James Lay wrote:
I have almost 500 megs of swap. And Postfix and SpamAssassin are the
only things running on it. Thanks!
Swap is pretty much useless for anything but programs you need running
but rarely use. You can swap out a *tiny* bit of spamd, but that's
about it if you don't want
DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Updates are variable... they go in /var. Anywhere else wouldn't be
following FHS.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Daryl
The point is really moot. What files are in what directories doesn't
really matter. It seems the idea is that anyone reading all
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus
the SARE
Hi
I have some troubles getting good results using gocr on some of the pics
that came in.
Strangely Chris from the FuzzyOCR Plugin was able to scan them correctly
but we didn't find out why there's so much of a difference
I'm using gocr-0.40-3 on SuSE 10.1 and netpbm-10.26.12-5.4 (for
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have
decoder wrote:
decoder wrote:
decoder wrote:
Hello there,
I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
intentional obfuscations in the text don't make
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
The largest factor to take into consideration is how much mail SA will
be dealing with. Running a single child will be limiting, if you are
getting anything more than a few hundred mails per day that hardware
will be insufficient. You will either hit long delays or mail
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:10:59 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the
question, does spamassassin do any
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{^_-} Joanne, who has a bad habit if running numbers. And I note he
might be able to run two instances to get SOME benefit from
paralleling the DNS lookups.
Point conceded :-D
jdow That's DEADLY in political arguments when I bother to
From: Bjorn Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to
Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the
question,
Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to make it
easier for gocr):
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif
and converted to pnm:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
And here's what gocr -i ocrmail.pnm spits out in my case:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to
make it easier for gocr):
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif and converted to pnm:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
And here's what gocr -i
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:27 +0200, Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk.
When using amavisd-new a ramdisk. Ralf Hildebrandt has setup a small page
about it:
http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/amavisd_tmpfs.shtml
He says it gives some optimalization.
Regards,
Xander
From: Bjorn Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a
Ramprasad wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:27 +0200, Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this
jdow's plugged nickel's worthBased on the bad case I ran his
machine should do on the order of 10 to 30 seconds per email depending
on the speed of his processor. At 30 seconds per that gives him the
capacity, with delays to be sure, for 3000 emails per day. When they
come in batched there
jdow wrote:
But of the British it takes a Harry Potter to spell correctly.
(I know he's Canadian. But if carried too far British spelling
smells, or in the past tense is fishy, smelt.)
I know, like a sane person, Chris likes hockey (don't worry Chris, it
starts real soon), but WTH did he
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to make it
easier for gocr):
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif
and converted to pnm:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
And here's what gocr -i ocrmail.pnm spits out in my
From: Michel Vaillancourt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow's plugged nickel's worthBased on the bad case I ran his
machine should do on the order of 10 to 30 seconds per email depending
on the speed of his processor. At 30 seconds per that gives him the
capacity, with delays to be sure, for 3000 emails
For some reason I thought he was. If he's a United Statesian then whainheck
is he spelling British fashion?
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
But of the British it takes a Harry Potter to spell correctly.
(I know he's Canadian. But
Good
day.
I have
spamassassin working with MailScanner in a redhat linux machine.
Recently, we are receiving SPAM that claims to be from
some users that are on whitelist and, for that reason, spamassassin marks them
as NOT SPAM (user in whitelist rule scores -100).
What
can we do to
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
For some reason I thought he was. If he's a United Statesian then
whainheck is he spelling British fashion?
Maybe he's seeking a little class?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that our customer support emails have the first line
Hello,
Our OWA server sits inside of our network. I just tried sending an
email to a valid outside recipient. The email wasnt anything crazy
but here are the tests that were ran:
On Wed, August 9, 2006 16:14, Terry wrote:
Our OWA server sits inside of our network. I just tried sending an
email to a valid outside recipient. The email wasnt anything crazy
but here are the tests that were ran:
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=militarism.jpg
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Hello,
SA 3.1.4
exec /usr/bin/spamd -v -m 32 -D -q -u vpopmail -s stderr 21
I am using vpopmail installation, and use /user perfs, for /user bayes and
other user conf is stored in SQL.
Problem:
If a mail comes in, and no real vpopmail user is present (smtproutes), than
SA pick's a random real
Ramprasad wrote:
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=militarism.jpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to
* Gregory T Pelle wrote (09/08/06 15:14):
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:59:30AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
The point is really moot. What files are in what directories doesn't
really matter. It seems the idea is that anyone reading all the
documentation, and the wiki, should be able to discern what will go
where, in what order,
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 23:04 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails
with mails which contain some explaination and the original mail
as an attachment. The attachment of the mail
Gregory T Pelle wrote:
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that our customer support emails
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
Updates:
- added optimization changes by Theo Van Dinter
- added jpeg support
- added function image_named()
- added function image_size_exact()
- added function image_size_range()
- added function image_to_text_ratio()
- dhawal
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
I tested your mail here with the latest imageinfo.pm and it comes through
indeed. The exact same one in .gif (same text, same background) was detected
though. It was even my first and only
I had a similar, less expensive thought; Checking the global color
table in the header of all of the gif images in a particular message. I
tested a couple of spam cases and the GCTs are identical in all of my
limited number of test cases.
Logan Shaw wrote:
Looks like people have started to
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
I tested your mail here with the latest imageinfo.pm and it comes through
indeed. The exact same one in .gif (same text, same background)
was detected
though. It was even my
On Wed, August 9, 2006 16:39, Richard wrote:
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
--
Benny
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like Dear Jim
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe DEAR_SOMETHING
Reginaldo Bray Mendoza wrote:
Good day.
I have spamassassin working with MailScanner in a redhat linux machine.
Recently, we are receiving SPAM that claims to be from some users that
are on whitelist and, for that reason, spamassassin marks them as NOT
SPAM (user in whitelist rule scores
Reginaldo Bray Mendoza wrote:
What can we do to avoid this??.. is there another way we can secure our
whitelist users rather than use spamassassin's whitelist_from rule???
Use whitelist_from_rcvd or whitelist_from_spf instead of just
whitelist_from.
whitelist_from_rcvd takes both an address
Hi
i am reading the link http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
then the .pm file and do not have a plugins directory. where does the .pm
file go?
i assume the .cf goes in /etc/mail/spamassassin
and i edit v310.pre then restart spamd
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that sentence.
Richard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that
Hi there,
Server: qmail vpopmail simscan-1.2 spamassassin-3 clamav
Client: Win2k/XP with Office 2003
I've been trying to get Outlook 2003 to automatically deposit mail marked by
spamassassin as spam into its junk email folder. What I'm looking for is a
built-in junk filter rule for Outlook
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
That depends on what you mean by replaces.
i though sa-update updates the SA distro's bundled rules, but NOT any
additional
Matthew V wrote:
Hi there,
Hello.
Server: qmail vpopmail simscan-1.2 spamassassin-3 clamav
good
Client: Win2k/XP with Office 2003
not so good
I've been trying to get Outlook 2003 to automatically deposit mail
marked by spamassassin as spam into its junk email folder. What I'm
- Original Message -
From: Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
(just pulling this out of the other thread ... my bad)
Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup *plugin* updates as
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
That depends on what you mean by replaces.
i though sa-update updates the SA distro's bundled rules,
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it
doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like Dear
Jim
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe
I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
message. Investigation reavealed that cases have one thing in common:
these were all message/partial chunks of a longish transfer of some
document or other data.
Title: RE: HTML-tests good or bad?
ROFL!! I just saw this thread!
I haven't played hockey since January :( And still my spelling hasn't improved!
I am in fact, a product of the US skool system ;)
And if you're a Boston Bruins Hockey fan, today is a GREAT DAY!
Theo wrote (in part):
sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
channels (ie: bundles
of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
(requires a
certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
channel that I know
of is updates.spamassassin.org. (all
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Logan Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Logan Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for these?
Hi,
I think i've tried everything Bayesian isn't scoring, not only once,
never. Never any Bayes_XX score.
Here's the results for sa-learn --dump magic|grep token :
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 4795 0 non-token
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
Hrm. How much, if any, image processing is duplicated across the
imageinfo/OCR/fuzzyOCR plugins? It might be a benefit to merge them
and expose some options to control which tests are performed.
Well, for example with gif, FuzzyOCR first checks what
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by content-type, added various configuration options.
Feedback is welcome :)
Chris
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like Dear Jim
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done as a gateway to sa-update,
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert,
but it doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal
things like Dear Jim
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
Could the image-size calculation stuff from the ImageInfo plugin be
merged into this?
I was envisioning all of those tests in a single plugin, with
configuration options to control whether or not the OCR itself (fuzzy
or not) takes place and whether the
I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
message. ...
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
by sending a 70 MB video
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Expertsites, Inc. wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by content-type, added various configuration options.
I install the above plugin,
Mark Martinec wrote:
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
by sending a 70 MB video clip, and his Outlook Express
will happily do the dirty work for him, splitting a mail
into 190 chunks. What does a user know, he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic
bytes and not by
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic
bytes and not by content-type, added various configuration
options.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support
png, invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format
with
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
Could the image-size calculation stuff from the ImageInfo plugin be
merged into this?
I was envisioning all of those tests in a single plugin, with
configuration options to control whether or not the OCR itself (fuzzy
or not) takes
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that needs it.
Yes -- the decode run happens once and the result is stored in the
tree node/object
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that needs it.
Yes -- the decode run happens once and
On 2006-08-09, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I used to run SA on a 256 meg 66 MHz Pentium that was also the firewall.
It was erm ahm slow, VERY slow. But it ran. This was in the 2.6.3 days
give or take some.)
I run SA on FreeBSD on an IBM M-Pro dual PII-400 with 512MB RAM.
Sendmail, IMAP,
Mark -- can you mail a *real* sample? private mail would be fine.
--j.
Mark Martinec writes:
I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
message. Investigation reavealed that cases have one thing in
Justin,
Mark -- can you mail a *real* sample? private mail would be fine.
It is coming your way (private) in a minute or two.
It is a real sample, the only change I made is to
replace the From and To header, so that it looks like
a mail from me to you, subject: promotional video ...
Watch
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that needs it.
- Original Message -
From: Spamassassin List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Improved OCR Plugin with approximate matching
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See
-Original Message-
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:31 PM
To: Spamassassin List; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improved OCR Plugin with approximate matching
[snip]
According to google, libungif seems correct for yum... If
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
illiterate.
{O.O} So says the old fartess curmudgeonette.
- Original Message -
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's nothing stoping the SARE folks from publishing a single or a
bunch of channels and getting rid of RDJ in favor of sa-update if they
wanted to... There are some benefits either way I suppose, and I'm biased
towards sa-update of course. :|
Um,
From: Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theo wrote (in part):
sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
channels (ie: bundles
of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
(requires a
certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
channel that I know
of is
righting? is that the opposite of wronging? :-)
On Aug 9, 2006, at 7:19 PM, jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
I'm younger than the folks that REALLY learned to spell.
And I do wonder why I made that typo. Either of my parents would have
had my skin for doing that.
{O.O}
- Original Message -
From: John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent:
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
Sounds to me like it would be worth an entry in Bugzilla.
Loren
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
I'm younger than the folks that REALLY learned to spell.
And I do wonder why I made that typo. Either of my parents would have
had my skin for doing that.
{O.O}
*I* gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you'd done it on
purpose for illustrative
90 matches
Mail list logo
