I am running a qmail + simscan + spamassassin + clamav on a
centos 5.3.
Regards
there are many ways to do it...
you could try
@example.com
in your
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
might work... depending on some factors...
you could smtp reject above a certain score and do a
I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I
realize most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be
nice to get some real numbers to confirm it so since the Internet lacks
any real DNSBL comparisons that include Ham FP safety.
If you are looking for
(back from vacation ;)
BTW, could you add
tflags nopublish
to any rules? or use a T_ prefix on the rule names. that will ensure
the testing rules won't get into any published ruleset
accidentally. this is very important to avoid accidentally causing a
production-level DOS on the BL's
Tara Natanson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com
wrote:
Does anybody here know anything about the legitimacy of Constant
Contact http://www.constantcontact.com/anti_spam.jsp ?
Hello,
I work for Constant Contact. We take reports of spam very
I get junk from these guys all of the time, others that have followed
the 'opt-out' IMO just use it
to confirm an email address for sale to others, such as themselves.
Maybe I am just extra
paranoid, but marketers should just stick to a web search for people
that want to purchase from
them.
Lately, a few 419 scams have been slipping through to me, written in
French - I get two or three a week. It's sort of amusing to me, but
wondered if anyone is collecting them to write rules.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4 tagged_above=-999 required=4.5
tests=[BOTNET_SOHO=-0.1, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, McDonald, Dan wrote:
Lately, a few 419 scams have been slipping through to me, written in
French - I get two or three a week. It's sort of amusing to me, but
wondered if anyone is collecting them to write rules.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4 tagged_above=-999 required=4.5
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, McDonald, Dan wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m693d3d17
One thing that leaps right out at me is the encoded characters (e.g.
#3648;) in a text/plain body part. Does tis-620 provide for that?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
When Constant
Contact gets a clue and automatically requests an opt-in confirmation
for ALL email addresses uploaded in bulk by their customers then I'll
stop adding a a high score in SA.
The problem with that is that most of Constant Contact's customers are small
business that may have users
I'd be happy to see them. I'm working on updating the Advance Fee 419
ruleset and your samples would be welcome. Feel free to gzip up a mbox
and send it to me.
I have a ruleset at http://www.tradoc.fr/spamassassin/fraude_fr.cf that,
while it hasn't been actively updated for a while, still hits
After testing the khop rules for a few days, I noticed one oddity.
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
8
On 10/19/2009 10:11 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
After testing the khop rules for a few days, I noticed one oddity.
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
%OFHAM
Bowie Bailey wrote:
After testing the khop rules for a few days, I noticed one oddity.
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
-
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but Spamassassin
and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20 minutes just to
figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is trying to weed out
dunderheads like me from using their product. I swear I cannot understand
amadis wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but Spamassassin
and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20 minutes just to
figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is trying to weed out
dunderheads like me from using their product. I swear I
It would help to explain what operating system you are using, at what
point you are stuck at the installation, what you've read and what
you've tried.
Did you look at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/StartUsing ?
At 04:26 PM 10/19/2009, amadis wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty
All:
_IS_ there a Thunderbird plugin for SA? That would seem to be quite useful.
1) install perl for your platform (amadis: the perl language
interpreter is required for Spam Assassin)
2) install SA
3) install the (hypothetical) Thunderbird plugin
Then you can use SA to augment Thunderbird's
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 16:26 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but Spamassassin
and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20 minutes just to
figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is trying to weed out
SA is only for mail servers?! I
wish that had been made clear on the SA website. Even now looking at
the homepage and FAQ page I see nothing to that effect. But thank you
all who responded for clearing this up. I was beginning to think I must
have taken a stupid pill when I woke up this
At 04:42 PM 10/19/2009, you wrote:
Threats like that never help, and rarely yield any useful responses.
I love the people who make threats for free software.
If you don't fix this, I'm switching to competitor
For one, you get more bees with honey
Second, you're threatening to take away
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 16:50 -0700, Adriene Harrison wrote:
SA is only for mail servers?! I wish that had been made clear on the
SA website. Even now looking at the homepage and FAQ page I see
nothing to that effect. But thank you all who responded for clearing
As I said, server-side filtering
On Monday 19 October 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
amadis wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty capable with a computer but
Spamassassin and it's website have made me think twice. I took me 20
minutes just to figure out where this forum was. I feel like Apache is
trying to weed out
22 matches
Mail list logo
