IT was my hope that more of the experienced committers on Royale would help get
the emulation components to run and train the newcomers. Unfortunately, that
has not happened so far, and I don't have enough time to do all of it myself in
short order. I keep hoping our committers will step up
That’s a great discovery. Can you then build a small test case that reproduces
the problem so I can understand why it is hanging?
Thanks,
-Alex
From: Serkan Taş
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Date: Saturday, November 17, 2018 at 7:34 AM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re:
maybe others could respond to this. That was as is when I came. I think
something similar was in Flex mobile components, although at that time I
think it was done that way to avoid instantiation of views and help the
poor mobile performance at that moment
El sáb., 17 nov. 2018 a las 11:02,
OK, I understand now.
For one hand it's better than Flex SDK and other frameworks, because avoids
to load tons of code that I don't need all the time.
For another hand I will end up with final mxml with more code but it's OK.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
--
Sent from:
see "initComplete"
El sáb., 17 nov. 2018 a las 10:58, hferreira ()
escribió:
> With Flex I can use creationComplete with do stuff after the UI was
> rendered.
> What is the equivalent for jewel/Roayle ?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Royale is the equivalent for in Flex/Spark ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Hi Carlos,
OK, it's a Panel.
Thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Great example Carlos.
Thank you very much.
I will play around with Royale and I have a few question that I will put in
different threads.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
I saw initialView in every example in Royale.
This seems strange for me.
Why not put the component instance directly on mxml ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
OK, thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Thank you very much.
Now I understand the Express and Basic and Strands and Beads.
Express ends up to be more what Flex is about but Basic + Strands and Beads
it's the best way to go.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
I believe you could think like that like mx and spark, but probably going
deeper it can be a bit more.
I see this like that - If you jump and learn emulation components and how
to create and make them visible for your needs - You earn deeper knowledge
what is behind the stage. You will gain the
http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Hi Hugo,
This exactly how Royale works. It's just mark that following View is
initial. You have more such of a section in whatever component you
creating. For example each component had section "model" or "beads".
I personally like the idea from the very beginning and haven't seen any
strange in
Hugo,
I think you should take a look close to that [1]. I think it is really
important to understand from the very beginning what PAYG actually is.
It saves you a lot of time and makes your eventually contribution to the
project on a good quality.
[1]
Basic cannot work without Jewel. It is correct ?
Jewel it's like a UI implementation using Basic like mx ou spark for Flex,
correct ?
So, what happens if I'm using Jewel and at some point I would like to
completely change my UI aspect ?
Or Jewel is the first implement, a set of UI with a default
OK, thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Let me preserve thread :
I found out that namespace definitions in the beginning of file - in
application tag - causes compiler to hang.
e.g.
xmlns:comps="com.likya.pinara.comps.*"
When i remove these namespace definitions, than compiler goes on.
This workaround let me to continue a little
And the most important more of your code won't need as much changes.
> Yes. In a framework change perspective is the cheapest approach but for
> now is not there iet (let's see in a near future), meanwhile I will check
> Royale without emulation.
--
Sent from:
Applications have “initialize” and “applicationComplete”.
Components have “initComplete”.
> On Nov 17, 2018, at 1:02 PM, hferreira wrote:
>
> Code).
> It is normal ?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
How to add that cool debug toolbar to VS Code solution ?
Currently I have to do cmd + shift + p (macOS) to do a build-debug and then
I have to open the folder and then open the file on my browser.
I would like to:
1. Add that same toolbar
2. If possible when build, automatically open the
22 matches
Mail list logo
