RE: [ANN] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello Richard, Great news  I haven't checked everything but, at least, the jose upgrade from 0.9.3 to 0.9.6 is missing in the release note  Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Richard Zowalla Sent: lundi 15 avril 2024

RE: [ANN] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, This is indeed great news and congrats for this delivery. Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Richard Zowalla Sent: lundi 8 avril 2024 10:15 To: annou...@apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org;

RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

INF to root\WEB-INF\classes\META-INF and everything works as expected  Lesson learned: we have to read the specifications  Best Regards. -Original Message----- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: jeudi 4 avril 2024 15:40 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-pr

RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

   .expiration(new Date(now + EXPIRATION))     .signWith(decodedKeyPair.getPrivate())     .compact();     } catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException | InvalidKeySpecException ex) {     log.error("Exception at generateToken");     }  

RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

From: Tichov Zoltán Sent: jeudi 4 avril 2024 11:48 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor Hi Francois! I think that the "alg" : "RSA256" is more important in the token header than the "type". Best regards: Zoltán 2024.

RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

with "alg" : "RSA256" and "type" : "JWT". Best regards: Zoltán 2024. 04. 04. 11:18 keltezéssel, COURTAULT Francois írta: THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello Victor, I use this library: org.bitbucket.b_c jo

RE: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

Subject: Re: JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor Hi Francois! How did you generate the token? Best regards 2024. 04. 04. 10:38 keltezéssel, COURTAULT Francois írta: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > I built a war with a class

JWT issue TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, I built a war with a class which extends Application and annotated with @LoginConfig(authMethod = "MP-JWT") I have created a signed JWT which is OK when I validated it (public key provided) using jwt.io web site I want to

RE: Second issue with simple rest application on TomEE 9.1.2

Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 3:51 AM COURTAULT Francois wrote: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > Context: TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor. > > I have raised an issue in another POST (Some issues with simple rest > application). > >

RE: Some issues with simple rest application

was expecting was missing. I fix that and everything works fine now  Best Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: mercredi 3 avril 2024 16:28 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: Some issues with simple rest application THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION

RE: Some issues with simple rest application

chard Am Montag, dem 01.04.2024 um 20:15 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > After having read the Jakarta Restful 3.0 specification. > I want to check how it works. > > For that I have built

RE: Some issues with simple rest application

he.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener.logEndpoints GET http://localhost:8080/JAXRS/openapi -> OpenAPI get() This time I am able to see a GET on a path with myresource  So big issue on TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile ? Best Regards. -Original Message-

Second issue with simple rest application on TomEE 9.1.2

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Context: TomEE 9.1.2 micro-profile flavor. I have raised an issue in another POST (Some issues with simple rest application). This time: * I add a new class which extends Application. @ApplicationPath("myapp") public

RE: Some issues with simple rest application

on the automatic resource scanning tomee.mp.scan = all On Mon, Apr 1, 2024, 1:16 PM COURTAULT Francois wrote: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > After having read the Jakarta Restful 3.0 specification. > I want to check how it works. > > For

Some issues with simple rest application

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, After having read the Jakarta Restful 3.0 specification. I want to check how it works. For that I have built a web application (war) without any Application subclass. According to the specification, I have to add a servlet

RE: TomEE system.properties : tomee.mp.scan doc/meaning

d deeper though. [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/main/tomee/tomee-microprofile/mp-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/microprofile/TomEEMicroProfileListener.java#L75 On 2024/03/15 10:27:11 COURTAULT Francois wrote: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hel

CVE-2023-51775 in jose library embedded in TomEE 9.1.2

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, The CVE 2023-51775 (Sonatype CVSS 3: 8.6) has been raised end of February 2024. jose4j-0.9.3.jar has this vulnerability. Is it safe/ok to replace this version by jose4j-0.9.6.jar released the 6th of March 2024 ? Best

RE: TomEE system.properties : tomee.mp.scan doc/meaning

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Any answers/comments ? Best Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: jeudi 7 mars 2024 17:07 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: TomEE system.properties : tomee.mp.scan doc/meaning THALES

Will Tomee be discontinued ?

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Will we have at some point TomEE 10.x ? Best Regards.

RE: TomEE system.properties : tomee.mp.scan doc/meaning

rc/main/java/org/apache/tomee/microprofile/TomEEMicroProfileListener.java#L73 Am Mittwoch, dem 06.03.2024 um 15:29 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > Is there somewhere a doc describing the system proper

TomEE system.properties : tomee.mp.scan doc/meaning

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Is there somewhere a doc describing the system property tomee.mp.scan ? any default value if missing ? what are the possible values with their meanings ? What if the tomee.mp.scan is set to none ? what would happen in such

Migration doc from TomEE 8.x to TomEE 9.x

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Is there any document somewhere which describes the way to migrate our applications from TomEE 8.x to TomEE 9.x ? I saw that there is some tool available at Tomcat site like "Tomcat Migration Tool for Jakarta EE 1.0.8

RE: Error when starting up TomEE Plus 9.1.2

provided by Bernd Bohmann. (markt) El vie, 16 feb 2024 a las 10:59, COURTAULT Francois () escribió: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, > > A person who has left the company add this line in the > catalina

Test

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Test

Error when starting up TomEE Plus 9.1.2

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, A person who has left the company add this line in the catalina.properties file: org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.PROPERTY_SOURCE=org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester$EnvironmentPropertySource Reading at Tomcat 8.5 doc, I

RE: TomeEE official maven repo

/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/ The Tomee 9.1.2 jar is located at https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/9.1.2/apache-tomee-9.1.2.jar a I can not answer the "official TomEE maven repos" question. Paul Spencer On 2024/01/08 12:53:17 COURTAULT Francois wrote: >

TomeEE official maven repo

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Could someone confirm or not to me that the official TomEE maven repos is https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/tomee/apache-tomee/ If the answer is no then what is the official TomEE maven repo ? If the answer is

TomEE 10 in the pipe or not ?

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, The question is the subject. Advantage I foresee: rely on Tomcat 10.1.x instead of Tomcat 10.0.27 and being able to experiment virtual thread on java 21. Best Regards.

RE: TomEE 9.x relies on Tomcat 10.0.27 but this one is quite old ...

ve to Tomcat 10.1.x on > TomEE 9.x. TomEE 10.x is in progress. Any contributions you wanted to > make would be most welcome. > > Jon > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:29 PM COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recip

RE: TomEE 9.x relies on Tomcat 10.0.27 but this one is quite old ...

. So from a spec perspective, there is currently no plan to migrate TomEE 9.x to Tomcat 10.1.x (without breaking the tck). Gruß Richard Am Montag, dem 13.11.2023 um 11:30 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients > > Hello everyone, >

TomEE 9.x relies on Tomcat 10.0.27 but this one is quite old ...

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, According to this link https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-10.0-eol.html Tomcat 10.0.x is EOL, right? But TomEE 9.1.1 still rely on Tomcat 10.0.x. Any plan to migrate TomEE 9.x to Tomcat 10.1.x ? Best Regards.

Issue with NexusIQ and TomEE

THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients Hello everyone, Quite recently I run NexusIQ on TomEE Plus 8.0.15. The tool reports a vulnerability on commons-collections--3.2.1. Issue: in TomEE delivery there is no commons-collections--3.2.1 ☹ So we opened a ticket to NexusIQ support.

TomEE Java version supported

Hello, Looking at https://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/docs/installing-tomee.html It seems that TomEE 8.0.x might run on java 6 and 7: someone could confirm ? But at https://tomee.apache.org/ It is written "Runs on Java 8 or higher." Does it mean that TomEE running on Java 8 and superior, up to

RE: Approx. release date for TomEE 10.x

at 11.x. It's not the first time, there was also Tomcat 8.5.x. Some get discontinued, some versions get added in the middle as it fits the project and that's ok. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 12:18 PM COURTAULT Fra

RE: Approx. release date for TomEE 10.x

Hello Richard, You haven't the choice right ? You have to do that: qualifying TomEE 9.x on Tomcat 10.1.x. In order to avoid any confusion, it could be also nice to align on the version meaning TomEE 10 runing Tomcat 10.1.x and TomEE 11 runing Tomcat 11 (M4 as of today). Just my 2 cents.

Method annotated with @GET questions

Hello everyone, Is it relevant to annotate a @GET method with @Consumes knowing that it's not advised to have a payload for HTTP GET request even if it is not forbidden by the specification if I have well understood ? I ask this question because I have performed some tests with TomEE 8.0.14

RE: CVE-2016-3088

e.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2016-3088-ann > ouncement.txt > > Am Freitag, dem 27.01.2023 um 18:05 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > > Hello everyone, > > > > We scan the vulnerabilities in TomEE Plus 8.0.14 and we have > > discovered the following CVE: CVE-

CVE-2016-3088

Hello everyone, We scan the vulnerabilities in TomEE Plus 8.0.14 and we have discovered the following CVE: CVE-2016-3088 which prevent us to use this version :( It seems it is due to activemq-protobuf-1.1.jar. The question: Is the ActiveMQ Fileserver web application deployed in TomEE 8.0.14

Behaviour change between TomEE 8.0.12 and TomEE 8.0.13

Hello, I have a REST WS endpoint with the annotation @Path( v1/xxx/{ZZZ}" ) Using TomEE 8.0.11, if I target v1/xxx, I get a 404 but with TomEE 8.0.13, I get a 500. Are you aware of this issue ? Is it a bug according to you ? Best Regards.

Behaviour change between TomEE 8.0.11 and TomEE 8.0.13

Hello, I have a REST WS endpoint with the annotation @Path( v1/xxx/{ZZZ}" ) Using TomEE 8.0.11, if I target v1/xxx, I get a 404 but with TomEE 8.0.13, I get a 500. Are you aware of this issue ? Is it a bug according to you ? Best Regards.

RE: Tomee 8.0.13 and Java Mail

can just switch the mailing library used in TomEE and replace it with the RI. Gruß Richard Am Montag, dem 21.11.2022 um 15:38 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > Hello everyone, > > Does TomEE 8.0.13 support proxy authentication properties for Session > object for sending emails

Tomee 8.0.13 and Java Mail

Hello everyone, Does TomEE 8.0.13 support proxy authentication properties for Session object for sending emails ? Through the following properties: *mail.smtp.proxy.host *mail.smtp.proxy.port *mail.smtp.proxy.user *mail.smtp.proxy.password ? Best Regards.

RE: TomEE 9

. Sorry to not being able to give something more precise for you. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 5:59 PM COURTAULT Francois wrote: > Hello, > > Any release date for TomEE 9 ? > > Best Regards. > > > >

RE: TomEE 9

Thanks David for you feedback :-) -Original Message- From: David Blevins Sent: jeudi 3 novembre 2022 18:38 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: TomEE 9 > On Nov 3, 2022, at 9:59 AM, COURTAULT Francois wrote: > > Hello, > > Any release date for TomEE 9 ? No

TomEE 9

Hello, Any release date for TomEE 9 ? Best Regards.

Request timeout

Hello everyone, I know that this question has most probably to be sent to Tomcat mailing list but as I haven't subscribed to this one I try on the TomEE mailing list. Looking at the Tomcat doc, I see a connectionTimeout parameter but this one is not really a "request timeout" I mean by

RE: TomEE 8.0.9 introduce ehcache-3.8.1.jar in lib folder

Hello, Jean-Louis asked you to try with the latest TomEE version : 8.0.12. Best Regards. -Original Message- From: David Bonnafous Sent: vendredi 29 juillet 2022 00:09 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: TomEE 8.0.9 introduce ehcache-3.8.1.jar in lib folder hi,

RE: [ANN] Apache TomEE 8.0.11

Congratulation. -Original Message- From: Jean-Louis Monteiro Sent: vendredi 22 avril 2022 12:48 To: users@tomee.apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache TomEE 8.0.11 Thanks so much Richard. Good job Le ven. 22 avr. 2022 à 12:02, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > The

When TomEE will support µProfile 4.x and 5.x ?

Hello, Is there a TomEE roadmap which include µProfile 4.x or 5.x specifications ? We are still stuck with µProfile 2.x :( Best Regards.

TOMEE-3804

Hello, Could you have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3804 , please and tell me if it's a bug or not ? Best Regards.

RE: Is the new TomEE version 8.0.8 certified on JDK 17 ?

ot; ;) Am Mittwoch, dem 15.09.2021 um 08:33 +0000 schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > Hello, > > So TomEE 8.0.8 is certified on JDK 16 but not yet on JDK 17: is this > correct ? > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message- > From: Zowalla, Richard > Sent: merc

RE: Is the new TomEE version 8.0.8 certified on JDK 17 ?

how it could > not > be the case. > > Alex > > Le mer. 15 sept. 2021 à 08:35, COURTAULT Francois > a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > The question I want to ask is in the email Subject. > > > > Best Regards. > > > > > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Is the new TomEE version 8.0.8 certified on JDK 17 ?

Hello, The question I want to ask is in the email Subject. Best Regards.

RE: Is WSS (Web Service Security) supported in TomEE Plus flavor ?

. 2021 à 13:55, COURTAULT Francois a écrit : > Hello, > > My guess is yes but I prefer to ask the question in order to have an > official answer. > > Best regards. > > > >

Is WSS (Web Service Security) supported in TomEE Plus flavor ?

Hello, My guess is yes but I prefer to ask the question in order to have an official answer. Best regards.

RE: Any new releases coming out ?

ox/tomee-dev/202109.mbox/%3CCAPk > io3EHvmmPNo-kJrpGVFyZXUibsMLuceERvwxEnqqVSABCjQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > Vote is running. > > Am Freitag, dem 03.09.2021 um 06:42 + schrieb COURTAULT Francois: > > Hello, > > > > The question is in the subject. > > > >

Any new releases coming out ?

Hello, The question is in the subject. *9.0.0-M7 since May 2021 *8.0.6 since January 2021 with a wrong 8.0.7 At least, for this branch, when 8.0.8 will be released ? Best Regards.

RE: TomEE 8.0.7 withdraw

the others - we need to somehow find a way to release all the other jars, so we can use EJBContainer, ApplicationComposer, Arquillian with EE 9 and jakarta namespace -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 7:13 PM COURTAULT Francois

TomEE 8.0.7 withdraw

Hello, So I think we have 2 possibilities: *wait for a 8.0.8 release *wait for the 9.0 to be released According to you, what is the best strategy ? Another question: what about having a TomEE native image ? Are you working on it ? Best Regards.

RE: [ANN] Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7, Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile Certification Achieved

Hello everyone, Great achievement !!! Congratulation. David you mentioned "MicroProfile specifications", may I know which MP specification version(s) is(are) implemented this release ? Can we expect to have MP 3.x or MP4.x covered at some point ? Best Regards. -Original Message-

RE: I have seen 9.0.0-M7 on the download site ...;

-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomee-dev/202105.mbox/%3CFF0DDEDC-BE1A-4305-B737-4125DB7CA194%40gmail.com%3E Or on Jira: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3743 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3743 Hope it helps. Gruss Richard Am Dienstag, den 18.05.2021, 15:14 + schrieb COURTAULT

I have seen 9.0.0-M7 on the download site ...;

Hello everyone, What about 8.0.7 ? when will it be available on the download site? On github, it seems that 8.0.7 has been released since 15 days ago ? ActiveMQ 5.17 will be JMS 2.0, RC end of June. I suppose it is planned to include this version in TomEE, right ? Regarding TCK results on TomEE

RE: IIOP tunelling over HTTP

PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > Thanks for answering :-) > I found this link > http://tomee.apache.org/latest/docs/ejbd-transport.html > but it seems rot really recent (reference to 1.7.x). > Is this link qui

RE: IIOP tunelling over HTTP

ward way, without needing to open up other ports. Hope that helps. Jon On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:00 PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Previously we were using Welogic. In one of our use-case, we performed > a remote EJB (so u

IIOP tunelling over HTTP

Hello everyone, Previously we were using Welogic. In one of our use-case, we performed a remote EJB (so using iiop) call to the our customer backend over the internet. Because of some firewall issue we might have, we use http tunneling iiop to perform this call. Do you know if we can do the

RE: TomeEE 8.0.5 and microprofile JWT RBAC 1.1

so it sits in the "someday" pile. Hope that helps. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Dec 18, 2020, at 2:18 AM, COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > Hello, > > Could anyone answer to the questions below ? > Thank

RE: TomeEE 8.0.5 and microprofile JWT RBAC 1.1

Hello, Could anyone answer to the questions below ? Thanks in advance. Best Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois [mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com] Sent: vendredi 11 décembre 2020 18:23 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: TomeEE 8.0.5 and microprofile JWT RBAC

TomeEE 8.0.5 and microprofile JWT RBAC 1.1

Hello everyone, Is TomEE 8.0.5 certified for micro-profile JWT 1.1 ? Looking at the lib embedded, microprofile-jwt-auth-api-1.1.1.jar, I would say yes, but I prefer to check. BTW, it's a recurrent question I have: what is the micro-profile version on which TomEE 8.0.5 is certified ? The

RE: [ANN] Apache TomEE 8.0.2, 7.1.3, 7.0.8

Hello Jonathan, Congrats for these new versions :-) BTW, I have seen that some potential bugs I have submitted are not fixed. When do you think these potential fixes will be released ? in the next version 8.0.3 ? 8.1.x ? And what about following more recent MP specs ? Best Regards.

RE: Is there a way to monitor, using JMX (jconsole), MDB pool ?

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:04 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Cesar, > > Definitively not under the Pool folder which is, for me, the logical > location where to find it as Stateless Session Bean pool is there. > The only entry I

RE: Is there a way to monitor, using JMX (jconsole), MDB pool ?

onsole? El mar., 18 feb. 2020 a las 7:29, COURTAULT Francois (< francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>) escribió: > Hello everyone, > > Using the jconsole, I am able to monitor the SLSB pools under the Pool > folder. > But I am not able to monitor the MDB pools under the Pool fol

Is there a way to monitor, using JMX (jconsole), MDB pool ?

Hello everyone, Using the jconsole, I am able to monitor the SLSB pools under the Pool folder. But I am not able to monitor the MDB pools under the Pool folder. Is there any other location to look at ? Best Regards.

Same issue than TOMEE-2770 but using the JMS 1.1 api

Hello everyone, TOMEE-2781 Best Regards.

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

Hello, Is there someone to answer to this question: " Could you confirm that if we haven't this entry in the system.properties or set to none then all MP specifications are disabled at runtime ? " Best Regards. -Original Message----- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: mercredi

RE: Removing cxf fault

(FaultListener.class.getName(), new NoOpFaultListener()); } public void handleFault(final Message message) { // no-op } } and in the resource class: @OutInterceptors(classes = MyInterceptor.class) It doesn't work :( Best Regards. From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: vendredi 14 février 2020 18:15

Removing cxf fault

Hello everyone, Do you know how to disable the cxf fault in TomEE ? Sample below: 14-Feb-2020 17:49:57.425 WARNING [MyJmsResourceAdapter-worker- - 5] org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doDefault Logging Interceptor for {http://www.apache.org/}WebClient has thrown exception, unwinding

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois [mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com] Sent: mercredi 12 février 2020 09:51 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption Hello Jonathan I will do so (Jira). BTW, is this property tomee.mp.scan

RE: TOMEE-2770

Hello Richard, Have you been able to reproduce the issue ? Best Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: mardi 11 février 2020 10:42 To: users@tomee.apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: TOMEE-2770 Hello Richard, It's really easy to reproduce. Just

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

memory consumption Awesome, thanks for the feedback. We'd still want to fix the actual issue. If you get time, if you can file a JIRA, that would be great. Jon On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:01 PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > >

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

in system.properties !!! Best Regards. -Original Message- From: COURTAULT Francois Sent: mardi 11 février 2020 10:32 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption Hello Jonathan, As I have mentioned, we see the issue in TomEE MP but not in TomEE Plus ! So I did

RE: TOMEE-2770

it will be much easier to dig into this issue. Best Richard Von: COURTAULT Francois [francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com] Gesendet: Montag, 10. Februar 2020 12:51 An: users@tomee.apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org Betreff: RE: TOMEE-2770 Hello Jonathan,

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

? Its a setting in the Geronimo OpenTracing project: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-opentracing. Try setting geronimo.opentracing.filter.active to false (an entry in conf/system.properties should do the trick). Jon On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:46 PM COURTAULT Francois < franco

RE: TomEE microprofile memory consumption

how to reproduce with a small sample would be helpful. Memory dumps tend to be quite large and contain confidential information, so we prefer to not exchange those on the list. Jon On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 5:10 PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, &

TomEE microprofile memory consumption

Hello everyone, We have 2 microservices: one using TomEE Plus and the other using TomEE MP. These 2 µS don't use at all OpenTracing features: no @Trace We have no memory issue with the µS using TomEE Plus. This is strange because TomEE Plus somehow is a superset of TomEE MP. The issue is

RE: TOMEE-2770

: *jmsContext*.createProducer().send(*messageQueue*, *jmsContext* .createTextMessage(*"Test"*)); in a heap dump you see a number of producers that aren't being cleared up? Jon On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:20 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote:

TOMEE-2770

Hello everyone, Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2770 please ? This is blocking for us :( Best Regards.

ActiveMQ latest release in TomEE

Hello, In TomEE 8.0.1 Plus, ActiveMQ 5.15.10 is included. Do you plan to integrate ActiveMQ 5.15.11 at least (5.16.0 currently in dev) in the next TomEE release ? Best Regards.

RE: Docker images for 8.0.0

Sorry my apologies . Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Tobias Erdle [mailto:tobi.er...@gmail.com] Sent: lundi 20 janvier 2020 14:28 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: Docker images for 8.0.0 Hi again, it would be really great not to hijack this thread for further discussions

RE: Docker images for 8.0.0

, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:54 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > If I have well understood: TomEE 9 will manage the latest MP (eg 3.2 > or superior), right ? When the master branch will become the 9 version ? > I don't know th

RE: Docker images for 8.0.0

: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com] Sent: lundi 20 janvier 2020 12:46 To: users@tomee.apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: Docker images for 8.0.0 On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:07 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello

RE: Docker images for 8.0.0

Hello Jonathan, As MP is quite important for us, what is the MP compliancy new version ? 2.2 ? 3.x? I guess it should be 2.2. The 3.x compliancy should be targeted in TomEE 8.1.x branch, right ? Has this branch ever started ? Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Gallimore

RE: CXF CVE-2019-17573 and CVE-2019-12423

ly I'd > like to try and release more frequently (like monthly), but if the > process takes multiple weeks, that's unlikely to happen. > > We still need 1 more binding +1 on the existing votes, so I'd > encourage PMC members to cast a vote. > > Jon > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at

CXF CVE-2019-17573 and CVE-2019-12423

Hello TomEE guys, If it's not too late before releasing next TomEE version, could you take into account the CXF team advice to migrate from 3.3.x to 3.3.5 ? Current TomEE 8.0.0 release uses CXF 3.3.2. Best Regards.

RE: tomee 8.0.0

Hello Matthew, Just look at startup log, you have the info . Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Matthew Broadhead [mailto:matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk.INVALID] Sent: mardi 14 janvier 2020 10:50 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: tomee 8.0.0 is TomEE using Tomcat 9.0 or is it

RE: Issue with TomEE 8 on Open JDK 11

up and verify, that would be amazing. Release-wise - I think we're overdue. I'll try and carve out some time to get those up for a vote. Jon On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:24 PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > No. I didn't tr

RE: Issue with TomEE 8 on Open JDK 11

décembre 2019 16:17 To: users@tomee.apache.org Cc: d...@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with TomEE 8 on Open JDK 11 I believe its already been fixed. Could you try a recent snapshot? Thanks Jon On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:14 PM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>

Issue with TomEE 8 on Open JDK 11

Hello everyone, We deployed an application which uses JAXB on TomEE Plus 8.0.0 using openjdk 11 and have no issue. Then I deployed the same application on TomEE Microprofile 8.0.0 using openjdk 11. In this case, the TomEE start failed. I got: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Error starting

RE: TomEE GraalVM native image

Jon On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:25 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> > wrote: Hello Jonathan, I would also consider, as the same priority level than Jakarta EE 8 compliancy, Micro Profile compliancy. I hope t

RE: TomEE GraalVM native image

se out, and then I'll hopefully be back to Jakarta EE 8. If others want to work on GraalVM native images for TomEE, that's great and contributions are welcome. I'll keep plugging away at Jakarta EE 8. Jon On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:35 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> wro

RE: TomEE - 8.0.0 - Release notes?

Hello, It should be also relevant to include in the Release notes the MicroProfile specifications that are covered (haven't check if it's already written or not). Best Regards. -Original Message- From: African Wild Dog [mailto:paintedlyc...@gmail.com] Sent: mercredi 13 novembre 2019

  1   2   3   >