Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi Thijs, thanks for your help, but you don't have to hurry. We faked the whole thing by running our Wicket-App inside an iFrame in Liferay. It is just for a showcase. So we don't need it right now. Thanks anyway, Benjamin On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Thijs Vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi Benjamin I'll see if I have some time left tomorrow, otherwise hopefully before next tuesday. Thijs Benjamin Ernst wrote: Hi Thijs, We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give us the advise you offered? That would be very nice. Thank you in advance,

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi Thijs, We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give us the advise you offered? That would be very nice. Thank you in advance, Benjamin On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Currently without building wicket against

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17077583.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

No, as described it depends on several factors 1. my/other people's time to commit to this 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications Thijs Bobby Quninne schreef: You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address JSR-268 compliance? Many thanks Thijs wrote:

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078122.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Bobby Quninne schreef: Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this? Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards compatible,

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078837.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

with Wicket and Liferay? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5

Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

issues with Wicket and Liferay? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p16995052.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi, I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still some