McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 07:44 -0700, hateSpam wrote:
Running on...
[ ] Redhat linux version 6.0
[ ] Minix
[ ] OpenVMS
[ ] Sun/OS 2.0
[X] Timex Sinclair ZX81
[ ] Windows NT 3.02B
[ ] Something else?
Installed using...
[ ] tarball install
[ ] CPAN
[ ] RPM
[ ] deb
[
hateSpam wrote:
Thanks for reply.
Sorry, I should say that before. I am using CentOS Linux 5. For mailing
delivery we are using Postfix version 2.3.3 and Procmail.
Yes, but the most important question still remains.
How did you originally install SpamAssassin ?
Regards,
Rick
Michael Grant wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 16:08, Micah Anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
Michael Grant michael.gr...@gmail.com writes:
I did not realize one could store the bayes scores in sql.
So I'd store the bayes scores on a third server and let both mxes use
the same database.
I did
Jeff Drury wrote:
SA is working for the most part beyond expectations, the only problem
I’m having is filtering spoofed email address (i.e.
valid_u...@ourdomain.com). I am able to filter out non-valid user
addresses (i.e. spam...@ourdomain.com). I run SA-Update daily, have
piped well over 500
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tors, Juni 18, 2009 20:36, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest version (3.2.5) and running and
sa-update to get the latest rules.
how will this help on spoofed mail problem ?
The improved rules should help catch them.
Rick
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
I have searched far and wide for a good Spamassassin report using
numerous keywords in Google searches, but I can't find the one that fits
my needs. I am looking for a script that can be run via cron job on a
daily basis. I would pass the script the location of the mail
Mikael Bak wrote:
schmero...@gmail.com wrote:
One of our client's websites gets hacked frequently - 1x per month -
usually with some kind of phishing scam.
We've also had some problems lately. After deep investigations we saw
that in 100% of the cases there were no break-ins at all. Not in
Marc Perkel wrote:
What they should do is return different codes to indicate what got them
on the list. SAV is not backscatter. So if it is from and there is
DATA then it's someone who is sending bad bounce messages to faked
sender addresses. But if there is nod DATA then it's SAV. These
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Res wrote:
To be truthful, I have been doing this by default here, as well, but
find that it creates some problems for some users. So I am thinking
about opening up SMTP-AUTH ports. Trouble is (and its semi-relevance to
this list) I have to wonder
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.09 11:24, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it
happens about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a
hold of someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to send
out
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it
happens about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a
hold of someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to
send out spam
Kevin Miller wrote:
I'm sure I'm missing the obvious, but I can't seem to find a guide to writing
spamassassin rules on the spamassassin web page. I'd like to write some custom
rules, and some documentation would be really handy. Anybody got that URL
handy?
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu 03 Sep 2009 03:05:50 PM CEST, Justin Mason wrote
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersenm...@junc.org wrote:
On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote
Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even
if it can be
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 14-Sep-2009, at 05:24, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
If the OP cannot refrain from that sort of foul language when
presented with counter arguments then please ban. The list would be
far happier IMHO.
Based on his reply to LuKreme, +1 on a
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 9/30/2009 10:25 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I sincerly hope people realize its a serious thing, and take this mail
to improove things and setups. And please dont include lists that are
not up to the task yet).
This may be of interest..
Adam Katz wrote:
Does anybody here know anything about the legitimacy of Constant
Contact http://www.constantcontact.com/anti_spam.jsp ?
Hi,
Very legitimate. We have 4 or 5 clients who use it to send out emails
to their subscribers.
How ever, it can and does get abused by spammers from
Mark Hedges wrote:
As I've already confirmed by including the debugging log
attachment in my first message, the test rule is loaded, it
expects to be looking at spammers.rbl.dmz. (I have a
somewhat complex setup due to multiple scanners with
different preferences and mostly shared options.)
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Dear Sirs
I noticed a problem with Spamassassin whitelists and Simscan:
Spamassassin is configured to use white lists using mysql (for example)
*mysql select * from userpref;
+--++-++
|
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your answer.
So for these cases as could do to work whitelists?
It can be solution in spamassassin or simscan?
Hello,
When more than one recipient for an email is received simscan uses the
default user when passing to spamd. So
On 26/01/2010 11:33 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.0
Introduction
This is a major release, incorporating enhancements and bug fixes that have
accumulated in a year and a half of development since the 3.2.5 release.
Apart from some new
On 28/01/2010 9:52 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
ram wrote:
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
This rule started causing problems at the beginning of the year and was
fixed. Have you run sa-update to get the latest rules?
And don't forget to restart spamd and, if
Rense Buijen wrote:
Hi Group,
I was wondering, setting up a mailserver with spamassassin and optionaly
amavis and/or mailscanner takes a big amount of time if you want to do
it right.
Is there a system or set of scripts that can speed things up and maybe
with some dialoques to configure a
Hi,
Anyone ever hear of or use them?
www.mipspace.org
Looks like they block commercial senders.
Regards,
Rick
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
HI
I had a query, i am using a webmail interface called
squerrel mail , i need to make changes on the ./conf.pl
file ( folders option ) so that when the user first time
logs a folder called spam is already created . can this
be possible ??
Agnello . G .Dsouza
Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:40, Steven Stern wrote:
Have you tried running a local caching name server? That can cut down
on times to do repetitive name lookups.
Yes indeed, it's something we've always had on mail servers even before
we had SpamAssassin, for exactly that
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server with
scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with scores of over
10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject title please ?
Any help much appreciated.
Chris.
simscan for qmail can
Michael Grant wrote:
I'm running 3.2.3. I'm noticing that spamc/spamd fails when it's
presented large messages containing rather large mime attachments
(like more than a megabyte or so). When I run the messages through
spamc by hand, it returns immediately with a not-spam result with
headers
James Lay wrote:
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
James
Same here, seems quite a bit faster!
Great job!
Rick
Henry Kwan wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to have SA skip messages over a certain size?
I tried using this procmailrc recipe:
:0fw
* 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc
But it resulted in this error:
spamd[2492]: razor2: razor2 check failed: razor2: razor2 had unknown error
during check at
Skip wrote:
Other than the initial reports of performance boost from 3.2.4, I haven't
seen much discussion on it as yet. Perhaps it is still too soon to know,
but has anyone been seeing other benefits - or identified potential
problems?
No problems with it at all here (around 7 servers
Jorge Valdes wrote:
No problems with it at all here (around 7 servers upgraded) and the
performance is greatly increased. I went from a 1.4 second average
scan time to 0.6 seconds average.
HTH,
Rick
Is this without network tests?
Because on my server I had
Begin : 2008-01-01
End
Bazooka Joe wrote:
Do you think anyone has notified blogspot.com that their site is being
abused by spammers?
I have submitted urls 4 or 5 times to them. I've never heard back but
the sites did vanish pretty quickly.
You can do it here
Tony Bunce wrote:
Sorry for the Off Topic thread but I’m at a loss.
Is anyone else having issues sending mail to Yahoo?
They are returning 421 Message temporarily deferred to every message my
servers try to send. My server then retries like it should but yahoo
never accepts the
Miguel Angel wrote:
Hello,
i am using spamassassin 3.2.3 with qmail and simscan, the problem i
have it is that my authenticated smtp
users have any mails rejected because a high score, i know i can use
other ip not listed in mx of the domains
to create a server with required authentication
Miguel Angel wrote:
The latest versions of simscan will not run spamc on email where
RELAYCLIENT is set. This can happen via smtp auth or via tcp.smtp.
You might want to take this over to the simscan mailing list and post
your ./configure options so we can help you figure out why it is
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Another query.. another busy SA day.
I have a piece of Spam that is getting through to one of our biggest
clients. I have written rules to tag this Spam, but it is as if it isn't
even being checked by Spamassassin.
I have checked our qmail control files to
Josie Walls wrote:
Hello,
Would this group agree that requiring 5 hits in order to classify an email
as spam is too conservative a number?
I suspect ISPs have their filter settings at 3 or less.
Any insight would be appreciated.
I'm an ISP and we use 5 to mark and 10 to reject at smtp time
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Hi,
is there a simple way of using the same Bayes-DB (mysql based) for
multiple Spamassassin installations concurrently? Can I just point all
machines to the same DB or will this lead to corruption?
I've been doing it like that for over 2 years without a
Somebody will send SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and:
- Spamassassin marks it as SPAM (which is correct)
- But user doesn’t exist on somedomain1.com (it happen)
- So qmail is storage this mail in queue as long as it can.
My question is, what is the best practice and how
Hi,
I've got have a message that seems to tie up spamd forever.
I'm not sure if it's my setup or spamd itself. I run a very generic
stable release setup with bayes in mysql, although the hang up does not
appear to be bayes.
Would one of the developers like to contact me off list to get a
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Hi.
I'm testing a setup with DirectAdmin boxes and a dedicated spamd box,
but so far I've found that spam_required is a global setting and you
can't seem to send user_prefs across since they live on the spamc server.
Is there a workaround for this at all? Can SA be
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by
MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with
Michael Grant wrote:
Do any of you out there run spamassassin on a mail relay or pop/imap
server to add the X-Spam headers to all mail that passes through your
gateway?
If you do, how do you let individual users (who don't have accounts on
your relay) tweak their user_prefs file to whitelist
JamesDR wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
[snip]
1) Message comes in, check against AWL, if sender/ip pair do not exist,
send the tempfail, if sender/ip pair do exist:
2) Check the average score against some
jdow wrote:
From: Jonas Eckerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logan Shaw wrote:
Basically, greylisting has an achilles heel: legit messages
from unknown senders are delayed a long time. This is fine for
Only if you use a long delay.
In my experience a grey period of 3 minutes is enough to stop most
kazabe wrote:
Hi
Im using SA with a postfix mail server. But i need use this server,
to protect another server (puntually a MS EXchange). So the postfix
receive the messages, process it and pass the filtered messages to the
MS Ech.
Normally my users use imap to read the messages, using a
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:45:07 +1000, Leigh Sharpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks like I have to reset my Bayes and re-train it. I want to do
it properly this time. I will be making sure I personally review every
message that our users put into the spam folder first,
jdow wrote:
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K! I bet you are running system wide Bayes for a very non-homogeneous
collection of people. I've appended my figures (not the best I have
seen but very good) below yours. Your BAYES_00 is better than mine
only if you do not consider
Joe Zitnik wrote:
Does anyone have a source for statistics on spam victims, ie. the number
of people who actually click on the Remove Me line, or who update
their banking information, or who actually buy those pencil enlargement
pills?
Not as such but there was one client who hadn't payed
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since upgrading
to 3.1.3.
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log show
BBBIII, and eventually it's all B.
I've started hupping the server every night but I do not have the same
problem on
jdow wrote:
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm having a strange problem on one of my spamd servers since
upgrading to 3.1.3.
After awhile under heavy load, children are not exiting, ie the log
show BBBIII, and eventually it's all B.
I've started hupping
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Both servers have exactly the same config except for the auto-learn
and bayes/user prefs are stored in mysql on the FreeBSD server.
Thanks to all who replied.
I found the problem and it's related to ixhash, the timeout doesn't work
correctly / work at all.
I see
at how fast DNS is
for you
Dirk
Dallas Engelken schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July
10, 2006 11:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange problem
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Both servers
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
Both servers have exactly the same config except for
the
auto-learn
and bayes/user prefs are stored in mysql on the FreeBSD server.
Thanks to all who replied.
I found the problem and it's related to ixhash, the
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util-trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have to be running
something newer than 3.1.3.
anyways, check by
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util-trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
well, the pyzor/razor plugins now (svn) use the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout code, instead of
M::SA::Util-trap_sigalrm_fully
i'm not sure if that would help or not, but you'd have
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
|| 5;
+ my $timer =
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout-new({ secs =
$timeout
});
+ my $err = $time-run_and_catch(sub {
+ $answer =
I assume you mean $timer- (vs $time-) there?
D
This diff seems to work. I'm going to
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Further, I don't know why it even uses it's own DNS resolver. It would
make much more sense to use SA's and do all this in the background.
I'm just assuming that the original author wasn't aware of it's
existence or was too lazy
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Further, I don't know why it even uses it's own DNS resolver. It
would make much more sense to use SA's and do all this in the background.
I'm just assuming that the original author wasn't aware of it's
existence
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:56:41 PM, DAve DAve wrote:
In frustration I edited /etc/resolv.conf and removed 127.0.0.1, URI
lookups are completing and MailScanner is blasting through the queues on
both machines exceedingly fast now.
No idea what could have possibly changed,
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 7:53:45 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Unlikely to be a dnscache issue. I run over 10 SA servers, all with
local djb dnscaches.
Aha, but do you use Linux or FreeBSD?
I can't remember the details but I remember a FreeBSD/SA issue
recently.
Hi
Matt Adair wrote:
We recently upgraded our spamassassin from 2.64 to 3.1.4, upgrading to
Perl 5.8.4 in the process. We also run PHP 4.4.1.
Everything seems to be running OK, except for email that is sent
through PHP's mail command to local user accounts. In this situation,
the email in our
Nick Rout wrote:
Hi, I am new to this list and certainly not a SA expert, however I have
moderate experience in general linux issues and mailer issues.
I am getting a series of messages allowed through on the basis of
USER_IN_WHITELIST. I have searched the mailing list archive and pored
over my
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:58:59 -0400
Thanks, quick reply! (Thanks too Daryl, also quick)
So I take it USER_IN_WHITELIST also checks Return-Path? I wonder where
Return-Path is being set? Is it likely to be set by the spammer? Or is
my system adding it in somewhere (probably in
DuBois, Joseph wrote:
Ok.
Last week was hoping to get Spamassassin to work, but still no luck. My
hosting provider is pretty much useless saying everything is running
fine. I have removed all custom rules except for the following two,
which lowers the score down to a one(1) and should rewrite
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Christian Purnomo wrote:
I am having so much trouble at present that some people are using my
email address to send their spam messages, in return I get hundreds and
hundres of non-delivery email + other misc reply such as out of office.
The first
Will Duff wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been working with SpamAssassin for the course of Google's Summer
of Code to create 'SpamAssassin Coach' - an add-in available for
Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook. The purpose of the add-in
is to allow users to report spam and ham to SpamAssassin
Rob McEwen wrote:
RE: SpamAssassin Coach - Outlook/Thunderbird Plugin
Any chance that an Outlook Express version might be forthcoming?
I know that many of the Unix admins on this list hate any thing Microsoft
produces and probably especially Outlook Express... but the fact is that a
very
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris Thielen wrote:
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to
wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional
updates foreseen it should probably be removed from
Robert Nicholson wrote:
So,
I'm looking at mail being sent to my domain and it's overwhelmingly mail
people who don't exist at my domain.
I'd rather this was trapped before my qmail script executed. every one
of these mails is forking the perl interpreter and executing my perl
script
SM wrote:
At 08:53 26-09-2006, Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring
with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and
Steve Ingraham wrote:
mail.okcca.net. 21592 IN A 204.87.111.225
;; Query time: 2 msec
;; SERVER: 216.55.144.5#53(216.55.144.5)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 27 21:16:14 2006
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 48
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# telnet 204.87.111.225
Trying 204.87.111.225...
telnet: connect
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still running 3.3 average 1.38
All running Centos on exactly the same hardware.
Thanks in advance.
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still
On 24/03/2010 4:09 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
several more RBL's,
check your dns performance?
Looks like the new PSBL DNSBL is a bit slow. I wonder if the new load
from SA 3.3 is the cause? g
A quick walk through the SA log shows it isn't helping much here, so
I've
On 08/04/2010 2:00 PM, Frederic De Mees wrote:
Hello All,
It seems that the rule URIBL_BLACK is never matched in my installation,
even when it should.
My server is a debian Lenny, postfix, spampd (policy daemon),
spamassassin 3.2.5-2+lenny2
When I run 'spamassassin -D some_spam_mail', the
On 21/06/2010 11:39 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
My philosophy in the past has always been not to scan outgoing emails
because my users are not likely to be spamming.
However, a couple of issues recently with spambots and SMTP AUTH with
weak passwords has me reconsidering that stance.
Is anyone
On 27/07/2010 1:03 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
Hi all,
I can scan all the attachment as per rule define in simcontrol and
tcp.smtp. But I am not able to detect the spam mail as define in rule
set of /etc/mail/spamassassin/ ..please help
[r...@spd tcprules.d]# cat tcp.smtp
On 27/07/2010 1:21 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
Thanks Rick,
Now my tcp.smtp file looks like below
[r...@spd tcprules.d]# cat tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/q
mail/control/domainkeys/%/private
On 27/07/2010 1:41 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
Logs are as per below...
@40004c4f187213960bb4 tcpserver: pid 4844 from 192.168.10.70
@40004c4f1872139a2294 tcpserver: ok 4844 spd:192.168.30.195:25
:192.168.10.70::60052
@40004c4f187216259034 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
On 11/04/2011 8:58 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
If you can read french please look in this message
http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/tmp/joke_spam.001.txt
read the Subject: and then the SA results. :-D
How big must this idiots be? :-/
Note: They have bombed my
On 11/05/2011 4:01 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/dnswlabusehistory.svg
Percentage of total spam from legitimate email providers in April as
reported as abuse to dnswl.org:
35.5% yahoo.com
6.4% google.com
2.9% tp.pl
2.3% tin.it
1.8% messagelabs.com
On 27/02/2012 11:18 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On 02/27/2012 05:06 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/27/2012 9:12 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hello,
our mail setup is kinda different than usual configuration: we have a
lot of mailboxes all owned by a single userid. The directories tree is
composed using a
Hi,
Running a 4 server cluster of SA servers with MySQL running on one. 2 running
auto learn and the other two just doing queries. Looks like I average about
6300 queries a minute. No noticeable problems with it.
Recently looked at Maria but we are in the middle of a move here, would love
Hi,
One common bayes DB running MySql on one server.
Spa001 running SA and MySQL plus auto learn
Spa010 running SA no auto learn
Spa011 running SA no auto learn
Spa013 running SA with auto learn
All Spas looking at the MySQL server on Spa001.
Global bayes database btw, not per user as we are
Sammy Anderson wrote:
And there is one of these for each user, this is just for one user. Sounds
like we may have to abandon Bayes or possibly use mysql. Not sure we are
ready to invest in setting that all up...
Bayes in MySQL is a snap to setup and it really runs rings around the
dbm
John Rudd wrote:
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of these checks is to try to
identify those messages that are likely to be coming directly (with no
intermediary mail server) from a zombie-bot, and are thus likely to
John Rudd wrote:
I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
used to do in MimeDefang. The purpose of these checks is to try to
identify those messages that are likely to be coming directly (with no
intermediary mail server) from a zombie-bot, and are thus likely to
John Rudd wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Hi,
Right off the bat I've disabled it. It, of course, hits on all mail
my local users send. That's not really acceptable in an ISP situation
so I've turned it off until tomorrow when I have the time to look at
the code and see
Anders Norrbring wrote:
I have a slight problem.. I thought I'd finally start using sa-learn
to train the Bayes, the catch is that I have Cyrus and its mailboxes on
another server.. I transport the mail via LMTP to Cyrus.
So, is there a smooth way to use sa-learn on the remote IMAP folders,
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if this question should go to this list , my apologies if that
is the case.
My setup is as follows;
BSD box gets all incoming SMTP traffic, then forwards to exchange server- no
mailbox per say holds any mail-
My goal is to is have one email
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 20 November 2006 15:08, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's possible that they could send it all twice but I've never seen it.
Remember that some unbelievable number of infected Windows clients are
the main source of spam and it would just be too much trouble
Tom Allison wrote:
I was reading through the man pages about the use of a database for the
storage of bayesian tokens.
Is this a list that is global to the mail server, or something that is
distinct for each user of that mail server?
In other words -- will I have the exact same bayesian
Craig Zeigler wrote:
it seems over the past couple of weeks, I'm getting 50-80 of these per
day into my inbox. From what I can tell, it isn't hitting the bayes
filters when other messages do. Anyone have any idea? I have sorted
these and trained the bayes filters, but if it isn't hitting
Ed Kasky wrote:
At 02:00 PM Monday, 11/27/2006, Bill Randle wrote -=
Like other posters, I don't have real stats on the amount of spam that
makes it past the filters, other than my own mailbox. I typically get
from 2-3 spam messages per day, on rare occasions, maybe 6-10. We use
blacklisting,
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Mark Martinec wrote:
Indeed. Also coupling it with p0f (passive operating system
fingerprinting)
Good idea. Should have thought of that. :-)
About p0f see:
Those who like SQL might like the stuff at
http://whatever.frukt.org/p0fstats.text.shtml wich includes my
Rubin Bennett wrote:
SpamAssassin 3.1.5,
FuzzyOCR 3.4.2
Rules_du_jour:
TRUSTED_RULESETS=
TRIPWIRE
ANTIDRUG
SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1
SARE_EVILNUMBERS2
RANDOMVAL
BOGUSVIRUS
SARE_ADULT
SARE_FRAUD
SARE_BML
SARE_SPOOF
SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM
SARE_OEM
SARE_RANDOM
SARE_HEADER
SARE_HEADER_ENG
Craig wrote:
Yes I have asked this question previously, but with not as much detail.
MY ENVIRONMENT
SA 3.1.7
running on Windows 2000
Using Bayes
In the past 2 days my email server has received 14,973 email messages,
Spamassassin has scanned 10,951 of those messages, and my users have
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
