On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 14:35 -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Hamish wrote:
Forwarding should (IMO) be implemented in such a way as the
FORWARDING mailbox should be used as the new return-path (Just
like if you forwarded an email from your MUA rather than with the
MDA).
Hello,
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I know there are some domains which use a 2 level tld zone. like .co.uk
which will never be included.
Is this not an TLD which has be to changed inside SA to a 2 level tld?
If I check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Hamish wrote:
Forwarding should (IMO) be implemented in such a way as the
FORWARDING mailbox should be used as the new return-path (Just
like if you forwarded an email from your MUA rather than with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gino Cerullo wrote:
On 27-Jul-06, at 4:32 PM, Hamish wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 17:25, Marc Perkel wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, July 25, 2006 18:51, Marc Perkel wrote:
SPF breaks email forwarding. My users use forwarding.
fair,
BG Mahesh wrote:
hi
We are moving our mailserver to a new machine. The old machine has
MailScanner+SA 2.6.x
The new machine has MailScanner+SA 3.1.4
How can I move the bayes file from the old machine to the new machine
and make sure it is SA 3.1.4 complaint?
Basically I want the new
I am suddenly facing a lot of image spams from a pretty effiecient
spammer now . The Ips he is using are not listed anywhere
All spams advertising stocks of HLUN.PK Am I alone facing this problem.
Also I found that the From header in all mails is a typical repeated
string
Like these
From:
Hi!
All spams advertising stocks of HLUN.PK Am I alone facing this problem.
Also I found that the From header in all mails is a typical repeated
string
No this is seen all over.
Anyone a nice rule?
Bye,
Raymond.
IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
headers are found at all?
Thanks
Ben
Tried that, and it didn't work. Even with file permissions set to 777, I
was seeing these log entries:
Jul 25 12:36:10 vps spamd[28501]: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp
lockfile /.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.vps.zinski.net.28501 for
/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Permission denied
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:56, Ben Wylie wrote:
IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
headers are found at all?
that will be brokken if that happens, your own mta should be there no matter
how brokken the sending client is
what you can do is trust less to avoid it,
Excuse my ignorance, but I have seen mention of raising scores for Bayes_99, Bayes_95, and I have several SPAM messages that are trigerring Bayes_50 but are getting a score of 0.00. What are the differences between these and how do I go about raising the scores? I can't seem to find any
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I write a ruleset to hit these froms
yes
attached a rule for this
--
Benny# header TWO_SUBJS ALL =~ /(?:^|\n)Subject:.*\nSubject:/s
# header DOUBLE_SUBJECT
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in
SA, so whatever.us.tt is what gets used.
--
Randomly
Oops they were single from headers , but from different mails
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 16:50 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I write a ruleset to hit these froms
On 7/28/2006 4:57 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in
SA, so
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt is listed as a two level
... us.tt is listed as a two level TLD in SA
I wasn't involved in that URIBL listing which brought this up... but, BTW, I'd
love to have that two level TLD in SA list handy. Therefore, can someone
point me in the right direction for where I could find SA's list of two level
TLDs?
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:27:09AM -0400, Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
I wasn't involved in that URIBL listing which brought this up... but, BTW,
I'd love to have that two level TLD in SA list handy. Therefore, can
someone point me in the right direction for where I could find SA's
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:21:11AM -0700, Ninja Dude wrote:
In other words, Bayes looks at it, says, I have no idea whether this is
spam-like or not. So 0 is the appropriate score for BAYES_50.
FWIW, BAYES_50 actually has a tiny tiny non-zero score so it'll show up as a
rule hit. Otherwise,
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
then about 2 more lines.
I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
Any rules that would help these?
Thanks.
Evan
Evan Platt wrote:
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI, then
about 2 more lines.
...
Any rules that would help these?
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this type
of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate
On 27-Jul-06, at 7:46 PM, Tao Lin wrote:
Hi, John
Now I understand what MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY mean. It means my email is
generated by Indy component. And I have some misuse of the Indy
component that it gen the html email is not so clean. Once I fix it,
my email score from 2.4 downto 0.5!
I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
figure out how to set up per-user Bayesian filtering. Obviously I need
to cause sa-learn to maintain a different database for each user. My
question is how do I get SpamAssassin to use the DB corresponding to the
recipient of
I just realized the question also applies to outgoing mail. Would that
be based on the senders DB? What about for relayed mail? Is there a
way to make it so that SA only gets invoked for incoming mail?
Joe Harvell wrote:
I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
Ben Wylie wrote:
IS there a way to stop all trusted being triggered when no received
headers are found at all?
Thanks
Ben
That should not happen in recent versions of SA.. What version are you on?
SA 3.1.x will only fire ALL_TRUSTED if all of the following are met:
1) there is at
From: Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, July 28, 2006 13:14, Ramprasad wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I write a ruleset to hit these froms
yes
attached a rule for this
I think he meant the cardiac.cardiac and adjudge.adjudge
From: Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your help, Theo Van Dinter!
Using your tip, I was able to find this on a web site here:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/Mail-SpamAssassin/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm.html
(which I post in cause someone in the
The bayesian filter seems super-delicate. If I run sa-learn on a
mailbox with more than about 200 messages in it, it gets killed, I'm
not sure why:
$ sa-learn --spam --dir Maildir/.spam/cur/
Killed
$
If sa-learn gets killed in the middle, it leaves a database that it
thinks is empty.
Before a
On Fri, July 28, 2006 19:28, Evan Platt wrote:
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
then about 2 more lines.
I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
Any rules
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW, BAYES_50 actually has a tiny tiny non-zero score so it'll show up as a
rule hit. Otherwise, people went crazy not understanding why there were no
BAYES_* hits.
Gee, I can take out my BAYES_50 tweak.
{^_-}
From: Yet Another Ninja [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/28/2006 4:57 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think that. us.tt
From: Maurice Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:08:42PM -0700, jdow wrote:
And after my playing around with whois one comes to the confusion or
conclusion that us.it is not a two level domain or else whois is very
broken. I vote for the former conclusion. If you play with the standard
spammer trick anything.us.it
From: Maurice Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think
From: Maurice Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
I'm not sure why you think
From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Maurice Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoth Theo:
Why? us.tt acts as a registrar (www.us.tt - joynic.com), dolling out
anything.us.tt to others, so we want to be able to deal with that.
Same as other country code.tt 2TLDs.
Quoth the Trinidad Tobago registrar, ttnic at http://www.nic.tt/ :
On Friday 28 July 2006 10:33, Joe Harvell wrote:
I have Postfix 2.2.10 and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. I have been trying to
figure out how to set up per-user Bayesian filtering. Obviously I need
to cause sa-learn to maintain a different database for each user. My
question is how do I get
38 matches
Mail list logo
