Hi,
I'm not sure whether this is possible at all.
Why do you need to do this ?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Matthew Goodson
matt...@spidertracks.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to find out if an ajax request has come from page that was loaded
from the browsers cache. Does anyone have any
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Daan van Etten d...@stuq.nl wrote:
Op 26 apr 2011, om 16:41 heeft Martin Grigorov het volgende geschreven:
Not doing anything now because it can break in the future is not a really
good argument..?
Anything can break, that's why there are unit tests, release
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Eike Kettner n...@eknet.org wrote:
Hi Daniele,
This is not as bad as having to package the uber-jar with the war, sure.
Better than keeping a separate wicket codebase, at least :)
Anyway it's still a custom solution that I, and all wicket developers,
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Daniele Dellafiore
dani...@dellafiore.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Daan van Etten d...@stuq.nl wrote:
Op 26 apr 2011, om 16:41 heeft Martin Grigorov het volgende geschreven:
Not doing anything now because it can break in the future is not
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
I'm not against improving the current state. I'm saying that it want
last long without your help.
I said several times that the community can create the uber-jar
project in wicketstuff but so far no one wanted to do
Hi Daniele,
sorry for answering this late, anyways, inline reply.
On [Fri, 22.04.2011 16:09], Daniele Dellafiore wrote:
Hi, sorry I read your reply only today...
I got basically to the same results yesterday, but I've some problem which I
summarized in the last message in this thread on
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daniele Dellafiore
dani...@dellafiore.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
I'm not against improving the current state. I'm saying that it want
last long without your help.
I said several times that the
Hi Alec,
are you sure you are testing your code in DEPLOYMENT mode and not in
DEVELOPMENT mode?
To answer your question about benefits of using shared resources, I can
say that they make sense when you need to access a resource (like a
picture) with
an absolute path instead of a relative
Static resources are more suitable for the cases when you want to
avoid page locking.
E.g. when you need to deliver dynamic response and there is a chance
that the processing will be slower or there will be more clients for
the same resource. Using a normal component for this will suffer that
only
The current page selection is noticed by disabled link of the selected page
number.
In our project we need to highlight (bold font and colour) selected page by
means of css.
How this can be achived ?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
I think you can try to exclude the slfj dependency that wicket ships on,
since its being already contributed by Hibernate or just update you the
dependency
groupIdorg.slf4j/groupId
artifactIdslf4j-log4j12/artifactId
* version1.6.1/version*
/dependency
To the version that match the one provided
If you were wondering if you needed to miss this awesome validator
with Wicket 1.5, there's a release for that.
WicketStuff HTML Validator 1.5-rc3 has been released!
Thanks to Emond 'Refactor' Papegaaij we now have a Wicket 1.5 (rc3)
compatible HTML validator. This validator works unfortunately
That's it, I forced the usage of slf4j 1.6.1 and the propblem was solved.
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-RC3-with-hibernate-tp3477380p3478670.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
All,
Since I upgraded our project to wicket 1.4.17, I am seeing this warning:
http-2467-1 WARN [2011-04-27 17:22:00,574]
Enclosure.warnAboutFormComponentInsideEnclosure():196 - Found a form component
Oh, I see that there is a duplicate issue linked on JIRA which shows one use
case: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2541
Sorry!
RUSSELL E. MORRISEY
Programmer Analyst Professional
Mission Solutions Engineering, LLC
| russell.morri...@missionse.com
Yeah I'm not feeling too hopeful
I have a tabbed panel which loads the tabs via ajax. When the page is loaded
from the browsers cache i.e. the user hits the back button, the ajax request
to load the tab is sent but wicket thinks that tab is already loaded
(getSelectedTab()) so ignores the request.
16 matches
Mail list logo