Great!
Kicking out new builds.
Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can
help / guide me on something?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Roberto Cortez
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
> Thank you John!
> I just added the dependencies for batch as well in
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so
> that took care of a few missing tests.
> Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml,
> since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi
> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
> now
>
> Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> Hey all,
>>
>> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>>
>> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>>
>> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
>> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
>> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
> tests.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
> <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>> To: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; David Blevins <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>>
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>>> > great, thks
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau
>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>:
>>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>>> delete
>>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>>> same
>>> >> url:
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>
>>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>; "
> [email protected]
>>> "
>>> >> <[email protected]>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Roberto Cortez
>>> >> <[email protected]>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello Roberto,
>>> >>
>>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> >> @rmannibucau
>>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]
>>> >:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Roberto
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>
>>> >>> To: David Blevins <[email protected]>; "[email protected]
> "
>>> >>> <[email protected]>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi David,
>>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>>> the
>>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>>> are
>>> >>> looking into it.
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
>>> >>> To: [email protected]; Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>>> track
>>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>>> Apache side
>>> >>> if needed.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -David
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi guys,
>>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>>> profiles
>>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>>> tests
>>> >>> we got the following results:
>>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>>> tests.
>>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>>> Missing
>>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>>> - No
>>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>>> Related
>>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>>> OKjta -
>>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>>> Failing a
>>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>>> Failureswebsocket -
>>> >>> OK
>>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
> detail
>>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>>> missing
>>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>>> environment,
>>> >>> but it will be there.
>>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>> >>> To: [email protected]
>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>>> 7.0.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>> >>>> tomee
>>> >>>> zip).
>>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
> it
>>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>>> stay
>>> >>> apache.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>>> the
>>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
