Re: TomEE GraalVM native image

son-Haefel > wrote: > > Thanks, Roberto! So, compiling with it is probably not going to be a > priority, but running TomEE on it could be. I wonder if the > performance advantages of using GraalVM over JVM is significant. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:46 AM Roberto C

Re: TomEE GraalVM native image

Hi, Let me clarify that this repo: https://github.com/tomitribe/graalvm-microprofile Is just to play around with the polyglot features of GraalVM. Building TomEE native images will be another story. I did try that when I was playing with the

Re: Release date for TomEE 8

I think we still need to do a M3 first. I’ll see if I can find a couple of spare cycles to start that up. > On 20 Mar 2019, at 18:28, COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Any release date for TomEE 8 GA ? > > Best Regards. > > This message and

Re: TomEE Web vs TomEE MP vs TomEE Plus

e. > > Jon > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:04 PM COURTAULT Francois < > francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote: > >> Hello Roberto, >> >> Any release date for TomEE 8.0.0 final that, you or anyone from the dev >> list, may disclose ? >>

Re: TomEE Web vs TomEE MP vs TomEE Plus

> > Glad to hear that. When M3 release is scheduled ? > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Cortez [mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID] > Sent: vendredi 22 février 2019 18:48 > To: users@tomee.apache.org > Subject: Re: TomEE Web vs TomEE MP vs

Re: TomEE Web vs TomEE MP vs TomEE Plus

Hi Francois, You are right. We intended to add MP to Plus and Plume. Unfortunately, we had some integration issues and we had to pull it out before the M2 release. Right now, the master version has most of that work done and you should get MP on Plus and Plume in a M3. Cheers, Roberto > On 22

Re: TomEE 8.0.0-M2 no more available on download site ?

Hum, it seems the latest commit to the website reverted the M2 changes: https://github.com/apache/tomee-site/commit/16ac215501c66686c032be8161fd304d582d9f06#diff-368385bff4e5431dd1c86d3a7b9b1bf9 David, can you please help? Cheers, Roberto > On 18 Feb 2019, at 09:19, COURTAULT Francois > wrote

Re: Sanitizing the REST input payload

Hi Sudhakar, What really makes a difference is the Object type and Content-Type returned by your API. If it is XML or JSON, it should be escaped by default. Cheers, Roberto > On 4 Feb 2019, at 08:03, sudhakarvm wrote: > > Hi, > > We are using Jersey 2 and not overriding the default json seri

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/johnzon/jaxrs/jsonb/jaxrs/JsonbJaxrsProvider

ontained within this message. In such case you must > destroy this message and inform the sender of the error. Jini Guru may not > accept liability for any errors, omissions, information and viruses > contained in the transmission of this message. Any opinions, conclusions > and other i

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/johnzon/jaxrs/jsonb/jaxrs/JsonbJaxrsProvider

ated to Jini > Guru official business is deemed to be that of the individual only and is > not endorsed by Jini Guru. > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Roberto Cortez > wrote: > >> Ok, so false alarm? :) >> >>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 07:55, Paul C

Re: timer on docker unto netbeans 8.2 on ubuntu 18.04

Hi Mauro, I’m sorry, I never used Netbeans with Docker before. Are you able to run the image using Docker from the command line? Cheers, Roberto > On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:58, mauro2java2011 wrote: > > Hi all i installed docker in ubuntu 18.04. > Film the netbeans 8.2 I would get the image of

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/johnzon/jaxrs/jsonb/jaxrs/JsonbJaxrsProvider

Ok, so false alarm? :) > On 4 Feb 2019, at 07:55, Paul Carter-Brown > wrote: > > Sorry, please ignore this. My bad. > > Paul Carter-Brown > Director > Jini Guru > m: +27 (0) 83 442 7179 <+27834427179> > a: 1st Floor, Golf House, Design Quarter, Cnr. William Nicol and Leslie > Johannesburg, So

Re: Any reference to OpenTracing

Hi Francois, The Geronimo team skipped 1.0 Open Tracing implementation and went straight to 1.1, so TomEE 8.0.0-M1 already supported 1.1 which is backward compatible with 1.0, but since we were only MP 1.3 compliant, we mentioned that we had Open Tracing 1.0, but in reality it was 1.1. I hope

Re: JIRA TOMEE-2150

Hi Francois, I’m sorry. Indeed that issue is open for a long time and needs attention. Is someone out there available to pick this up? Cheers, Roberto > On 1 Feb 2019, at 18:24, COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have reported this a long time ago. > > When would I get a fix for

Re: Disable auto scanning for EJBs in a NON-EJB web application in Tomee

Hi, It seems that your issue might be related with this error log: SEVERE: FAIL ... Login: Missing required persistence.xml for @PersistenceContext ref "entityManager" to unit "auditLoggingPersistenceUnit” Do you have a persistence.xml added to your webapp? You need one if you want to use JPA

[ANNOUNCE] Apache TomEE 8.0.0-M2 Released

I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache TomEE 8.0.0-M2. This is an important milestone, since it provides support for MicroProfile 2.0, including Config, Fault Tolerance, Metrics, JWT Propagation, Health Check, Open Tracing, Open API and Rest Client. For a full list of changes, please che

Re: TomEE 7.1 release note issue ? and Metrics not working on TomEE 8.0.0 M1 ?

* cpu.systemLoadAverage > * cpu.processCpuLoad > > Should I submit a JIRA issue for that ? > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Cortez [mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID] > Sent: vendredi 4 janvier 2019 12:17 >

Re: TomEE 7.1 release note issue ? and Metrics not working on TomEE 8.0.0 M1 ?

IRA issue for that ? > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Cortez [mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID > <mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID>] > Sent: vendredi 4 janvier 2019 12:17 > To: users@tomee.apache.org <mailto:users@tomee.apache.org>

Re: TomEE 7.1 release note issue ? and Metrics not working on TomEE 8.0.0 M1 ?

0/mp-metrics, localhost:8080/mp-metrics/base, , > localhost:8080/mp-metrics-base but all of those return 404 :-( > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message- > From: Roberto Cortez [mailto:radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID] > Sent: jeudi 3 janvier 2019 20:01 > To: users@

Re: TomEE 7.1 release note issue ? and Metrics not working on TomEE 8.0.0 M1 ?

Hi Francois, You are right. Geronimo Metrics 1.0.0 implementation, unfortunately is not compatible with TomEE 7 due to CDI 2.0 requirement. The release notes are somehow misleading. We had the task there to add it, and we tried until we found the issue, so the issue was resolved as Incomplete.

Re: ActiveMQ websocket transport in TomEE 7

ll JSR356 > implementation. > > I think that using a standalone activemq server as a proxy is my only > remaining option. > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Roberto Cortez" > An: users@tomee.apache.org > Gesendet: Montag, 24. Dezember 2018 13:29:2

Re: ActiveMQ websocket transport in TomEE 7

(ActiveMQ5Factory.java:99) > ~[?:?] > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > ~[?:1.8.0_162] > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > ~[?:1.8.0_162] > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMeth

Re: ActiveMQ websocket transport in TomEE 7

Hi Thomas, Can you please detail what dependencies did you add? Cheers, Roberto > On 20 Dec 2018, at 16:31, Thomas Butz wrote: > > I'm currently trying to setup the ActiveMQ websocket transport for our > applicationserver (TomEE 7.0.4) > So far i've added all needed dependencies but jettys >

Re: Getting exceptions in using TOMEE

Hi Karen, Thank you for reaching out. Indeed, it seems you adding a lot of dependencies to your project that you don’t need. The javaee-api should be enough. For TomEE you would actually use the following: org.apache.tomee javaee-api 8.0

Re: @Ejb is not allowed in this location

ith Eclipse Oxygen so that I can test the CDI stuff > and TomEE. > > Tks & regards, > Karen > -------- > On Mon, 12/17/18, Roberto Cortez wrote: > > Subject: Re: @Ejb is not allowed in this location > To: users@tomee.apache.org,

Re: @Ejb is not allowed in this location

Hi Karen, Can you please try to place the Tutor definition as a field variable of the class and annotate it with the @EJB? Cheers, Roberto > On 16 Dec 2018, at 02:12, Karen Goh wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to use this example below a a guide but it says @Ejb is not > allowed in this locat

Re: TomEE Maven Plugin: Can conf/system.properties be externalized?

I guess you want to hide user, password, connection, schema etc. You could use variable replacement with ${} and pack the file in the jar and then just set the properties to replace like Romain mentioned. I think it should work, Cheers, Roberto > On 22 Nov 2018, at 05:42, Romain Manni-Bucau w

Re: Startup time between TomEE 8.0.0-M1 Plus and MP

Exactly. Cheers, Roberto > On 22 Oct 2018, at 10:22, COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > Hello Roberto, > > So if I have understood you well TomEE MP is TomEE Web Profile + MP > specifications, right ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message- >

Re: Startup time between TomEE 8.0.0-M1 Plus and MP

Hi Francois, Thank you. TomEE MP is build from TomEE WebProfile, so it does support Java EE, including JPA and Concurrency. Stuff, available in MP Plus, like JMS or JBatch are currently not available in TomEE MP. Regarding the error, I’ve only notice them after the release. I suspect that t

Re: TomEE 8.0.0-M1 has been released :-)

Hi Francois, Thank you. You are correct. TomEE 8 targets Java EE 8, but please note that we don’t have the TCK, so we cannot say we are fully compliant. Yes, you are also correct regarding MP. Cheers, Roberto > On 22 Oct 2018, at 01:44, COURTAULT Francois > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > >

Re: Tomee 7.1.0 and MicroProfiles

Thank you sir :) > On 17 Sep 2018, at 09:13, Vincenzo D'Aniello > wrote: > > Ok, thank you so much for the answer, and good work for everything you do. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html

Re: Tomee 7.1.0 and MicroProfiles

on the blog of tomtribe I learned that in tomee 7.1.0 > was introduced MicroProfile, and in the same post, Roberto Cortez, writes > that soon will be published some examples on how to use MP. > > https://www.tomitribe.com/blog/tomee-an-overview-of-the-tomee-7-1-release/ > &

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Roberto Cortez as new Apache TomEE committer

uis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Struberg > wrote: > >> Good morning ladies and gents! >> >> It's a great pleasure to announce that Roberto Cortez has accepted our

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache TomEE 7.1.0 Released

? >> I hope that, at least, as TomEE 7.0.5 has already been certified on >> Java 9, TomEE 7.1.0 is also certified on Java 9, right ? >> What about TomEE 7.1.0 Java 10 certification ? >> >> You also have to say that the TomEE 7.1.0 MP certifications are: >> - 1.1 for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache TomEE 7.1.0 Released

Great! Thank you for all your work during the release process! Cheers, Roberto > On 7 Sep 2018, at 16:08, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache TomEE 7.1.0. > > Apache TomEE delivers enterprise application containers and services based > on, but not limi

Re: [RELEASE] TomEE 7.0.5

Open API 1.0, >> Rest Client 1.0 added, right ? >>> >>> Why the availability of TomEE 7.1 hasn't been announced ? >> >> 7.1 hasn't been released yet. If there's a tag, it'll likely have to >> be deleted. >> >> >> -Davi

Re: [RELEASE] TomEE 7.0.5

Hi Francois, Right now, we are targeting MP 1.3 for TomEE 8. Unfortunately some of the implementations required for MP 1.3 also required CDI 2.0 that is only available in TomEE 8. We added some of the specs from MP that were compatible with TomEE 7. So, on TomEE 7 we support MP 1.2 without Met

Re: Connector Resource Adapter Issues

Timer threads to change the connections Set and cause a  java.util.ConcurrentModificationException. This time, I've also submitted a patch :) Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez To: Romain Manni-Bucau ; "users@tomee.apache.org" Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:43 AM Subject: Re

Re: Can't read beans.xml (TomEE 1.7.4 + new Camel CDI)

Hi Dmitry, I'm using Camel CDI with 1.7.4. If you really want to use it this way you can. Is not the best solution ever, but it works: Just create a project to add camel-cdi jar and then run the maven assembly plugin to generate your own jar to remove beans.xml. Something like this: http://maven.

Re: Connector Resource Adapter Issues

Thank you Romain! Next time, let me submit the patch myself :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:01 AM Subject: Re: Connector Resource Adapter Issues Hi Roberto, Made first one not fai

Re: Connector Resource Adapter Issues

And the issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1816 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1817 From: Roberto Cortez To: "users@tomee.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 4:50 PM Subject: Connector Resource Adapter Issues Hi, I have been impl

Connector Resource Adapter Issues

Hi, I have been implementing a Connector Resource Adapter and run into some issues: -  If I add a property getter into a resourceadapter-class or into a managedconnectionfactory-class, when deploying I get a NPE, since it expects the setter to be there. The deployed classes are available,

Re: measure session size?

Hi, Excuse me for the publicity, but you might want to try the tool XRebel. It should measure your session size. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 8:35 PM Subject: Re: measure session size? Yep depends your config

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

> @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha : > > Roberto, > > > > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: Roberto Cortez ; "users@tomee.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitrib

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533  Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez To: "users@tomee.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.ja

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Thanks! I'll have a look. From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 11:10 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 On CDI entry points are: 1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses 2) CdiScanner Romain Mann

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Great! Kicking out new builds. Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something? Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM Sub

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

ht?  I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but > for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. > > John > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez > wrote: > >> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) >>   

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: Roberto Cortez Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; David Blevins Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url:  https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez To: Romain Manni-Bucau ; &

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" ; Roberto Cortez Cc: David Blevins Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again?

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez To: David Blevins ; "users@tomee.apache.org" Se

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.  Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Hi Romain, Yes, Travis was also setup as a backup plan. Let's see what's going to happen with Cloudbees. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: "users@tomee.apache.org" Cc: Roberto Cortez Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Ja

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:  https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got