Le 23/02/2019 à 01:42, David B Funk a écrit :
IIWY I'd just redefine the HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_XX rules in the form
body __HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 eval:html_image_only('2400','2800')
meta HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 __HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 && !L_O365_USER
That's one way, but given that HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 is a
On 2/22/19 4:37 PM, David B Funk wrote:
> Is there a rule "score" syntax that allows you to use the score assigned
> to an existing rule to calculate the value assigned to another rule?
>
> Specifically what I'm trying to do is to negate the "damage" a
> particular rule does for messages that
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019, RW wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:37:30 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk wrote:
Is there a rule "score" syntax that allows you to use the score
assigned to an existing rule to calculate the value assigned to
another rule?
...
What I want to do is to create a local rule:
meta
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:37:30 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk wrote:
> Is there a rule "score" syntax that allows you to use the score
> assigned to an existing rule to calculate the value assigned to
> another rule?
...
> What I want to do is to create a local rule:
>
> meta L_HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28_FIX (
Is there a rule "score" syntax that allows you to use the score assigned to an
existing rule to calculate the value assigned to another rule?
Specifically what I'm trying to do is to negate the "damage" a particular rule
does for messages that meet particular local criteria.
For example:
