> On Nov 14, 2014, at 11.41, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 14.11.2014 um 17:11 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
>> one characteristic that appears to be pretty consistent is the age of the
>> domain name that a given message references [from header, envelope sender,
>> ptr record for rem
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Actually, the OPs notion is an interesting one.
From the point of view of someone who administers a lot of systems
and mailing lists, I end up getting multiple copies of lots of
messages. I've been thinking for a while about how to implement
anti-s
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:24:05 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >I have an experimental botnet detector that looks for multiple
> >messages with similar subjects that come from many different
> >countries (as determined by geolocating the relay IP.)
> isn't this what DCC is about?
Similar id
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
one characteristic that appears to be pretty consistent is the age of
the domain name that a given message references [from header, envelope
sender, ptr record for remote mailservers referenced in received
headers, etc]. quite often,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Actually, the OPs notion is an interesting one.
From the point of view of someone who administers a lot of systems and
mailing lists, I end up getting multiple copies of lots of messages. I've
been thinking for a while about how to implement anti-sp
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
if they would have that much ressources postscreen even without RBL's would
not be that effective because they don't wait until their turn to speak most
of the time and so have no chance for delivery - the 13407 pregreets this
month are "hurry up i hav
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:45:49 -0500
Miles Fidelman wrote:
From the point of view of someone who administers a lot of systems
and mailing lists, I end up getting multiple copies of lots of
messages. I've been thinking for a while about how to implement
anti-spam rules based on receiving multiple
Am 14.11.2014 um 17:11 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
one characteristic that appears to be pretty consistent is the age of the
domain name that a given message references [from header, envelope sender, ptr
record for remote mailservers referenced in received headers, etc]. quite
er
>> for a few minutes, as it seems that when these messages reach us, they're
>> only minutes away from being matched by network tests [this is what i asked
>> postfix-users about]. i'm interested to hear from folks on this list
>> regarding this i
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:58:46 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
[David]
> > I don't agree with that contention. Botnet operators have so many
> > resources at their disposal that I doubt they care about or even
> > notice any sort of delaying or tarpitting.
[Harald]
> they don't because they have not m
Am 14.11.2014 um 14:43 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:35:34 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
*but* it makes a ton of troubles for large *legit* sending clusters
which often after a 4xx reject handover that mail to a different node
and so get again a 4xx
With very little loss of e
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:35:34 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> *but* it makes a ton of troubles for large *legit* sending clusters
> which often after a 4xx reject handover that mail to a different node
> and so get again a 4xx
With very little loss of effectiveness, you can modify the algorithm
so
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:45:49 -0500
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> From the point of view of someone who administers a lot of systems
> and mailing lists, I end up getting multiple copies of lots of
> messages. I've been thinking for a while about how to implement
> anti-spam rules based on receiving mu
Actually, the OPs notion is an interesting one.
From the point of view of someone who administers a lot of systems and
mailing lists, I end up getting multiple copies of lots of messages.
I've been thinking for a while about how to implement anti-spam rules
based on receiving multiple copies
Am 14.11.2014 um 13:04 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:39:13 +0100
Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:35 AM, John Hardin
wrote:
if you're in a business environment you may have an uphill battle
with managing expectations, to wit: email is *not* intended to be
i
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:39:13 +0100
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:35 AM, John Hardin
> wrote:
> > if you're in a business environment you may have an uphill battle
> > with managing expectations, to wit: email is *not* intended to be
> > instant messaging - and may run up aga
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:35 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> if you're in a business environment you may have an uphill battle with
> managing expectations, to wit: email is *not* intended to be instant
> messaging - and may run up against the brick wall of management not being
> willing to delay email
only minutes away from being matched by network tests
[this is what i asked postfix-users about]. i'm interested to hear from
folks on this list regarding this idea, as well as possible alternatives
to dealing with this phenomenon.
It's called greylisting and many people (including my
ssages to the content filter for
a few minutes, as it seems that when these messages reach us, they're only
minutes away from being matched by network tests [this is what i asked
postfix-users about]. i'm interested to hear from folks on this list regarding
this idea, as well
> > when local dns server is working there must only be one single nameserver
> > in resolv.conf and options rotate nust not be enabled
>
On Friday March 18 2011 04:04:23 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> In the SA case, due to some issues with the underlying DNS Perl module,
> IIRC the "first nameserv
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 02:38 +0400, Hamad Ali wrote:
> > I take it you no longer want to disable network test? ;)
>
> yeah, thank you for all the help; also thanks to other folks that
> told me how to disable network tests (it helped me see the need of
> network tests).
Grea
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 01:49 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:30:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > Don't do that. Run a local, caching, non-forwarding DNS server. And make
> > sure this server (most likely 127.0.0.1) is the first nameserver entry
> > in your /etc/resol
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:30:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> Don't do that. Run a local, caching, non-forwarding DNS server. And make
> sure this server (most likely 127.0.0.1) is the first nameserver entry
> in your /etc/resolv.conf.
when local dns server is working there must only be one s
> Subject: Re: how to disable network tests?
> From: guent...@rudersport.de
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:04:59 +0100
> Did you clear your local (forwarding) DNS's cache between these runs?
> Hmm, or maybe both are essentially suffer
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 01:43 +0400, Hamad Ali wrote:
> > [...] Does your caching DNS act as a forwarder?
> >
> > Don't do that. Run a local, caching, non-forwarding DNS server. And make
> > sure this server (most likely 127.0.0.1) is the first nameserver entry
> > in your /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> Ye
> Subject: RE: how to disable network tests?
> From: guent...@rudersport.de
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:30:16 +0100
> The new timings strongly suggest there indeed are some network or DNS
> issues. Installing a local caching nameser
Oh, and FWIW...
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 22:17 +0400, Hamad Ali wrote:
> > Regarding my problem, I am still investigating the cause of the
> > network delay. I have installed a DNS cac he server, and speed did
> > increase for "cached" entries. [...]
This is precisely what you should have posted i
have installed a DNS cac he server, and speed did
> increase for "cached" entries. Sometimes, I get ~1.4 seconds (time(1))
> for email scanning with network enabled, and 0.1 seconds when network
> tests are disabled. I tried other DNS servers beside my ISP's, and
> they al
ow).
Regarding my problem, I am still investigating the cause of the network delay.
I have installed a DNS cache server, and speed did increase for "cached"
entries. Sometimes, I get ~1.4 seconds (time(1)) for email scanning with
network enabled, and 0.1 seconds when network tests are d
rious network problem ;).
The OP did ask about disabling all network tests which would imply
that he had some reason to suspect the latter.
You pretty much either know it's a network problem, or you're guessing.
And if you know it's a network problem, it's a short step to kno
single core.
> If the box is mostly waiting for net-test results
> that's a config issue (or serious network problem ;).
>
> The OP did ask about disabling all network tests which would imply
> that he had some reason to suspect the latter.
You pretty much either know it'
d ask about disabling all network tests which would imply
that he had some reason to suspect the latter.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:05:47 +0400, Hamad Ali
wrote:
> However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes ~10
> seconds!). Except that I dunno how to do it the neat way.
disable plugins that do the hard work of testing dnsbl is plain simple in
*.pre files
spamassassin 2
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:39:58 -1000
"Warren Togami Jr." wrote:
> If it is taking 10 seconds per message then you likely have
> some kind of serious misconfiguration.
It depends on the hardware, there's plenty of SOHO hardware where 10s
would be considered snappy.
On 3/11/2011 10:05 AM, Hamad Ali wrote:
hi folks --- everything seems working like chicken. I'm loving SA so far.
However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes ~10
seconds!). Except that I dunno how to do it the neat way.
Will the tests be disabled if their score is
Hamad Ali wrote:
>hi folks --- everything seems working like chicken. I'm loving SA so
>far.
>
>However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes ~10
>seconds!). Except that I dunno how to do it the neat way.
>
>Will the tests be di
other poster said, 10s for network tests seems excessive. There's
probably something wrong.
More specifically, he is probably trying to use a moribund DNS test
site. He should review what he is using, testing each of the sites
to make sure they are all valid.
{^_^}
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:51:44 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> ...your email is so time-critical that you can't wait an extra ten
> seconds for it to be delivered?
On a busy server, a ten-second latency in scanning mail could kill you...
As another poster said, 10s for network
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Hamad Ali wrote:
hi folks --- everything seems working like chicken. I'm loving SA so far.
Glad to hear it!
However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes ~10
seconds!).
...your email is so time-critical that you can't wait an extra t
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 00:05 +0400, Hamad Ali wrote:
> However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes
> ~10 seconds!). Except that I dunno how to do it the neat way.
That seems a little bit excessive. Are you sure this is due to DNS
queries?
If so, it would appear y
hi folks --- everything seems working like chicken. I'm loving SA so far.
However, I would like to disable all network tests (each mail takes ~10
seconds!). Except that I dunno how to do it the neat way.
Will the tests be disabled if their score is 0? I know that would lead into
disablin
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:28:27PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> btw, I think this is already possible using the shortcircuit plugin.
> Just use rule priorities to run the non-net rules first, and
> shortcircuit if they are sufficient.
Currently DNS queries are sent no matter what, but it's fixabl
gt; On 10/30, Michael Parker wrote:
>> > > I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
>> > > affect the outcome.
>> >
>> > Why?
>>
>> To reduce the network load on my server which is one of the hosts of the
>
On 30/10/2010 4:28 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
rsync? to check mail?
Hrm, not a bad idea for the basis of a bayesian filter.
Daryl
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:28:09 +0200
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-10-30 9:56, RW wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
> > dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
> >> internet from not running unnecessary tests o
On 2010-10-30 9:56, RW wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
internet from not running unnecessary tests on every instance of
spamassassin seems worth doing.
You are also wasting resources by
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:23:00 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> But the total amount of bandwidth and processing time saved on the
> internet from not running unnecessary tests on every instance of
> spamassassin seems worth doing.
You are also wasting resources by putting the round-trips on
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:23:00AM -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 10/30, Michael Parker wrote:
> > > I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> > > affect the outcome.
> >
> > Why?
>
> To reduce the network load o
On 10/30, Michael Parker wrote:
> > I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> > affect the outcome.
>
> Why?
To reduce the network load on my server which is one of the hosts of the
DNSWL.org list?
> Assuming a reasonably fast connection ne
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:42 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
> affect the outcome.
Why?
Assuming a reasonably fast connection network checks are basically free.
They are kicked off at the start of a scan and the
I'd like to see spamassassin only run network tests when they might
affect the outcome.
For example, if you run all non-network tests, and at that point an email's
score qualifies as spam, and then you run all the non-spam network tests
(hitting whitelists), and it still qualifi
On 04.08.09 16:39, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> And it seems AWL really is the problem. Here are the relevant passages from
> another Email, which only got enough points to be identified as Spam because
> it was both in DCC and Razor.
>
> 5.0 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/
isable the Auto-Whitelist? Or simply use higher scores
for "RAZOR_CHECK" etc. ?
Bye
Stefan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-Tests---Rule-Files-Directories-tp24750149p24818157.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 18:15 -0700, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> > Evidence that it's not working? Show us some SA headers. In this case, a
> > spam sample that triggered DCC, cause the Report header does show the
> > rule's score.
Hmm, I wasn't clear enough. :) I meant an identified spam, whe
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-Tests---Rule-Files-Directories-tp24750149p24774184.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
figuration option that can be tweaked for better performance?
Bye
Stefan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-Tests---Rule-Files-Directories-tp24750149p24774136.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 19:30 -0700, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
> Hello
A Nabble user with a name. Hooray! :)
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> | spamassassin
I suggest running the spamd daemon, and then change that to call spamc
rather than plain spamassassin. That eliminates the start-up penalty f
irectory under /var/lib is used. Can I delete the old files in
/usr/share/spamassassin or are they still needed? Why does
SpamAssassin place the updates rules in a different directoy than the
one in which the original rules are installed?
Bye
Stefan
--
View this message in context:
http://www
question is, where can I see a list of all the network tests
that SA can perform, or performs by default?
I ask this because the only network tests I want are URIBL and Spamhaus,
and Spamhaus checks are done by rblsmtp before SA or qmail get their
hands on mail.
After enabling network tests the
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:27:39AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How to enjoy the high scores of --local, but still enjoy network tests?
> Too bad there's no way to tell it to always use set 0 without needing to do
> How inflexible.
Since set 0 sets a score of 0 for network rul
How to enjoy the high scores of --local, but still enjoy network tests?
Man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says
If four valid scores are listed, then the score that is used
depends on how SpamAssassin is being used. The first score is used
when both Bayes and network tests are
On Monday 18 February 2008 11:25:21 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:56 -0600, Rob Wright wrote:
> > Greetings all.
> >
> > I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting
> > network tests run.
> >
>
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:56 -0600, Rob Wright wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting
> network
> tests run.
>
> spamassassin -D --lint yields this in the plugins section:
The debug switch implies
Greetings all.
I'm using 3.2.4 on Debian Etch. I'm not sure that I'm actually getting network
tests run.
spamassassin -D --lint yields this in the plugins section:
[5786] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 from @INC
[5786] dbg: razor2: local tests only, skip
Hellow All, is there a detail explanation about the spamassassin's
network tests?
I have only found http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingNetworkTests,
it says something like "*URIDNSBL: *These perform a high number of DNS
lookups" but without a detail about what tests are
You have configured amavisd-new to tell SA not to run network tests. If you
want amavisd-new to stop telling SA not to run network tests, set:
$sa_local_tests_only = 0;
Gary V
Sorry, I didn't see the other posts, so this is redundant. Make sure you
reload amavisd-new after making chang
My network tests are not implemented on my server.
If I run spamassassin manually from command line on a message I see the
network
filters in play but when I examine messages that have gone through my
Xserve no network tests
are performed. I checked /etc/amavisd.conf and the line with
Quoting Kelsey Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I meant (and I just checked) 'sa_local_tests_only' is set to 0.
> But the network tests still are not implemented.
Make sure it's also not commented out. Some installations have it commented out
by default.
Jeff C.
Crap.Sorry about that.
I meant (and I just checked) 'sa_local_tests_only' is set to 0.
But the network tests still are not implemented.
Regards,
Kelsey
On Sep 2, 2007, at 7:39 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Quoting Kelsey Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My network tests are not i
Quoting Kelsey Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My network tests are not implemented on my server.
> If I run spamassassin manually from command line on a message I see
> the network
> filters in play but when I examine messages that have gone through my
> Xserve no network
My network tests are not implemented on my server.
If I run spamassassin manually from command line on a message I see
the network
filters in play but when I examine messages that have gone through my
Xserve no network tests
are performed. I checked /etc/amavisd.conf and the line with
ticular rDNS lookups.
(I use SA as a "helper application" to compliment my own spam filter)
Rob McEwen
PowerView Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original message-
From: Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:02:43 -0500
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
RE: How To Turn Off ALL Network Tests (except DCC & Razor)
In SpamAssassin, how do you turn off ALL Network tests, including ALL DNS and
**all** rDNS lookups, but leave DCC & Razor running?
I commented out the following line:
# loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
An
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
RE: How To Turn Off ALL Network Tests (except DCC & Razor)
In SpamAssassin, how do you turn off ALL Network tests, including ALL DNS and
**all** rDNS lookups, but leave DCC & Razor running?
...
If there anything ELSE that should be done to te
::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x8eae7e8)
[67350] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC from @INC
[67350] dbg: dcc: local tests only, disabling DCC
3.1.6+ disables network tests during lint as they don't need to be run
to confirm a working config.
If you suspect problems
hello list:
I just set up a box who is:
FreeBSD 6.1
Perl 5.8.7
Spamassassin 3.1.6
and when I: spamassassin -D --lint, I get the following:
[67350] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL from @INC
[67350] dbg: plugin: registered
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x
Speaking of network tests...
Other than "traditional" IP-address-based RBL lookups, SURBL/URIBL lookups, and
network traffic for Razor, DCC, etc... is there anything ELSE for which a test
requires network traffic which depends on a someone else's remote server that
still ru
rbs admins are going to allow you the rsync.
I hope i can help you ??
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ramprasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 11:31
An: Stefan Klewer
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Network tests slowing down spamassas
> Hi,
> i think the best way to reduce the network traffic regarding to the network
> test is to do all network test locally.
> we are serving many list locally. For example spamhaus (commercial
> agreement),spamcop (one time fee), njabl, sorbs , cbl.abuseat, dsbl (all
> free). We are using a rbl
Ramprasad wrote:
> Hi,
> SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
> 200k mails an hour at peak times )
> But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
> network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
> out.
> Prob
On 7/13/2006 11:06 AM, Ramprasad wrote:
So what is the best way to reduce network traffic. We are already
getting the sbl-xbl lists from spamhaus so as to serve those lists
locally , can I get any other lists locally ? Commercial agreements
also are ok.
Many/most lists will provide rsync ac
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 11:17 -0400, Craig Morrison wrote:
> Ramprasad wrote:
> > Hi,
> > SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
> > 200k mails an hour at peak times )
> > But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
> > network and all hell
Ramprasad wrote:
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I
Ramprasad wrote:
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I have enabled all ki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
"Pierre Thomson" writes:
>>
>> In 20_dnsbl_tests.cf there are some non-scored tests:
>> __RCVD_IN_NJABL, __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL, __RCVD_IN_SORBS etc. Are these
>> the culprits? I can't disable them by scoring zero, since they
ule.
> >Setting it to a score of 0 disables the rule entirely, and it will not be
> >queried.
>
> While optimizing my new SA 3.1.0 installation, I set the scores for many of
> the RCVD_IN_* network tests to zero. However, the DNS lookups keep right on
> going; here's a ca
ptimizing my new SA 3.1.0 installation, I set the scores for many of the
RCVD_IN_* network tests to zero. However, the DNS lookups keep right on going;
here's a capture of the DNS lookups generated by a single email:
11:00:10.820999 AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD.56639 > 64.72.64.10.domain:
On Friday, March 18, 2005, 8:40:45 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> 3) experiment to see which specific network tests are slow by setting
> their score to 0 one at a time.
In particular try setting the score of URIBL_SBL to 0
since its style of SBL lookups is significantly slower than
SURBL lookup
Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
Hi guys,
I have the Spam Assassin 2.63 with Amavis installed in my box and now I am
trying to enable network tests with SpamcopURI.
Its working but the delivery of the messages is very slow when network tests
are enabled, so I´d to disable it.
Any ideas to make the
Hi
guys,
I have the Spam
Assassin 2.63 with Amavis installed in my box and now I am trying to enable
network tests with SpamcopURI.
Its working but the
delivery of the messages is very slow when network tests are enabled, so
I´d to disable it.
Any ideas to make
the deliver of
A friend who wishes to remain anonymous forwarded me this patch
and note:
> Jeff, Saw the thread on sa-users list about using SURBL without other
> networks
>
> Attached is a ugly patch which I think might do the trick.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
sa30
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:31:34 AM, DNI Department wrote:
> We have rbldnsd running of a private IP with BIND/DNS forwarding calls to
> the various SURBL lists to that name server. We are approved to rsync the
> data from surbl; and that's been working well.
> Our primary mail server is on a
Greetings Martin:
We have rbldnsd running of a private IP with BIND/DNS forwarding calls to
the various SURBL lists to that name server. We are approved to rsync the
data from surbl; and that's been working well.
Our primary mail server is on a physical server running several network
applicati
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 9:53:19 AM, DNI Department wrote:
> Greetings:
> SURBL does not appear to work with network tests totally disabled (i.e.
> using --local in the spamd startup).
It may be worth noting that disabling network tests at the
command line with --local and "ski
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 9:57:45 AM, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Are you running a caching name server locally on the machine? This helps
> alot in reducing the DNS traffic for RBLs and URI RBL's.
> I normally process emails in under 2 seconds using couple of RBL's,
> pyzor and all of the subl.or
ator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
DNI Support Department wrote:
Greetings:
SURBL does not appear to work with network tests totally disabled (i.e.
using --local in the spamd startup).
No network tests:
0.1 to 0.6 seconds to score emails as spam or ham
Approximately 90% a
Greetings:
SURBL does not appear to work with network tests totally disabled (i.e.
using --local in the spamd startup).
No network tests:
0.1 to 0.6 seconds to score emails as spam or ham
Approximately 90% accuracy on tagging spam correctly
Approximately 2% false
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 9:34:15 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> DNI Support Department wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to enable network tests for just SURBL (we have a local,
>> kept up to date with rsync, copy)?
> One possible problem with doing this is that it will swi
DNI Support Department wrote:
Is there a way to enable network tests for just SURBL (we have a local,
kept up to date with rsync, copy)?
One possible problem with doing this is that it will switch you to the
network score sets giving you lower scores for other tests. Without the
other network
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
