Daniel Aquino wrote:
I setup Bayes and whitelist db paths in my local.cf
The whitelist db created succesfully but the bayes_* db's did not...
More information please... Just saying that it doesn't work isn't very
helpful.
Before we can help you, we need the two basic pieces of information:
Daniel Aquino wrote:
I really don't know if I can extract emails from Outlook 2003 into a
standard mbox format...
Maildir is the preferred format. You can extract emails from Outlook,
but Outlook and Exchange tend to rewrite portions of the message which
makes this less than ideal for SA's
Daniel Aquino wrote:
run these commands as the defang user.
Would it be bad to use root because defang is not a real user..
spamd will not run as root. If you try it, it will switch to
nobody.
You can deal with this two ways:
If your mail accounts are owned by real users on the system,
Daniel Aquino wrote:
1) What (exactly) did you do?
# local.cf config file at this url
http://pastie.caboo.se/60756
What user is SA running as? What are the permissions on the bayes
directory?
drwx-- 2 defang defang 4096 2007-05-11 10:48
/var/spool/MD-Databases/
2) What
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
sa-update
Usage info is located where?
Most common usage is:
$ sa-update
Or, if you want to see what it's doing:
$ sa-update -D
Unless you are adding extra channels or doing something strange with it,
you shouldn't need more than that.
--
Bowie
Grant Peel wrote:
I have not turned on bayes, is it critical (to catching spam)?
Bayes is not critical, but it can be very useful. For best results, I
suggest you do this:
Manually train the Bayes db with hand-sorted ham and spam at least until
you get to the 200-ham/200-spam limit. After
Matthias Haegele wrote:
Bowie Bailey schrieb:
Grant Peel wrote:
I have not turned on bayes, is it critical (to catching spam)?
Bayes is not critical, but it can be very useful. For best
results, I suggest you do this:
ACK. It can kick the spam over the treshold which is maybe
StarkRavingCalm wrote:
Hello.
I am new to SpamAssasin. I have configured my new Sendmail server to
use Spamassassin and have tested with the usual commands:
spamassassin -D /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-3.1.8/sample-spam.txt
I want to test how the messages will look when delivered, so I can
StarkRavingCalm wrote:
Bowie,
Thank you for the reply. What I would like to do is to test it by
letting it pass thru so I can see how it would arrive in the user's
inbox.
Then configure the MTA to accept and deliver mail for a test user and
send him some mail. You can send the mail either
Grant Peel wrote:
1. sa-update. After wrestling with a number of required modules, I
ran sa-update with the --checkonly option, but it did not return any
messages. I then ran it using only the switch --updatedir. It created
a couple of what appear to be accounting files, and a new
Grant Peel wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grant Peel wrote:
1. sa-update. After wrestling with a number of required modules, I
ran sa-update with the --checkonly option, but it did not return
any messages. I then ran it using only the switch --updatedir
Matt Kettler wrote:
If you want a top x rules list, sa-stats can do that for you:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
It will parse a spamd logfile and report the most-frequently used spam
and nonspam rules (and you can configure how many it will list for
each)
I was
NFN Smith wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
It's in your RDJ config file. My config is in /etc/rulesdujour/ and
the
file is called config. The line in question:
SA_DIR=/etc/mail/spamassassin
That's where it should save the files it downloads.
I checked the code of rules_du_jour, and the
Adam Lanier wrote:
Peter Russell wrote:
Sorry last question - seems the parent company is doing spam checks
and adds the spam score to the headers.
How could i add/change the second condition for a spam score
greater than 10.00 ?
the header is X-Spam-Score: ***
Mark Adams wrote:
Ok, Fair enough.. I will change this listing to a whitelist_from_rcvd
as I assume this list is farmed by spammers. (Should be using that
always of course!)
Header below.
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hopnet.hopkins.co.uk ([10.0.0.23]
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam.
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
Hi!
bit offtopic, but maybe it's easy and someone is able to drop me the
*magic* snippet of code:
My logile looks like:
Mar 23 10:15:55 admin05 spamd[6084]: spamd: result: Y 5 -
AWL,BAYES_00,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_MESSAGE,LOGINHASH2,MIME_HTML
Mark Adams wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:06:51AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
Can you post your whitelist rule and the headers from an example
message?
Hi, Apologies for delay I did not see this message. I am still having
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Cliff Stanford wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score:
0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's
where the GA set it... its
Mark Adams wrote:
Thanks, It is using both directories. It appears that it isn't
subtracting the 50 points that it is supposed to when it is
whitelisted? Do you know if this setting is changeable?
Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
Can you post your whitelist rule
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi There,
SA 3.1.7-1.
I have setup openprotect http://saupdates.openprotect.com/
Ever since I set it up my whitelists have not worked, these are
located in /etc/spamassassin
I thought that spamassassin checked both of these directories for
rules, Am I correct?
I upgraded my SA from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8. I ran --lint with no problems and
then restarted the daemon. SA is working, but I'm seeing the following
errors in my log when SA starts up:
spamd[16137]: Can't locate DBD/mysql.pm in @INC ...
spamd[16137]: Can't locate Tie/Cache.pm in @INC ...
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:29:30AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
spamd[16137]: Can't locate DBD/mysql.pm in @INC ...
spamd[16137]: Can't locate Tie/Cache.pm in @INC ...
spamd[16137]: Can't locate Tie/Cache.pm in @INC ...
spamd[16137]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted
René Berber wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
The FuzzyOCR installation docs only list DBD::mysql as required if
you are using it for the hash database and I've got that set to use
digest_db.
FuzzyOCR.cf:
# 2 ... use digest_db w/digest_hash import (see requirements
René Berber wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
No, I'm using the latest development build of 3.5.1 from
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads.
I upgraded to 3.5.1 from 2.3b less than a month ago.
Perhaps you didn't upgrade everything, the precise location of the
error you
Scott Lockwood wrote:
Is that per user? So, if I nuke the whitelist, this should go away?
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 17:37 +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
USER_IN_WHITELIST !
Keep in mind that this is not referring to the auto whitelist. This is
a hit from one of the whitelist_from or
Jon Armitage wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the
headers to the email and not change the email in any other
way.
Look at the options for report_safe in your local.cf. I think this
John D. Hardin wrote:
WTF, over?
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:55:22 -0800
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Bowie Bailey wrote:
This has been discussed a few times. The short version is that
this list is hosted by apache.org. They spam scan posts to their
mailling lists and they aren't interested in making changes to
accomodate a single list
David Cary Hart wrote:
As a violent crime victims advocate, I might be overreacting to this
issue. OTOH, I can write, with absolute certainty, that anyone using
any of the services from childsafenetwork.org is opting in for a
considerable volume of commercial spam (from hoodia to credit
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:49:25AM -0600, Larry Starr wrote:
Not having run sa-update before, I copied my /etc/spamassassin
directory to /tmp, to play it safe and ran sa-update using the
/tmp/spamassassin directory as the updatedir (Nothing happened!):
[17203]
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
SA doesn't succeed in blocking some email (lately are many!)
expecially that email with pharmaceutical contents, where the name is
disguised and the link are changed adding then a comment for
obtaining the right link to digit in the address bar of the browser
Jim Maul wrote:
Andy Figueroa wrote:
As an occasional, long-term Thunderbird user, and using a reasonably
current version, 1.5.0.9, TB doesn't even have a built-in show
header feature. It can be added with a buggy extension called View
Headers Toggle Button, which doesn't show long
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 07:15:39 +, Nigel Frankcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
body Test_01 /remove \\*|\%|\!\/i
score Test_01 4.0
describe Test_01 Test remove asterisk for URL spams
and oops #2 the | doesn't work as expected :-/
This does tho...
Clay Davis wrote:
At the moment, I am looking for a rule to score this type of spam.
As I understand it... which is limited... the Bayes check has minimal
success on this... true? Thanks,
If you manually train your Bayes DB, you can have a fair amount of
success with these types of Spam.
Clay Davis wrote:
Bowie,
sorry for my lack of knowledge... is this a rule or other technique?
re,
Clay
On 2/2/2007 at 9:12 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
At the moment, I am looking for a rule to score this type
Add the following line to your user_prefs so that it adds the report
to the email regardless of spam status.
add_header all Report _REPORT_
By default, only spam messages have the report.
Bowie
z3r0 wrote:
I did but didn't see any of that in message header pressing ctrl F3
in OE...
Maciej Friedel wrote:
On 02/01/07 z3r0 wrote:
Depending on the level of access you have to your Linux box I'd
suggest writing them in joe or vi from the command line. linux
can get very picky about line breaks in files created in windows.
I can't lint anything, I just have a CPanel
Clay Davis wrote:
I am looking for some advise on which rules to apply:
Where are the guidelines for (not) applying rules like antidrug.cf?
I see the header stipulates that it is not intended for v3.0 and
higher. If these stipulations exist, are they always found in the
comments of each
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darn. I thought that might be the problem. Well, back to square one.
You are right, this is not the right list for amavisd questions, but
where do you draw the line?
If the question is about rules, scoring or plugins, ask it here. If the
question is about markup and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amavis uses SA's config file for rules, scores, and plugins. Just
keep in mind that it may be looking in a non-standard place for the
config depending on your setup.
Amavis adds some extra scoring on top of the SA score and does it's
own markup. These
Kelson wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
If you are going to try this, you will definately want to check
word boundaries like this:
header BAD_WORDS Subject =~ /\bbadword\b/i
The \b on either side will ensure that you don't match the string
as part of another word. (Anyone been
Chris Santerre wrote:
From: sergio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello spamassasin_list,
I want filter messages with some bad words. How can configure yhe
SA to do that? Thanks.
Its not really meant to do it, but you can. You first right a rule to
match bad words in the subject
Alexander Veit wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Forwarding is not a good idea, it adds and or changes the headers in
the mail.
Forward as attachment(s) could be a solution since original mail
headers are kept intact. I've asked a similar question on this list
some days ago, but nobody could
Alexander Veit wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[...]
Not really. It's actually a fairly good system if you have an IMAP
server.
You create IMAP folders for spam and ham. These can be shared or
individual for each user. The users then copy any mis-categorized
mail to these folders
Tony Guadagno wrote:
I guess i don't understand, you say that Rewriting the subject is
ultimately the responsibility of the MTA., but SA has this option,
so that means that it is SA's responsibility...right?
It depends on how you call it. If you call SA directly, then yes, it does
the
Tony Guadagno wrote:
I see, yes, I am calling SA directly, no Amavis etc involved..
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/21/2006 9:37 am
Tony Guadagno wrote:
I guess i don't understand, you say that Rewriting the subject is
ultimately the responsibility of the MTA., but SA has
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
How about you just post the section that it FP'd on. Then we can
all enjoy the party.
Not sure which section it is, but here's the whole shebang.
Oddly enough, it seems to match on the word ALUMNI.
--
Bowie
Noah wrote:
SA 3.1.7
FreeBSD 4.11
Hi there,
I am trying to get better understanding as to why spamassassin is
behaving the way it is.
So I see that autolearn=no. I thought by default autolearn is turned
on. I dont have this turned off in the system-wide configuration nor
the user
Jess Mooers wrote:
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 18,
2006:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:23:31PM -0600, Jess Mooers wrote:
Does anyone know of a cf ruleset that will address this, or
another way to stop it.
Chasing the subject of the day is futile.
itdelany wrote:
Hi all :)
My Setup is Postfix - Amavis - SpamAssassin running on ubuntu linux
6.06, I have this entries on my /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
# Set the threshold at which a message is considered spam (default:
5.0) #
required_score 7.0
But this is ignored, and I think
Brad Baker wrote:
We would like to add a spam report to the body of emails identified as
spam to make troubleshooting false positives easier. For instance:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 26, 2006 3:57PM
Subject: [spam] Buy ED Pills Now
Bowie Bailey wrote:
For documentation of the configuration options, try this page instead:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.ht
ml
The URL wrapped... Try this one:
http://tinyurl.com/3r4xa
--
Bowie
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:19:54PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
For documentation of the configuration options, try this page
instead:
The URL wrapped... Try this one:
http://tinyurl.com/3r4xa
Also acceptable:
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
That works too
R Lists06 wrote:
The numbers you need to look at are the false positives on your own
incoming mail. Look at the FP rate at each score level (i.e. how
many legit messages get mistagged with that score or higher,
whether in absolute terms or in percentages) and decide whether
it's
JJ Johnson wrote:
Can Spamassassin be configured to do host testing on forwarded
messages?
I have an email account hosted on a server running Spamassasin. I
also forward email from another host that doesn't run any spam
filtering software to the same email address. I can receive a
LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Dec-2006, at 13:35, Robert S wrote:
spamassassin --debug --lint 21 | less
I went with
# spamassassin -D --lint 21| grep -i dcc
[85448] dbg: config: read file /usr/local/share/spamassassin/25_dcc.cf
[85448] dbg: plugin: registered
David Morton wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Additionally, this channel's bundle includes a pre file that loads a
bunch of plugins, some of which that there's a good chance you don't
really care to have running, like HashCash (and for many Pyzor)...
all these are loaded:
Actually,
Karl Auer wrote:
It might be a bad idea, but I've set the score for BAYES_00 to zero.
It seemed to me that the only emails (other than VERY short ones)
that ever got a zero Bayes rating were spams :-) and the -4.9 that
BAYES_00 gives by default seemed more than excessive.
Anyway, my
Robert LeBlanc wrote:
My mistake, then; thanks for the clarification. I suppose what we
need, then, is something like a TX record for helping to identify
outbound mail servers.
That already exists. It's called SPF.
--
Bowie
John Rudd wrote:
JamesDR wrote:
SPF already does this
poorly.
We need something that actually works.
And what would you do differently? An SPF record is basically just a list
of valid mail servers for a domain plus a bit of information about how
strict the domain wants to be
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Halid Faith wrote:
I use spamassassin3.1.7
I go through some mails.
I see a mail in /var/log/spamd.log as below Wed Dec 6 13:33:49 2006
[4484] info: spamd: result: Y 15 -
EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,FRONTPAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART,
leemansvg wrote:
I'm running spamassasint --lint and it comes up saying that its only
doing local tests. I've enabled dns and I am connected to the
internet. I've also enabled razor, dcc, and pyzor in the
spam.assassin.perfs files. Does anyone have an idea where I might
have a
Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Monday, Dec 4th 2006 at 23:34 -0500, quoth Theo Van Dinter:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:12:26PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I have some spam getting through that has USER_IN_WHITELIST. I go and
look and sher nuff, the From address is there in the email column of
Bazooka Joe wrote:
rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare
rules?
thx
-bazooka
ps I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.4
pps below are
Bazooka Joe wrote:
Thx Bowie
That fixed rdj.
But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still using RDJ
for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel configuration.
--
Bowie
NFN Smith wrote:
I'm working on a series of rules to find obfuscated words in subject
lines that have been misspelled by adding an extra character (often a
repeated letter) to a word. For certain words, it seems to be
appropriate to assume that if they're misspelled in that way, it's
René Berber wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bazooka Joe wrote:
Thx Bowie
That fixed rdj.
But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still
using RDJ for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
So, let me get this straight:
-
This is how I see the work of amavis+spamd+clamd:
1. As I see it amavis talk to spamd (spamassassin) and clamd (ClamAV)
via appropriate sockets or TCP ports.
In my case -
To clamd via
Jason Frisvold wrote:
On 11/29/06, Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after sa-update runs, restart spamassassin and it will use the new
rules in /var/lib/spamassassin.
I have this as a cron job:
30 3 * * * sa-update spamassassin --lint
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
Markus Braun wrote:
Hello,
i tried to create a cron job to add spam messages as spamemails.
The following command :
0 1 * * * vmail sa-learn --spam
/var/opt/vmail/.info/oliver/Maildir/.spam/cur *.*
But i get this retourn:
archive-iterator: readdir found no mail in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jason Little [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just wrote my own rule
Called it wrotesub.cf
header LR_WROTE_SUBSubject =~
/\bwrote\b\:/i describeLR_WROTE_SUB
Wrote in Subject
score LR_WROTE_SUB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 01:27:47PM -0800, Steve Berg wrote:
I have started to receive a LARGE amount of spam with the subject
line of someone's name wrote:. Inside the email is a stock
tip with different stocks...
Yep.
Has
Kurt Buff wrote:
Nope - it's not that.
Looking through my syslog more closely reveals that I'm getting 'SA
TIMED OUT' messages all over the place, and referring to rules as
well as Bayes. So, I'm just as confused as ever, and don't know
what's going on.
More analysis needed, I suppose,
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
header TO_BOUNCES To =~ /bounces\@/i
description TO_BOUNCES Whitelist mail to bounces mailbox
score TO_BOUNCES-6
I really hate to be a pain, but how would a add a criteria for the
subject line as well, so that ONLY messages
Payal Rathod wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:29:16PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
I cannot find the score in default rule folder i.e
/usr/share/spamassassin/
No scores are given for those rules.
Should be something like this in 50_scores.cf:
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0
James Lay wrote:
Hello All!
SoI'm thinking about trying sa-update. My rules are
in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Are there any gotchas or things I need to
be wary of before I plunge ahead? Just curious as I see a lot of
traffic on this topic in here. Thanks.
There was a problem with
James Lay wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:54:11 -0700
James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:07:32 -0500
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Lay wrote:
Hello All!
SoI'm thinking about trying sa-update. My rules are
in /etc/mail
Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
my system had a high cpu load with spamassassin with network tests ,
dcc + razor and fuzzy_ocr
because off this, we are considering disable razor or dcc from
tests...
but we have doubt about which is better: disable razor or dcc?
any recomendations??
If the
Brian S. Meehan wrote:
Spamassassin is invoked from Courier-MTA. (OS is SUSE Pro 9.3)
The /usr/lib/courier/etc/courierd file has the following line:
DEFAULTDELIVERY=| /usr/bin/spamassassin | /usr/lib/courier/bin/maildrop
FYI, a cleaner way to do this is:
DEFAULTDELIVERY=|
Brian S. Meehan wrote:
Bowie,
I implemented your changes and now I'm seeing BAYES scores on all
messages, whether it is 00 or 99.
1) changed courierd defaultdelivery to be cleaner
2) added the xfilter line to the top of maildroprc above the sorting
rules 3) added the exception to the bottom
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Ok I found the rule,
Now I just got a little more confused
Does SA read and score from
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org
As well as from
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin ?- this is where I have added
custom rules in the past.
And I
Evan Platt wrote:
At 11:45 AM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
when i run spamassassin --lint i get this error messages..
C:\testspamassassin --lint
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUB LIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
Failed to parse line
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jason Wellman wrote:
...
I have all incoming mail that is tagged as Spam
delivered to a CaughtSpam IMAP box for each user.
...
Should I also have sa-learn from the CaughtSpam folder? I have
read some places that say yes, and some that say no.
YES. Those
Jason Wellman wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. One last question that I am currently
tossing around. Sitewide vs individual learning... I have a small
domain, less then 50 users. Should I be looking at setting up a
sitewide bayes database instead of individual ones? Again I find
Pablo Allietti wrote:
Hi all i want to increase the score of a images rules how can i do
that ? for example
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02
i want to modify the score about this rules for example 4.0 which
file i need to modify? how?
Just drop the new score rules into your
Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hello all,
I have a bit of a problem. I am trying to come up with a solution
that I think will help a lot of people who use the qmail toaster mail
server. I have my toaster setup to drop mail tagged as spam into spam
directories in each users mailbox. I am planning on
David Berten wrote:
I am trying to use URIDNSBL but can not get DNS resolution
SpamAssassin 3.1.7
Output:::
Net-DNS-0.59]# spamassassin -D dns --lint
[22770] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[22770] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.59
[22770] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
Debbie D wrote:
Can someone please remind me how to create custom scores for existing
rules?? I do not want to manually go in and change any particular
score, any update will over ride that.. I want to manually change
them to hit on a higher [or lower as the case might be] score.
If memory
files. Because of this, the if-modified-since checks all returned
false and the real rulesets didn't clobber the broken ones.
Chris
Bowie Bailey wrote:
The fix was to simply delete the contents of the directory and try
again.
rm /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the official tool since no one ever
submitted RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
I'm glad it isn't the official tool
R Lists06 wrote:
I am sorry if I am asking this question and it is answered in the
archives. I will try to go back and read those past posts but is
there a site where I can download the SARE stock rules and the
plugins? I am aware of Rules Du Jour but whenever I have attempted
to
Leander Koornneef wrote:
On 19-okt-2006, at 10:15, Jo Rhett wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the
SURBL tests and Razor2. Will I likely gain any thing via this?
Does DCC catch what other tests miss?
DCC and Razor are very similar
Fabien GARZIANO wrote:
De : Bowie Bailey Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2006 18:17
What I do is this:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
This gives me the detailed X-Spam-Report header listing the
scores, rule names, and rule descriptions.
Thanks for the answer. I've tried most
After the domain went back to normal, I continued to have a problem
with RDJ. It still reported lint errors.
The problem was that the RulesDuJour directory had become corrupted
with the temporary page that had been downloaded during the outage.
The fix was to simply delete the contents of the
Debbie D wrote:
On Mon, October 16, 2006 2:28 pm, Debbie D said:
this high amount of spam, (BTW scoring at 20-well over 1000) is
killing the loads and I have screaming clients..
Just this afternoon (again around 12.30) it loaded up again with
312 mails.. the web based control
What I do is this:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
This gives me the detailed X-Spam-Report header listing the scores,
rule names, and rule descriptions.
Bowie
Fabien GARZIANO wrote:
Thanks for the answer Theo.
I think I was not clear enough in my first message. What I'm looking
for
Matt Florido wrote:
* Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-17-2006 10:25]:
score SARE_GIF_STOX 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Can you tell me what each corresponding 2.5 represents?
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
score SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME n.nn [ n.nn n.nn n.nn ]
Assign scores (the number of points for
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration
listing advantages
and disadvantages as I see it. I use RDJ mainly due to inertia. If
it works, don't touch it.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know that there is much difference in the configuration
required. For sa-update, you create a file with a list of
rulefiles. For RDJ, you create
801 - 900 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo
