It doesn't look like it's had a release yet. It's at 1.0-SNAPSHOT still.
On 3/17/08, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:59 PM
Martijn,
What I need is something like the Actions column on the DataTable
Example found at http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/ but the column
should be sortable just like the First Name and Last Name columns of
that same example.
Regards,
Johnnie
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
create a
Hi Fatih,
The problem is that you have not set a model on your drop down choice so
there is a null model which causes the exception you see to be generated.
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempt to set model object on
null model of component:
That's really weird. updateTree() should work in all supported browsers.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:34 PM, jeredm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more note. The updateTree() call did work in Firefox, but not in IE6 or
IE7.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Hi,
you shouldn't do
Ahhh... does anyone know if a release is planned in the near future?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Carman
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:38 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
It doesn't look like it's had
But if checkRequired () returns true isRequired () called again
generating a validation error...
if (isValid() isRequired()
getConvertedInput() == null isInputNullable()) the second
check. Doesn't call the chechRequired ()
{
+1
Wouter
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear
It should be probably like this
if (isValid() (isRequired() ? !checkRequired
() : true) getConvertedInput() == null isInputNullable())
the second check. Doesn't call the chechRequired ()
{
reportRequiredError();
Johnnie,
All you need to do is override PropertyColumn#populateItem() as I've done
below.
The column is still sortable.
In my case, I add an ExternalLink to the cell that does a popup, but this
code gives you the general idea.
Phil
columns.add(new PropertyColumn(new Model(Title),
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply. I have looked closer just after sending the email
found the problem and fixed it same as you have told. The new problem I am
facing is, how to get the selected values of the select boxes. Would you
please give me an idea on how to do this.
Thx.
Fatih
Just out of curiosity, are most people using the ModalWindow provided by the
extensions project or are they wrapping a custom component around an
existing javascript lib? If the second option, what libs are people using
and can anyone provide their experiences and possibly code.
--
View this
[ X ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16100542.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
I am newbie on wicket and it is starting to impress me.
It is a perfect web framework.
Thx everyone.
Fatih
final ListView productPropertyList = .
Found it :)
ListItem item = (ListItem) productPropertyList.iterator().next();
DropDownChoice d= (DropDownChoice) item.get(dropDown);
why should we call checkrequired() twice?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be probably like this
if (isValid() (isRequired() ? !checkRequired
() : true) getConvertedInput() == null isInputNullable())
Hi, I am new to Wicket and to help me learn, I created a Wicket version of
the Flickr demo like the one on the Ruby on Rails site seen here
http://www.rubyonrails.org/screencasts. I put my version in my blog here:
http://limboville.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html. Please take a look
and give
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:44:19AM -0700, BertrandDatas wrote:
Yes, surely I could but it is not the case I want to make the validation
during the onSubmit of a dynamically generated button which is embed in a
panel and this panel is in the form that I want to validate , so I cannot do
this.
I am not sure but I suspect that if the method checkRequired
returns true a requirement condition must always met in any case or
the behavior is different?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why should we call checkrequired() twice?
-igor
On Mon,
Hi all,
In my application I track the number of users logged in. When they logout, I
decrement the count. However, not every user will do an explicit logout, so
I have to depend on the container to destroy the session.
Because not all sessions are 'logged in' sessions, I need to check wheter
the
I run into this problem implementing my own component as a subclass
of the FormComponentPanel class. In my case the method checkRequired
just always returns TRUE but if I set required property to TRUE the
component always generate a validation error (field bla-bla-bla is
required).
On Mon, Mar
We had a custom dialog but we replaced it with modalwindow. Now we are
using it all over the place.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:35 PM, mnwicket [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity, are most people using the ModalWindow provided by the
extensions project or are they wrapping
I have a lot of images bound to some component under the same directory.
Images and htmls are located at the same directory in classes/ ,
It's necessary to assign wicket:id for each IMG tag.
It is tedious and error-prone , and refactory-unfriendly (
ResourceReference(Clazz.class , filename.jpg) );
Take a look at the IRequestLogger interface it provides all sorts of
statistics although not the number of authenticated users, but maybe
you can customize the SessionData class a bit to include that
information.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Martijn Lindhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
So the HybridUrlCodingStrategy is great for AJAX pages. I have a bit of an
issue where I need something like the HybridUrlCodingStrategy except it can
take GET parameters and not lose its mount point. Anyone know of something
like this out there? From the Wicket Java docs, it doesn't
We make heave use of the ModalWindow provided by the extensions project. It
works very well.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: mnwicket [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. März 2008 20:36
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Wicket ModalWindow vs Other
Just out of curiosity,
Thank you!! I added the AddThis button. Someone had sent me a screenshot
of how they wanted the button to look, and I couldn't tell that it was a
screenshot of the AddThis button.
Thanks again,
Jeremy Thomerson
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
I am using the ModalWindow.
mnwicket wrote:
Just out of curiosity, are most people using the ModalWindow provided by
the extensions project or are they wrapping a custom component around an
existing javascript lib? If the second option, what libs are people using
and can anyone provide
I've got a group of seven radio buttons, some of which are supposed to
be correlated with a textfield. Meaning, when I select a particular
radio button the textfield on its right side is supposed to get a cursor
focus. Similarly, whenever I change my radio button selection, I need
any previously
keep track of all the sessionids that have logged in in an List that you
keep on your Application object.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Martijn Lindhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
In my application I track the number of users logged in. When they logout,
I
decrement the count.
Wrap them all in wicket:link.
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 04:22 +0800, smallufo wrote:
I have a lot of images bound to some component under the same directory.
Images and htmls are located at the same directory in classes/ ,
It's necessary to assign wicket:id for each IMG tag.
It is tedious and
thanx, that's a simple one!
2008/3/17, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
keep track of all the sessionids that have logged in in an List that you
keep on your Application object.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Martijn Lindhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
In my
the reason formcomponentpanel.checkrequired() always returns true is
that for a formcomponentpanel it is often a noop. so that is the best
default implementation we can provide. you can always override it to
implement some logic if you need...
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Vitaly
You really, really should read:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
On 3/17/08, Fatih Mehmet UÇAR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am newbie on wicket and it is starting to impress me.
It is a perfect web framework.
Thx everyone.
Fatih
final ListView
If the method checkRequired () returns TRUE that means, I guess, the
requirement condition check must always pass, but it doesn't happens.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the reason formcomponentpanel.checkrequired() always returns true is
that for a
Oops , sorry for my trivial question.
2008/3/18, Martin Grigorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wrap them all in wicket:link.
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 04:22 +0800, smallufo wrote:
I have a lot of images bound to some component under the same directory.
Images and htmls are located at the same
no, that means that effectively required check is disabled - eg it always passes
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the method checkRequired () returns TRUE that means, I guess, the
requirement condition check must always pass, but it doesn't
Hi,
that's certainly a very nice tutorial! You could consider
IAjaxCallDecorator instead of directly modyfing the onclick attribute.
See AjaxButton#getAjaxCallDecorator();
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I am new to Wicket and to help me
Ok :)
I have the following
checkRequired () {
return true;
}
isRequired () {
return true;
}
In the case above Do I have an error message saying that the field
is required?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, that means
+1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3On 18/03/2008, at 3:35 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:+1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for
there are a couple of things i would change
1) add(new StyleSheetReference(pageCss, getClass(), flickr.css));
do you really need that? can you not simply put link tag inside
wicket:link tags?
2) // Initially there is no photo to display so add a temporary place
holder component to make Wicket
you should not, since checkrequired() will pass.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok :)
I have the following
checkRequired () {
return true;
}
isRequired () {
return true;
}
In the case above Do I have an
True. But I do... unfortunately.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you should not, since checkrequired() will pass.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Vitaly Tsaplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok :)
I have the following
+1
(poor Juan - will he demand a recount?)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16105701.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1 for generics
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
yes, generics! It would make the model business so much more clear.
ryan
Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Ned Collyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy,
Just curious what experiences people had with serialization and
generics, never having played there myself...
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is the accompanying discussion thread for the ongoing vote
on the same subject. Please use this discussion thread for
what do those 2 have to do with each other?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Alex Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious what experiences people had with serialization and
generics, never having played there myself...
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread
It seem it happens because the method getConvertedInput () of the
FormComponentPanel returns null since methods setConvertedInput (),
setModeValue and convertInput() were never called.
public final void validate()
{
validateRequired();
if
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Alex Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious what experiences people had with serialization and
generics, never having played there myself...
No particular issues; just works like it would work with non-generified code.
Eelco
[ x ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, unfortunately, one would have to live with that.
should've mentioned that ;)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creating new page version every time...
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the following
i assumed you properly implemented convertinput(). you cannot call
setrequired(true) on the formcomponentpanel and then expect to
completely avoid the required check.
the required check is two-pronged. first half is done in the
checkRequired() and works on the raw input. second part makes sure
Been reading about wicket and would want to know the context in which the
back button problem is being talked about..the only problem i have faced
with respect to back button is the double form submission, cant frame myself
in the right context...Can someone give a real life example of what
My component accepts 3 models as parameters, and uses this models
internally. The component's model is not involved at all. You mean the
method convertinput () must return at least something other then null?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i assumed you
Hi,
I enjoy clicking around the source at http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/.
It's interesting stuff :)
Page expiry is very frustrating, especially when you tab back to the code to
see how something is achieved.
Can we make the code pages either static or stateless, so I can bookmark
them,
+1 for 'Option B': 1.4=generics, drop java 1.4 support
This is coming from a large DoD application (notoriously behind the
technology power curve), the only thing not generified is our UI (Wicket)
stuff.
I think maintaining 'one behind' JVM compatibility is sufficient. I mean,
come on... Java
well, you dont want to implement input processing, yet you are using
setrequired - which is used in that processing...you see the delema?
what you should do is:
class mypanel extends fcp {
public mypanel {
super(id, new Model());
}
convertinput() { setconvertedinput(Boolean.TRUE); }
}
The BB issue wicket solves is in the context of stateful frameworks only in
my opinion...I dont think the same would be an issue in stateless frameworks
like struts or even with conventional jsp/servlet programming, given their
stateless nature..
Excerpt from a wicket wiki page..
Suppose you
It seems to me that if there was a problem with Serialization, then
normal pages would not work, right?
So, does anybody have an idea why my pages generally work, but I get a
StreamCorruptedException only when using the autocomplete component?
The stack trace and also stepping through the code
Thanks Igor,
With the Date object we have a very nice and consistent example. I
implemented my DatePicker exactly this way. But sometimes if the data
is spread over different properties of a bean or even between
different beans but still needs to be processed in a consistent manner
the
+1
(Sorry, didn't see this thread before posting in the other)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16112208.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
you still have broken validator support for that fcp. also inside
formvalidator.validate() you cannot yet access the model, but only
getconvertedinput() - which will always be null for your fcp so how do
you validate its value inside the form validator? you probably only
use it to trigger
+1, very frustrating indeed. If we could make them stateless, that'd be great!
On 3/17/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I enjoy clicking around the source at http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/.
It's interesting stuff :)
Page expiry is very frustrating, especially when
need to file an rfe in jira, patches are also welcome :)
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:43 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, very frustrating indeed. If we could make them stateless, that'd be
great!
On 3/17/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
that is pretty much correct. however, this problem is present any time
you use session scope to store values, not just in wicket. a lot of
the times when using stateless frameworks and managing a complex ui or
a complex user interaction you start putting things into session
because managing state
On 3/17/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
need to file an rfe in jira, patches are also welcome :)
Perhaps we could have some test cases that assert that the pages are
indeed stateless? Does that work?
assertTrue(page.isStateless());
Do you need to have WicketTester start the page
Which is the name of the embebed Eclipse browser you are using?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
there are a couple of things i would change
1) add(new StyleSheetReference(pageCss, getClass(), flickr.css));
do you really need that? can you not simply
Does this stuff here prevent double submit?
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/settings/IRequestCycleSettings.html
...so that not only form submits are shielded from the double submit
problem...
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Joel Hill [EMAIL
that prevents that do you want to post the form again? dialog that
happens when you use the back button to go back to a page that had a
form you submitted.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this stuff here prevent double submit?
Raised at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1431
No patch yet Igor :) if I get a chance, ill attach one.
Rgds
Ned
igor.vaynberg wrote:
need to file an rfe in jira, patches are also welcome :)
-igor
--
View this message in context:
+1
although i say this feeling badly about the possibility that mob rule could
make johan's life harder. in fact, if enough core developers are opposed to
this plan, i think that probably overrules a user vote. after all the core
developers actually have to do all this work (and for free, i
we did stress testing of a pretty complex ui at thoof and found we could
handle something like 20,000 sessions under simulation on a webnode pair
with full failover.
i am aware of sites (who will remain nameless for a while, unfortunately)
with millions of users who are switching to wicket.
i
+1
although i say this feeling badly about the possibility that mob rule could
make johan's life harder. in fact, if enough core developers are opposed to
this plan, i think that probably overrules a user vote. after all the core
developers actually have to do all this work (and for
okay. sounds good. i find it hard to imagine many people missing 1.3 if
1.4 was available with generics on java 5.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
+1
although i say this feeling badly about the possibility that mob rule
could
make johan's life harder. in fact, if enough core developers are
Well, IChoiceRenderer gives you ability to use any field of your custom
choice object for rendering. In order to select a choice before rendering
I'd implement custom choices IModel with additional method like: Object
getSelected(T key) to set selection model object properly. Then I use
101 - 175 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
