Jari Fredriksson wrote:
You need to prepare a valid looking email message from the text the web
app produces. It needs all the required headers before the actual body
of text to work. You may need to study SMTP RFC's to get it right, the
simple looking headers like Date: and Received:
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
Would this really help?
Could you tell us a bit more about your problem itself?
The reason I ask is: the mailbody is a very small part of what is
commonly used for antispam measures. Header is added afterwards,
IP is not yet known, HELO is not known, no
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:17:10AM -0700, Gnanam wrote:
Can SpamAssassin be used to test spam score of .html, .txt file extension
types, that is email body/content part of the email message?
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc
and feed this into SA.
How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any
standard/rule for creating a complete email message that
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc
and feed this into SA.
On 17.06.10 05:02, Gnanam wrote:
How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any
standard/rule for
On 6/17/2010 8:02 AM, Gnanam wrote:
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc
and feed this into SA.
How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any
standard/rule
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 05:02 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc
and feed this into SA.
How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any
We are getting a ton of this type and it scores low because there are no
received headers. What is this type of mail? I do not recall seeing
these in the past.
Thanks,
RCR
At 05:18 17-06-10, Matt Kettler wrote:
The best docs would be the RFC standards:
RFC 2822 Internet Message Format
RFC 822 (obsoleted by above, but sometimes useful for understanding the
history of the format, making intent clearer.)
RFC 2822 obsoleted by RFC 5322.
Regards,
-sm
On 6/17/10 10:38 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We are getting a ton of this type and it scores low because there are
no received headers. What is this type of mail? I do not recall seeing
these in the past.
its coming from you then :-(
or, your mail server is stripping out or not adding
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/17/10 10:38 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We are getting a ton of this type and it scores low because there are
no received headers. What is this type of mail? I do not recall
seeing these in the past.
its coming from you then :-(
or, your mail server is stripping
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/17/10 10:38 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We are getting a ton of this type and it scores low because there are
no received headers. What is this type of mail? I do not recall
seeing these in the past.
its coming from you then :-(
or, your mail server is stripping
On 6/17/10 11:31 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I just checked our spam reports and this rule never hits. It is not
locally generated email either or I can not find any coming from us.
This is an strange issue and I am not where to begin to determine what
is doing this.
if you have an insecure
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/17/10 11:31 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I just checked our spam reports and this rule never hits. It is not
locally generated email either or I can not find any coming from us.
This is an strange issue and I am not where to begin to determine
what is doing this.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
The original email did not hit the NO_RELAYS rule but subsequent runs
through do hit this rule and it isn't on all email.
This sounds to me like you are 'resending' the mail from a local address
to your mail server, rather than 'feeding' the original
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
The original email did not hit the NO_RELAYS rule but subsequent runs
through do hit this rule and it isn't on all email.
This sounds to me like you are 'resending' the mail from a local
address to your mail server, rather
On 17.6.2010 9:19, Gnanam wrote:
BTW, what does PGP mean that I found from your signature?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.
O, it is excellent
To have
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Hmmm, this mail came in and went straight to the users inbox. 1. Postfix
--- 2. Amavis ( Spamd/Clamd) --- 3. Postfix --- 4. Dovecot-deliver
So the problem is somewhere during the 2 --- 3 or step 3 or 4. Step 4 it
is unlikely since Deliver simply
Hello all,
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA). I'm
not at all an expert with spamassassin, and I'm having some difficulty
finding what this rule is about and what to do about it.
Any
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, gwilodailo wrote:
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA). I'm
not at all an expert with spamassassin, and I'm having some difficulty
finding what this rule is about
the rule is flagging the fact that the servers are using
non-assigned address space.
On 6/17/2010 2:19 PM, gwilodailo wrote:
Hello all,
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA).
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
get us added to lists, but Michael stated then, check the blacklists to
see how to get removed. as if we are already on a list. We are not.
Back to the main issue.
Here is an example pastbin. http://pastebin.com/mJqRPzkv
I found this message in
Hello Randy Ramsdell,
Am 2010-06-17 10:38:08, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
We are getting a ton of this type and it scores low because there
are no received headers. What is this type of mail? I do not recall
seeing these in the past.
Hehehe... sounds like a new customer of me...
His
23 matches
Mail list logo
