But you did release them and obtained a financial benefit from the
releases, the very fact that it is released to the outside world make
others know of your existance and improves your exposure tremendously.
The particular point under discussion originally was whether a good and
active
+1000 to Martijn's comment. I've released a few open source components -
and none are at the level to be sold. Not because they can't be used - I do
use them in production. But because there are a million use cases and I
have no desire, time, or monetary reason to accommodate those use cases.
The problem with pre built components is that they never, ever are
exactly what you want or need. Maintaining such components for other
people is what I call hell. We are in the business of creating the
best Java web framework for building your own custom components with
unprecedented ease. This
On 02/12/2009, at 10:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
but as you will see, there is not much
demand for precanned components out there, they are just too easy to
roll yourself and there are a lot of open source ones that you can at
least get ideas from for your specific requirements.
But isn't
the interesting bit is that people are saying that there are not
enough components that wicket ships with, but no one is saying which
componets exactly they are missing.
-igor
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Ashley Aitken mrhat...@mac.com wrote:
On 02/12/2009, at 10:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
I agree that more components are needed and would add that a good
calendar would be a great place to start.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
the interesting bit is that people are saying that there are not
enough components that wicket ships
like this?
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/calendarviews-parent/
-igor
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:32 PM, ljw1001 ljw1...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that more components are needed and would add that a good calendar
would be a great place to
Hi,
Took some time to pick up this thread again as we were preparing for the
UAT of the application rewrite using Wicket =) for the last 2 weeks.
The UAT was quite successful, with minor modifications required (expected).
The real good news is that Wicket performed admirably in terms of
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Lester Chua cicowic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Took some time to pick up this thread again as we were preparing for the UAT
of the application rewrite using Wicket =) for the last 2 weeks.
The UAT was quite successful, with minor modifications required (expected).
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Lester Chua cicowic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've finished converting major portions of an existing in-house application
from EXTJS/JSON Servlets to Wicket as part of an evaluation of Wicket.
Right now I'm VERY impressed with the framework and would like to
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Lester Chua cicowic...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
1) Product Roadmap (Release plans, upcoming features etc)
This is important to us because it will at least indicate the intentions
of
Wicket Team. As any technology that is adopted enterprise-wide
1) Product Roadmap (Release plans, upcoming features etc)
This is important to us because it will at least indicate the intentions of
Wicket Team. As any technology that is adopted enterprise-wide needs to be
long-lived and well supported in addition to it's features and technology,
some
Thanks for the reply.
1) Product Roadmap (Release plans, upcoming features etc)
This is important to us because it will at least indicate the intentions of
Wicket Team. As any technology that is adopted enterprise-wide needs to be
long-lived and well supported in addition to it's features and
13 matches
Mail list logo
