Hello Jered
Thanks for your answer!
# cat /etc/debian_version
8.10
# dpkg -l spamassassin
ii spamassassin 3.4.0-6 all Perl-based spam filter using text
i doint think that i have mixes releases installed.
# cat sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.5.0 _
Case study...
Well-known MTAs and SA itself allow (do not reject, do not flag) e-mails with
absent or empty "To" header.
If I receive one such snail mail, I know it is not for me, and I know it is
unwanted commercial advertisement that fills the mailbox and litters the floor.
RFC 822, page 42,
On 20180206 16:56, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 2/6/18 2:47 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote:
I know the definition of spam is very subjective and dependent on your
particular the mail flow along with the expectations of the recipients.
Back when I was in-house counsel at MAPS, Paul (Vixie) and
Hi Maurizio,
What version of Debian are you running, and which spamassassin package do you
have installed?
Useful commands:
# cat /etc/debian_version
# dpkg -l spamassassin
If you have mixed releases installed, please also provide the contents of
/etc/apt/sources.list.
Regards,
--Jered
On 2/6/18 2:47 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote:
I know the definition of spam is very subjective and dependent on your
particular the mail flow along with the expectations of the recipients.
Back when I was in-house counsel at MAPS, Paul (Vixie) and I came up with this
definition of spam
Hello
Please i have here today the messages from Spamassasin, please can you give
me here any information how to fix this.
r@mail:/etc/spamassassin# spamassassin -lint
Feb 7 00:41:47.028 [27945] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from
@INC):
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Mail
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:38:42 -0500
Alex wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:44 AM, David Jones wrote:
ustomer's compromised accounts.
> >
> > Leave out the RCVD_IN_BRBL rule above and change the
> > RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT score to 1.4 to keep things the same.
>
> If you think the RCVD_IN_BRBL rul
>
> I know the definition of spam is very subjective and dependent on your
> particular the mail flow along with the expectations of the recipients.
>
Back when I was in-house counsel at MAPS, Paul (Vixie) and I came up with this
definition of spam:
“An electronic message is “spam” IF: (1)
I know the definition of spam is very subjective and dependent on your
particular the mail flow along with the expectations of the recipients.
On 02/06/2018 02:06 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Kris Deugau wrote:
Alex wrote:
These phishes we've received were all from otherwise t
Hi,
>>> whitelist_auth *@bounce.mail.salesforce.com
>>> whitelist_auth *@sendgrid.net
>>> whitelist_auth *@*.mcdlv.net
>>
>>
>> I've seen enough spam sent through all three - both by way of whole
>> apparently spammer-owned accounts and cracked-but-otherwise-legitimate
>> accounts - that I would n
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Kris Deugau wrote:
Alex wrote:
These phishes we've received were all from otherwise trusted sources
like salesforce, amazonses and sendgrid. These are examples that I
believe were previously whitelisted because of having received a phish
through these systems but have no bee
On 02/06/2018 01:28 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
'bb.barracudacentral.org')
tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL_2eval:check_rbl_sub('brbl',
'127.0.0.2')
meta
Alex wrote:
These phishes we've received were all from otherwise trusted sources
like salesforce, amazonses and sendgrid. These are examples that I
believe were previously whitelisted because of having received a phish
through these systems but have no been disabled.
whitelist_auth *@bounce.mail
On 2018-02-05 09:12, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2018-02-05 16:53:
I don't think that will apply will it because it will be looking up
something like 1.2.3.4.bb.barracuda.blah which isn't cached.
the first qurry can make a qurry with very low ttl, so it would not be
cach
Hi,
> ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
>
> header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
> 'bb.barracudacentral.org')
> tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
>
> header __RCVD_IN_BRBL_2eval:check_rbl_sub('brbl',
> '127.0.0.2')
>>>
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:50:13 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> At present the closest you could get to that is to run two different
> SA installs having different rulesets (before and after), but there's
> no supported way to have the second pass include the first pass's
> score.
> Summarizing the
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, fe...@kngnt.org wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a postfix + amavis + dovecot setup, with spamassassin running both as amavis
plugin and dovecot "before" stage sieve filter. The reason for this setup is
that I want to reject mail that is obviously spam as soon as possible (done
Ironically, Gmail's spam filters have filtered every single one of the emails
in this thread. :-\
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
L
On 02/06/2018 10:38 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:44 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 02/05/2018 09:07 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
'bb.barracudacentral.org')
tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:44 AM, David Jones wrote:
> On 02/05/2018 09:07 PM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
>>>
>>> header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
>>> 'bb.barracudacentral.org')
>>> tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
>>>
>>>
Hi everybody,
I have a postfix + amavis + dovecot setup, with spamassassin running both as
amavis plugin and dovecot "before" stage sieve filter. The reason for this
setup is that I want to reject mail that is obviously spam as soon as possible
(done in amavis) but, as users are also able to m
On 02/05/2018 09:07 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
'bb.barracudacentral.org')
tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL_2eval:check_rbl_sub('brbl',
'127.0.0.2')
meta
On 2018-02-05 22:55, Philip wrote:
> So lately I'm getting LOTS of emails coming directly though the filters so
> most likely time to investigate how to create one.
>
> The subject is always 'hey'
>
> Subject: hey
>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:07:40 +0300
> From: Darya Message-ID: <8f35b00
David Jones skrev den 2018-02-05 15:09:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl',
'bb.barracudacentral.org')
tflags __RCVD_IN_BRBL net
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL_2eval:check_rbl_sub('brbl',
'127.0.0.2')
meta
24 matches
Mail list logo
