Well I have a bit more info on this now.
The problem goes away IF I put the aliases as usernames into
the password file
For example:
tedm - in password file
eatme - not in password file
/etc/mail/aliases
eatme: tedm
problem happens.
tedm - in password file
eatme - ALSO in password file
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:14 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Well I have a bit more info on this now.
The problem goes away IF I put the aliases as usernames into
the password file
What you've demonstrated is that this is an MTA problem whose
implications depend critically on when and how the
On 6/16/2010 1:15 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:14 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Well I have a bit more info on this now.
The problem goes away IF I put the aliases as usernames into
the password file
What you've demonstrated is that this is an MTA problem whose
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:27 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
OK after rereading the docs for spamass-milter and your explanation
I think the light dawned.
Yep, your view looks right. I can't say more because once I got a look
at sendmail configuration and saw the huge chunks missing from the
On 15.6.2010 21:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I thought I knew SA but I have a strange one here that is
probably due to a configuration directive set wrong, but I don't
know what it is.
System is running sendmail and SA 3.2.5
mails sent to user e-mail addresses get
On 15.6.2010 21:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I thought I knew SA but I have a strange one here that is
probably due to a configuration directive set wrong, but I don't
know what it is.
System is running sendmail and SA 3.2.5
mails sent to user e-mail addresses get
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
System is running sendmail and SA 3.2.5
How are they glued together?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
spamass-milter
Ted
On 6/15/2010 11:55 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 15.6.2010 21:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
OK I thought I knew SA but I have a strange one here that is
probably due to a configuration directive set wrong, but I don't
know what it is.
System is running sendmail