Hello.
I'm writing a wicket application for facebook, but I think my problem may be
common to many wicket applications.
In my case, I'm using the wicket-facebook authentication strategy that is
described in a different thread here on nabble. That works great - when a
page is rendered, the
She's just trying to explain herself in a language that is not her own
and that certainly she doesn't use for every day life... Have you ever
been in such a situation? I know it well because I have been there
myself... No need to be harsh...
Best Regards,
Ernesto.
Daan van Etten wrote:
create a custom request cycle and put this stuff in requestcycle#onbeginrequest
-igor
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Benny Weingarten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing a wicket application for facebook, but I think my problem may be
common to many wicket applications.
In my
Hi, all!
I have a question regarding the load testing of the Wicket application.
I have used this article
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/multiple-submit-buttons.html to create the
form in my application. All works well. But now I have to organize load
testing of my application.
I have read
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:29:37 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should be fine
Done, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1786
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
hi,
thanks. this works :-)
avajon
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:11 AM, brian.diekelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a few things going on here... try this and see if it does what
you
want it to do. If so reply back and I'll explain what the underlying issue
was:
TextField
Hi Igor, I tried your suggestion and it works but looks like a
workaround more than a solution.
I have many pages that need some configuration. This is server side
configuration, for example how often a page should refresh itself.
I tryed to pass in these parameters as PageParameters but in this
Can anyone helb with the above issue?
Kai Mütz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, whilw checking the checkbox the AJAX Debug window says:
Info: Set focus on required
That's all.
2008/8/8 Kai Mütz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have 2 form components in a form. A checkbox and a
For a project I also needed a AjaxSubmitLink to submit the tinyMce data, so
i've searched for a solution and found it at
http://dwairi.blogspot.com/2006/12/tinymce-ajax.html
The solution is to add tinyMCE.triggerSave(true,true); to the onclick of
the ajax button/link before the wicket code is
Hi Guys,
I seem to remember that there was a way to force Wicket to always serialize
pages on detach in order to make sure every page is serializable during
development. Can someone please point me to the FM so I can read it?
Searching Nabble Google didn't turn up anything.
this is 1.3.3
I'd say Igor's suggestion is a solution rather than workaround. There's just
no point in configuring pages by means of XML or - worse - even a spring
config. Passing in page specific parameters is exactly the way to go.
I tryed to pass in these parameters as PageParameters but in this way
I
I am using a tree table to display data from a database, however some of the
rows in the tree table needs to have multiple values that I would like to be
displayed in the same cell on multiple lines like:
Name | ABC
Variant names | ABC
Thomas Mäder schrieb:
I seem to remember that there was a way to force Wicket to always serialize
pages on detach in order to make sure every page is serializable during
development. Can someone please point me to the FM so I can read it?
Searching Nabble Google didn't turn up anything.
one
Yeah, but wasn't there official support for that? And if not, wouldn't
this be useful for debug?
Thomas
2008/8/11 Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Mäder schrieb:
I seem to remember that there was a way to force Wicket to always
serialize
pages on detach in order to make sure every
Hi Michael, the point is that this is not a user provided parameter
but a server-side page configuration parameter.
In this specific case I need to tell the page how often it should
auto-refresh. So it is not something that should be passed in from the
client over the url but something defined at
Well if it's no dynamic parameter but a static one, different for each page
... why not subclassing a basepage with changed attributes?
If the only problem you see is a missing overview, i.e. you'd like to
control the different values at one place, you should consider setting the
properties e.g.
Thats what I was thinking, too, when I read Uwes post. I did not look at
Wicket 1.4 yet, but had assumed that PageParameters should always be String to
String maps, because this is what they are in HTTP.
But then again, wicket is not strictly HTTP, and when you look at the javadoc
comment for
It seems this feature was removed, but there's some javadoc
left in org.apache.wicket.settings.IDebugSettings:
[quote]
iserializeSessionAttributes/i (defaults to true in development
mode) - Causes the framework
* to serialize any attribute put into session - this helps find Not
Serializable
I just tested my app in IE 7 since I also have a ModalWindow with an
AjaxSubmitLink that submits my form and closes the window and mine worked
fine. sorry I can't help with a solution but I can tell you that it is
possible to make work.
FakeBoy wrote:
Hi,
I tried to submit form from
add button's name attribute to the post params
iirc buttonname.x=2buttonname.y=2 will do
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:18 AM, ElSe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all!
I have a question regarding the load testing of the Wicket application.
I have used this article
wicket provides convinience methods for working with strings, eg a
method to automatically convert a string to an int so you dont have
to. likewise it will automatically convert all objects you put into it
to a string.
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Lutz Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then have your page look it up itself from the spring context using
some registry
class mypage extends webpage {
@SpringBean private PageConfigRegistry registry;
public mypage() {
mydata data=(mydata)registry.getdatafor(getclass());
// do whatever with data
// ^ or put that
Hi,
with current layout it is not possible for the TreeTable to have
variable row height.
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, kag1526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using a tree table to display data from a database, however some of the
rows in the tree table needs to have multiple values
Hi,
In Wicket by default IRequestCycleProcessor.respond(RuntimeException,
RequestCycle) method is called to handle runtime exceptions. In
AbstractRequestCycleProcessor this method throws
RestartResponseException (or RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException)
and then the other page is shown (eg.
Ah bugger! That was most convenient! I'd be very much in favor of it's
making a comeback
Thomas
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems this feature was removed, but there's some javadoc
left in org.apache.wicket.settings.IDebugSettings:
[quote]
ok... that make sense to me.
The primary then should be String, String but maybe overload it so
that nothing legacy breaks.
I think the String, ? will help, but I also think that being
specific about what it holds is important... otherwise its trying to
be too smart and I might get a
then, unfortunately, you have to perform the conversion yourself all
the time, which is quiet annoying.
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Brill Pappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok... that make sense to me.
The primary then should be String, String but maybe overload it so that
nothing
with the default diskstore pages are always serialized...
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Mäder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah bugger! That was most convenient! I'd be very much in favor of it's
making a comeback
Thomas
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh I wouldn't take out the convenience methods... but the base should
not be String,Object :)
Start with String, String then add any convenience methods from there.
I agree that manual conversion would be a bit of a pain, but most
people would only do it once if that was the only option
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:24 PM, nlif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Actually, when I said I googled a bit and found some material, I was in
fact
referring to your blog post and the slides :) This is very useful
information, and your comparison was done, IMHO, very fairly and
skillfully.
We are trying to figure out the best way to make our URLs portable.
Currently, we mount a QueryStringUrlEncodingStrategy in our
application class. Then, in the beginning of the page's constructor,
page parameters are mapped to instance variables. Then, when the
form button is clicked, a
2008/8/11 Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
then have your page look it up itself from the spring context using
some registry
class mypage extends webpage {
@SpringBean private PageConfigRegistry registry;
public mypage() {
mydata data=(mydata)registry.getdatafor(getclass());
// do
I have a TabbedPanel where the first tab is a search screen where you can
search the database and then click on a row to open detailed information
about that row in another tab. Some of the searches can take a long time in
the database so I need the search results to stay in the search tab even
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Lorenzo Bolzani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you are saying that wicket does not provide a standard way for page
configuration.
So I'll develop a custom solution based on spring or on property files.
there is no one-way-fits-all way of configuring pages, this is
you need to do this on model-level, not component level. there have
been threads on the mailing list about background tasks, even
search-result specific threads. search the list.
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:47 AM, kag1526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a TabbedPanel where the first tab is
It doesn't look as though there is any way to send a message to the
site admins listed on the Wicket Stuff site.
The web server is not setting the correct mime-type for .war files.
If any of the admins see this, could you add something like the
following (assuming Apache httpd)...
AddType
That was it. There was a no-cache header being sent to the browser from
tomcat. I'll post my findings for anyone else that is having the same
problem.
I used a tool called fiddler to examine the headers that were being sent
down. You can get it here: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/
After that
Thanks for your interest :)
I tried to isolate problem, because I use it in some context of my
application. I made small fake startup project only with only necessary
classes and this problem hasn't occured. So everything works fine. But I
made only simple dummy modal window with no listeners and
I have gotten the search tab to work by making the class that creates the tab
panel have a class variable called searchPanel that holds the panel that the
getPanel() method returns, (I create it the first time the tab is selected
and then just return it each time after that) I might have to go
I have a submit button that adds a message to my FeedbackPanel, like so:
if (isTestPassed()) {
...
} else {
setResponsePage(TestPage.class);
info(You didn't pass the test...);
}
However, when the browser gets to the TestPage, it doesn't display any
messages. I stepped
Yes, very sad. I had the pleasure of chatting and mailing with him a
couple of times, and was looking very much forward to getting
annotations into the Wicket security framework. This is truly a loss for
the Wicket community:(
RIP Maurice.
greeklinux wrote:
That is very sad.
Maurice, RIP
Hi, I GOT IT
I found the problem. The Problem was in the TextField with wicket id id.
When you want to safetly use ajax submit components (AjaxButton,
AjaxSubmitLink) your form components (TextFiels etc.) CAN NOT have wicket id
id, because ajax submit stop work in IE. For example:
also, don't use a submit button with wicket:id submit
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 PM, FakeBoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I GOT IT
I found the problem. The Problem was in the TextField with wicket id id.
When you want to safetly use ajax submit components (AjaxButton,
Hi,
I believe you want to display the feedback message in TestPage. If so,
do something like this:
1. make sure you have feedback panel added on the page where you will be
landing after redirect.
2. Then you can get hold of the feedback panel in the current page like
shown below:
FeedbackPanel
Let me publicly express my thanks for his work as well. While I'm new to
Wicket, I've seen Maurice's name often in the message archives. He responded
to requests for help quickly, effectively, and kindly. I have been deeply
impressed during my experience with Wicket, as much due to the quality of
I tried to follow your suggestions, but it is still not displaying messages
in the panel.
nanotech wrote:
I believe you want to display the feedback message in TestPage.
Yes, that's correct. TestPage extends BaseTemplate, which contains this:
BaseTemplate.java:
MessagePanel messagePanel
If you want to show messages on another page you need to use session
feedback messages (getSession().info)
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, insom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a submit button that adds a message to my FeedbackPanel, like so:
if (isTestPassed()) {
...
} else
If you want to show messages on another page you need to use session
feedback messages (getSession().info)
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, insom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a submit button that adds a message to my FeedbackPanel, like so:
if (isTestPassed()) {
...
} else
But, it's in a separate thread, right? So, you'll have to look for
error messages in a log file (or console window). Would a more
drastic response (error in the browser) be more appropriate during
development?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the
That solved it. I'm surprised -- considering that the original
getSession().getFeedbackMessages() showed the message, I had assumed that it
was being attached to the session. I guess I still have a lot to learn :)
Thanks for your help.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
If you want to show messages on
well, then check who removed them and ask them why they did that...
personally i dont mind looking into the console, but thats just me...
-igor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:10 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, it's in a separate thread, right? So, you'll have to look for
error
The only problem with having to look at the console is that sometimes
other logging can make that stuff fly by. And, if you're not watching
it, it's not obvious there's a problem. Perhaps a better solution
might be to check serializability using a unit test rather than by
exercising the pages
52 matches
Mail list logo
