Only a Ip's set in application TOMCAT
Hello, I have a Tomcat with these releases: Versión de Tomcat: Apache Tomcat/5.5.17 Versión JVM: 1.4.2_01-b06 Nombre de SO: Windows XP I have two applications and one web services (axis) I like to do the tomcat filter by Ip in my applications and my web service. For example: App1 only can acces from 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 App2 can acces from 192.168.0.0/24 and the next Ip 100.100.100.1/32 WebService can access only from 100.100.100.1/32 and 100.100.90.1/32 It is possible? Do you any idea where I have to change the Tomcat conf? Best regrads, Julio.
Antwort: Re: Error re-starting war application
Hi as described before i am using Eclipse WTP 1.x for development of a web application and use it's 'Export' function for creating the .war file. Installing that application on Tomcat 5.5.17 works fine. Stopping and re-starting the application fails every time with a NullPointerException. So here is the log file snipplet i've forgotten to attach to my last post: INFO: HTMLManager: start: Starting web application at '/StageScanApplication' 09.06.2006 10:02:55 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log SCHWERWIEGEND: FEHLER - Anwendung mit Kontext Pfad /StageScanApplication konnte nicht gestartet werden java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.log4j.spi.LocationInfo.init(LocationInfo.java:104) at org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggingEvent.getLocationInformation(LoggingEvent.java:191) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.PatternParser$LocationPatternConverter.convert(PatternParser.java:483) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.PatternConverter.format(PatternConverter.java:64) at org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout.format(PatternLayout.java:503) at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.subAppend(WriterAppender.java:301) at org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender.subAppend(RollingFileAppender.java:234) at org.apache.log4j.WriterAppender.append(WriterAppender.java:159) at org.apache.log4j.AppenderSkeleton.doAppend(AppenderSkeleton.java:230) at org.apache.log4j.helpers.AppenderAttachableImpl.appendLoopOnAppenders(AppenderAttachableImpl.java:65) at org.apache.log4j.Category.callAppenders(Category.java:203) at org.apache.log4j.Category.forcedLog(Category.java:388) at org.apache.log4j.Category.log(Category.java:853) at org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4JLogger.debug(Log4JLogger.java:110) at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.init(ManagerBase.java:724) at org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager.start(StandardManager.java:618) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4137) at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.start(ManagerServlet.java:1175) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.start(HTMLManagerServlet.java:527) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.doGet(HTMLManagerServlet.java:104) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:689) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:524) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 09.06.2006 10:02:55 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: HTMLManager: list: Listing contexts for virtual host 'localhost' pls hlp, thx ingo
RE: Content-Disposition and Filename Attribute Not Working In Some Apache 2 Versions
In case anyone cares it turns out this is related to compression. A fix
in mod_setenvif for 2.0.49 and above caused compression to be turned on
for IE. IE apparently doesn't handle the file name correctly when
compression is involved. Firefox does though. Changing Apache to use
compression only on text type responses resolves this.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Baily
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:11 PM
To: 'users@tomcat.apache.org'
Subject: Content-Disposition and Filename Attribute Not Working In Some
Apache 2 Versions
Hi, I've found that when we upgraded from Apache 2.0.48 to 2.0.49 or any
other Apache release up to the current 2.0.58 part of the
content-disposition header seems to stop working. I opened up bug 39749
in the Apache section for this. I got a response from a person there
who said they were stumped and suggested I suggest you discuss with the
Tomcat folks which web server behavior influences the generation of that
header field..
Can anyone help me bridge the gap on this to determine where the issue
is? I've put my bug information from the other bug here. I'm willing
to run other tests and things in debug mode if I am told what settings
to use and where to look for results or output. We can reproduce this
on our development system every time.
Thanks!
Rob Baily
/-***-/
It appears that somewhere between 2.0.48 and 2.0.58 the setting of the
Content-
Disposition to set the file name for content returned broke. We are
using
Tomcat 5.0.28 and modJK 1.2.15. I have put the example servlet code
below.
When you run the URL the browser pops up with the file name
TestServlet.doc
instead of test_file_name.doc. I don't believe this to be a Tomcat
issue
since it works with HTTP 2.0.48 and not with HTTP 2.0.58.
I ran http://dev.servicebench.com/rbaily/servlet/TestServlet on my
system with
this test servlet.
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to clarify or help.
Thanks!
/*
* Created on Jun 7, 2006
*
* TODO To change the template for this generated file go to
* Window - Preferences - Java - Code Style - Code Templates
*/
package com.servicebench.webside.servlet;
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.servlet.ServletException;
import javax.servlet.ServletOutputStream;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
/**
* @author rbaily
*
* TODO To change the template for this generated type comment go to
* Window - Preferences - Java - Code Style - Code Templates
*/
public class TestServlet extends HttpServlet {
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
res)
throws ServletException, IOException
{
doPost(req, res);
}
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse
res)
throws ServletException, IOException
{
res.setContentType( application/msword );
res.setContentLength( 20 );
// set up file name
String fileName = filename=\test_file_name.doc\;
System.out.println( filename= + fileName );
res.setHeader( Content-Disposition, attachment; +
fileName );
res.setHeader( Expires, 0 );
res.setHeader( Cache-Control, must-revalidate, post-
check=0, pre-check=0 );
ServletOutputStream output = res.getOutputStream();
System.out.println( about to write );
output.print( 012345678900987654321 );
output.flush();
output.close();
}
}
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Only a Ip's set in application TOMCAT
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/security.html#restrict -Tim Julio Rios wrote: Hello, I have a Tomcat with these releases: Versión de Tomcat: Apache Tomcat/5.5.17 Versión JVM: 1.4.2_01-b06 Nombre de SO: Windows XP I have two applications and one web services (axis) I like to do the tomcat filter by Ip in my applications and my web service. For example: App1 only can acces from 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 App2 can acces from 192.168.0.0/24 and the next Ip 100.100.100.1/32 WebService can access only from 100.100.100.1/32 and 100.100.90.1/32 It is possible? Do you any idea where I have to change the Tomcat conf? Best regrads, Julio. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 protected pages JSP examples with valid user and invalid role results in msg 403.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am having problem with Tomcat 5.5.17 jsp example of accessing protected pages (example: http://localhost:8080/jsp-examples/security/protected/) Logging with valid user and role: user/password/role=tomcat/tomcat/tomcat works fine. Logging with a valid user and invalid role (user/password/role=role1/tomcat/role1) results in msg 403 (HTTP Status 403 - Access to the requested resource has been denied). I am using supplied tomcat-users.xml. Before experimenting I made this role (role1) invalid by editing webapps/jsp-examples/WEB-INF/web.xml file like: ... auth-constraint role-nametomcat/role-name !-- role-namerole1/role-name -- /auth-constraint ... After receiving msg 403 applicatin will not work even with the valid user role (msg 403 produced). I found the same problem for Tomcat4 reported at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/200204.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This was resolved as INVALID. See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8607 I also have seen somewhere that it was reported to be fixed for Tomcat4. Not fixed, it was never an issue. See above. Did the old problem penetrate to Tomcat 5.5.17 or did I forget to configure something? No, there isn't am issue. Mark - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SSL Setup
Thanks for the info. Finally figured out the problem.the certs were wrong in the keystore. Thanks for all your help though! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SSL-Setup-t1710991.html#a4791758 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Servlet on FileTypes
Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? Kenneth
Re: Servlet on FileTypes
Try just using *.page only. - Original Message - From: Kenneth Østby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Servlet on FileTypes Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? Kenneth - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to redirect HTTP request to HTTPS on Tomcat
Hi Gurus, I am using Tomcat 5.0.28, I have configured SSL. Now i want to know whether it is possible to redirect http request to https using server.xml file, meaning if i give http://localhost:8080 it should go to https://localhost:8443, I googled a lot but did not get a firm solution on this topic. Any ideas. TIA -Siddesh __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Servlet on FileTypes
You can do prefix or suffix matching. Not both. (Darn servlet spec) -Tim Kenneth Østby wrote: Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? Kenneth - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Servlet on FileTypes
On 6/9/06, Parsons Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try just using *.page only. That will only work on /*.page, not in every subdir. - Original Message - From: Kenneth Østby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Servlet on FileTypes Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? Kenneth - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to redirect HTTP request to HTTPS on Tomcat
From: Siddesh Prabhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using Tomcat 5.0.28, I have configured SSL. Now i want to know whether it is possible to redirect http request to https using server.xml file, meaning if i give http://localhost:8080 it should go to https://localhost:8443, I googled a lot but did not get a firm solution on this topic. Not that I'm aware of, but I'm not an expert. One trick would be to put a filter in front of your webappthat examines the incoming request, checks the protocol and redirects to the same server and path if it is not https - this is then a solution that you can deploy per-webapp where needed. - Peter - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib. Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything seems to work, and the manager confirms this, however one file remains - the jar file containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts to undeploy or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be stopped and the remaining file (and folder structure deleted). If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial deployment then undeploy works fine. Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem? Regards, Rych
Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
What platform are you on? I do know that the manager app will say it undeployed the application even if it does not have permission to delete all the files. Then when you try to deploy/undeploy again it will fail. If the log4j file is the only file not being deleted, then start with permissions on this file. On 6/9/06, Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib. Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything seems to work, and the manager confirms this, however one file remains - the jar file containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts to undeploy or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be stopped and the remaining file (and folder structure deleted). If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial deployment then undeploy works fine. Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem? Regards, Rych -- Marc Farrow
RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
Windows XP SP2. The log4j.properties file is in a .jar file. All the other jar files are removed OK. They are all created in the same way during the build process so I don't think permissions are related to this. It seems that Tomcat's internal logging system is picking up the log4j.properties file in my jar file and not releasing it when I undeploy. Rych -Original Message- From: Marc Farrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2006 14:23 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties What platform are you on? I do know that the manager app will say it undeployed the application even if it does not have permission to delete all the files. Then when you try to deploy/undeploy again it will fail. If the log4j file is the only file not being deleted, then start with permissions on this file. On 6/9/06, Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib. Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything seems to work, and the manager confirms this, however one file remains - the jar file containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts to undeploy or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be stopped and the remaining file (and folder structure deleted). If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial deployment then undeploy works fine. Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem? Regards, Rych -- Marc Farrow - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Servlet on FileTypes
Are you sure? How would Struts handle modules with a generic action servlet mapping for *.do? I.e., I can have module actions like /mod1/action1.do, /mod1/action2.do, /mod2/action1.do, etc., all stemming from the single *.do mapping to the action servlet. Tim -Original Message- From: Kenneth Østby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Servlet on FileTypes On 6/9/06, Parsons Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try just using *.page only. That will only work on /*.page, not in every subdir. - Original Message - From: Kenneth Østby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Servlet on FileTypes Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? Kenneth - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
Do you have a LogFactory.release() in your ServletContextListener? i.e.,
mine says:
public void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent sce)
{
logger.info(Application context destroyed.);
LogFactory.release(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());
}
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing
log4j.properties
Windows XP SP2.
The log4j.properties file is in a .jar file. All the other jar files
are removed OK. They are all created in the same way during the build
process so I don't think permissions are related to this.
It seems that Tomcat's internal logging system is picking up the
log4j.properties file in my jar file and not releasing it when I
undeploy.
Rych
-Original Message-
From: Marc Farrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2006 14:23
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app
containing log4j.properties
What platform are you on? I do know that the manager app will say it
undeployed the application even if it does not have
permission to delete
all the files. Then when you try to deploy/undeploy again it
will fail. If
the log4j file is the only file not being deleted, then start with
permissions on this file.
On 6/9/06, Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own
log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in
WEB-INF/lib.
Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything
seems to work,
and the manager confirms this, however one file remains -
the jar file
containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts
to undeploy
or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be stopped and the
remaining file (and folder structure deleted).
If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial
deployment then
undeploy works fine.
Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem?
Regards,
Rych
--
Marc Farrow
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Servlet on FileTypes
*.do goes to struts. Then struts does the appropriate re-mapping to the correct action. -Tim Tim Lucia wrote: Are you sure? How would Struts handle modules with a generic action servlet mapping for *.do? I.e., I can have module actions like /mod1/action1.do, /mod1/action2.do, /mod2/action1.do, etc., all stemming from the single *.do mapping to the action servlet. Tim -Original Message- From: Kenneth Østby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Servlet on FileTypes On 6/9/06, Parsons Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try just using *.page only. That will only work on /*.page, not in every subdir. - Original Message - From: Kenneth Østby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Servlet on FileTypes Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Servlet on FileTypes
That's what I thought. There is a solution then (for the OP's problem), but it does involve writing a dispatcher and mapping *.page to the dispatcher, and having it parse the context path the way struts does. *.jsp is the same exact case, actually. -Original Message- From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:53 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Servlet on FileTypes *.do goes to struts. Then struts does the appropriate re-mapping to the correct action. -Tim Tim Lucia wrote: Are you sure? How would Struts handle modules with a generic action servlet mapping for *.do? I.e., I can have module actions like /mod1/action1.do, /mod1/action2.do, /mod2/action1.do, etc., all stemming from the single *.do mapping to the action servlet. Tim -Original Message- From: Kenneth Østby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Servlet on FileTypes On 6/9/06, Parsons Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try just using *.page only. That will only work on /*.page, not in every subdir. - Original Message - From: Kenneth Østby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Servlet on FileTypes Hey.. I'm trying to map **/*.page to a spesific servlet, and I can't find any documentation about. Is there a way that I can use url-mapper to eat /**/*.page ? - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
This is related to Windows and your Context setup. For some reason Windows
locks some jars (don't know why), so when you undeploy, the exploded war
directory cannot be deleted.
Try setting up your context with the following settings.
reloadable=true
antiResourceLocking=true
Let me know if this works.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Lucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 6:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing
log4j.properties
Do you have a LogFactory.release() in your ServletContextListener? i.e.,
mine says:
public void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent sce)
{
logger.info(Application context destroyed.);
LogFactory.release(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());
}
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing
log4j.properties
Windows XP SP2.
The log4j.properties file is in a .jar file. All the other jar files
are removed OK. They are all created in the same way during the build
process so I don't think permissions are related to this.
It seems that Tomcat's internal logging system is picking up the
log4j.properties file in my jar file and not releasing it when I
undeploy.
Rych
-Original Message-
From: Marc Farrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2006 14:23
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app
containing log4j.properties
What platform are you on? I do know that the manager app will say it
undeployed the application even if it does not have
permission to delete
all the files. Then when you try to deploy/undeploy again it
will fail. If
the log4j file is the only file not being deleted, then start with
permissions on this file.
On 6/9/06, Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own
log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in
WEB-INF/lib.
Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything
seems to work,
and the manager confirms this, however one file remains -
the jar file
containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts
to undeploy
or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be stopped and the
remaining file (and folder structure deleted).
If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial
deployment then
undeploy works fine.
Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem?
Regards,
Rych
--
Marc Farrow
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!DSPAM:44897b5516561804284693!
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_jk - querystring
Hi, I have a setup of Apache2.0.54, mod_jk1.2.15 and tomcat 4.1.31 and I'm requesting page with a long querystring, as soon as it becomes longer than 3200chars the application seems to break. I've somewhere seen that querystring can be upto 8K So I'm wondering if mod_jk has further limits. I'm looking for causes in the application but have not been successful finding bug so I wonder. TIA Arnar Gestsson - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - querystring
In my experience in the past, 3200 chars was a more than I could ever get a successful get method. It would always truncate the query string. How are are you submitting the data? Can you change it to use a form/post submission? On 6/9/06, Arnar Gestsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a setup of Apache2.0.54, mod_jk1.2.15 and tomcat 4.1.31 and I'm requesting page with a long querystring, as soon as it becomes longer than 3200chars the application seems to break. I've somewhere seen that querystring can be upto 8K So I'm wondering if mod_jk has further limits. I'm looking for causes in the application but have not been successful finding bug so I wonder. TIA Arnar Gestsson - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Marc Farrow
RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing log4j.properties
Yes, that's fixed it. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Freeby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2006 16:03
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app
containing log4j.properties
This is related to Windows and your Context setup. For some
reason Windows locks some jars (don't know why), so when you
undeploy, the exploded war directory cannot be deleted.
Try setting up your context with the following settings.
reloadable=true
antiResourceLocking=true
Let me know if this works.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Lucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 6:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing
log4j.properties
Do you have a LogFactory.release() in your
ServletContextListener? i.e.,
mine says:
public void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent sce)
{
logger.info(Application context destroyed.);
LogFactory.release(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());
}
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app containing
log4j.properties
Windows XP SP2.
The log4j.properties file is in a .jar file. All the other jar files
are removed OK. They are all created in the same way during
the build
process so I don't think permissions are related to this.
It seems that Tomcat's internal logging system is picking up the
log4j.properties file in my jar file and not releasing it when I
undeploy.
Rych
-Original Message-
From: Marc Farrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2006 14:23
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 - undeploy fails for app
containing log4j.properties
What platform are you on? I do know that the manager app
will say it
undeployed the application even if it does not have
permission to delete
all the files. Then when you try to deploy/undeploy again it
will fail. If
the log4j file is the only file not being deleted, then start with
permissions on this file.
On 6/9/06, Hawkes, Rycharde (HP Labs)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a web-app that uses log4j-1.2.13. I specify my own
log4j.properties file which is contained in a jar file in
WEB-INF/lib.
Deployment is fine. When I try to undeploy everything
seems to work,
and the manager confirms this, however one file remains -
the jar file
containing the log4j.properties file! Any further attempts
to undeploy
or deploy are unsuccessful and the server has to be
stopped and the
remaining file (and folder structure deleted).
If I remove this file from the jar prior to the initial
deployment then
undeploy works fine.
Anyone else seen this/is this a known problem?
Regards,
Rych
--
Marc Farrow
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!DSPAM:44897b5516561804284693!
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - querystring
Arnar Gestsson wrote: Hi, I have a setup of Apache2.0.54, mod_jk1.2.15 and tomcat 4.1.31 and I'm requesting page with a long querystring, as soon as it becomes longer than 3200chars the application seems to break. I've somewhere seen that querystring can be upto 8K Actually, there's no limit on the length: http://rfc.net/rfc2616.html#s3.2.1 But it's very unwise to use excessively long URI. I agree with some authors that 100 to 200 characters are long enough for GET. Use POST instead: http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/forms/form.html So I'm wondering if mod_jk has further limits. I'm looking for causes in the application but have not been successful finding bug so I wonder. TIA Arnar Gestsson - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JSPs will not load with virtual domain
Dave Kennell wrote: I have a rather intresting but probably simple problem, as I am basically new to tomcat. Currently I am running Tomcat 5.5.17 on a Windows 2000 server. I installed the admin tool and setup a connector for port 80 and then a host of www.btdt.com (which I handle locally on my DNS). Here is the kicker. If I goto www.btdt.com/index.jsp it will not load...however if I goto 192.168.0.101/btdt the page renders fine. So I tried something static. if I goto www.btdt.com/static.htm it will load fine... as will 192.168.0.101/btdt/static.htm I am absoultly baffled as to why the virtual host fails to render the JSPs Can anyone help? huh, as I see you haven't receive any answer so I will try something... Check tomcat/logs directory... catalina.out and other files for any meaningful error. If you cannot see anything there post your server.xml file (without comments and unnecessary burden here) and I will try to look at it. -- Mladen Adamovic http://home.blic.net/adamm http://www.shortopedia.com http://www.froola.com http://www.online-utility.org - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: few fat contexts of many lean contexts?
Actually, I don't - this server provides web services only and *very small* set of reports pages, so going through the hassle of setting up Apache in front of tomcat wasn't deemed to be worth it. It doesn't have any impact on performance? I would have thought that multiple contexts would eventually lead to duplicated libraries which would ultimately lead to wasting memory. Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. On 6/7/06, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a performance point of view - it doesn't matter. From a maintenaince point of view - I prefer many lean clients. That way - if one of them behaves badly - off they go into a new JVM (assuming you have apache in front of tomcat) -Tim Javier Gonzalez wrote: Hi, I'm running a tomcat that provides services for a lot of clients. Each client one has a number of services (via axis) on their own context. Now I'm migratingto a bigger machine, and I got the doubt: is it better (for performance) to group as many services as possible by context, or have each service live in it's own context? In more general terms, is it better to group as much functionality as possible per context, or try to separate where it can be done? Thanks in advance, - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Javier González Nicolini - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: few fat contexts of many lean contexts?
Duplicate libraries wasting some extra memory is a tiny penalty compared to being trapped, unable to upgrade web service when another service relies on the same library(and is incompatible with newer versions). (Or replace service with webapp) -Tim Javier Gonzalez wrote: Actually, I don't - this server provides web services only and *very small* set of reports pages, so going through the hassle of setting up Apache in front of tomcat wasn't deemed to be worth it. It doesn't have any impact on performance? I would have thought that multiple contexts would eventually lead to duplicated libraries which would ultimately lead to wasting memory. Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. On 6/7/06, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a performance point of view - it doesn't matter. From a maintenaince point of view - I prefer many lean clients. That way - if one of them behaves badly - off they go into a new JVM (assuming you have apache in front of tomcat) - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat service stops
Hi, I've looked all over to try to find out what's going on with this particular server. I have a Javascript and Flash based program that uses Tomcat as an application server, Apache as the Web Server and MySQL as the database server. Occasionally, the following error pops up in the event logs: Event ID 4096 The Java Virtual Machine has exited with a code of 1, the service being stopped. And the Tomcat service stops and my app is hosed until the Tomcat service is manually restarted. Anyone have any ideas as to why this may be happening?, or can point me in another direction to look at? I do not claim to be any kind of developer and have no connection to the source code. Thanks in advance, Rich Software and hardware versions: Tomcat v4.1.31 Apache v1.39 MySQL v4.1.10a Java v5.0.20.9 HP Proliant DL360 G3 Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP1 4G RAM Richard Marr Harcourt Achieve/Steck-Vaughn 3rd Level Technical Support
Apache mod_jk JBoss Loadbalancing issue
Hi, We are facing a problem with respect to load balancing using mod_jk. I surfed through various mailing lists and otehr websites for a couple of days but could find nothing that could help me resolve the issue. I got your mail id from one of these archives and that is why I am sending you this email. The scenario is as follows: We have one Apache server (2.0.55) and two Jboss servers (jboss-4.0.3SP1). One of the Jboss instances is on the same server that has the Apache. The setup is on AIX machines. We have done the necessary configuration required to have the load balancing in place but when we do a load test the load is going to only one server (incidently it is the same server that also runs the apache server). If I shutdown this instance oif JBoss, then the load goes to the other server. The version of mod_jk that we are using is: 1.2.15 The contents from relevant files are mentioned below. Pls could you have a look and let me know what is it that I am missing. Thanks and regards Sanjeev workers.properties # Define list of workers that will be used # for mapping requests worker.list=loadbalancer,status #worker.list=node1 # Define Node1 # modify the host as your host IP or DNS name. worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=168.146.16.215 worker.node1.type=ajp13 worker.node1.lbfactor=1 worker.node1.cachesize=10 # Define Node2 # modify the host as your host IP or DNS name. worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=168.146.16.214 worker.node2.type=ajp13 worker.node2.lbfactor=1 worker.node2.cachesize=10 # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status httpd.conf relevant section VirtualHost 168.146.16.215:80 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerName oldtut012.pearsontc.net DocumentRoot /usr1/app/apache/htdocs/oldtut012 DirectoryIndex index.html index.jsp ErrorLog /usr1/logs/oldtut012-error_log CustomLog /usr1/logs/oldtut012-access_log common JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer JkMount /web-console loadbalancer JkMount /web-console/* loadbalancer JkMount /jmx-console loadbalancer JkMount /jmx-console/* loadbalancer JkMount /pims loadbalancer JkMount /pims/*.jsp loadbalancer JkMount /pims/*.do loadbalancer /VirtualHost jboss-service.xml attribute name=UseJKtrue/attribute server.xml (First) Engine name=jboss.web defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=node2 server.xml(Second) Engine name=jboss.web defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=node1 DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. ---
What triggers jspDestroy?
I have a page that renders a very large report using the apache jstl tags. When the page has finished running, my memory usage jumps up 70MB. Even if I force a full garbage collection (verified in my garbage collector log), memory usage does not decrease. There is no data being cached or stored in the user's session, it's simply dumped into the request and rendered by the JSP. I've found that if I un-deploy the war and force a full garbage collection, memory usage drops 70MB. I've also found that after waiting about 30 minutes, the memory is released. When I did memory snapshots before and after running that page, I could still see the page exists in memory (org.apache.jsp.ContactReport_jsp) and appears to be holding on to that 70MB. From what I've read (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623) , it's seems like the memory that is used by the jstl foreach tag is not released until the page is destroyed. I'd like to verify this is truly the case and I'd also like to find out exactly what triggers the call to jspDestroy. Is there a timer, a thread, a memory threshold? Is there something I can/should configure to keep the page from eating up all of that memory for so long? I've tried disabling tag pooling, but that had no effect. Thanks!! _ Bob Damato Cox Target Media Internet Technology Manager Largo, Florida Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall. -- Confucius
Re: Apache mod_jk JBoss Loadbalancing issue
I think you need to define 2 workers, 1 for each instance of jboss. not 1 worker for 2 instances of jboss At 10:39 AM 6/9/2006, you wrote: Hi, We are facing a problem with respect to load balancing using mod_jk. I surfed through various mailing lists and otehr websites for a couple of days but could find nothing that could help me resolve the issue. I got your mail id from one of these archives and that is why I am sending you this email. The scenario is as follows: We have one Apache server (2.0.55) and two Jboss servers (jboss-4.0.3SP1). One of the Jboss instances is on the same server that has the Apache. The setup is on AIX machines. We have done the necessary configuration required to have the load balancing in place but when we do a load test the load is going to only one server (incidently it is the same server that also runs the apache server). If I shutdown this instance oif JBoss, then the load goes to the other server. The version of mod_jk that we are using is: 1.2.15 The contents from relevant files are mentioned below. Pls could you have a look and let me know what is it that I am missing. Thanks and regards Sanjeev workers.properties # Define list of workers that will be used # for mapping requests worker.list=loadbalancer,status #worker.list=node1 # Define Node1 # modify the host as your host IP or DNS name. worker.node1.port=8009 worker.node1.host=168.146.16.215 worker.node1.type=ajp13 worker.node1.lbfactor=1 worker.node1.cachesize=10 # Define Node2 # modify the host as your host IP or DNS name. worker.node2.port=8009 worker.node2.host=168.146.16.214 worker.node2.type=ajp13 worker.node2.lbfactor=1 worker.node2.cachesize=10 # Load-balancing behaviour worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2 worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 # Status worker for managing load balancer worker.status.type=status httpd.conf relevant section VirtualHost 168.146.16.215:80 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerName oldtut012.pearsontc.net DocumentRoot /usr1/app/apache/htdocs/oldtut012 DirectoryIndex index.html index.jsp ErrorLog /usr1/logs/oldtut012-error_log CustomLog /usr1/logs/oldtut012-access_log common JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer JkMount /web-console loadbalancer JkMount /web-console/* loadbalancer JkMount /jmx-console loadbalancer JkMount /jmx-console/* loadbalancer JkMount /pims loadbalancer JkMount /pims/*.jsp loadbalancer JkMount /pims/*.do loadbalancer /VirtualHost jboss-service.xml attribute name=UseJKtrue/attribute server.xml (First) Engine name=jboss.web defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=node2 server.xml(Second) Engine name=jboss.web defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=node1 DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. --- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database Persistance And Session Replication
Hey everybody, I would like to configure Tomcat for both session replication across 3 servers and database session persistence. The database persistence lags several seconds which is why I don't think that I can simply replicate sessions over many servers using the database. I can get the sessions to persist to the database using org.apache.catalina.session.PersistentManager, and I can get session to replicate in memory using org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager, but how to I use both at the same time? Here is server.xml with the in-memory replication that works: Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN Service name=Catalina Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector port=80 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true address=192.168.0.250 redirectPort=443/ Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=tomcat Host name=tomcat appBase=webapps Cluster className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.SimpleTcpCluster managerClassName=org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager expireSessionsOnShutdown=false debug=true useDirtyFlag=false Membership className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.mcast.McastService mcastAddr=228.0.0.4 mcastPort=45564 mcastFrequency=500 mcastDropTime=3000/ Receiver className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationListener tcpListenAddress=192.168.0.250 tcpListenPort=4001 tcpSelectorTimeout=100 tcpThreadCount=6/ Sender className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationTransmitter replicationMode=pooled/ Valve className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationValve filter=.*\.gif;.*\.js;.*\.jpg;.*\.htm;.*\.html;.*\.txt;/ Deployer className=org.apache.catalina.cluster.deploy.FarmWarDeployer tempDir=/tmp/war-temp/ deployDir=/tmp/war-deploy/ watchDir=/tmp/war-listen/ watchEnabled=false/ Context path= docBase=. !-- Manager className=org.apache.catalina.session.PersistentManager distributable=true debug=10 checkInterval=1 saveOnRestart=true maxActiveSessions=-1 minIdleSwap=-1 maxIdleSwap=1 maxIdleBackup=1 Store className=org.apache.catalina.session.JDBCStore debug=100 connectionURL=jdbc:mysql://192.168.0.253/tomcat?user=abcamp;password=efg driverName=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver sessionDataCol=session_data sessionAppCol=app_name sessionIdCol=session_id sessionLastAccessedCol=last_access sessionMaxInactiveCol=max_inactive sessionTable=tomcat_sessions sessionValidCol=valid_session /Store /Manager -- /Context /Cluster /Host /Engine /Service /Server -- David Ron IT Director - BandMerch 5126 Clareton Drive #140 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 877-502-3728 x5201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to pass advanced GC options to tomcat 5.5.16 on windows XP running with IIS
Tomcat 5.5.16 Java 1.5.0_06 IIS I'm trying to pass some advanced GC options to tomcat. I've tried putting GC options such as -verbose:gc and -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio=40 into the registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SOFTWARE Apache Software Foundation Procrun 2.0 MyWebApp Parameters Java Params I'm using the usual tomcat5w.exe //ES// interface (aka prunmgr) to specify the options and put them into the registry. The options are going into the registry as expected, but they seem to be ignored when Tomcat starts. When I put in some illegal options Tomcat fails to start, so it's not that I'm putting options in the wrong place in the registry. -verbose:gc and -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio seem to be ignored, possibly because procrun may ignore all but -D and -X (implied by http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/procrun.html but unspecific on whether -XX is included under -X); or possibly because the documentation I've been following describes itself as obsolete (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/windows-service-howto.html). Suggestions greatly appreciated, including pointers to relevant docs. David Hornig Touchtown Inc. 215 Allegheny Ave., Oakmont PA 15139 412-826-0460 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email www.hq.touchtown.us - our corporate website www.touchtown.tv - our TV+ service - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to install php on tomcat?
I know nothing about php, so this may be a dumb question, but how do I add php support to tomcat? thanks -nikita - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to install php on tomcat?
On 6/9/06, Nikita Tovstoles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know nothing about php, so this may be a dumb question, but how do I add php support to tomcat? A PHP servlet can be built from source in PHP4; last time I looked that feature wasn't in PHP5. But I haven't looked in quite a while :-) The PHP4 servlet worked, but wasn't all that stable, in my limited experience. And when it crashed it took the whole JVM with it, so I didn't think it suitable for production. YMMV. HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to install php on tomcat?
A better idea would be to put Apache in from of Tomcat and compile PHP into that. There are instructions on the PHP site on how to do that: http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.php -Original Message- From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:16 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: how to install php on tomcat? On 6/9/06, Nikita Tovstoles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know nothing about php, so this may be a dumb question, but how do I add php support to tomcat? A PHP servlet can be built from source in PHP4; last time I looked that feature wasn't in PHP5. But I haven't looked in quite a while :-) The PHP4 servlet worked, but wasn't all that stable, in my limited experience. And when it crashed it took the whole JVM with it, so I didn't think it suitable for production. YMMV. HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to install php on tomcat?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The most common and apparently more stable approach appears to use Apache to run PHP apps with Tomcat connected through mod_jk to run Java/JSP/etc. apps. -= Gregg =- Hassan Schroeder wrote: On 6/9/06, Nikita Tovstoles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know nothing about php, so this may be a dumb question, but how do I add php support to tomcat? A PHP servlet can be built from source in PHP4; last time I looked that feature wasn't in PHP5. But I haven't looked in quite a while :-) The PHP4 servlet worked, but wasn't all that stable, in my limited experience. And when it crashed it took the whole JVM with it, so I didn't think it suitable for production. YMMV. HTH! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEie6rMcSsEtbyA2cRAn32AJ9xOVIDE8pvQn+Oiwafd3XxCt8GvQCfZOT4 OFE78z24pDPhp45ME5YJrtw= =FRz9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to install php on tomcat?
On 6/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A better idea would be to put Apache in from of Tomcat and compile PHP into that. And an even better idea, if you *must* have PHP, would be to run Apache *alongside* Tomcat on a separate IP, and not add pointless complication to your operating environment. IMHO :-) -- Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
authentication problem deploying app to tomcat via ant
Hi,
I am trying to manage my tomcat webapp via ant, that is, start it, stop
it, list apps, etc. But I keep bumping up against an authentication
problem.
I have read this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/manager-howto.html#Configuring%20Manager%20Application%20Access
and several other similar documents and related FAQs, etc., but am
finding nothing that ties the error to this particular situation.
I have these and some other similar snippets in my build.xml:
property name=tomcat.home location=/opt/tomcat/
property name=tomcat.manager.url
value=http://localhost:8080/manager/
property name=tomcat.manager.username value=/
property name=tomcat.manager.password value=y/
taskdef name=list classname=org.apache.catalina.ant.ListTask
classpath
path location=${tomcat.home}/server/lib/catalina-ant.jar/
/classpath
/taskdef
target name=list description=List Tomcat applications
list url=${tomcat.manager.url}
username=${tomcat.manager.username}
password=${tomcat.manager.password}/
/target
Ant's [tidied] output is this (I may have munged the html):
list:
[list] htmlheadtitleApache Tomcat/5.0.30 - Error
report/titlestyle h1HTTP Status 401 - /h1 btype/b Status
report/ppbmessage/b u/u/ppbdescription/b uThis
request requires HTTP authentication ()./u
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 1 second
I've checked the username and password multiple times against
tomcat-users.xml so I believe they are correct. (I didn't have it right
at first, and the error then was Connection refused. That error went
away after I corrected them, so I think they are right now.)
I'm using java 1.5, tomcat 5.0.30, and ant 1.6.5 on Linux Fedora Core 5.
Any insights, suggestions or tips would be greatly appreciated!
TIA!
Anne
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
