Re: Operation has timed out(3000 ms.).;

2012-03-23 Thread Dhaval Jaiswal
I have set it as below. However, still it is showing the same error. Please let me know what to do as our all tomcats are going on high load because of this kind of continuous logging. If there is any change required let us know. ERROR logging: *SEVERE: Unable to send message through cluster

jdbc driver location in TC 7

2012-03-23 Thread David kerber
Kind of related to the upgrade issue I ran into yesterday: Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations? If it makes a difference, I am not using tomcat's connection pooling; it's handled in my app. I

Access Log Valve invalid requests

2012-03-23 Thread Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX
Tomcat 6.0.35 http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/valve.html#Access_Log_Valve Some requests may be handled by Tomcat before they are passed to a container. These include redirects from /foo to /foo/ and the rejection of invalid requests. What is an invalid request? If I have a

RE: jdbc driver location in TC 7

2012-03-23 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7 Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations? If you look in conf/catalina.properties, you'll see the order in which the

partial response from non-browser clients

2012-03-23 Thread Serdyn du Toit
Hi, Using Tomcat 6.0.35 I got the server up and running and could retrieve webpages from my application perfectly - using the browser. Now I've written some client code of my own in Java and for one or other reason it doesn't want to retrieve everything - it only returns a partial response and

Re: jdbc driver location in TC 7

2012-03-23 Thread David kerber
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7 Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations? If you look in

configuring SSL for Tomcat with .pfx

2012-03-23 Thread Melanie Snayer
Hi everyone, I have been tasked with configuring SSL for Tomcat. I am new to Tomcat configuration so I have been through the docs and consulted many different articles in an attempt to figure out how all of this works. I have been given the following (attached): * Thawte Primary Root

RE: configuring SSL for Tomcat with .pfx

2012-03-23 Thread Melanie Snayer
Hi All, I didn't add the attachment to the previous email so here it is. Regards Melanie From: Melanie Snayer Sent: 23 March 2012 06:05 PM To: 'users@tomcat.apache.org' Subject: configuring SSL for Tomcat with .pfx Hi everyone, I have been tasked with configuring SSL for Tomcat. I am new to

Re: partial response from non-browser clients

2012-03-23 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/23 Serdyn du Toit dutoi...@gmail.com: Hi, Using Tomcat 6.0.35 I got the server up and running and could retrieve webpages from my application perfectly - using the browser.  Now I've written some client code of my own in Java and for one or other reason it doesn't want to retrieve

Re: configuring SSL for Tomcat with .pfx

2012-03-23 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/23 Melanie Snayer melan...@blueturtle.co.za: Hi All, I didn’t add the attachment to the previous email so here it is. 1. Attachments are not allowed on this mailing list. 2. Using HTML-formatted e-mails is strongly discouraged. Use plain text.

Re: Access Log Valve invalid requests

2012-03-23 Thread André Warnier
Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX wrote: Tomcat 6.0.35 http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/valve.html#Access_Log_Valve Some requests may be handled by Tomcat before they are passed to a container. These include redirects from /foo to /foo/ and the rejection of invalid requests. What is an

Re: partial response from non-browser clients

2012-03-23 Thread André Warnier
Serdyn du Toit wrote: Hi, Using Tomcat 6.0.35 I got the server up and running and could retrieve webpages from my application perfectly - using the browser. Now I've written some client code of my own in Java and for one or other reason it doesn't want to retrieve everything - it only returns

upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread Ray Holme
I have recently upgraded from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16. I am testing 4 tomcat applications on the local web (and one plain apache app.) on one box (no other tricks like multiple servers ...). The below should pretty well describe everything I think matters. I was running Tomcat 6.0.29 and then

RE: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Ray Holme [mailto:rayho...@yahoo.com] Subject: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work I downloaded and built the newest mod_jk.so (tomcat-connectors-1.2.33) Oops - please read the headline in the docs: The Apache Tomcat team wishes to draw your attention to stability issues that

Re: configuring SSL for Tomcat with .pfx

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel Mikusa
- Original Message - Hi everyone, I have been tasked with configuring SSL for Tomcat. I am new to Tomcat configuration so I have been through the docs and consulted many different articles in an attempt to figure out how all of this works. I have been given the following

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/23 Ray Holme rayho...@yahoo.com: I downloaded and built the newest mod_jk.so (tomcat-connectors-1.2.33) from src (had to strip final binary to make it work at all - not mentioned). I still have the old one if need be and yes I tried it too. 1.2.33 is known to be broken and causes core

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread André Warnier
Ray Holme wrote: I have recently upgraded from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16. I am testing 4 tomcat applications on the local web (and one plain apache app.) on one box (no other tricks like multiple servers ...). The below should pretty well describe everything I think matters. I was running

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread André Warnier
Note : you /do/ get bonus points for providing the versions of what you're using. Not everyone does that. And you also got an immediate reward, in the form of Chuck's and Konstantin's warnings about your mod_jk version (which could have caused you severe problems later, had you not mentioned

Re: Tomcat 7.0.x problems using LockOutRealm

2012-03-23 Thread Ed M
Hi All, Here's my problem: I get 403 error when using my custom realm with LockOutRealm. My implementation works with no problems on Tomcat 6.0.x. It also works well if I configure my realm with no *LockOutRealm *present in my configuration. Configuration for both versions in server.xml nested

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread Ray Holme
(had to strip final binary to make it work at all - not mentioned) What do you mean? I mean that the built binary was NOT stripped and would not work (apache complained about loading it - sorry I forgot the message). I simply did strip mod_jk.so and the size went down by a factor of 4 and

Re: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Chema
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunked_transfer_encoding 2. RFC 2616 (the specification of HTTP/1.1 protocol) One question How does web browser know what is the right order of the chunks ? When server waits for generating the whole response, I understand that transmission can rely on TCP and

RE: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Chema [mailto:demablo...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: chunked encoding How does web browser know what is the right order of the chunks ? The order they are passed to the client by the client's inbound TCP/IP stack is the correct order. But when server sends response by chunks I don't

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012-03-23 Thread Ray Holme
Andre - good information. Thanks but still in the weeds here. Depends how long Tomcat and your applications need to start up and be ready to answer requests. makes sense. since httpd is NOT coming up on boot as it should, I will make it second   with a preceding sleep and background the

Re: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Chema
The server application must pass the chunks to its outbound TCP/IP stack in order, so normal TCP sequencing takes care of it. Thanks But, if I'm not wrong , chunks messages belong application layer, so when servers pass them to TCP/IP stack , they are different messages. Do it by same

Re: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/24 Chema demablo...@gmail.com: The server application must pass the chunks to its outbound TCP/IP stack in order, so normal TCP sequencing takes care of it. Thanks But, if I'm not wrong , chunks messages belong application layer, so when servers pass them to TCP/IP stack , they are

RE: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Chema [mailto:demablo...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: chunked encoding But, if I'm not wrong , chunks messages belong application layer, so when servers pass them to TCP/IP stack , they are different messages. TCP/IP knows nothing about messages, only about the two byte streams for the

Re: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Chema
TCP packets are numbered (by TCP itself). Thus chunks are ordered as well. So, chunks aren't sent on the same time, but they are sent by the same TCP connection . In this case, it has sense for me: a stream of chunks . Thanks

Re: chunked encoding

2012-03-23 Thread Chema
2012/3/23 Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com: From: Chema [mailto:demablo...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: chunked encoding But, if I'm not wrong , chunks messages belong application layer, so when servers pass them to TCP/IP stack , they are different messages. TCP/IP knows nothing

Re: jdbc driver location in TC 7

2012-03-23 Thread Terence M. Bandoian
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote: On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7 Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE

RE: Access Log Valve invalid requests

2012-03-23 Thread Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX
-Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: Access Log Valve invalid requests Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX wrote: Tomcat 6.0.35 http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0- doc/config/valve.html#Access_Log_V alve Some requests may be handled by Tomcat

Re: jdbc driver location in TC 7

2012-03-23 Thread David Kerber
On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote: On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote: On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7 Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm