 192.168.2.1/24).
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Fred Rolland wrote:
> ovirt-engine/BLL.virt
>
> Seems to be a problem when building the XML, before sending to Vdsm.
>
>
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530261
I have chosen Gluster into the required field "oVirt Team";
ovirt-engine/BLL.virt
Seems to be a problem when building the XML, before sending to Vdsm.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>> I'm indeed missing even the create
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
>>
> I'm indeed missing even the create command on the VDSM... strange. Can you
> file a bug about this?
> Y.
>
Which Product/Component? ovirt-engine/General ?
Gianluca
___
Users
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> a system upgraded from 4.1.7 (with libgfapi not enabled) to 4.2.
> 3 hosts in a HC configuration
>
> Now I try to enable libgfapi:
>
> Before a CentOS 6 VM booted with a qemu-kvm line of type:
>
>
Hello,
a system upgraded from 4.1.7 (with libgfapi not enabled) to 4.2.
3 hosts in a HC configuration
Now I try to enable libgfapi:
Before a CentOS 6 VM booted with a qemu-kvm line of type:
-drive
On Aug 3, 2017 9:04 AM, "TranceWorldLogic ."
wrote:
Thanks Denis,
Can anyone help me to know when 4.1.5 will be release ? (release date).
We strive to release minor versions on a monthly cadence.
Y.
___
Users mailing
Thanks Denis,
Can anyone help me to know when 4.1.5 will be release ? (release date).
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 AM, TranceWorldLogic . <
tranceworldlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was going through gluster document it was talking about libgfapi, that
> gives better performance.
> And I also went through many bug description and comment and mail thread
> in ovirt group.
>
>
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:52 PM, TranceWorldLogic . <
> tranceworldlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was going through gluster document it was talking about libgfapi, that
>> gives better performance.
>> And I also
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:52 PM, TranceWorldLogic . <
tranceworldlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was going through gluster document it was talking about libgfapi, that
> gives better performance.
> And I also went through many bug description and comment and mail thread
> in ovirt group.
>
>
Hi,
I was going through gluster document it was talking about libgfapi, that
gives better performance.
And I also went through many bug description and comment and mail thread in
ovirt group.
But still not understood, how to enable libgfapi ?
Is it supported in 4.1 ? I am confuse.
Please help
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:32 AM, NUNIN Roberto
wrote:
> Hi kasturi
>
> >> Hosted Engine tab is visible only after hosted_storage and
> hosted_engine vm is imported to the >>cluster. Once the first node is
> installed, you will need to create a storage domain of
Hi kasturi
>> Hosted Engine tab is visible only after hosted_storage and hosted_engine
vm is imported to the >>cluster. Once the first node is installed, you will
need to create a storage domain of vmstore or >>data volume .
Data storage domain is already created and activated. I've also
Hi Roberto,
Hosted Engine tab is visible only after hosted_storage and
hosted_engine vm is imported to the cluster. Once the first node is
installed, you will need to create a storage domain of vmstore or data
volume . Once one of these storage domains are created, hosted_storage
and
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Sahina Bose wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 05:08 AM, Bill James wrote:
>>
>> I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1 on
>> centos7.2
>> and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2.
>> I created a
On 02/17/2016 05:08 AM, Bill James wrote:
I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1
on centos7.2
and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2.
I created a gluster volume using gluster cli and then went to add a
storage domain.
I created it with
I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1 on
centos7.2
and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2.
I created a gluster volume using gluster cli and then went to add a
storage domain.
I created it with Path ovirt1-ks.test:/gv1 and all works fine,
On 07/29/2015 05:54 PM, Joop wrote:
On 29-7-2015 13:59, Jorick Astrego wrote:
For RHEV I don't have an answer.
But for anyone that cares, we've been running oVirt 3.5 and GlusterFS
3.6 for about three months in production now. We run a Gluster
cluster and a seperate virtualization hosts
:*John Gardeniers [mailto:jgardeni...@objectmastery.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 04:30 PM
*To:* Matthew Lagoe; 'Donny Davis'
*Cc:* 'users'
*Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Seriously? I very explicitly said RHEV, not Ovirt.
On 29/07/15 09:10, Matthew Lagoe wrote
On 29-7-2015 13:59, Jorick Astrego wrote:
For RHEV I don't have an answer.
But for anyone that cares, we've been running oVirt 3.5 and GlusterFS
3.6 for about three months in production now. We run a Gluster cluster
and a seperate virtualization hosts cluster. The Gluster cluster is
domain.
On 29/07/15 09:31, Matthew Lagoe wrote:
Sorry my mistake I ment RHEV
*From:*John Gardeniers [mailto:jgardeni...@objectmastery.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 04:30 PM
*To:* Matthew Lagoe; 'Donny Davis'
*Cc:* 'users'
*Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Seriously? I
On 07/29/2015 02:24 PM, Joop wrote:
On 29-7-2015 13:59, Jorick Astrego wrote:
For RHEV I don't have an answer.
But for anyone that cares, we've been running oVirt 3.5 and GlusterFS
3.6 for about three months in production now. We run a Gluster
cluster and a seperate virtualization hosts
, July 28, 2015 2:15:12 AM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Hi All,
What information is available regarding the compatibility of Ovirt and
Gluster? Is there a combination known to be stable and if so, what are
the relevant versions? I am asking with respect to a production system
The feature I require is solid compatibility between Ovirt and
Gluster. We currently use RHEV and now learn that it is inherently, and
possibly quite deliberately, incompatible with the community versions of
Gluster.
On 29/07/15 08:18, Donny Davis wrote:
What feature is it that you need for
Of *John Gardeniers
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 04:06 PM
*To:* Donny Davis
*Cc:* users
*Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
No, not yet. I figured that I should be able to get better answers
here, as the Gluster list has been particularly poor for answers to
Ovirt related questions
No, not yet. I figured that I should be able to get better answers here,
as the Gluster list has been particularly poor for answers to Ovirt
related questions.
On 29/07/15 08:55, Donny Davis wrote:
One more question
Have you asked anyone on the gluster list?
On Jul 28, 2015 5:32 PM, John
Sorry my mistake I ment RHEV
From: John Gardeniers [mailto:jgardeni...@objectmastery.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 04:30 PM
To: Matthew Lagoe; 'Donny Davis'
Cc: 'users'
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Seriously? I very explicitly said RHEV, not Ovirt.
On 29/07/15 09:10
It's being considered, at least as an interim measure, in an effort to
obtain some stability while we look at other storage options.
On 29/07/15 08:41, Donny Davis wrote:
Are you switching to oVirt?
On Jul 28, 2015 5:32 PM, John Gardeniers
jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
What feature is it that you need for your production environment? I would
be looking for !required! features for the environment, and then which
versions are the most mature.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:07 PM, John Gardeniers
jgardeni...@objectmastery.com wrote:
That popular Linux company
result has not been described.
On 29/07/15 09:31, Matthew Lagoe wrote:
Sorry my mistake I ment RHEV
*From:*John Gardeniers [mailto:jgardeni...@objectmastery.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2015 04:30 PM
*To:* Matthew Lagoe; 'Donny Davis'
*Cc:* 'users'
*Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Thanks,
Raz Tamir
Red Hat Israel
From: John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
To: users users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 2:15:12 AM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Hi All,
What information is available regarding
*From: *John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
*To: *users users@ovirt.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, July 28, 2015 2:15:12 AM
*Subject: *[ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
Hi All,
What information is available regarding the compatibility of Ovirt and
Gluster
Are you switching to oVirt?
On Jul 28, 2015 5:32 PM, John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
wrote:
The feature I require is solid compatibility between Ovirt and Gluster.
We currently use RHEV and now learn that it is inherently, and possibly
quite deliberately, incompatible with the
One more question
Have you asked anyone on the gluster list?
On Jul 28, 2015 5:32 PM, John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
wrote:
The feature I require is solid compatibility between Ovirt and Gluster.
We currently use RHEV and now learn that it is inherently, and possibly
quite
: [ovirt-users] Ovirt and Gluster
No, not yet. I figured that I should be able to get better answers here, as the
Gluster list has been particularly poor for answers to Ovirt related questions.
On 29/07/15 08:55, Donny Davis wrote:
One more question
Have you asked anyone on the gluster list
have more questions, please ask
Thanks,
Raz Tamir
Red Hat Israel
*From: *John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
*To: *users users@ovirt.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, July 28, 2015 2:15:12 AM
*Subject: *[ovirt-users] Ovirt
I would stick with the same versions I see a popular Linux company putting
out.
On Jul 27, 2015 6:15 PM, John Gardeniers jgardeni...@objectmastery.com
wrote:
Hi All,
What information is available regarding the compatibility of Ovirt and
Gluster? Is there a combination known to be stable and
That popular Linux company uses versions with reduced features and
functionality, which have no direct comparison to the community versions.
On 29/07/15 08:04, Donny Davis wrote:
I would stick with the same versions I see a popular Linux company
putting out.
On Jul 27, 2015 6:15 PM, John
Hi All,
What information is available regarding the compatibility of Ovirt and
Gluster? Is there a combination known to be stable and if so, what are
the relevant versions? I am asking with respect to a production system,
not an experimental lab environment.
regards,
John
Hi Sahina,
the UI reports 2 Bricks down, as I replaced another one.
Gluster vol status is fine.
# gluster vol info
Volume Name: data
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: b7af7293-57d7-4dcb-b733-21474df371bd
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 2 x 3 = 6
Transport-type: tcp,rdma
Bricks:
Brick1:
Hi again,
problem seems to be solved - restarted all glusterd-services on all
nodes and now UI reports correctly.
Thanks, Frank
Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2015, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Frank Rothenstein:
Hi Sahina,
the UI reports 2 Bricks down, as I replaced another one.
Gluster vol status is
On 06/29/2015 06:50 PM, Frank Rothenstein wrote:
Hi,
I just added a gluster-node. I wanted to replace one brick of the data
domain. I did with gluster vol replace-brick old_brick new_brick
commit force and all gluster processes did well.
My Cluster volumes now shows this one old_brick down and
Hi,
I just added a gluster-node. I wanted to replace one brick of the data
domain. I did with gluster vol replace-brick old_brick new_brick
commit force and all gluster processes did well.
My Cluster volumes now shows this one old_brick down and does not
show the new_brick, where as gluster vol
59 matches
Mail list logo