it only looks a tiny subset of all bogon ranges, if
it covered all of them, you might find it a bit higher, maybe not, who
knows since it doesn't look at 90% of them.
But I agree with Henrik in that a ruleset updatable by updates.spamas...
would be a beter way to go.
--
Res
"What do
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote:
DNS checks would be overkill for a list that doesn't change that often.
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/ has good info,
Yes agreed, we have used Robs templates for a long time :)
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn'
u.com), or, at the very least,
a ruleset, which can be updated in the "daily updates run" when new
ranges are allocated.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
I now need to disable.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
Greetings,
Can anyone tell me how the bogon list in this rule is updated?
Does it query a live bogon DNS server? The wiki does not explain or say
much at all about it.
Thanks
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
cript broke, and I'm sure they would
have found and fixed it pretty fast.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
nk
they are to dictate that, the only losers there are trend micro users,
and unless they change their policy, ultimately, it will be trend micro
who lose.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
give me your auspices.
I'd love to see what this Troll posts if you say 'sure'. :)
- C
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Christian Brel wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:10:11 +1000 (EST)
Res wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
Christian Brel wrote:
Perhaps the time has come for a fork of Spamassassin where these
commercial considerations are not so obvious?
No need for such
e day it is, is the day I look elsewhere.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
s, I will never allow
someone unrelated to my business to decide whats "not a spam host".
Even the most looked after networks, can have an authorised user who
becomes worm infected, and spams the hell out of everyone.
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
t the heart of every one
of the spam 'and virus' firewalls they sell. This could potentially mean
that Barracuda are not getting up-to-date information on mysql
developments - so they can steal it and put it in their chudware.
indeed :)
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doe
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
safe. BRBL has a high hit rate as well, with a moderate safety rating.
Wondered why i wasn't getting anything from mysql.com for over a week,
BRBL has them listed :)
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?"
me becuase *WE* dont accept on submission
port for our customers,
I never named you, specifially, take the tickets off yourself loser, your
not the only one in this thread
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
t? you are clutching at straws now, this
started out an attack on me becuase *WE* dont accept on submission port
for our customers, I dont care what other companies like that do, they can
accept mail on port 80 for all I care.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
nt know me to well, i've never changed a decision based on what
any wet dreamer on a list or usenet has said to me yet, and i aint about
to start either)
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
09.08.09 09:26, Res wrote:
Not bad for me, we used to do this, it only got us into blacklists, so
we stopped it except for hosting cusotmers, we are going the right way,
Do you allow relaying from configured IP addresses without authentication?
And you call that the right way? Even if those IP
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.08.09 09:20, Res wrote:
Correct, only relay for your own customers based on your own IP ranges,
pretty much removes abuse, and smtp-auth is only enabled on hosting
servers, hosting customers don't use end-users smtp, nor can end user
d blink an eyelid and or even notice if you didnt
sign with us or left us,
Yeah, that was the Attitude AT&T had over hear for about 5 years before they
care factor?
hrm, still sub zero
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, RW wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:36:25 +1000 (EST)
Res wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, RW wrote:
wrong again, this assumes the ISP enables submission,
What do you mean enables submission? They don't have to enable
anything, just not block the port. ISP's bloc
snt either.
And the number of ISPs here blocking outgoing 25 I could likely count on
one hand, and we dont seem to have many problems.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Res wrote:
this assumes the ISP enables submission,
If an ISP doesn't enable submission then walk away and find a real ISP that
What rubbish
cares about it's customers. Seriously, no port 587 = no customer. If
anywhere, insteaad of anyone's
*sigh* for end users, not going to happen, ever, not whilst i'm in
charge, and sorry to say but if you ever move to Australia, youll find
its a common attitude amongst the large, medium and most smaller ISP's
here.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
ed using 587 because nothing
warrants it, regarding this geographical location.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
versal
thing, because it aint.
This doesn't make sense, when ISPs block outgoing port 25 you can use
port 587 or 465 to connect to the server of your choice, it doesn't
wrong again, this assumes the ISP enables submission, we dont, i've tested
a few very large isp's here an
fantomas wrote:
On 28.07.09 12:12, Res wrote:
Actually, if he is a connection customer of foobar.com, he should use
foobar.coms SMTP server as his smarthost, as they will allow their
do you mean "they will only allow" ?
any ISP that relays for non customers, needs a kicking. (host
foobar.coms SMTP server as his smarthost, as they will allow their
customers to relay through them, that way most servers will only care
about mail.foobar.com
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
ger problems, most of the big ISP's and many many many others
block at MTA level for your type of connections, either get a static IP
*and* a real PTR entry, or use your ISP as smarthost.
Nothing wrong with the way this list is setup apart from it uses qmail,
but we wont go into that :
his to dns, not my problem
Why are people still using the outdated and no longer recommended
domain TXT method?
The RR type SPF was ratified some time ago. If an OS uses an antiquated
resolver that does not know about the SPF RR, that too is the operators
problem, no one elses.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 25-Jun-2009, at 07:08, Res wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
1. It's 'You're' a joke - not 'your' a joke
Ah the classic sign of someone in defeat, has to nit pick someones grammer
NB: it's
shit about what an Australian spammer thinks of me,
will be the day hell freezes over.
oh im a spammer now am I, awww poor widdle wicky, go cry to mummy, or tell
someone who gives a fuck.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:41 +1000, Res wrote:
if you jump on a bandwagon without first hand experience, thats *exactly*
what you are, if you had experienced it first hand of course you become an
authority on the subject in your your case, and
by association was not a crime in modernised civil countries :)
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
so that we could see all
the headers for any complaints, and deal with them promptly like we
always did once we knew who they were.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
payment were only needed for spam, not for "dul"
On 23.06.09 11:07, Res wrote:
not really :) despite what their site said/says.. its kind of a detterent
i think sunno we never paid
well, we&
increase for us here if it closes.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
Res a écrit :
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
payment were only needed for spam, not for "dul"
not really :) despite what their site said/says.. its kind of a
detterent i think sunno we never paid
This is wrong. if you have evidence, s
been run (and thinking != running), its death, if
confirmed, is sad news.
If it is confirmed it wil indeed be sad times, SORBS catches the most of
the crap that comes in here
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
t in order to get off their
list in less than a year.
http://www.au.sorbs.net/faq/spamdb.shtml
Rubbish, we had one of ours in it a couple years ago, it took a couple
emails and no more than a few days for removal, nothing paid either.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
and might actually generate some respect for your opinions if they displayed
I only care that my friends respect me (as I respect them), none of my
friends on this list, I'm not here to make friends, I hav enough already.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
hance :)
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
A killfile. That would be the place to put "cry babies" wouldn't it?
Good idea. Glad you thought of it. Go do it. Add me while you're at it.
Sorry dont use em, I save sooks like you for rainy weekends so i can have
more fun when
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that includes
sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect people involved
in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
So
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
It's the weekend and I was bored :)
This list does not exist to provide you amusement.
Last time I looked, Justin ran this list, not you.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Truth still hurts hey, one day you might smell the coffee :)
On Sat, 13 Jun, Bill Landry as usual sooked nothing worth reading:
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
g to do, and none of that includes
sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect people
involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
TTFN
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
uot; extra
capability from my projects, if you want it *right now* pay me for it and
you'll get immediate attention, else tolerate what I've provided or fuck
off and use something else, I lose no sleep either way, my life comes
before no-life whinging fucking cry baby lamers like you.
>
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Bill Landry wrote:
Res wrote:
No because I seem to have reliable DNS and have never exhibited the issue.
Oh, and if in fact you "really" had a clue, you would know that "DNS
reliability" has absolutely nothing to do with this issue... ;-)
funn
I'm mightier than you" rants, you sad sad sad pathetic
excuse of man.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
easier to come
on a mailing list and have a temper tantrum like an 5yo kid.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
P's are of the same opinion
For the ordinary 'mongs' there is email.reg which is a 'pay to spam'
service :-)
Tongue in cheek or not, it's essentially true!
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
on or offlist, a URL to a policy that states why you
will block users querying your BRBL, this occurred some weeks ago to my
own personal system, which does a few K messages a day for myself, family,
friends and some of their friends, but yet not my employers which does a
darn sight more than that.
-
fit trolls attacking him
for it, ask yourself this, WTF are *YOU* doing to contribute to the
community to stop the crap? A few of you need to ask yourselves that!
Now, get over it, move on with life, that means fighting the
spammers not each other.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
jp wrote:
It only takes a minute or three on my systems depending on load. 21 seconds
on a zero load dual core virtual machine with 2gb ram.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:56:22AM +1000, Res wrote:
Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can
Is there a method of speeding this beast up? I can build four entire
kernels and their modules from scratch in the same time it takes this
thing to compile (45mins) is it really worth using this method?
Last time I tried without it, I noticed next to no difference, opinions?
--
Res
-Beware
55 matches
Mail list logo
