On Sun, July 26, 2009 04:43, snowweb wrote:
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
bayes_auto_learn 1
But when I examine the message headers,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.4
Is
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 04:43, snowweb wrote:
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
bayes_auto_learn 1
But when I examine the message headers,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,TVD_RCVD_IP
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote:
Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was
interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to
analyse the messages, let alone to learn from them.
sa-learn --dump magic
I've now trained bayes with
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote:
Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was
interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to
analyse the messages, let alone to learn from them.
sa-learn --dump magic
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
0.000 0258 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0160 0 non-token data: nham
try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
so if less then 1000 in diff is fine
if more then 1000 adjust
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
0.000 0258 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0160 0 non-token data: nham
try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
so if less then 1000 in diff is
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
0.000 0258 0 non-token data:
nspam
0.000 0160 0 non-token data:
nham
try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
so if less then 1000 in diff is
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
0.000 0258 0 non-token data:
nspam
0.000 0160 0 non-token data:
nham
try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes
db
so if less then 1000 in diff is
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
One can also use
bayes_sql_override_username spam
in local.cf, if the bayes is in a SQL database. I have that, and there
seems to be no difference if I use -u or not.
I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn
snowweb wrote:
I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn
--username=user --dump magic and it seemed to give the same result as the
default user. I tried various different users (even made some up!) but it
didn't complain - still gave me the same dump.
Sorry, got mixed up. In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
use_bayes 1
Is there anywhere else that I need to switch this on since it does not
appear to be doing bayesian testing at all for any messages.
--
View this message in context:
snowweb wrote:
Sorry, got mixed up. In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
use_bayes 1
Is there anywhere else that I need to switch this on since it does not
appear to be doing bayesian testing at all for any messages.
check your sa-learn --dump magic
SA won't activate bayes until it has
12 matches
Mail list logo
