On 11.08.10 13:52, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are
planning to move to Red Hat. I don't have much experience with Red Hat
(or Linux in general). Could you point me to some tips and documentation
about installing and running SA
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:51:19 -0400
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/11/2010 1:30 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettlermkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth.
There's a script to clean out
Hello,
I've run into an issue with a mailbox where large amounts of spam are
making their way through filters. The majority of these spam messages
receive SA scores of 0.3-1.6; for obvious reasons I cannot adjust the
filter sensitivity this aggressively. After reading through the docs
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:49:00 -0400
Tim Thorburn des...@arashidesign.com wrote:
The command I am
using is: sa-learn --spam /path/to/file This file currently has 153
spam messages;
if the file is a mailbox file you need to specify the format e.g. --mbox
however when the above command is
On 8/11/2010 7:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then
sa-update loses track of the file and
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta
rules, effectively discarding all
On 8/11/2010 10:32 PM, nonlin wrote:
Well I am not out of the Dog House yet.
So, by some miracle I was able to get yum to work and was able to use it to
update Spamassassion. I was so happy because this was the safest way to do
this. But yum didn't have ver 3.3 available so I was able to
On 8/12/2010 8:49 AM, Tim Thorburn wrote:
Hello,
I've run into an issue with a mailbox where large amounts of spam are
making their way through filters. The majority of these spam messages
receive SA scores of 0.3-1.6; for obvious reasons I cannot adjust the
filter sensitivity this
I've yet to hear anyone implementing SA for forms in a sensible manner..
Thanks for the feedback. If people have tried before it's unlikely
I'll do much better :)
It would make much more sense to me to just apply well known form spam
specific checks into your code. The standard captcha,
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta
rules, effectively discarding
On 8/12/2010 11:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the
actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them.
That means, stale meta rules in stock will
Thanks Bowie,
I ran it, and it seemed to update, though it gave me no info as it did, + it
did restart the service. But this has still not fixed my problem.
I really don't think we will be on the right track until someone tell me to
start posting some of my configuration file. I would have dun it
On 8/12/2010 4:40 PM, nonlin wrote:
Thanks Bowie,
I ran it, and it seemed to update, though it gave me no info as it did, + it
did restart the service. But this has still not fixed my problem.
I really don't think we will be on the right track until someone tell me to
start posting some of
Dear friends,
I don't mean to be condescending but it look like no one is really reading
my posts.
I had run sa-update, /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004 owner is root and I ran
sa-update as root. and it looked like it updated. and I just ran it again
now as per these latest instructions, rebooted
14 matches
Mail list logo
