On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:34:46 -0500
Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com wrote:
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
http://mx1.webtent.net/test.msg
http://mx1.webtent.net/test2.msg
The first one now also hits razor ... can't say one way or another
about how it hit earlier, but I'd suggest double-checking
Christian Brel wrote:
header __HOTMAIL_SPX1 ALL =~ /Received\:.{1,30}hotmail\.com/i
body __HOTMAIL_SPX2 /http\:\/\/groups\.yahoo\.com/
meta HOTMAIL_SPAM_GY (__HOTMAIL_SPX1 __HOTMAIL_SPX2)
score HOTMAIL_SPAM_GY 0.0
If I may...
To match only Received headers:
header __HOTMAIL_SPX1
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:32:31 +
Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
header __HOTMAIL_SPX1 ALL =~ /Received\:.{1,30}hotmail\.com/i
body __HOTMAIL_SPX2 /http\:\/\/groups\.yahoo\.com/
meta HOTMAIL_SPAM_GY (__HOTMAIL_SPX1 __HOTMAIL_SPX2)
score HOTMAIL_SPAM_GY
On Saturday January 30 2010 06:17:14 Juergen Heberling wrote:
All my userprefs are stored in SQL so I dont want a ~/.spamassassin
directory.
(My earlier version (3.1.7) did not attempt to do this.)
I'm running spamd from rc.conf with spamd_flags=-Q -x -d -m 10
The attempt to create this
Am 30.01.2010 04:27, schrieb Andy Dorman:
Today (Friday) around 1600 GMT, Jan 29, we experienced a large drop
(almost 50%) in spam connections. And since then we have seen anywhere
from 25% to 40% less spam volume than is normal.
Anyone else see something similar? From what we have seen,
2010/1/30 Andy Dorman ador...@ironicdesign.com:
Today (Friday) around 1600 GMT, Jan 29, we experienced a large drop (almost
50%) in spam connections. And since then we have seen anywhere from 25% to
40% less spam volume than is normal.
Anyone else see something similar? From what we have
People,
perhaps its simple to be done, but I personally would like to know the ways to
get rid of something like this:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: marty rizin g suppe r socio logy mason ing
Date: Friday 29 January 2010
From: Cheap Tamiflu on www.ra97.com
On 30/01/2010 13:35, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
People,
perhaps its simple to be done, but I personally would like to know the ways
to
get rid of something like this:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: marty rizin g suppe r socio logy mason ing
Date: Friday 29 January
From: KÄrlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:35:26 +
People,
perhaps its simple to be done, but I personally would like to know the ways
to
get rid of something like this:
Use pastebin and save the entire message including the headers instead
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:51:18 Mike Cardwell wrote:
By forwarding the email the way you have, your email client has stripped
out most of the useful header information. Try pasting the message
including the full set of headers into http://spamalyser.com/ or
http://pastebin.com/ or similar
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
Retrain the message correctly in Bayes. Bayes will catch on to this
after a few times. The subject alone should be a strong enough clue
for bayes (I get BAYES_80 on this partial sample), so it looks like
you are doing only autolearn and
From: KÄrlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:16 +
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
Retrain the message correctly in Bayes. Bayes will catch on to this
after a few times. The subject alone should be a strong enough clue
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:35 +, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
People,
perhaps its simple to be done, but I personally would like to know the ways
to
get rid of something like this:
Apparently putting the spam's payload in the personal name part of the
From: header is as old a trick as putting
The Postfix program
users@spamassassin.apache.org: host mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136] said:
552 spam score (10.4) exceeded threshold (in reply to end of DATA command)
Karlis,
That's what the list said about my reply to you. I guess the (I was
going to write that
Am 30.01.2010 16:48, schrieb Jeff Mincy:
From: K�rlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:16 +
On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
Retrain the message correctly in Bayes. Bayes will catch on to this
after a few times.
On Saturday 30 January 2010 15:48:36 Jeff Mincy wrote:
BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_FIVETEN_SPAM,RCVD_IN_NIX
SPAM,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3,BOTNET,BOT
NET_BADDNS
Botnet/FIVETEN/NIXSPAM/UCEPROTECT are additional rules added.
-jeff
On 30/01/2010 17:14, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
I couldn't figure out how to get an unadulterated version of the
message from the spamalyser.com link you posted in a previous message.
I tried this
wget -O - -q http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/original.txt
pastebin has a simple way to
On 30.1.2010 19:14, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
in the Raw Message tab you can get the plain message
(http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/raw)
It's not raw message, it has a line number on each row.
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
You may be recognized soon. Hide.
signature.asc
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 01:08 -0500, Alex wrote:
Is this order documented anywhere?
man spamassassin
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FrontPage
Internal Server Error
Err, yeah. Same for http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NoSuchPage and
any other non-existent page it seems. Not nice,
On Saturday 30 January 2010 16:55:54 Dale Carstensen wrote:
The Postfix program
users@spamassassin.apache.org: host mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]
said: 552 spam score (10.4) exceeded threshold (in reply to end of DATA
command)
Karlis,
That's what the list said
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:25:15 +0200
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 30.1.2010 19:14, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
in the Raw Message tab you can get the plain message
(http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/raw)
It's not raw message, it has a line number on each row.
Click on
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:59:10 -0500
Jared Hall jh...@tbi.net wrote:
2) Here are some ruleset extractions that might help you get over the
hump. Comment if you must but be advised that I usually ignore them,
good or bad.
{snip}
Thank you for taking the time to post them here - appreciated.
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 12:59 -0500, Jared Hall wrote:
1) Probably a good idea to remove hotmail.com, livejournal.com and whatever
else suits you from the 25_uribl.cf ruleset. The line probably says:
uridnsbl_skip_domain hallmark.com hinet.net hotbar.com hotmail.com
I haven't seen an
These rules may be useful for taking care of Hotmail offenders.
I believe the RelayCountry plugin can address that also, in
a broad brush fashion.
# Ruleset: jared_head.cf
# Description: Jared's rules for SpamAssassin
# Applicability: Southeastern US; service-oriented companies
# Version: 01.021
From: Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann ilike...@bornefeld-ettmann.de
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:14:10 +0100
Am 30.01.2010 16:48, schrieb Jeff Mincy:
From: KÄrlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:16 +
On Saturday 30 January 2010
From: KÄrlis Repsons karlis.reps...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:20:23 +
On Saturday 30 January 2010 15:48:36 Jeff Mincy wrote:
BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_FIVETEN_SPAM,RCVD_IN_NIX
I ran yum update on my FC11 machine a couple of days ago, and now I'm
getting nightly cron errors:
plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): syntax error at (eval 84) line 1,
near require Mail::SpamAssassin:
plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): syntax error at (eval 148) line 1,
near
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 12:16 -0800, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
I ran yum update on my FC11 machine a couple of days ago, and now I'm
getting nightly cron errors:
Would be nice and maybe even helpful to know, what command(s) that cron
job executes, don't you think? :)
plugin: failed to parse
wow, based on the subject alone, I thought my SA had missed a very strange
spam :)
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
I ran yum update on my FC11 machine a couple of days ago, and now I'm
getting nightly cron errors:
plugin:
Matija Nalis wrote:
Also note that SARE Ninjas are long gone - see main page
http://www.rulesemporium.com/. So nobody could fix those rules even if they
thought it was a good idea (and at least some people are not convinced it is
a bad idea); and even if the rules could be fixed, still at
Hi,
I just upgraded from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0.
I have the following custom header in my local.cf:
add_header all Tokens _TOKENSUMMARY_\nHammy: _HAMMYTOKENS(5)_\nSpammy:
_SPAMMYTOKENS(5)_
This always worked in 3.2.x, and resulted in a header like:
X-Spam-Tokens: Tokens: new, 67; hammy, 79; neutral,
Hi,
I installed my mail server using ISPConfig3 on Ubntu9.10 Server...
I'm interested in using the two-level spam treatment configuring SPAM tag
level,SPAM tag2 level and SPAM kill level...
The server works perfectly but the mail that it receives don't show the
effects of the spamassassin's
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 23:37 +0100, angela vulpio wrote:
I'm interested in using the two-level spam treatment configuring SPAM
tag level,SPAM tag2 level and SPAM kill level...
Sounds like amavisd-new to me. Yes, amavis does invoke SA on its own
using the API, and does not need spamd (the vanilla
Angela,
I installed my mail server using ISPConfig3 on Ubntu9.10 Server...
I'm interested in using the two-level spam treatment configuring SPAM tag
level,SPAM tag2 level and SPAM kill level...
The server works perfectly but the mail that it receives don't show the
effects of the
34 matches
Mail list logo
